pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.08797 · v1 · pith:Q5L56PFLnew · submitted 2019-07-20 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Circularly Symmetric Light Waves: An Overview

Andrea Cagliero This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 18:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords orbital angular momentumvortex beamsHelmholtz equationrotation groupparaxial beamsvector vortex waveslight propagationangular momentum operators
0
0 comments X

The pith

An operator approach based on the two-dimensional rotation group classifies all families of vortex solutions to the homogeneous Helmholtz equation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a unified framework for examining every family of vortex solutions to the homogeneous Helmholtz equation. It treats both scalar and vector cases by connecting the solutions directly to the symmetries of the two-dimensional rotation group. The work also details how this classification governs the propagation behavior of common paraxial orbital angular momentum beams. A reader would find value in the promise of a single method that generates and organizes these beams without separate case-by-case derivations.

Core claim

All possible families of vortex solutions to the homogeneous Helmholtz equation, in both scalar and vector forms, can be generated and analyzed through an operator approach that makes explicit their connection to the two-dimensional rotation group; this same approach yields the propagation properties of the most studied paraxial OAM beams.

What carries the argument

The operator approach tied to the two-dimensional rotation group, which produces the solutions as eigenfunctions of the angular momentum operator and organizes their scalar and vector families.

If this is right

  • Every scalar and vector vortex solution belongs to a family generated by the rotation-group operators.
  • Propagation characteristics of paraxial OAM beams follow directly from the same group-theoretic construction.
  • The scalar and vector cases share an intimate structural link through the angular-momentum operators.
  • The framework applies to the full homogeneous Helmholtz equation, not only its paraxial limit.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Design of new beams could proceed by choosing operators rather than solving the wave equation from scratch.
  • Similar symmetry methods might classify vortex solutions in other linear wave equations that share rotational invariance.
  • Extensions to inhomogeneous or bounded media would require additional operators beyond the free-space rotation group.

Load-bearing premise

Operators from the two-dimensional rotation group alone suffice to generate and classify every vortex solution to the homogeneous Helmholtz equation.

