pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.09795 · v1 · pith:FKR4MS7Enew · submitted 2019-07-23 · 💻 cs.IT · math.IT

Close Encounters of the Binary Kind: Signal Reconstruction Guarantees for Compressive Hadamard Sampling with Haar Wavelet Basis

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 17:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.IT math.IT
keywords compressive sensingHadamard samplingHaar waveletsrecovery guaranteessample complexityvariable density samplingsingle-pixel imaging
0
0 comments X

The pith

Density-matched sampling yields explicit recovery guarantees for Hadamard measurements of Haar-sparse signals

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes explicit sample-complexity bounds plus uniform and non-uniform recovery guarantees for recovering signals that are sparse in the Haar wavelet basis from subsampled Hadamard measurements. Variable and multilevel density sampling strategies overcome the coherence obstacle between the two bases by tailoring the subsampling pattern to local and multilevel coherence levels. This result supplies the theoretical support that had been missing for practical compressive imaging systems such as single-pixel cameras. A sympathetic reader would care because the bounds make concrete how many binary measurements suffice for faithful reconstruction in both one and two dimensions.

Core claim

By adjusting the subsampling process to the local and multilevel coherence between the Hadamard and Haar bases, the variable and multilevel density sampling strategies enable successful signal recovery, yielding explicit sample-complexity bounds together with uniform and non-uniform recovery guarantees for one- and two-dimensional signals.

What carries the argument

Variable and multilevel density sampling strategies that adjust the subsampling process to the local and multilevel coherence between the Hadamard and Haar bases

Load-bearing premise

The premise that sampling densities can be chosen to match the coherence structure between the two bases closely enough to guarantee recovery without other error sources dominating.

What would settle it

A concrete Haar-sparse test signal that remains unrecoverable from the number of Hadamard samples prescribed by the derived bound when the density strategies are applied.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.09795 by Amirafshar Moshtaghpour, Jos\'e M. Bioucas Dias, Laurent Jacques.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: An example of the 2-D isotropic wavelet levels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Block structure of the matrices HrW(1) r (left) and HrW(0) r (right) where Tl = T 1d l for l ∈ JrK0. Gray color represents zero value. 3.2 Main Results Equipped with the definitions above, we are now ready to develop our main results. To do so, we need to calculate the local coherence (5), multilevel coherence (10), and relative sparsity (9) for the Hadamard-Haar systems in one and two dimensions. Note tha… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Structure of the matrix |(Φ> hadΨdhw)k,k0 | (left), |(Φ> 2hadΨadhw)k,k0 | (middle), and |(Φ> 2hadΨidhw)k,k0 | (right) for N = 8. We observe that the figure in the middle is the Kronecker product of the matrix on the left with itself. This is actually the consequence of the construction of the 2-D Hadamard matrix and ADHW basis using the Kronecker product. where (u)+ := max(u, 0). Noting that |(Hr)k,k0| = 2… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The exact local coherence values for µ loc l (Φ> hadΨdhw) (left), µ loc l (Φ> 2hadΨadhw) (middle), and µ loc l (Φ> 2hadΨidhw) (right) for N = 8, with l1 and l2 defined in Prop. 3. The values shown here are equal to the estimated values in Prop. 3. The block structure of these figures, as represented by the constant color areas fits the definition of the wavelet levels, i.e., with 1-D dyadic (left), 2-D ani… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Rearrangement of the rows and columns of the matrices shown in Fig. 3 with respect to the sampling and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The exact multilevel coherence values for Hadamard-Haar systems with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The reconstruction performance comparison of the proposed MDS and VDS schemes with the traditional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Recovering four special 1-D signals from 20% Hadamard measurements. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The SRE of phantom image recovery from subsampled Hadamard measurements. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Global (left) and local (right) sparsity of the phantom image in 2-D Haar wavelet basis. On the right [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: An example of the reconstructed images from 10% of the Hadamard measurements. These images [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the problems of 1-D and 2-D signal recovery from subsampled Hadamard measurements using Haar wavelet sparsity prior. These problems are of interest in, e.g., computational imaging applications relying on optical multiplexing or single-pixel imaging. However, the realization of such modalities is often hindered by the coherence between the Hadamard and Haar bases. The variable and multilevel density sampling strategies solve this issue by adjusting the subsampling process to the local and multilevel coherence, respectively, between the two bases; hence enabling successful signal recovery. In this work, we compute an explicit sample-complexity bound for Hadamard-Haar systems as well as uniform and non-uniform recovery guarantees; a seemingly missing result in the related literature. We explore the faithfulness of the numerical simulations to the theoretical results and show in a practically relevant instance, e.g., single-pixel camera, that the target signal can be obtained from a few Hadamard measurements.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates 1-D and 2-D signal recovery from subsampled Hadamard measurements under Haar wavelet sparsity priors, motivated by applications such as single-pixel imaging. It identifies coherence between the Hadamard and Haar bases as a barrier to recovery and proposes variable-density and multilevel-density sampling strategies that adapt to local and multilevel coherence. The central contribution is the derivation of explicit sample-complexity bounds together with uniform and non-uniform recovery guarantees for the Hadamard-Haar pair; these are validated through numerical experiments that compare theoretical predictions with observed reconstruction performance.

