pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.09533 · v1 · pith:643GSRY6new · submitted 2019-07-22 · 🧬 q-bio.NC · eess.SP

Neural Signatures of Motor Skill in the Resting Brain

Ozan \"Ozdenizci , Timm Meyer , Felix Wichmann , Jan Peters , Bernhard Sch\"olkopf , M\"ujdat \c{C}etin , Moritz Grosse-Wentrup This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 17:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.NC eess.SP
keywords EEGalpha rhythmsmotor skillresting statevisuomotor learningmovement smoothnessstroke rehabilitationneurofeedback
0
0 comments X

The pith

Resting alpha-rhythm patterns predict how smoothly people move across individuals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that differences in motor skill, measured by average movement smoothness in a 3D visuomotor task, can be read out from the overall layout of alpha-band activity (8-14 Hz) in EEG recorded while participants simply rest before any task begins. This resting-state signature remains independent of both the immediate task demands and any alpha changes that occur while participants learn the movement. The authors treat the pre-task alpha configuration as an organizing principle that shapes motor performance rather than a byproduct of practice. If the relation holds, it supplies a potential biomarker for motor ability that could be measured without requiring the person to perform the skill itself.

Core claim

Across-subjects variations in average movement smoothness as the quantified measure of subjects' motor skills can be predicted from the global configuration of resting-state EEG alpha-rhythms (8-14 Hz) recorded prior to the experiment. This neural signature of motor skill was found to be orthogonal to task- as well as to learning-related changes in alpha-rhythms, which the authors interpret as an organizing principle of the brain.

What carries the argument

The global configuration of resting-state EEG alpha-rhythms (8-14 Hz) recorded before any task begins.

If this is right

  • Disturbances of the same resting alpha configurations may contribute to motor deficits observed after stroke.
  • Reconfiguring patients' resting alpha rhythms through neurofeedback could improve outcomes in post-stroke rehabilitation.
  • The motor-skill signature operates separately from any alpha changes produced by performing or learning the task.
  • Motor skill level can be estimated from a short resting EEG recording without requiring the participant to execute the movement.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same resting alpha measure might also forecast skill acquisition rates in other domains such as speech or balance training.
  • If the configuration is stable within a person over days, it could serve as a trait-like marker for selecting candidates for intensive motor training.
  • Clinical translation would require testing whether stroke patients show systematic deviations in the same alpha layout that healthy participants use to predict smoothness.

Load-bearing premise

The observed statistical link between pre-task resting alpha layout and movement smoothness reflects a stable brain-wide principle rather than an accidental correlation driven by unmeasured factors such as arousal, head size, or electrode placement.

What would settle it

Finding that the predictive relationship between resting alpha configuration and movement smoothness disappears in a new sample once head size, arousal, and electrode impedance are explicitly controlled or matched.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.09533 by Bernhard Sch\"olkopf, Felix Wichmann, Jan Peters, Moritz Grosse-Wentrup, M\"ujdat \c{C}etin, Ozan \"Ozdenizci, Timm Meyer.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Overview of the experimental setup. (b) Sample reaching move [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Presented visual feedback. (a) Baseline phase (5 sec): blank scene; subject is instructed to relax. (b) Planning phase (2.5–4 sec): white sphere [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: First column: Topographies of the six ICs used in the regression [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Histogram of average NARJ values across participants. Lower [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Weights of the global multivariate linear regression model for each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Group-average ERD/ERS of the global configuration of brain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Pre- and post-experiment values of resting-state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Stroke-induced disturbances of large-scale cortical networks are known to be associated with the extent of motor deficits. We argue that identifying brain networks representative of motor behavior in the resting brain would provide significant insights for current neurorehabilitation approaches. Particularly, we aim to investigate the global configuration of brain rhythms and their relation to motor skill, instead of learning performance as broadly studied. We empirically approach this problem by conducting a three-dimensional physical space visuomotor learning experiment during electroencephalographic (EEG) data recordings with thirty-seven healthy participants. We demonstrate that across-subjects variations in average movement smoothness as the quantified measure of subjects' motor skills can be predicted from the global configuration of resting-state EEG alpha-rhythms (8-14 Hz) recorded prior to the experiment. Importantly, this neural signature of motor skill was found to be orthogonal to (independent of) task -- as well as to learning-related changes in alpha-rhythms, which we interpret as an organizing principle of the brain. We argue that disturbances of such configurations in the brain may contribute to motor deficits in stroke, and that reconfiguring stroke patients' brain rhythms by neurofeedback may enhance post-stroke neurorehabilitation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an EEG study with 37 healthy participants performing a 3D visuomotor learning task. It claims that across-subject differences in average movement smoothness (taken as a measure of motor skill) can be predicted from the global spatial configuration of pre-task resting-state alpha-band (8-14 Hz) EEG activity, and that this relationship is statistically orthogonal to both task execution and learning-induced changes in the same frequency band. The authors interpret the finding as evidence of a stable, task-independent organizing principle of the brain with potential relevance to post-stroke neurorehabilitation via neurofeedback.

