Wormhole Modeling Supported by Non-Exotic Matter

Gauranga C. Samanta; Nisha Godani

arxiv: 1907.07344 · v1 · pith:MSTLPEGHnew · submitted 2019-07-17 · 🌀 gr-qc

Wormhole Modeling Supported by Non-Exotic Matter

Gauranga C. Samanta , Nisha Godani This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 20:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc

keywords wormholef(R) gravityenergy conditionstraversable wormholeshape functionmodified gravitynon-exotic matter

0 comments

The pith

A logarithmic shape function for wormholes in f(R) gravity permits non-exotic matter to satisfy energy conditions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors construct traversable wormhole solutions in f(R) gravity using the form f(R) equal to R minus a term involving the Ricci scalar raised to a power between zero and one. They employ a specific shape function previously introduced by the same authors to define the wormhole geometry. Analysis shows that the resulting stress-energy tensor satisfies the energy conditions, indicating that ordinary matter can support the wormhole. This matters because in standard general relativity, wormholes typically require exotic matter that violates energy conditions, making such models unphysical.

Core claim

In f(R) gravity with f(R)=R−μRc(R/Rc)p where 0<p<1, the shape function b(r)=r log(r+1)/log(r0+1) leads to stress-energy components that fulfill the null, weak, strong and dominant energy conditions, thereby modeling traversable wormholes supported by non-exotic matter.

What carries the argument

The shape function b(r)=r log(r+1)/log(r0+1) combined with the f(R) modification that alters the effective stress-energy requirements.

Load-bearing premise

The specific logarithmic shape function generates stress-energy components meeting the energy conditions under the chosen f(R) gravity model.

What would settle it

Demonstrating a violation of the null energy condition at the wormhole throat for this shape function and f(R) form would disprove the support by non-exotic matter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.07344 by Gauranga C. Samanta, Nisha Godani.

read the original abstract

In the present paper, the modelling of traversale wormholes, proposed by Morris \& Thorne \cite{morris1}, is performed within the $f(R)$ gravity with particular viable case $f(R)=R-\mu R_c\Big(\frac{R}{R_c}\Big)^p$, where $\mu, R_c>0$ and $0<p<1$. The energy conditions are analyzed using the shape function $b(r)=\frac{r\log(r+1)}{\log(r_0+1)}$ defined by Godani and Samanta \cite{godani} and geometric nature of wormholes is analyzed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The shape function violates the flaring-out condition at the throat, so the claimed traversable wormholes do not exist.

read the letter

The main thing here is that the shape function b(r) = r log(r+1)/log(r0+1) fails the basic Morris-Thorne requirement. Its derivative at r0 is 1 plus a positive term, so b'(r0) > 1. That means the geometry does not flare out, and you do not have a traversable wormhole regardless of the f(R) model or the stress-energy tensor. The paper takes this b(r) directly from the authors' earlier work and applies the standard f(R) = R - μ Rc (R/Rc)^p to it, then checks energy conditions for various parameter values. That is the extent of what is new: an application exercise rather than a new derivation or framework. The f(R) form itself is already known from cosmology, and the shape function is recycled from their prior paper. The calculations of the energy conditions and the geometric analysis are what the manuscript actually does. The soft spot is not minor. The flaring-out violation is load-bearing. Without a valid wormhole geometry, the question of whether the matter is exotic or not becomes irrelevant. The paper states it analyzes the geometric nature, but this basic check appears to have been missed. Parameter tuning of μ, Rc, p, and r0 cannot fix a shape function that does not satisfy the throat conditions. This is the kind of issue that makes the central claim collapse. The work is aimed at people already deep in wormhole modeling in modified gravity who might want to see the explicit stress-energy expressions for this particular combination. Most readers outside that narrow group will not get much from it. I would not bring it to a reading group, would not cite it, and would not send it to peer review. The flaw is straightforward and disqualifying.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper models traversable wormholes in f(R) gravity with the specific viable case f(R)=R−μRc(R/Rc)^p (μ,Rc>0, 0<p<1), using the shape function b(r)=r log(r+1)/log(r0+1) from prior work. It analyzes the energy conditions to claim that the wormholes are supported by non-exotic matter and examines the geometric nature of the wormholes.

