pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.11108 · v1 · pith:7UAUXOOPnew · submitted 2019-07-25 · ⚛️ physics.space-ph · astro-ph.SR· physics.plasm-ph

Sign singularity of the local energy transfer in space plasma turbulence

Luca Sorriso-Valvo , Gaetano De Vita , Federico Fraternale , Alexandre Gurchumelia , Silvia Perri , Giuseppina Nigro , Filomena Catapano , Alessandro Retin\`o
show 13 more authors
Christopher H. K. Chen Emiliya Yordanova Oreste Pezzi Khatuna Chargazia Oleg Kharshiladze Diana Kvaratskhelia Christian L. Vasconez Raffaele Marino Olivier Le Contel Barbara Giles Thomas E. Moore Roy B. Torbert James L. Burch
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 15:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.space-ph astro-ph.SRphysics.plasm-ph
keywords space plasma turbulencelocal energy transfersign singularity analysisMHD turbulencecross-helicity transferfractal propertiesAlfvénic fluctuationsthird-order moment scaling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Local energy and cross-helicity transfers exhibit similar scaling properties in space plasma turbulence.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the scaling properties of local energy transfer in weakly collisional space plasmas using a proxy derived from the third-order moment scaling law for magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. By applying sign-singularity analysis to the alternating positive and negative energy fluxes, it reveals the complex geometrical nature of these fluxes across different types of fluctuations. The analysis demonstrates that the local contributions from energy and cross-helicity nonlinear transfers have comparable scaling properties. This leads to the conclusion that current and vorticity structures share fractal properties with Alfvénic fluctuations. Such findings help clarify how turbulent energy cascades to small scales where kinetic dissipation occurs.

Core claim

Using a proxy for the local energy transfer based on the third-order moment scaling law for MHD turbulence, the sign-singularity analysis shows that the local contributions associated with energy and cross-helicity nonlinear transfer have similar scaling properties. Consequently, the fractal properties of current and vorticity structures are similar to those of the Alfvénic fluctuations. The results highlight the highly complex geometrical nature of the flux in space plasma turbulence.

What carries the argument

Sign-singularity analysis applied to the proxy of local energy transfer from the third-order moment scaling law for MHD turbulence to compare energy and cross-helicity channels.

If this is right

  • The scaling properties inform the structure and topology of energy fluxes for different fluctuation types.
  • The fractal properties of current and vorticity structures are similar to those of the Alfvénic fluctuations.
  • Understanding these properties aids in characterizing the dissipative mechanisms triggered by different fluctuations at small scales.
  • The complex geometrical nature of the energy flux is revealed through the alternating positive-negative contributions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This similarity suggests that models of MHD turbulence can use unified fractal descriptions for these structures.
  • The method could be applied to other turbulent plasma systems to check if the scaling similarity holds generally.
  • If confirmed, it may help identify locations of energy dissipation in observed space plasma data.
  • Connections to kinetic processes at small scales could be explored by linking these scalings to specific dissipation mechanisms.

Load-bearing premise

The third-order moment scaling law for MHD turbulence provides an accurate proxy for the actual local energy transfer rate in weakly collisional space plasmas.

What would settle it

A measurement in space plasma turbulence data showing significantly different scaling properties between the local energy transfer and cross-helicity transfer, or a direct calculation of local energy transfer that does not match the third-order moment proxy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.11108 by Alessandro Retin\`o, Alexandre Gurchumelia, Barbara Giles, Christian L. Vasconez, Christopher H. K. Chen, Diana Kvaratskhelia, Emiliya Yordanova, Federico Fraternale, Filomena Catapano, Gaetano De Vita, Giuseppina Nigro, James L. Burch, Khatuna Chargazia, Luca Sorriso-Valvo, Oleg Kharshiladze, Olivier Le Contel, Oreste Pezzi, Raffaele Marino, Roy B. Torbert, Silvia Perri, Thomas E. Moore.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Magnetic components spectral power density for the t [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Scale-dependent kurtosis of the magnetic field compo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The Politano-Pouquet law (1) for the three samples, i [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The local proxy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Top row: the cancellation function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In weakly collisional space plasmas, the turbulent cascade provides most of the energy that is dissipated at small scales by various kinetic processes. Understanding the characteristics of such dissipative mechanisms requires the accurate knowledge of the fluctuations that make energy available for conversion at small scales, as different dissipation processes are triggered by fluctuations of a different nature. The scaling properties of different energy channels are estimated here using a proxy of the local energy transfer, based on the third-order moment scaling law for magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. In particular, the sign-singularity analysis was used to explore the scaling properties of the alternating positive-negative energy fluxes, thus providing information on the structure and topology of such fluxes for each of the different type of fluctuations. The results show the highly complex geometrical nature of the flux, and that the local contributions associated with energy and cross-helicity nonlinear transfer have similar scaling properties. Consequently, the fractal properties of current and vorticity structures are similar to those of the Alfv\'enic fluctuations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies a sign-singularity analysis to a local proxy for energy transfer derived from the Politano-Pouquet third-order moment scaling law of incompressible MHD. It reports that the alternating positive-negative fluxes associated with energy and cross-helicity nonlinear transfers exhibit similar scaling properties, from which it concludes that the fractal properties of current and vorticity structures are similar to those of Alfvénic fluctuations in weakly collisional space plasmas.

