pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.09604 · v1 · pith:ZUIFXBLSnew · submitted 2019-07-22 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech

Fluctuation relations and strong inequalities for thermally isolated systems

Christopher Jarzynski This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 17:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords fluctuation relationsadiabatic processesnonequilibrium workstrong thermodynamic boundthermally isolated systemswork inequalities
0
0 comments X

The pith

An integral fluctuation relation for adiabatic processes yields inequalities for the strong work bound W ≥ ΔE_S.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives an integral fluctuation relation ⟨exp(−βX)⟩ = 1 that applies specifically to thermally isolated macroscopic systems undergoing adiabatic processes. This relation is constructed from the known nonequilibrium work relation and is then used to obtain statistical inequalities associated with the strong thermodynamic bound given by a fixed-entropy internal energy difference. Both classical and quantum derivations are supplied. A sympathetic reader would care because the result supplies a statistical mechanics foundation for a stricter lower bound on work than the familiar fixed-temperature free energy bound.

Core claim

For processes during which a macroscopic system exchanges no heat with its surroundings, an integral fluctuation relation ⟨exp(−βX)⟩ = 1 holds that is constructed specifically for adiabatic processes; this relation implies inequalities related to the strong bound W ≥ ΔE_S.

What carries the argument

The integral fluctuation relation ⟨exp(−βX)⟩ = 1 for adiabatic processes, derived by adapting the nonequilibrium work relation to cases with no heat exchange.

If this is right

  • Statistical inequalities tied to the strong bound W ≥ ΔE_S follow directly from the new relation.
  • The results hold for both classical and quantum systems.
  • The adiabatic fluctuation relation complements the nonequilibrium work relation that yields the weak bound W ≥ ΔF_T.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The relation may permit tighter estimates of work fluctuations when heat exchange is strictly forbidden.
  • It could be checked in molecular dynamics trajectories that enforce strict adiabatic evolution.
  • Similar constructions might apply to other constraints such as fixed-volume or fixed-magnetization processes.

Load-bearing premise

The processes are thermally isolated and the systems are macroscopic, so the nonequilibrium work relation can serve as the starting point for the new adiabatic fluctuation relation.

What would settle it

A direct numerical simulation or laboratory measurement of an adiabatic process in which the ensemble average of exp(−βX) deviates from 1 would falsify the claimed relation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.09604 by Christopher Jarzynski.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Vertical axes denote energies. The curved solid line represents the energy of a trajectory [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

For processes during which a macroscopic system exchanges no heat with its surroundings, the second law of thermodynamics places two lower bounds on the amount of work performed on the system: a weak bound, expressed in terms of a fixed-temperature free energy difference, $W \ge \Delta F_T$ , and a strong bound, given by a fixed-entropy internal energy difference, $W \ge \Delta E_S$ . It is known that statistical inequalities related to the weak bound can be obtained from the nonequilibrium work relation, $\langle\exp (-\beta W)\rangle = \exp(-\beta\Delta F_T)$ . Here we derive an integral fluctuation relation $\langle\exp(-\beta X) \rangle = 1 $ that is constructed specifically for adiabatic processes, and we use this result to obtain inequalities related to the strong bound, $W \ge \Delta E_S$ . We provide both classical and quantum derivations of these results.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to derive an integral fluctuation relation ⟨exp(−βX)⟩ = 1 constructed specifically for adiabatic processes in thermally isolated macroscopic systems. This is used to obtain inequalities related to the strong bound W ≥ ΔE_S. Both classical and quantum derivations are provided, starting from the known nonequilibrium work relation ⟨exp(−βW)⟩ = exp(−βΔF_T).

