pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.11296 · v1 · pith:5T2ORIBOnew · submitted 2019-07-25 · 🪐 quant-ph

Implementing positive-operator-valued-measurement elements in photonic circuits for performing minimum quantum state tomography of path qudits

W. R. Cardoso , D. F. Barros , M. R. Barros , S. P\'adua This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 16:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum state tomographypath quditsphotonic circuitsPOVMminimum tomographyNaimark theoremequidistant statesintegrated optics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Symmetric POVM elements defined by equidistant states yield compact photonic circuits for minimum tomography of path qudits of any dimension.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops photonic circuits that realize the POVM elements needed for minimum quantum state tomography of path-encoded qudits. Equidistant states are used to define those POVM elements, and the symmetries of the resulting operators are exploited to fix the transmittances, reflectivities, and phases of beam splitters and phase shifters via Naimark's theorem. The construction produces a general recipe that applies unchanged to qudits of arbitrary dimension and produces smaller interferometers than earlier designs. If the calculated parameters can be realized, high-dimensional path states become easier to characterize in integrated optics without needing larger or dimension-specific hardware.

Core claim

Equidistant states allow the POVM elements for minimum tomography to be defined so that their symmetries directly determine a set of beam-splitter and phase-shifter parameters; when these parameters are obtained from probability operators in an extended Hilbert space and Naimark's theorem, the resulting circuit performs the tomography for any qudit dimension and is smaller than circuits obtained by previously published methods.

What carries the argument

Symmetric POVM elements constructed from equidistant states, whose probability operators in an extended Hilbert space fix the transmittances and reflectivities of the beam splitters via Naimark's theorem.

If this is right

  • The same parameter-determination procedure works for qudits of every dimension without redesign of the symmetry arguments.
  • The interferometers required are smaller than those produced by other known minimum-tomography schemes.
  • All circuit constituents (beam-splitter ratios and phase shifts) are fixed once the equidistant POVM elements are chosen.
  • The approach extends the use of integrated optics to the characterization of high-dimensional path states transmitted through fibers.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The size reduction may allow multiple such tomography stages to be placed on a single chip for sequential or parallel measurements.
  • If the equidistant-state construction can be adapted to other degrees of freedom, similar compact circuits might be designed for polarization or time-bin qudits.
  • Experimental tests could begin with a qutrit version and measure the actual statistical errors introduced by non-ideal beam splitters.
  • The method supplies an explicit mapping from abstract POVM symmetries to concrete optical parameters that other tomography proposals could adopt.

Load-bearing premise

The transmittances and reflectivities obtained from the extended-Hilbert-space probability operators can be physically realized by beam splitters and phase shifters without significant loss or fabrication error.

What would settle it

Build the circuit for a qutrit according to the calculated parameters, prepare known input states, perform the measurements, and reconstruct the density matrix; if the average fidelity with the prepared states falls significantly below the value expected from ideal minimum tomography, the implementation does not work as claimed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.11296 by D. F. Barros, M. R. Barros, S. P\'adua, W. R. Cardoso.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Circuit proposal for the realization of the minimal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Circuit representation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Schematic drawing showing the quantum operations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Circuit representation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Manipulation of qudits in optical tables is a difficult and nonscalable task. The use of integrated optical circuits opens new possibilities for the generation, manipulation, and characterization of high dimensional states besides the ease of transmission of these states through an optical fiber. In this work we propose photonic circuits to perform minimum quantum state tomography of path qudits and show how to determine all the constituents parameters of these circuits (beam splitters and phase shifters). Our strategies were based on the symmetries of the involved POVMs (positive operator-valued measures) suggested for minimum tomography and allowed us to obtain interferometers smaller than those obtained by other already known methods. The calculations of the transmittances and reflectivities of the beam splitters were made using the definition of probability operators in extended Hilbert spaces and the application of Naimark's theorem. The employment of equidistant states for the definition of the POVM elements allowed us to develop a recipe applicable to the tomography of qudits of any dimension, generalizing our scheme.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes photonic circuit implementations for minimum quantum state tomography of path qudits. POVM elements are defined using equidistant states in an extended Hilbert space; Naimark's theorem is applied to obtain explicit transmittances and reflectivities for the beam splitters and phase shifters; symmetries of the resulting POVMs are exploited to reduce the number of interferometric elements, yielding a construction claimed to be smaller than prior methods and valid for qudits of arbitrary dimension.

