Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Survey on GANs for Anomaly Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1906.11632 v2 pith:2VCGLQBB submitted 2019-06-27 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords anomalydetectiongansadversarialbeendifferentproblemresults
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Anomaly detection is a significant problem faced in several research areas. Detecting and correctly classifying something unseen as anomalous is a challenging problem that has been tackled in many different manners over the years. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and the adversarial training process have been recently employed to face this task yielding remarkable results. In this paper we survey the principal GAN-based anomaly detection methods, highlighting their pros and cons. Our contributions are the empirical validation of the main GAN models for anomaly detection, the increase of the experimental results on different datasets and the public release of a complete Open Source toolbox for Anomaly Detection using GANs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Uncertainty-Aware Ankle Exoskeleton Control

    cs.RO 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An ensemble of gait-phase estimators serves as an uncertainty detector that switches an ankle exoskeleton from assisting to unpowered when it encounters out-of-distribution movements.

  2. Dirty and Clean-Label attack detection using GAN discriminators

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A single-class GAN discriminator with a calibrated confidence threshold detected 100% of tested FGSM-poisoned MNIST images at epsilon around 0.2 to 0.3, with weaker dirty-label separation for some digit pairs.

Pith tools