pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.03075 · v1 · pith:36GR7LJ6new · submitted 2019-07-06 · 💻 cs.CV · eess.IV

AMD Severity Prediction And Explainability Using Image Registration And Deep Embedded Clustering

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 01:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV eess.IV
keywords AMDOCTimage registrationdeep embedded clusteringseverity predictionexplainabilitydeep learningretinal imaging
0
0 comments X

The pith

Deep learning registration and clustering predicts AMD severity from OCT images without a standard clinical scale.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes using image registration and deep embedded clustering to predict the severity of age-related macular degeneration from optical coherence tomography scans. It shows that this approach achieves classification performance comparable to existing state-of-the-art methods while also performing well on new data. Registration outputs are claimed to provide clearer explanations for the predictions than standard class activation maps. This matters because AMD lacks a uniform severity scale, so the method offers a data-driven way to assess and explain disease progression.

Core claim

By combining deep learning based image registration with deep embedded clustering, the method identifies diseased cases and predicts their severity levels in AMD OCT images, matching state-of-the-art classification accuracy and offering improved explainability through registration outputs compared to class activation maps.

What carries the argument

Deep embedded clustering applied to registered OCT images to group cases by inferred severity levels.

If this is right

  • Classification performance matches state of the art methods.
  • Predicted severity performs well on previously unseen data.
  • Registration output provides better explainability than class activation maps for label and severity decisions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Such methods could enable consistent severity tracking across different clinics despite varying clinical practices.
  • Future work might test if these clusters align with actual patient outcomes like vision loss rates.
  • Integration with longitudinal data could allow prediction of disease progression rates.

Load-bearing premise

That the clusters identified by deep embedded clustering correspond to meaningful differences in AMD severity even without a standard clinical scale.

What would settle it

A comparison showing that the predicted severity levels do not align with expert clinical assessments or patient outcomes on an independent test set.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.03075 by Dwarikanath Mahapatra.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Architecture of our proposed network for AMD classification and severity es￾timation. A regression network for image registration and deep embedded clustering network are combined to achieve our objectives. Thus the following mapping between image labels and cluster labels are obtained Normal ∈ {1, 2, 3}, DME ∈ {4, 5, 6, 7}, and AMD ∈ {8, 9, 10}. 2.5 Predicting Severity of test image When a test image come… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: third column shows examples of normal images that were rightly classified by Reg − DEC but incorrectly classified as AMD by DenseNet. The green regions highlight disease activty as identified by DenseNet, which is er￾roneous since there are no abnormalities here. Reg − DEC does not show any localization of pathologies in these examples. The fourth column shows examples of DME that were rightly identified b… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a method to predict severity of age related macular degeneration (AMD) from input optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. Although there is no standard clinical severity scale for AMD, we leverage deep learning (DL) based image registration and clustering methods to identify diseased cases and predict their severity. Experiments demonstrate our approach's disease classification performance matches state of the art methods. The predicted disease severity performs well on previously unseen data. Registration output provides better explainability than class activation maps regarding label and severity decisions

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes using deep learning-based image registration combined with deep embedded clustering on OCT images to identify AMD cases and predict their severity levels, in the absence of a standard clinical scale. It claims that the disease classification performance matches state-of-the-art methods, that the severity predictions generalize well to unseen data, and that registration outputs provide superior explainability over class activation maps for both labels and severity decisions.

Significance. If the clusters derived from deep embedded clustering can be shown to align with clinically meaningful AMD severity distinctions and the registration-based explanations hold under external validation, the approach could enable quantitative severity assessment and improved interpretability in a domain lacking standardized scales. The reported matching of SOTA classification performance and generalization would be a useful contribution if substantiated with full experimental details.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'the predicted disease severity performs well on previously unseen data' and matches SOTA classification performance is unsupported because the abstract (and available description) supplies no dataset details, metrics, baselines, validation procedures, or cross-validation scheme, preventing any assessment of whether the data actually supports the claims.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract/Methods (clustering pipeline): the assertion that clusters meaningfully encode AMD severity levels lacks an external clinical validation anchor (e.g., correlation to expert grades, visual acuity, or lesion counts). Since the paper notes there is no standard clinical severity scale, deriving severity labels directly from the fitted clusters creates a circularity risk that undermines the generalization and explainability claims.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'registration output' for explainability but does not specify the registration algorithm, loss terms, or how alignment outputs are mapped to severity decisions versus CAMs.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

Thank you for reviewing our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'the predicted disease severity performs well on previously unseen data' and matches SOTA classification performance is unsupported because the abstract (and available description) supplies no dataset details, metrics, baselines, validation procedures, or cross-validation scheme, preventing any assessment of whether the data actually supports the claims.

