pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.12273 · v1 · pith:EVKISDP6new · submitted 2019-06-28 · ⚛️ physics.space-ph · astro-ph.SR

Helium Variation Across Two Solar Cycles Reveals A Speed-Dependent Phase Lag

B. L. Alterman , Justin C. Kasper This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 13:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.space-ph astro-ph.SR
keywords solar windhelium abundancesunspot numberphase lagsolar cyclesolar wind speed
0
0 comments X

The pith

The phase delay between solar wind helium abundance and sunspot number increases monotonically with solar wind speed.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the helium-to-hydrogen ratio in the solar wind over two complete solar cycles observed by the Wind spacecraft. It establishes that the delay between changes in this ratio and sunspot number grows steadily larger at higher solar wind speeds. Accounting for this speed-dependent delay aligns the helium abundance with sunspot number values identically whether the cycle is ascending or descending. This pattern points to a formation process at the Sun that reduces helium in slower wind streams.

Core claim

The phase delay between A_He and SSN is a monotonic increasing function of v_SW. Correcting for this lag, A_He returns to the same value at a given SSN over all rising and falling phases and across solar wind speeds. We infer that this speed-dependent lag is a consequence of the mechanism that depletes slow wind A_He from its fast wind value during solar wind formation.

What carries the argument

The speed-dependent phase lag between helium abundance ratio A_He and sunspot number SSN, which produces consistent A_He values at fixed SSN once corrected.

Load-bearing premise

The measured phase lag reflects a physical depletion process during solar wind formation rather than an artifact of data sampling or processing.

What would settle it

Independent measurements from another spacecraft or solar cycle that show either no increase in phase lag with solar wind speed or inconsistent A_He values at the same SSN after lag correction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.12273 by B. L. Alterman, Justin C. Kasper.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Helium abundance (AHe) as a function of time and solar wind speed. Solar wind speed (vsw) is divided into ten quantiles. Thirteen month smoothed SIDC Sunspot Number (SSN, dashed black) is plotted on the secondary y-axis. The legend indicates the middle of a given vsw quantile and the Spearman rank correlation coefficient between AHe and SSN for that quantile. In effect, this figure updates Fig. (1) of Kasp… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Plots characterizing the cross correlation coeffi￾cient as a function of solar wind speed (vsw) for the observed (empty markers) and delayed (filled markers) SSN using 250 day averages. The marker color and shape match the style of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Helium abundance (AHe) as a function of (a) ob￾served and (b) delayed SSN in one example vsw quantile. A line connects the points to aid the eye. Line and marker color correspond to the number of days since mission start. Marker shape matches the quantile in previous figures. This vsw quantile covers the range 347 km s−1 < vsw ≤ 363 km s−1 . A green, dashed line presents a robust fit to each trend. The ins… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A summary of the zero solar activity helium abundance, AHe(SSN = 0), as a function of vsw for all ro￾bust fits in the fashion of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the relationship between solar wind helium to hydrogen abundance ratio ($A_\mathrm{He}$), solar wind speed ($v_\mathrm{SW}$), and sunspot number (SSN) over solar cycles 23 and 24. This is the first full 22-year Hale cycle measured with the Wind spacecraft covering a full cycle of the solar dynamo with two polarity reversals. While previous studies have established a strong correlation between $A_\mathrm{He}$ and SSN, we show that the phase delay between $A_\mathrm{He}$ and SSN is a monotonic increasing function of $v_\mathrm{SW}$. Correcting for this lag, $A_\mathrm{He}$ returns to the same value at a given SSN over all rising and falling phases and across solar wind speeds. We infer that this speed-dependent lag is a consequence of the mechanism that depletes slow wind $A_\mathrm{He}$ from its fast wind value during solar wind formation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes Wind spacecraft measurements of the solar wind helium abundance ratio A_He over the full 22-year interval spanning solar cycles 23 and 24. It reports that the phase lag between A_He and sunspot number (SSN) is a monotonic increasing function of solar wind speed v_SW. After subtracting these speed-dependent lags, the authors find that A_He collapses onto a single-valued relation with SSN that is independent of both the rising/falling phase of the cycle and of v_SW, and they interpret the lag itself as arising from the helium-depletion process that operates during formation of the slow solar wind.

