pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.05714 · v1 · pith:T22BV7EHnew · submitted 2019-07-11 · 🌀 gr-qc

Propagation of Polar Gravitational Waves in f(R,T) Scenario

M. Sharif , Aisha Siddiqa This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 23:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords f(R,T) gravitypolar gravitational wavesRegge-Wheeler perturbationsFRW universeradiation eradark energymodified gravity
0
0 comments X

The pith

In the R+2λT model of f(R,T) gravity, polar gravitational waves perturb matter distribution and velocity in the radiation era much as they do in general relativity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how polar gravitational waves propagate through a flat FRW universe filled with perfect fluid under the f(R,T) = R + 2λT gravity model. Using Regge-Wheeler perturbations, the authors derive and solve the field equations for metric, matter, and velocity perturbations in both radiation and dark energy dominated eras. They find that these waves induce changes in background matter and velocities during the radiation phase that match general relativity, while the model parameter λ affects the wave amplitude. This suggests the modified gravity theory reproduces standard wave behavior in early universe conditions for this type of perturbation.

Core claim

By perturbing the spatially flat FRW metric with Regge-Wheeler polar modes in the R+2λT model and simultaneously solving the resulting field equations, the polar gravitational waves are shown to produce alterations in the background matter distribution and velocity components during the radiation era that are identical to those in general relativity, with the parameter λ modulating the amplitude of the waves.

What carries the argument

Regge-Wheeler perturbations applied to the metric, matter density, and velocity in the f(R,T)=R+2λT modified gravity model within a flat FRW spacetime.

If this is right

  • The f(R,T) model yields gravitational wave propagation effects indistinguishable from general relativity in the radiation-dominated phase for polar modes.
  • The amplitude of polar gravitational waves depends explicitly on the model parameter λ.
  • Similar perturbation analysis applies to the dark energy dominated phase, allowing comparison across cosmic epochs.
  • Changes in matter distribution induced by the waves follow the same patterns as in standard cosmology.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This similarity might indicate that f(R,T) gravity does not introduce detectable deviations in gravitational wave signals from the early universe at linear perturbation level.
  • Extending the analysis to other wave polarizations or non-flat universes could reveal differences not seen here.
  • The dependence on λ suggests potential constraints from future gravitational wave observations on the value of the model parameter.

Load-bearing premise

The Regge-Wheeler perturbation scheme remains valid for this f(R,T) model and the perturbed field equations can be solved simultaneously for all introduced parameters in the radiation and dark energy phases.

What would settle it

A direct calculation or numerical solution showing that the induced changes in matter density or velocity from polar waves differ between the R+2λT model and general relativity in the radiation era would falsify the claimed similarity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.05714 by Aisha Siddiqa, M. Sharif.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Plots of χ versus r and η for A1 = −1, c3 = 0.01, c4 = 0.01, c5 = 0.01, c6 = 0.01, λ = 0 (brown), λ = 3(1 + √ 5)π (yellow) and λ = 3(1 + √ 5)π (pink). 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper investigates the propagation of polar gravitational waves in the spatially flat FRW universe consisting of a perfect fluid in the scenario of $R+2\lambda T$ model of $f(R,T)$ gravity ($\lambda$ being the model parameter). The spatially flat universe model is perturbed via Regge-Wheeler perturbations inducing polar gravitational waves and the field equations are formulated for both unperturbed as well as perturbed spacetimes. We solve these field equations simultaneously for the perturbation parameters introduced in the metric, matter, and velocity in the radiation, as well as dark energy, dominated phases. It is found that the polar gravitational waves can produce changes in the background matter distribution as well as velocity components in the radiation era similar to general relativity case. Moreover, we have discussed the impact of model parameter on the amplitude of gravitational waves.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the propagation of polar gravitational waves in a spatially flat FRW universe with a perfect fluid in the f(R,T) = R + 2λT model. It employs Regge-Wheeler perturbations to induce polar gravitational waves, formulates the field equations for unperturbed and perturbed spacetimes, and solves them simultaneously for perturbation parameters in the metric, matter, and velocity during radiation and dark energy dominated phases. The findings indicate that these waves induce changes in background matter distribution and velocity components in the radiation era similar to general relativity, and examines the impact of the model parameter λ on the amplitude of the gravitational waves.