Significance. If valid, the result would extend fluctuation theorems to isolated adiabatic systems and furnish a statistical basis for the strong second-law bound, which is stronger than the usual free-energy bound and relevant for nonequilibrium thermodynamics.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract (and the classical/quantum derivation sections)] The central construction begins from the nonequilibrium work relation (known to require coupling to a reservoir that fixes β throughout the protocol) yet targets thermally isolated systems with no heat exchange. The manuscript must show explicitly (in the classical derivation and the quantum derivation) how X is defined and how the equality ⟨exp(−βX)⟩ = 1 is obtained without reintroducing the bath assumption or replacing it only by an uncontrolled macroscopic-limit argument; otherwise the subsequent Jensen inequality yielding W ≥ ΔE_S rests on an unverified step.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript. The major comment raises an important point about the applicability of the nonequilibrium work relation to isolated systems, and we address it directly below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract (and the classical/quantum derivation sections)] The central construction begins from the nonequilibrium work relation (known to require coupling to a reservoir that fixes β throughout the protocol) yet targets thermally isolated systems with no heat exchange. The manuscript must show explicitly (in the classical derivation and the quantum derivation) how X is defined and how the equality ⟨exp(−βX)⟩ = 1 is obtained without reintroducing the bath assumption or replacing it only by an uncontrolled macroscopic-limit argument; otherwise the subsequent Jensen inequality yielding W ≥ ΔE_S rests on an unverified step.

    Authors: The nonequilibrium work relation holds for a system prepared in a canonical state at inverse temperature β (fixed by the initial equilibrium with a reservoir) followed by Hamiltonian evolution under a time-dependent protocol; continuous coupling to the bath is not required during the driving. In our classical derivation, the system is isolated after the initial preparation, and X is defined as X = W − ΔE_S, where ΔE_S is the internal-energy change evaluated at fixed entropy. The equality ⟨exp(−βX)⟩ = 1 then follows from the initial canonical distribution together with Liouville’s theorem (phase-space volume preservation) under the isolated Hamiltonian dynamics; no further bath coupling or macroscopic-limit approximation is invoked. An analogous construction applies in the quantum case using the unitary evolution of the initial thermal state. We agree that these steps should be written out more explicitly and will revise both the classical and quantum sections to include the full intermediate algebra without relying on any uncontrolled limit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

New adiabatic fluctuation relation constructed from known nonequilibrium work relation treated as external input

full rationale

The abstract states that inequalities for the weak bound follow from the known nonequilibrium work relation ⟨exp(−βW)⟩=exp(−βΔF_T) and then derives a new integral relation ⟨exp(−βX)⟩=1 specifically for adiabatic processes. This known relation is presented as an established external starting point rather than fitted or redefined inside the paper. No quoted equation shows the new equality reducing by construction to the input, no self-citation chain is load-bearing for the central claim, and the derivation is self-contained against the external benchmark of the prior Jarzynski equality. A score of 2 reflects only the minor self-citation aspect of citing the author's own prior result as 'known'.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The derivation rests on standard domain assumptions of statistical mechanics and the pre-existing nonequilibrium work relation; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The nonequilibrium work relation ⟨exp(−βW)⟩ = exp(−βΔF_T) holds and can be used as a starting point
    Abstract explicitly states that statistical inequalities for the weak bound are obtained from this known relation.
  • domain assumption Systems are macroscopic and processes are thermally isolated
    Abstract invokes these conditions to define the context for both weak and strong bounds.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5682 in / 1185 out tokens · 39590 ms · 2026-05-24T17:34:24.989780+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Callen, Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostastistics, Wiley, New York, USA, 1985

    H. Callen, Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostastistics, Wiley, New York, USA, 1985

    work page 1985

  2. [2]

    C. B. P. Finn, Thermal Physics, 2nd Edition, Chapman and Hall, 1993

    work page 1993

  3. [3]

    Evans, D

    D. Evans, D. Searles, The fluctuation theorem, Adv. Phys. 51 (2002) 1529–1585

    work page 2002

  4. [4]

    Bustamante, J

    C. Bustamante, J. Liphardt, F. Ritort, The nonequilibrium thermodynamics of small systems, Phys. Today 58 (7) (2005) 43–48

