pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.02994 · v2 · pith:N3BZK5O4new · submitted 2019-07-05 · 📡 eess.SP · cs.LG· eess.IV

Deep learning in ultrasound imaging

Ruud JG van Sloun , Regev Cohen , Yonina C Eldar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 01:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP cs.LGeess.IV
keywords deep learningultrasound imagingbeamformingDoppler imagingsuper-resolutionsignal recoverymachine learningreceive processing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Deep learning applied to raw radio-frequency ultrasound data enables adaptive beamforming, Doppler processing, and super-resolution imaging.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews ways to insert deep learning into ultrasound systems starting at the earliest stage of raw channel data. It focuses on networks that use sparsity patterns and large data volumes to carry out tasks normally done by fixed algorithms. A sympathetic reader would care because these changes could improve image quality and add new functions while keeping the same hardware front end. The authors describe concrete cases such as learned beamformers, compressive color Doppler, and fast approximations to iterative recovery for clutter removal. If the approaches work, deep learning would become part of the standard receive pipeline rather than an add-on after images are formed.

Core claim

Deep learning strategies applied at the interface of signal acquisition and machine learning, exploiting both data structure and data dimensionality already at the raw radio-frequency channel stage, provide efficient solutions for adaptive beamforming, adaptive spectral Doppler through artificial agents, learnable compressive encodings for color Doppler, and structured signal recovery by learning fast approximations of iterative minimization problems, with applications to clutter suppression and super-resolution ultrasound.

What carries the argument

Learned fast approximations to iterative minimization problems and artificial agents that operate directly on raw radio-frequency channel data.

If this is right

  • Artificial agents trained on channel data perform adaptive beamforming and spectral Doppler estimation.
  • Compressive encodings learned from data reduce the data rate needed for color Doppler imaging.
  • Fast learned approximations replace slow iterative solvers for structured signal recovery in clutter suppression.
  • Super-resolution ultrasound imaging becomes practical through the same learned recovery framework.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same learned approximations could cut the computational cost of real-time ultrasound processing on portable devices.
  • Reduced sampling rates at the channel stage might become feasible while preserving image quality.
  • The approach suggests a template for applying similar end-to-end learning in other array-based imaging systems.

Load-bearing premise

Deep learning solutions can be effectively applied at the raw radio-frequency channel stage by exploiting data structure and dimensionality for beamforming, Doppler, clutter suppression, and super-resolution tasks.

What would settle it

Head-to-head tests on identical raw ultrasound datasets showing that the deep learning beamformers or recovery methods produce lower contrast or resolution scores than conventional delay-and-sum or iterative baselines across multiple probes and tissue types.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.02994 by Regev Cohen, Ruud JG van Sloun, Yonina C Eldar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of the ultrasound imaging chain, along with the deep learning solutions discussed in this paper. Note that, today, analog processing at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Flow charts of standard delay-and-sum beamforming using fixed apodization weights, and (b) adaptive beamforming by deep learning [49], along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Adaptive spectral Doppler processing using deep learning, displaying (a) an illustrative overview of the method, comprising an artificial agent that [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: These advantages come at the cost of a higher compu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Tissue Doppler processing using a deep encoder-decoder network for an illustrative intra-cardiac ultrasound application [62], displaying the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) ISTA diagram for solving RPCA and (b) a diagram of a single layer of CORONA [81]. (c) Qualitative assessment of clutter removal performed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Fast ultrasound localization microscopy through deep learning (deep-ULM) [95], [96], using a convolutional neural network to map low-resolution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Deep encoder-decoder architecture used in Deep-ULM [95], [96], (b) Deep unfolded ULM architecture obtained by unfolding the ISTA scheme, as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We consider deep learning strategies in ultrasound systems, from the front-end to advanced applications. Our goal is to provide the reader with a broad understanding of the possible impact of deep learning methodologies on many aspects of ultrasound imaging. In particular, we discuss methods that lie at the interface of signal acquisition and machine learning, exploiting both data structure (e.g. sparsity in some domain) and data dimensionality (big data) already at the raw radio-frequency channel stage. As some examples, we outline efficient and effective deep learning solutions for adaptive beamforming and adaptive spectral Doppler through artificial agents, learn compressive encodings for color Doppler, and provide a framework for structured signal recovery by learning fast approximations of iterative minimization problems, with applications to clutter suppression and super-resolution ultrasound. These emerging technologies may have considerable impact on ultrasound imaging, showing promise across key components in the receive processing chain.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a survey reviewing deep learning strategies in ultrasound imaging systems, from front-end signal acquisition to advanced applications. It aims to give readers a broad understanding of DL's possible impact by discussing methods at the signal acquisition-ML interface that exploit data structure (e.g., sparsity) and dimensionality (big data) at the raw radio-frequency channel stage. Specific examples outlined include DL solutions for adaptive beamforming and spectral Doppler via artificial agents, compressive encodings for color Doppler, and learning fast approximations to iterative minimization for structured signal recovery applied to clutter suppression and super-resolution ultrasound. The central claim is that these technologies may have considerable impact on ultrasound imaging across key receive processing chain components.