Significance. If the reported speed-dependent phase lag and the subsequent collapse are robust, the result supplies a new observational constraint on the mechanisms that set the helium abundance during solar wind acceleration and on the connection between photospheric magnetic activity and in-situ composition. The use of a continuous 22-year dataset covering a complete Hale cycle is a clear strength relative to earlier shorter-interval studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (lag extraction procedure): the phase lag is obtained by maximizing the cross-correlation between speed-binned A_He and SSN time series. No tests are presented that quantify how the extracted lag depends on the finite ~11 yr segment length, on possible non-stationarity between cycles 23 and 24, or on the differing autocorrelation times of fast versus slow wind. Without such controls it remains possible that the reported monotonic increase of lag with v_SW is at least partly a statistical artifact of the extraction method rather than a physical depletion signature.
  2. [§4] §4 (post-correction collapse): after lag removal the claim that A_He returns to the same value at fixed SSN across all speeds and phases is presented visually but without quantitative metrics (e.g., rms scatter about the common relation or a statistical test for speed independence). Because the lag subtraction is performed on the same data used to demonstrate the collapse, an explicit demonstration that the collapse is not partly by construction is required to support the central inference.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 2] Figure 2: the panels showing the lag versus v_SW do not display uncertainty estimates on the lag values; adding bootstrap or Monte-Carlo error bars would clarify the statistical significance of the monotonic trend.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states that the dataset covers “two polarity reversals,” but the text does not explicitly confirm that both reversals fall inside the analyzed interval or discuss any polarity-dependent effects on A_He.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report and the opportunity to improve the manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the paper to incorporate the suggested analyses.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (lag extraction procedure): the phase lag is obtained by maximizing the cross-correlation between speed-binned A_He and SSN time series. No tests are presented that quantify how the extracted lag depends on the finite ~11 yr segment length, on possible non-stationarity between cycles 23 and 24, or on the differing autocorrelation times of fast versus slow wind. Without such controls it remains possible that the reported monotonic increase of lag with v_SW is at least partly a statistical artifact of the extraction method rather than a physical depletion signature.

    Authors: We agree that explicit robustness tests are required. In the revised manuscript we will augment §3 with three controls: (1) recomputation of lags on contiguous sub-intervals of varying length to quantify sensitivity to the ~11 yr window; (2) separate lag extraction for cycles 23 and 24 to test for non-stationarity; and (3) surrogate-data tests (phase-randomized time series preserving the observed autocorrelation) applied separately to fast- and slow-wind bins. These additions will demonstrate that the monotonic lag-vs-v_SW trend is not an artifact of the extraction procedure. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (post-correction collapse): after lag removal the claim that A_He returns to the same value at fixed SSN across all speeds and phases is presented visually but without quantitative metrics (e.g., rms scatter about the common relation or a statistical test for speed independence). Because the lag subtraction is performed on the same data used to demonstrate the collapse, an explicit demonstration that the collapse is not partly by construction is required to support the central inference.

    Authors: We concur that quantitative metrics and a control against construction bias are needed. The revised §4 will include: (i) the RMS scatter of lag-corrected A_He about the common SSN relation, (ii) a two-way ANOVA (or equivalent) testing for residual dependence on v_SW and cycle phase, and (iii) a control in which the observed lags are randomly reassigned (shuffled within the speed bins) before correction; we will show that the collapse does not occur under this randomization. These additions will confirm that the reported single-valued relation is not an artifact of applying the same lags to the same data. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational extraction of lags from time series data

full rationale

The paper reports direct measurements of the phase delay between A_He and SSN as a function of v_SW from Wind spacecraft data spanning solar cycles 23 and 24. The lag is extracted from the observed time series, then subtracted to demonstrate that A_He collapses to a unique SSN relation. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that define the reported lag in terms of the final collapsed relation or that force the monotonic speed dependence by construction. The central result remains an empirical observation from external data without reduction to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work is observational and relies on the established A_He-SSN correlation from prior studies plus standard assumptions about spacecraft data quality; no new free parameters, axioms, or entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption A strong correlation exists between A_He and SSN (from previous studies).
    Abstract states this correlation is already established and builds the new lag result on top of it.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5697 in / 1259 out tokens · 36030 ms · 2026-05-25T13:21:53.727871+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.co...

    work page

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" "doi:" doi * if FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix ":" * if eprint field.or.null * if FUNCTION format.pid eprint empty format.doi format.eprint if FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t...

    work page

  3. [3]

    - [1] #1 = = ^ ^ ^ .\!\!^ d .\!\!^ h .\!\!^ m .\!\!^ s .\!\!^ @mss

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.831784 2017

  4. [4]

    R., Lazarus, A

    Aellig, M. R., Lazarus, A. J., & Steinberg, J. T. 2001, Geophysical Research Letters, 28, 2767. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1029/2000GL012771

    work page doi:10.1029/2000gl012771 2001

  5. [5]