    Authors: The abstract provides a high-level overview and is constrained by word limits. The full manuscript details the OCT dataset used, the performance metrics (such as accuracy and AUC), the state-of-the-art baselines compared against, and the validation procedures including the cross-validation scheme in the Experiments section. These support the claims made. We will revise the abstract to include brief mention of key results and dataset size to address this concern. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract/Methods (clustering pipeline): the assertion that clusters meaningfully encode AMD severity levels lacks an external clinical validation anchor (e.g., correlation to expert grades, visual acuity, or lesion counts). Since the paper notes there is no standard clinical severity scale, deriving severity labels directly from the fitted clusters creates a circularity risk that undermines the generalization and explainability claims.

    Authors: We note that the lack of a standard clinical severity scale for AMD is stated in the paper and is the reason for adopting an unsupervised clustering approach to derive severity levels from the data. The clusters are obtained via deep embedded clustering on registered images, and we show that the severity predictions generalize to unseen data while the registration provides visual explanations. This avoids circularity because no pre-existing severity labels are used; the method discovers structure in the data. External validation with clinical anchors is a valuable direction for future work but is outside the scope of the current technical contribution focused on the registration and clustering pipeline. revision: no

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Severity labels and predictions both derive from the same deep embedded clustering step

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract]
    "Although there is no standard clinical severity scale for AMD, we leverage deep learning (DL) based image registration and clustering methods to identify diseased cases and predict their severity. ... The predicted disease severity performs well on previously unseen data."

    Severity is introduced solely via the clustering output (no external scale exists), yet the same clustering procedure is then presented as producing independent 'predictions' whose quality is evaluated on held-out data. The performance metric therefore measures how well the clustering reproduces its own assignments rather than matching any external clinical quantity.

full rationale

The paper explicitly notes the absence of any external clinical severity scale and instead uses deep embedded clustering both to define severity categories and to generate the 'predictions' on unseen data. This makes the reported performance an internal consistency check on the clustering itself rather than an independent validation against clinical ground truth. No equations or self-citations are needed to see the reduction; the abstract states the construction directly.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no details on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; ledger left empty.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5600 in / 1040 out tokens · 23260 ms · 2026-05-25T01:44:21.695301+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    https://www.eyepacs.com

  2. [2]

    ”the insight segmentation and registration toolkit” www.itk.org

  3. [3]

    In: Proc

    Balakrishnan, G., Zhao, A., Sabuncu, M., Guttag, J.: An supervised learning model for deformable medical image registration. In: Proc. CVPR. pp. 9252–9260 (2018)

  4. [4]

    Computer Vision and Image Understanding 184, 57–65 (2019)

    Bozorgtabar, B., Mahapatra, D., von Teng, H., Pollinger, A., Ebner, L., Thiran, J.P., M.Reyes.: Informative sample generation using class aware generative ad- versarial networks for classification of chest xrays. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 184, 57–65 (2019)

  5. [5]

    Mahapatra, B.B., Garnavi, R.: Image super-resolution using progressive gen- erative adversarial networks for medical image analysis

    D. Mahapatra, B.B., Garnavi, R.: Image super-resolution using progressive gen- erative adversarial networks for medical image analysis. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 71(1), 30–39 (2019)

  6. [6]

    al.: Flownet: Learning optical flow with convolu- tional networks

    Dosovitskiy, A., Fischer, P., et. al.: Flownet: Learning optical flow with convolu- tional networks. In: In Proc. IEEE ICCV. pp. 2758–2766 (2015)

  7. [7]

