pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.01193 · v2 · pith:CAHO72K2new · submitted 2019-07-02 · 💻 cs.CV

Inverse Attention Guided Deep Crowd Counting Network

Vishwanath A. Sindagi , Vishal M. Patel This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 11:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords crowd countinginverse attentiondeep neural networksVGG-16segmentation guidancecongested scenesattention mechanismsdensity estimation
0
0 comments X

The pith

IA-DCCN improves crowd counting by infusing segmentation information through an inverse attention mechanism into a VGG-16 network without extra annotations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a deep network for counting people in congested scenes that adds an inverse attention step to bring segmentation cues into the counting process. This runs as a single training stage on a VGG-16 backbone and needs no new labels or separate models. The added mechanism produces measurable accuracy gains on three standard datasets while keeping extra computation small. A reader would care because many real-world safety and planning tasks depend on reliable head counts in dense areas, and this method avoids the usual costs of multi-stage or multi-label training.

Core claim

The central claim is that segmentation information can be efficiently infused into a counting network via an inverse attention mechanism, yielding significant performance improvements. The resulting IA-DCCN framework is built on VGG-16, requires only a single training step, adds minimal overhead, and needs no additional annotations beyond what the counting task already uses.

What carries the argument

The inverse attention mechanism that infuses segmentation information into the counting network.

If this is right

  • The method achieves significant improvements over several recent methods on three challenging crowd counting datasets.
  • The approach adds minimal computational overhead and requires no additional annotations.
  • The single-step training framework remains simple to implement while delivering the reported gains.
  • Segmentation guidance through inverse attention produces measurable counting benefits without separate training stages.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same inverse-attention pattern could be tested on other dense-prediction tasks such as object density estimation in microscopy or cell counting.
  • If the segmentation cues are generated from the counting network itself rather than an external model, the method might become fully self-supervised.
  • Real-time deployment would require measuring whether the added attention block increases latency enough to matter in video surveillance pipelines.

Load-bearing premise

Segmentation information can be reliably derived and infused via the inverse attention mechanism to produce counting gains without any additional annotations or separate training stages.

What would settle it

An ablation experiment in which the inverse attention module is removed and the network is retrained on the same three datasets shows no drop in counting accuracy relative to the full model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.01193 by Vishal M. Patel, Vishwanath A. Sindagi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Feature map visualization: (a) Input image, (b) Feature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of the proposed Inverse Attention Guided Deep Crowd Counting Network (IA-DCCN). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Inverse attention block. background regions we are automatically suppressing the background information from the feature maps of the DRU, hence, making it easier for the density module (DM) to learn the features more effectively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Sample results of the proposed method on the ShanghaiTech dataset [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Sample results of the proposed method on the UCF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this paper, we address the challenging problem of crowd counting in congested scenes. Specifically, we present Inverse Attention Guided Deep Crowd Counting Network (IA-DCCN) that efficiently infuses segmentation information through an inverse attention mechanism into the counting network, resulting in significant improvements. The proposed method, which is based on VGG-16, is a single-step training framework and is simple to implement. The use of segmentation information results in minimal computational overhead and does not require any additional annotations. We demonstrate the significance of segmentation guided inverse attention through a detailed analysis and ablation study. Furthermore, the proposed method is evaluated on three challenging crowd counting datasets and is shown to achieve significant improvements over several recent methods.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes the Inverse Attention Guided Deep Crowd Counting Network (IA-DCCN), a VGG-16-based architecture that infuses segmentation information into the counting pipeline via an inverse attention mechanism. It asserts a single-step training framework that requires no additional annotations, incurs only minimal computational overhead, includes an ablation study demonstrating the value of the segmentation guidance, and reports significant improvements over recent methods on three challenging crowd counting datasets.