    L., Kasper, J

    Alterman, B. L., Kasper, J. C., Stevens, M. L., & Koval, A. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 864, 112. http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aad23f http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/864/i=2/a=112?key=crossref.70d30c5e4f4e09560b242739d2b64fbe

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad23f 2018

  6. [6]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 47, 481

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    T., & White, O

    Bachmann, K. T., & White, O. R. 1994, Solar Physics, 150, 347. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00712896

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00712896 1994

  8. [8]

    J., Asbridge, J

    Bame, S. J., Asbridge, J. R., Feldman, W. C., & Gosling, J. T. 1977, Journal of Geophysical Research, 82, 1487. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1029/JA082i010p01487

    work page doi:10.1029/ja082i010p01487 1977

  9. [9]

    Benz, A. O. 2008, Living Rev. Solar Phys, 5, 1. http://www.livingreviews.org/lrsp-2008-1

    work page 2008

  10. [10]

    T., Bame, S

    Borrini, G., Gosling, J. T., Bame, S. J., Feldman, W. C., & Wilcox, J. M. 1981, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 86, 4565. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1029/JA086iA06p04565

    work page doi:10.1029/ja086ia06p04565 1981

  11. [11]

    V., & Eselevich, V

    Eselevich, M. V., & Eselevich, V. G. 2006, Astronomy Reports, 50, 748

    work page 2006

  12. [12]

    Feldman, U., Landi, E., & Schwadron, N. A. 2005, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 110, 1

    work page 2005

  13. [13]

    C., Asbridge, J

    Feldman, W. C., Asbridge, J. R., Bame, S. J., & Gosling, J. T. 1978, Journal of Geophysical Research, 83, 2177

    work page 1978

  14. [14]

    Fisk, L. A. 2003, Journal of Geophysical Research, 108, 1157. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1029/2002JA009284

    work page doi:10.1029/2002ja009284 2003

  15. [15]

    Energy Balance in the Solar Transition Region. IV. Hydrogen and Helium Mass Flows With Diffusion

    Fontenla, J. M., Avrett, E. H., & Loeser, R. 2001, 636. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0109416

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  16. [16]

    M., Reichmann, E

    Fontenla, J. M., Reichmann, E. J., & Tandberg-Hanssen, E. 1988, The Astrophysical Journal, 329, 464. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/doi/10.1086/166392

    work page doi:10.1086/166392 1988

  17. [17]

    J., Velli, M

    Fox, N. J., Velli, M. C., Bale, S. D., et al. 2016, Space Science Reviews, 204, 7. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11214-015-0211-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-015-0211-6 2016

  18. [18]

    L., Smith, C

    Goelzer, M. L., Smith, C. W., Schwadron, N. A., & McCracken, K. G. 2013, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 118, 7525

    work page 2013

  19. [19]

    1973, Reviews of Geophysics, 11, 115

    Hirshberg, J. 1973, Reviews of Geophysics, 11, 115. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1029/RG011i001p00115

    work page doi:10.1029/rg011i001p00115 1973

  20. [20]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4160265/ http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=4160265

    work page arXiv 2007

  21. [21]

    C., Lazarus, A

    Kasper, J. C., Lazarus, A. J., & Gary, S. P. 2008, Physical Review Letters, 101, 261103. http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.261103

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.261103 2008

  22. [22]

    C., Lazarus, A

    Kasper, J. C., Lazarus, A. J., Steinberg, J. T., Ogilvie, K. W., & Szabo, A. 2006, Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, A03105. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1029/2005JA011442

    work page doi:10.1029/2005ja011442 2006

  23. [23]

    C., Stevens, M

    Kasper, J. C., Stevens, M. L., Korreck, K. E., et al. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 745, 162. http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/745/i=2/a=162?key=crossref.3243440b8824f281eaf92619ea6e90c4

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    C., Stevens, M

    Kasper, J. C., Stevens, M. L., Lazarus, A. J., Steinberg, J. T., & Ogilvie, K. W. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 660, 901. http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/660/i=1/a=901

    work page 2007

  25. [25]

    C., Abiad, R., Austin, G., et al

    Kasper, J. C., Abiad, R., Austin, G., et al. 2016, Space Science Reviews, 204, 131. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11214-015-0206-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-015-0206-3 2016

  26. [26]

    C., Klein, K

    Kasper, J. C., Klein, K. G., Weber, T., et al. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 849, 126. http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/849/i=2/a=126?key=crossref.a4fda357a12d19fd2ad1aa8a3897c78f

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    2016, Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas, 87

    Kluyver, T., Ragan-kelley, B., P \' e rez, F., et al. 2016, Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas, 87

