pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.06526 · v1 · pith:KH44QSS4new · submitted 2019-07-15 · 🪐 quant-ph

Quantum image distillation

Hugo Defienne , Matthew Reichert , Jason W Fleischer , Daniele Faccio This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 21:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum imagingimage distillationintensity correlationsquantum lightclassical lightphoton correlationssuperposition separation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Intensity correlation measurements separate a quantum image from classical light even when spectra and polarizations match.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a quantum image formed by correlated photons can be extracted from data that also contains a classical image formed by uncorrelated photons. Separation occurs through intensity correlation measurements alone. This matters because quantum detectors readily pick up classical noise that would otherwise erase any quantum advantage, and the method works without needing differences in spectrum or polarization to filter the signals.

Core claim

We experimentally demonstrate distillation of a quantum image from measured data composed of a superposition of both quantum and classical light. We measure the image of an object formed under quantum illumination that is mixed with another image produced by classical light with the same spectrum and polarisation and we demonstrate near-perfect separation of the two superimposed images by intensity correlation measurements.

What carries the argument

Intensity correlation measurements that exploit the difference between correlated photon pairs in the quantum component and uncorrelated photons in the classical component.

If this is right

  • Quantum imaging can proceed in the presence of classical background light without spectral or polarization filtering.
  • The same correlation approach enables mixing and subsequent distinction of quantum and classical information in a single measurement.
  • The method opens routes to quantum communications and security applications that must operate amid classical noise.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The technique could be tested with partial spectral overlap to measure how much mismatch the correlation filter can tolerate before performance drops.
  • It points toward using photon-correlation properties as a general filter in other quantum sensing or information tasks where classical noise overlaps in spectrum.
  • Real-time versions might allow dynamic separation during live imaging with varying classical interference.

Load-bearing premise

The quantum and classical light components share identical spectrum and polarization so that separation relies only on their differing correlation properties.

What would settle it

If intensity correlation measurements on the mixed field fail to produce distinct separated images when the quantum and classical components have identical spectrum and polarization, the claimed distillation does not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.06526 by Daniele Faccio, Hugo Defienne, Jason W Fleischer, Matthew Reichert.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Experimental apparatus. Light emitted by a diode laser (λp “ 405nm) illuminates β-Barium Borate (BBO) crystal of 0.5 mm thickness to produce spatially en￾tangled pairs of photons by type-I SPDC. Long-pass filters (LPF) positioned after the crystal remove pump photons. Lenses f1 “ 35mm and f2 “ 75mm image the crystal surface onto an object O1 (‘dead cat’). Simultaneously, an object O2 (‘alive cat’) is illum… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Separation of mixed quantum-classical images. The direct-intensity image (a) acquired by accumulating photons on the camera sensor shows a superposition of both objects O1 (quantum) and O2 (classical), representing respectively a ‘dead’ and an ‘alive’ cat. Intensity correlation function Γpr, rq (b) measured with the camera shows the image of O1 . An image of O2 (c) is obtained by subtracting the reconstruc… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Characterization of residual single-photon intensity. Direct-intensity image (a) acquired with the LED turned off shows object O3 (the number ‘3’). The image is deliberately slightly defocused by positioning it out of the focal plane of the imaging system. Direct-intensity image (b) acquired with the SPDC turned off shows the ground-truth image of O4 (the number ‘6’). Direct-intensity image (c) acquired wi… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Single-to-noise ratio (SNR) in quantum distilled images. (a) SNRs are represented as function of average intensity ratio between classical and quantum light Icl{Iqu (black crosses) together with a theoretical model (blue dashed line). In this experiment, both sources illuminate ho￾mogeneously the camera sensor (b) and SNRs are measured by dividing the peak intensity by the standard deviation of the noise i… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (b) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Imaging with quantum states of light promises advantages over classical approaches in terms of resolution, signal-to-noise ratio and sensitivity. However, quantum detectors are particularly sensitive sources of classical noise that can reduce or cancel any quantum advantage in the final result. Without operating in the single-photon counting regime, we experimentally demonstrate distillation of a quantum image from measured data composed of a superposition of both quantum and classical light. We measure the image of an object formed under quantum illumination (correlated photons) that is mixed with another image produced by classical light (uncorrelated photons) with the same spectrum and polarisation and we demonstrate near-perfect separation of the two superimposed images by intensity correlation measurements. This work provides a novel approach to mix and distinguish information carried by quantum and classical light, which may be useful for quantum imaging, communications, and security.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript experimentally demonstrates distillation of a quantum image from measured data consisting of a superposition of quantum illumination (correlated photons) and classical light (uncorrelated photons) that share identical spectrum and polarization. Intensity correlation measurements are used to achieve near-perfect separation of the two superimposed images without operating in the single-photon counting regime.