Significance. If the central claim held, the work would provide an explicit construction of traversable wormholes in this f(R) theory supported by ordinary matter satisfying the energy conditions. The result does not hold, however, because the underlying geometry is invalid.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract (shape function definition): The given shape function b(r)=r log(r+1)/log(r0+1) violates the flaring-out condition required by the Morris-Thorne traversable wormhole metric. Its derivative evaluates to b'(r)=(1/log(r0+1)) * [log(r+1) + r/(r+1)], so that b'(r0)=1 + [r0/(r0+1)]/log(r0+1) >1 for any r0>0. Morris-Thorne wormholes require b'(r0)<1 to ensure (b−r b')/b^2 >0 at the throat. This geometric defect is independent of the choice of f(R) parameters or stress-energy tensor and renders the proposed model invalid.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract states that energy conditions are analyzed but supplies no explicit substitution, no verification that the inequalities hold after inserting the shape function and f(R) form, and no discussion of how the free parameters μ, Rc, p, r0 are chosen.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and for identifying an important issue with the shape function used in our manuscript. We address this comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (shape function definition): The given shape function b(r)=r log(r+1)/log(r0+1) violates the flaring-out condition required by the Morris-Thorne traversable wormhole metric. Its derivative evaluates to b'(r)=(1/log(r0+1)) * [log(r+1) + r/(r+1)], so that b'(r0)=1 + [r0/(r0+1)]/log(r0+1) >1 for any r0>0. Morris-Thorne wormholes require b'(r0)<1 to ensure (b−r b')/b^2 >0 at the throat. This geometric defect is independent of the choice of f(R) parameters or stress-energy tensor and renders the proposed model invalid.

Authors: We agree with the referee's calculation. The derivative b'(r) is indeed as stated, leading to b'(r0) > 1 for any r0 > 0. This violates the flaring-out condition b'(r0) < 1 required for the Morris-Thorne wormhole to be traversable. We acknowledge that this renders the specific model presented in the manuscript invalid. We will revise the manuscript by adopting a shape function that satisfies the flaring-out condition, such as one from the literature that meets b'(r0) < 1, and will re-evaluate the energy conditions and geometric properties accordingly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper adopts an ansatz shape function b(r) from prior self-work and a standard f(R) form, then computes the resulting stress-energy tensor components and checks energy conditions. No step equates a claimed prediction or first-principles result to its own inputs by construction; the energy-condition analysis follows directly from the Einstein equations modified by f(R) and the given metric functions. The self-citation supplies only the choice of coordinate function b(r), which remains an external modeling input rather than a derived output. No fitted parameters are renamed as predictions, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled via self-citation to force the final claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the Morris-Thorne metric ansatz, the chosen f(R) functional form, and the authors' earlier shape function. No new physical entities are introduced. Free parameters are the model constants μ, Rc, p and the throat radius r0.

free parameters (4)

μ
Dimensionless parameter controlling the deviation from GR in the f(R) model.
Rc
Characteristic curvature scale in the f(R) model.
p
Exponent with 0 < p < 1 in the f(R) model.
r0
Throat radius appearing in the shape function definition.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The spacetime is described by the Morris-Thorne traversable wormhole metric.
Standard ansatz invoked for all wormhole modeling in the paper.
domain assumption The f(R) model with 0 < p < 1 is a viable modified gravity theory.
Background assumption taken from prior f(R) literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5624 in / 1501 out tokens · 26581 ms · 2026-05-24T20:32:49.419881+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The existence of wormhole solutions demands ... (iii) b'(r0)−1≤0 ... shape function b(r)=r log(r+1)/log(r0+1)
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

f(R)=R−μRc(R/Rc)^p ... energy conditions ... non-exotic matter

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · 13 internal anchors

[1]

M. S. Morris and K. S. Thorne, Am. J. Phys. 56 (1988) 395

work page 1988
[2]

Flamm, Phys

L. Flamm, Phys. Z. 17 (1916) 448

work page 1916
[3]

Einstein and N

A. Einstein and N. Rosen, Ann. Phys. 2 (1935) 242. 11

work page 1935
[4]

S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Spacetime, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1973)

work page 1973
[5]