Significance. If the derivations and simultaneous solutions hold, the work extends gravitational wave propagation studies to f(R,T) gravity and quantifies the role of the free parameter λ in modulating amplitudes and inducing matter/velocity perturbations. This could aid in distinguishing modified gravity effects in cosmology, though the reported similarity to GR limits the novelty unless the λ dependence yields testable deviations. The simultaneous treatment of metric, density, and velocity perturbations is a methodological strength if the equations are consistently derived.

major comments (1)
  1. [Derivation of perturbed field equations (radiation-era case)] The central claim that solutions in the radiation era are similar to GR (and that the field equations can be solved simultaneously for metric, density, and velocity perturbations) requires explicit verification that the additional source terms arising from the non-conservation of T_μν (proportional to λ) are either absent or negligible at linear order. In the radiation era the background T=0, yet perturbations source δT ≠0; the manuscript must demonstrate how the modified continuity and Euler equations are handled under the Regge-Wheeler ansatz, as this step is load-bearing for the similarity result.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract would be clearer if it briefly indicated the explicit form of the perturbation solutions obtained (e.g., whether they are analytic expressions or numerical).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the constructive comment. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Derivation of perturbed field equations (radiation-era case)] The central claim that solutions in the radiation era are similar to GR (and that the field equations can be solved simultaneously for metric, density, and velocity perturbations) requires explicit verification that the additional source terms arising from the non-conservation of T_μν (proportional to λ) are either absent or negligible at linear order. In the radiation era the background T=0, yet perturbations source δT ≠0; the manuscript must demonstrate how the modified continuity and Euler equations are handled under the Regge-Wheeler ansatz, as this step is load-bearing for the similarity result.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this key aspect of the derivation. The perturbed field equations are obtained directly from the f(R,T) = R + 2λT action and are solved simultaneously for the metric, density, and velocity perturbations. With background T = 0 in the radiation era the background equations reduce to those of GR. At linear order the non-conservation law introduces λ-dependent source terms in the continuity and Euler equations; these terms are retained in the system and are solved together with the Regge-Wheeler polar perturbations. The resulting solutions exhibit the reported GR-like propagation with an overall λ-dependent amplitude. To make the handling of the modified conservation equations fully explicit we will add a short subsection (or appendix) that derives the linear-order continuity and Euler equations under the Regge-Wheeler ansatz and verifies consistency with the obtained solutions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: solutions derived directly from perturbed field equations

full rationale

The paper starts from the R+2λT field equations in flat FRW, applies the standard Regge-Wheeler polar ansatz, writes the linearized equations for metric, density and velocity perturbations, and solves them algebraically in the radiation and dark-energy eras. The resulting expressions for the perturbation amplitudes are outputs of those differential equations, not re-statements of fitted inputs or prior self-citations. λ enters as an explicit free parameter whose effect on wave amplitude is then examined; no parameter is tuned to a subset of data and then called a prediction. No self-citation is invoked to justify uniqueness or to smuggle an ansatz. The derivation chain therefore remains independent of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis relies on the standard assumptions of cosmological perturbation theory in modified gravity and the choice of the linear f(R,T) model.

free parameters (1)
  • λ
    The model parameter whose impact on GW amplitude is discussed.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption The background spacetime is a spatially flat FRW universe with perfect fluid
    Stated in the abstract as the universe model.
  • domain assumption Polar gravitational waves are induced via Regge-Wheeler perturbations
    The perturbation method used.
  • domain assumption The f(R,T) model is R + 2λT
    The specific scenario investigated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5664 in / 1320 out tokens · 25520 ms · 2026-05-24T23:15:37.374266+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Buchdahl, H. A.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 150(1970)1. 14

    work page 1970

  2. [2]

    and Odintsov, S.D.: Phys

    Nojiri, S. and Odintsov, S.D.: Phys. Lett. B 631(2005)1

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    and Odintsov, S.D.: Phys

    Harko, T., Lobo, F.S.N., Nojiri, S. and Odintsov, S.D.: Phys. Rev. D 84(2011)024020