Significance. If the segmentation source can be generated on-the-fly from existing point annotations without introducing leakage or hidden multi-stage costs, and if the inverse attention demonstrably supplies complementary cues that improve counting accuracy, the approach would offer a lightweight, easy-to-implement enhancement to standard density-estimation pipelines. The single-step VGG-16 design and explicit ablation are positive features for reproducibility. However, the significance is currently difficult to gauge because the abstract supplies no quantitative metrics, error bars, or architectural diagrams, and the mechanism for obtaining segmentation maps remains unspecified.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that segmentation information is infused 'without any additional annotations' and with 'minimal computational overhead' in a 'single-step training framework' is load-bearing for the entire contribution, yet the abstract provides no description of how the segmentation maps are derived (e.g., from dilated point annotations, density-map thresholding, or an external model). Without this mechanism, it is impossible to verify that the inverse attention supplies independent cues rather than re-encoding counting information already present in the density supervision.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the manuscript asserts 'significant improvements' and a 'detailed analysis and ablation study' on three datasets, but supplies no quantitative results, MAE/MSE values, comparisons, or statistical details. This absence prevents assessment of whether the reported gains are practically meaningful or statistically reliable, directly undermining the empirical support for the method's superiority.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract repeatedly uses the phrase 'significant improvements' without defining the baseline methods or the magnitude of gains; a brief quantitative statement would improve clarity even in the abstract.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We agree that the abstract requires additional detail to fully support the central claims and will revise it accordingly. Our point-by-point responses to the major comments follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that segmentation information is infused 'without any additional annotations' and with 'minimal computational overhead' in a 'single-step training framework' is load-bearing for the entire contribution, yet the abstract provides no description of how the segmentation maps are derived (e.g., from dilated point annotations, density-map thresholding, or an external model). Without this mechanism, it is impossible to verify that the inverse attention supplies independent cues rather than re-encoding counting information already present in the density supervision.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract is concise and omits the derivation process. The full manuscript (Section 3) specifies that segmentation maps are generated on-the-fly from the existing point annotations via density-map thresholding to produce binary crowd/background masks; no external model or additional labels are used. The inverse attention then operates on these masks to suppress non-crowd features, supplying cues complementary to the density supervision. We will revise the abstract to include a brief description of this mechanism. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the manuscript asserts 'significant improvements' and a 'detailed analysis and ablation study' on three datasets, but supplies no quantitative results, MAE/MSE values, comparisons, or statistical details. This absence prevents assessment of whether the reported gains are practically meaningful or statistically reliable, directly undermining the empirical support for the method's superiority.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative results would strengthen the abstract. We will revise the abstract to report the key MAE/MSE values on the three datasets along with the observed improvements relative to recent baselines. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical architecture with no derivations or self-referential fits

full rationale

The paper proposes an empirical CNN architecture (VGG-16 based IA-DCCN) that incorporates segmentation cues via inverse attention. No equations, derivations, uniqueness theorems, or parameter-fitting steps are present in the provided text. The central claim rests on experimental results across three datasets rather than any mathematical reduction of outputs to inputs by construction. No self-citation load-bearing steps or ansatz smuggling are identifiable. The work is self-contained as an architecture proposal and ablation study.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; full architecture, loss functions, and training details unavailable. Expected free parameters include all network weights and attention scaling factors fitted during end-to-end training on crowd datasets. No invented physical entities. Axioms are standard deep-learning assumptions such as VGG-16 feature extractors being transferable.

free parameters (1)
  • network weights and attention scaling factors
    All parameters of the VGG-16 backbone plus the inverse attention module are learned from data during the single-step training.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption VGG-16 pretrained features are suitable as backbone for both segmentation and density estimation branches
    Abstract states the method is based on VGG-16 without further justification.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5639 in / 1260 out tokens · 23608 ms · 2026-05-25T11:22:52.152437+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Arteta, V

    C. Arteta, V . Lempitsky, and A. Zisserman. Counting in the wild. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 483–498. Springer, 2016. 2

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    J. Ba, V . Mnih, and K. Kavukcuoglu. Multiple object recog- nition with visual attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.7755,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    Babu Sam, N

    D. Babu Sam, N. N. Sajjan, R. Venkatesh Babu, and M. Srinivasan. Divide and grow: Capturing huge diversity in crowd images with incrementally growing cnn. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3618–3626, 2018. 2, 5

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Boominathan, S

    L. Boominathan, S. S. Kruthiventi, and R. V . Babu. Crowd- net: A deep convolutional network for dense crowd counting. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Multimedia Conference, pages 640–644. ACM, 2016. 2

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    A. B. Chan, Z.-S. J. Liang, and N. Vasconcelos. Privacy pre- serving crowd monitoring: Counting people without people models or tracking. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recog- nition, 2008. CVPR 2008. IEEE Conference on , pages 1–7. IEEE, 2008. 1