Kar, Phys

S. Kar, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 862

work page 1994
[6]

Wang and P

A. Wang and P. S. Letelier, GR-QC-9506003 (1995)

work page 1995
[7]

Kar and D

S. Kar and D. Sahdev, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 722

work page 1996
[8]

Visser, Lorentzian Wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking, (AIP, New York, 1995)

M. Visser, Lorentzian Wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking, (AIP, New York, 1995)

work page 1995
[9]

T. A. Roman, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 1370-1379

work page 1993
[10]

Poisson and M

E. Poisson and M. Visser, arXiv:9506083v1 [gr-qc] (1995)

work page 1995
[11]

Traversable wormholes from massless conformally coupled scalar fields

C. Barcel´ o and M. Visser, arXiv:gr-qc/9908029v1 (1999)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[12]

P. F. Gonz´ alez-D´ ıaz, arXiv:astro-ph/0308382v1 (2003)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[13]

Visser, S

M. Visser, S. Kar and N. Dadhich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 201102

work page 2003
[14]

P. F. Gonz´ alez-D´ ıaz, arXiv:astro-ph/0404045v2 (2004)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[15]

Sushkov, arXiv:0502084v1 [gr-qc] (2005)

S. Sushkov, arXiv:0502084v1 [gr-qc] (2005)

work page 2005
[16]

F. S. N. Lobo, arXiv:0502099v2 [gr-qc] (2005)

work page 2005
[17]

F. S. N. Lobo, arXiv:0506001v2 [gr-qc] (2005)

work page 2005
[18]

C. G. B¨ ohmer, T. Harko and F. S. N. Lobo, arXiv:0708.1537v3 [gr-qc] (2007)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[19]

Dotti, J

G. Dotti, J. Oliva, and R. Troncoso, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 024002

work page 2007
[20]

K. A. Bronnikov and V. G. Krechet, arXiv:1807.03641v1 [gr-qc] (2018)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[21]

S. D. Forghani, H. Mazharimousavi and M. Halilsoy, arXiv:1807.10343v1 [gr-qc] (2018)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[22]

N-dimensional static and evolving Lorentzian wormholes with cosmological constant

M. Cataldo, P. Meza and P. Minning, arXiv:1101.5034v1 [gr-qc] (2011)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[23]

Heydarzade, N

Y. Heydarzade, N. Riazi and H. Moradpour, Canad. J. Phys. 93 (2015) 1523-1531

work page 2015
[24]

Moradpour, N

H. Moradpour, N. Sadeghnezhad and S. H. Hendi, Can. J. Phys. 95 (2017) 1257-1266

work page 2017
[25]

R. A. El-Nabulsi, Can. J. Phys. 95 (2017)

work page 2017
[26]

Curvature Quintessence

S. Capozziello, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 11, 483 (2002) [gr-qc/0201033]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[27]

Quintessence without scalar fields

S. Capozziello, S. Carloni and A. Troisi, Recent Res. Dev. Astron. Astrophys. 1, 625 (2003) [astro-ph/0303041]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[28]

Nojiri and S

S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 123512

work page 2003
[29]

Faraoni, Phys

V. Faraoni, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 023529. 12

work page 2006
[30]

Hu and I

W. Hu and I. Sawicki, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 064004

work page 2007
[31]

Faulkner, M

T. Faulkner, M. Tegmark, E. F. Bunn, and Y. Mao, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 063505

work page 2007
[32]

P. J. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 024007

work page 2007
[33]

Sawicki and W

I. Sawicki and W. Hu, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 127502

work page 2007
[34]

Capozziello and S

S. Capozziello and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 107501

work page 2008
[35]

Amendola and S

L. Amendola and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Lett. B 660 (2008) 125

work page 2008
[36]

G. C. Samanta and S. N. Dhal, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52 (2013) 1334

work page 2013
[37]

G. C. Samanta, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52 (2013) 2647

work page 2013
[38]

G. C. Samanta, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52 (2013) 2303

work page 2013
[39]

P. H. R. S. Moraes, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 168

work page 2015
[40]

P. H. R. S. Moraes, G. Ribeiro and R. A. C. Correa, Astrophys. Space Sci. 361 (2016) 227

work page 2016
[41]

