pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.09247 · v1 · pith:WKEWDMQLnew · submitted 2019-06-21 · 💻 cs.LG · stat.ML

Learning from weakly dependent data under Dobrushin's condition

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 18:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG stat.ML
keywords generalization boundsdependent dataDobrushin's conditionRademacher complexityVC dimensionlearning theoryweak dependencespatial data
0
0 comments X

The pith

Under Dobrushin's condition, standard Gaussian and Rademacher complexities and VC dimension suffice to bound generalization error for weakly dependent data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that data drawn from a joint distribution satisfying Dobrushin's condition allows the same complexity measures used in the independent case to control generalization and learning. Generalization bounds hold up to constant factors relative to i.i.d. analogs, while learnability rates suffer only logarithmic degradation in sample size. This matters for network or spatial sampling where observations are dependent yet not arbitrarily coupled, so existing tools apply without new complexity notions.

Core claim

When the data distribution satisfies Dobrushin's condition, the Gaussian complexity, Rademacher complexity, and VC dimension of a hypothesis class are sufficient to bound its generalization error and to obtain learnability rates; these bounds degrade by only constant factors for generalization and by logarithmic factors in the training-set size compared with the corresponding i.i.d. bounds.

What carries the argument

Dobrushin's condition, a quantitative bound on the dependence between any pair of variables, which lets standard complexity measures carry the argument without modification.

If this is right

  • Generalization error bounds for any hypothesis class remain within constant factors of their i.i.d. versions.
  • Learnability rates degrade by at most logarithmic factors in the number of training points.
  • The same Gaussian, Rademacher, and VC-dimension quantities control performance for network and spatial data.
  • No new complexity measures are required beyond those already used for independent samples.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Existing learning algorithms whose analysis relies only on Rademacher or VC bounds can be transferred to graph or lattice data without change, once Dobrushin's condition is verified.
  • Empirical checks of pairwise dependence strength on real sensor or social-network datasets could immediately certify that standard bounds apply.
  • The result suggests a route to relax Dobrushin's condition further while retaining the same complexity measures, by replacing the uniform pairwise bound with a decaying influence graph.

Load-bearing premise

The joint distribution of the observed variables must satisfy Dobrushin's condition that limits pairwise dependence.

What would settle it

A concrete counter-example would be a hypothesis class and a distribution obeying Dobrushin's condition for which the observed generalization gap grows faster than a constant multiple of the i.i.d. bound given by its Rademacher complexity.

read the original abstract

Statistical learning theory has largely focused on learning and generalization given independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) samples. Motivated by applications involving time-series data, there has been a growing literature on learning and generalization in settings where data is sampled from an ergodic process. This work has also developed complexity measures, which appropriately extend the notion of Rademacher complexity to bound the generalization error and learning rates of hypothesis classes in this setting. Rather than time-series data, our work is motivated by settings where data is sampled on a network or a spatial domain, and thus do not fit well within the framework of prior work. We provide learning and generalization bounds for data that are complexly dependent, yet their distribution satisfies the standard Dobrushin's condition. Indeed, we show that the standard complexity measures of Gaussian and Rademacher complexities and VC dimension are sufficient measures of complexity for the purposes of bounding the generalization error and learning rates of hypothesis classes in our setting. Moreover, our generalization bounds only degrade by constant factors compared to their i.i.d. analogs, and our learnability bounds degrade by log factors in the size of the training set.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper extends statistical learning theory beyond i.i.d. samples to data drawn from distributions satisfying Dobrushin's condition (a quantitative pairwise dependence bound), motivated by network or spatial sampling rather than time series. It claims that the standard i.i.d. complexity measures—Gaussian complexity, Rademacher complexity, and VC dimension—remain sufficient to control generalization error and learning rates, with generalization bounds degrading only by constant factors relative to their i.i.d. counterparts and learnability (sample-complexity) bounds degrading by logarithmic factors in the training-set size.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work is significant for providing a direct reduction from weakly dependent spatial/network data to existing i.i.d. complexity measures under an explicit, standard dependence condition, without introducing new dependence-adjusted complexities. This yields clean, usable bounds that differ from the i.i.d. case only by universal constants or log n factors, which is a strong positive for applications in spatial statistics and graph-structured data.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that the bounds 'only degrade by constant factors' and 'log factors in the size of the training set,' but does not indicate whether these constants or log factors are made explicit or left as existential; if the former, a short table or remark comparing the precise prefactors to the i.i.d. case would strengthen the contribution.
  2. The motivation section contrasts the setting with ergodic time-series work; a one-sentence pointer to the specific Dobrushin parameter range that excludes typical mixing conditions used in that literature would clarify the scope.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the recommendation for minor revision. The referee's summary accurately captures the paper's focus on generalization and learnability under Dobrushin's condition for weakly dependent spatial/network data, with bounds that degrade only by constants or log factors relative to the i.i.d. case.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation applies standard complexity measures under explicit quantitative assumption