Significance. If the reported predictive relationship survives rigorous validation and confound control, the result would supply a candidate resting-state biomarker for individual differences in motor skill that is independent of online task performance. This orthogonality, if demonstrated, would strengthen the case for a trait-like neural signature rather than a state-dependent correlate, with direct implications for designing neurofeedback protocols aimed at reconfiguring alpha topography in stroke patients.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Results] Abstract and Results: the central claim of a predictive relationship between pre-task alpha configuration and movement smoothness is stated without any quantitative performance metrics (correlation coefficient, R², RMSE), cross-validation scheme, or multiple-comparison correction. With n=37, these details are load-bearing for assessing whether the reported prediction exceeds chance or sample-specific noise.
  2. [Methods / Results] Methods / Results: no description is provided of regression or partial-correlation analyses that control for plausible confounds (arousal, head circumference, electrode impedance or placement) that could co-vary with both resting alpha topography and the chosen smoothness metric. The skeptic concern that the correlation may be spurious therefore remains unaddressed in the reported analyses.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / Introduction] The phrase 'global configuration' is used repeatedly but never given an explicit operational definition (e.g., which spatial features, dimensionality reduction method, or distance metric).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and constructive comments, which highlight important aspects of statistical rigor and confound control. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Results] Abstract and Results: the central claim of a predictive relationship between pre-task alpha configuration and movement smoothness is stated without any quantitative performance metrics (correlation coefficient, R², RMSE), cross-validation scheme, or multiple-comparison correction. With n=37, these details are load-bearing for assessing whether the reported prediction exceeds chance or sample-specific noise.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative performance metrics, cross-validation procedures, and multiple-comparison corrections are necessary to substantiate the predictive claim, particularly given the sample size. The original manuscript reports the existence of a predictive relationship but does not include these specifics in the Abstract or Results. In the revision we will add the correlation coefficient, R², any RMSE if applicable, a description of the cross-validation scheme (e.g., leave-one-out or k-fold), and details of multiple-comparison correction to allow readers to evaluate robustness against chance. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods / Results] Methods / Results: no description is provided of regression or partial-correlation analyses that control for plausible confounds (arousal, head circumference, electrode impedance or placement) that could co-vary with both resting alpha topography and the chosen smoothness metric. The skeptic concern that the correlation may be spurious therefore remains unaddressed in the reported analyses.

    Authors: We acknowledge that explicit control for potential confounds such as arousal, head circumference, electrode impedance, and placement is required to strengthen the claim against spurious correlations. The manuscript demonstrates orthogonality to task execution and learning-related alpha changes but does not report partial-correlation or regression analyses that additionally covary out the listed physiological and technical factors. We will add these control analyses to the Methods and Results sections of the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical correlation claim is self-contained and externally falsifiable

full rationale

The paper reports an empirical statistical relationship observed in EEG and behavioral data from 37 participants: across-subject variation in movement smoothness is associated with the configuration of pre-task resting alpha rhythms. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are invoked as load-bearing steps that reduce the reported prediction to its own inputs by construction. The central result is a data-driven correlation whose validity can be tested against independent samples or confound controls; it does not rely on renaming, self-definition, or uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' prior work. This is the normal case of a non-circular empirical claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; the paper likely relies on standard EEG frequency-band definitions and smoothness metrics but no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. Details of the global-configuration quantification, statistical model, and orthogonality test are unavailable.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5766 in / 1273 out tokens · 31869 ms · 2026-05-24T17:32:12.998082+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery,

    D. J. Reinkensmeyer, J. L. Emken, and S. C. Cramer, “Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery,” Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. , vol. 6, pp. 497–525, 2004

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation,

    J. W. Krakauer, “Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation,” Current Opinion in Neurology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 84–90, 2006

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles,

    S. L. Bressler and V . Menon, “Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences , vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 277–290, 2010

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Central mechanisms of motor skill learning,

    O. Hikosaka, K. Nakamura, K. Sakai, and H. Nakahara, “Central mechanisms of motor skill learning,” Current Opinion in Neurobi- ology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 217–222, 2002

    work page 2002

  5. [5]

    Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain,

    S. T. Grafton and A. F. d. C. Hamilton, “Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain,” Human Movement Science, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 590–616, 2007

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    Motor imagery after stroke: relating outcome to motor network connectivity,

    N. Sharma, J.-C. Baron, and J. B. Rowe, “Motor imagery after stroke: relating outcome to motor network connectivity,”Annals of Neurology, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 604–616, 2009

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Altered resting-state effective connectivity of fronto-parietal motor control systems on the primary motor network following stroke,

    C. S. Inman et al. , “Altered resting-state effective connectivity of fronto-parietal motor control systems on the primary motor network following stroke,” NeuroImage, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 227–237, 2012

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Altered functional organization within and between resting-state networks in chronic subcortical infarction,

    C. Wang et al. , “Altered functional organization within and between resting-state networks in chronic subcortical infarction,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism , vol. 34, no. 4, 2014

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    Structural and resting-state brain connectivity of motor networks after stroke,

    A. Thiel and S. Vahdat, “Structural and resting-state brain connectivity of motor networks after stroke,” Stroke, vol. 46, no. 1, 2015

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain net- works during learning,

    D. S. Bassett et al. , “Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain net- works during learning,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 108, no. 18, pp. 7641–7646, 2011

    work page 2011

  11. [11]

    Brain–computer interfaces: commu- nication and restoration of movement in paralysis,

    N. Birbaumer and L. G. Cohen, “Brain–computer interfaces: commu- nication and restoration of movement in paralysis,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 579, no. 3, pp. 621–636, 2007

    work page 2007

  12. [12]

    Closing the sensorimotor loop: haptic feedback facilitates decoding of motor imagery,

    M. Gomez-Rodriguez et al. , “Closing the sensorimotor loop: haptic feedback facilitates decoding of motor imagery,” Journal of Neural Engineering, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 036005, 2011

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    Proprioceptive feedback and brain computer interface (BCI) based neuroprostheses,

    A. Ramos-Murguialday et al. , “Proprioceptive feedback and brain computer interface (BCI) based neuroprostheses,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 10, p. e47048, 2012

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    Brain computer interface based robotic rehabilitation with online modifica- tion of task speed,

    M. Sarac ¸, E. Koyas ¸, A. Erdo ˘gan, M. C ¸ etin, and V . Pato˘glu, “Brain computer interface based robotic rehabilitation with online modifica- tion of task speed,” in IEEE International Conference on Rehabilita- tion Robotics, 2013

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    Brain-computer interface-based robotic end ef- fector system for wrist and hand rehabilitation: results of a three- armed randomized controlled trial for chronic stroke,

    K. K. Ang et al. , “Brain-computer interface-based robotic end ef- fector system for wrist and hand rehabilitation: results of a three- armed randomized controlled trial for chronic stroke,” Frontiers in Neuroengineering, vol. 7, 2014

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    A randomized controlled trial of EEG-based motor imagery brain-computer interface robotic rehabilitation for stroke,

    ——, “A randomized controlled trial of EEG-based motor imagery brain-computer interface robotic rehabilitation for stroke,” Clinical EEG and Neuroscience , vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 310–320, 2015

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    Using brain–computer interfaces to induce neural plasticity and restore function,

    M. Grosse-Wentrup, D. Mattia, and K. Oweiss, “Using brain–computer interfaces to induce neural plasticity and restore function,” Journal of Neural Engineering, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 025004, 2011

    work page 2011

  18. [18]

    Brain–computer interface boosts motor imagery practice during stroke recovery,

    F. Pichiorri et al. , “Brain–computer interface boosts motor imagery practice during stroke recovery,” Annals of Neurology , vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 851–865, 2015

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    Brain–machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: A controlled study,

    A. Ramos-Murguialday et al. , “Brain–machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: A controlled study,”Annals of Neurology, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 100–108, 2013

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain,

    D. Mantini, M. G. Perrucci, C. Del Gratta, G. L. Romani, and M. Corbetta, “Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 104, no. 32, pp. 13 170–13 175, 2007

    work page 2007

  21. [21]

    Resting-state cortical connectivity predicts motor skill acquisition,

    J. Wu, R. Srinivasan, A. Kaur, and S. C. Cramer, “Resting-state cortical connectivity predicts motor skill acquisition,” NeuroImage, vol. 91, pp. 84–90, 2014

    work page 2014

  22. [22]

    Electroencephalographic identifiers of motor adaptation learning,

    O. ¨Ozdenizci, M. Yalc ¸ın, A. Erdo˘gan, V . Pato˘glu, M. Grosse-Wentrup, and M. C ¸ etin, “Electroencephalographic identifiers of motor adaptation learning,” Journal of Neural Engineering , vol. 14, no. 4, 2017

