pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.04546 · v1 · pith:QRMNQER7new · submitted 2019-07-10 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph · cond-mat.mes-hall

Integrated on chip platform with quantum emitters in layered materials

Sejeong Kim , Ngoc My Hanh Duong , Minh Nguyen , Tsung-Ju Lu , Mehran Kianinia , Noah Mendelson , Alexander Solntsev , Carlo Bradac
show 2 more authors
Dirk R. Englund Igor Aharonovich
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 23:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords quantum emittershexagonal boron nitridealuminium nitride waveguideintegrated quantum photonicssingle photon transmissionroom temperature couplinglayered materials
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride couple to on-chip aluminium nitride waveguides at room temperature.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that quantum emitters embedded in layered hexagonal boron nitride can be integrated with an on-chip aluminium nitride waveguide at room temperature. It reports a coupling efficiency of 1.2% and the transmission of single photons through the waveguide. This approach contrasts with prior work on three-dimensional crystals such as diamond or gallium arsenide. The results establish a basis for combining layered materials with on-chip photonic elements to build integrated quantum photonic circuits.

Core claim

Room temperature coupling of quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride to an on-chip aluminium nitride waveguide is demonstrated, achieving 1.2% light coupling efficiency and enabling transmission of single photons through the waveguide.

What carries the argument

The integration platform consisting of hexagonal boron nitride emitters coupled to an aluminium nitride waveguide, which facilitates the transfer of quantum light on chip.

If this is right

  • Provides a foundation for integrating layered materials with on-chip components.
  • Advances the realization of integrated quantum photonic circuitry.
  • Allows single photon transmission at room temperature in a chip-scale device.
  • Extends quantum emitter applications beyond three-dimensional crystal systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Layered materials may offer advantages in scalability for quantum photonic devices over bulk crystals.
  • Improving the coupling efficiency could enable more practical applications in quantum information processing.
  • Similar integration techniques might apply to other two-dimensional materials with quantum emitters.

Load-bearing premise

The measured light and single-photon statistics originate from the hBN quantum emitters specifically coupled into the AlN waveguide rather than from background or uncoupled sources.

What would settle it

Observation that no single-photon signal is detected at the waveguide output or that the coupling efficiency calculation includes significant non-emitter contributions would falsify the demonstration.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.04546 by Alexander Solntsev, Carlo Bradac, Dirk R. Englund, Igor Aharonovich, Mehran Kianinia, Minh Nguyen, Ngoc My Hanh Duong, Noah Mendelson, Sejeong Kim, Tsung-Ju Lu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: a) Schematic view of the hybrid quantum photonic system showing a hBN flake (purple) positioned onto an AlN ridge waveguide (grey). The inset shows the layered van der Waals crystal. b) Atomic force microscopy (AFM) image of the hBN-waveguide structure. The position of the hBN emitter onto the waveguide is indicated (yellow arrow). c) AFM height measurement of the hBN emitter on the waveguide along the pro… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: a) Three-dimensional FDTD simulation showing the cross section (x-z plane) of the sample, where the emission from the dipole emitter couples to the waveguide. b) Mode profile of the waveguide at 623 nm. c) Three-dimensional schematic describing the angle of the hBN emitter (red arrow) with respect to the waveguide (the longitudinal axis of the waveguide is along the x-direction). d) Coupling efficiency of … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Reversed excitation scheme of the system. a) Confocal map with excitation fixed on the grating coupler (spot B) and collection acquired from the emitter (spot A). Scale bar is 5 µm. b) PL spectrum and g (2)(τ) function (inset) are collected from the emitter (spot B). The collection spectral window is indicated by the unshaded area in (b). The g (2)(τ) curves are corrected for background and the time jitter… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Integrated quantum photonic circuitry is an emerging topic that requires efficient coupling of quantum light sources to waveguides and optical resonators. So far, great effort has been devoted to engineering on-chip systems from three-dimensional crystals such as diamond or gallium arsenide. In this study, we demonstrate room temperature coupling of quantum emitters embedded within a layered hexagonal boron nitride to an on-chip aluminium nitride waveguide. We achieved 1.2% light coupling efficiency of the device and realise transmission of single photons through the waveguide. Our results serve as a foundation for the integration of layered materials with on-chip components and for the realisation of integrated quantum photonic circuitry.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental demonstration of room-temperature coupling between quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) and an on-chip aluminum nitride (AlN) waveguide. The central claims are a device coupling efficiency of 1.2% and transmission of single photons through the waveguide, presented as a foundation for integrated quantum photonic circuits using layered materials instead of 3D crystals.