Significance. If the parameter derivations are correct and the circuits are physically realizable, the work supplies a concrete, dimension-independent recipe for minimum tomography in integrated optics. The symmetry-based circuit compaction and the use of equidistant states to achieve generality constitute the main technical contributions; these are standard tools applied to a practical engineering task rather than a fundamental advance.

major comments (1)
  1. The abstract states that beam-splitter parameters are obtained via probability operators in extended spaces and Naimark dilation, yet no explicit mapping or verification that the resulting POVM is informationally complete for minimum tomography appears in the provided description. A load-bearing step is therefore the explicit check that the constructed operators satisfy the minimum-tomography condition (sum to identity and span the space of Hermitian operators) for general d; this must be shown in the main text, not merely asserted from the choice of equidistant states.
minor comments (2)
  1. The claim that the resulting interferometers are 'smaller than those obtained by other already known methods' requires a quantitative comparison (number of beam splitters or total optical depth) against at least one cited prior construction; this comparison is missing from the abstract and should be added to the main text or a table.
  2. Notation for the equidistant states and the extended Hilbert-space embedding should be introduced with explicit definitions (e.g., inner-product relations or the precise dilation dimension) before the application of Naimark's theorem.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comment. We address the point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The abstract states that beam-splitter parameters are obtained via probability operators in extended spaces and Naimark dilation, yet no explicit mapping or verification that the resulting POVM is informationally complete for minimum tomography appears in the provided description. A load-bearing step is therefore the explicit check that the constructed operators satisfy the minimum-tomography condition (sum to identity and span the space of Hermitian operators) for general d; this must be shown in the main text, not merely asserted from the choice of equidistant states.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification strengthens the manuscript. The construction relies on equidistant states in the extended space, which by standard properties yield a symmetric informationally complete POVM after Naimark dilation; however, the original text asserted completeness from this choice without a direct derivation of the resolution-of-identity and spanning conditions for arbitrary d. In the revised version we will insert a short derivation in the main text (or a dedicated paragraph) confirming that the operators sum to the identity and linearly span the Hermitian operators on the d-dimensional space. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; construction applies external theorems to chosen inputs

full rationale

The derivation defines POVM elements via equidistant states (an explicit modeling choice), applies Naimark's theorem to obtain beam-splitter parameters, and uses POVM symmetries to minimize circuit size. These steps are direct constructions from standard quantum information results and do not reduce any claimed output to a fitted parameter or self-citation by definition. The claim of applicability to arbitrary dimension follows immediately from the equidistant-state ansatz rather than from any internal loop. No load-bearing self-citation or renaming of known results is exhibited in the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on Naimark's theorem for extending POVMs and the choice of equidistant states to enable a dimension-independent recipe; no free parameters are introduced as all circuit values are calculated.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Naimark's theorem allows implementation of POVM elements via projective measurements in an extended Hilbert space.
    Invoked explicitly for calculating beam splitter parameters from probability operators.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5728 in / 1191 out tokens · 28548 ms · 2026-05-24T16:06:29.380759+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    4: Circuit representation of the ˆU matrix for the imple- mentation of the qutrit tomography

    The second transformation in FIG. 4: Circuit representation of the ˆU matrix for the imple- mentation of the qutrit tomography. The blue rectangles are phase shifters. Fig. 2 switches some of the coefficients in|ψ′⟩ to generate the state|ψ′′⟩ =∑2 i=0 (βi|i⟩0 + γi|i⟩2) / √ 2, where β0 = β1 = α0, β2 = γ0 = α1 and γ1 = γ2 = α2. The states |ψ⟩ and|ψ′′⟩ can be r...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Qudit entanglement

    P Rungta, WJ Munro, K Nemoto, P Deuar, Gerard J Milburn, and CM Caves. Qudit entanglement. In Direc- tions in Quantum Optics , pages 149–164. Springer, 2001

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    Bell-type test of energy-time entangled qutrits

    Robert Thomas Thew, Antonio Acin, Hugo Zbinden, and Nicolas Gisin. Bell-type test of energy-time entangled qutrits. Physical review letters, 93(1):010503, 2004

    work page 2004

  4. [4]