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    Laming, J. M. 2004, The Astrophysical Journal, 614, 1063. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...614.1063L

    work page 2004

  29. [29]

    2015, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 12, doi:10.1007/lrsp-2015-2

    ---. 2015, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 12, doi:10.1007/lrsp-2015-2

    work page doi:10.1007/lrsp-2015-2 2015

  30. [30]

    M., & Feldman, U

    Laming, J. M., & Feldman, U. 2003, The Astrophysical Journal, 591, 1257

    work page 2003

  31. [31]

    A., & Kasper, J

    Maruca, B. A., & Kasper, J. C. 2013, Advances in Space Research, 52, 723. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.04.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.asr.2013.04.006 2013

  32. [32]

    Mauas, P. J. D., Andretta, V., Falchi, A., et al. 2005, The Astrophysical Journal, 619, 604

    work page 2005

  33. [33]

    2010, in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, ed

    Mckinney, W. 2010, in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, ed. S. van der Walt & J. Millman, 51 -- 56

    work page 2010

  34. [34]

    P., Rimmele, T

    McMullin, J. P., Rimmele, T. R., Warner, M., et al. 2016, 99061B. http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?doi=10.1117/12.2235227

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2235227 2016

  35. [35]

    Meyer, J. P. 1991, Advances in Space Research, 11, 269

    work page 1991

  36. [36]

    1993, Advances in Space Research, 13, 377

    ---. 1993, Advances in Space Research, 13, 377

    work page 1993

  37. [37]

    J., & Aivazis, M

    Millman, K. J., & Aivazis, M. 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering, 13, 9. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5725235/

    work page arXiv 2011

  38. [38]

    M \" u ller, D., Marsden, R. G., St. Cyr, O. C., & Gilbert, H. R. 2013, Solar Physics, 285, 25

    work page 2013

  39. [39]

    W., Chornay, D

    Ogilvie, K. W., Chornay, D. J., Fritzenreiter, R. J., et al. 1995, Space Science Reviews, 71, 55. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00751326

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00751326 1995

  40. [40]

    Oliphant, T. E. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 10. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4160250/

    work page arXiv 2007

  41. [41]

    2001, in IAU Symposium, Vol

    \" O zg \" u c , A., & Ata c , T. 2001, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 203, Recent Insights into the Physics of the Sun and Heliosphere: Highlights from SOHO and Other Space Missions, ed. P. Brekke, B. Fleck, & J. B. Gurman, 125. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001IAUS..203..125O

    work page 2001

  42. [42]

    Perez, F., & Granger, B. E. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 21. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4160251/

    work page arXiv 2007

  43. [43]

    E., & Laming, J

    Rakowski, C. E., & Laming, J. M. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 754, 65

    work page 2012

  44. [44]

    B., & Vasantharaju, N

    Ramesh, K. B., & Vasantharaju, N. 2014, Astrophysics and Space Science, 350, 479

    work page 2014

  45. [45]

    A., Fisk, L

    Schwadron, N. A., Fisk, L. A., & Zurbuchen, T. H. 1999, The Astrophysical Journal, 521, 859

    work page 1999

  46. [46]

    2006, Space Science Reviews, 124, 51

    Schwenn, R. 2006, Space Science Reviews, 124, 51

    work page 2006

  47. [47]

    SILSO World Data Center . 2018

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    T., Landi, E., Tracy, P., & Zurbuchen, T

    Stakhiv, M., Lepri, S. T., Landi, E., Tracy, P., & Zurbuchen, T. H. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 829, 117. http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/829/i=2/a=117?key=crossref.b0b55b70491e273f167cae33b403f34c

    work page 2016

  49. [49]

    2003, Solar Physics, 215, 111

    Temmer, M., Veronig, A., & Hanslmeier, A. 2003, Solar Physics, 215, 111

    work page 2003

  50. [50]

    C., & Varoquaux, G

    van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering, 13, 22. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5725236/

    work page arXiv 2011

  51. [51]

    van Driel-Gesztelyi, L., & Green, L. M. 2015, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 12, 1. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/lrsp-2015-1

    work page doi:10.1007/lrsp-2015-1 2015

  52. [52]

    Vanlommel, P., Cugnon, P., Van Der Linden, R. A. M., Berghmans, D., & Clette, F. 2005, Solar Physics, 224, 113

    work page 2005

  53. [53]

    1991, in Challenges to Theories of the Structure of Moderate-Mass Stars (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg), 37--41

    Vauclair, S., & Charbonnel, C. 1991, in Challenges to Theories of the Structure of Moderate-Mass Stars (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg), 37--41. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/3-540-54420-8_48

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-54420-8_48 1991