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that Dobrushin's condition (a quantitative bound on pairwise dependence) allows the standard i.i.d. Gaussian/Rademacher complexities and VC dimension to control generalization and learning rates, with only constant-factor degradation in bounds and log-factor degradation in sample complexity. The abstract states this extension directly without any self-definitional steps, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. No equations or derivation steps reduce the claimed bounds to the inputs by construction; the dependence control is an external assumption that propagates to the empirical process. The result is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives score 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard concentration and complexity tools from learning theory plus the domain assumption of Dobrushin's condition; no free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Dobrushin's condition holds for the data-generating distribution
    Invoked to control dependence so that standard complexity measures apply.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5740 in / 1074 out tokens · 26155 ms · 2026-05-25T18:51:45.485045+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The generalization ability of online algorithms for dependent data

    Alekh Agarwal and John C Duchi. The generalization ability of online algorithms for dependent data. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 59 0 (1): 0 573--587, 2013

  2. [2]

    Rademacher and gaussian complexities: Risk bounds and structural results

    Peter L Bartlett and Shahar Mendelson. Rademacher and gaussian complexities: Risk bounds and structural results. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3 0 (Nov): 0 463--482, 2002

  3. [3]

    On the boundedness of bernoulli processes

    Witold Bednorz and Rafal Latala. On the boundedness of bernoulli processes. Annals of Mathematics, 180 0 (3): 0 1167--1203, 2014

  4. [4]

    Rate of convergence of predictive distributions for dependent data

    Patrizia Berti, Irene Crimaldi, Luca Pratelli, Pietro Rigo, et al. Rate of convergence of predictive distributions for dependent data. Bernoulli, 15 0 (4): 0 1351--1367, 2009

  5. [5]

    Network effects and welfare cultures

    Marianne Bertrand, Erzo FP Luttmer, and Sendhil Mullainathan. Network effects and welfare cultures. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 0 (3): 0 1019--1055, 2000

  6. [6]

    Identification of peer effects through social networks

    Yann Bramoull \'e , Habiba Djebbari, and Bernard Fortin. Identification of peer effects through social networks. Journal of econometrics, 150 0 (1): 0 41--55, 2009

  7. [7]

    Concentration Inequalities with Exchangeable Pairs

    Sourav Chatterjee. Concentration Inequalities with Exchangeable Pairs. PhD thesis, Stanford University, June 2005 a

  8. [8]

    Concentration inequalities with exchangeable pairs (Ph.D. thesis)

    Sourav Chatterjee. Concentration inequalities with exchangeable pairs (ph. d. thesis). arXiv preprint math/0507526, 2005 b

  9. [9]

    Social contagion theory: examining dynamic social networks and human behavior

    Nicholas A Christakis and James H Fowler. Social contagion theory: examining dynamic social networks and human behavior. Statistics in medicine, 32 0 (4): 0 556--577, 2013

  10. [10]

    Testing I sing models

    Constantinos Daskalakis, Nishanth Dikkala, and Gautam Kamath. Testing I sing models. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA '18, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2018. SIAM

  11. [11]