Significance. If the experimental results hold, the work provides a practical approach to mix and distinguish quantum and classical information in imaging based solely on intensity correlations, with potential utility for quantum imaging, communications, and security applications.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of 'near-perfect separation' is presented as an experimental result, yet the provided manuscript text contains no quantitative metrics, raw correlation data, error bars, statistical analysis, or figures supporting the separation fidelity; this is load-bearing for the experimental demonstration.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and constructive comment on our manuscript. We address the single major comment below and agree that strengthening the quantitative support for our central claim will improve the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of 'near-perfect separation' is presented as an experimental result, yet the provided manuscript text contains no quantitative metrics, raw correlation data, error bars, statistical analysis, or figures supporting the separation fidelity; this is load-bearing for the experimental demonstration.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract's claim of near-perfect separation requires explicit quantitative backing to be fully substantiated. While the manuscript describes the intensity-correlation procedure and includes figures showing the separated images, we acknowledge that dedicated numerical metrics (e.g., fidelity values, contrast ratios), example raw correlation datasets, error bars, and statistical analysis are not presented with sufficient prominence. In the revised manuscript we will add these elements, including a new table or expanded results section that reports the measured separation fidelity with uncertainties derived from the correlation data. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental demonstration of image separation via intensity correlations between quantum-illuminated and classically illuminated components that share spectrum and polarization. The separation principle follows directly from the standard definition of second-order intensity correlations (g^(2) > 1 for correlated pairs, g^(2) = 1 for uncorrelated), without any fitted parameters, self-referential equations, or load-bearing self-citations. The mixing condition is stated explicitly as an experimental input, and the reported near-perfect separation is a measured outcome rather than a quantity forced by construction from the inputs. No derivation chain exists that reduces to its own assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard quantum optics assumptions about photon correlations distinguishing quantum from classical light; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract description.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Intensity correlations between photon pairs can isolate quantum illumination signals from uncorrelated classical light
    Core mechanism invoked for the distillation; standard in quantum optics literature.
  • domain assumption Quantum and classical images can be superimposed while sharing identical spectrum and polarization
    Explicit mixing condition stated in the abstract that enables the correlation-based separation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5660 in / 1200 out tokens · 21138 ms · 2026-05-24T21:29:21.047277+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Photons are transformed into photo-electrons by a photo-sensitive screen of quantum efficiency η

    work page

  2. [2]

    Photo-electrons are transformed into intensity val- ues Ik by an amplification register. For k photo- electrons at the input of the register, the camera returns an average grey value that is proportional tok: Ik“Ak`x0, where x0 is an electronic noise mean value and A is an amplification parameter. The camera acquires a set ofN imagestIlulPrr1,Nssusing a fixe...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Acquisition of a set of N imagestIlulPrr1,Nss at fixed exposure time τ “ 6ms, with N on the order of 106´7

    work page

  4. [4]

    Estimation of the first term of equation (2) by mul- tiplying pixel values in each image by themselves and averaging over the set: xIpr1qIpr2qy« 1 N Nÿ l“1 Ilpr1qIlpr2q (14) in which r1 and r2 are pixel positions [ r1‰ r2]. 8

    work page

  5. [5]

    The second term in equation 15 is an estimation of the mean value of intensity product between different frames xIlpr1qIl‰l1pr2qy

    Estimation of the second term of equation (2) by multiplying pixel values in the lth image by those of the following image l` 1th and average over the set: xIpr1qyxIpr2qy« 1 N2 Nÿ l“1 Ilpr1qIl`1pr2q By definition,xIpr1qyxIpr2qy equals the limit NÑ `8 for the following summation: 1 N2 Nÿ l“1 Nÿ l1“1 Ilpr1qIl1pr2q“ 1 N2 Nÿ l“1 Ilpr1qIlpr2q` 1 N2 Nÿ l‰l1 Ilpr...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Subtraction between these two terms: Γpr1, r2q« 1 N Nÿ l“1 Ilpr1qIlpr2q´ 1 N2 Nÿ l‰l1 Ilpr1qIl1pr2q (17)

    work page

  7. [7]

    As shown in Section I, equation 12 is only valid for r1 ‰ r2. Estimation of the intensity correlation values Γpr, rq from those measured between pixel r “ px,yq is then performed using neighbouring pixels r1“px´δ,yq [δ“ 16µm“ pixel size]: Γpr, rq« Γppx,yq,px´δ,yqq (18) In our experiment, this approximation is valid be- cause the fill factor of the Andor Ix...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Conditional projection relative to an arbitrarily chosen position r1, defined as Γpr|r1q“ Γpr, r1qř r1 Γpr, r1q (19) It represents the probability of detecting a photon from a pair at position r under the condition that another photon is detected at r1

    work page

  9. [9]