    Creating high dimensional time- bin entanglement using mode-locked lasers

    Hugues De Riedmatten, Ivan Marcikic, Hugo Zbinden, and Nicolas Gisin. Creating high dimensional time- bin entanglement using mode-locked lasers. Quant. Inf. Comput. 2, pages 425–433, 2002

    work page 2002

  5. [5]

    Qudit quantum-state tomography

    RT Thew, Kae Nemoto, Andrew G White, and William J Munro. Qudit quantum-state tomography. Physical Re- view A, 66(1):012303, 2002

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    Generation of entangled states of qudits using twin photons

    Leonardo Neves, G Lima, JG Aguirre G´ omez, CH Monken, C Saavedra, and S P´ adua. Generation of entangled states of qudits using twin photons. Physical review letters, 94(10):100501, 2005

    work page 2005

  7. [7]

    Realization of four-level qudits using biphotons

    EV Moreva, GA Maslennikov, SS Straupe, and SP Kulik. Realization of four-level qudits using biphotons. Physical review letters, 97(2):023602, 2006

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    Gen- eration of qudits and entangled qudits

    Yongmin Li, Kuanshou Zhang, and Kunchi Peng. Gen- eration of qudits and entangled qudits. Physical Review A, 77(1):015802, 2008

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    Distribution of high- dimensional entanglement via an intra-city free-space link

    Fabian Steinlechner, Sebastian Ecker, Matthias Fink, 10 Bo Liu, Jessica Bavaresco, Marcus Huber, Thomas Scheidl, and Rupert Ursin. Distribution of high- dimensional entanglement via an intra-city free-space link. Nature Communications, 8:15971, jul 2017

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    Ex- perimental estimation of the dimension of classical and quantum systems

    Martin Hendrych, Rodrigo Gallego, Michal Miˇ cuda, Nicolas Brunner, Antonio Ac´ ın, and Juan P Torres. Ex- perimental estimation of the dimension of classical and quantum systems. Nature Physics, 8:588, jun 2012

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    On-chip generation of high-dimensional entan- gled quantum states and their coherent control

    Michael Kues, Christian Reimer, Piotr Roztocki, Luis Romero Cort´ es, Stefania Sciara, Benjamin Wetzel, Yanbing Zhang, Alfonso Cino, Sai T Chu, Brent E Lit- tle, et al. On-chip generation of high-dimensional entan- gled quantum states and their coherent control. Nature, 546(7660):622, 2017

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Multidimensional quantum entan- glement with large-scale integrated optics

    Jianwei Wang, Stefano Paesani, Yunhong Ding, Raf- faele Santagati, Paul Skrzypczyk, Alexia Salavrakos, Jordi Tura, Remigiusz Augusiak, Laura Manˇ cinska, Da- vide Bacco, et al. Multidimensional quantum entan- glement with large-scale integrated optics. Science, 360(6386):285–291, 2018

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Quantum key distribution with higher-order al- phabets using spatially encoded qudits

    SP Walborn, DS Lemelle, MP Almeida, and PH Souto Ribeiro. Quantum key distribution with higher-order al- phabets using spatially encoded qudits. Physical review letters, 96(9):090501, 2006

    work page 2006

  14. [14]

    Qudit quantum computation on matrix product states with global symmetry

    Dong-Sheng Wang, David T Stephen, and Robert Raussendorf. Qudit quantum computation on matrix product states with global symmetry. Physical Review A, 95(3):032312, 2017

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Proof- of-principle experimental realization of a qubit-like qudit- based quantum key distribution scheme

    Shuang Wang, Zhen-Qiang Yin, HF Chau, Wei Chen, Chao Wang, Guang-Can Guo, and Zheng-Fu Han. Proof- of-principle experimental realization of a qubit-like qudit- based quantum key distribution scheme. Quantum Sci- ence and Technology, 3(2):025006, 2018

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Quantum key distribution session with 16-dimensional photonic states

    Sebastian Etcheverry, Gustavo Ca˜ nas, ES G´ omez, WAT Nogueira, C Saavedra, GB Xavier, and Gustavo Lima. Quantum key distribution session with 16-dimensional photonic states. Scientific reports, 3:2316, 2013

    work page 2013

  17. [17]

    Compu- tational speed-up with a single qudit

    Zafer Gedik, Isabela Almeida Silva, Barı¸ s C ¸ akmak, G¨ oktug Karpat, Edson Luiz G´ ea Vidoto, Diogo de Oliveira Soares-Pinto, FF Fanchini, et al. Compu- tational speed-up with a single qudit. Scientific reports, 5:14671, 2015