Significance. If the coherence calculations and application of standard CS recovery theorems are rigorous, the explicit bounds constitute a concrete, previously missing result that directly informs sampling design in optical multiplexing systems. The work supplies parameter-free theoretical guidance rather than purely empirical tuning, which strengthens its utility for practical compressive imaging.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states that bounds and guarantees are computed but does not indicate the precise form of the sample-complexity expression (e.g., dependence on sparsity level, dimension, or coherence parameters); placing the leading-order bound in the abstract would improve immediate accessibility.
  2. Notation for the variable-density and multilevel-density sampling operators is introduced without an explicit comparison table; a short table listing the sampling probabilities per wavelet scale would clarify the distinction between the two strategies.
  3. Several numerical figures compare empirical phase-transition curves to the derived bounds, yet the caption does not state the number of Monte-Carlo trials or the precise recovery algorithm (e.g., basis pursuit or iterative hard thresholding) used; this information belongs in the figure captions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their supportive summary of the manuscript, recognition of its significance for compressive imaging applications, and recommendation of minor revision. No major comments appear in the report, so we have nothing to address point by point.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper derives explicit sample-complexity bounds and recovery guarantees for the Hadamard-Haar pair by computing local and multilevel coherences between the two fixed bases and applying standard compressive sensing theorems (e.g., RIP or NSP) under variable/multilevel density sampling. These steps use the known matrix properties of the Hadamard and Haar transforms without any reduction to fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The sampling densities are defined directly from the coherence quantities rather than being tuned to the target recovery result, and the bounds are presented as new explicit expressions rather than renamings or imported uniqueness results. The derivation chain remains independent of the paper's own outputs and is self-contained against external CS theory.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard compressive-sensing sparsity and coherence assumptions applied to the specific Hadamard-Haar pair; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Signals of interest are sparse in the Haar wavelet basis
    This sparsity prior underpins both the recovery problem and the sample-complexity analysis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5709 in / 1155 out tokens · 40932 ms · 2026-05-24T17:08:14.624937+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Compressed sensing,

    D. L. Donoho, “Compressed sensing,” IEEE transactions on information theory, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1289–1306, 2006

  2. [2]

    Near-optimal signal recovery from random projections: Universal encoding strategies?