    The minus-coordinate projection, defined as P Γ ´pr´q“ ÿ r Γpr´` r, rq (20) It represents the probability for two photons of a pair to be detected in coincidence between pairs of pixels separated by an oriented distance r´

    work page

  10. [10]

    Realization of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Para- dox Using Momentum- and Position-Entangled Photons from Spontaneous Parametric Down Conversion,

    J.C. Howell, R.S. Bennink, S.J. Bentley, and R. W. Boyd, “Realization of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Para- dox Using Momentum- and Position-Entangled Photons from Spontaneous Parametric Down Conversion,” Phys- ical Review Letters 92, 210403 (2004)

    work page 2004

  11. [11]

    Full- Field Quantum Correlations of Spatially Entangled Pho- tons,

    V. D. Salakhutdinov, E. R. Eliel, and W. Loffler, “Full- Field Quantum Correlations of Spatially Entangled Pho- tons,” Physical Review Letters 108, 173604 (2012)

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    Generation and con- firmation of a (100$ \times$ 100)-dimensional entangled quantum system,

    M. Krenn, M. Huber, R. Fickler, R. Lapkiewicz, S. Ramelow, and A. Zeilinger, “Generation and con- firmation of a (100$ \times$ 100)-dimensional entangled quantum system,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 6243–6247 (2014)

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    Spa- tiotemporal grouping of photons in spontaneous para- metric scattering of light,

    A. A. Malygin, A. N. Penin, and A. V. Sergienko, “Spa- tiotemporal grouping of photons in spontaneous para- metric scattering of light,” in Sov. Phys. Dokl, Vol. 30 (1985) pp. 227–229

    work page 1985

  14. [14]

    Optical imaging by means of two-photon quantum entanglement,

    T. B. Pittman, Y. H. Shih, D. V. Strekalov, and A. V. Sergienko, “Optical imaging by means of two-photon quantum entanglement,” Physical Review A 52, R3429– R3432 (1995)

    work page 1995

  15. [15]

    Detec- tion of Sub-Shot-Noise Spatial Correlation in High-Gain Parametric Down Conversion,

    O. Jedrkiewicz, Y.-K Jiang, E. Brambilla, A. Gatti, 9 M. Bache, L. A. Lugiato, and P. Di Trapani, “Detec- tion of Sub-Shot-Noise Spatial Correlation in High-Gain Parametric Down Conversion,” Physical Review Letters 93, 243601 (2004)

    work page 2004

  16. [16]

    Experi- mental realization of sub-shot-noise quantum imaging,

    G. Brida, M. Genovese, and I. Ruo Berchera, “Experi- mental realization of sub-shot-noise quantum imaging,” Nature Photonics 4, 227–230 (2010)

    work page 2010

  17. [17]

    Experimental observation of sub-Rayleigh quantum imaging with a two-photon en- tangled source,

    D-Q. Xu, X-B. Song, H-G. Li, D-J. Zhang, H-B. Wang, J. Xiong, and K. Wang, “Experimental observation of sub-Rayleigh quantum imaging with a two-photon en- tangled source,” Applied Physics Letters 106, 171104 (2015)

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    Multi-imaging and Bayesian estimation for pho- ton counting with EMCCDs,

    E. Lantz, J-L. Blanchet, L. Furfaro, and F. De- vaux, “Multi-imaging and Bayesian estimation for pho- ton counting with EMCCDs,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 386, 2262–2270 (2008)

    work page 2008

  19. [19]

    SPAD-based sensors,

    E. Charbon, M. Fishburn, R. Walker, R.K. Hen- derson, and C. Niclass, “SPAD-based sensors,” in TOF range-imaging cameras (Springer, 2013) pp. 11–38

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    Realization of the purely spatial Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen paradox in full-field images of spontaneous para- metric down-conversion,

    P-A. Moreau, J. Mougin-Sisini, F. Devaux, and E. Lantz, “Realization of the purely spatial Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen paradox in full-field images of spontaneous para- metric down-conversion,” Physical Review A 86, 010101 (2012)

    work page 2012

  21. [21]

    Imaging high-dimensional spatial entan- glement with a camera,

    D. S. Tasca, F. Izdebski, G. S. Buller, J. Leach, M. Ag- new, M. J. Padgett, M. P. Edgar, R. E. Warburton, and R. W. Boyd, “Imaging high-dimensional spatial entan- glement with a camera,” Nature Communications 3, 984 (2012)

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    Coincidence detection of spatially cor- related photon pairs with a monolithic time-resolving de- tector array,

    M. Unternahrer, B. Bessire, L. Gasparini, D. Stoppa, and A. Stefanov, “Coincidence detection of spatially cor- related photon pairs with a monolithic time-resolving de- tector array,” Optics Express 24, 28829–28841 (2016)

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    Sub-Rayleigh Imaging via $N$- Photon Detection,