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    Qudit-basis universal quantum computa- tion using χ (2) interactions

    Murphy Yuezhen Niu, Isaac L Chuang, and Jeffrey H Shapiro. Qudit-basis universal quantum computa- tion using χ (2) interactions. Physical review letters , 120(16):160502, 2018

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Quantum key distribution using qudits that each encode one bit of raw key

    HF Chau. Quantum key distribution using qudits that each encode one bit of raw key. Physical Review A , 92(6):062324, 2015

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    Provably secure and high-rate quantum key distribution with time-bin qudits

    Nurul T Islam, Charles Ci Wen Lim, Clinton Cahall, Jungsang Kim, and Daniel J Gauthier. Provably secure and high-rate quantum key distribution with time-bin qudits. Science advances, 3(11):e1701491, 2017

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    En- tanglement sharing via qudit channels: Nonmaximally entangled states may be necessary for one-shot opti- mal singlet fraction and negativity

    Rajarshi Pal and Somshubhro Bandyopadhyay. En- tanglement sharing via qudit channels: Nonmaximally entangled states may be necessary for one-shot opti- mal singlet fraction and negativity. Physical Review A , 97(3):032322, 2018

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Tomography of the quantum state of photons entangled in high dimensions

    Megan Agnew, Jonathan Leach, Melanie McLaren, F Stef Roux, and Robert W Boyd. Tomography of the quantum state of photons entangled in high dimensions. Physical Review A, 84(6):062101, 2011

    work page 2011

  23. [23]

    Pimenta, B

    W.M. Pimenta, B. Marques, T.O. Maciel, R.O. Vianna, A. Delgado, C. Saavedra, and S. P´ adua. Minimum to- mography of two entangled qutrits using local measure- ments of one-qutrit symmetric informationally complete positive operator-valued measure. Physical Review A , 88(1):012112, 2013

    work page 2013

  24. [24]

    Exper- imental realization of quantum tomography of pho- tonic qudits via symmetric informationally complete pos- itive operator-valued measures

    N Bent, H Qassim, AA Tahir, D Sych, G Leuchs, LL S´ anchez-Soto, E Karimi, and RW Boyd. Exper- imental realization of quantum tomography of pho- tonic qudits via symmetric informationally complete pos- itive operator-valued measures. Physical Review X , 5(4):041006, 2015

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    Implementation of quantum state tomography for time-bin qudits

    Takuya Ikuta and Hiroki Takesue. Implementation of quantum state tomography for time-bin qudits. New Journal of Physics , 19(1):013039, 2017

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Experimental quantum tomog- raphy assisted by multiply symmetric states in higher dimensions

    D Mart´ ınez, MA Sol´ ıs-Prosser, G Ca˜ nas, O Jim´ enez, A Delgado, and G Lima. Experimental quantum tomog- raphy assisted by multiply symmetric states in higher dimensions. Physical Review A, 99(1):012336, 2019

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Experimental characteriza- tion of two spatial qutrits using entanglement witnesses

    AJ Guti´ errez-Esparza, WM Pimenta, B Marques, AA Matoso, S P´ adua, et al. Experimental characteriza- tion of two spatial qutrits using entanglement witnesses. Optics express, 20(24):26351–26362, 2012

    work page 2012

  28. [28]

    De- tection of nonlocal superpositions

    AJ Guti´ errez-Esparza, WM Pimenta, B Marques, AA Matoso, J Sperling, W Vogel, and S P´ adua. De- tection of nonlocal superpositions. Physical Review A , 90(3):032328, 2014

    work page 2014

  29. [29]

    Experimental simu- lation of decoherence in photonics qudits

    B Marques, AA Matoso, WM Pimenta, AJ Guti´ errez- Esparza, MF Santos, and S P´ adua. Experimental simu- lation of decoherence in photonics qudits. Scientific re- ports, 5:16049, 2015

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    Characterizing d-dimensional quan- tum channels by means of quantum process tomography

    Juan Jos´ e Miguel Varga, Lorena Reb´ on, Q Pears Stefano, and Claudio Iemmi. Characterizing d-dimensional quan- tum channels by means of quantum process tomography. Optics letters, 43(18):4398–4401, 2018