Significance. If the surveyed approaches hold, the paper offers a useful high-level map of DL applications in ultrasound that could guide researchers toward exploiting raw RF data structure for tasks like beamforming and super-resolution. As a survey it does not advance new quantitative results or proofs, but its cautious framing of 'promise' and 'possible impact' provides a starting point for the field without overclaiming.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'artificial agents' for adaptive beamforming and Doppler is introduced without a brief definition or pointer to the specific prior work being summarized; adding one sentence of clarification would improve accessibility for readers outside the subfield.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the methods 'exploit both data structure (e.g. sparsity in some domain) and data dimensionality (big data) already at the raw radio-frequency channel stage' is repeated in the examples but never illustrated with even a high-level block diagram or reference to a representative equation from the cited literature; a single illustrative figure or equation reference would strengthen the survey's utility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary of our survey manuscript and the recommendation of minor revision. The assessment correctly identifies the scope as a high-level review of deep learning at the signal acquisition-ML interface in ultrasound, without new quantitative claims.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; survey of prior work with no derivations

full rationale

This is a survey paper that reviews existing deep learning approaches in ultrasound imaging and outlines their potential applications at the raw RF stage. It advances no new quantitative derivations, equations, predictions, or theorems. Claims use cautious language about 'promise' and 'possible impact' without introducing load-bearing steps that reduce to fitted inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes. The argument rests on summarizing prior literature rather than deriving results from within the paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the authors.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5676 in / 890 out tokens · 19531 ms · 2026-05-25T01:52:32.108921+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 124 canonical work pages · 8 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Diagnostic ultrasound imaging: inside out

    Thomas L Szabo. Diagnostic ultrasound imaging: inside out . Aca- demic Press, 2004

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    Design of low-cost portable ultrasound systems

    Jonathan M Baran and John G Webster. Design of low-cost portable ultrasound systems. In Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society , pages 792–795. IEEE, 2009

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    Fourier-domain beamforming: the path to compressed ultrasound imaging

    Tanya Chernyakova and Yonina C Eldar. Fourier-domain beamforming: the path to compressed ultrasound imaging. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control , 61(8):1252–1267, 2014

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    3D ultrafast ultrasound imaging in vivo

    Jean Provost, Clement Papadacci, Juan Esteban Arango, Marion Im- bault, Mathias Fink, Jean-Luc Gennisson, Mickael Tanter, and Mathieu Pernot. 3D ultrafast ultrasound imaging in vivo. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 59(19):L1, 2014

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Ultrafast imaging in biomedical ultrasound

    Mickael Tanter and Mathias Fink. Ultrafast imaging in biomedical ultrasound. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 61(1):102–119, 2014

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping

    J ´er´emy Bercoff, Mickael Tanter, and Mathias Fink. Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 51(4):396–409, 2004

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    Spatiotemporal clutter filtering of ultrafast ultrasound data highly increases doppler and fultrasound sensitivity

    Charlie Demen ´e, Thomas Deffieux, Mathieu Pernot, Bruno-F ´elix Os- manski, Val´erie Biran, Jean-Luc Gennisson, Lim-Anna Sieu, Antoine Bergel, Stephanie Franqui, Jean-Michel Correas, et al. Spatiotemporal clutter filtering of ultrafast ultrasound data highly increases doppler and fultrasound sensitivity. IEEE transactions on medical imaging , 34(11):2271–2...

