Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 80 references

Electron transfer at thermally heterogeneous molecule-metal interfaces

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A bithermal Marcus formalism for molecule-metal electron transfer predicts that interfacial heat conduction has an electronic component that survives at zero net electronic current.

desk verdict Extends the authors' bithermal Marcus formalism to molecule-metal interfaces with a clean derivation of thermoelectric and heat-current effects; main caveat is the strong-coupling assumption and the model's idealized junction. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.00501 v1 pith:H2QHLFV3 submitted 2019-08-01 cond-mat.mes-hall

Galen T. Craven , Abraham Nitzan This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords transferelectronelectronicheatmetaltemperaturecontributionexamined
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Molecular junctions are tiny electrical circuits in which a single molecule or small group of molecules sits between metal contacts. In most models, the molecule and the metals are assumed to share one temperature. This paper treats the case where the molecule's surrounding environment and the metal electrode have different temperatures, a situation that can arise while a device is operating. The authors extend Marcus theory, the standard description of electron transfer coupled to nuclear motion, to this two-temperature setting and derive the electron transfer rates in both directions.

The derived rates depend on each temperature separately, not just on the difference between them. When the temperatures differ, every electron hop also moves a small amount of heat: the heat carried by the hop equals the energy difference between the molecular level and the metal's chemical potential. A central result is that heat can flow even when the net electric current is zero, because the forward and backward electron hops balance in number while carrying unequal amounts of heat. The paper also computes the voltage needed to stop the thermally driven current and the Seebeck coefficient for a model two-electrode junction.

The theory relies on the assumption that the molecular nuclear environment stays thermally equilibrated at its own temperature during the electron transfer, which holds when nuclear motion is fast compared to hopping. The authors note that the opposite limit requires a separate nonequilibrium treatment. If the assumptions hold, the framework offers a practical model for thermoelectric effects in the hopping conduction regime of molecular electronics.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Electron transfer between a molecular species and a metal electrode, each at a different local temperature, is associated with interfacial heat transfer, and the electron exchange contributes to interfacial heat conduction even when the net electronic current vanishes. This is stated in the abstract and derived in Sections II and III, with the heat current given by Eq. (21) and the steady-state flux relations in Eq. (A14).

Load-bearing premise

The molecular nuclear environment remains in internal thermal equilibrium at temperature TS while exchanging electrons with a metal at a different temperature TM. This nonadiabatic, strong-coupling limit is stated in Sec. II: 'relaxation of the nuclear environment to a transient distorted state induced by electron localization occurs on a faster timescale than the electronic transition rate.' It is this assumption that justifies the Boltzmann factor exp[-betaS E_m^double-dagger(x)] in Eqs. (8) and (9) and the heat current expressions in Eqs. (18)-(21). If nuclear relaxation is not fast, the bithermal rate expressions are not valid; the authors flag this weak-coupling case as future work in Sec. V.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a theoretical analysis of electron transfer between a redox molecule and a metal electrode when the metal and the molecular nuclear environment are held at different temperatures. The authors derive bithermal Marcus rate expressions for molecule-to-metal and metal-to-molecule transfer (Eqs. (8) and (9)), which reduce to the standard Marcus-Hush-Chidsey rates in the unithermal limit. They then derive the interfacial heat current carried by electron exchange (Eq. (21)) and show that it remains finite even when the net electronic current vanishes at steady state. The theory is extended to a two-electrode molecular junction with a linear temperature profile, yielding expressions for the electric current and Seebeck coefficient (Eqs. (24)-(27)). The paper's main physical claim is that electron exchange across a molecule-metal interface contributes to interfacial heat conduction and thermoelectric response in the hopping-transport regime.

Significance. The paper is a significant extension of the authors' earlier bithermal electron-transfer formalism to metal electrodes, providing a concrete, self-contained framework for modelling redox molecular junctions under thermal gradients. Its unithermal limit correctly recovers well-established rate theory, and the heat-current expressions are validated by energy-conservation checks. The predicted heat transport in the absence of net charge current at a single interface is a falsifiable and physically interesting effect. The two-electrode analysis gives a well-defined Seebeck coefficient that reduces to the known elastic-transport result in the appropriate limit, and the paper identifies signatures, such as the TM-induced rate turnover in Fig. 1(c), that could be tested experimentally.

