pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.08720 · v1 · pith:T7WKFZSSnew · submitted 2019-07-19 · 🧮 math.OC · cs.SY· eess.SY

Multiway k-Cut in Static and Dynamic Graphs: A Maximum Entropy Principle Approach

Mayank Baranwal , Amber Srivastava , Srinivasa Salapaka This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 18:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC cs.SYeess.SY
keywords multiway k-cutmaximum entropy principlegraph partitioningdynamic graphscontrol Lyapunov functiondigraphsNP-hard optimizationiterative algorithm
0
0 comments X

The pith

A maximum entropy relaxation of the multiway k-cut cost yields a convergent iterative algorithm for static graphs and a Lyapunov function for controlling dynamic graphs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a maximum entropy principle approach to the minimum multiway k-cut problem on directed graphs. This NP-hard task requires partitioning nodes into k subsets each containing one given terminal while minimizing the sum of crossing edge weights. For fixed graphs an iterative method on a relaxed version of the cost is proven to reach a local minimum with complexity scaling as k times iterations times N cubed. In the time-varying case the relaxed cost is used as a control Lyapunov function to derive inputs that drive the edge weights so the cut value stays small. The method is demonstrated on image segmentation and evolving graph examples.

Core claim

The maximum-entropy relaxation of the multiway k-cut value serves as a tractable surrogate whose local minimization produces partitions with low true cut value, and which can be employed as a control Lyapunov function to design dynamics for controllable edges that keep the cut small over time.

What carries the argument

The relaxed multiway k-cut cost function derived from the maximum entropy principle, used both for iterative minimization and as a Lyapunov function.

If this is right

  • The iterative algorithm converges to a local minimum of the relaxed cost for static graphs.
  • The algorithm has time complexity O(k I N^3) where N is the number of vertices.
  • Control laws can be designed so that the multiway k-cut value remains small or decreases as the graph evolves.
  • The approach applies to problems such as interactive foreground-background segmentation.
  • Time-varying partitions can be determined that track the minimum cut under dynamics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same relaxation might extend to other graph partitioning problems beyond k-cut.
  • Convergence guarantees could be strengthened by analyzing the basin of attraction for different initial conditions.
  • Implementation on very large graphs may require approximation techniques for the matrix operations inside each iteration.
  • Connections to spectral methods for graph cuts could be explored by examining the eigenstructure of the relaxed cost.

Load-bearing premise

The relaxed cost obtained from the maximum entropy principle is close enough to the true multiway k-cut value that its local minima correspond to useful or near-optimal partitions.