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    and Peebles, L.: Phys

    Ratra, P. and Peebles, L.: Phys. Rev. D 37(1988)3406.; Caldwell, R.R., Dave, R. and Steinhardt, P.J.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 80(1998)1582

    work page 1988

  5. [5]

    and Pasquier, V.: Phys

    Kamenshchik, A.Yu, Moschella, U. and Pasquier, V.: Phys. Lett. B 511(2001)265; Bento, M.C., Bertolami, O. and Sen, A.A.: Phys. Rev. D 66(2002)043507

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    Caldwell, R.R.: Phys. Lett. B 545(2002)23

    work page 2002

  7. [7]

    and Geshnizjani, G.: Phys

    Afshordi, N., Chung, D.J.H. and Geshnizjani, G.: Phys. Rev. D 75(2007)083513

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    Setare, M.R.: Phys. Lett. B 648(2007)329; ibid. 653(2007)116

    work page 2007

  9. [9]

    and Saridakis, E.N.: Rept

    Cai, Y.F., Capozziello, S., De Laurentis, M. and Saridakis, E.N.: Rept. Prog. Phys. 79(2016)106901

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Jamil, M. et al. : Eur. Phys. J. C 72(2012)1999

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    Houndjo, M.J.S.: Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 21(2012)1250003

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    and Nawazish, I.: Eur

    Sharif, M. and Nawazish, I.: Eur. Phys. J. C 77(2017)198

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    and Siddiqa, A.: Mod

    Sharif, M. and Siddiqa, A.: Mod. Phys. Lett. A 32(2017)1750151

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    and Siddiqa, A.: Commun

    Sharif, M. and Siddiqa, A.: Commun. Theor. Phys. 69(2018)537

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    and Zubair, M.: J

    Sharif, M. and Zubair, M.: J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03(2012)028

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    and Myrzakulov, R.: Chin

    Jamil, M., Momeni, D. and Myrzakulov, R.: Chin. Phys. Lett. 29(2012)109801

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    and Zubair, M.: Exp

    Sharif, M. and Zubair, M.: Exp. Theor. Phys. 117(2013)248,

    work page 2013

  18. [18]

    and Myrzakulov R.: Astrophys

    Momeni, D., Moraes, P.H.R.S. and Myrzakulov R.: Astrophys. Spac e Sci. 361(2016)228

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    and Zubair, M.: Astrophys

    Noureen, I. and Zubair, M.: Astrophys. Space Sci. 356(2015)103. 15

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    and Noureen, I.: Astrophys

    Zubair, M., Abbas, G. and Noureen, I.: Astrophys. Space Sci. 361(2016)8

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    and Malheiro, M.: J

    Moraes, P.H.R.S., Jos´e D.V.A. and Malheiro, M.: J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06(2016)005

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    and Waseem, A.: Can

    Sharif, M. and Waseem, A.: Can. J. Phys. 94(2016)1024

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    Carvalho, G.A. et al. : Eur. Phys. J. C 77(2017)871

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    and Ume Farwa: Class

    Yousaf, Z., Bhatti, M.Z. and Ume Farwa: Class. Quantum Grav. 34(2017)145002

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    and Siddiqa, A.: Eur

    Sharif, M. and Siddiqa, A.: Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132(2017)529

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    and Siddiqa, A.: Int

    Sharif, M. and Siddiqa, A.: Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27(2018)1850065

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    and Ahmad, Y.: Eur

    Zubair, M., Waheed, S. and Ahmad, Y.: Eur. Phys. J. C 76(2016)444

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    and Sahoo, P.K.: Phys

    Moraes, P.H.R.S. and Sahoo, P.K.: Phys. Rev. D 96(2017)044038

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    Mustafa, Waheed, S

    Zubair, M., G. Mustafa, Waheed, S. and Abbas, G.: Eur. Phys. J . C 77(2017)680

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    and Sahoo, P.: Eur

    Sahoo, P.K., Moraes, P.H.R.S. and Sahoo, P.: Eur. Phys. J. C 78(2018)46

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    et al .: Phys

    Abbott, B.P. et al .: Phys. Rev. Lett. 116(2016)061102

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    et al .: Phys

    Abbott, B.P. et al .: Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(2017)221101