    In: In Proc

    Graziani, M., Andrearczyk, V., Mller, H.: Regression concept vectors for bidirec- tional explanations in histopathology. In: In Proc. MICCAI-iMIMIC. pp. 124–132 (2018)

  8. [8]

    In: In Proc

    He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: In Proc. CVPR (2016)

  9. [9]

    Densely Connected Convolutional Networks

    Huang, G., Liu, Z., van der Maaten, L., Weinberger, K.: Densely connected con- volutional networks. In: https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.06993, (2016)

  10. [10]

    In: In Proc: ACM Intl

    Kuang, H., Guthier, B., Saini, M., Mahapatra, D., Saddik, A.E.: A real-time smart assistant for video surveillance through handheld devices. In: In Proc: ACM Intl. Conf. Multimedia. pp. 917–920 (2014)

  11. [11]

    IEEE Trans

    Li, Z., Mahapatra, D., J.Tielbeek, Stoker, J., van Vliet, L., Vos, F.: Image registra- tion based on autocorrelation of local structure. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 35(1), 63–75 (2016)

  12. [12]

    In: In Proc: MICCAI workshop on Image Analysis of Human Brain Devel- opment (IAHBD) (2011)

    Mahapatra, D.: Neonatal brain mri skull stripping using graph cuts and shape priors. In: In Proc: MICCAI workshop on Image Analysis of Human Brain Devel- opment (IAHBD) (2011)

  13. [13]

    In: Proc

    Mahapatra, D.: Cardiac lv and rv segmentation using mutual context information. In: Proc. MICCAI-MLMI. pp. 201–209 (2012)

  14. [14]

    In: In Proc: SPIE Medical Imaging (2012) 9

    Mahapatra, D.: Groupwise registration of dynamic cardiac perfusion images using temporal information and segmentation information. In: In Proc: SPIE Medical Imaging (2012) 9

  15. [15]

    In: Proc

    Mahapatra, D.: Landmark detection in cardiac mri using learned local image statis- tics. In: Proc. MICCAI-Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. Imaging and Modelling Challenges (STACOM). pp. 115–124 (2012)

  16. [16]

    Mahapatra, D.: Skull stripping of neonatal brain mri: Using prior shape information with graphcuts. J. Digit. Imaging 25(6), 802–814 (2012)

  17. [17]

    Mahapatra, D.: Cardiac image segmentation from cine cardiac mri using graph cuts and shape priors. J. Digit. Imaging 26(4), 721–730 (2013)

  18. [18]

    Mahapatra, D.: Cardiac mri segmentation using mutual context information from left and right ventricle. J. Digit. Imaging 26(5), 898–908 (2013)

  19. [19]

    In: Proc

    Mahapatra, D.: Graph cut based automatic prostate segmentation using learned semantic information. In: Proc. IEEE ISBI. pp. 1304–1307 (2013)

  20. [20]

    Mahapatra, D.: Joint segmentation and groupwise registration of cardiac perfusion images using temporal information. J. Digit. Imaging 26(2), 173–182 (2013)

  21. [21]

    Mahapatra, D.: Automatic cardiac segmentation using semantic information from random forests. J. Digit. Imaging. 27(6), 794–804 (2014)

  22. [22]

    Computer Vision and Image Understanding 151(1), 114–123 (2016)

    Mahapatra, D.: Combining multiple expert annotations using semi-supervised learning and graph cuts for medical image segmentation. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 151(1), 114–123 (2016)

  23. [23]

    Pattern Recognition 63(1), 700–709 (2017)

    Mahapatra, D.: Semi-supervised learning and graph cuts for consensus based med- ical image segmentation. Pattern Recognition 63(1), 700–709 (2017)

  24. [24]

    In: In Proc

    Mahapatra, D., Bozorgtabar, S., Hewavitahranage, S., Garnavi, R.: Image super resolution using generative adversarial networks and local saliencymaps for retinal image analysis,. In: In Proc. MICCAI. pp. 382–390 (2017)

  25. [25]

    In: In Proc

    Mahapatra, D., Bozorgtabar, S., Thiran, J.P., Reyes, M.: Efficient active learning for image classification and segmentation using a sample selection and conditional generative adversarial network. In: In Proc. MICCAI (2). pp. 580–588 (2018)