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Cryan, John G

    Alberto Politi, Martin J. Cryan, John G. Rarity, Siyuan Yu, and Jeremy L. O’Brien. Silica-on-silicon waveguide quantum circuits. Science, 320(5876):646–649, 2008

    work page 2008

  32. [32]

    Marshall, Alberto Politi, Jonathan C

    Graham D. Marshall, Alberto Politi, Jonathan C. F. Matthews, Peter Dekker, Martin Ams, Michael J. With- ford, and Jeremy L. O’Brien. Laser written waveguide photonic quantum circuits. Opt. Express, 17(15):12546– 12554, Jul 2009

    work page 2009

  33. [33]

    Generating, manipulating and measuring entanglement and mixture with a reconfigurable photonic circuit

    Peter J Shadbolt, Maria R Verde, Alberto Peruzzo, Al- berto Politi, Anthony Laing, Mirko Lobino, Jonathan CF Matthews, Mark G Thompson, and Jeremy L O’Brien. Generating, manipulating and measuring entanglement and mixture with a reconfigurable photonic circuit. Na- ture Photonics, 6(1):45, 2012

    work page 2012

  34. [34]

    Photonic quantum technologies

    Jeremy L O’brien, Akira Furusawa, and Jelena Vuˇ ckovi´ c. Photonic quantum technologies. Nature Photonics , 3(12):687, 2009

    work page 2009

  35. [35]

    Integrated sources of photon quantum states based on nonlinear optics

    Lucia Caspani, Chunle Xiong, Benjamin J Eggleton, Daniele Bajoni, Marco Liscidini, Matteo Galli, Roberto Morandotti, and David J Moss. Integrated sources of photon quantum states based on nonlinear optics. Light: Science & Applications, 6(11):e17100, 2017

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    Phase-controlled in- tegrated photonic quantum circuits

    Brian J Smith, Dmytro Kundys, Nicholas Thomas-Peter, PGR Smith, and IA Walmsley. Phase-controlled in- tegrated photonic quantum circuits. Optics Express , 17(16):13516–13525, 2009

    work page 2009

  37. [37]

    K. M. Davis, K. Miura, N. Sugimoto, and K. Hirao. Writ- ing waveguides in glass with a femtosecond laser. Opt. Lett., 21(21):1729–1731, Nov 1996

    work page 1996

  38. [38]

    Streltsov and Nicholas F

    Alexander M. Streltsov and Nicholas F. Borrelli. Fab- rication and analysis of a directional coupler written in 11 glass by nanojoule femtosecond laser pulses. Opt. Lett., 26(1):42–43, Jan 2001

    work page 2001

  39. [39]

    Photonic quan- tum simulators

    Al´ an Aspuru-Guzik and Philip Walther. Photonic quan- tum simulators. Nature Physics, 8:285, apr 2012

    work page 2012

  40. [40]

    On- chip quantum simulation with superconducting circuits

    Andrew A Houck, Hakan E T¨ ureci, and Jens Koch. On- chip quantum simulation with superconducting circuits. Nature Physics, 8:292, apr 2012

    work page 2012

  41. [41]

    Quantum transport simulations in a programmable nanophotonic processor

    Nicholas C Harris, Gregory R Steinbrecher, Mihika Prabhu, Yoav Lahini, Jacob Mower, Darius Bunandar, Changchen Chen, Franco NC Wong, Tom Baehr-Jones, Michael Hochberg, et al. Quantum transport simulations in a programmable nanophotonic processor. Nature Pho- tonics, 11(7):447, 2017

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    Multiloop interferometers for quan- tum information processing, May 18 2017

    Andrew J Kerman. Multiloop interferometers for quan- tum information processing, May 18 2017. US Patent App. 15/354,275

    work page 2017

  43. [43]

    Remote preparation of photon polariza- tion states within a network

    Fan Qiu-Bo. Remote preparation of photon polariza- tion states within a network. Chinese Physics Letters , 25(1):20, 2008

    work page 2008

  44. [44]

    Controlled remote preparation of a two-qubit state via an asymmetric quantum channel

    Wang Zhang-Yin. Controlled remote preparation of a two-qubit state via an asymmetric quantum channel. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 55(2):244, 2011

    work page 2011

  45. [45]