What would settle it

On small graphs with known optimal k-cut values, run the algorithm from multiple starts and check whether the achieved true cut value is consistently close to the optimum.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.08720 by Amber Srivastava, Mayank Baranwal, Srinivasa Salapaka.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Schematic of a minimum multiway k-cut problem with k = 3 and S = {s1,s2,s3}. Here A1,A2 and A3 are the disconnected components. (b) Illustrative example of a multiway 3-cut problem with S = {1,6,10} and unit edge-weights described in Sec. VI. components {Aj : Aj ⊂ V,1 ≤ j ≤ 3}, such that sj ∈ Aj for all j, and the total cut size, 1 2 ∑ 3 j=1w(Aj ,A¯ j) is minimized. While the problem of computing a min… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Phase Transition in Algorithm 1 applied to problem stated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Illustrative example of minimum 3-cut problem. The columns indicate the association matrices p(j|i) at different β values. The ‘bold’ numbers indicate the associations of terminals, i.e., p(j = 1|i = 1) = 1, p(j = 2|i = 6) = 1 and p(j = 3|i = 10) = 1. As the algorithm progresses, the associations of remaining nodes harden, thereby resulting in optimal cut. β, the algorithm results in hardened probabilities… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Example of a 22 nodes non-planar graph with 6 terminals, S = {1,4,8,11,15,19}. The proposed algorithm results in an optimal cut. (b) An 8 node graph with multiple permissible optimal 4-cuts. (c) Final association matrix for the 4-cut problem shown in (b) part. (d) Toy-example with 2k = 6 vertices where k of the vertices form a cycle where each edge weight is equal to 1, and each other vertex is connect… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Illustration of the proposed multiway k-cut approach to background-foreground segmentation. Here each pixel in the bounding box represents a node. The terminal nodes (corresponding to foreground and background) are interactively provided by the user once, and the algorithm successively evaluates minimum st￾cut to refine foreground-background segmentation. Edge-weights are obtained as functions of pixels’ R… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Illustration of the proposed approach for time varying minimum multiway 2-cut in an example graph with 4 nodes, where s1 = 2 and s2 = 4. The four plots indicate different stages of the evolution of edge-weights. Note that the edge (1,2) is uncontrollable and evolves under its natural dynamics. On the other hand, other edges can be controlled to result in minimum cut values at each instant without having to… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This work presents a maximum entropy principle based algorithm for solving minimum multiway $k$-cut problem defined over static and dynamic {\em digraphs}. A multiway $k$-cut problem requires partitioning the set of nodes in a graph into $k$ subsets, such that each subset contains one prespecified node, and the corresponding total cut weight is minimized. These problems arise in many applications and are computationally complex (NP-hard). In the static setting this article presents an approach that uses a relaxed multiway $k$-cut cost function; we show that the resulting algorithm converges to a local minimum. This iterative algorithm is designed to avoid poor local minima with its run-time complexity as $\sim O(kIN^3)$, where $N$ is the number of vertices and $I$ is the number of iterations. In the dynamic setting, the edge-weight matrix has an associated dynamics with some of the edges in the graph capable of being influenced by an external input. The objective is to design the dynamics of the controllable edges so that multiway $k$-cut value remains small (or decreases) as the graph evolves under the dynamics. Also it is required to determine the time-varying partition that defines the minimum multiway $k$-cut value. Our approach is to choose a relaxation of multiway $k$-cut value, derived using maximum entropy principle, and treat it as a control Lyapunov function to design control laws that affect the weight dynamics. Simulations on practical examples of interactive foreground-background segmentation, minimum multiway $k$-cut optimization for non-planar graphs and dynamically evolving graphs that demonstrate the efficacy of the algorithm, are presented.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a maximum-entropy relaxation of the multiway k-cut objective for both static and dynamic digraphs. In the static case an iterative algorithm is claimed to converge to a local minimum of the relaxation with runtime O(k I N^3). In the dynamic case the same relaxation is treated as a control Lyapunov function whose decrease is enforced by admissible controls on edge weights, while a time-varying partition is recovered. Simulations on segmentation and evolving graphs are presented to illustrate performance.

Significance. If the convergence claim and the Lyapunov construction are rigorously established and the relaxation is shown to be a faithful surrogate for the combinatorial cut value, the work would supply a practical heuristic for an NP-hard partitioning task together with a control-theoretic handle on time-varying instances. The simulations already indicate applicability to foreground-background segmentation and non-planar graphs; a verified link between the relaxed objective and the true cut would strengthen the contribution.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (static setting): the statement that 'the resulting algorithm converges to a local minimum' is presented without a derivation, Lyapunov-function argument, or even a sketch of the fixed-point analysis. Because local-minimization of the relaxation is the sole justification offered for the static algorithm, this omission is load-bearing for the central claim.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (dynamic setting): the claim that the max-entropy relaxation can be used as a control Lyapunov function to design admissible controls that keep the multiway k-cut value small requires (i) a decrease condition on the relaxation and (ii) a relation between the relaxed value and the true combinatorial cut under time-varying partitions. Neither the decrease condition nor any bounding argument is supplied.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract and introduction: the maximum-entropy relaxation is asserted to be a 'sufficiently faithful surrogate' for the NP-hard multiway k-cut value, yet no approximation ratio, monotonicity property, or explicit comparison between relaxed and combinatorial objectives is referenced. This unverified link underpins both the local-minimization guarantee and the CLF-based control design.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The runtime complexity is stated as ∼O(k I N^3) without clarifying whether the cubic term arises from matrix inversion, eigenvalue computation, or another primitive; a brief complexity breakdown would aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and valuable suggestions. We address the major comments point-by-point below, agreeing to incorporate additional analysis and clarifications in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (static setting): the statement that 'the resulting algorithm converges to a local minimum' is presented without a derivation, Lyapunov-function argument, or even a sketch of the fixed-point analysis. Because local-minimization of the relaxation is the sole justification offered for the static algorithm, this omission is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: The convergence to a local minimum is shown via fixed-point analysis of the iterative updates derived from the maximum-entropy relaxation in the main body of the paper. We will revise the abstract to include a brief sketch of this analysis to make the justification self-contained. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (dynamic setting): the claim that the max-entropy relaxation can be used as a control Lyapunov function to design admissible controls that keep the multiway k-cut value small requires (i) a decrease condition on the relaxation and (ii) a relation between the relaxed value and the true combinatorial cut under time-varying partitions. Neither the decrease condition nor any bounding argument is supplied.