  26. [26]

    In: In Proc

    Mahapatra, D., Buhmann, J.: Obtaining consensus annotations for retinal image segmentation using random forest and graph cuts. In: In Proc. OMIA. pp. 41–48 (2015)

  27. [27]

    In: In Proc

    Mahapatra, D., Buhmann, J.: Visual saliency based active learning for prostate mri segmentation. In: In Proc. MLMI. pp. 9–16 (2015)

  28. [28]

    SPIE Journal of Medical Imaging 3(1) (2016)

    Mahapatra, D., Buhmann, J.: Visual saliency based active learning for prostate mri segmentation. SPIE Journal of Medical Imaging 3(1) (2016)

  29. [29]

    In: Proc

    Mahapatra, D., Buhmann, J.: Automatic cardiac rv segmentation using semantic information with graph cuts. In: Proc. IEEE ISBI. pp. 1094–1097 (2013)

  30. [30]

    IEEE Trans

    Mahapatra, D., Buhmann, J.: Analyzing training information from random forests for improved image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Imag. Proc. 23(4), 1504–1512 (2014)

  31. [31]

    IEEE Trans

    Mahapatra, D., Buhmann, J.: Prostate mri segmentation using learned semantic knowledge and graph cuts. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engg. 61(3), 756–764 (2014)

  32. [32]

    In: In Proc

    Mahapatra, D., Buhmann, J.: A field of experts model for optic cup and disc segmentation from retinal fundus images. In: In Proc. IEEE ISBI. pp. 218–221 (2015)

  33. [33]

    In: In Proc

    Mahapatra, D., Ge, Z.: Training data independent image registration with gans using transfer learning and segmentation information. In: In Proc. IEEE ISBI (2019)

  34. [34]

    In: In Proc

    Mahapatra, D., Ge, Z., Sedai, S., Chakravorty., R.: Joint registration and segmen- tation of xray images using generative adversarial networks. In: In Proc. MICCAI- MLMI. pp. 73–80 (2018) 10

  35. [35]

    IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing

    Mahapatra, D., Gilani, S., Saini., M.: Coherency based spatio-temporal saliency detection for video object segmentation. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing. 8(3), 454–462 (2014)

  36. [36]

    IEEE Trans

    Mahapatra, D., J.Tielbeek, Makanyanga, J., Stoker, J., Taylor, S., Vos, F., Buh- mann, J.: Automatic detection and segmentation of crohn’s disease tissues from abdominal mri. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 32(12), 1232–1248 (2013)

  37. [37]

    In: Proc

    Mahapatra, D., J.Tielbeek, Makanyanga, J., Stoker, J., Taylor, S., Vos, F., Buh- mann, J.: Active learning based segmentation of crohn’s disease using principles of visual saliency. In: Proc. IEEE ISBI. pp. 226–229 (2014)

  38. [38]

    In: In Proc: MICCAI-ABD (2014)

    Mahapatra, D., J.Tielbeek, Makanyanga, J., Stoker, J., Taylor, S., Vos, F., Buh- mann, J.: Combiningmultiple expert annotations using semi-supervised learning and graph cuts for crohns disease segmentation. In: In Proc: MICCAI-ABD (2014)

  39. [39]

    Mahapatra, D., J.Tielbeek, Vos, F., Buhmann, J.: A supervised learning approach for crohn’s disease detection using higher order image statistics and a novel shape asymmetry measure. J. Digit. Imaging 26(5), 920–931 (2013)

  40. [40]

    In: In Proc

    Mahapatra, D., Li, Z., Vos, F., Buhmann, J.: Joint segmentation and groupwise registration of cardiac dce mri using sparse data representations. In: In Proc. IEEE ISBI. pp. 1312–1315 (2015)

  41. [41]

    In: IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT)

    Mahapatra, D., Routray, A., Mishra, C.: An active snake model for classification of extreme emotions. In: IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT). pp. 2195–2199 (2006)

  42. [42]

    In: In Proc

    Mahapatra, D., Roy, P., Sedai, S., Garnavi, R.: A cnn based neurobiology inspired approach for retinal image quality assessment. In: In Proc. EMBC. pp. 1304–1307 (2016)