Significance. If the measured efficiency and single-photon statistics hold after accounting for setup collection factors and background, the result supplies a concrete integration example that leverages the transferability of 2D hBN flakes onto AlN waveguides. This is a standard but useful applied-physics step; the paper does not claim parameter-free theory or machine-checked proofs, but the experimental platform itself is reproducible in principle once fabrication and measurement protocols are fully specified.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §3] The abstract states a 1.2% coupling efficiency without specifying whether this value is normalized to the collection efficiency of the objective or includes waveguide propagation losses; the main text (likely § Results or Methods) should provide the exact formula and raw count rates used.
  2. [Figure 3 or equivalent] Figure captions and the single-photon verification section should explicitly state the integration time, background subtraction procedure, and g^(2)(0) value with uncertainty to allow direct assessment of the weakest assumption regarding emitter origin and single-photon character.
  3. [Discussion] The manuscript would benefit from a brief comparison table or paragraph contrasting the achieved efficiency with prior hBN or diamond waveguide coupling reports to clarify the incremental advance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review of our manuscript on the integration of hBN quantum emitters with on-chip AlN waveguides. We appreciate the positive assessment of the experimental demonstration and the recommendation for minor revision. Since no specific major comments were raised, we note that we will incorporate any minor suggestions from the editor or additional feedback in the revised version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in experimental demonstration

full rationale

The paper is a pure experimental report demonstrating room-temperature coupling of hBN quantum emitters to an on-chip AlN waveguide, with measured 1.2% efficiency and single-photon transmission. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or theoretical claims exist that could reduce any result to its inputs by construction. Central claims rest on direct device measurements rather than any self-referential modeling or self-citation chain. This is the expected outcome for an applied-physics integration paper whose strength is data quality, not a derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on experimental observation of light coupling and transmission rather than new theoretical constructs, free parameters, or invented entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Observed emission originates from single quantum emitters in hBN and is coupled to the waveguide
    This assumption underpins the claims of single-photon transmission and coupling efficiency.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5667 in / 1135 out tokens · 27124 ms · 2026-05-24T23:35:02.576025+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    W.; Gong, Q.; Acín, A.; Rottwitt, K.; Oxenløwe, L

    Wang, J.; Paesani, S.; Ding, Y.; Santagati, R.; Skrzypczyk, P.; Salavrakos, A.; Tura, J.; Augusiak, R.; Mančinska, L.; Bacco, D.; Bonneau, D.; Silverstone, J. W.; Gong, Q.; Acín, A.; Rottwitt, K.; Oxenløwe, L. K.; O’Brien, J. L.; Laing, A.; Thompson, M. G., 2018, 360 (6386), 285-291

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Wehner, S.; Elkouss, D.; Hanson, R., Science 2018, 362 (6412)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Flamini, F.; Spagnolo, N.; Sciarrino, F., Reports on Progress in Physics 2018, 82 (1), 016001

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Y.; Boltasseva, A.; Shalaev, V

    Bogdanov, S.; Shalaginov, M. Y.; Boltasseva, A.; Shalaev, V. M., Optical Materials Express 2017, 7 (1), 111-132

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    C.; Solomon, G

    Kim, H.; Bose, R.; Shen, T. C.; Solomon, G. S.; Waks, E., Nat. Photonics 2013, 7, 373

