Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

BERT-based Financial Sentiment Index and LSTM-based Stock Return Predictability

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1906.09024 v2 pith:MR5QRJPR submitted 2019-06-21 q-fin.ST q-fin.GN

classification q-fin.STq-fin.GN
keywords sentimentfinancialanalysisindexbertcombininghandindividual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Traditional sentiment construction in finance relies heavily on the dictionary-based approach, with a few exceptions using simple machine learning techniques such as Naive Bayes classifier. While the current literature has not yet invoked the rapid advancement in the natural language processing, we construct in this research a textual-based sentiment index using a well-known pre-trained model BERT developed by Google, especially for three actively trading individual stocks in Hong Kong market with at the same time the hot discussion on Weibo.com. On the one hand, we demonstrate a significant enhancement of applying BERT in financial sentiment analysis when compared with the existing models. On the other hand, by combining with the other two commonly-used methods when it comes to building the sentiment index in the financial literature, i.e., the option-implied and the market-implied approaches, we propose a more general and comprehensive framework for the financial sentiment analysis, and further provide convincing outcomes for the predictability of individual stock return by combining LSTM (with a feature of a nonlinear mapping). It is significantly distinct with the dominating econometric methods in sentiment influence analysis which are all of a nature of linear regression.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating Financial Sentiment Analysis with Annotators Instruction Assisted Prompting: Enhancing Contextual Interpretation and Stock Prediction Accuracy

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Adding annotators' instructions to the prompt raises LLM financial sentiment accuracy on a new WallStreetBets dataset by an average of 5.90 percent, and a confidence-based sentiment score helps stock prediction on som...

  2. Integrating Natural Language Processing Techniques of Text Mining Into Financial System: Applications and Limitations

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 1.0 of 10

    A survey of 2018-2023 NLP-in-finance papers reports that asset pricing is the most studied component and that classification, LSTM, and BERT-style models dominate, with persistent data and interpretability limitations.

Pith tools