Significance. If the local-proxy assumption holds, the work would supply quantitative information on the geometrical complexity and topological similarity of different energy channels in the turbulent cascade, with potential implications for identifying which fluctuations feed kinetic dissipation. The sign-singularity technique itself is a useful diagnostic for intermittent flux structures.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Methods] The central claim rests on treating the ensemble-averaged Politano-Pouquet third-order relation as a pointwise proxy for instantaneous local energy transfer. This step is invoked in the abstract and is load-bearing for all subsequent scaling results; however, the relation is exact only for incompressible MHD under ensemble averaging, and its local accuracy in compressible, weakly collisional, kinetic plasmas is not independently validated.
  2. [Results / Discussion] No quantitative assessment is provided of the errors introduced by non-MHD terms, non-local contributions, or the distinction between averaged flux and local transfer when the proxy is evaluated inside the sign-singularity procedure. This omission directly affects the robustness of the reported similarity between energy and cross-helicity scaling exponents.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Notation for the local proxy (e.g., the precise combination of velocity and magnetic-field increments) should be written explicitly with equation numbers rather than described only in prose.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions should state the exact time intervals, spacecraft, and plasma-parameter ranges used for each data set so that the sign-singularity exponents can be reproduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The comments highlight important limitations of the proxy approach, which we address below. We will revise the manuscript to clarify assumptions and add discussion of caveats while maintaining the core analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Methods] The central claim rests on treating the ensemble-averaged Politano-Pouquet third-order relation as a pointwise proxy for instantaneous local energy transfer. This step is invoked in the abstract and is load-bearing for all subsequent scaling results; however, the relation is exact only for incompressible MHD under ensemble averaging, and its local accuracy in compressible, weakly collisional, kinetic plasmas is not independently validated.

    Authors: We agree that the Politano-Pouquet relation holds exactly only under ensemble averaging for incompressible MHD. The manuscript explicitly presents the expression as a proxy for local transfer (see abstract and Section 2), following its prior use in solar-wind studies. We do not claim pointwise validity in the kinetic regime. In revision we will (i) rephrase the abstract to emphasize the proxy character, (ii) add a dedicated paragraph in Methods citing supporting literature on its application to spacecraft data, and (iii) note the absence of direct local validation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results / Discussion] No quantitative assessment is provided of the errors introduced by non-MHD terms, non-local contributions, or the distinction between averaged flux and local transfer when the proxy is evaluated inside the sign-singularity procedure. This omission directly affects the robustness of the reported similarity between energy and cross-helicity scaling exponents.

    Authors: A quantitative error budget would indeed require controlled kinetic simulations or multi-spacecraft comparisons that lie outside the present observational analysis. We will therefore add a qualitative discussion paragraph in the revised Results/Discussion section that enumerates the main sources of uncertainty (compressibility, non-locality, averaging vs. instantaneous distinction) and states that the reported similarity of scaling exponents is obtained within the adopted proxy framework. This addition will temper the interpretation without altering the numerical results. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper applies the established Politano-Pouquet third-order moment scaling law (an external MHD result) as a proxy to estimate local energy transfer rates from observational data, then performs sign-singularity analysis on the resulting proxy fields to compare scaling properties of energy versus cross-helicity nonlinear transfers. This is a data-driven observational study whose central empirical findings on similar scaling and fractal properties emerge from the spacecraft measurements rather than being imposed by construction, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation. No equations or steps reduce the reported results to fitted inputs renamed as predictions or to ansatzes smuggled via the authors' own prior work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; the ledger is therefore incomplete and limited to elements explicitly named in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The third-order moment scaling law for MHD turbulence supplies a valid proxy for local energy transfer in weakly collisional space plasmas.
    Explicitly invoked to define the proxy used throughout the analysis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5807 in / 1186 out tokens · 25217 ms · 2026-05-24T15:45:47.116534+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 94 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    was ro- bustly observed in numerical simulations [44–46], in the solar wind plasma [47–51], and in the terrestrial magne- tosheath [52–54]. In order to attempt a description of the local energy flux from space data time series, the law ( 1) can be revisited without computing the average, thus giv- ing a time series of the heuristic proxy of the local energ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    are suppressed by averaging over a large sample, and therefore provides only a rough approxima- tion of the actual local energy transfer rate [38, 55]. How- ever, because of the intrinsic difficulty in estimating the neglected terms from one-dimensional data, this proxy can be used as a first degree approximation in space plas- mas time series. The LET was p...