    Controlled remote state preparation via partially entangled quantum chan- nel

    Chun Wang, Zhi Zeng, and Xi-Han Li. Controlled remote state preparation via partially entangled quantum chan- nel. Quantum Information Processing, 14(3):1077–1089, 2015

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    Flexible controlled joint remote preparation of an arbitrary two-qubit state via non-maximally entangled quantum channels

    Thi Bich Cao, Ba An Nguyen, et al. Flexible controlled joint remote preparation of an arbitrary two-qubit state via non-maximally entangled quantum channels. Ad- vances in Natural Sciences: Nanoscience and Nanotech- nology, 7(2):025007, 2016

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    Experimental access to higher-dimensional entangled quantum systems using in- tegrated optics

    Christoph Schaeff, Robert Polster, Marcus Huber, Sven Ramelow, and Anton Zeilinger. Experimental access to higher-dimensional entangled quantum systems using in- tegrated optics. Optica, 2(6):523–529, 2015

    work page 2015

  48. [48]

    Complex wave- field reconstruction using phase-space tomography.Phys- ical review letters, 72(8):1137, 1994

    MG Raymer, Ml Beck, and D McAlister. Complex wave- field reconstruction using phase-space tomography.Phys- ical review letters, 72(8):1137, 1994

    work page 1994

  49. [49]

    Deterministic entangle- ment and tomography of ion–spin qubits

    JP Home, MJ McDonnell, DM Lucas, G Imreh, BC Keitch, DJ Szwer, NR Thomas, SC Webster, DN Stacey, and AM Steane. Deterministic entangle- ment and tomography of ion–spin qubits. New Journal of Physics, 8(9):188, 2006

    work page 2006

  50. [50]

    Process tomography of ion trap quantum gates

    M Riebe, K Kim, P Schindler, T Monz, PO Schmidt, TK K¨ orber, W H¨ ansel, H H¨ affner, CF Roos, and R Blatt. Process tomography of ion trap quantum gates. Physical review letters, 97(22):220407, 2006

    work page 2006

  51. [51]

    Quan- tum state tomography with noninstantaneous measure- ments, imperfections, and decoherence

    Pierre Six, Ph Campagne-Ibarcq, Igor Dotsenko, Alain Sarlette, Benjamin Huard, and Pierre Rouchon. Quan- tum state tomography with noninstantaneous measure- ments, imperfections, and decoherence. Physical Review A, 93(1):012109, 2016

    work page 2016

  52. [52]

    Quantum state tomography of a mechani- cal oscillator

    Robert Delaney, Adam Reed, Reed Andrews, and Kon- rad Lehnert. Quantum state tomography of a mechani- cal oscillator. Bulletin of the American Physical Society , 2019

    work page 2019

  53. [53]

    Quantum state tomogra- phy via reduced density matrices

    Tao Xin, Dawei Lu, Joel Klassen, Nengkun Yu, Zhengfeng Ji, Jianxin Chen, Xian Ma, Guilu Long, Bei Zeng, and Raymond Laflamme. Quantum state tomogra- phy via reduced density matrices. Physical review letters, 118(2):020401, 2017

    work page 2017

  54. [54]

    Titchener, Alexander S

    James G. Titchener, Alexander S. Solntsev, and An- drey A. Sukhorukov. Two-photon tomography using on- chip quantum walks. Optics letters , 41(17):4079–4082, 2016

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    Scalable on-chip quantum state tomogra- phy

    James G Titchener, Markus Gr¨ afe, Ren´ e Heilmann, Alexander S Solntsev, Alexander Szameit, and Andrey A Sukhorukov. Scalable on-chip quantum state tomogra- phy. npj Quantum Information , 4(1):19, 2018

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    Quantum state tomography with a single measurement setup

    Dikla Oren, Maor Mutzafi, Yonina C Eldar, and Mordechai Segev. Quantum state tomography with a single measurement setup. Optica, 4(8):993–999, 2017

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    Paiva-S´ anchez, E

    C. Paiva-S´ anchez, E. Burgos-Inostroza, O. Jim´ enez, and A. Delgado. Quantum tomography via equidistant states. Physical Review A, 82(3):032115, 2010

    work page 2010

  58. [58]

    Efficient quantum to- mography needs complementary and symmetric measure- ments

    D´ enes Petz and L´ aszl´ o Ruppert. Efficient quantum to- mography needs complementary and symmetric measure- ments. Reports on Mathematical Physics, 69(2):161–177, 2012

    work page 2012

  59. [59]