    E. J. Cand` es and T. Tao, “Near-optimal signal recovery from random projections: Universal encoding strategies?” IEEE transactions on information theory, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 5406–5425, 2006

  3. [3]

    Compressed sensing MRI,

    M. Lustig, D. L. Donoho, J. M. Santos, and J. M. Pauly, “Compressed sensing MRI,” IEEE signal processing magazine, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 72–82, 2008

  4. [4]

    Compressive fluorescence microscopy for biological and hyperspectral imaging,

    V. Studer, J. Bobin, M. Chahid, H. S. Mousavi, E. Cand` es, and M. Dahan, “Compressive fluorescence microscopy for biological and hyperspectral imaging,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 109, no. 26, pp. E1679–E1687, 2012

  5. [5]

    On asymptotic structure in compressed sensing

    B. Roman, A. C. Hansen, and B. Adcock, “On asymptotic structure in compressed sensing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.4178 , 2014

  6. [6]

    Single-pixel imaging via compressive sampling,

    M. F. Duarte, M. A. Davenport, D. Takhar, J. N. Laska, T. Sun, K. E. Kelly, and R. G. Baraniuk, “Single-pixel imaging via compressive sampling,” IEEE signal processing magazine, vol. 25, no. 2, p. 83, 2008. 30

  7. [7]

    Sparsity and incoherence in compressive sampling,

    E. Cand` es and J. Romberg, “Sparsity and incoherence in compressive sampling,” Inverse problems, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 969–985, 2007

  8. [8]

    The quest for optimal sampling: Computationally efficient, structure-exploiting measurements for compressed sensing,

    B. Adcock, A. C. Hansen, and B. Roman, “The quest for optimal sampling: Computationally efficient, structure-exploiting measurements for compressed sensing,” in Compressed Sensing and its Applications . Springer, 2015, pp. 143–167

  9. [9]

    Structured sampling and recovery of IEEG signals,

    L. Baldassarre, C. Aprile, M. Shoaran, Y. Leblebici, and V. Cevher, “Structured sampling and recovery of IEEG signals,” in IEEE International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing, no. EPFL-CONF-214740, 2015

  10. [10]

    Compressive hyperspectral imaging: Fourier transform interferometry meets single pixel camera,

    A. Moshtaghpour, J. M. Bioucas-Dias, and L. Jacques, “Compressive hyperspectral imaging: Fourier transform interferometry meets single pixel camera,” in international Traveling Work- shop on Interactions between low-complexity data models and Sensing Techniques (iTWIST) , 2018

  11. [11]

    Compressive single-pixel Fourier transform imaging using structured illumination,

    ——, “Compressive single-pixel Fourier transform imaging using structured illumination,” in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , 2019, pp. 7810–7814

  12. [12]

    Breaking the coherence barrier: A new theory for compressed sensing,

    B. Adcock, A. C. Hansen, C. Poon, and B. Roman, “Breaking the coherence barrier: A new theory for compressed sensing,” in Forum of Mathematics, Sigma , vol. 5. Cambridge University Press, 2017

  13. [13]

    Stable and robust sampling strategies for compressive imaging,

    F. Krahmer and R. Ward, “Stable and robust sampling strategies for compressive imaging,” IEEE transactions on image processing , vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 612–622, 2014

  14. [14]

    On variable density compressive sampling,

    G. Puy, P. Vandergheynst, and Y. Wiaux, “On variable density compressive sampling,” IEEE signal processing letters, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 595–598, 2011

  15. [15]

    An analysis of block sampling strategies in compressed sensing,

    J. Bigot, C. Boyer, and P. Weiss, “An analysis of block sampling strategies in compressed sensing,” IEEE transactions on information theory , vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 2125–2139, 2016

  16. [16]

    Compressed sensing with structured sparsity and structured acquisition,

    C. Boyer, J. Bigot, and P. Weiss, “Compressed sensing with structured sparsity and structured acquisition,” Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis , 2017

  17. [17]

    Compressed sensing with local structure: uniform recovery guarantees for the sparsity in levels class,

    C. Li and B. Adcock, “Compressed sensing with local structure: uniform recovery guarantees for the sparsity in levels class,” Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis , 2017

  18. [18]

    Foucart and H

    S. Foucart and H. Rauhut, A mathematical introduction to compressive sensing . Birkh¨ auser Basel, 2013, vol. 1, no. 3

  19. [19]

    Decoding by linear programming,

    E. J. Cand` es and T. Tao, “Decoding by linear programming,” IEEE transactions on informa- tion theory, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 4203–4215, 2005

  20. [20]

