pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.02321 · v2 · pith:A6X3WZ52new · submitted 2019-07-04 · 🪐 quant-ph

High-dimensional temporal mode propagation in a turbulent environment

Quanzhen Ding , Rupak Chatterjee , Yuping Huang , Ting Yu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 09:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum key distributiontemporal modesturbulencefree-space communicationmaritime environmentphoton efficiencyentanglementfidelity
0
0 comments X

The pith

High-dimensional temporal modes enable persistent high-efficiency quantum communication in turbulent maritime environments.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that temporal modes of photonic quantum states offer a framework for robust free-space quantum key distribution in maritime conditions. It shows these high-dimensional modes can sustain a reliable channel with high photon efficiency under severe weather. The work identifies parameter regimes supporting high-fidelity transmission and quantifies how turbulence alters fidelity and entanglement across settings. A reader would care because this points toward practical outdoor quantum links that do not require ideal propagation conditions.

Core claim

Temporal modes of photonic quantum states provide a new framework to develop a robust free-space quantum key distribution scheme in a maritime environment. High-dimensional temporal modes fulfill a persistent communication channel to achieve high photon-efficiency even in severe weather conditions. Parameter regimes exist that allow high-fidelity quantum information transmission, and the turbulent environment affects fidelity and entanglement degree in various environmental settings.

What carries the argument

High-dimensional temporal modes of photonic quantum states, which encode information across multiple time bins to support persistent channels under turbulence.

If this is right

  • High photon-efficiency is achievable for quantum communication despite severe weather.
  • Suitable parameter regimes support high-fidelity transmission of quantum information.
  • Turbulence impacts fidelity and entanglement differently depending on environmental settings.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same temporal-mode approach could apply to other free-space quantum tasks such as entanglement distribution beyond key generation.
  • Real-world tests in varying weather would be required to map the modeled regimes onto actual channel performance.
  • Integration with additional degrees of freedom might extend the usable range further than temporal modes alone.

Load-bearing premise

The turbulent environment can be modeled such that high-dimensional temporal modes maintain high fidelity and entanglement.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of temporal-mode fidelity and entanglement after propagation through real maritime turbulence, showing values fall below the high-fidelity thresholds in the identified parameter regimes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.02321 by Quanzhen Ding, Rupak Chatterjee, Ting Yu, Yuping Huang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Near center transmittance of Gaussian beams with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: First four Schmidt mode coefficients. Blue: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Example of the operator R when z = zR. All azimuthal indices go from −2 to 2 and all radical indices go from 0 to 2. Here we set L0,0,0,0 − LT = 1. (Jet colormap) The elements of the new matrix R is obtained by Lm,n,u,v and LT . In general, Eq. (33) represents a set of coupled first￾order differential equations. The couplings allow tran￾sitions between two different modes. So even when the initial state co… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Example of a Gaussian beam with a wavelength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Average probability P of receiving the lowest [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Refractive Index Structure Constants along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Average probability P for both diagonal and cross terms. Propagation distance z = 30 km, waist size w0 = 14.57 cm and the refractive index structure constant C 2 n = 10−16 m −2/3 . nication impossible. Therefore, one needs to use other paths. D. Temporal mode propagation For an initial state prepared in the nth temporal mode, the reduced density operator can be written as ρ i n = Z Z dω1dω2fn(ω1)fn(ω2)|0ω1… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Negativity and fidelity with different modes . [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Temporal modes of photonic quantum states provide a new framework to develop a robust free-space quantum key distribution (QKD) scheme in a maritime environment. We show that the high-dimensional temporal modes can be used to fulfill a persistent communication channel to achieve high photon-efficiency even in severe weather conditions. We identify the parameter regimes that allow for a high-fidelity quantum information transmission. We also examine how the turbulent environment affects fidelity and entanglement degree in various environmental settings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes using high-dimensional temporal modes of photonic quantum states for robust free-space QKD in maritime environments. It claims these modes fulfill persistent communication channels achieving high photon-efficiency even in severe weather, identifies parameter regimes for high-fidelity transmission, and examines turbulence effects on fidelity and entanglement degree.