  43. [43]

    In: In Proc

    Mahapatra, D., Roy, P., Sedai, S., Garnavi, R.: Retinal image quality classification using saliency maps and cnns. In: In Proc. MICCAI-MLMI. pp. 172–179 (2016)

  44. [44]

    In: In 13th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering (2008)

    Mahapatra, D., Roy, S., Sun, Y.: Retrieval of mr kidney images by incorporating spatial information in histogram of low level features. In: In 13th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering (2008)

  45. [45]

    In: IEEE ICME

    Mahapatra, D., Saini, M., Sun, Y.: Illumination invariant tracking in office envi- ronments using neurobiology-saliency based particle filter. In: IEEE ICME. pp. 953–956 (2008)

  46. [46]

    In: Proc

    Mahapatra, D., Sch¨uffler, P., Tielbeek, J., Vos, F., Buhmann, J.: Semi-supervised and active learning for automatic segmentation of crohn’s disease. In: Proc. MIC- CAI, Part 2. pp. 214–221 (2013)

  47. [47]

    In: Proc

    Mahapatra, D., Sun, Y.: Nonrigid registration of dynamic renal MR images using a saliency based MRF model. In: Proc. MICCAI. pp. 771–779 (2008)

  48. [48]

    In: Proc

    Mahapatra, D., Sun, Y.: Registration of dynamic renal MR images using neurobi- ological model of saliency. In: Proc. ISBI. pp. 1119–1122 (2008)

  49. [49]

    In: In 13th International Conference on Biomedical Engi- neering (2008)

    Mahapatra, D., Sun, Y.: Using saliency features for graphcut segmentation of per- fusion kidney images. In: In 13th International Conference on Biomedical Engi- neering (2008)

  50. [50]

    In: Proc

    Mahapatra, D., Sun, Y.: Joint registration and segmentation of dynamic cardiac perfusion images using mrfs. In: Proc. MICCAI. pp. 493–501 (2010)

  51. [51]

    In: Proc

    Mahapatra, D., Sun., Y.: An mrf framework for joint registration and segmentation of natural and perfusion images. In: Proc. IEEE ICIP. pp. 1709–1712 (2010)

  52. [52]

    In: Proc

    Mahapatra, D., Sun, Y.: Retrieval of perfusion images using cosegmentation and shape context information. In: Proc. APSIPA Annual Summit and Conference (ASC) (2010) 11

  53. [53]

    EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

    Mahapatra, D., Sun, Y.: Rigid registration of renal perfusion images using a neu- robiology based visual saliency model. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing. pp. 1–16 (2010)

  54. [54]

    In: Proc

    Mahapatra, D., Sun, Y.: A saliency based mrf method for the joint registration and segmentation of dynamic renal mr images. In: Proc. ICDIP (2010)

  55. [55]

    IEEE Trans

    Mahapatra, D., Sun, Y.: Mrf based intensity invariant elastic registration of cardiac perfusion images using saliency information. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engg. 58(4), 991–1000 (2011)

  56. [56]

    In: In Proc: MICCAI

    Mahapatra, D., Sun, Y.: Orientation histograms as shape priors for left ventricle segmentation using graph cuts. In: In Proc: MICCAI. pp. 420–427 (2011)

  57. [57]

    IEEE Trans

    Mahapatra, D., Sun, Y.: Integrating segmentation information for improved mrf- based elastic image registration. IEEE Trans. Imag. Proc. 21(1), 170–183 (2012)

  58. [58]

    In: Proc

    Mahapatra, D., Tielbeek, J., Buhmann, J., Vos, F.: A supervised learning based ap- proach to detect crohn’s disease in abdominal mr volumes. In: Proc. MICCAI work- shop Computational and Clinical Applications in Abdominal Imaging(MICCAI- ABD). pp. 97–106 (2012)

  59. [59]

    In: Proc

    Mahapatra, D., Tielbeek, J., Vos, F., ., J.B.: Crohn’s disease tissue segmentation from abdominal mri using semantic information and graph cuts. In: Proc. IEEE ISBI. pp. 358–361 (2013)