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Ultrafast ultrasound localization microscopy for deep super-resolution vascular imaging

    Claudia Errico, Juliette Pierre, Sophie Pezet, Yann Desailly, Zsolt Lenkei, Olivier Couture, and Mickael Tanter. Ultrafast ultrasound localization microscopy for deep super-resolution vascular imaging. Nature, 527(7579):499, 2015

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    Compressive multiplexing of ultrasound signals

    Adrien Besson, Dimitris Perdios, Marcel Arditi, Yves Wiaux, and Jean- Philippe Thiran. Compressive multiplexing of ultrasound signals. In IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) , pages 1–4. IEEE, 2018

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Sampling theory: Beyond bandlimited systems

    Yonina C Eldar. Sampling theory: Beyond bandlimited systems . Cambridge University Press, 2015

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    Multichannel sampling of pulse streams at the rate of innovation

    Kfir Gedalyahu, Ronen Tur, and Yonina C Eldar. Multichannel sampling of pulse streams at the rate of innovation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , 59(4):1491–1504, 2011

    work page 2011

  12. [12]

    Innovation rate sampling of pulse streams with application to ultrasound imaging

    Ronen Tur, Yonina C Eldar, and Zvi Friedman. Innovation rate sampling of pulse streams with application to ultrasound imaging. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , 59(4):1827–1842, 2011. 16

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    Compressed sensing: theory and applications

    Yonina C Eldar and Gitta Kutyniok. Compressed sensing: theory and applications. Cambridge University Press, 2012

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    Xampling in ultrasound imaging

    Noam Wagner, Yonina C Eldar, Arie Feuer, Gilad Danin, and Zvi Friedman. Xampling in ultrasound imaging. In Medical Imaging 2011: Ultrasonic Imaging, Tomography, and Therapy , volume 7968, page 796818. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2011

    work page 2011

  15. [15]

    Compressed beamforming in ultrasound imaging

    Noam Wagner, Yonina C Eldar, and Zvi Friedman. Compressed beamforming in ultrasound imaging. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 60(9):4643–4657, 2012

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    Xampling: Signal acquisition and processing in union of subspaces

    Moshe Mishali, Yonina C Eldar, and Asaf J Elron. Xampling: Signal acquisition and processing in union of subspaces. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , 59(10):4719–4734, 2011

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    Xampling: Analog to digital at sub-Nyquist rates

    Moshe Mishali, Yonina C Eldar, Oleg Dounaevsky, and Eli Shoshan. Xampling: Analog to digital at sub-Nyquist rates. IET circuits, devices & systems, 5(1):8–20, 2011

    work page 2011

  18. [18]

    Xampling at the rate of innovation

    Tomer Michaeli and Yonina C Eldar. Xampling at the rate of innovation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 60(3):1121–1133, 2012

    work page 2012

  19. [19]

    Fourier- domain beamforming and structure-based reconstruction for plane- wave imaging

    Tanya Chernyakova, Regev Cohen, Rotem Mulayoff, Yael Sde-Chen, Christophe Fraschini, Jeremy Bercoff, and Yonina C Eldar. Fourier- domain beamforming and structure-based reconstruction for plane- wave imaging. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 65(10):1810–1821, 2018

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    Sub-nyquist sampling and fourier domain beamforming in volumetric ultrasound imaging

    Amir Burshtein, Michael Birk, Tanya Chernyakova, Alon Eilam, Ar- cady Kempinski, and Yonina C Eldar. Sub-nyquist sampling and fourier domain beamforming in volumetric ultrasound imaging. IEEE transac- tions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control , 63(5):703– 716, 2016

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Focus: Fourier-based coded ultrasound

    Almog Lahav, Tanya Chernyakova, and Yonina C Eldar. Focus: Fourier-based coded ultrasound. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control , 64(12):1828–1839, 2017

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    An axial velocity estimator for ultrasound blood flow imaging, based on a full evaluation of the doppler equation by means of a two-dimensional autocorrela- tion approach

    Thanasis Loupas, JT Powers, and Robert W Gill. An axial velocity estimator for ultrasound blood flow imaging, based on a full evaluation of the doppler equation by means of a two-dimensional autocorrela- tion approach. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 42(4):672–688, 1995

    work page 1995

  23. [23]

    The use of fast fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms

    Peter Welch. The use of fast fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Transactions on audio and electroacoustics , 15(2):70–73, 1967

    work page 1967

  24. [24]

    Acoustic radiation force impulse (arfi) imaging: a review

    Kathy Nightingale. Acoustic radiation force impulse (arfi) imaging: a review. Current medical imaging reviews , 7(4):328–339, 2011

    work page 2011

  25. [25]

