pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.11556 · v1 · pith:XDVE2UDYnew · submitted 2019-06-27 · 🧬 q-bio.PE · physics.soc-ph

Dynamics of disease spread. Effect of the characteristic times

O. Mosbah , N. Zekri , M. Mokhtari , S. Sahraoui This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 13:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.PE physics.soc-ph
keywords SEIR modelsmall world networkdisease spreadlatency timeinfection timeoscillatory behaviorepidemic dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

When latency time exceeds infection time in a network SEIR model, the proportion of infected individuals oscillates instead of growing exponentially.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how disease spreads through a population using a stochastic SEIR model on a small-world network. It finds that the relationship between latency time and infection time determines the time evolution of infections. If latency is shorter than infection time, infections increase exponentially. If latency is longer, oscillations appear. This could account for periodic patterns seen in real epidemics and affects how surveys measure spread.

Core claim

In the dynamic SEIR model on the Watts-Strogatz network, as long as the latency time remains smaller than the infection time, the proportion of infected individuals increases exponentially with time; otherwise an oscillatory behavior appears. This may explain the periodic behaviors in time observed by the health prevention services.

What carries the argument

The dynamic variant of the Watts-Strogatz Small World Network-based stochastic SEIR epidemic model with force of infection, latency and infection times.

If this is right

  • If latency time remains smaller than infection time, the proportion of infected individuals increases exponentially with time.
  • If latency time exceeds infection time, an oscillatory behavior appears in the proportion of infected individuals.
  • Periodic epidemiological surveys overestimate or underestimate the dynamics of infection unless survey periods match the characteristic times.
  • The model connects diffusion and relaxation processes to the infection characteristic time.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Comparing observed spread patterns in real diseases against their latency and infection durations could test the time-scale dependence.
  • Timing of health surveys to align with characteristic times might reduce estimation errors in practice.
  • Similar effects of time scales on spread dynamics could be checked in other network types or epidemic models.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen values and distributions for force of infection, latency time, and infection time in the dynamic SEIR model on the Watts-Strogatz network are sufficient to capture the essential dynamics of real transmissible diseases.