  60. [60]

    In: Proc

    Mahapatra, D., Tielbeek, J., Vos, F., Buhmann, J.: Localizing and segmenting crohn’s disease affected regions in abdominal mri using novel context features. In: Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging (2013)

  61. [61]

    In: Proc

    Mahapatra, D., Tielbeek, J., Vos, F., Buhmann, J.: Weakly supervised semantic segmentation of crohn’s disease tissues from abdominal mri. In: Proc. IEEE ISBI. pp. 832–835 (2013)

  62. [62]

    In: In Proc

    Mahapatra, D., Vos, F., Buhmann, J.: Crohn’s disease segmentation from mri using learned image priors. In: In Proc. IEEE ISBI. pp. 625–628 (2015)

  63. [63]

    Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 128(1), 75–85 (2016)

    Mahapatra, D., Vos, F., Buhmann, J.: Active learning based segmentation of crohns disease from abdominal mri. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 128(1), 75–85 (2016)

  64. [64]

    In: SPIE HVEI

    Mahapatra, D., Winkler, S., Yen, S.: Motion saliency outweighs other low-level features while watching videos. In: SPIE HVEI. pp. 1–10 (2008)

  65. [65]

    In: In Proc

    Pereira, S., Meier, R., Alves, V., Reyes, M., Silva., C.: Automatic brain tumor grading from mri data using convolutional neural networks and quality assessment. In: In Proc. MICCAI-iMIMIC. pp. 106–114 (2018)

  66. [66]

    IEEE Trans

    Rasti, R., Rabbani, H., Mehri, A., Hajizadeh, F.: Macular oct classification using a multi-scale convolutional neural network ensemble. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 37(4), 1024–1034 (2018)

  67. [67]

    Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition

    Simonyan, K., Zisserman., A.: Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. CoRR abs/1409.1556 (2014)

  68. [68]

    In: MIC- CAI

    Sokooti, H., de Vos, B., Berendsen, F., Lelieveldt, B., Isgum, I., Staring, M.: Non- rigid image registration using multiscale 3d convolutional neural networks. In: MIC- CAI. pp. 232–239 (2017)

  69. [69]

    Journal of Mach

    Vincent, P., Larochelle, H., Lajoie, I., Bengio, Y., Manzagol, P.: Stacked denois- ing autoencoders: Learning useful representations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion. Journal of Mach. Learn. Res. 11, 3371–3408 (2010)

  70. [70]

    End-to-End Unsupervised Deformable Image Registration with a Convolutional Neural Network

    de Vos, B., Berendsen, F., Viergever, M., Staring, M., Isgum, I.: End-to-end un- supervised deformable image registration with a convolutional neural network. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.06065 (2017) 12

  71. [71]

    IEEE EMBC

    Vos, F.M., Tielbeek, J., Naziroglu, R., Li, Z., Sch¨uffler, P., Mahapatra, D., Wiebel, A., Lavini, C., Buhmann, J., Hege, H., Stoker, J., van Vliet, L.: Computational modeling for assessment of IBD: to be or not to be? In: Proc. IEEE EMBC. pp. 3974–3977 (2012)

  72. [72]

    In: Proc

    Xie, J., Girshick, R., Farhadi, A.: Unsupervised deep embedding for clustering analysis. In: Proc. ICML. pp. 478–487 (2016)

  73. [73]

    In: Proc

    Zhou, B., Khosla, A., Lapedriza, A., Oliva, A., Torralba, A.: Learning deep features for discriminative localization. In: Proc. CVPR. pp. 2921–2929 (2016)

  74. [74]

    In: In Proc

    Zilly, J., Buhmann, J., Mahapatra, D.: Boosting convolutional filters with entropy sampling for optic cup and disc image segmentation from fundus images. In: In Proc. MLMI. pp. 136–143 (2015)

  75. [75]

    In Press Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 55(1), 28–41 (2017)

    Zilly, J., Buhmann, J., Mahapatra, D.: Glaucoma detection using entropy sampling and ensemble learning for automatic optic cup and disc segmentation. In Press Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 55(1), 28–41 (2017)