    On statistical learning via the lens of compression

    Ofir David, Shay Moran, and Amir Yehudayoff. On statistical learning via the lens of compression. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 2792--2800. Curran Associates Inc., 2016

  12. [12]

    The description of a random field by means of conditional probabilities and conditions of its regularity

    PL Dobrushin. The description of a random field by means of conditional probabilities and conditions of its regularity. Theory of Probability & Its Applications, 13 0 (2): 0 197--224, 1968

  13. [13]

    Completely analytical interactions: constructive description

    RL Dobrushin and SB Shlosman. Completely analytical interactions: constructive description. Journal of Statistical Physics, 46 0 (5-6): 0 983--1014, 1987

  14. [14]

    The role of information and social interactions in retirement plan decisions: Evidence from a randomized experiment

    Esther Duflo and Emmanuel Saez. The role of information and social interactions in retirement plan decisions: Evidence from a randomized experiment. The Quarterly journal of economics, 118 0 (3): 0 815--842, 2003

  15. [15]

    Boosting a weak learning algorithm by majority

    Yoav Freund. Boosting a weak learning algorithm by majority. Information and computation, 121 0 (2): 0 256--285, 1995

  16. [16]

    Concentration inequalities for polynomials of contracting Ising models

    Reza Gheissari, Eyal Lubetzky, and Yuval Peres. Concentration inequalities for polynomials of contracting I sing models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.00121, 2017

  17. [17]

    Crime and social interactions

    Edward L Glaeser, Bruce Sacerdote, and Jose A Scheinkman. Crime and social interactions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111 0 (2): 0 507--548, 1996

  18. [18]

    Waves i & ii, 1994--1996; wave iii, 2001--2002; wave iv, 2007--2009 [machine-readable data file and documentation]

    Kathleen Mullan Harris, National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, et al. Waves i & ii, 1994--1996; wave iii, 2001--2002; wave iv, 2007--2009 [machine-readable data file and documentation]. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 10, 2009

  19. [19]

    Concentration inequalities for functions of gibbs fields with application to diffraction and random gibbs measures

    Christof K \"u lske. Concentration inequalities for functions of gibbs fields with application to diffraction and random gibbs measures. Communications in mathematical physics, 239 0 (1-2): 0 29--51, 2003

  20. [20]

    Decay of correlations under dobrushin's uniqueness condition and its applications

    H K \"u nsch. Decay of correlations under dobrushin's uniqueness condition and its applications. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 84 0 (2): 0 207--222, 1982

  21. [21]

    Generalization bounds for time series prediction with non-stationary processes

    Vitaly Kuznetsov and Mehryar Mohri. Generalization bounds for time series prediction with non-stationary processes. In Peter Auer, Alexander Clark, Thomas Zeugmann, and Sandra Zilles, editors, Algorithmic Learning Theory, pages 260--274, Cham, 2014. Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-319-11662-4

  22. [22]

    Learning theory and algorithms for forecasting non-stationary time series

    Vitaly Kuznetsov and Mehryar Mohri. Learning theory and algorithms for forecasting non-stationary time series. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 541--549, 2015

  23. [23]

    Generalization bounds for non-stationary mixing processes

    Vitaly Kuznetsov and Mehryar Mohri. Generalization bounds for non-stationary mixing processes. Machine Learning, 106 0 (1): 0 93--117, Jan 2017. doi:10.1007/s10994-016-5588-2. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-016-5588-2

  24. [24]

    Levin, Yuval Peres, and Elizabeth L

    David A. Levin, Yuval Peres, and Elizabeth L. Wilmer. M arkov Chains and Mixing Times . American Mathematical Society, 2009

  25. [25]

    Prediction models for network-linked data

    Tianxi Li, Elizaveta Levina, and Ji Zhu. Prediction models for network-linked data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.01192, 2016

  26. [26]

    Relating data compression and learnability

    Nick Littlestone and Manfred Warmuth. Relating data compression and learnability. 1986

  27. [27]

    Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem

    Charles F Manski. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. The review of economic studies, 60 0 (3): 0 531--542, 1993

  28. [28]