What would settle it

A concrete vortex solution to the homogeneous Helmholtz equation whose form or propagation cannot be obtained from any operator constructed from the two-dimensional rotation group.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.08797 by Andrea Cagliero.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: BB intensity (upper row) and phase (lower row) transverse profiles (y-coordinate versus x-coordinate) for kρ = k/√ 2. Scalar modes of the form: Ψ B m (ρ, ϕ, z, t; kρ) = C B mJ|m| (kρρ) Φm (ϕ) exp (−ikzz + iωt), (10) where C B m is a suitable dimensional constant, are known as Bessel beams (BBs) and represent a complete set of orthogonal solutions to (3). The transverse intensity and phase profiles of a rep… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Propagation of the fundamental Gaussian wave ψ LG 00 : longitudinal intensity profile with some beam parameters. The equation is easily solved and gives: Θ (ζ) = − (2p + |m| + 1) arctan (ζ). (31) Hence, expression (29) becomes: 2r 2LG00  2r 2  +  |m| + 1 − 2r 2  LG0  2r 2  + pLG  2r 2  , (32) whose regular solution is the generalized Laguerre polynomial L |m| p [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p0… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: LG beam intensity (upper row) and phase (lower row) transverse profiles (y￾coordinate versus x-coordinate) for p = 0. The radius of the primary intensity maximum evolves with z according to the law: ρ LG max (z) = ρ LG max,0 s 1 +  z zR 2 , (34) where ρ LG max,0 = ρ LG max (0) vanishes for m = 0. At large distances, for m 6= 0, we infer ρ LG max (z) ∝ z. By replacing ρ with expression (34) in the square … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Evolution of the principal intensity maximum of some LG beams as a function of the propagation distance for w0 = λ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Evolution of the integral of the intensity of some LG beams over a centered circular region with radius w0 as a function of z, for w0 = λ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: HyG beam intensity (upper row) and phase (lower row) transverse profiles (y￾coordinate versus x-coordinate) for γ = 1. Let us suppose the function uHG to be factorized as: uHG (r, ζ) ∝ r |m|ZHG (ζ) HG  r 2  , (45) then (44) reduces to: r 2HG00 + h (|m| + 1) − r 2 i HG0 − " |m| + 1 2 + i µ 2 ZHG dZHG dζ # HG = 0. (46) Following the usual procedure, it is required that: i µ 2 (ζ) ZHG (ζ) dZHG (ζ) dζ = − η … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison between the power profiles (per unit square meter) of a LG beam and of a HyGG-II beam evaluated in y = 0, for w0 = λ. Despite their name, resembling the previous family, the HyGG-II beams show significant differences with respect to the other known solutions. First, the radius of their primary intensity maximum increases with z according to two possible asymptotic behaviors, depending on the cho… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Evolution of the radial coordinate of the principal intensity maximum of some HyGG￾II beams as a function of z, for w0 = λ. Note that for − |m| < η < 0 unstable maxima of the intensity profile with different evolution in z are competing in a certain range of the propagation coordinate; since the plot only captures the principal maximum at each z, this results in a stair-like behavior [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figu… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Evolution of the integral of the intensity of some HyGG-II beams over a centered circular region with radius w0 as a function of z, for w0 = λ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of the longitudinal intensity profiles (x-coordinate versus z-coordinate) of some paraxial beams for w0 = λ. the whole procedure presented in Section 3 should be repeated starting from the assumption ψ (ρ, ϕ, z) = f (ρ, ϕ, z) eikz . The intensity distribution of the BG beams is strongly related to the value of the transverse momentum kρ as well as to the beam waist w0 of the Gaussian envelope [… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Norm and polarization plots (y-coordinate versus x-coordinate) of the function Mm defined in (75) for kρ = k/√ 2. null is replaced by a maximum. Both deviations are attributable to the mixing of spatial and polarization contributions, which also affects all the other modes, as evidenced by the circumstance that additional factors e±iϕ appear once (75) is rewritten in terms of the Cartesian unit vectors. I… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Norm and polarization plots (y-coordinate versus x-coordinate) of the electric field E in (81) for some nonparaxial (upper row) and paraxial (lower row) solutions with m = 1. For β = ±iα, equation (81) leads back to (79). Any other choice of the polarization parameters α and β in (81) does not give rise to an eigenvector of the Jˆ z operator, as evidenced by the fact that the circular symmetry of both the… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Orbital Angular Momentum (OAM) waves were first recognized as those specific vortex solutions of the paraxial Helmholtz equation for which the orbital contribution to the total angular momentum of the beam yields an integer multiple of $\hbar$ along the propagation direction. However, this class of solutions can be generalized to include more sophisticated vector vortex waves with coupled polarization and spatial complexity, that are eigenfunctions of the third component of the angular momentum operator. In this work, a rigorous framework is proposed for the analysis of all the possible families of vortex solutions to the homogeneous Helmholtz equation. Both the scalar and vector cases are studied in depth, making use of an operator approach which emphasizes their intimate connection with the two-dimensional rotation group. Furthermore, a special focus is given to the characterization of the propagation properties of the most popular families of paraxial OAM beams.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a rigorous framework for classifying all families of vortex solutions (scalar and vector) to the homogeneous Helmholtz equation via an operator approach tied to the two-dimensional rotation group SO(2), with additional focus on the propagation properties of common paraxial OAM beams such as those generalizing Bessel and Laguerre-Gaussian modes.