Yousaf, K

Z. Yousaf, K. Bamba and M. Z. Bhatti, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 1

work page 2016
[42]

Shabani and A

H. Shabani and A. H. Ziaie, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 31

work page 2017
[43]

G. C. Samanta and R. Myrzakulov, Chin. J. Phys. 55 (2017) 1044

work page 2017
[44]

G. C. Samanta, R. Myrzakulov and P. Shah, Zeitschrift fr Naturforschung A 74 (2017) 365

work page 2017
[45]

N Godani Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 16 1950024 (2019)

work page 2019
[46]

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-018-01363-w

N Godani Indian J Phys (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-018-01363-w

work page doi:10.1007/s12648-018-01363-w 2019
[47]

Amendola, R

L. Amendola, R. Gannouji, D. Polarski and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 083504

work page 2007
[48]

Nojiri and S

S. Nojiri and S. Odintsov, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 4 (2007) 115

work page 2007
[49]

De Felice and S

A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, Living Rev. Rel. 13 (2010) 3

work page 2010
[50]

Extended Theories of Gravity

S. Capozziello, M. De Laurentis, arXiv:1108.6266 (2011)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[51]

Bamba, S

K. Bamba, S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Astrophys. Space Sci. 342 (2012) 155

work page 2012
[52]

de Martino, M

I. de Martino, M. De Laurentis and S. Capozziello, Universe 1 (2015) 123

work page 2015
[53]

Cognola, E

G. Cognola, E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, L. Sebastiani and S. Zerbini, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 046009

work page 2008
[54]

E. V. Linder, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 123528. 13

work page 2009
[55]

Amendola and S

L. Amendola and S. Tsujikawa, Dark Energy: Theory and Observations (Cambridge Univer- sity Press, Cambridge, 2013)

work page 2013
[56]

Nojiri, S

S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou, Phys. Rept. 692 (2017) 1-104

work page 2017
[57]

Nojiri, O

S. Nojiri, O. Obregon, S. D. Odintsov and K. E. Osetrin, Phys. Lett. B 449 (1999) 173-179

work page 1999
[58]

Nojiri, O

S. Nojiri, O. Obregon, S. D. Odintsov and K. E. Osetrin, Phys. Lett. B 458 (1999) 19-28

work page 1999
[59]

F. S. N. Lobo and M. A. Oliveira, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 104012

work page 2009
[60]

Saiedi and B N

H. Saiedi and B N. Esfahani, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 26 (2011) 1211

work page 2011
[61]

Thermodynamics of Evolving Lorentzian Wormholes at Apparent Horizon in $f(R)$ Theory of Gravity

H. Saiedi, arXiv:1409.2179v1 [gr-qc] (2014)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[62]

Cosmological wormholes in $f(R)$ theories of gravity

S. Bahamonde, M. Jamil, P. Pavlovic and M. Sossich, arXiv:1606.05295v2 [gr-qc] (2016)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[63]

P. K. F. Kuhﬁttig, Ind. J. Phys. 92 (2018) 1207

work page 2018
[64]

Godani and G

N. Godani and G. C. Samanta, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 28 (2018) 1950039

work page 2018
[65]

G. C. Samanta, N. Godani and K. Bamba, arXiv:1811.06834v1 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[66]

Nojiri and S

S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Gen. Rel. Grav. 36 (2004) 17651780

work page 2004
[67]

Nojiri and S

S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rep. 505 (2011) 59144

work page 2011
[68]

Inflation constraints for classes of f(R) models

J. Ntahompagaze, J. D. Mbarubucyeye, S. Sahlu and A. Abebe, arXiv:1810.03291v2 [gr-qc] (2018). 14

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[1] [1]

M. S. Morris and K. S. Thorne, Am. J. Phys. 56 (1988) 395

work page 1988

[2] [2]

Flamm, Phys

L. Flamm, Phys. Z. 17 (1916) 448

work page 1916

[3] [3]

Einstein and N

A. Einstein and N. Rosen, Ann. Phys. 2 (1935) 242. 11

work page 1935

[4] [4]

S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Spacetime, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1973)

work page 1973

[5] [5]