What would settle it

Observing exponential growth in the infected proportion even when latency time exceeds infection time in a real epidemic would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.11556 by M. Mokhtari, N. Zekri, O. Mosbah, S. Sahraoui.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Incidence of measles in the Wilaya of Oran (Algeria) during 2011 (from [30]). 2. Description of the model The original version of the SWN model proposed by Watts and Strogatz was based on an L-sized regular 1D network with periodic boundary conditions (2D regular network can be re-indexed into 1D network). Each node of the network is connected to K nearest neighbors, and each bond is rewired, with probabil… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: 1D SWN of 12 nodes with K = 2 and ϕ = 2, and p = 2/3. a) Short-cuts are frozen in time, b) same as a) after δt with dashed lines short-cuts c) The same as a) after 2δt with dotted lines short-cuts. a) (solid lines) are shown in b) and c) for comparison. Dashed ellipses are “virtual” nodes. 23001-4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Semi-logarithmic plots of a) time evolution of infected I, latencies IL and infectious individu￾als II , and b) A(t). tI = 3 days, and tL = 2 days. S(t) = Imax − I(t) = Imaxe −(t/tr) β ; β < 1. (3.3) On the other hand, it has been found that the disease spread in a SWN network is an exponential super￾diffusion [25]. A new kind of relaxation is thus expected for the present spread. In order to determine the… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Semi-logarithmic plots of 1/τ vs.: a) q for different p (tL = 5 days), b) p for various tL (q = 0.3), and c) tL for various q (p = 0.15). Data are compared with weekly and monthly surveys. tI = 7 days. Continuous lines are logarithmic fits of data. 0 1 0 20 1 0 -5 1 0 -4 1 0 -3 1 0 -2 1 0 -1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 fi t E q, 4 τ -1 =0, 87day -1 I =I I I , IL o r I I/IL ( % ) Time (days) a) tL=0 days 0 25 50 75 τ… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Semi-logarithmic plots of: I (full squares), IL (open squares) and II/IL (+) vs. time for different latency periods. a) tL = 0 day, b) tL = 6 days, c) tL = 13 days. Infection time is 6 days in both figures. 23001-8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Semi-logarithmic plot of temporal evolution of I, IL and II (curves) and IS (symbols) for p = 0.2, and q = 0.5 and different survey periods θ, a) tL = 8 days and tI = 5 days, b) tL = 5 days, tI = 8 days. and infection times. These times are actually around 7 days for measles. Then, weekly surveys are closer to the right infection dynamics for this disease. Monthly surveys overestimate this dynamics. A meth… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Dynamic properties of spreading infection through a heterogeneous population are studied numerically and analytically using a dynamic variant of Watts and Strogatz Small World Network-based stochastic Susceptible-Exposed-Infectious-Removed (SEIR) epidemic model. This model includes the main realistic parameters usually characterizing transmissible diseases, such as the force of infection, latency and infection times. As far as the latency time remains smaller than that of infection, the proportion of infected individuals increases exponentially with time, otherwise an oscillatory behavior appears. This may explain the periodic behaviors in time observed by the health prevention services. It is also shown that periodic epidemiological surveys overestimate or underestimate the dynamics of infection if the survey periods do not exactly correspond to the characteristic times of the infection. Further discussion is provided on the diffusion and relaxation processes involved in this model, and their relation to the infection characteristic time.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines disease spread dynamics via a stochastic SEIR model on a dynamic Watts-Strogatz small-world network. It incorporates force of infection, latency time, and infection time as key parameters. The central claim is that the proportion of infected individuals grows exponentially when latency time is smaller than infection time, but exhibits oscillatory behavior otherwise; this is offered as an explanation for observed periodic epidemic patterns. The work also analyzes how periodic surveys can over- or underestimate infection dynamics when survey intervals fail to match the characteristic times, and discusses associated diffusion and relaxation processes.

Significance. If the reported threshold behavior between exponential and oscillatory regimes proves robust, the results could help explain periodic outbreaks in real transmissible diseases and inform the design of epidemiological surveys. The combination of numerical simulation on networks with analytical discussion is a positive feature. The significance is limited by the absence of explicit checks against conventional exponential waiting-time assumptions, which are known to produce monotonic growth independent of the latency-to-infection ratio.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that exponential growth occurs precisely when latency time remains smaller than infection time (with oscillations otherwise) is presented as a general property of the model. Standard continuous-time SEIR processes with exponential waiting times yield monotonic growth for R0>1 regardless of the mean ratio. The manuscript must demonstrate whether the reported transition survives replacement of the authors' latency and infection time distributions by exponential ones (keeping only the means fixed) or whether it is an artifact of the chosen distributions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that exponential growth occurs precisely when latency time remains smaller than infection time (with oscillations otherwise) is presented as a general property of the model. Standard continuous-time SEIR processes with exponential waiting times yield monotonic growth for R0>1 regardless of the mean ratio. The manuscript must demonstrate whether the reported transition survives replacement of the authors' latency and infection time distributions by exponential ones (keeping only the means fixed) or whether it is an artifact of the chosen distributions.