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    Cleuren, C

    B. Cleuren, C. Van den Broeck, R. Kawai, Fluctuation and dissipation, C.R. Physique 8 (2007) 567–578

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    Esposito, U

    M. Esposito, U. Harbola, S. Mukamel, Nonequilibrium fluctuations, fluctuation theorems, and counting statistics in quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2009) 1665–1702

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Sekimoto, Stochasic Energetics, Springer, Berlin, 2010

    K. Sekimoto, Stochasic Energetics, Springer, Berlin, 2010

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Six out of equilibrium lectures

    J. Kurchan, Six out of equilibrium lectures, Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School 90, arXiv:0901.1271v2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Campisi, P

    M. Campisi, P. H ¨anggi, P. Talkner, Colloquium: Quantum fluctuation relations: Foundations and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 (2011) 771–791

    work page 2011

  10. [10]

    Jarzynski, Equalities and inequalities: irreversibility and the second law of thermodynamics at the nanoscale, Annu

    C. Jarzynski, Equalities and inequalities: irreversibility and the second law of thermodynamics at the nanoscale, Annu. Rev. Cond. Matt. Phys. 2 (2011) 329 – 351

    work page 2011

  11. [11]

    Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems and molecular machines, Rep

    U. Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems and molecular machines, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75 (2012) 126001

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy di fferences, Phys

    C. Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy di fferences, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (14) (1997) 2690 – 2693

    work page 1997

  13. [13]

    Jarzynski, Equilibrium free-energy di fferences from nonequilibrium measurements: A master-equation approach, Phys

    C. Jarzynski, Equilibrium free-energy di fferences from nonequilibrium measurements: A master-equation approach, Phys. Rev. E 56 (5) (1997) 5018 – 5035

    work page 1997

  14. [14]

    Engel, P

    T. Engel, P. J. Reid, Thermodynamics, Statistical Thermodynamics, and Kinetics, Pearson, San Francisco, 2006

    work page 2006

  15. [15]

    Jarzynski, Microscopic analysis of clausius-duhem processes, J

    C. Jarzynski, Microscopic analysis of clausius-duhem processes, J. Stat. Phys. 96 (1999) 415 – 427

    work page 1999

  16. [16]

    J. R. Dorfman, An Introduction to Chaos in Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1999

    work page 1999

  17. [17]

    Hertz, ¨Uber die mechanischen grundlagen der thermodynamik, I, Ann

    P. Hertz, ¨Uber die mechanischen grundlagen der thermodynamik, I, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 33 (1910) 225

    work page 1910

  18. [18]

    Hertz, ¨Uber die mechanischen grundlagen der thermodynamik, II, Ann

    P. Hertz, ¨Uber die mechanischen grundlagen der thermodynamik, II, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 33 (1910) 537

    work page 1910

  19. [19]

    Anosov, Averaging in systems of ordinary di fferential equations with rapidly oscillating solutions, Izv

    D. Anosov, Averaging in systems of ordinary di fferential equations with rapidly oscillating solutions, Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR Ser. Mat. 24 (1960) 721–742

    work page 1960

  20. [20]

    Kasuga, On the adiabatic theorem for the Hamiltonian system of di fferential equations in the classical mechanics, I, Proc

    T. Kasuga, On the adiabatic theorem for the Hamiltonian system of di fferential equations in the classical mechanics, I, Proc. Japan Acad. 37 (1961) 366–371

    work page 1961

  21. [21]

    Kasuga, On the adiabatic theorem for the Hamiltonian system of di fferential equations in the classical mechanics, II, Proc

    T. Kasuga, On the adiabatic theorem for the Hamiltonian system of di fferential equations in the classical mechanics, II, Proc. Japan Acad. 37 (1961) 372–376

    work page 1961

  22. [22]

    Kasuga, On the adiabatic theorem for the Hamiltonian system of di fferential equations in the classical mechanics, III, Proc

    T. Kasuga, On the adiabatic theorem for the Hamiltonian system of di fferential equations in the classical mechanics, III, Proc. Japan Acad. 37 (1961) 377–382

    work page 1961

  23. [23]