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    The resulting scaling functions are shown in Figure 3 for the three intervals

    can be estimated in the samples under study, both in terms of total energy transfer ⟨ε⟩, and in terms of the averaged components ⟨εe⟩ and ⟨εc⟩. The resulting scaling functions are shown in Figure 3 for the three intervals. None of the observed cases display a clear linear scaling. This might be due to the violation of the several requirements necessary fo...

    work page

  4. [4]

    The proxy has the typical behavior of in- termittent dissipation in turbulence [1], with the presence of intense bursts of energy flux alternating with quieter regions

    In this work we will use the LET at scale of 1 .2 s, which is still inside and near the bottom of the MHD inertial range, where the Politano-Pouquet law is valid [29]. The proxy has the typical behavior of in- termittent dissipation in turbulence [1], with the presence of intense bursts of energy flux alternating with quieter regions. The cancellation anal...

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    The French LPP involvement for the SCM instrument on MMS was supported by CNRS and CNES

    SP has received funding from the European Unions Hori- zon 2020 Research and Innovation programme under grant agreement No 776262 (AIDA, www.aida-space.eu). The French LPP involvement for the SCM instrument on MMS was supported by CNRS and CNES. MMS data are available at the MMS Science Data Center (https://lasp.colorado.edu/mms/sdc). Wind data are availa...

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Kolmogorov

    Frisch UP, Turbulence: the legacy of A.N. Kolmogorov . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (1995)

    work page 1995

  7. [7]

    Intermittency, non-Gaussian statistics and fractal scaling of MHD fluctuations in the solar wind

    Marsch E and Tu C-Y. Intermittency, non-Gaussian statistics and fractal scaling of MHD fluctuations in the solar wind. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics (1997) 4:101

    work page 1997

  8. [8]

    The solar wind as a turbulence laboratory

    Bruno R and Carbone V. The solar wind as a turbulence laboratory. Living Reviews in Solar Physics (2013) 10:1

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    Mag- netospheric Multiscale Observations of Turbulence in the Magnetosheath on Kinetic Scales

    Macek W M, Krasi´ nska A, Silveira M V D, Sibeck D G, Wawrzaszek A, Burch J L, and Russell C T. Mag- netospheric Multiscale Observations of Turbulence in the Magnetosheath on Kinetic Scales. The Astrophysics Journal Letters (2018) 864:L29

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Nature of Kinetic Scale Tur- bulence in the Earth’s Magnetosheath

    Chen C H K and Boldyrev S. Nature of Kinetic Scale Tur- bulence in the Earth’s Magnetosheath. The Astrophysics Journal Letters (2017) 842:122

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Identification of Kinetic Alfv´ en Wave Turbulence in the Solar Wind

    Salem CS, Howes GG, Sundkvist D, Bale SD, Chas- ton CC, Chen CHK, Mozer FS. Identification of Kinetic Alfv´ en Wave Turbulence in the Solar Wind. The Astro- physical Journal Letters (2012) 745:L9 8

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    Whistler Turbulence Forward Cascade versus Inverse Cascade: Three- dimensional Particle-in-cell Simulations

    Chang CS, Gary SP, Wang J. Whistler Turbulence Forward Cascade versus Inverse Cascade: Three- dimensional Particle-in-cell Simulations. The Astrophys- ical Journal (2015) 800:87

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    Recent progress in astrophysical plasma tur- bulence from solar wind observations

    Chen CHK. Recent progress in astrophysical plasma tur- bulence from solar wind observations. Journal of Plasma Physics (2016) 82:535820602