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Barik, S.; Karasahin, A.; Flower, C.; Cai, T.; Miyake, H.; DeGottardi, W.; Hafezi, M.; Waks, E., 2018, 359 (6376), 666-668

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    W.; Liu, J.; Srinivasan, K., Optica 2019, 6 (5), 563-569

    Singh, A.; Li, Q.; Liu, S.; Yu, Y.; Lu, X.; Schneider, C.; Höfling, S.; Lawall, J.; Verma, V.; Mirin, R.; Nam, S. W.; Liu, J.; Srinivasan, K., Optica 2019, 6 (5), 563-569

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Hausmann, B. J. M.; Shields, B.; Quan, Q. M.; Maletinsky, P.; McCutcheon, M.; Choy, J. T.; Babinec, T. M.; Kubanek, A.; Yacoby, A.; Lukin, M. D.; Loncar, M., Nano Lett. 2012, 12 (3), 1578-1582

    work page 2012

  9. [9]

    E.; Bhaskar, M

    Evans, R. E.; Bhaskar, M. K.; Sukachev, D. D.; Nguyen, C. T.; Sipahigil, A.; Burek, M. J.; Machielse, B.; Zhang, G. H.; Zibrov, A. S.; Bielejec, E.; Park, H.; Lončar, M.; Lukin, M. D., Science 2018, 362 (6415), 662-665

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    2017, 17 (8), 4941-4945

    Türschmann, P.; Rotenberg, N.; Renger, J.; Harder, I.; Lohse, O.; Utikal, T.; Götzinger, S.; Sandoghdar, V., Nano Lett. 2017, 17 (8), 4941-4945

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Benson, O., Nature 2011, 480 (7376), 193-199

    work page 2011

  12. [12]

    M.; Gol'tsman, G.; Korneev, A.; Rockstuhl, C.; Krupke, R.; Pernice, W

    Khasminskaya, S.; Pyatkov, F.; Słowik, K.; Ferrari, S.; Kahl, O.; Kovalyuk, V.; Rath, P.; Vetter, A.; Hennrich, F.; Kappes, M. M.; Gol'tsman, G.; Korneev, A.; Rockstuhl, C.; Krupke, R.; Pernice, W. H. P., Nat. Photonics 2016, 10, 727

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    V.; Verma, V.; Mirin, R.; Nam, S

    Davanco, M.; Liu, J.; Sapienza, L.; Zhang, C.-Z.; De Miranda Cardoso, J. V.; Verma, V.; Mirin, R.; Nam, S. W.; Liu, L.; Srinivasan, K., Nat. Commun. 2017, 8 (1), 889

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    W.; Zadeh, I

    Elshaari, A. W.; Zadeh, I. E.; Fognini, A.; Reimer, M. E.; Dalacu, D.; Poole, P. J.; Zwiller, V.; Jöns, K. D., Nat. Commun. 2017, 8 (1), 379

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Kim, J.-H.; Aghaeimeibodi, S.; Richardson, C. J. K.; Leavitt, R. P.; Englund, D.; Waks, E., Nano Lett. 2017, 17 (12), 7394-7400

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Photonics 2016, 10 (10), 631-641

    Aharonovich, I.; Englund, D.; Toth, M., Nat. Photonics 2016, 10 (10), 631-641

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Toth, M.; Aharonovich, I., Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 2019, 70 (1), null

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    V.; Castellanos-Gomez, A., Chemical Society Reviews 2018, 47 (1), 53-68

    Frisenda, R.; Navarro-Moratalla, E.; Gant, P.; Pérez De Lara, D.; Jarillo-Herrero, P.; Gorbachev, R. V.; Castellanos-Gomez, A., Chemical Society Reviews 2018, 47 (1), 53-68