Significance. If the operator method yields a complete, symmetry-based taxonomy that recovers known families without ad-hoc assumptions and clarifies their angular-momentum eigenfunction properties, the work would offer a useful unifying perspective for structured-light research, though its novelty would rest on the depth of synthesis rather than new derivations.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states that the framework is 'rigorous' and studies cases 'in depth,' yet the provided text contains no explicit derivations, operator definitions, or validation against known solutions; if the full manuscript similarly lacks these, the central claim of a new framework requires explicit equations in §2 or §3 to be load-bearing.
  2. Clarify the precise scope: the abstract limits the treatment to the homogeneous Helmholtz equation, but the title refers to 'Circularly Symmetric Light Waves' more broadly; add a sentence in the introduction distinguishing free-space homogeneous cases from guided or inhomogeneous media.
  3. Figure captions and axis labels for any propagation plots should explicitly state the normalization and the value of the azimuthal index m used, to allow direct comparison with standard Bessel or LG literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, the recognition of its unifying perspective on vortex solutions via the SO(2) operator approach, and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained via standard group theory

full rationale

The paper's framework applies the standard operator method linking homogeneous Helmholtz solutions to irreducible representations of the SO(2) rotation group, yielding the usual azimuthal indices and known families (Bessel, Laguerre-Gaussian, etc.). This is an external mathematical fact, not derived from the paper's own fitted data or prior self-citations. No self-definitional steps, no parameters fitted to a subset then relabeled as predictions, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' own work appear in the described derivation chain. The approach is scoped to homogeneous media and circular symmetry, where the symmetry group directly produces the integer labels without circular reduction to the target results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only access prevents identification of specific free parameters or invented entities. The work rests on standard domain assumptions in wave optics.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Vortex solutions are eigenfunctions of the angular momentum operator component along propagation.
    Invoked in the abstract as the basis for generalizing OAM waves.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5659 in / 1052 out tokens · 22658 ms · 2026-05-24T18:47:31.219819+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

143 extracted references · 143 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Circularly Symmetric Light Waves: An Overview

    Introduction Electromagnetic waves carry energy and both linear and angular momenta. Whereas a contribution to the total angular momentum is realized by the spin of the photon, the fundamental physical quantity associated with polarization, an orbital angular momentum (OAM) component can also be present. Such contribution is often said to be “quasi-intrin...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  2. [2]

    non-diffracting

    Vortex solutions of the scalar wave equation As it is known in group theory, separable coordinate systems for second-order linear partial differential equations can be characterized in terms of sets of operators in the algebra relative to the underlying continuous symmetry group [73]. In this framework, the separated solutions of the considered equations a...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Paraxial OAM waves In the event that the angle between the wavevector k and the propagation direction ( z-axis) is small and assuming a beam amplitude of the form ψ (ρ, ϕ, z) = f (ρ, ϕ, z) exp (−ikz), where f (ρ, ϕ, z) represents a slowly varying function of the z-coordinate, such that: ⏐⏐⏐⏐⏐ ∂2f (ρ, ϕ, z) ∂z 2 ⏐⏐⏐⏐⏐≪ k ⏐⏐⏐⏐ ∂f (ρ, ϕ, z) ∂z ⏐⏐⏐⏐ ; ⏐⏐⏐⏐⏐ ∂...

    work page

  4. [4]

    and leads to: f LG pm (ρ, ϕ, z) = CLG pm w (z)  ρ w (z) |m| L|m| p ) 2ρ2 w2 (z) [ exp (imϕ) × exp ) )− ρ2 w2 0 ( 1− i z zR )− iΘ ( z zR )( [ . (33) In expression (33), the definition w (z) = w0 µ (z/zR) has been introduced, w0 corresponds to the waist of the Gaussian beam, zR is the Rayleigh distance (see Figure 2) and Θ ( ζ) the Gouy phase [100]. The co...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Vortex solutions of the vector wave equation As shown in the two previous sections, exact and paraxial solutions of the scalar wave equation which are eigenfunctions of the ˆJz operator can be easily derived by means of standard mathematical techniques; indeed, such scalar OAM solutions have been deeply explored in the literature. However, an electromagne...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Therefore, the transformation of ψ under an infinitesimal rotation about the z-axis leads back to the action of the ˆJz operator on each basis function