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Collisional Relaxation of Fine Velocity Structures in Plasmas

    Pezzi O, Valentini F, Veltri P. Collisional Relaxation of Fine Velocity Structures in Plasmas. Physical Review Let- ters (2016) 116:145001

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Solar wind collisional heating

    Pezzi O. Solar wind collisional heating. Journal of Plasma Physics (2017) 83:555830301

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Evidence for elec- tron Landau damping in space plasma turbulence

    Chen CHK, Klein KG and Howes GG. Evidence for elec- tron Landau damping in space plasma turbulence. Nature Communications (2019) 10:740

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    The Cluster mission

    Escoubet CP, Fehringer M, and Goldstein M. The Cluster mission. Annales Geophysicae (2001). 19:1197

    work page 2001

  18. [18]

    Magne- tospheric Multiscale Overview and Science Objectives

    Burch JL, Moore TE, Torbert RB, Giles BL. Magne- tospheric Multiscale Overview and Science Objectives. Space Science Reviews (2016) 199:5

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    The Complex Structure of Magnetic Field Discontinuities in the Turbulent Solar Wind

    Greco A, Perri S, Servidio S, Yordanova E, and Veltri P. The Complex Structure of Magnetic Field Discontinuities in the Turbulent Solar Wind. The Astrophysical Journal Letters (2016) 823:L39

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    Coherent structures, inter- mittent turbulence, and dissipation in high-temperature plasmas

    Karimabadi H, Roytershteyn V, Wan M, Matthaeus WH, Daughton W, Wu P, et al. Coherent structures, inter- mittent turbulence, and dissipation in high-temperature plasmas. Physics of Plasmas (2013) 20:012303

    work page 2013

  21. [21]

    Hybrid Vlasov-Maxwell simulations of two-dimensional turbulence in plasmas

    Valentini F, Servidio S, Perrone D, Califano F, Matthaeus WH and Veltri P. Hybrid Vlasov-Maxwell simulations of two-dimensional turbulence in plasmas. Physics of Plasmas (2014) 21:082307

    work page 2014

  22. [22]

    Solar Wind Turbulence from MHD to Sub-ion Scales: High-resolution Hybrid Simulations

    Franci L, Verdini A, Matteini L, Landi S, Hellinger P. Solar Wind Turbulence from MHD to Sub-ion Scales: High-resolution Hybrid Simulations. The Astrophys. J. Lett. (2015) 804:L39

    work page 2015

  23. [23]

    A kinetic model of plasma turbulence

    Servidio S, Valentini F, Perrone D, Greco A, Califano F, Matthaeus WH and Veltri P. A kinetic model of plasma turbulence. Journal of Plasma Physics (2015) 81:325810107

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Differential kinetic dynamics and heat- ing of ions in the turbulent solar wind

    Valentini F, Perrone D, Stabile S, Pezzi O, Servidio S, De Marco R et al. Differential kinetic dynamics and heat- ing of ions in the turbulent solar wind. New Journal of Physics (2016) 18:125001

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Kinetic Cascade in Solar-wind Turbulence: 3D3V Hybrid-kinetic Simula- tions with Electron Inertia

    Cerri SS, Servidio S, Califano F. Kinetic Cascade in Solar-wind Turbulence: 3D3V Hybrid-kinetic Simula- tions with Electron Inertia. The Astrophysical Journal (2017) 846:L18

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Groselj D., Cerri S.S., Navarro A.B., Willmott C., Told D., Loureiro N.L. et al. Fully Kinetic versus Reduced- kinetic Modeling of Collisionless Plasma Turbulence. he Astrophysical Journal (2017) 847:28

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    Solar Wind Turbulent Cascade from MHD to Sub-ion Scales: Large-size 3D Hybrid Particle-in-cell Simulation s

    Franci L, Landi S,Verdini A, Matteini L, Hellinger P. Solar Wind Turbulent Cascade from MHD to Sub-ion Scales: Large-size 3D Hybrid Particle-in-cell Simulation s. The Astrophys. J. (2018) 853:26

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Velocity-space cascade in mag- netized plasmas: Numerical simulations

    Pezzi O, Servidio S, Perrone D, Valentini F, Sorriso- Valvo L, Greco A, et al. Velocity-space cascade in mag- netized plasmas: Numerical simulations. Physics of Plas- mas (2018) 25:060704