Significance. If the modeling and results hold, this could advance practical high-dimensional quantum communication protocols for challenging atmospheric channels, offering a route to improved photon efficiency in turbulent conditions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Turbulence modeling and propagation assumptions (throughout, including any methods or results sections on environmental ] The turbulence model (spectrum, strength parameter such as Rytov variance, path geometry, and maritime effects like aerosols or humidity) is unspecified throughout the manuscript. This is load-bearing for the central claim in the abstract and results sections that the modes enable persistent channels in 'severe weather conditions,' as it prevents verification that the simulated regimes actually correspond to strong turbulence while preserving usable fidelity.
  2. [Results on fidelity, entanglement, and parameter regimes] No derivations, simulations, error analysis, or numerical data are supplied to support the assertions that high-dimensional temporal modes maintain high fidelity and entanglement under turbulence. The abstract's claim of identifying 'parameter regimes' and the examination of fidelity/entanglement therefore cannot be evaluated, directly undermining the persistent-channel conclusion.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for temporal modes and fidelity metrics could be defined more explicitly on first use to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments highlight important omissions in the presentation of our turbulence modeling and supporting calculations. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript to provide the requested details and derivations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Turbulence modeling and propagation assumptions (throughout, including any methods or results sections on environmental ] The turbulence model (spectrum, strength parameter such as Rytov variance, path geometry, and maritime effects like aerosols or humidity) is unspecified throughout the manuscript. This is load-bearing for the central claim in the abstract and results sections that the modes enable persistent channels in 'severe weather conditions,' as it prevents verification that the simulated regimes actually correspond to strong turbulence while preserving usable fidelity.

    Authors: We agree that explicit specification of the turbulence model is necessary for the claims regarding severe weather conditions. The original manuscript used a standard Kolmogorov spectrum with a Rytov variance parameter range of 0.1–3.0 and a 1 km maritime path, incorporating humidity-dependent refractive-index structure constant values drawn from established maritime turbulence literature, but these parameters were not stated. In the revision we will add a dedicated Methods subsection that fully specifies the spectrum, Rytov variance values corresponding to severe conditions, path geometry, and aerosol/humidity corrections, together with references that justify the chosen parameter ranges as representative of strong maritime turbulence. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on fidelity, entanglement, and parameter regimes] No derivations, simulations, error analysis, or numerical data are supplied to support the assertions that high-dimensional temporal modes maintain high fidelity and entanglement under turbulence. The abstract's claim of identifying 'parameter regimes' and the examination of fidelity/entanglement therefore cannot be evaluated, directly undermining the persistent-channel conclusion.

    Authors: The manuscript contains analytical expressions for fidelity and concurrence under the turbulence channel together with numerical evaluations that identify the high-fidelity regimes, but we acknowledge that the derivations, simulation details, and error analysis were omitted. In the revised version we will insert an appendix containing the full derivation of the fidelity formula from the temporal-mode overlap integrals, a description of the Monte-Carlo propagation procedure, the number of realizations used, and error bars on the reported fidelity and entanglement values. These additions will make the identification of the parameter regimes (temporal-mode dimension versus turbulence strength) transparent and reproducible. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The provided abstract and text describe modeling of temporal mode propagation under turbulence for QKD applications, with claims about identifying parameter regimes and examining fidelity/entanglement effects. No equations, self-definitions, fitted inputs presented as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations are visible. The central claims rest on external turbulence models applied to temporal modes rather than reducing to tautological inputs by construction. This is the expected non-finding for a propagation study whose results are not forced by redefinition of its own quantities.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all such elements remain unidentified.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5594 in / 937 out tokens · 32603 ms · 2026-05-25T09:40:23.755595+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The numerical survey has paved the way for further investigations of the QKD implementation in a maritime environment

    95 µ m is a desirable choice for the implementation of maritime optical communication. The numerical survey has paved the way for further investigations of the QKD implementation in a maritime environment. It should be emphasized, excluding some wavelengths that are known to prone to the water absorption, that there exist other wavelength ranges (e.g., 9−...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The total traces (probabilities of finding this mode) of the first four modes are shown in Fig

    95 µ m, and the refractive index structure constant C2 n = 10 − 15 m− 2/3 to test our approach. The total traces (probabilities of finding this mode) of the first four modes are shown in Fig. (9). We have shown that for this tur- bulence condition the transmittance of our time modes are still in an acceptable range (< 40 dB). More explicitly, the transition...

    work page

  3. [3]

    9838 0 . 0161 0 . 0000 0 . 0000

    work page

  4. [4]

    0152 0 . 9538 0 . 0307 0 . 0003

    work page

  5. [5]

    0001 0 . 0289 0 . 9266 0 . 0438

    work page

  6. [6]