    Viscoelasticity mapping by identification of local shear wave dynamics

    Ruud JG van Sloun, Rogier R Wildeboer, Hessel Wijkstra, and Mas- simo Mischi. Viscoelasticity mapping by identification of local shear wave dynamics. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 64(11):1666–1673, 2017

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Ultrasound con- trast agents: a review

    Barry B Goldberg, Ji-Bin Liu, and Flemming Forsberg. Ultrasound con- trast agents: a review. Ultrasound in medicine & biology , 20(4):319– 333, 1994

    work page 1994

  27. [27]

    Ultrasound- contrast-agent dispersion and velocity imaging for prostate cancer localization

    Ruud JG van Sloun, Libertario Demi, Arnoud W Postema, Jean JMCH de la Rosette, Hessel Wijkstra, and Massimo Mischi. Ultrasound- contrast-agent dispersion and velocity imaging for prostate cancer localization. Medical image analysis , 35:610–619, 2017

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Nonlinear acoustics , volume 237

    Mark F Hamilton, David T Blackstock, et al. Nonlinear acoustics , volume 237. Academic press San Diego, 1998

    work page 1998

  29. [29]

    Contrast enhanced ultrasound by real-time spatiotemporal filtering of ultrafast images

    Yann Desailly, Anne-Marie Tissier, Jean-Michel Correas, Fr ´ed´eric Wintzenrieth, Micka¨el Tanter, and Olivier Couture. Contrast enhanced ultrasound by real-time spatiotemporal filtering of ultrafast images. Physics in Medicine & Biology , 62(1):31, 2016

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    Acoustic super-resolution with ultrasound and mi- crobubbles

    OM Viessmann, RJ Eckersley, Kirsten Christensen-Jeffries, MX Tang, and C Dunsby. Acoustic super-resolution with ultrasound and mi- crobubbles. Physics in Medicine & Biology , 58(18):6447, 2013

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    A super-resolution ultrasound method for brain vascular mapping

    Meaghan A OReilly and Kullervo Hynynen. A super-resolution ultrasound method for brain vascular mapping. Medical physics , 40(11), 2013

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    Fast vascular ultrasound imaging with en- hanced spatial resolution and background rejection

    Avinoam Bar-Zion, Charles Tremblay-Darveau, Oren Solomon, Dan Adam, and Yonina C Eldar. Fast vascular ultrasound imaging with en- hanced spatial resolution and background rejection. IEEE transactions on medical imaging , 36(1):169–180, 2017

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Sushi: Sparsity-based ultrasound super- resolution hemodynamic imaging

    Avinoam Bar-Zion, Oren Solomon, Charles Tremblay-Darveau, Dan Adam, and Yonina C Eldar. Sushi: Sparsity-based ultrasound super- resolution hemodynamic imaging. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control , 65(12):2365–2380, 2018

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators

    Kurt Hornik, Maxwell Stinchcombe, and Halbert White. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural networks , 2(5):359–366, 1989

    work page 1989

  35. [35]

    Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning

    V olodymyr Mnih, Koray Kavukcuoglu, David Silver, Andrei A Rusu, Joel Veness, Marc G Bellemare, Alex Graves, Martin Riedmiller, Andreas K Fidjeland, Georg Ostrovski, et al. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 518(7540):529, 2015

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    Deep learning

    Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville. Deep learning. MIT press, 2016

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    Sound speed fluctuations in medical ultrasound imaging comparison between different correction algo- rithms

    Raoul Mallart and Mathias Fink. Sound speed fluctuations in medical ultrasound imaging comparison between different correction algo- rithms. In Acoustical Imaging, pages 213–218. Springer, 1992

    work page 1992

  38. [38]

    Optimum array processing: Part IV of detection, estimation, and modulation theory

    Harry L Van Trees. Optimum array processing: Part IV of detection, estimation, and modulation theory . John Wiley & Sons, 2004

    work page 2004

  39. [39]

    Learning beamforming in ultrasound imaging

    Sanketh Vedula, Ortal Senouf, Grigoriy Zurakhov, Alex Bronstein, Oleg Michailovich, and Michael Zibulevsky. Learning beamforming in ultrasound imaging. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.08043 , 2018

    work page arXiv 2018

  40. [40]