Kar, Phys

S. Kar, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 862

work page 1994

[6] [6]

Wang and P

A. Wang and P. S. Letelier, GR-QC-9506003 (1995)

work page 1995

[7] [7]

Kar and D

S. Kar and D. Sahdev, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 722

work page 1996

[8] [8]

Visser, Lorentzian Wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking, (AIP, New York, 1995)

M. Visser, Lorentzian Wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking, (AIP, New York, 1995)

work page 1995

[9] [9]

T. A. Roman, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 1370-1379

work page 1993

[10] [10]

Poisson and M

E. Poisson and M. Visser, arXiv:9506083v1 [gr-qc] (1995)

work page 1995

[11] [11]

Traversable wormholes from massless conformally coupled scalar fields

C. Barcel´ o and M. Visser, arXiv:gr-qc/9908029v1 (1999)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

[12] [12]

P. F. Gonz´ alez-D´ ıaz, arXiv:astro-ph/0308382v1 (2003)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

[13] [13]

Visser, S

M. Visser, S. Kar and N. Dadhich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 201102

work page 2003

[14] [14]

P. F. Gonz´ alez-D´ ıaz, arXiv:astro-ph/0404045v2 (2004)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

[15] [15]

Sushkov, arXiv:0502084v1 [gr-qc] (2005)

S. Sushkov, arXiv:0502084v1 [gr-qc] (2005)

work page 2005

[16] [16]

F. S. N. Lobo, arXiv:0502099v2 [gr-qc] (2005)

work page 2005

[17] [17]

F. S. N. Lobo, arXiv:0506001v2 [gr-qc] (2005)

work page 2005

[18] [18]

C. G. B¨ ohmer, T. Harko and F. S. N. Lobo, arXiv:0708.1537v3 [gr-qc] (2007)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

[19] [19]

Dotti, J

G. Dotti, J. Oliva, and R. Troncoso, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 024002

work page 2007

[20] [20]

K. A. Bronnikov and V. G. Krechet, arXiv:1807.03641v1 [gr-qc] (2018)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[21] [21]

S. D. Forghani, H. Mazharimousavi and M. Halilsoy, arXiv:1807.10343v1 [gr-qc] (2018)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[22] [22]

N-dimensional static and evolving Lorentzian wormholes with cosmological constant

M. Cataldo, P. Meza and P. Minning, arXiv:1101.5034v1 [gr-qc] (2011)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

[23] [23]

Heydarzade, N

Y. Heydarzade, N. Riazi and H. Moradpour, Canad. J. Phys. 93 (2015) 1523-1531

work page 2015

[24] [24]

Moradpour, N

H. Moradpour, N. Sadeghnezhad and S. H. Hendi, Can. J. Phys. 95 (2017) 1257-1266

work page 2017

[25] [25]

R. A. El-Nabulsi, Can. J. Phys. 95 (2017)

work page 2017

[26] [26]

Curvature Quintessence

S. Capozziello, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 11, 483 (2002) [gr-qc/0201033]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

[27] [27]

Quintessence without scalar fields

S. Capozziello, S. Carloni and A. Troisi, Recent Res. Dev. Astron. Astrophys. 1, 625 (2003) [astro-ph/0303041]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

[28] [28]

Nojiri and S

S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 123512

work page 2003

[29] [29]

Faraoni, Phys

V. Faraoni, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 023529. 12

work page 2006

[30] [30]

Hu and I

W. Hu and I. Sawicki, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 064004

work page 2007

[31] [31]

Faulkner, M

T. Faulkner, M. Tegmark, E. F. Bunn, and Y. Mao, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 063505

work page 2007

[32] [32]

P. J. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 024007

work page 2007

[33] [33]

Sawicki and W

I. Sawicki and W. Hu, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 127502

work page 2007

[34] [34]

Capozziello and S

S. Capozziello and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 107501

work page 2008

[35] [35]

Amendola and S

L. Amendola and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Lett. B 660 (2008) 125

work page 2008

[36] [36]

G. C. Samanta and S. N. Dhal, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52 (2013) 1334

work page 2013

[37] [37]

G. C. Samanta, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52 (2013) 2647

work page 2013

[38] [38]