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Fluid simulations of plasma turbu- lence at ion scales: Comparison with Vlasov-Maxwell simulations

    Perrone D, Passot T, Laveder D, Valentini F, Sulem PL, Zouganelis I, et al. Fluid simulations of plasma turbu- lence at ion scales: Comparison with Vlasov-Maxwell simulations. Physics of Plasmas (2018) 25:052302

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Phase mixing versus nonlinear advection in drift-kinetic plasma turbulence

    Schekochihin AA, Parker JT, Highcock EG, Dellar PJ, Dorland W, and Hammett GW. Phase mixing versus nonlinear advection in drift-kinetic plasma turbulence. Journal of Plasma Physics (2016) 82: 905820212

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    Magnetospheric multi- scale observation of plasma velocity-space cascade: Her- mite representation and theory

    Servidio S, Chasapis A, Matthaeus WH, Perrone D, Valentini F, Parashar TN, et al. Magnetospheric multi- scale observation of plasma velocity-space cascade: Her- mite representation and theory. Physical Review Letters (2017) 119:205101

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    On the statistical properties of turbu- lent energy transfer rate in the inner heliosphere

    Sorriso-Valvo L, Carbone F, Perri S, Greco A, Marino R and Bruno R. On the statistical properties of turbu- lent energy transfer rate in the inner heliosphere. Solar Physics (2018) 293:10

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    Measuring collisionless damp- ing in heliospheric plasmas using field-particle correla- tions

    Klein KG and Howes GG. Measuring collisionless damp- ing in heliospheric plasmas using field-particle correla- tions. The Astrophysical Journal Letters (2016) 826:L30

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    Turbulence-Driven Ion Beams in the Magnetospheric Kelvin-Helmholtz Insta- bility

    Sorriso-Valvo L, Catapano F, Retin` o, Le Contel O, Perrone D, Roberts OW, et al. Turbulence-Driven Ion Beams in the Magnetospheric Kelvin-Helmholtz Insta- bility. Physical Review Letters (2019) 122:035102

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    Kinetic signatures and Intermittent turbulence in the solar wind plasma

    Osman KT, Matthaeus WH, Hnat B and Chapman SC. Kinetic signatures and Intermittent turbulence in the solar wind plasma. Physical Review Letters (2012) 108:261103

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    Local ki- netic effects in two-dimensional plasma turbulence

    Servidio S, Valentini F, Califano F and Veltri P. Local ki- netic effects in two-dimensional plasma turbulence. Phys- ical Review Letters (2012) 108:045001

    work page 2012

  37. [37]

    L., Pucci F., Valentini F., Servidio S., Matthaeus W

    V´ asconez C. L., Pucci F., Valentini F., Servidio S., Matthaeus W. H. and Malara F. Kinetic Alfv´ en wave generation by large-scale phase mixing. The Astrophysi- cal Journal (2015) 815:1

    work page 2015

  38. [38]

    L., Pezzi O., Servidio S., Valen- tini F., Matthaeus W

    Pucci F., V´ asconez C. L., Pezzi O., Servidio S., Valen- tini F., Matthaeus W. H. and Malara F. From Alfv´ en waves to kinetic Alfv´ en waves in an inhomogeneous equi- librium structure. J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics (2016) 121:1024

    work page 2016

  39. [39]

    L., Pezzi O., Servidio S., Malara F

    Valentini F., V´ asconez C. L., Pezzi O., Servidio S., Malara F. and Pucci F. Transition to kinetic turbulence at proton scales driven by large-amplitude kinetic Alfv´ en fluctuations. Astronomy & Astrophysics (2017) 599:A8

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    Local energy transfer rate and kinetic processes: the fate of turbulent energy in two-dimensional hybrid Vlasov-Maxwell numerical simu- lations

    Sorriso-Valvo L, Perrone D, Pezzi O, Valentini F, Ser- vidio S, Zouganelis I, and Veltri P. Local energy transfer rate and kinetic processes: the fate of turbulent energy in two-dimensional hybrid Vlasov-Maxwell numerical simu- lations. Journal of Plasma Physics (2018) 84:725840201

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Coherent Structures and Spectral Energy Transfer in Turbulent Plasma: A Space-Filter Approach

    Camporeale E, Sorriso-Valvo L, Califano F, and Retin` o A. Coherent Structures and Spectral Energy Transfer in Turbulent Plasma: A Space-Filter Approach. Physical Review Letters (2018) 120:125101