    Extensions of compressed sensing,

    Y. Tsaig and D. L. Donoho, “Extensions of compressed sensing,” Signal processing, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 549–571, 2006

  21. [21]

    Variable density compressed image sampling,

    Z. Wang and G. R. Arce, “Variable density compressed image sampling,” IEEE transactions on image processing, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 264–270, 2010. 31

  22. [22]

    Performance bounds for grouped incoherent measurements in compressive sensing,

    A. C. Polak, M. F. Duarte, and D. L. Goeckel, “Performance bounds for grouped incoherent measurements in compressive sensing,” IEEE transactions on signal processing, vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 2877–2887, 2015

  23. [23]

    On oracle-type local recovery guarantees in com- pressed sensing,

    B. Adcock, C. Boyer, and S. Brugiapaglia, “On oracle-type local recovery guarantees in com- pressed sensing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.03789 , 2018

  24. [24]

    Compressive sensing and structured random matrices,

    H. Rauhut, “Compressive sensing and structured random matrices,” Theoretical foundations and numerical methods for sparse recovery , vol. 9, pp. 1–92, 2010

  25. [25]

    Uniform recovery in infinite-dimensional compressed sensing and applications to structured binary sampling,

    B. Adcock, V. Antun, and A. C. Hansen, “Uniform recovery in infinite-dimensional compressed sensing and applications to structured binary sampling,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.00126 , 2019

  26. [26]

    A note on compressed sensing of structured sparse wavelet coefficients from subsampled Fourier measurements,

    B. Adcock, A. C. Hansen, and B. Roman, “A note on compressed sensing of structured sparse wavelet coefficients from subsampled Fourier measurements,” IEEE signal processing letters , vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 732–736, 2016

  27. [27]

    Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging,

    M. Lustig, D. Donoho, and J. M. Pauly, “Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the Interna- tional Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1182–1195, 2007

  28. [28]

    Coded-illumination Fourier transform interferometry,

    A. Moshtaghpour, V. Cambareri, K. Degraux, A. C. Gonzalez Gonzalez, M. Roblin, L. Jacques, and P. Antoine, “Coded-illumination Fourier transform interferometry,” in the Golden Jubilee Meeting of the Royal Belgian Society for Microscopy (RBSM) , 2016, pp. 65–66

  29. [29]

    Multilevel illumination coding for Fourier transform inter- ferometry in fluorescence spectroscopy,

    A. Moshtaghpour and L. Jacques, “Multilevel illumination coding for Fourier transform inter- ferometry in fluorescence spectroscopy,” in IEEE International Conference on Image Process- ing (ICIP), 2018, pp. 1433–1437

  30. [30]

    A variable density sampling scheme for compressive Fourier transform interferometry,

    A. Moshtaghpour, L. Jacques, V. Cambareri, P. Antoine, and M. Roblin, “A variable density sampling scheme for compressive Fourier transform interferometry,” SIAM journal on imaging sciences, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 671–715, 2019

  31. [31]

    Compressive hy- perspectral imaging using coded Fourier transform interferometry,

    A. Moshtaghpour, V. Cambareri, L. Jacques, P. Antoine, and M. Roblin, “Compressive hy- perspectral imaging using coded Fourier transform interferometry,” in Signal Processing with Adaptive Sparse Structured Representations workshop (SPARS) , 2017

  32. [32]

    Compressive hyperspectral imaging with Fourier transform interferometry,

    A. Moshtaghpour, K. Degraux, V. Cambareri, A. Gonzalez, M. Roblin, L. Jacques, and P. An- toine, “Compressive hyperspectral imaging with Fourier transform interferometry,” in 3rd In- ternational Traveling Workshop on Interactions between Sparse models and Technology , 2016, pp. 27–29

  33. [33]

    Hyperspectral analysis of normal and malignant colon tissue microarray sections using a novel DMD system,

    G. Davis, M. Maggioni, F. Warner, and F. Geshwind, “Hyperspectral analysis of normal and malignant colon tissue microarray sections using a novel DMD system,” inNIH Optical Imaging Workshop, 2004