    Optimal quantum-state tomography with known parameters

    D´ enes Petz and L´ aszl´ o Ruppert. Optimal quantum-state tomography with known parameters. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 45(8):085306, 2012

    work page 2012

  60. [60]

    Notes on general sic-povms

    Alexey E Rastegin. Notes on general sic-povms. Physica Scripta, 89(8):085101, 2014

    work page 2014

  61. [61]

    Symmetric informationally com- plete quantum measurements

    Joseph M Renes, Robin Blume-Kohout, Andrew J Scott, and Carlton M Caves. Symmetric informationally com- plete quantum measurements. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 45(6):2171–2180, 2004

    work page 2004

  62. [62]

    Quantum information, volume 16

    Stephen Barnett. Quantum information, volume 16. Ox- ford University Press, 2009

    work page 2009

  63. [63]

    Infinite sequences of linear function- als, positive operator-valued measures and naimark ex- tension theorem

    Roberto Beneduci. Infinite sequences of linear function- als, positive operator-valued measures and naimark ex- tension theorem. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 42(3):441–451, 2010

    work page 2010

  64. [64]

    Povms and naimark’s theorem without sums

    Bob Coecke and ´Eric Oliver Paquette. Povms and naimark’s theorem without sums. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 210:15–31, 2008

    work page 2008

  65. [65]

    Unsharpness, naimark theorem and informational equivalence of quantum observables

    Roberto Beneduci. Unsharpness, naimark theorem and informational equivalence of quantum observables. In- ternational Journal of Theoretical Physics , 49(12):3030– 3038, 2010

    work page 2010

  66. [66]

    Experimental scheme for qubit and qutrit symmetric informationally complete positive operator-valued measurements using multiport devices

    Gelo Noel M Tabia. Experimental scheme for qubit and qutrit symmetric informationally complete positive operator-valued measurements using multiport devices. Physical Review A, 86(6):062107, 2012

    work page 2012

  67. [67]

    Bernstein, and Philip Bertani

    Michael Reck, Anton Zeilinger, Herbert J. Bernstein, and Philip Bertani. Experimental realization of any dis- crete unitary operator. Physical Review Letters, 73(1):58, 1994

    work page 1994

  68. [68]

    Optimal design for universal multiport interferometers

    William R Clements, Peter C Humphreys, Benjamin J Metcalf, W Steven Kolthammer, and Ian A Walmsley. Optimal design for universal multiport interferometers. Optica, 3(12):1460–1465, 2016

    work page 2016

  69. [69]

    Minimal qubit tomography

    Jaroslav ˇReh´ aˇ cek, Berthold-Georg Englert, and Dagomir Kaszlikowski. Minimal qubit tomography. Physical Re- view A, 70(5):052321, 2004

    work page 2004

  70. [70]

    Carvalho M.R

    M.A.D. Carvalho M.R. Barros J.G. Fonseca J. Ferraz M. Terra Cunha W.M. Pimenta, B. Marques and S. P´ adua. Minimal state tomography of spatial qubits using a spatial light modulator. Optics Express , 18(24):24423– 24433, 2010

    work page 2010

  71. [71]

    Tunable quantum interference in a 3d integrated circuit

    Zachary Chaboyer, Thomas Meany, LG Helt, Michael J Withford, and MJ Steel. Tunable quantum interference in a 3d integrated circuit. Scientific reports, 5:9601, 2015

    work page 2015

  72. [72]

    Laser writ- 12 ten circuits for quantum photonics

    Thomas Meany, Markus Gr¨ afe, Ren´ e Heilmann, Ar- mando Perez-Leija, Simon Gross, Michael J Steel, Michael J Withford, and Alexander Szameit. Laser writ- 12 ten circuits for quantum photonics. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 9(4):363–384, 2015

    work page 2015

  73. [73]

    Quantum walks of correlated pho- ton pairs in two-dimensional waveguide arrays

    Konstantinos Poulios, Robert Keil, Daniel Fry, Jas- min DA Meinecke, Jonathan CF Matthews, Alberto Politi, Mirko Lobino, Markus Gr¨ afe, Matthias Heinrich, Stefan Nolte, et al. Quantum walks of correlated pho- ton pairs in two-dimensional waveguide arrays. Physical review letters, 112(14):143604, 2014

    work page 2014