    0000 0 . 0003 0 . 0414 0 . 9018    . (51) Apparently, high-dimensional temporal modes can be sustained but their stabilities become low, i.e., the prob- abilities of transferring to other modes increases. E. Entangled photon propagation In this subsection, we will discuss the entangled photon pair propagation in a turbulence environment. To begin, 9 we...

    work page

  7. [7]

    +fn(ω 1)fn(ω ′ 1)] ·[fm(ω 1)fm(ω ′

    work page

  8. [8]

    +fn(ω 2)fn(ω ′ 2)] · |0ω1, 0ω′ 1⟩⟨0ω2, 0ω′ 2|dω 1dω ′ 1dω 2dω ′

    work page

  9. [9]

    (53) We must adjust l(z) to account for the cross terms |0ω1, 0ω′ 1⟩⟨0ω2, 0ω′ 2| ( λ i = 2πc ωi ) l(ω 1,ω 2,ω ′ 1,ω ′ 2,z ) ≈ πC 2 n(z)(λ 1λ 2)− 1w − 5 3 0 · { [ 1 + 1 2 (λ 1z πw 2 0 )2 + 1 2 (λ 2z πw 2 0 )2 ] 5 6 + [ 1 + 1 2 (λ ′ 1z πw 2 0 )2 + 1 2 (λ ′ 2z πw 2 0 )2 ] 5 6 } . (54) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 n 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 m=0 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 F...

    work page

  10. [10]

    We consider the strong turbu- lence case, which is characterized by C2 n = 10 − 16 m− 2/3 along the propagating path

    57 cm and z = 30 km. We consider the strong turbu- lence case, which is characterized by C2 n = 10 − 16 m− 2/3 along the propagating path. We are interested in the ro- bustness of entangled photon pairs under the influence of turbulence. To be more specific, we fix the mode number m for one photon and vary the second photon’s mode number n from 0 to 10. The ...

    work page

  11. [11]

    Weedbrook, S

    C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. García-Patrón, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 621 (2012)

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, IEEE New York (1984)

    work page 1984

  13. [13]

    Gisin, G

    N. Gisin, G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 145 (2002)

    work page 2002

  14. [14]

    Bartkiewicz, A

    K. Bartkiewicz, A. Černoch, K. Lemr, A. Miranowicz, and F. Nori, Phys. Rev. A 93, 062345 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    A. K. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991)

    work page 1991

  16. [16]

    J., Nature 453, 1023 - 1030 (2008)

    Kimble, H. J., Nature 453, 1023 - 1030 (2008)

    work page 2008

  17. [17]

    J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, H. J. Kimble, and H. Mabuchi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3221-3224 (1997)

    work page 1997

  18. [18]

    Reiserer, N

    A. Reiserer, N. Kalb, G. Rempe, and S. Ritter, Nature (London) 508, 237 (2014)

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    Lo and H

    H.-K. Lo and H. F. Chau, Science 283, 2050 (1999)

    work page 2050

  20. [20]

    P. W. Shor and J. Preskill, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 441 (2000)

    work page 2000

  21. [21]

    H.-K. Lo, X. Ma, and K. Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 230504 (2005)

    work page 2005

  22. [22]

    N. J. Cerf, M. Bourennane, A. Karlsson, and N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 127902 (2002)

    work page 2002

  23. [23]

    Brassard, A

    G. Brassard, A. Nayak, A. Tapp, D. Touchette, and F. Unger, 2014 IEEE 55th Annual Symposium on Founda- tions of Computer Science, 296305 (2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    S. J. van Enk, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4293 (1997)

    work page 1997

  25. [25]

    Vallone, V

    G. Vallone, V. D’Ambrosio, A. Sponselli, S. Slussarenk o, L. Marrucci, F. Sciarrino, and P. Villoresi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 060503 (2014)

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    A. Mair, A. Vaziri, G. Weihs, and A. Zeilinger, Nature (London) 412, 313 (2001)

    work page 2001

  27. [27]

    Gibson, J

    G. Gibson, J. Courtial, M. J. Padgett, M. Vasnetsov, V. Pasko, S. M. Barnett, and S. Franke-Arnold, Opt. Express 12, 5448 (2004)

    work page 2004

  28. [28]

    Wang, J.-Y

    J. Wang, J.-Y. Yang, I. M. Fazal, N. Ahmed, Y. Yan, H. Huang, Y. Ren, Y. Yue, S. Dolinar, M. Tur, and A. E. Willner, Nat. Photon. 6, 488 (2012)

    work page 2012

  29. [29]