  34. [34]

    Lensless imaging by compressive sensing,

    G. Huang, H. Jiang, K. Matthews, and P. Wilford, “Lensless imaging by compressive sensing,” in IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) , 2013, pp. 2101–2105. 32

  35. [35]

    3d single-pixel video,

    Y. Zhang, M. P. Edgar, B. Sun, N. Radwell, G. M. Gibson, and M. J. Padgett, “3d single-pixel video,” Journal of Optics , vol. 18, no. 3, p. 035203, 2016

  36. [36]

    Obic measurements with- out lasers or raster-scanning based on compressive sensing,

    T. Sun, G. Woods, M. F. Duarte, K. Kelly, C. Li, and Y. Zhang, “Obic measurements with- out lasers or raster-scanning based on compressive sensing,” in International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis (ISTFA), San Jose, CA , 2009, pp. 272–277

  37. [37]

    Compressive holography with a single-pixel detector,

    P. Clemente, V. Dur´ an, E. Tajahuerce, P. Andr´ es, V. Climent, and J. Lancis, “Compressive holography with a single-pixel detector,” Optics letters, vol. 38, no. 14, pp. 2524–2527, 2013

  38. [38]

    Hyperspectral imaging using the single-pixel Fourier transform technique,

    S. Jin, W. Hui, Y. Wang, K. Huang, Q. Shi, C. Ying, D. Liu, Q. Ye, W. Zhou, and J. Tian, “Hyperspectral imaging using the single-pixel Fourier transform technique,” Scientific reports, vol. 7, p. 45209, 2017

  39. [39]

    Single- pixel digital holography with phase-encoded illumination,

    L. Mart´ ınez-Le´ on, P. Clemente, Y. Mori, V. Climent, J. Lancis, and E. Tajahuerce, “Single- pixel digital holography with phase-encoded illumination,” Optics express, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 4975–4984, 2017

  40. [40]

    Hadamard single-pixel imaging versus Fourier single-pixel imaging,

    Z. Zhang, X. Wang, G. Zheng, and J. Zhong, “Hadamard single-pixel imaging versus Fourier single-pixel imaging,” Optics Express, vol. 25, no. 16, pp. 19 619–19 639, 2017

  41. [41]

    Application of spatial light modulators for new modalities in spectrometry and imaging,

    R. DeVerse, F. Geshwind, R. Coifman, W. Fateley, and A. Coppi, “Application of spatial light modulators for new modalities in spectrometry and imaging,” Nov. 4 2004, US Patent App. 10/764,113

  42. [42]

    Compressive imaging for video representation and coding,

    M. Wakin, J. N. Laska, M. F. Duarte, D. Baron, S. Sarvotham, D. Takhar, K. F. Kelly, and R. G. Baraniuk, “Compressive imaging for video representation and coding,” inPicture Coding Symposium, vol. 1, 2006, p. 13

  43. [43]

    3d computational imaging with single-pixel detectors,

    B. Sun, M. P. Edgar, R. Bowman, L. E. Vittert, S. Welsh, A. Bowman, and M. Padgett, “3d computational imaging with single-pixel detectors,” Science, vol. 340, no. 6134, pp. 844–847, 2013

  44. [44]

    Single-pixel remote sensing,

    J. Ma, “Single-pixel remote sensing,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters , vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 199–203, 2009

  45. [45]

    A single-pixel terahertz imaging system based on compressed sensing,

    W. L. Chan, K. Charan, D. Takhar, K. F. Kelly, R. G. Baraniuk, and D. M. Mittleman, “A single-pixel terahertz imaging system based on compressed sensing,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 93, no. 12, p. 121105, 2008

  46. [46]

    A new compressive imaging camera architecture using optical-domain compression,

    D. Takhar, J. N. Laska, M. B. Wakin, M. F. Duarte, D. Baron, S. Sarvotham, K. F. Kelly, and R. G. Baraniuk, “A new compressive imaging camera architecture using optical-domain compression,” in Computational Imaging IV , vol. 6065. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2006, p. 606509