    A general vector solution of (67) can be constructed from {gm} via the superposition: ψ = i ω  m (amMm + bmNm + cmLm) , (72) where am, bm and cm represent suitable expansion coefficients and the vector fields in the set {Mm, Nm, Lm} are provided by (69) with g = gm. Therefore, the transformation of ψ under an infinitesimal rotation about the z-axis leads bac...

    work page

  7. [7]

    helico-polar

    Conclusions In this work, an in-depth overview on the exact and paraxial vortex solutions of the homogeneous wave equation has been presented. These solutions have been interpreted as eigenstates of the ˆJz operator, leading to a mixture of polarization and spatial modes in the case of a general vector vortex wave. Whereas a scalar approach is often conve...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Zambrini R and Barnett S M 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(11) 113901 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.96.113901

    work page 2006

  9. [9]

    O’Neil A T, MacVicar I, Allen L and Padgett M J 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(5) 053601 URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.053601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.053601 2002

  10. [10]

    Allen L, Beijersbergen M W, Spreeuw R J C and Woerdman J P 1992 Phys. Rev. A 45(11) 8185–8189 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.45.8185

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.45.8185 1992

  11. [11]

    Jauch J M and Rohrlich F 1976 The Theory of Photons and Electrons 2nd ed (Springer-Verlag, Berlin)

    work page 1976

  12. [12]

    Simmons J W and Guttmann M J 1970 States, Waves and Photons (Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Inc., Reading, Massachusetts)

    work page 1970

  13. [14]

    Enk S V and Nienhuis G 1994 Journal of Modern Optics 41 963–977 (Preprint https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09500349414550911) URL https://doi.org/10.1080/09500349414550911

    work page doi:10.1080/09500349414550911 1994

  14. [15]

    Barnett S M, Allen L, Cameron R P, Gilson C R, Padgett M J, Speirits F C and Yao A M 2016 Journal of Optics 18 064004 URL http://stacks.iop.org/2040-8986/18/i=6/a=064004

    work page 2016

  15. [16]

    Beth R A 1936 Phys. Rev. 50(2) 115–125 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.50.115

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.50.115 1936

  16. [17]

    Friese M E J, Enger J, Rubinsztein-Dunlop H and Heckenberg N R 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54(2) 1593–1596 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.54.1593

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.54.1593 1996

  17. [18]

    Simpson N B, Dholakia K, Allen L and Padgett M J 1997 Opt. Lett. 22 52–54 URL http://ol.osa.org/ abstract.cfm?URI=ol-22-1-52

    work page 1997

  18. [19]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics 132(21), 214102 (2010)

    Galajda P and Ormos P 2001 Applied Physics Letters 78 249–251 (Preprint https://doi.org/10.1063/1. 1339258) URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1339258

    work page doi:10.1063/1 2001

  19. [20]

    Grier D G 2003 Nature 424 810–816 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature01935

    work page doi:10.1038/nature01935 2003

  20. [21]

    Padgett M and Bowman R 2011 Nature Photonics 5 343–348 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphoton. 2011.81

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton 2011

  21. [22]

    Paterson L, MacDonald M P, Arlt J, Sibbett W, Bryant P E and Dholakia K 2001 Science 292 912–914

    work page 2001

  22. [23]

    Jeffries G D M, Edgar J S, Zhao Y, Shelby J P, Fong C and Chiu D T 2007 Nano Letters 7 415–420 pMID: 17298009 (Preprint https://doi.org/10.1021/nl0626784) URL https://doi.org/10.1021/nl0626784

    work page doi:10.1021/nl0626784 2007

  23. [24]

    Lorenz R M, Edgar J S, Jeffries G D M and Chiu D T 2006 Analytical Chemistry 78 6433–6439 pMID: 16970318 (Preprint https://doi.org/10.1021/ac060748l) URL https://doi.org/10.1021/ac060748l

    work page doi:10.1021/ac060748l 2006

  24. [25]