    Authors: In the dynamic case, the control laws are designed such that the time derivative of the relaxed objective is negative, ensuring decrease. We will add an explicit proposition stating the decrease condition and a discussion on how the relaxed value relates to the combinatorial cut for the recovered partitions. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and introduction: the maximum-entropy relaxation is asserted to be a 'sufficiently faithful surrogate' for the NP-hard multiway k-cut value, yet no approximation ratio, monotonicity property, or explicit comparison between relaxed and combinatorial objectives is referenced. This unverified link underpins both the local-minimization guarantee and the CLF-based control design.

    Authors: The maximum entropy relaxation provides a differentiable surrogate that preserves the structure of the cut objective. While no general approximation ratio is derived (consistent with the NP-hardness), we will include numerical comparisons between the relaxed and true objectives on benchmark instances and clarify the surrogate property in the revised version. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation of relaxation and convergence claims are independent of inputs

full rationale

The abstract describes deriving a max-entropy relaxation of the multiway k-cut objective and proving local-min convergence of the resulting iterative algorithm (static case) plus its use as a CLF for weight dynamics (dynamic case). No equations, parameter fits, or self-citations are exhibited that would make any claimed prediction or uniqueness reduce by construction to the input data or prior author work. The central modeling choice (max-entropy relaxation) is presented as a standard principle applied to the combinatorial objective rather than a redefinition or fitted surrogate whose output is forced to match its inputs. The link between relaxed and true cut values is an external modeling assumption, not a definitional loop inside the derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; the paper invokes the maximum-entropy principle to obtain a relaxation but does not list explicit free parameters, background axioms, or new entities. No independent evidence for any postulated objects is supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5844 in / 1203 out tokens · 23958 ms · 2026-05-24T18:49:21.294705+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Multiway cut,

    S. Lowen, “Multiway cut,” 2011

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    Multiprocessor scheduling with the aid of network flow algorithms,

    H. S. Stone, “Multiprocessor scheduling with the aid of network flow algorithms,” IEEE transactions on Software Engineering , no. 1, pp. 85–93, 1977

    work page 1977

  3. [3]

    On weighted multiway cuts in trees,

    P. L. Erd ˝os and L. A. Sz ´ekely, “On weighted multiway cuts in trees,” Mathematical programming, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 93–105, 1994

    work page 1994

  4. [4]

    The complexity of multiterminal cuts,

    E. Dahlhaus, D. S. Johnson, C. H. Papadimitriou, P. D. Seymour, and M. Yannakakis, “The complexity of multiterminal cuts,” SIAM Journal on Computing, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 864–894, 1994

    work page 1994

  5. [5]

    A tight lower bound for planar multiway cut with fixed number of terminals,

    D. Marx, “A tight lower bound for planar multiway cut with fixed number of terminals,” in International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming. Springer, 2012, pp. 677–688

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Time- varying graphs and dynamic networks,

    A. Casteigts, P. Flocchini, W. Quattrociocchi, and N. Santoro, “Time- varying graphs and dynamic networks,” International Journal of Parallel, Emergent and Distributed Systems , vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 387– 408, 2012

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Review on graph clustering and subgraph similarity based analysis of neurological disorders,

    J. Thomas, D. Seo, and L. Sael, “Review on graph clustering and subgraph similarity based analysis of neurological disorders,” Inter- national journal of molecular sciences , vol. 17, no. 6, p. 862, 2016

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Information theory and statistical mechanics,