    Authors: We agree that the transition is not a general property of all SEIR models and is tied to our use of fixed (deterministic) latency and infection times rather than exponential waiting times. The oscillatory regime arises because fixed delays allow synchronization of infection waves across the dynamic small-world network when latency exceeds infection time; exponential distributions erase this memory and produce the expected monotonic growth. The manuscript focuses on the effect of explicit characteristic times, which are more realistic for many diseases than the memoryless assumption. We will revise the abstract and add a clarifying paragraph (plus a brief numerical check with exponential times) to state that the reported threshold behavior is specific to fixed or low-variance delay distributions and does not hold under the conventional exponential assumption. This addresses the referee's concern directly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected; results are direct simulation outcomes

full rationale

The paper reports the latency-vs-infection threshold behavior as an observed outcome of stochastic SEIR simulations on a Watts-Strogatz network with explicitly chosen parameter distributions. No equations, fits, or self-citations are shown that would reduce the reported exponential-vs-oscillatory transition to a tautology or to the input parameters by construction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained; the claim is model-dependent simulation output rather than a fitted or self-referential prediction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; no explicit parameters, axioms, or new entities are stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5684 in / 1075 out tokens · 38247 ms · 2026-05-25T13:54:48.328842+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Dynamics of disease spread. Effect of the characteristic times

    IntRoDuCtIon In developed countries, death rate due to transmissible diseases has fallen sharply over the past century. Already in the late 1960s, it was believed that infectious diseases were being eradicated. Until now,apartfromsmallpox,transmissiblediseasescontinuetoplaguedespitetheadventofvaccination.In addition,inthemid-1970s,newinfectiousdiseaseswer...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  2. [2]

    They used a heterogeneous SIR model based on a variant of Watts and Strogatz Networks

    above the percolation threshold [26]. They used a heterogeneous SIR model based on a variant of Watts and Strogatz Networks. The rate of the exponential growth was found to increase logarithmically with p, p being the initial proportion of Susceptible [p = S(0)]. However, this model [25] neglected some realistic parameters like the characteristic times of...

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Each node of the network is connected toK nearest neighbors, and each bond is rewired, with probabilityϕ, to a new node randomly and uniformly chosen from the network [14]

    DESCRIPtIonoFthEmoDEl The original version of theSWN model proposed by Watts and Strogatz was based on an L-sized regular 1D network with periodic boundary conditions (2D regular network can be re-indexed into1D network). Each node of the network is connected toK nearest neighbors, and each bond is rewired, with probabilityϕ, to a new node randomly and un...

    work page

  4. [4]

    2ESultS Simulations are realized on sample networks of100 000 nodes (representing individuals). Infected individuals are initially (t = 0) either Latent (their proportion isIL) or Infectious (their proportion being II).Thetotalproportionofinfectedindividualsisthen I = IL + II.Inordertominimizefluctuations, dataareaveragedover 1000configurations.Inwhatfollow...

    work page

  5. [5]

    The growth exponent1/τ was found to correspond to a super-relaxation time for this kind of lattices

    ConCluSIon Inthispaper,thedynamicsofdiseasespreadwasexaminednumericallyusingtheSEIRmodelwithin the framework of a dynamical SWN-like Network. The growth exponent1/τ was found to correspond to a super-relaxation time for this kind of lattices. Its logarithmic dependence on the proportion of Susceptible p,observedpreviously[25]isalsoconfirmedfortheforceofinf...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Fraser D.W., Tsai T.R., Orenstein W., Parkin W.E., Beecham H.J., Sharrar R.G., Harris J., Mallison G.F., Martin S.M., McDade J.E., Shepard C.C., Brachman P.S., N. Engl. J. Med., 1977,297, 1189, doi:10.1056/NEJM197712012972201

    work page doi:10.1056/nejm197712012972201 1977

  7. [7]

    McDade J.E., Shepard C.C., Fraser D.W., Tsai T.R., Redus M.A., Dowdle W.R., N. Engl. J. Med., 1977,297, 1197, doi:10.1056/NEJM197712012972202

    work page doi:10.1056/nejm197712012972202 1977

  8. [8]

    Hayes E.B., Plesman J., N. Engl. J. Med., 2003,348, 2424, doi:10.1056/NEJMra021397

    work page doi:10.1056/nejmra021397 2003

  9. [9]

    Plesman J., Int. J. Microbiol., 2006,296, 17, doi:10.1016/j.ijmm.2005.11.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijmm.2005.11.007 2006