    Andersen M F, Ryu C, Clad´ e P, Natarajan V, Vaziri A, Helmerson K and Phillips W D 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97(17) 170406 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.170406

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.170406 2006

  25. [26]

    Tabosa J W R and Petrov D V 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 83(24) 4967–4970 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4967

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.4967 1999

  26. [27]

    Wright K C, Leslie L S and Bigelow N P 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77(4) 041601 URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.77.041601

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.77.041601 2008

  27. [28]

    Express 14 3792–3805 URL http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-14-9-3792

    Bernet S, Jesacher A, F¨ urhapter S, Maurer C and Ritsch-Marte M 2006 Opt. Express 14 3792–3805 URL http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-14-9-3792

    work page 2006

  28. [29]

    F¨ urhapter S, Jesacher A, Bernet S and Ritsch-Marte M 2005 Opt. Lett. 30 1953–1955 URL http: //ol.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-30-15-1953

    work page 2005

  29. [30]

    1038/srep15826

    Wang J, Zhang W, Qi Q, Zheng S and Chen L 2015 Scientific Reports 5 URL http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/srep15826

    work page 2015

  30. [31]

    Dada A C, Leach J, Buller G S, Padgett M J and Andersson E 2011 Nature Physics 7 677–680 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys1996

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys1996 2011

  31. [32]

    Fickler R, Lapkiewicz R, Plick W N, Krenn M, Schaeff C, Ramelow S and Zeilinger A 2012 Science 338 640–643

    work page 2012

  32. [33]

    Mair A, Vaziri A, Weihs G and Zeilinger A 2001 Nature 412 313–316 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ 35085529

    work page 2001

  33. [34]

    1038/nphys607

    Molina-Terriza G, Torres J P and Torner L 2007 Nature Physics 3 305–310 URL http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/nphys607

    work page 2007

  34. [35]

    Vaziri A, Weihs G and Zeilinger A 2002 Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics 4 S47 URL http://stacks.iop.org/1464-4266/4/i=2/a=367

    work page 2002

  35. [36]

    Bovino F A, Braccini M, Giardina M and Sibilia C 2011 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 28 2806–2811 URL http://josab.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI=josab-28-11-2806

    work page 2011

  36. [37]

    Dholakia K, Simpson N B, Padgett M J and Allen L 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54(5) R3742–R3745 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.54.R3742

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.54.r3742 1996

  37. [38]

    Fang X, Wei D, Liu D, Zhong W, Ni R, Chen Z, Hu X, Zhang Y, Zhu S N and Xiao M 2015 Applied Physics Letters 107 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4934488

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4934488 2015

  38. [39]

    Bigelow M S, Zerom P and Boyd R W 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92(8) 083902 URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.083902

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.083902 2004

  39. [40]

    Express 12 817–822 URL http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-12-5-817

    Ferrando A, Zacar´ es M, de C´ ordoba P F, Binosi D and Monsoriu J A 2004Opt. Express 12 817–822 URL http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-12-5-817

    work page

  40. [41]

    Firth W J and Skryabin D V 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79(13) 2450–2453 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2450

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.2450 1997

  41. [42]

    Minardi S, Molina-Terriza G, Trapani P D, Torres J P and Torner L 2001 Opt. Lett. 26 1004–1006 URL http://ol.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-26-13-1004

    work page 2001

  42. [43]

    Suzuki ,\ http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037596019090962N journal journal Physics Letters A \ volume 146 ,\ pages 319 ( year 1990 ) NoStop

    Kruglov V and Vlasov R 1985 Physics Letters A 111 401 – 404 ISSN 0375-9601 URL http://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0375960185904815

    work page arXiv 1985

  43. [44]

    Law C T and Swartzlander G A 1993 Opt. Lett. 18 586–588 URL http://ol.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI= ol-18-8-586

    work page 1993

  44. [45]

    Swartzlander G A and Law C T 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69(17) 2503–2506 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2503