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    Scale dependence of energy transfer in turbulent plasma

    Yang Y, Wan M, Matthaeus WH, Sorriso-Valvo L, Parashar TN, Lu Q, et al. Scale dependence of energy transfer in turbulent plasma. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2019) 482:4933

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Local ap- proach to the study of energy transfers in incompress- ible magnetohydrodynamic turbulence

    Kuzzay D, Alexandrova O, and Matteini L. Local ap- proach to the study of energy transfers in incompress- ible magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. Physical Review E (2019) 99:053202

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Wavelet transfroms and their applications to turbulence

    Farge M. Wavelet transfroms and their applications to turbulence. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics (1992) 24:395

    work page 1992

  45. [45]

    Intermittent MHD structures and classi- cal discontinuities

    Greco A, Chuychai P, Matthaeus WH, Servidio S and Dimitruk P. Intermittent MHD structures and classi- cal discontinuities. Geophysical Research Letters (2008) 35:L19111 9

    work page 2008

  46. [46]

    Dynamical length scales for turbulent magnetized flows

    Politano H and Pouquet A. Dynamical length scales for turbulent magnetized flows. Geophysical Research Letters (1998) 25:273

    work page 1998

  47. [47]

    Computational Methods for Fluid Flow , New York, NY: Springer (1986)

    Peyret R and Taylor TD. Computational Methods for Fluid Flow , New York, NY: Springer (1986)

    work page 1986

  48. [48]

    Numer- ical Study on the Validity of the Taylor Hypothesis in Space Plasmas

    Perri S, Servidio S, Vaivads A, and Valentini F. Numer- ical Study on the Validity of the Taylor Hypothesis in Space Plasmas. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (2017) 231:4

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    Analysis of cancellation in two- dimensional magnetohydrodynamic turbulence

    Sorriso-Valvo L, Carbone V, Noullez A, Politano H, Pou- quet A and Veltri P. Analysis of cancellation in two- dimensional magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. Physics of Plasmas (2002) 9:89

    work page 2002

  50. [50]

    Exact law for homo- geneous compressible Hall magnetohydrodynamics tur- bulence

    Andr´ es N, Galtier S, and Sahraoui F. Exact law for homo- geneous compressible Hall magnetohydrodynamics tur- bulence. Physical Review E (2018) 97:013204

    work page 2018

  51. [51]

    On exact laws in incompressible Hall magnetohydrodyncamic turbulence

    Ferrand R, Galtier S, Sahraoui F, Meyrand R, Andr´ es N, and Banerjee S. On exact laws in incompressible Hall magnetohydrodyncamic turbulence. arXiv:1905.06110v1 (2019)

    work page arXiv 1905

  52. [52]

    Turbulence and Third Moment of Fluctuations: Kolmogorov’s 4/5 Law and its MHD Analogues in the Solar Wind

    MacBride BT, Forman MA and Smith CW. Turbulence and Third Moment of Fluctuations: Kolmogorov’s 4/5 Law and its MHD Analogues in the Solar Wind. In: Fleck B, Zurbuchen TH, Lacoste H, editors. Solar Wind 11/SOHO 16, Connecting Sun and Heliosphere. ESA Special Publication, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 592 (2005). p. 613

    work page 2005

  53. [53]

    Observation of inertial energy cas- cade in interplanetary space plasma

    Sorriso-Valvo L, Marino R, Carbone V, Noullez A, Lep- reti F, Veltri P, et al. Observation of inertial energy cas- cade in interplanetary space plasma. Physical Review Let- ters (2007) 99:115001

    work page 2007

  54. [54]

    Heating the solar wind by a mag- netohydrodynamic turbulent energy cascade

    Marino R, Sorriso-Valvo L, Carbone V, Noullez A, Bruno R and Bavassano B. Heating the solar wind by a mag- netohydrodynamic turbulent energy cascade. The Astro- physical Journal Letters (2008) 667:L71

    work page 2008

  55. [55]

    The turbulent cascade and proton heating in the solar wind during solar minimum

    Coburn JT, Smith CW, Vasquez BJ, Stawarz JE and For- man MA. The turbulent cascade and proton heating in the solar wind during solar minimum. The Astrophysical Journal (2012) 754:93

    work page 2012

  56. [56]

    Scal- ing of Compressible Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence in the Fast Solar Wind

    Banerjee S, Hadid LZ, Sahraoui F and Galtier S. Scal- ing of Compressible Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence in the Fast Solar Wind. The Astrophysical Journal Let- ters (2016) 829:L27

    work page 2016

  57. [57]