major comments (1)
  1. [§II.B (Fig. 3)] The zero-current condition used to compute the electrode potential Φ is not specified. In the two-state kinetic equations (13), the steady-state populations (15) always satisfy ka→b P_a^ss = kb→a P_b^ss, so the net electronic current between the molecule and a single metal electrode vanishes for any value of Φ. The curves in Fig. 3 are therefore not determined by the condition I = 0 unless an additional constraint is imposed (for example, fixed P_a/P_b, as in an electrochemical standard-state convention, or a specific reference-electrode configuration). Please state the definition of I and the protocol used to calculate Φ explicitly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Header] The manuscript contains typographical artifacts in the header, such as "me-tal" and "Phil adelphia"; these are likely PDF-extraction artifacts and should be cleaned up.
  2. [Appendix A] The constant T is used in Eqs. (A1)-(A4) but is not defined before Eq. (A1); please define it explicitly when it is first introduced.
  3. [Appendix A] The notation ∆Eba is used in Eqs. (A2), (A3), (A8), and (A9) without being defined; since ∆Eba = -∆Eab, please define it or use consistent notation.
  4. [Below Eq. (21)] The text says that the conservation relation Qdot_M + Qdot_S = 0 is "shown explicitly in Appendix A", but Appendix A reports only numerical verification over a variety of parameter values (Eqs. (A6) and (A12)). Please adjust the wording to match the numerical check.
  5. [Sec. IV] The assumption TS = (T_L + T_R)/2 is introduced from a linear temperature profile without discussion of its validity; a brief comment on the limitations of this assumption would improve the presentation.
Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on standard Marcus theory and on the assumption that both the molecular nuclear environment and the metal remain in internal equilibrium at their respective temperatures. The junction thermoelectric results further depend on the ad hoc choice TS = (T_L + T_R)/2. No new entities are postulated, and the numerical example parameters are illustrative rather than fitted to data.

free parameters (4)
  • Reorganization energy ER = 0.1 eV (figures)
    Set to 0.1 eV in all numerical examples; a typical order of magnitude for molecular electron transfer, chosen by hand for illustration and not fitted to any target result. The qualitative claims do not depend on this specific value.
  • Molecule-metal coupling Gamma = 100 ps^-1 (figures)
    Set to 100 ps^-1 in all figures; a typical nonadiabatic rate scale, chosen by hand and not fitted. The central results are qualitative and independent of this value.
  • Reaction free energy Delta Eab = Varied per figure (e.g., 0.01 eV to -0.5 eV)
    Scanned as an independent variable to map different reaction regimes; a model parameter, not fitted to a target.
  • Molecular temperature assignment TS = TS = (T_L + T_R)/2
    Assumed in Sec. IV A from a linear temperature profile with the molecular site at the midpoint. This is a modeling choice rather than an empirical fit, and it affects the junction thermoelectric results.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Marcus theory with two shifted parabolic free energy surfaces (Eqs. 4-5) describes heterogeneous electron transfer.
    The paper adopts the standard Marcus model for redox ET without proof, using it as the foundation for all rate expressions.
  • domain assumption The molecular nuclear environment remains in internal thermal equilibrium at temperature TS throughout the ET process (Boltzmann weight in Eqs. 8-9).
    This is the strong-coupling, nonadiabatic limit stated in Sec. II; the authors note that nuclear relaxation is faster than the electronic transition rate. The weak-coupling limit is explicitly deferred to future work in Sec. V.
  • domain assumption The metal remains in equilibrium at temperature TM with a Fermi-Dirac occupation f(betaM, epsilon).
    Standard assumption for a metal electrode; the electron exchange is assumed not to disturb the metal's electronic distribution.
  • standard math Energy conservation during ET is enforced by the delta-function constraint gc(x, epsilon) = 0 (Eq. 7).
    Standard Marcus energy-conservation constraint used to integrate over the nuclear coordinate.
  • ad hoc to paper In the junction model, the temperature gradient is linear and the molecular site lies midway, TS = (T_L + T_R)/2.
    Introduced in Sec. IV A with the justification of a linear gradient and a uniformly seated molecule. This approximation is not derived and is a simplifying modeling choice.
  • domain assumption Landau-Zener relation PLZ(epsilon) rho_M(epsilon) = T Gamma(epsilon) in the nonadiabatic limit.
    Used in Appendix A for the single-electron heat current derivation; a standard result connecting Landau-Zener transition probabilities to the Golden Rule rate.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electron transfer at thermally heterogeneous molecule-metal interfaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/H2QHLFV3

@misc{pith2026190800501,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electron transfer at thermally heterogeneous molecule-metal interfaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/H2QHLFV3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.00501}
}
read the original abstract

