pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.02164 · v2 · pith:2PBVASGAnew · submitted 2019-07-04 · ⚛️ nucl-ex

Precision Beta Decay as a Probe of New Physics

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 02:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-ex
keywords beta decaynew physicsprecision measurementsStandard Model testsnuclear beta decayworkshop summary
0
0 comments X

The pith

Precision beta-decay experiments can probe new physics beyond the Standard Model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper summarizes discussions from recent workshops on the sensitivity of precision beta-decay experiments to new physics. It reviews how measurements of decay rates, spectra, and angular correlations in nuclear and neutron beta decay can reveal contributions outside the Standard Model. A sympathetic reader would care because these tabletop-scale experiments offer a route to test high-energy phenomena at low energies. The document outlines current experimental reach and planned improvements in the field.

Core claim

Precision beta-decay experiments have the potential sensitivity to probe new physics.

What carries the argument

Measurements of beta-decay observables such as rates, spectra, and correlation coefficients to detect deviations from Standard Model predictions.

If this is right

  • Experiments can constrain or detect new scalar and tensor weak interactions.
  • Precision data provide limits on beyond-Standard-Model contributions at energy scales complementary to colliders.
  • Improved measurements in selected nuclei and the neutron can tighten bounds on specific new physics parameters.
  • Future upgrades in detector technology and statistics will expand the searchable parameter space.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Combining beta-decay results with other low-energy probes could strengthen overall constraints on new interactions.
  • Focus on particular isotopes with favorable nuclear structure may optimize experimental sensitivity.
  • The approach could extend to searches for time-reversal violation or other discrete symmetries in the same systems.

Load-bearing premise

Deviations from Standard Model expectations in beta decay can be cleanly attributed to new physics rather than unaccounted experimental or theoretical effects.

What would settle it

Demonstration that all beta-decay observables remain consistent with the Standard Model even after reaching the precision levels discussed in the workshops.

read the original abstract

The document presents a summary of discussions at recent workshops at the Amherst Center for Fundamental Interactions at Amherst, MA, and at the European Centre for Theoretical Studies in Nuclear Physics and Related Areas at Trento, Italy, on the potential sensitivity of precision beta-decay experiments towards new physics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a summary of discussions from workshops at the Amherst Center for Fundamental Interactions and at ECT* in Trento concerning the potential sensitivity of precision beta-decay experiments to new physics beyond the Standard Model.

Significance. As a workshop summary, the document provides a high-level overview of experimental prospects in nuclear beta decay for constraining BSM physics; its value lies in collating community perspectives rather than in new derivations or data.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and title are consistent with the summary nature of the document, but the manuscript would benefit from a brief statement on the selection criteria for the topics discussed at the workshops.
  2. Consider adding a short section or table listing the specific observables (e.g., correlation coefficients, lifetimes) highlighted in the discussions for improved clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript as a workshop summary and for the recommendation to accept. We appreciate the recognition that its primary value lies in collating community perspectives on the sensitivity of precision beta-decay experiments to BSM physics rather than presenting new derivations or data.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Workshop summary document with no derivations or quantitative claims

full rationale

The paper is explicitly a summary of workshop discussions at Amherst and Trento on the sensitivity of precision beta-decay experiments to new physics. No equations, derivations, parameter fits, or predictions are advanced whose validity depends on internal reduction to inputs. The central claim is presented as the outcome of external discussions rather than a self-contained technical result. No self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked in a load-bearing way. This is a standard non-finding for summary documents.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No original model, derivation, or quantitative analysis is presented in the available text; this is a review-style summary document.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5571 in / 890 out tokens · 16015 ms · 2026-05-25T02:46:20.781929+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    M. E. Peskin, Annalen der Physik 528, 20 (2016)

  2. [2]

    Gonzalez-Alonso, O

    M. Gonzalez-Alonso, O. Naviliat-Cuncic, and N. Sever- ijns, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 104, 165 (2019)

  3. [3]

    Semileptonic decays of light quarks beyond the Standard Model

    V. Cirigliano, J. Jenkins, and M. Gonzalez-Alonso, Nucl. Phys. B830, 95 (2010), arXiv:0908.1754 [hep-ph]

  4. [4]