    Compressible Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence in the Earths Magnetosheath: Estimation of the Energy Cas- cade Rate Using in situ Spacecraft Data

    Hadid LZ, Sahraoui F, Galtier S and Huang SY. Compressible Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence in the Earths Magnetosheath: Estimation of the Energy Cas- cade Rate Using in situ Spacecraft Data. Physical Review Letters (2018) 120:055102

    work page 2018

  58. [58]

    Solar Wind Tur- bulence Studies Using MMS Fast Plasma Investigation Data

    Bandyopadhyay R, Chasapis A, Chhiber R, Parashar TN, Maruca BA, Matthaeus WH, et al. Solar Wind Tur- bulence Studies Using MMS Fast Plasma Investigation Data. The Astrophysical Journal (2018) 866:81

    work page 2018

  59. [59]

    Incompressive En- ergy Transfer in the Earth’s Magnetosheath: Magneto- spheric Multiscale Observations

    Bandyopadhyay R, Chasapis A, Chhiber R, Parashar TN, Matthaeus WH, Shay MA, et al. Incompressive En- ergy Transfer in the Earth’s Magnetosheath: Magneto- spheric Multiscale Observations. The Astrophysical Jour- nal (2018) 866:106

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    von K´ arm´ anHowarth Equation for Hall Magnetohydro- dynamics: Hybrid Simulations

    Hellinger P, Verdini A, Landi S, Franci L, and Matteini L. von K´ arm´ anHowarth Equation for Hall Magnetohydro- dynamics: Hybrid Simulations. The Astrophysical Jour- nal Letters (2018) 857:L19

    work page 2018

  61. [61]

    Energy fluxes and shell-to-shell transfers in three-dimensional decayi ng magnetohydrodynamic turbulence

    Debliquy O, Verma M K, and Carati D. Energy fluxes and shell-to-shell transfers in three-dimensional decayi ng magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. Phys. Plasmas (2005) 12:042309

    work page 2005

  62. [62]

    Disentangling the triadic interac- tions in Navier-Stokes equations

    Sahoo G and Biferale L. Disentangling the triadic interac- tions in Navier-Stokes equations. The European Physical Journal E (2015) 38:114

    work page 2015

  63. [63]

    Inverse cascades in rotating stratified turbulence: Fast growth of large scales

    Marino R, Mininni P D, Rosenberg D, and Pouquet A. Inverse cascades in rotating stratified turbulence: Fast growth of large scales. EPL (Europhys. Lett.) (2013) 102:44006

    work page 2013

  64. [64]

    A numerical study of the nonlinear cascade of energy in magnetohydrodynamic turbulence

    Verma M K, Roberts D A, Goldstein M L, Ghosh S, and Stribling W T. A numerical study of the nonlinear cascade of energy in magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. J. Geophys. Res. (1996) 101:21619

    work page 1996

  65. [65]

    Energy transfer in two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic turbulence: for- malism and numerical results

    Dar G, Verma M K, and Eswaran V. Energy transfer in two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic turbulence: for- malism and numerical results. Physica D (2001) 157:207

    work page 2001

  66. [66]

    Sign- singular measures: Fast magnetic dynamos, and high- Reynolds-number fluid turbulence

    Ott E, Du Y, Sreenivasan KR, Juneja A, Suri AK. Sign- singular measures: Fast magnetic dynamos, and high- Reynolds-number fluid turbulence. Physical Review Let- ters (1992) 69:2654

    work page 1992

  67. [67]

    Cancellation exponent and multifractal structure in two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamics: Direct numerical simulations and Lagrangian averaged modeling

    Graham J, Mininni PD, and Pouquet A. Cancellation exponent and multifractal structure in two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamics: Direct numerical simulations and Lagrangian averaged modeling. Physical Review E (2005) 72:045301

    work page 2005

  68. [68]

    Cancellation prop- erties in Hall magnetohydrodynamics with a strong guide magnetic field

    Martin LN, De Vita G, Sorriso-Valvo L, Dimitruck P, Ni- gro G, Primavera L, and Carbone V. Cancellation prop- erties in Hall magnetohydrodynamics with a strong guide magnetic field. Physical Review E (2013) 88:063107

    work page 2013

  69. [69]