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2503 1992

  45. [46]

    Jack B, Leach J, Romero J, Franke-Arnold S, Ritsch-Marte M, Barnett S M and Padgett M J 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103(8) 083602 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.083602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.083602 2009

  46. [47]

    Tamburini F, Anzolin G, Umbriaco G, Bianchini A and Barbieri C 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97(16) 163903 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.163903

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.163903 2006

  47. [48]

    Berkhout G C G and Beijersbergen M W 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101(10) 100801 URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.100801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.100801 2008

  48. [49]

    Elias II N M 2008 Astronomy and Astrophysics 492 883–922

    work page 2008

  49. [50]

    Foo G, Palacios D M and Swartzlander G A 2005 Opt. Lett. 30 3308–3310 URL http://ol.osa.org/ abstract.cfm?URI=ol-30-24-3308

    work page 2005

  50. [51]

    Harwit M 2003 The Astrophysical Journal 597 1266 URL http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/597/i=2/ a=1266

    work page 2003

  51. [52]

    Tamburini F, Thid´ e B, Molina-Terriza G and Anzolin G 2011 Nature Physics 7 195–197 URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys1907

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys1907 2011

  52. [53]

    Allen L, Barnett S M and Padgett M J 2003 Optical Angular Momentum (Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol)

    work page 2003

  53. [54]

    Andrews D L 2008 Structured Light and Its Applications: An Introduction to Phase-Structured Beams and Nanoscale Optical Forces (Academic Press, Elsevier, USA)

    work page 2008

  54. [55]

    Andrews D L and Babiker M 2013 The Angular Momentum of Light (Cambridge University Press)

    work page 2013

  55. [56]

    Rubinsztein-Dunlop H, Forbes A, Berry M V, Dennis M R, Andrews D L, Mansuripur M, Denz C, Alpmann C, Banzer P, Bauer T, Karimi E, Marrucci L, Padgett M, Ritsch-Marte M, Litchinitser N M, Bigelow N P, Rosales-Guzm´ an C, Belmonte A, Torres J P, Neely T W, Baker M, Gordon R, Stilgoe A B, Romero J, White A G, Fickler R, Willner A E, Xie G, McMorran B and Wei...

    work page 2017

  56. [57]

    KGaA, Weinheim, Germany)

    Torres J P and Torner L 2011 Twisted Photons (WILEY-VCH Verlag and Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany)

    work page 2011

  57. [58]

    Yao A M and Padgett M J 2011 Adv. Opt. Photon. 3 161–204 URL http://aop.osa.org/abstract.cfm? URI=aop-3-2-161

    work page 2011

  58. [59]

    Express 12 5448–5456 URL http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-12-22-5448

    Gibson G, Courtial J, Padgett M J, Vasnetsov M, Pas’ko V, Barnett S M and Franke-Arnold S 2004 Opt. Express 12 5448–5456 URL http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-12-22-5448

    work page 2004

  59. [60]

    Franke-Arnold S, Barnett S M, Yao E, Leach J, Courtial J and Padgett M 2004 New Journal of Physics 6 103 URL http://stacks.iop.org/1367-2630/6/i=1/a=103

    work page 2004

  60. [61]

    Anguita J A, Neifeld M A and Vasic B V 2008Appl. Opt. 47 2414–2429 URL http://ao.osa.org/abstract. cfm?URI=ao-47-13-2414

    work page

  61. [62]

    Bozinovic N, Yue Y, Ren Y, Tur M, Kristensen P, Huang H, Willner A E and Ramachandran S 2013Science 340 1545–1548

    work page

  62. [63]

    Express 19 14277–14289 URL http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm? URI=oe-19-15-14277

    Djordjevic I B 2011 Opt. Express 19 14277–14289 URL http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm? URI=oe-19-15-14277

    work page 2011

  63. [64]