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    I.; Bakhtinov, A

    Tonndorf, P.; Del Pozo-Zamudio, O.; Gruhler, N.; Kern, J.; Schmidt, R.; Dmitriev, A. I.; Bakhtinov, A. P.; Tartakovskii, A. I.; Pernice, W.; Michaelis de Vasconcellos, S.; Bratschitsch, R., Nano Lett. 2017, 17 (9), 5446-5451

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    T.; Bray, K.; Ford, M

    Tran, T. T.; Bray, K.; Ford, M. J.; Toth, M.; Aharonovich, I., Nature Nanotech. 2016, 11, 37-41. 12

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Q.; Tran, T

    Mendelson, N.; Xu, Z. Q.; Tran, T. T.; Kianinia, M.; Scott, J.; Bradac, C.; Aharonovich, I.; Toth, M., ACS Nano 2019, 13 (3), 3132-3140

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    L.; Hopper, D

    Exarhos, A. L.; Hopper, D. A.; Grote, R. R.; Alkauskas, A.; Bassett, L. C., ACS Nano 2017, 11 (3), 3328-3336

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    R.; Calderon, B.; Ji, Y.; Spencer, M

    Jungwirth, N. R.; Calderon, B.; Ji, Y.; Spencer, M. G.; Flatt, M. E.; Fuchs, G. D., Nano Lett. 2016, 16 (10), 6052-6057

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    V.; Shotan, Z.; Jayakumar, H.; Reddy, P.; Dollar, M.; Alkauskas, A.; Doherty, M

    Proscia, N. V.; Shotan, Z.; Jayakumar, H.; Reddy, P.; Dollar, M.; Alkauskas, A.; Doherty, M. W.; Meriles, C. A.; Menon, V. M., Optica 2018, 5, 1128

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    W.; Takashima, H.; Tran, T

    Schell, A. W.; Takashima, H.; Tran, T. T.; Aharonovich, I.; Takeuchi, S., ACS Photonics 2017, 4 (4), 761-767

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Express 2017, 25 (2), 587-594

    Liu, X.; Sun, C.; Xiong, B.; Wang, L.; Wang, J.; Han, Y.; Hao, Z.; Li, H.; Luo, Y.; Yan, J.; Wei, T.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J., Opt. Express 2017, 25 (2), 587-594

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    Express 2018, 26 (9), 11147-11160

    Lu, T.-J.; Fanto, M.; Choi, H.; Thomas, P.; Steidle, J.; Mouradian, S.; Kong, W.; Zhu, D.; Moon, H.; Berggren, K.; Kim, J.; Soltani, M.; Preble, S.; Englund, D., Opt. Express 2018, 26 (9), 11147-11160

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    R., Sejeong KIM, and Yeonghoon Jin; Yu, K.; Rah, Y.; Kim, S.; jin, Y., Opt

    Kyoungsik Yu, Y. R., Sejeong KIM, and Yeonghoon Jin; Yu, K.; Rah, Y.; Kim, S.; jin, Y., Opt. Lett. 2019

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Lee, S.-Y.; Jeong, T.-Y.; Jung, S.; Yee, K.-J., 2019, 256 (6), 1800417

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    Y.; Jin, W.; Vucković, J.; Rodriguez, A

    Molesky, S.; Lin, Z.; Piggott, A. Y.; Jin, W.; Vucković, J.; Rodriguez, A. W., Nat. Photonics 2018, 12 (11), 659-670

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    E.; Kuhn, T.; Bratschitsch, R., Adv

    Kern, J.; Niehues, I.; Tonndorf, P.; Schmidt, R.; Wigger, D.; Schneider, R.; Stiehm, T.; Michaelis de Vasconcellos, S.; Reiter, D. E.; Kuhn, T.; Bratschitsch, R., Adv. Mater. 2016, 28 (33), 7101-7105

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    D.; Ardelean, J

    Luo, Y.; Shepard, G. D.; Ardelean, J. V.; Rhodes, D. A.; Kim, B.; Barmak, K.; Hone, J. C.; Strauf, S., Nature Nanotech. 2018

    work page 2018