    F. Guerrieri, L. Maccone, F.N.C. Wong, J.H. Shapiro, S. Tisa, and F. Zappa, “Sub-Rayleigh Imaging via $N$- Photon Detection,” Physical Review Letters 105, 163602 (2010)

    work page 2010

  24. [24]

    Superresolution Microscopy with Quantum Emitters,

    O. Schwartz, J.M. Levitt, R. Tenne, S. Itzhakov, Z. Deutsch, and D. Oron, “Superresolution Microscopy with Quantum Emitters,” Nano Letters 13, 5832–5836 (2013)

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    SPAD imagers for super resolution localiza- tion microscopy enable analysis of fast fluorophore blink- ing,

    I.M. Antolovic, S Burri, C Bruschini, R.A. Hoebe, and E Charbon, “SPAD imagers for super resolution localiza- tion microscopy enable analysis of fast fluorophore blink- ing,” Scientific Reports 7 (2017), 10.1038/srep44108

    work page doi:10.1038/srep44108 2017

  26. [26]

    Super-resolution enhancement by quantum image scanning microscopy,

    R. Tenne, U. Rossman, B. Rephael, Y. Israel, A. Krupinski-Ptaszek, R. Lapkiewicz, Y. Silberberg, and D. Oron, “Super-resolution enhancement by quantum image scanning microscopy,” Nature Photonics , 1 (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    Hacking commercial quan- tum cryptography systems by tailored bright illumina- tion,

    L. Lydersen, C. Wiechers, C. Wittmann, D. Elser, J. Skaar, and V. Makarov, “Hacking commercial quan- tum cryptography systems by tailored bright illumina- tion,” Nature Photonics 4, 686–689 (2010)

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    The quantum theory of optical coher- ence,

    R.J. Glauber, “The quantum theory of optical coher- ence,” Physical Review 130, 2529 (1963)

    work page 1963

  29. [29]

    Spatial correlations in parametric down- conversion,

    S. P. Walborn, C. H. Monken, S. Pdua, and P. H. Souto Ribeiro, “Spatial correlations in parametric down- conversion,” Physics Reports 495, 87–139 (2010)

    work page 2010

  30. [30]

    Introduction to the Transverse Spatial Correlations in Spontaneous Parametric Down-Conversion through the Biphoton Birth Zone

    J. Schneeloch and J.C. Howell, “Introduction to the Transverse Spatial Correlations in Spontaneous Paramet- ric Down-Conversion through the Biphoton Birth Zone,” Journal of Optics 18, 053501 (2016), arXiv: 1502.06996

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  31. [31]

    Entangled-photon Fourier optics,

    A.F. Abouraddy, B.EA Saleh, A.V. Sergienko, and M.C. Teich, “Entangled-photon Fourier optics,” JOSA B 19, 1174–1184 (2002)

    work page 2002

  32. [32]

    Biphoton transmission through non-unitary objects,

    M. Reichert, H. Defienne, X. Sun, and J.W. Fleischer, “Biphoton transmission through non-unitary objects,” Journal of Optics 19, 044004 (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Imaging high-dimensional spatial entan- glement with a camera,

    M. P. Edgar, D. S. Tasca, F. Izdebski, R. E. Warburton, J. Leach, M. Agnew, G. S. Buller, R. W. Boyd, and M. J. Padgett, “Imaging high-dimensional spatial entan- glement with a camera,” Nature Communications 3, 984 (2012)

    work page 2012

  34. [34]

    High-NOON States by Mixing Quantum and Classical Light,

    I. Afek, O. Ambar, and Y. Silberberg, “High-NOON States by Mixing Quantum and Classical Light,” Science 328, 879–881 (2010)

    work page 2010

  35. [35]

    Protecting entanglement of twisted photons by adaptive optics

    N. Leonhard, G. Sorelli, V.N. Shatokhin, C. Rein- lein, and A. Buchleitner, “Protecting entanglement of twisted photons by adaptive optics,” Physical Re- view A 97 (2018), 10.1103/PhysRevA.97.012321, arXiv: 1709.09887

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physreva.97.012321 2018

  36. [36]

    General model of photon-pair detection with an image sensor,

    H. Defienne, M. Reichert, and J.W. Fleischer, “General model of photon-pair detection with an image sensor,” Physical review letters 120, 203604 (2018)

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    Trans- verse entanglement migration in Hilbert space,

    K. W. Chan, J. P. Torres, and J. H. Eberly, “Trans- verse entanglement migration in Hilbert space,” Physical Review A 75, 050101 (2007)

    work page 2007

  38. [38]

    Optimizing the signal-to-noise ratio in the measurement of photon pairs with detector arrays,

    E. Lantz, P-A. Moreau, and F. Devaux, “Optimizing the signal-to-noise ratio in the measurement of photon pairs with detector arrays,” Physical Review A 90, 063811 (2014)

    work page 2014