    Bhattacharya, V

    T. Bhattacharya, V. Cirigliano, S. D. Cohen, A. Fil- ipuzzi, M. Gonz´ alez-Alonso, M. L. Graesser, R. Gupta, and H.-W. Lin, Phys. Rev. D 85, 054512 (2012)

  5. [5]

    Cirigliano, M

    V. Cirigliano, M. Gonz´ alez-Alonso, and M. L. Graesser, Journal of High Energy Physics 2013, 46 (2013)

  6. [6]

    Cirigliano, S

    V. Cirigliano, S. Gardner, and B. R. Holstein, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 71, 93 (2013)

  7. [7]

    Alioli, V

    S. Alioli, V. Cirigliano, W. Dekens, J. de Vries, and E. Mereghetti, JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS (2017), 10.1007/JHEP05(2017)086

  8. [8]

    Charged Current Universality and the MSSM

    S. Bauman, J. Erler, and M. Ramsey-Musolf, Phys. Rev. D87, 035012 (2013), arXiv:1204.0035 [hep-ph]

  9. [9]

    J. C. Hardy and I. S. Towner, Phys. Rev. C91, 025501 (2015), arXiv:1411.5987 [nucl-ex]

  10. [10]

    C.-Y. Seng, M. Gorchtein, H. H. Patel, and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 241804 (2018)

  11. [11]

    Czarnecki, W

    A. Czarnecki, W. J. Marciano, and A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. D 70, 093006 (2004)

  12. [12]

    FLAG Review 2019

    S. Aoki et al., arXiv:1902.08191 [hep-lat] (2019), https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.08191

  13. [13]

    C. Y. Seng, M. Gorchtein, and M. J. Ramsey- Musolf, arXiv:1812.03352 [nucl-th] (2018), https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.03352v2

  14. [14]

    Seng and U.-G

    C.-Y. Seng and U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 211802 (2019)

  15. [15]

    Gorchtein, arXiv:1812.04229v2 [nucl-th] (2019), https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.04229v2

    M. Gorchtein, arXiv:1812.04229v2 [nucl-th] (2019), https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.04229v2

  16. [16]

    Beta Decay as a Probe of New Physics

    Workshop on “Beta Decay as a Probe of New Physics” at Amherst Center for Fundamental Interactions, Nov. 1- 3, 2018; https://www.physics.umass.edu/acfi/seminars- 10 and-workshops/beta-decay-as-a-probe-of-new-physics

  17. [17]

    Precise Beta Decay Calculations for Searches for New Physics

    Workshop on “Precise Beta Decay Calculations for Searches for New Physics” at European Centre for Theoretical Studies in Nuclear Physics and Related Areas (Trento, Italy), Apr. 8-12, 2019; https://indico.ectstar.eu/event/42/timetable/#20190408

  18. [18]

    Navr´ atil, B

    P. Navr´ atil, B. R. Barrett, and W. E. Ormand, Phys. Rev. C 56, 2542 (1997)

  19. [19]

    Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of weak transitions in $A\,$=$\,$6--10 nuclei

    S. Pastore, A. Baroni, J. Carlson, S. Gandolfi, S. C. Pieper, R. Schiavilla, and R. B. Wiringa, Phys. Rev. C97, 022501 (2018), arXiv:1709.03592 [nucl-th]

  20. [20]

    Poˇ cani´ c, R

    D. Poˇ cani´ c, R. Alarcon, L. Alonzi, S. Baessler, S. Bal- ascuta, J. Bowman, M. Bychkov, J. Byrne, J. Calarco, V. Cianciolo, C. Crawford, E. Frlez, M. Gericke, G. Greene, R. Grzywacz, V. Gudkov, F. Hersman, A. Klein, J. Martin, S. Page, A. Palladino, S. Penttila, K. Rykaczewski, W. Wilburn, A. Young, and G. Young, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Phys...