    Qu Z and Djordjevic I B 2016 Opt. Lett. 41 3285–3288 URL http://ol.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI= ol-41-14-3285

    work page 2016

  64. [65]

    Wang J, Yang J Y, Fazal I M, Ahmed N, Yan Y, Huang H, Ren Y, Yue Y, Dolinar S, Tur M and Willner A E 2012 Nature Photonics 6 488–496 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.138

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2012.138 2012

  65. [66]

    Willner A E, Huang H, Yan Y, Ren Y, Ahmed N, Xie G, Bao C, Li L, Cao Y, Zhao Z, Wang J, Lavery M P J, Tur M, Ramachandran S, Molisch A F, Ashrafi N and Ashrafi S 2015 Adv. Opt. Photon. 7 66–106 URL http://aop.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI=aop-7-1-66

    work page 2015

  66. [67]

    Zhu L, Wang A, Chen S, Liu J, Du C, Mo Q and Wang J 2016 Experimental demonstration of orbital angular momentum (oam) modes transmission in a 2.6 km conventional graded-index multimode fiber assisted by high efficient mode-group excitation Optical Fiber Communication Conference (Optical Society of America) p W2A.32 URL http://www.osapublishing.org/abstract.c...

    work page 2016

  67. [68]

    Gaffoglio R, Cagliero A, De Vita A and Sacco B 2016 Radio Science 51 645–658 URL https://doi.org/ 10.1002/2015RS005862

    work page doi:10.1002/2015rs005862 2016

  68. [69]

    Mohammadi S M, Daldorff L K S, Bergman J E S, Karlsson R L, Thid´ e B, Forozesh K and D C T 2010 IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 58 565–572

    work page 2010

  69. [70]

    Tamburini F, Mari E, Sponselli A, Thid´ e B, Bianchini A and Romanato F 2012New Journal of Physics 14 033001 URL http://stacks.iop.org/1367-2630/14/i=3/a=033001

    work page

  70. [71]

    Thid´ e B, Then H, Sj¨ oholm J, Palmer K, Bergman J, Carozzi T D, Istomin Y N, Ibragimov N H and Khamitova R 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99(8) 087701 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.99.087701

    work page 2007

  71. [72]

    Yan Y, Xie G, Lavery M P J, Huang H, Ahmed N, Bao C, Ren Y, Cao Y, Li L, Zhao Z, Molisch A F, Tur M, Padgett M J and Willner A E 2014 Nature Communications 5 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ ncomms5876

    work page 2014

  72. [73]

    org/1367-2630/17/i=4/a=043040

    Andersson M, Berglind E and Bj¨ ork G 2015New Journal of Physics 17 043040 URL http://stacks.iop. org/1367-2630/17/i=4/a=043040

    work page

  73. [74]

    Berglind E and Bj¨ ork G 2014IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 62 779–788

    work page

  74. [75]

    Chen M, Dholakia K and Mazilu M 2016 Scientific Reports 6 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep22821

    work page doi:10.1038/srep22821 2016

  75. [76]

    Edfors O and Johansson A J 2012 IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 60 1126–1131

    work page 2012

  76. [77]

    Gaffoglio R, Cagliero A, Vecchi G and Andriulli F P 2018 IEEE Access 6 19814–19822

    work page 2018

  77. [78]

    Tamagnone M, Craeye C and Perruisseau-Carrier J 2012 New Journal of Physics 14 118001 URL http://stacks.iop.org/1367-2630/14/i=11/a=118001

    work page 2012

  78. [79]

    Tamagnone M, Craeye C and Perruisseau-Carrier J 2013 New Journal of Physics 15 078001 URL http://stacks.iop.org/1367-2630/15/i=7/a=078001

    work page 2013

  79. [80]

    Miller W 1977 Symmetry and Separation of Variables 2nd ed (Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Inc., Reading, MA)

    work page 1977

  80. [81]

    Morse P M and Feshbach H 1953 Methods of Theoretical Physics (McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York)

    work page 1953

Showing first 80 references.