    Analysis of cancel- lation exponents in two-dimensional Vlasov turbulence

    De Vita G, Sorriso-Valvo L, Valentini F, Servidio S, Pri- mavera L, Carbone V, and Veltri P. Analysis of cancel- lation exponents in two-dimensional Vlasov turbulence. Physics of Plasmas (2014) 21:072315

    work page 2014

  70. [70]

    Three-dimensional simulations of sheared current sheets: transition to turbulence? Journal of Plasma Physics (2017) 83:705830104

    Gingell I, Sorriso-Valvo L, Burgess D, De Vita G, and Matteini L. Three-dimensional simulations of sheared current sheets: transition to turbulence? Journal of Plasma Physics (2017) 83:705830104

    work page 2017

  71. [71]

    Sign- singularity of the current helicity in solar active regions

    Abramenko V, Yurchyshyn VB, and Carbone V. Sign- singularity of the current helicity in solar active regions . Solar Physics (1998) 178:35

    work page 1998

  72. [72]

    Topological changes of the photospheric magnetic field inside active regions: A prelude to flares? Planetary and Space Science (2004) 52:937

    Sorriso-Valvo L, Carbone V, Veltri P, Abramenko V, Noullez A, Politano H, Pouquet A, and Yurchyshyn V. Topological changes of the photospheric magnetic field inside active regions: A prelude to flares? Planetary and Space Science (2004) 52:937

    work page 2004

  73. [73]

    Sign Singularity and Flares in Solar Active Region NOAA 11158

    Sorriso-Valvo L, De Vita G, Kazachenko MD, Krucker S, Primavera L, Servidio S, et al. Sign Singularity and Flares in Solar Active Region NOAA 11158. The Astrophysical Journal (2015) 801:36

    work page 2015

  74. [74]

    Can- cellation analysis of current density in solar active regio n NOAA10019

    De Vita G, Vecchio A, Sorriso-Valvo L, Briand C, Pri- mavera L, Servidio S, Lepreti F, and Carbone V. Can- cellation analysis of current density in solar active regio n NOAA10019. Journal of Space Weather and Space Cli- mate (2015) 5:A28

    work page 2015

  75. [75]

    The Global Geospace Science Pro- gram and its investigations

    Acu˜ na MH, Ogilvie KW, Baker DN, Curtis SA, Fairfield DH, and Mish WH. The Global Geospace Science Pro- gram and its investigations. Space Science Reviews (1995) 71:5

    work page 1995

  76. [76]

    Observations of turbulence in a KelvinHelmholtz event on 8 September 2015 by the Mag- netospheric Multiscale mission

    Stawarz JE, Eriksson S, Wilder FD, Ergun RE, Schwartz SJ, Pouquet A, et al. Observations of turbulence in a KelvinHelmholtz event on 8 September 2015 by the Mag- netospheric Multiscale mission. Journal of Geophysical Research, Space Physics (2016) 121:11021

    work page 2015

  77. [77]

    Magnetospheric Multiscale obser- 10 vations of magnetic reconnection associated with Kelv- inHelmholtz waves

    Eriksson S, Lavraud B, Wilder FD, Stawarz JE, Giles BL, Burch JL, et al. Magnetospheric Multiscale obser- 10 vations of magnetic reconnection associated with Kelv- inHelmholtz waves. Geophysical Research Letters (2016) 43:5606

    work page 2016

  78. [78]

    Electron scale structures and magnetic reconnection signatures in the turbulent mag- netosheath

    Yordanova E, V¨ or¨ os Z, Varsani A, Graham DB, Norgren C, Khotyaintsev YuV, et al. Electron scale structures and magnetic reconnection signatures in the turbulent mag- netosheath. Geophysical Research Letters (2016) 43:5969

    work page 2016

  79. [79]

    MMS Observation of Magnetic Reconnection in the Turbulent Magnetosheath

    V¨ or¨ os Z, Yordanova E, Varsani A, Genestreti KJ, Khotyaintsev YuV, Li W, et al. MMS Observation of Magnetic Reconnection in the Turbulent Magnetosheath. Journal of Geophysical Research, Space Physics (2017) 122:11442

    work page 2017

  80. [80]

    Geoscientific Instrumation Meth- ods Data Systems (2016) 5:521

    Fischer D, Magnes W, Hagen C, Dors I, Chutter MW, Needell J, et al., Optimized merging of search coil and fluxgate data for MMS. Geoscientific Instrumation Meth- ods Data Systems (2016) 5:521

    work page 2016

Showing first 80 references.