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    K. Chen, C. C. Loy, S. Gong, and T. Xiang. Feature mining for localised crowd counting. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 2012. 2

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    L. Chen, H. Zhang, J. Xiao, L. Nie, J. Shao, W. Liu, and T.-S. Chua. Sca-cnn: Spatial and channel-wise attention in convolutional networks for image captioning. In 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recog- nition (CVPR), pages 6298–6306. IEEE, 2017. 2, 3

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    S. Chen, X. Tan, B. Wang, and X. Hu. Reverse attention for salient object detection. In Proceedings of the Euro- pean Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) , pages 234– 250, 2018. 2

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    J. Dai, K. He, and J. Sun. Instance-aware semantic segmen- tation via multi-task network cascades. InProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion, pages 3150–3158, 2016. 1, 3

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Hariharan, P

    B. Hariharan, P. Arbel ´aez, R. Girshick, and J. Malik. Si- multaneous detection and segmentation. In European Con- ference on Computer Vision, pages 297–312. Springer, 2014. 3

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    Idrees, I

    H. Idrees, I. Saleemi, C. Seibert, and M. Shah. Multi-source multi-scale counting in extremely dense crowd images. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2547–2554, 2013. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    Idrees, M

    H. Idrees, M. Tayyab, K. Athrey, D. Zhang, S. Al-Maadeed, N. Rajpoot, and M. Shah. Composition loss for counting, density map estimation and localization in dense crowds. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 544–559. Springer, 2018. 4, 5, 6

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Lempitsky and A

    V . Lempitsky and A. Zisserman. Learning to count objects in images. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 1324–1332, 2010. 2

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    M. Li, Z. Zhang, K. Huang, and T. Tan. Estimating the num- ber of people in crowded scenes by mid based foreground segmentation and head-shoulder detection. InPattern Recog- nition, 2008. ICPR 2008. 19th International Conference on , pages 1–4. IEEE, 2008. 2

    work page 2008

  15. [15]

    T. Li, H. Chang, M. Wang, B. Ni, R. Hong, and S. Yan. Crowded scene analysis: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 25(3):367–386,

    work page

  16. [16]

    W. Li, V . Mahadevan, and N. Vasconcelos. Anomaly detec- tion and localization in crowded scenes. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , 36(1):18–32,

    work page

  17. [17]

    Y . Li, X. Zhang, and D. Chen. Csrnet: Dilated convo- lutional neural networks for understanding the highly con- gested scenes. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 1091– 1100, 2018. 2, 5

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    H. Liu, J. Feng, M. Qi, J. Jiang, and S. Yan. End-to-end comparative attention networks for person re-identification. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 26(7):3492–3506,

    work page

  19. [19]

    X. Liu, J. van de Weijer, and A. D. Bagdanov. Leveraging unlabeled data for crowd counting by learning to rank. InThe IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion (CVPR), June 2018. 2

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    Online Batch Selection for Faster Training of Neural Networks

    I. Loshchilov and F. Hutter. Online batch selection for faster training of neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06343, 2015. 4

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  21. [21]

    C. C. Loy, K. Chen, S. Gong, and T. Xiang. Crowd counting and profiling: Methodology and evaluation. In Modeling, Simulation and Visual Analysis of Crowds , pages 347–382. Springer, 2013. 2

    work page 2013

  22. [22]

    J. Lu, J. Yang, D. Batra, and D. Parikh. Hierarchical question-image co-attention for visual question answering. In Advances In Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 289–297, 2016. 2

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    Mahadevan, W

    V . Mahadevan, W. Li, V . Bhalodia, and N. Vasconcelos. Anomaly detection in crowded scenes. In CVPR, volume 249, page 250, 2010. 1

    work page 2010

  24. [24]

    Marsden, K

    M. Marsden, K. McGuinness, S. Little, C. E. Keogh, and N. E. O’Connor. People, penguins and petri dishes: Adapt- ing object counting models to new visual domains and object types without forgetting. In The IEEE Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2018. 1

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Onoro-Rubio and R

    D. Onoro-Rubio and R. J. L ´opez-Sastre. Towards perspective-free object counting with deep learning. In Eu- ropean Conference on Computer Vision , pages 615–629. Springer, 2016. 1, 2

