REVIEW 2 cited by
Conditioned-U-Net: Introducing a Control Mechanism in the U-Net for Multiple Source Separations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Data-driven models for audio source separation such as U-Net or Wave-U-Net are usually models dedicated to and specifically trained for a single task, e.g. a particular instrument isolation. Training them for various tasks at once commonly results in worse performances than training them for a single specialized task. In this work, we introduce the Conditioned-U-Net (C-U-Net) which adds a control mechanism to the standard U-Net. The control mechanism allows us to train a unique and generic U-Net to perform the separation of various instruments. The C-U-Net decides the instrument to isolate according to a one-hot-encoding input vector. The input vector is embedded to obtain the parameters that control Feature-wise Linear Modulation (FiLM) layers. FiLM layers modify the U-Net feature maps in order to separate the desired instrument via affine transformations. The C-U-Net performs different instrument separations, all with a single model achieving the same performances as the dedicated ones at a lower cost.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
User-guided Generative Source Separation
GuideSep separates arbitrary target instruments from a mixture using user-provided waveform mimicry and mel-spectrogram masks, and outperforms a same-architecture mask-prediction baseline in SDR and listening tests.
-
Data-Driven Radio Propagation Modeling using Graph Neural Networks
A graph neural network with grid and ray-tracing edges, trained with masked outputs on real-world 4G measurements, generates radio coverage maps with 8.5 dB RMSE on outdoor data and 0.18 s GPU inference.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.