  47. [47]

    Coherence estimates between Hadamard matrices and Daubechies wavelets,

    V. Antun, “Coherence estimates between Hadamard matrices and Daubechies wavelets,” Mas- ter’s thesis, 2016

  48. [48]

    Sampling from binary measurements-on reconstructions from Walsh coefficients,

    A. Hansen and L. Terhaar, “Sampling from binary measurements-on reconstructions from Walsh coefficients,” in International Conference on Sampling Theory and Applications (SampTA). IEEE, 2017, pp. 256–260. 33

  49. [49]

    On reconstructions from measure- ments with binary functions,

    R. Calderbank, A. Hansen, B. Roman, and L. Thesing, “On reconstructions from measure- ments with binary functions,” Springer, to appear

  50. [50]

    Relations between Haar and Walsh/Hadamard transforms,

    B. Fino, “Relations between Haar and Walsh/Hadamard transforms,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 647–648, 1972

  51. [51]

    Walsh-like functions and their relations,

    B. Falkowski and S. Rahardja, “Walsh-like functions and their relations,” IEE Proceedings- Vision, Image and Signal Processing , vol. 143, no. 5, pp. 279–284, 1996

  52. [52]

    Compressive imaging using fast transform coding,

    A. Thompson and R. Calderbank, “Compressive imaging using fast transform coding,” in Emerging Imaging and Sensing Technologies , vol. 9992. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2016, p. 99920F

  53. [53]

    The Haar-recursive transform and its consequence to the Walsh-Paley spectrum and the autocorrelation function,

    H. M. Rafiq and M. U. Siddiqi, “The Haar-recursive transform and its consequence to the Walsh-Paley spectrum and the autocorrelation function,” International Journal of Engineering Research and Application, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 46–58, 2016

  54. [54]

    On the stable sampling rate for binary measurements and wavelet reconstruction,

    A. Hansen and L. Thesing, “On the stable sampling rate for binary measurements and wavelet reconstruction,” Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis , 2018

  55. [55]

    Linear reconstructions and the analysis of the stable sampling rate,

    L. Thesing and A. C. Hansen, “Linear reconstructions and the analysis of the stable sampling rate,” vol. 17, pp. 103–126, 2018

  56. [56]

    Non uniform recovery guarantees for binary measurements and wavelet reconstructions,

    L. Thesing and A. Hansen, “Non uniform recovery guarantees for binary measurements and wavelet reconstructions,” to appear

  57. [57]

    Iterative hard thresholding for compressed sensing,

    T. Blumensath and M. E. Davies, “Iterative hard thresholding for compressed sensing,”Applied and computational harmonic analysis , vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 265–274, 2009

  58. [58]

    Sparse recovery with orthogonal matching pursuit under RIP,

    T. Zhang, “Sparse recovery with orthogonal matching pursuit under RIP,” IEEE transactions on information theory , vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 6215–6221, Sep. 2011

  59. [59]

    Sparse representation of a polytope and recovery of sparse signals and low-rank matrices

    T. T. Cai and A. Zhang, “Sparse representation of a polytope and recovery of sparse signals and low-rank matrices.” IEEE transactions on information theory , vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 122–132, 2014

  60. [60]

    Mallat, A wavelet tour of signal processing: the sparse way

    S. Mallat, A wavelet tour of signal processing: the sparse way . Academic press, 2008

  61. [61]

    Wavelets for computer graphics: a primer. 1,

    E. J. Stollnitz, A. DeRose, and D. H. Salesin, “Wavelets for computer graphics: a primer. 1,” IEEE computer graphics and applications , vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 76–84, 1995

  62. [62]

    Fast wavelet transforms and numerical algorithms I,

    G. Beylkin, R. Coifman, and V. Rokhlin, “Fast wavelet transforms and numerical algorithms I,” Communications on pure and applied mathematics , vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 141–183, 1991

  63. [63]