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    V .-Q. Pham, T. Kozakaya, O. Yamaguchi, and R. Okada. Count forest: Co-voting uncertain number of targets using random forest for crowd density estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 3253–3261, 2015. 2

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    Ranjan, V

    R. Ranjan, V . Patel, and R. Chellappa. Hyperface: A deep multi-task learning framework for face detection, landmark localization, pose estimation, and gender recognition. IEEE transactions on PAMI, 2016. 1, 3

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    Rodriguez, I

    M. Rodriguez, I. Laptev, J. Sivic, and J.-Y . Audibert. Density-aware person detection and tracking in crowds. In 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 2423–2430. IEEE, 2011. 1

    work page 2011

  29. [29]

    D. Ryan, S. Denman, C. Fookes, and S. Sridharan. Crowd counting using multiple local features. In Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications, 2009. DICTA’09., pages 81–88. IEEE, 2009. 2

    work page 2009

  30. [30]

    D. B. Sam and R. V . Babu. Top-down feedback for crowd counting convolutional neural network. In Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2018. 1, 5

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    D. B. Sam, S. Surya, and R. V . Babu. Switching convolu- tional neural network for crowd counting. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2017. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Action Recognition using Visual Attention

    S. Sharma, R. Kiros, and R. Salakhutdinov. Action recogni- tion using visual attention.arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.04119,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Shrivastava, A

    A. Shrivastava, A. Gupta, and R. Girshick. Training region- based object detectors with online hard example mining. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 761–769, 2016. 4

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    Sindagi and V

    V . Sindagi and V . Patel. Dafe-fd: Density aware feature en- richment for face detection. In2019 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) , pages 2185–

    work page

  35. [35]

    V . A. Sindagi and V . M. Patel. Cnn-based cascaded multi- task learning of high-level prior and density estimation for crowd counting. In Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS), 2017 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2017. 5, 6

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    V . A. Sindagi and V . M. Patel. Generating high-quality crowd density maps using contextual pyramid cnns. In The IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , Oct

    work page

  37. [37]

    V . A. Sindagi and V . M. Patel. A survey of recent advances in cnn-based single image crowd counting and density esti- mation. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2017. 2

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    C. Song, Y . Huang, W. Ouyang, and L. Wang. Mask-guided contrastive attention model for person re-identification. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1179–1188, 2018. 2, 3

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    Walach and L

    E. Walach and L. Wolf. Learning to count with cnn boosting. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 660–

    work page

  40. [40]

    C. Wang, H. Zhang, L. Yang, S. Liu, and X. Cao. Deep people counting in extremely dense crowds. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM international conference on Multimedia , pages 1299–1302. ACM, 2015. 2

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    T. Xiao, Y . Xu, K. Yang, J. Zhang, Y . Peng, and Z. Zhang. The application of two-level attention models in deep convo- lutional neural network for fine-grained image classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 842–850, 2015. 2

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    Xu and G

    B. Xu and G. Qiu. Crowd density estimation based on rich features and random projection forest. In 2016 IEEE Win- ter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), pages 1–8. IEEE, 2016. 2

    work page 2016

  43. [43]

    Q. You, H. Jin, Z. Wang, C. Fang, and J. Luo. Image caption- ing with semantic attention. In Proceedings of the IEEE con- ference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 4651–4659, 2016. 2

    work page 2016

  44. [44]

    B. Zhan, D. N. Monekosso, P. Remagnino, S. A. Velastin, and L.-Q. Xu. Crowd analysis: a survey. Machine Vision and Applications, 19(5-6):345–357, 2008. 1

    work page 2008

  45. [45]

    Zhang, H

    C. Zhang, H. Li, X. Wang, and X. Yang. Cross-scene crowd counting via deep convolutional neural networks. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 833–841, 2015. 1, 2, 5

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    Zhang, D

    Y . Zhang, D. Zhou, S. Chen, S. Gao, and Y . Ma. Single- image crowd counting via multi-column convolutional neu- ral network. InProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 589–597, 2016. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    F. Zhu, X. Wang, and N. Yu. Crowd tracking with dynamic evolution of group structures. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 139–154. Springer, 2014. 1

    work page 2014