Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

R\'enyi Fair Inference

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1906.12005 v2 pith:Q3B4GRIA submitted 2019-06-28 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords fairfairnesslearningalgorithmsmachinebeenenyiimpose
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning algorithms have been increasingly deployed in critical automated decision-making systems that directly affect human lives. When these algorithms are only trained to minimize the training/test error, they could suffer from systematic discrimination against individuals based on their sensitive attributes such as gender or race. Recently, there has been a surge in machine learning society to develop algorithms for fair machine learning. In particular, many adversarial learning procedures have been proposed to impose fairness. Unfortunately, these algorithms either can only impose fairness up to first-order dependence between the variables, or they lack computational convergence guarantees. In this paper, we use R\'enyi correlation as a measure of fairness of machine learning models and develop a general training framework to impose fairness. In particular, we propose a min-max formulation which balances the accuracy and fairness when solved to optimality. For the case of discrete sensitive attributes, we suggest an iterative algorithm with theoretical convergence guarantee for solving the proposed min-max problem. Our algorithm and analysis are then specialized to fair classification and the fair clustering problem under disparate impact doctrine. Finally, the performance of the proposed R\'enyi fair inference framework is evaluated on Adult and Bank datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TowerDebias: A Novel Unfairness Removal Method Based on the Tower Property

    cs.LG 2024-11 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    TowerDebias averages predictions over the sensitive attribute using the Tower Property, but its claimed fairness-improvement theorem is not proven and is false as stated.

Pith tools