    Bounding d -distance by informational divergence: A method to prove measure concentration

    Katalin Marton et al. Bounding d -distance by informational divergence: A method to prove measure concentration. The Annals of Probability, 24 0 (2): 0 857--866, 1996

  29. [29]

    Rademacher complexity of stationary sequences

    Daniel J. McDonald and Cosma Rohilla Shalizi. Rademacher complexity of stationary sequences. arXiv preprint arXiv:1106.0730, 2017

  30. [30]

    Rademacher complexity bounds for non-iid processes

    Mehryar Mohri and Afshin Rostamizadeh. Rademacher complexity bounds for non-iid processes. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 1097--1104, 2009

  31. [31]

    Stability bounds for stationary -mixing and -mixing processes

    Mehryar Mohri and Afshin Rostamizadeh. Stability bounds for stationary -mixing and -mixing processes. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11 0 (Feb): 0 789--814, 2010

  32. [32]

    The spread of innovations in social networks

    Andrea Montanari and Amin Saberi. The spread of innovations in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107 0 (47): 0 20196--20201, 2010. ISSN 0027-8424. doi:10.1073/pnas.1004098107. URL https://www.pnas.org/content/107/47/20196

  33. [33]

    Sample compression schemes for vc classes

    Shay Moran and Amir Yehudayoff. Sample compression schemes for vc classes. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 63 0 (3): 0 21, 2016

  34. [34]

    Predictive pac learnability: A paradigm for learning from exchangeable input data

    Vladimir Pestov. Predictive pac learnability: A paradigm for learning from exchangeable input data. In Granular Computing (GrC), 2010 IEEE International Conference on, pages 387--391. IEEE, 2010

  35. [35]

    Online learning: Random averages, combinatorial parameters, and learnability

    Alexander Rakhlin, Karthik Sridharan, and Ambuj Tewari. Online learning: Random averages, combinatorial parameters, and learnability. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 1984--1992, 2010

  36. [36]

    Peer effects with random assignment: Results for dartmouth roommates

    Bruce Sacerdote. Peer effects with random assignment: Results for dartmouth roommates. The Quarterly journal of economics, 116 0 (2): 0 681--704, 2001

  37. [37]

    Understanding machine learning: From theory to algorithms

    Shai Shalev-Shwartz and Shai Ben-David. Understanding machine learning: From theory to algorithms. Cambridge university press, 2014

  38. [38]

    The logarithmic sobolev inequality for discrete spin systems on a lattice

    Daniel W Stroock and Boguslaw Zegarlinski. The logarithmic sobolev inequality for discrete spin systems on a lattice. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 149 0 (1): 0 175--193, 1992

  39. [39]

    Majorizing measures: the generic chaining

    Michel Talagrand et al. Majorizing measures: the generic chaining. The Annals of Probability, 24 0 (3): 0 1049--1103, 1996

  40. [40]

    Banach-Mazur distances and finite-dimensional operator ideals, volume 38

    Nicole Tomczak-Jaegermann. Banach-Mazur distances and finite-dimensional operator ideals, volume 38. Longman Sc & Tech, 1989

  41. [41]

    Peer effects in adolescent overweight

    Justin G Trogdon, James Nonnemaker, and Joanne Pais. Peer effects in adolescent overweight. Journal of health economics, 27 0 (5): 0 1388--1399, 2008

  42. [42]

    On the uniform convergence of relative frequencies of events to their probabilities

    Vladimir N Vapnik and A Ya Chervonenkis. On the uniform convergence of relative frequencies of events to their probabilities. In Measures of complexity, pages 11--30. Springer, 2015

  43. [43]

    Combinatorial criteria for uniqueness of gibbs measures

    Dror Weitz. Combinatorial criteria for uniqueness of gibbs measures. Random Structures & Algorithms, 27 0 (4): 0 445--475, 2005

  44. [44]

    Rates of convergence for empirical processes of stationary mixing sequences

    Bin Yu. Rates of convergence for empirical processes of stationary mixing sequences. The Annals of Probability, pages 94--116, 1994