    A deep learning approach to ultrasound image recovery

    Dimitris Perdios, Adrien Besson, Marcel Arditi, and Jean-Philippe Thiran. A deep learning approach to ultrasound image recovery. In IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) , pages 1–4. Ieee, 2017

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    End-to-End Learning-Based Ultrasound Reconstruction

    Walter Simson, R ¨udiger G ¨obl, Magdalini Paschali, Markus Kr ¨onke, Klemens Scheidhauer, Wolfgang Weber, and Nassir Navab. End- to-end learning-based ultrasound reconstruction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.04696, 2019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1904

  42. [42]

    Universal Deep Beamformer for Variable Rate Ultrasound Imaging

    Shujaat Khan, Jaeyoung Huh, and Jong Chul Ye. Universal deep beamformer for variable rate ultrasound imaging. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.01706, 2019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1901

  43. [43]

    Deep neural networks for ultrasound beamforming

    Adam C Luchies and Brett C Byram. Deep neural networks for ultrasound beamforming. IEEE transactions on medical imaging , 37(9):2010–2021, 2018

    work page 2010

  44. [44]

    Beamforming and speckle reduction using neural networks

    Dongwoon Hyun, Leandra L Brickson, Kevin T Looby, and Jeremy J Dahl. Beamforming and speckle reduction using neural networks. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2019

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Nonlocal means-based speckle filtering for ultrasound images

    Pierrick Coup ´e, Pierre Hellier, Charles Kervrann, and Christian Bar- illot. Nonlocal means-based speckle filtering for ultrasound images. IEEE transactions on image processing , 18(10):2221–2229, 2009

    work page 2009

  46. [46]

    High frame-rate cardiac ultrasound imaging with deep learn- ing

    Ortal Senouf, Sanketh Vedula, Grigoriy Zurakhov, Alex Bronstein, Michael Zibulevsky, Oleg Michailovich, Dan Adam, and David Blond- heim. High frame-rate cardiac ultrasound imaging with deep learn- ing. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pages 126–134. Springer, 2018

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    Goudarzi, A

    S. Goudarzi, A. Asif, and Rivaz H. Multi-focus ultrasound imaging us- ing generative adversarial networks. In IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) , 2019

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    A generative adversarial neural network for beamforming ultra- sound images: Invited presentation

    Arun Asokan Nair, Trac D Tran, Austin Reiter, and Muyinatu A Lediju Bell. A generative adversarial neural network for beamforming ultra- sound images: Invited presentation. In 2019 53rd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS) , pages 1–6. IEEE, 2019

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    Deep learning for fast adaptive beamforming

    Ben Luijten, Regev Cohen, Frederik J de Bruijn, Harold AW Schmeitz, Massimo Mischi, Yonina C Eldar, and Ruud JG van Sloun. Deep learning for fast adaptive beamforming. In ICASSP 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 1333–1337. IEEE, 2019

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    Convex optimization

    Stephen Boyd and Lieven Vandenberghe. Convex optimization. Cam- bridge university press, 2004

    work page 2004

  51. [51]

    Understanding and improving convolutional neural networks via con- catenated rectified linear units

    Wenling Shang, Kihyuk Sohn, Diogo Almeida, and Honglak Lee. Understanding and improving convolutional neural networks via con- catenated rectified linear units. In international conference on machine learning, pages 2217–2225, 2016

    work page 2016

  52. [52]

    Adaptive spectral doppler estimation

    Fredrik Gran, Andreas Jakobsson, and Jorgen Arendt Jensen. Adaptive spectral doppler estimation. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferro- electrics, and frequency control , 56(4):700–714, 2009

    work page 2009

  53. [53]

    Estimation of blood velocities using ultrasound: a signal processing approach

    Jørgen Arendt Jensen. Estimation of blood velocities using ultrasound: a signal processing approach . Cambridge University Press, 1996

    work page 1996

  54. [54]

    Periodically gapped data spectral velocity esti- mation in medical ultrasound using spatial and temporal dimensions

    Paul Liu and Dong Liu. Periodically gapped data spectral velocity esti- mation in medical ultrasound using spatial and temporal dimensions. In 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pages 437–440. IEEE, 2009

    work page 2009

  55. [55]

    Sparse convolutional beamforming for ultrasound imaging

    Regev Cohen and Yonina C Eldar. Sparse convolutional beamforming for ultrasound imaging. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferro- electrics, and frequency control , 65(12):2390–2406, 2018