    Ott, Goodness of ergodic adiabatic invariants, Phys

    E. Ott, Goodness of ergodic adiabatic invariants, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42 (24) (1979) 1628–1631

    work page 1979

  24. [24]

    Lochak, C

    P. Lochak, C. Meunier, Multiphase Averaging for Classical Systems: With Applications to Adiabatic Theorems, V ol. 72 of Applied Mathe- matical Series, Springer-Verlag, 1988

    work page 1988

  25. [25]

    J. W. Gibbs, Elementary Principles in Statistical Mechanics, Yale University Press, 1902, p93

    work page 1902

  26. [26]

    G. E. Crooks, C. Jarzynski, Work distribution for the adiabatic compression of a dilute and interacting classical gas, Phys. Rev. E 75 (2007) 021116

    work page 2007

  27. [27]

    I. Bena, C. Van den Broeck, R. Kawai, Jarzynski equality for the Jepsen gas, Europhys. Lett. 71 (6) (2005) 879–885

    work page 2005

  28. [28]

    Dunkel, S

    J. Dunkel, S. Hilbert, Consistent thermostatistics forbids negative absolute temperatures, Nat. Physics 10 (2014) 67–72

    work page 2014

  29. [29]

    Sokolov, Not hotter than hot, Nat

    I. Sokolov, Not hotter than hot, Nat. Physics 10 (2014) 7–8

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    Vilar, J

    J. Vilar, J. Rubi, System-size scaling of Boltzmann and alternate Gibbs entropies, J. Chem. Phys. 140 (2014) 201101

    work page 2014

  31. [31]

    Frenkel, Gibbs, Boltzmann, and negative temperatures, Am

    D. Frenkel, Gibbs, Boltzmann, and negative temperatures, Am. J. Phys. 83 (2015) 163

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    Hyperspherical Treatment of Strongly-Interacting Few-Fermion Systems in One Dimension

    J. Dunkel, S. Hilbert, Reply to Frenkel and Warren, arXiv:1408.6058 (2014)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  33. [33]

    Comment on "Consistent thermostatistics forbids negative absolute temperatures"

    U. Schneider, S. Mandt, A. Rapp, S. Braun, H. Weimer, I. Bloch, A. Rosch, Comment on “consistent thermostatistics forbids negative absolute temperatures”, arXiv:1407.4127 (2014)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  34. [34]

    Reply to Schneider et al. [arXiv:1407.4127v1]

    J. Dunkel, S. Hilbert, Reply to Schneider et al, arXiv:1408.5392 (2014)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  35. [35]

    Hilbert, P

    S. Hilbert, P. H ¨anggi, J. Dunkel, Thermodynamic laws in isolated systems, Phys. Rev. E 90 (2014) 062116

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    Campisi, Construction of microcanonical entropy on thermodynamic pillars, Phys

    M. Campisi, Construction of microcanonical entropy on thermodynamic pillars, Phys. Rev. E 91 (2015) 052147

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    Swendsen, J.-S

    R. Swendsen, J.-S. Wang., Negative temperatures and the definition of entropy, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 453 (2016) 24–34

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    J. L. Lebowitz, Macroscopic laws, microscopic dynamics, time’s arrow and boltzmann’s entropy, Physica A 194 (1993) 1–27

    work page 1993

  39. [39]

    Berdichevsky, A connection between thermodynamic entropy and probability, J

    V . Berdichevsky, A connection between thermodynamic entropy and probability, J. Appl. Math. Mech. (PMM) 52 (6) (1988) 947–957

    work page 1988

  40. [40]

    Berdichevsky, Thermodynamics of order and chaos, Addison Wesley Longman Limited, Essex, 1997

    V . Berdichevsky, Thermodynamics of order and chaos, Addison Wesley Longman Limited, Essex, 1997

    work page 1997

  41. [41]

    Campisi, On the mechanical foundations of thermodynamics: The generalized helmholtz theorem, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (2005) 275–290

    M. Campisi, On the mechanical foundations of thermodynamics: The generalized helmholtz theorem, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (2005) 275–290

    work page 2005

  42. [42]