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    Predicting motor learning performance from electroen- cephalographic data,

    T. Meyer, J. Peters, T. O. Zander, B. Sch ¨olkopf, and M. Grosse- Wentrup, “Predicting motor learning performance from electroen- cephalographic data,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilita- tion, 2014

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    Resting-state connectivity predicts visuo-motor skill learning,

    A. L. Manuel et al., “Resting-state connectivity predicts visuo-motor skill learning,” NeuroImage, vol. 176, pp. 446–453, 2018

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Human sensorimotor learning: adaptation, skill, and beyond,

    J. W. Krakauer and P. Mazzoni, “Human sensorimotor learning: adaptation, skill, and beyond,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology , vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 636–644, 2011

    work page 2011

  26. [26]

    R. A. Schmidt, T. Lee, C. Winstein, G. Wulf, and H. Zelaznik, Motor Control and Learning, 6E . Human Kinetics, 2018

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model,

    T. Flash and N. Hogan, “The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model,” Journal of Neuro- science, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 1688–1703, 1985

    work page 1985

  28. [28]

    Quantization of continuous arm movements in humans with brain injury,

    H. I. Krebs, M. L. Aisen, B. T. V olpe, and N. Hogan, “Quantization of continuous arm movements in humans with brain injury,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 96, no. 8, 1999

    work page 1999

  29. [29]

    Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery,

    B. Rohrer et al. , “Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery,” Journal of Neuroscience , vol. 22, no. 18, 2002

    work page 2002

  30. [30]

    Brain activations underlying different patterns of perfor- mance improvement during early motor skill learning,

    S. Lefebvre, L. Dricot, W. Gradkowski, P. Laloux, and Y . Vander- meeren, “Brain activations underlying different patterns of perfor- mance improvement during early motor skill learning,” NeuroImage, 2012

    work page 2012

  31. [31]

    The activity in the contralateral primary motor cortex, dorsal premotor and supplementary motor area is modulated by performance gains,

    R. Sosnik, T. Flash, A. Sterkin, B. Hauptmann, and A. Karni, “The activity in the contralateral primary motor cortex, dorsal premotor and supplementary motor area is modulated by performance gains,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience , vol. 8, p. 201, 2014

    work page 2014

  32. [32]

    I. P. Howard and B. J. Rogers, Perceiving in Depth, Volume 2: Stereoscopic Vision. Oxford University Press, 2012

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    Measuring movement irregularity in the upper motor neurone syndrome using normalised average rectified jerk,

    J. A. Cozens and B. B. Bhakta, “Measuring movement irregularity in the upper motor neurone syndrome using normalised average rectified jerk,” Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology , 2003

    work page 2003

  34. [34]

    Minimum jerk trajectory control for rehabilitation and haptic applications,

    F. Amirabdollahian, R. Loureiro, and W. Harwin, “Minimum jerk trajectory control for rehabilitation and haptic applications,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation , vol. 4, 2002

    work page 2002

  35. [35]

    Minimum jerk control of power assisting robot on human arm behavior characteristic,

    H. Seki and S. Tadakuma, “Minimum jerk control of power assisting robot on human arm behavior characteristic,” in IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics , 2004

    work page 2004

  36. [36]

    The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. a method for evaluation of phys- ical performance

    A. R. Fugl-Meyer, L. J ¨a¨ask¨o, I. Leyman, S. Olsson, and S. Steglind, “The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. a method for evaluation of phys- ical performance.” Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine , vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 13–31, 1975

    work page 1975

  37. [37]

    The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements,

    R. Oostenveld and P. Praamstra, “The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements,” Clinical Neurophysiol- ogy, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 713–719, 2001

    work page 2001

  38. [38]

    BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer inter- face (BCI) system,

    G. Schalk et al. , “BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer inter- face (BCI) system,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering , vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1034–1043, 2004

    work page 2004

  39. [39]

    EEG differences between eyes-closed and eyes-open resting conditions,

    R. J. Barry, A. R. Clarke, S. J. Johnstone, C. A. Magee, and J. A. Rushby, “EEG differences between eyes-closed and eyes-open resting conditions,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 118, no. 12, 2007

    work page 2007

  40. [40]

    Alpha coherence predicts accuracy during a visuomotor tracking task,

    A. J. Rilk, S. R. Soekadar, P. Sauseng, and C. Plewnia, “Alpha coherence predicts accuracy during a visuomotor tracking task,” Neu- ropsychologia, vol. 49, no. 13, pp. 3704–3709, 2011

    work page 2011

  41. [41]