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    Front-end electronics for cable reduction in intracardiac echocardiography (ice) catheters

    M Wasequr Rashid, Thomas Carpenter, Coskun Tekes, Amirabbas Pirouz, Gwangrok Jung, David Cowell, Steven Freear, Maysam Gho- vanloo, and F Levent Degertekin. Front-end electronics for cable reduction in intracardiac echocardiography (ice) catheters. In IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) , pages 1–4. IEEE, 2016

    work page 2016

  57. [57]

    In vivo real-time 3-d 17 intracardiac echo using pmut arrays

    David E Dausch, Kristin H Gilchrist, James B Carlson, Stephen D Hall, John B Castellucci, and Olaf T von Ramm. In vivo real-time 3-d 17 intracardiac echo using pmut arrays. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control , 61(10):1754–1764, 2014

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    Towards sub-nyquist tissue doppler imaging using non-uniformly spaced stream of pulses

    Avinoam Bar-Zion, Dan Adam, Martino Alessandrini, Jan D’hooge, and Yonina C Eldar. Towards sub-nyquist tissue doppler imaging using non-uniformly spaced stream of pulses. In IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) , pages 1–4. IEEE, 2015

    work page 2015

  59. [59]

    4-d ice: A 2-d array transducer with integrated asic in a 10-fr catheter for real-time 3- d intracardiac echocardiography

    Douglas Wildes, Warren Lee, Bruno Haider, Scott Cogan, Krishnaku- mar Sundaresan, David M Mills, Christopher Yetter, Patrick H Hart, Christopher R Haun, Mikael Concepcion, et al. 4-d ice: A 2-d array transducer with integrated asic in a 10-fr catheter for real-time 3- d intracardiac echocardiography. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and f...

    work page 2016

  60. [60]

    Dual stage beamforming in the absence of front-end receive focusing

    Deep Bera, Johan G Bosch, Martin D Verweij, Nico de Jong, and Hendrik J V os. Dual stage beamforming in the absence of front-end receive focusing. Physics in Medicine & Biology , 62(16):6631, 2017

    work page 2017

  61. [61]

    Distributed deep neural networks over the cloud, the edge and end devices

    Surat Teerapittayanon, Bradley McDanel, and HT Kung. Distributed deep neural networks over the cloud, the edge and end devices. In 2017 IEEE 37th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), pages 328–339. IEEE, 2017

    work page 2017

  62. [62]

    Learning doppler with deep neural networks and its application to intra- cardiac echography

    Ruud JG Van Sloun, Harm Belt, Kees Janse, and Massimo Mischi. Learning doppler with deep neural networks and its application to intra- cardiac echography. In IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), pages 1–4. IEEE, 2018

    work page 2018

  63. [63]

    Contrast-enhanced ultrasound

    Bryant Furlow. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Radiologic technology, 80(6):547S–561S, 2009

    work page 2009

  64. [64]

    Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (dce-us) with quantification of tumor perfusion: a new diagnostic tool to evaluate the early effects of antiangiogenic treatment

    Nathalie Lassau, Linda Chami, Baya Benatsou, Pierre Peronneau, and Alain Roche. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (dce-us) with quantification of tumor perfusion: a new diagnostic tool to evaluate the early effects of antiangiogenic treatment. European Radiology Supplements, 17(6):89–98, 2007

    work page 2007

  65. [65]

    Dy- namic contrast enhanced ultrasound for therapy monitoring

    John M Hudson, Ross Williams, Charles Tremblay-Darveau, Paul S Sheeran, Laurent Milot, Georg A Bjarnason, and Peter N Burns. Dy- namic contrast enhanced ultrasound for therapy monitoring. European journal of radiology , 84(9):1650–1657, 2015

    work page 2015

  66. [66]

    Motion model ultrasound localization microscopy for preclinical and clinical multiparametric tumor characterization

    Tatjana Opacic, Stefanie Dencks, Benjamin Theek, Marion Piepen- brock, Dimitri Ackermann, Anne Rix, Twan Lammers, Elmar Stickeler, Stefan Delorme, Georg Schmitz, et al. Motion model ultrasound localization microscopy for preclinical and clinical multiparametric tumor characterization. Nature communications, 9(1):1527, 2018

    work page 2018

  67. [67]