  21. [21]

    Dubbers, H

    D. Dubbers, H. Abele, S. Baeler, B. Mrkisch, M. Schu- mann, T. Soldner, and O. Zimmer, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Acceler- ators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equip- ment 596, 238 (2008)

  22. [22]

    Darius, W

    G. Darius, W. A. Byron, C. R. DeAngelis, M. T. Hassan, F. E. Wietfeldt, B. Collett, G. L. Jones, M. S. Dewey, M. P. Mendenhall, J. S. Nico, H. Park, A. Komives, and E. J. Stephenson, Physical Review Letters 119, 042502 (2017)

  23. [23]

    Schmidt, Proceedings of the Particle Physics with Slow Neutrons Conference, PPNS 2018 (2019)

    C. Schmidt, Proceedings of the Particle Physics with Slow Neutrons Conference, PPNS 2018 (2019)

  24. [24]

    Chang, A

    C. Chang, A. N. Nicholson, E. Rinaldi, E. Berkowitz, N. N. Garron, D. A. Brantley, H. Monge-Camacho, C. J. Monahan, C. Bouchard, M. A. Clark, B. Jo, T. Kurth, K. Orginos, P. Vranas, and A. Walker-Loud, Nature558, 91 (2018)

  25. [25]

    Gupta, Y.-C

    R. Gupta, Y.-C. Jang, B. Yoon, H.-W. Lin, V. Cirigliano, and T. Bhattacharya ([Precision Neutron Decay Matrix Elements (PNDME) Collaboration]), Phys. Rev. D 98, 034503 (2018)

  26. [26]

    Naviliat-Cuncic and N

    O. Naviliat-Cuncic and N. Severijns, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 142302 (2009)

  27. [27]

    Fenker, A

    B. Fenker, A. Gorelov, D. Melconian, J. A. Behr, M. An- holm, D. Ashery, R. S. Behling, I. Cohen, I. Craiciu, G. Gwinner, J. McNeil, M. Mehlman, K. Olchanski, P. D. Shidling, S. Smale, and C. L. Warner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 062502 (2018)

  28. [28]

    Gonzlez-Alonso, O

    M. Gonzlez-Alonso, O. Naviliat-Cuncic, and N. Sever- ijns, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 104, 165 (2019)

  29. [29]

    Bodek, L

    K. Bodek, L. D. and, Keukeleere, M. Kolodziej, A. Kozela, M. Kuzniak, K. Lojek, M. Perkowski, H. Przy- bilski, K. Pysz, D. Rozpedzik, N. Severijns, T. Soldner, A. R. Young, and Zejma, Proceedings of the Parti- cle Physics with Slow Neutrons Conference, PPNS 2018 (2019)

  30. [30]

    Konrad, Private communication (2018)

    G. Konrad, Private communication (2018)

  31. [31]

    Naviliat-Cuncic, AIP Conf

    O. Naviliat-Cuncic, AIP Conf. Proc. 1753, 060001 (2016)

  32. [32]

    Huyan, O

    X. Huyan, O. Naviliat-Cuncic, P. Voytas, S. Chandavar, M. Hughes, K. Minamisono, and S. Paulauskas, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 879, 134 (2018)

  33. [33]

    D. M. Asner, R. F. Bradley, L. de Viveiros, P. J. Doe, J. L. Fernandes, M. Fertl, E. C. Finn, J. A. Formag- gio, D. Furse, A. M. Jones, J. N. Kofron, B. H. LaRoque, M. Leber, E. L. McBride, M. L. Miller, P. Mohanmurthy, B. Monreal, N. S. Oblath, R. G. H. Robertson, L. J. Rosenberg, G. Rybka, D. Rysewyk, M. G. Sternberg, J. R. Tedeschi, T. Th¨ ummler, B. A...

  34. [34]

    Hayen, N

    L. Hayen, N. Severijns, K. Bodek, D. Rozpedzik, and X. Mougeot, Reviews of Modern Physics 90, 015008 (2018)

  35. [35]

    F. E. Wietfeldt and G. L. Greene, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1173 (2011)

  36. [36]

    Mumm, Science 360, 605 (2018)

    P. Mumm, Science 360, 605 (2018)

  37. [37]

    A. P. Serebrov, V. E. Varlamov, A. G. Kharitonov, A. K. Fomin, Y. N. Pokotilovski, P. Geltenbort, I. A. Krasnoschekova, M. S. Lasakov, R. R. Taldaev, A. V. Vassiljev, and O. M. Zherebtsov, Phys. Rev. C 78, 035505 (2008)

  38. [38]

    R. W. Pattie, N. B. Callahan, C. Cude-Woods, E. R. Adamek, L. J. Broussard, S. M. Clayton, S. A. Currie, E. B. Dees, X. Ding, E. M. Engel, D. E. Fellers, W. Fox, P. Geltenbort, K. P. Hickerson, M. A. Hoffbauer, A. T. Holley, A. Komives, C.-Y. Liu, S. W. T. MacDonald, M. Makela, C. L. Morris, J. D. Ortiz, J. Ramsey, D. J. Salvat, A. Saunders, S. J. Seestrom...