    Kurchan, A quantum fluctuation theorem, arXiv:cond-mat /0007360v2 (August 2000)

    J. Kurchan, A quantum fluctuation theorem, arXiv:cond-mat /0007360v2 (August 2000)

    work page 2000

  43. [43]

    Tasaki, Jarzynski relations for quantum systems and some applications, arXiv:cond-mat /0009244v2 (Sep 2000)

    H. Tasaki, Jarzynski relations for quantum systems and some applications, arXiv:cond-mat /0009244v2 (Sep 2000)

    work page 2000

  44. [44]

    Mukamel, Quantum extension of the Jarzynski relation: Analogy with stochastic dephasing, Phys

    S. Mukamel, Quantum extension of the Jarzynski relation: Analogy with stochastic dephasing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (17) (2003) 170604

    work page 2003

  45. [45]

    Talkner, E

    P. Talkner, E. Lutz, P. H¨anggi, Fluctuation theorems: Work is not an observable, Phys. Rev. E 75 (2007) 050102(R)

    work page 2007

  46. [46]

    Kafri, S

    D. Kafri, S. De ffner, Holevo’s bound from a general quantum fluctuation theorem, Phys. Rev. A 86 (2012) 044302

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    A. E. Rastegin, Non-equilibrium equalities with unital quantum channels, J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. Exp. (2013) P06016. 13

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    A. E. Rastegin, K. ˙Zyczkowski, Jarzynski equality for quantum stochastic maps, Phys. Rev. E 89 (1) (2014) 012127

    work page 2014

  49. [49]

    Albash, D

    T. Albash, D. A. Lidar, M. Marvian, P. Zanardi, Fluctuation theorems for quantum processes, Phys. Rev. E 88 (2013) 032146

    work page 2013

  50. [50]

    Manzano, J

    G. Manzano, J. M. Horowitz, J. M. R. Parrondo, Nonequilibrium potential and fluctuation theorems for quantum maps, Phys. Rev. E 92 (2015) 032129

    work page 2015

  51. [51]

    Smith, Y

    A. Smith, Y . Lu, S. An, X. Zhang, J.-N. Zhang, Z. Gong, H. Quan, C. Jarzynski, K. Kim, Verification of the quantum nonequilibrium work relation in the presence of decoherence, New. J. Phys. 20 (2018) 013008

    work page 2018

  52. [52]

    Sinai, Dynamical systems with elastic reflections: Ergodic properties of dispersing billiards, Russ

    Y . Sinai, Dynamical systems with elastic reflections: Ergodic properties of dispersing billiards, Russ. Math. Surveys 25 (1970) 137–189

    work page 1970

  53. [53]

    Bunimovich, On the ergodic properties of nowhere dispersing billiards, Commun

    L. Bunimovich, On the ergodic properties of nowhere dispersing billiards, Commun. Math. Phys. 65 (1979) 295–312

    work page 1979

  54. [54]

    Wojtkowski, Principles for the design o f billiards with nonvanishing Lyapunov exponents, Commun

    M. Wojtkowski, Principles for the design o f billiards with nonvanishing Lyapunov exponents, Commun. Math. Phys. 105 (1986) 391–414

    work page 1986

  55. [55]

    Lichtenberg, M

    A. Lichtenberg, M. Lieberman, Regular and Chaotic Dynamics, Springer, New York, 1992

    work page 1992

  56. [56]

    Lebowitz, Statistical mechanics: A selective review of two central issues, Rev

    J. Lebowitz, Statistical mechanics: A selective review of two central issues, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71 (2) (1999) S346–S357

    work page 1999

  57. [57]

    Tasaki, Statistical mechanical derivation of the second law of thermodynamics, arXiv:cond-mat /0009206v2 (2000)

    H. Tasaki, Statistical mechanical derivation of the second law of thermodynamics, arXiv:cond-mat /0009206v2 (2000)

    work page 2000

  58. [58]

    Campisi, Statistical mechanical proof of the second law of thermodynamics based on volume entropy, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39 (2008) 181 – 194