    The role of alpha-rhythm states in perceptual learning: insights from experiments and computational models,

    R. Sigala, S. Haufe, D. Roy, H. R. Dinse, and P. Ritter, “The role of alpha-rhythm states in perceptual learning: insights from experiments and computational models,” Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, vol. 8, p. 36, 2014

    work page 2014

  42. [42]

    A blind source separation technique using second-order statistics,

    A. Belouchrani, K. Abed-Meraim, J.-F. Cardoso, and E. Moulines, “A blind source separation technique using second-order statistics,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 434–444, 1997

    work page 1997

  43. [43]

    Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation,

    T.-P. Jung et al., “Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation,” Psychophysiology, vol. 37, no. 02, 2000

    work page 2000

  44. [44]

    Independent EEG sources are dipolar,

    A. Delorme, J. Palmer, J. Onton, R. Oostenveld, and S. Makeig, “Independent EEG sources are dipolar,” PLoS ONE, 2012

    work page 2012

  45. [45]

    Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learn- ing,

    M. A. Smith, A. Ghazizadeh, and R. Shadmehr, “Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learn- ing,” PLoS Biol, vol. 4, no. 6, p. e179, 2006

    work page 2006

  46. [46]

    P. J. Rousseeuw and A. M. Leroy, Robust regression and outlier detection. John Wiley & Sons, 2005, vol. 589

    work page 2005

  47. [47]

    Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles,

    G. Pfurtscheller and F. H. L. Da Silva, “Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 110, no. 11, pp. 1842–1857, 1999

    work page 1999

  48. [48]

    Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing,

    Y . Benjamini and Y . Hochberg, “Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) , 1995

    work page 1995

  49. [49]

    Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice,

    A. Newell and P. S. Rosenbloom, “Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice,” in Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition , J. R. Anderson, Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1981, pp. 1–55

    work page 1981

  50. [50]

    Functionally specific changes in resting-state sensorimotor networks after motor learning,

    S. Vahdat, M. Darainy, T. E. Milner, and D. J. Ostry, “Functionally specific changes in resting-state sensorimotor networks after motor learning,” The Journal of Neuroscience , vol. 31, no. 47, 2011

    work page 2011

  51. [51]

    Neural activations during visual sequence learning leave a trace in post-training spontaneous EEG,

    C. Moisello et al., “Neural activations during visual sequence learning leave a trace in post-training spontaneous EEG,” PloS ONE , vol. 8, no. 6, p. e65882, 2013

    work page 2013

  52. [52]

    Correlations of motor adaptation learning and modu- lation of resting-state sensorimotor EEG activity,

    O. ¨Ozdenizci, M. Yalc ¸ın, A. Erdo˘gan, V . Pato˘glu, M. Grosse-Wentrup, and M. C ¸ etin, “Correlations of motor adaptation learning and modu- lation of resting-state sensorimotor EEG activity,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Brain-Computer Interface Conference , 2017

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    Integrative visuo- motor behavior is associated with interregionally coherent oscillations in the human brain,

    J. Classen, C. Gerloff, M. Honda, and M. Hallett, “Integrative visuo- motor behavior is associated with interregionally coherent oscillations in the human brain,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 79, no. 3, 1998

    work page 1998

  54. [54]

    Frontal midline theta and the error-related negativity: neurophysiological mechanisms of action regulation,

    P. Luu, D. M. Tucker, and S. Makeig, “Frontal midline theta and the error-related negativity: neurophysiological mechanisms of action regulation,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 115, no. 8, 2004

    work page 2004

  55. [55]

    The role of parietal cortex in visuomotor control: what have we learned from neuroimaging?

    J. C. Culham, C. Cavina-Pratesi, and A. Singhal, “The role of parietal cortex in visuomotor control: what have we learned from neuroimaging?” Neuropsychologia, vol. 44, no. 13, 2006

    work page 2006

  56. [56]

    Towards neurofeedback training of associative brain areas for stroke reha- bilitation,

    O. ¨Ozdenizci, T. Meyer, M. C ¸ etin, and M. Grosse-Wentrup, “Towards neurofeedback training of associative brain areas for stroke reha- bilitation,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Brain-Computer Interface Conference, 2014

    work page 2014

  57. [57]

    Personalized brain-computer interface models for motor rehabilitation,

    A. A. Mastakouri, S. Weichwald, O. ¨Ozdenizci, T. Meyer, B. Sch ¨olkopf, and M. Grosse-Wentrup, “Personalized brain-computer interface models for motor rehabilitation,” in IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics , 2017

    work page 2017