  39. [39]

    A. T. Yue, M. S. Dewey, D. M. Gilliam, G. L. Greene, A. B. Laptev, J. S. Nico, W. M. Snow, and F. E. Wiet- feldt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 222501 (2013)

  40. [40]

    Ezhov et al., J

    V. Ezhov et al., J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 110, 345 (2005)

  41. [41]

    V. F. Ezhov, A. Z. Andreev, G. Ban, B. A. Barazov, P. Geltenbort, A. G. Gushkov, V. A. Knyzakov, N. A. Kovrizhnykh, G. B. Krygin, O. Naviliat-Cuncic, and V. L. Ryabov, JETP Letters 107, 671 (2018)

  42. [42]

    B. A. Bazarov, V. F. Ezhov, N. A. Kovrizhnykh, V. L. Ryabov, A. Z. Andreev, A. G. Glushkov, V. A. Knyazkov, and G. B. Krygin, TECHNICAL PHYSICS LETTERS 42, 663 (2016)

  43. [43]

    W. Heil, M. Beck, et al., The τSPECT Experiment (2019)

  44. [44]

    Picker, Private communication (2019)

    R. Picker, Private communication (2019)

  45. [45]

    Leung and O

    K. Leung and O. Zimmer, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 611, 181 (2009), particle Physics with Slow Neutrons

  46. [46]

    Tang, Private communication (2019)

    Z. Tang, Private communication (2019)

  47. [47]

    A. P. Serebrov, E. A. Kolomensky, A. K. Fomin, I. A. Krasnoshchekova, A. V. Vassiljev, D. M. Prudnikov, I. V. Shoka, A. V. Chechkin, M. E. Chaikovskiy, V. E. Varlamov, S. N. Ivanov, A. N. Pirozhkov, P. Gel- tenbort, O. Zimmer, T. Jenke, M. Van der Grinten, and M. Tucker, PHYSICAL REVIEW C 97 (2018), 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.055503

  48. [48]

    Hooegerheid, Proceedings of the Particle Physics with Slow Neutrons Conference, PPNS 2018 (2019)

    S. Hooegerheid, Proceedings of the Particle Physics with Slow Neutrons Conference, PPNS 2018 (2019)

  49. [49]

    Wietfeldt, Private communication (2019)

    F. Wietfeldt, Private communication (2019)

  50. [50]

    Nagakura, K

    N. Nagakura, K. Hirota, S. Ieki, T. Ino, Y. Iwashita, 11 M. Kitaguchi, R. Kitahara, K. Mishima, A. Morishita, H. Oide, H. Otono, R. Sakakibara, Y. Seki, T. Shima, H. M. Shimizu, T. Sugino, N. Sumi, H. Sumino, K. Take- tani, G. Tanaka, T. Tomita, T. Yamada, S. Yamashita, M. Yokohashi, , and T. Yoshioka, Proc. of Sci., The 26th International Nuclear Physics...

  51. [51]

    Z. Tang, M. Blatnik, L. J. Broussard, J. H. Choi, S. M. Clayton, C. Cude-Woods, S. Currie, D. E. Fellers, E. M. Fries, P. Geltenbort, F. Gonzalez, K. P. Hickerson, T. M. Ito, C.-Y. Liu, S. W. T. MacDonald, M. Makela, C. L. Morris, C. M. O’Shaughnessy, R. W. Pattie, B. Plaster, D. J. Salvat, A. Saunders, Z. Wang, A. R. Young, and B. A. Zeck, Phys. Rev. Let...