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    et al .: Phys

    Abbott, B.P. et al .: Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(2017)161101

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    and Jetzer, P.: Phys

    Kausar, H.R., Philippoz, L. and Jetzer, P.: Phys. Rev. D 93(2016)124071

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    and Siddiqa, A.: Astrophys

    Sharif, M. and Siddiqa, A.: Astrophys. Space Sci. 362(2017)226

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    and Malheiro, M.: Phys

    Alves, M.E.S., Moraes, P.H.R.S., de Araujo, J.C.N. and Malheiro, M.: Phys. Rev. D 94(2016)024032

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    and Siddiqa, A.: Phys

    Sharif, M. and Siddiqa, A.: Phys. Dark Universe 15(2017)105

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    and Wheeler, J.A.: Phys

    Regge, T. and Wheeler, J.A.: Phys. Rev. 108(1957)1063. 16

    work page 1957

  39. [39]

    Zerilli, F.J.: Phys. Rev. D 02(1970)2141

    work page 1970

  40. [40]

    and Wyl¸ e˙ zek, G.: Class

    Malec, E. and Wyl¸ e˙ zek, G.: Class. Quantum Grav. 22(2005)3549

    work page 2005

  41. [41]

    Stewart, J.M., Walker, M.: Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 341(1974)49

    work page 1974

  42. [42]

    and Ge rgely, L.A.: J

    Keresztes, Z., Forsberg, M., Bradley, M., Dunsby, P.K.S. and Ge rgely, L.A.: J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2015(2015)042

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    and Keresztes, Z.: Universe 3(2017)69

    Bradley, M., Forsberg, M. and Keresztes, Z.: Universe 3(2017)69

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    Quantum Grav

    Viaggiu, S.: Class. Quantum Grav. 34(2017)035018

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    and Malec, E.: Class

    Kulczycki, W. and Malec, E.: Class. Quantum Grav. 34(2017)135014

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    and Malec, E.: Phys

    Kulczycki, W. and Malec, E.: Phys. Rev. D 96(2017)063523

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    and Sengupta, U.K.: Phys

    Gerlach, U.H. and Sengupta, U.K.: Phys. Rev. D 19(1979)2268; ibid. 22 (1980)1300

    work page 1979

  48. [48]

    and Martin-Garcia, J.M.: Phys

    Gundlach, C. and Martin-Garcia, J.M.: Phys. Rev. D 61(2000)084024

    work page 2000

  49. [49]

    and February, S.: J

    Clarkson, C., Clifton, T. and February, S.: J. Cosmol. Astropar t. Phys. 06(2009)25

    work page 2009

  50. [50]

    and Siddiqa, A.: Eur

    Sharif, M. and Siddiqa, A.: Eur. Phys. J. C 78(2018)721

    work page 2018

  51. [51]

    Poplawski, N.J.: arXiv:gr-qc/0608031

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    Faraoni, V.: Phys. Rev. D 80(2009)124040

    work page 2009

  53. [53]

    and Shahidi, S.: Phys

    Haghani, Z., Harko, T., Lobo, F.S.N., Sepangi, H.R. and Shahidi, S.: Phys. Rev. D 88(2013)044023; Sharif, M. and Zubair, M.: Astrophys. Space Sci. 349(2014)529

    work page 2013

  54. [54]

    Abbott, B.P. et al. : Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(2018)091101

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    Quantum Grav

    Favata, M.: Class. Quantum Grav. 27(2010)084036

    work page 2010

  56. [56]

    and Xue, L.: Phys

    Cai, Y.F., Li, C., Saridakis, E.N. and Xue, L.: Phys. Rev. D 97(2018)103513

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    and Saridakis, E.N.: J

    Li, C., Cai, Y., Cai, Y.F. and Saridakis, E.N.: J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10(2018)001. 17

    work page 2018

  58. [58]

    and Yi, Z.: Eur

    Gong, Y., Papantonopoulos, E. and Yi, Z.: Eur. Phys. J. C 78(2018)738. 18

    work page 2018