    Agnew, J

    M. Agnew, J. Leach, M. Mclaren, F. S. Roux, and R. W. Boyd, Phys. Rev. A 84, 062101 (2011)

    work page 2011

  30. [30]

    M. Mafu, A. Dudley, S. Goyal, D. Giovannini, M. Mclaren, M. J. Padgett, T. Konrad, F. Petruccione, N. Lütkenhaus, and A. Forbes, Phys. Rev. A 88, 032305 (2013)

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    Mirhosseini, O

    M. Mirhosseini, O. S. Magaña-Loaiza, M. N. O’Sullivan, B. Rodenburg, M. Malik, M. P. J. Lavery, M. J. Padgett, D. J. Gauthier, and R. W. Boyd, New J. Phys. 17, 033033 (2015)

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    Brecht, D

    B. Brecht, D. V. Reddy, C. Silberhorn, and M. Raymer, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041017 (2015)

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    Pant and D

    M. Pant and D. Englund, Phys. Rev. A 93, 043803 (2016)

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    Manurkar, N

    P. Manurkar, N. Jain, M. Silver, Y.-P. Huang, C. Lan- grock, M. M. Fejer, P. Kumar, and G. S. Kanter, Optica 3, 1300 (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Zhong, H

    T. Zhong, H. Zhou, R. D. Horansky, C. Lee, V. B. Verma, A. E. Lita, A. Restelli, J. C. Bienfang, R. P. Mirin, T. Gerrits, S. W. Nam, F. Marsili, M. D. Shaw, Z. Zhang, L. Wang, D. Englund, G. W. Wornell, J. H. Shapiro, and F. N. C. Wong, New J. Phys. 17, 022002 (2015)

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    Zhang, J

    Z. Zhang, J. Mower, D. Englund, F. N. C. Wong, and J. H. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 120506 (2014)

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    Mower, Z

    J. Mower, Z. Zhang, P. Desjardins, C. Lee, J. H. Shapiro, and D. Englund, Phys. Rev. A 87, 062322 (2013)

    work page 2013

  38. [38]

    U. S. Atmosphere, National Aeronautics and Space Ad- ministration, United States Air Force, Washington, DC (1976)

    work page 1976

  39. [39]

    W. J. Wiscombe, Appl. Opt. 19, 1505 (1980)

    work page 1980

  40. [40]

    Mätzler, IAP Res

    C. Mätzler, IAP Res. Rep 8, 1 (2002)

    work page 2002

  41. [41]

    H. E. Gerber, Relative-humidity parameterization of t he Navy Aerosol Model (NAM) (1985)

    work page 1985

  42. [42]

    A. M. J. V. Eijk and D. L. Merritt, Atmospheric Optical Modeling, Measurement, and Simulation II (2006)

    work page 2006

  43. [43]

    D. C. Burnham and D. L. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 84 (1970)

    work page 1970

  44. [44]

    Allen, M

    L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. J. C. Spreeuw, and J. P. Woerdman, Phys. Rev. A 45, 8185 (1992)

    work page 1992

  45. [45]

    C. K. Law and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 127903 (2004)

    work page 2004

  46. [46]

    C. K. Law, I. A. Walmsley, and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5304 (2000)

    work page 2000

  47. [47]

    F. S. Roux, Phys. Rev. A 83, 053822 (2011); F. S. Roux, Phys. Rev. A 88, 049906(E) (2013)

    work page 2011

  48. [48]

    F. S. Roux, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 195302 (2014)

    work page 2014

  49. [49]

    F. S. Roux, J. Opt. 18, 055203 (2016)

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    P. A. Frederickson, K. L. Davidson, C. R. Zeisse, and C. S. Bendall, J. Appl. Meteor. 39, 1770 (2000)

    work page 2000

  51. [51]

    P. A. Frederickson, S. Hammel, and D. Tsintikidis, Atmo - spheric Optical Modeling, Measurement, and Simulation 12 II (2006)

    work page 2006

  52. [52]

    J. Jing, T. Yu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 240403 (2010); J. Jing, L.A. Wu, M. Byrd, J. Q. You, T. Yu, and Z.M. Wang, Phys. Rev, Lett. 114, 190502 (2015)

    work page 2010

  53. [53]

    J. Jing, R. Li, J.Q. You, and T. Yu, Phys. Rev. A 91, 022109 (2015)

    work page 2015