  52. [52]

    J. R. Green, J. W. Negele, A. V. Pochinsky, S. N. Syrit- syn, M. Engelhardt, and S. Krieg, Phys. Rev. D 86, 114509 (2012)

  53. [53]

    Alexandrou, M

    C. Alexandrou, M. Constantinou, P. Dimopoulos, R. Frezzotti, K. Hadjiyiannakou, K. Jansen, C. Kallido- nis, B. Kostrzewa, G. Koutsou, M. Mangin-Brinet, A. Va- quero Avil` es-Casco, and U. Wenger, Phys. Rev. D 95, 114 (2017)

  54. [54]

    C. C. Chang, A. N. Nicholson, E. Rinaldi, E. Berkowitz, N. Garron, D. A. Brantley, H. Monge-Camacho, C. J. Monahan, C. Bouchard, M. A. Clark, B. Jo´ o, T. Kurth, K. Orginos, P. Vranas, and A. Walker-Loud, Nature558, 91 (2018)

  55. [55]

    I. S. Towner and J. C. Hardy, Phys. Rev. C 82, 065501 (2010)

  56. [56]

    Gl¨ uck, Nuclear Physics A628, 493 (1998)

    F. Gl¨ uck, Nuclear Physics A628, 493 (1998)

  57. [57]

    B. R. Holstein, Reviews of Modern Physics 46, 789 (1974)

  58. [58]

    Minamisono, T

    K. Minamisono, T. Nagatomo, K. Matsuta, C. D. P. Levy, Y. Tagishi, M. Ogura, M. Yamaguchi, H. Ota, J. A. Behr, K. P. Jackson, A. Ozawa, M. Fukuda, T. Sumikama, H. Fujiwara, T. Iwakoshi, R. Matsumiya, M. Mihara, A. Chiba, Y. Hashizume, T. Yasuno, and T. Minamisono, Phys. Rev. C 84, 055501 (2011)

  59. [59]

    F. P. Calaprice, Phys. Rev. C 12, 2016 (1975)

  60. [60]

    Navratil, Private communication (2016)

    P. Navratil, Private communication (2016)

  61. [61]

    Hergert, S

    H. Hergert, S. K. Bogner, T. D. Morris, A. Schwenk, and K. Tsukiyama, Physics Reports 621, 165 (2016)

  62. [62]

    R. J. Furnstahl, D. R. Phillips, and S. Wesolowski, Jour- nal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics42, 034028 (2015)

  63. [63]

    Wesolowski, R

    S. Wesolowski, R. J. Furnstahl, J. A. Melendez, and D. R. Phillips, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 46, 045102 (2019)

  64. [64]

    Gysbers, G

    P. Gysbers, G. Hagen, J. D. Holt, G. R. Jansen, T. D. Morris, P. Navr´ atil, T. Papenbrock, S. Quaglioni, A. Schwenk, S. R. Stroberg, and K. A. Wendt, Nature Physics 15, 428 (2019)

  65. [65]

    B. R. Barrett, P. Navr´ atil, and J. P. Vary, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 69, 131 (2013)

  66. [66]

    S. R. Stroberg, A. Calci, H. Hergert, J. D. Holt, S. K. Bogner, R. Roth, and A. Schwenk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 032502 (2017)

  67. [67]

    Vaintraub, N

    S. Vaintraub, N. Barnea, and D. Gazit, Phys. Rev. C 79, 065501 (2009)

  68. [68]

    Bacca and S

    S. Bacca and S. Pastore, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 41, 123002 (2014)

  69. [69]

    C. Ji, S. Bacca, N. Barnea, O. J. Hernandez, and N. N. Dinur, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 45, 093002 (2018)

  70. [70]

    Hagen, A

    G. Hagen, A. Ekstr¨ om, C. Forss´ en, G. R. Jansen, W. Nazarewicz, T. Papenbrock, K. A. Wendt, S. Bacca, N. Barnea, B. Carlsson, C. Drischler, K. Hebeler, M. Hjorth-Jensen, M. Miorelli, G. Orlandini, A. Schwenk, and J. Simonis, Nature Physics 12, 186 EP (2015)

  71. [71]

    P. N. D. M. E. P. Collaboration, T. Bhattacharya, V. Cirigliano, S. D. Cohen, R. Gupta, H.-W. Lin, and B. Yoon, Physical Review D 94, 054508 (2016)

  72. [72]

    Glick-Magid, Y

    A. Glick-Magid, Y. Mishnayot, I. Mukul, M. Hass, S. Vaintraub, G. Ron, and D. Gazit, Physics Letters B 767, 285 (2017)