    M. Campisi, Statistical mechanical proof of the second law of thermodynamics based on volume entropy, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39 (2008) 181 – 194

    work page 2008

  59. [59]

    G. E. Crooks, Nonequilibrium measurements of free energy di fferences for microscopically reversible Markovian systems, J. Stat. Phys. 90 (5-6) (1998) 1481–1487

    work page 1998

  60. [60]

    G. E. Crooks, Entropy production fluctuation theorem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy di fferences, Phys. Rev. E 60 (3) (1999) 2721–2726

    work page 1999

  61. [61]

    Sagawa, M

    T. Sagawa, M. Ueda, Generalized Jarzynski equality under nonequilibrium feedback control, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (9) (2010) 090602

    work page 2010

  62. [62]

    Marathe, J

    R. Marathe, J. M. R. Parrondo, Cooling classical particles with a microcanonical Szilard engine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 245704

    work page 2010

  63. [63]

    Vaikuntanathan, C

    S. Vaikuntanathan, C. Jarzynski, Modeling Maxwells demon with a microcanonical Szilard engine, Phys. Rev. E 83 (2011) 061120

    work page 2011

  64. [64]

    Adib, Entropy and density of states from isoenergetic nonequilibrium processes, Phys

    A. Adib, Entropy and density of states from isoenergetic nonequilibrium processes, Phys. Rev. E 71

    work page

  65. [65]

    Cleuren, C

    B. Cleuren, C. Van den Broeck, R. Kawai, Fluctuation and dissipation of work in a Joule experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (5) (2006) 050601

    work page 2006

  66. [66]

    Ciliberto, Experiments in stochastic thermodynamics: Short history and perspectives, Phys

    S. Ciliberto, Experiments in stochastic thermodynamics: Short history and perspectives, Phys. Rev. X 7 (2017) 021051 /1–26

    work page 2017

  67. [67]

    T. B. Batalh ˜ao, A. M. Souza, L. Mazzola, R. Auccaise, R. S. Sarthour, I. S. Oliveira, J. Goold, G. De Chiara, M. Paternostro, R. M. Serra, Experimental reconstruction of work distribution and study of fluctuation relations in a closed quantum system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 140601

    work page 2014

  68. [68]

    An, J.-N

    S. An, J.-N. Zhang, M. Um, D. Lv, Y . Lu, J. Zhang, Z.-Q. Yin, H. T. Quan, K. Kim, Experimental test of the quantum Jarzynski equality with a trapped-ion system, Nature Physics 11 (2015) 193

    work page 2015

  69. [69]

    T. B. Batalh ˜ao, A. M. Souza, R. S. Sarthour, I. S. Oliveira, M. Paternostro, E. Lutz, R. M. Serra, Irreversibility and the arrow of time in a quenched quantum system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 190601/1–5

    work page 2015

  70. [70]

    Cerisola, Y

    F. Cerisola, Y . Margalit, S. Machluf, A. Roncaglia, J. Paz, R. Folman, Using a quantum work meter to test non-equilibrium fluctuation theorems, Nature Communications 8 (2017) 1241

    work page 2017

  71. [71]

    Medeiros de Ara ´ujo, T

    R. Medeiros de Ara ´ujo, T. H¨affner, R. Bernardi, D. Tasca, M. Lavery, M. Padgett, A. Kanaan, L. C´eleri, P. Souto Ribeiro, Experimental study of quantum thermodynamics using optical vortices, J. Phys. Commun. 2 (2018) 035012

    work page 2018

  72. [72]

    Nagilhoo, J

    M. Nagilhoo, J. Alonso, A. Romito, E. Lutz, K. Murch, Information gain and loss for a quantum Maxwells demon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 030604

    work page 2018

  73. [73]

    S. W. Thomson, Mathematical and Physical Papers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1882

    work page

  74. [74]

    Planck, Thermodynamik, Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, Germany, 1954

    M. Planck, Thermodynamik, Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, Germany, 1954. 14

    work page 1954