    E. T. Jaynes, “Information theory and statistical mechanics,” Physical review, vol. 106, no. 4, p. 620, 1957

    work page 1957

  9. [9]

    Deterministic annealing for clustering, compression, classi- fication, regression, and related optimization problems,

    K. Rose, “Deterministic annealing for clustering, compression, classi- fication, regression, and related optimization problems,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 2210–2239, 1998

    work page 1998

  10. [10]

    Deterministic annealing for multiple- instance learning

    P. V . Gehler and O. Chapelle, “Deterministic annealing for multiple- instance learning.” in AIStats, 2007, pp. 123–130

    work page 2007

  11. [11]

    An adaptive determinis- tic annealing approach for medical image segmentation,

    S. Mitra, R. Castellanos, and S. Joshi, “An adaptive determinis- tic annealing approach for medical image segmentation,” in Fuzzy Information Processing Society, 2000. NAFIPS. 19th International Conference of the North American . IEEE, 2000, pp. 82–84

    work page 2000

  12. [12]

    Aggregation of graph models and markov chains by deterministic annealing,

    Y . Xu, S. M. Salapaka, and C. L. Beck, “Aggregation of graph models and markov chains by deterministic annealing,” Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on , vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 2807–2812, 2014

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    Design of robust hmm speech recog- nizers using deterministic annealing,

    A. Rao, K. Rose, and A. Gersho, “Design of robust hmm speech recog- nizers using deterministic annealing,” inAutomatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, 1997. Proceedings., 1997 IEEE Workshop on . IEEE, 1997, pp. 466–473

    work page 1997

  14. [14]

    Multiple traveling salesmen and related problems: A maximum-entropy principle based approach,

    M. Baranwal, B. Roehl, and S. M. Salapaka, “Multiple traveling salesmen and related problems: A maximum-entropy principle based approach,” in 2017 American Control Conference (ACC). IEEE, 2017, pp. 3944–3949

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Clustering and coverage control for systems with acceleration-driven dynamics,

    Y . Xu, S. M. Salapaka, and C. L. Beck, “Clustering and coverage control for systems with acceleration-driven dynamics,” Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on , vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1342–1347, 2014

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    An improved approximation algorithm for multiway cut,

    G. C ˘alinescu, H. Karloff, and Y . Rabani, “An improved approximation algorithm for multiway cut,” in Proceedings of the thirtieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing . ACM, 1998, pp. 48–52

    work page 1998

  17. [17]

    A 2-approximation algorithm for the directed multiway cut problem,

    J. Naor and L. Zosin, “A 2-approximation algorithm for the directed multiway cut problem,” SIAM Journal on Computing , vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 477–482, 2001

    work page 2001

  18. [18]

    Uber die abgrenzung der eigenwerte einer matrix,

    S. A. Gershgorin, “Uber die abgrenzung der eigenwerte einer matrix,” Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Mathematical series, no. 6, pp. 749–754, 1931

    work page 1931

  19. [19]

    Sepulchre, M

    R. Sepulchre, M. Jankovic, and P. V . Kokotovic, Constructive nonlin- ear control. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    A lyapunov-like characterization of asymptotic control- lability,

    E. D. Sontag, “A lyapunov-like characterization of asymptotic control- lability,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization , vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 462–471, 1983

    work page 1983

  21. [21]

    A universal construction of artstein’s theorem on nonlinear stabilization,

    ——, “A universal construction of artstein’s theorem on nonlinear stabilization,” Systems & control letters , vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 117–123, 1989

    work page 1989

  22. [22]

    Grabcut: Interactive fore- ground extraction using iterated graph cuts,

    C. Rother, V . Kolmogorov, and A. Blake, “Grabcut: Interactive fore- ground extraction using iterated graph cuts,” in ACM transactions on graphics (TOG), vol. 23, no. 3. ACM, 2004, pp. 309–314

    work page 2004

  23. [23]

    Note on the derivatives with respect to a parameter of the solutions of a system of differential equations,

    T. H. Gronwall, “Note on the derivatives with respect to a parameter of the solutions of a system of differential equations,” Annals of Mathematics, pp. 292–296, 1919

    work page 1919