    Principles and recent developments in ultrasound contrast agents

    N De Jong, FJ Ten Cate, CT Lancee, JRTC Roelandt, and N Bom. Principles and recent developments in ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasonics, 29(4):324–330, 1991

    work page 1991

  68. [68]

    Clutter filter design for ultrasound color flow imaging

    Steinar Bjaerum, Hans Torp, and Kjell Kristoffersen. Clutter filter design for ultrasound color flow imaging. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control , 49(2):204–216, 2002

    work page 2002

  69. [69]

    An improved wall filter for flow imaging of low velocity flow

    Lewis Thomas and Anne Hall. An improved wall filter for flow imaging of low velocity flow. In Ultrasonics Symposium, 1994. Proceedings., 1994 IEEE, volume 3, pages 1701–1704. IEEE, 1994

    work page 1994

  70. [70]

    Ultrasound contrast imaging: current and new potential methods

    Peter JA Frinking, Ayache Bouakaz, Johan Kirkhorn, Folkert J Ten Cate, and Nico De Jong. Ultrasound contrast imaging: current and new potential methods. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology , 26(6):965–975, 2000

    work page 2000

  71. [71]

    Eigen-based clutter filter design for ultrasound color flow imaging: a review

    Alfred CH Yu and Lasse Lovstakken. Eigen-based clutter filter design for ultrasound color flow imaging: a review. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control , 2010

    work page 2010

  72. [72]

    Complex principal components for robust motion estimation

    F William Mauldin, Francesco Viola, and William F Walker. Complex principal components for robust motion estimation. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control , 57(11), 2010

    work page 2010

  73. [73]

    The singular value filter: a general filter design strategy for pca-based signal separation in medical ultrasound imaging

    F William Mauldin, Dan Lin, and John A Hossack. The singular value filter: a general filter design strategy for pca-based signal separation in medical ultrasound imaging. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging , 30(11):1951–1964, 2011

    work page 1951

  74. [74]

    BSS-based filtering of physiological and arfi-induced tissue and blood motion

    Caterina M Gallippi, Kathryn R Nightingale, and Gregg E Trahey. BSS-based filtering of physiological and arfi-induced tissue and blood motion. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology , 29(11):1583–1592, 2003

    work page 2003

  75. [75]

    Real-time adaptive clutter rejection filtering in color flow imaging using power method iterations

    Lasse Lovstakken, Steinar Bjaerum, Kjell Kristoffersen, Rune Haaver- stad, and Hans Torp. Real-time adaptive clutter rejection filtering in color flow imaging using power method iterations. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control , 53(9):1597– 1608, 2006

    work page 2006

  76. [76]

    A new high resolution color flow system using an eigendecomposition-based adaptive filter for clutter rejection

    Dustin E Kruse and Katherine W Ferrara. A new high resolution color flow system using an eigendecomposition-based adaptive filter for clutter rejection. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 49(10):1384–1399, 2002

    work page 2002

  77. [77]

    Ultrafast ultrasound localization microscopy for deep super-resolution vascular imaging

    Claudia Errico, Juliette Pierre, Sophie Pezet, Yann Desailly, Zsolt Lenkei, Olivier Couture, and Mickael Tanter. Ultrafast ultrasound localization microscopy for deep super-resolution vascular imaging. Nature, 527(7579):499–502, 2015

    work page 2015

  78. [78]

    Ultrasound small vessel imaging with block-wise adaptive local clutter filtering.IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 36(1):251–262, 2017

    Pengfei Song, Armando Manduca, Joshua D Trzasko, and Shigao Chen. Ultrasound small vessel imaging with block-wise adaptive local clutter filtering.IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 36(1):251–262, 2017

    work page 2017

  79. [79]

    Receiver-operating characteristic analysis of eigen-based clutter filters for ultrasound color flow imag- ing

    Adrian JY Chee and CH Alfred. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis of eigen-based clutter filters for ultrasound color flow imag- ing. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 65(3):390–399, 2018

    work page 2018

  80. [80]

    Multidimensional clutter filter optimization for ultrasonic perfusion imaging

    MinWoo Kim, Yang Zhu, Jamila Hedhli, Lawrence W Dobrucki, and Michael F Insana. Multidimensional clutter filter optimization for ultrasonic perfusion imaging. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control , 65(11):2020–2029, 2018

    work page 2020

Showing first 80 references.