    Wavelet-based transformations for nonlinear signal pro- cessing,

    R. D. Nowak and R. G. Baraniuk, “Wavelet-based transformations for nonlinear signal pro- cessing,” IEEE transactions on signal processing , vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 1852–1865, 1999

  64. [64]

    Image compression through wavelet transform coding,

    R. A. DeVore, B. Jawerth, and B. J. Lucier, “Image compression through wavelet transform coding,” IEEE transactions on information theory , vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 719–746, 1992. 34

  65. [65]

    Wavelet thresholding in anisotropic function classes and application to adaptive estimation of evolutionary spectra,

    M. H. Neumann, R. Von Sachs et al., “Wavelet thresholding in anisotropic function classes and application to adaptive estimation of evolutionary spectra,” The Annals of Statistics , vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 38–76, 1997

  66. [66]

    Resolution d’une question relative aux determinants,

    J. Hadamard, “Resolution d’une question relative aux determinants,” Bulletin des Sciences Math´ ematiques, vol. 2, pp. 240–246, 1893

  67. [67]

    Classification of subfactors: the reduction to commuting squares,

    S. Popa, “Classification of subfactors: the reduction to commuting squares,” Inventiones math- ematicae, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 19–43, 1990

  68. [68]

    Complex Hadamard matrices and the spectral set con- jecture,

    M. N. Kolounzakis and M. Matolcsi, “Complex Hadamard matrices and the spectral set con- jecture,” Collectanea mathematica, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 281–291, 2006

  69. [69]

    J. J. Sylvester, “Thoughts on inverse orthogonal matrices, simultaneous signsuccessions, and tessellated pavements in two or more colours, with applications to newton’s rule, ornamental tile-work, and the theory of numbers,” The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science , vol. 34, no. 232, pp. 461–475, 1867

  70. [70]

    Ordering of Walsh functions,

    L. Zhihua and Z. Qishan, “Ordering of Walsh functions,”IEEE transactions on electromagnetic compatibility, no. 2, pp. 115–119, 1983

  71. [71]

    K. J. Horadam, Hadamard matrices and their applications . Princeton university press, 2012

  72. [72]

    Robust uncertainty principles: Exact signal recon- struction from highly incomplete frequency information,

    E. J. Cand` es, J. Romberg, and T. Tao, “Robust uncertainty principles: Exact signal recon- struction from highly incomplete frequency information,” IEEE transactions on information theory, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 489–509, 2006

  73. [73]

    Probing the pareto frontier for basis pursuit solutions,

    E. Vandenberg and M. P. Friedlander, “Probing the pareto frontier for basis pursuit solutions,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 890–912, 2008

  74. [74]

    SPGL1: A solver for large-scale sparse reconstruction,

    ——, “SPGL1: A solver for large-scale sparse reconstruction,” June 2007, http://www.cs.ubc.ca/labs/scl/spgl1

  75. [75]

    Spot - A Linear-Operator Toolbox,

    “Spot - A Linear-Operator Toolbox,” retrieved on Aug. 25th, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://www.cs.ubc.ca/labs/scl/spot/index.html

  76. [76]

    Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage,

    D. L. Donoho and I. M. Johnstone, “Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage,” bBiometrika, pp. 425–455, 1994

  77. [77]

    The Fourier reconstruction of a head section,

    L. A. Shepp and B. F. Logan, “The Fourier reconstruction of a head section,” IEEE transac- tions on nuclear science , vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 21–43, June 1974

  78. [78]

    Recursive fast algorithm and the role of the tensor product,

    J. Granata, M. Conner, and R. Tolimieri, “Recursive fast algorithm and the role of the tensor product,” IEEE transactions on signal processing , vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 2921–2930, 1992

  79. [79]

    The ubiquitous Kronecker product,

    C. F. Loan, “The ubiquitous Kronecker product,” Journal of Computational and Applied Math- ematics, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 85 – 100, 2000

  80. [80]

    Kronecker products, unitary matrices and signal processing applications,

    P. A. Regalia and M. K. Sanjit, “Kronecker products, unitary matrices and signal processing applications,” SIAM review, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 586–613, 1989. 35

Showing first 80 references.