  10. [10]

    Robinson M.C., Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., 1955,49, 28, doi:10.1016/0035-9203(55)90080-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0035-9203(55)90080-8 1955

  11. [11]

    Saluzzo J.P., Cornet M., Digoutte J.P., Dakar Med., 1983,28, 497

    work page 1983

  12. [12]

    Trop., 2003,63, 381

    Ripert C., Le Coeur S., Kanshana S., Jourdain G., Med. Trop., 2003,63, 381

    work page 2003

  13. [13]

    Garten R.J., Davis C.T., Russell C.A., Shu B., Lindstrom S., Balish A., Sessions W.M., Xu X., Skepner E., Deyde V.,et al., Science, 2009,325, 197, doi:10.1126/science.1176225

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1176225 2009

  14. [14]

    le R., In: Opuscules Mathematiques, Vol

    D’Alembert J. le R., In: Opuscules Mathematiques, Vol. 2, D’Alembert J. le R. (Ed.), David, Paris, 1761, 26

    work page

  15. [15]

    Biosc., 2002,180, 1–21, doi:10.1016/S0025-5564(02)00122-0

    Dietz K., Heesterbeek J.A.P., Math. Biosc., 2002,180, 1–21, doi:10.1016/S0025-5564(02)00122-0

    work page doi:10.1016/s0025-5564(02)00122-0 2002

  16. [16]

    Kermack W.O., McKendrick A.G., Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 1927,115, 700, doi:10.1098/rspa.1927.0118

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1927.0118 1927

  17. [17]

    Anderson R.M., May R.M., Infectious Diseas of Humans: Dynamics and Control, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992

    work page 1992

  18. [18]

    Keeling M.J., Rohani P., Modeling Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2008

    work page 2008

  19. [19]

    Strogatz S.H., Nature, 2001,410, 268, doi:10.1038/35065725

    work page doi:10.1038/35065725 2001

  20. [20]

    Kleczkowski A., Oleś K., Gudowska-Nowak E., Gilligan C.A., J. R. Soc., Interface, 2001,9, 158, doi:10.1098/rsif.2011.0216

    work page doi:10.1098/rsif.2011.0216 2001

  21. [21]

    Hartvigsen G., Dresch J.M., Zielinski A.L., Macula A.J., Leary C.C., J. Theor. Biol., 2007,246, 205, doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.12.027

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.12.027 2007

  22. [22]

    Luo W., Int. J. Health Geographics, 2016,15, 28, doi:10.1186/s12942-016-0059-3

    work page doi:10.1186/s12942-016-0059-3 2016

  23. [23]

    Ma J., van den Driessche P., Willeboordse F.H., J. Theor. Biol., 2013,325, 12, doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.01.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.01.006 2013

  24. [24]

    Maharaj S., Kleczkowski A., BMC Public Health, 2012,12, 679, doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-679

    work page doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-679 2012

  25. [25]

    Reppas A.I., Spiliotis K., Siettos C.I., Landes Bioscience Virulence, 2012,3, 146, doi:10.4161/viru.19131

    work page doi:10.4161/viru.19131 2012

  26. [26]

    Castillo-Chavez C., Bichara D., Morin B.R., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2016,113, 14582, doi:10.1073/pnas.1604994113

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1604994113 2016

  27. [27]

    Enns E.A., Brandeau M.L., J. Theor. Biol., 2015,371, 154, doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.02.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.02.005 2015

  28. [28]

    Wang H., Li Q., D’Agostino G., Havlin S., Stanley H.E., Van Mieghem P., Phys. Rev. E, 2013,88, 022801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.88.022801

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.88.022801 2013

  29. [29]

    Vazquez A., Phys. Rev. E, 2006,74, 056101, doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.74.056101

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.74.056101 2006

  30. [30]