G. C. Samanta, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52 (2013) 2303

work page 2013

[39] [39]

P. H. R. S. Moraes, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 168

work page 2015

[40] [40]

P. H. R. S. Moraes, G. Ribeiro and R. A. C. Correa, Astrophys. Space Sci. 361 (2016) 227

work page 2016

[41] [41]

Yousaf, K

Z. Yousaf, K. Bamba and M. Z. Bhatti, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 1

work page 2016

[42] [42]

Shabani and A

H. Shabani and A. H. Ziaie, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 31

work page 2017

[43] [43]

G. C. Samanta and R. Myrzakulov, Chin. J. Phys. 55 (2017) 1044

work page 2017

[44] [44]

G. C. Samanta, R. Myrzakulov and P. Shah, Zeitschrift fr Naturforschung A 74 (2017) 365

work page 2017

[45] [45]

N Godani Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 16 1950024 (2019)

work page 2019

[46] [46]

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-018-01363-w

N Godani Indian J Phys (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-018-01363-w

work page doi:10.1007/s12648-018-01363-w 2019

[47] [47]

Amendola, R

L. Amendola, R. Gannouji, D. Polarski and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 083504

work page 2007

[48] [48]

Nojiri and S

S. Nojiri and S. Odintsov, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 4 (2007) 115

work page 2007

[49] [49]

De Felice and S

A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, Living Rev. Rel. 13 (2010) 3

work page 2010

[50] [50]

Extended Theories of Gravity

S. Capozziello, M. De Laurentis, arXiv:1108.6266 (2011)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

[51] [51]

Bamba, S

K. Bamba, S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Astrophys. Space Sci. 342 (2012) 155

work page 2012

[52] [52]

de Martino, M

I. de Martino, M. De Laurentis and S. Capozziello, Universe 1 (2015) 123

work page 2015

[53] [53]

Cognola, E

G. Cognola, E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, L. Sebastiani and S. Zerbini, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 046009

work page 2008

[54] [54]

E. V. Linder, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 123528. 13

work page 2009

[55] [55]

Amendola and S

L. Amendola and S. Tsujikawa, Dark Energy: Theory and Observations (Cambridge Univer- sity Press, Cambridge, 2013)

work page 2013

[56] [56]

Nojiri, S

S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou, Phys. Rept. 692 (2017) 1-104

work page 2017

[57] [57]

Nojiri, O

S. Nojiri, O. Obregon, S. D. Odintsov and K. E. Osetrin, Phys. Lett. B 449 (1999) 173-179

work page 1999

[58] [58]

Nojiri, O

S. Nojiri, O. Obregon, S. D. Odintsov and K. E. Osetrin, Phys. Lett. B 458 (1999) 19-28

work page 1999

[59] [59]

F. S. N. Lobo and M. A. Oliveira, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 104012

work page 2009

[60] [60]

Saiedi and B N

H. Saiedi and B N. Esfahani, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 26 (2011) 1211

work page 2011

[61] [61]

Thermodynamics of Evolving Lorentzian Wormholes at Apparent Horizon in $f(R)$ Theory of Gravity

H. Saiedi, arXiv:1409.2179v1 [gr-qc] (2014)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[62] [62]

Cosmological wormholes in $f(R)$ theories of gravity

S. Bahamonde, M. Jamil, P. Pavlovic and M. Sossich, arXiv:1606.05295v2 [gr-qc] (2016)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[63] [63]

P. K. F. Kuhﬁttig, Ind. J. Phys. 92 (2018) 1207

work page 2018

[64] [64]

Godani and G

N. Godani and G. C. Samanta, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 28 (2018) 1950039

work page 2018

[65] [65]

G. C. Samanta, N. Godani and K. Bamba, arXiv:1811.06834v1 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv

[66] [66]

Nojiri and S

S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Gen. Rel. Grav. 36 (2004) 17651780

work page 2004

[67] [67]

Nojiri and S

S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rep. 505 (2011) 59144

work page 2011

[68] [68]

Inflation constraints for classes of f(R) models

J. Ntahompagaze, J. D. Mbarubucyeye, S. Sahlu and A. Abebe, arXiv:1810.03291v2 [gr-qc] (2018). 14

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018