    Zekri N., Clerc J.P., Phys. Rev. E, 2001,64, 056115, doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.64.056115

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.64.056115 2001

  31. [31]

    Stauffer D., Aharony A., Introduction to Percolation Theory, Taylor & Francis, London, 1992

    work page 1992

  32. [32]

    Ochab J.K., Góra P.F., Eur. Phys. J. B, 2011,81, 373, doi:10.1140/epjb/e2011-10975-6

    work page doi:10.1140/epjb/e2011-10975-6 2011

  33. [33]

    Real World Appl., 2010,11, 55, doi:10.1016/j.nonrwa.2008.10.014

    McCluskey C.C., Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 2010,11, 55, doi:10.1016/j.nonrwa.2008.10.014

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nonrwa.2008.10.014 2010

  34. [34]

    Technol., 2015,20, 460, doi:10.1109/TST.2015.7297745

    Younsi F.-Z., Bounnekar A., Hamdadou D., Boussaid O., Tsinghua Sci. Technol., 2015,20, 460, doi:10.1109/TST.2015.7297745

    work page doi:10.1109/tst.2015.7297745 2015

  35. [35]

    Direction de la Santé et la Population, Oran, Algeria, 2012, private communication

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    Newman M.E.J., Watts D.J., Phys. Rev. E, 1999,60, 7332, doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.60.7332

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.60.7332 1999

  37. [37]

    Biosci., 1996,133, 165, doi:10.1016/0025-5564(95)00093-3

    Kretschmar M., Morris M., Math. Biosci., 1996,133, 165, doi:10.1016/0025-5564(95)00093-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0025-5564(95)00093-3 1996

  38. [38]

    Albert R., Jeong H., Barabási A-L., Nature, 1999,401, 130–131, doi:10.1038/43601

    work page doi:10.1038/43601 1999

  39. [39]

    Barabási A.-L., Albert R., Science, 1999,286, 509–512, doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509

    work page doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 1999

  40. [40]

    Zekri N., Clerc J.P., C. R. Phys., 2002,3, 741, doi:10.1016/S1631-0705(02)01367-1

    work page doi:10.1016/s1631-0705(02)01367-1 2002

  41. [41]

    5, Elsevier, North Holland, 2013

    Landau L.D., Lifshitz E.M., Statistical Physics, Vol. 5, Elsevier, North Holland, 2013

    work page 2013

  42. [42]

    Central African Republic and Chad profile, WHO/HSE/GAR/DCE/2009.2, World Health Organization, 2010

    Communicable disease epidemiological. Central African Republic and Chad profile, WHO/HSE/GAR/DCE/2009.2, World Health Organization, 2010. URL https://www.who.int/diseasecontrol_emergencies/toolkits/chad/en/

    work page 2009

  43. [43]

    Metzler R., Barkai E., Klafter J., Phys. Rev. Lett., 1999,82, 3563, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.3563

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.3563 1999

  44. [44]

    Rep., 2000,339, 1, doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00070-3

    Metzler R., Klafter J., Phys. Rep., 2000,339, 1, doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00070-3

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(00)00070-3 2000

  45. [45]

    Kremer F., Shonhals A., Broadband Dielectric Spectroscopy, Springer, Heidelberg, 2003

    work page 2003

  46. [46]

    малого свIту

    Heymans N., Bauwens J.-C., Rheol. Acta, 1994,33, 210, doi:10.1007/BF00437306. 23001-11 /.-OSBAh,..:EkRI,-.-OkhTARI,3.3AhRAOUI ДинамIка розповсюдження хвороб.Вплив характерних перIодIв часу /.Мосбах1,Н.ЗекрI1,-.МохтарI1,2,С.СахравI3 1 УнIверситет наукиI технологIйIм.Мохамеда БудIафам,Оран,534/--B,,E0-,B01505,31000Оран,Алжир 2 УнIверситетський центр ТIссемс...

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00437306 1994