The rate of electron transfer between a molecular species and a metal, each at a different local temperature, is examined theoretically through implementation of a bithermal (characterized by two temperatures) Marcus formalism. Expressions for the rate constant and the electronic contribution to a heat transfer mechanism which is induced by the temperature gradient between molecule and metal are constructed. The system of coupled dynamical equations describing the electronic and thermal currents are derived and examined over diverse ranges of reaction geometries and temperature gradients. It is shown that electron transfer across the molecule-metal interface is associated with heat transfer and that the electron exchange between metal and molecule makes a distinct contribution to the interfacial heat conduction even when the net electronic current vanishes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.00501 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (b). Comparing Figs. 1(a) and 1(b) it can be observed that changing the temperature of the metal results in a dif￾ferent functional form than variation of the temperature (c) (a) (b) FIG. 1. Reaction rate ka→b as a function of (a) TS with TM = 300 K held constant and (b) TM with TS = 300 K held constant. Each curve is calculated for a different value of ∆Eab shown in the legend of (a) in units of eV. The dashed vert… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Molecular occupation probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Electrostatic potential Φ to maintain zero current a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Heat current of the molecular environment [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Electric current [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Aviram and author M

    author A. Aviram and author M. A. Ratner , journal Chem. Phys. Lett. volume 29 , pages 277 ( year 1974 ), doi:10.1016/0009-2614(74)85031-1

    doi:10.1016/0009-2614(74)85031-1 1974

  2. [2]

    author R. L. Carroll and author C. B. Gorman , journal Angew. Chem., Ind. Ed. volume 41 , pages 4378 ( year 2002 ), doi:10.1002/1521-3773(20021202)41:23<4378::AID-ANIE4378>3.0.CO;2-A

    work page doi:10.1002/1521-3773(20021202)41:23 2002

  3. [3]

    Nitzan and author M

    author A. Nitzan and author M. A. Ratner , journal Science volume 300 , pages 1384 ( year 2003 ), doi:10.1126/science.1081572

    doi:10.1126/science.1081572 2003

  4. [4]

    Coropceanu , author J

    author V. Coropceanu , author J. Cornil , author D. A. da Silva Filho , author Y. Olivier , author R. Silbey , and author J.-L. Br \'e das , journal Chem. Rev. volume 107 , pages 926 ( year 2007 )

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    Galperin , author M

    author M. Galperin , author M. A. Ratner , and author A. Nitzan , journal J. Phys.: Condens. Matter volume 19 , pages 103201 ( year 2007 a )

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    Dubi and author M

    author Y. Dubi and author M. Di Ventra , journal Rev. Mod. Phys. volume 83 , pages 131 ( year 2011 ), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.83.131

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.131 2011

  7. [7]

    Galperin , author A

    author M. Galperin , author A. Nitzan , and author M. A. Ratner , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 75 , pages 155312 ( year 2007 b ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.75.155312

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.155312 2007

  8. [8]

    Galperin , author K

    author M. Galperin , author K. Saito , author A. V. Balatsky , and author A. Nitzan , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 80 , pages 115427 ( year 2009 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.80.115427

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.115427 2009

Show all 80 references
  1. [9]

    Galperin and author A

    author M. Galperin and author A. Nitzan , journal J. Phys. Chem. Lett. volume 2 , pages 2110 ( year 2011 a ), doi:10.1021/jz2008853

    2011 doi

  2. [10]

    Galperin and author A

    author M. Galperin and author A. Nitzan , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 84 , pages 195325 ( year 2011 b ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.84.195325

    2011 doi

  3. [11]

    author A. P. Horsfield , author D. R. Bowler , author H. Ness , author C. G. S\'anchez , author T. N. Todorov , and author A. J. Fisher , journal Rep. Prog. Phys. volume 69 , pages 1195 ( year 2006 )

    2006

  4. [12]

    D'Agosta and author M

    author R. D'Agosta and author M. D. Ventra , journal J. Phys.: Condens. Matter volume 20 , pages 374102 ( year 2008 )

    2008

  5. [13]

    Asai , journal Phys

    author Y. Asai , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 84 , pages 085436 ( year 2011 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.84.085436

    2011 doi

  6. [14]

    Asai , journal Phys

    author Y. Asai , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 91 , pages 161402 ( year 2015 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.91.161402

    2015 doi

  7. [15]

    Lake and author S

    author R. Lake and author S. Datta , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 46 , pages 4757 ( year 1992 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.46.4757

    1992 doi

  8. [16]

    H\"artle and author M

    author R. H\"artle and author M. Thoss , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 83 , pages 115414 ( year 2011 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.83.115414

    2011 doi

  9. [17]

    Lu , author H

    author J.-T. Lu , author H. Zhou , author J.-W. Jiang , and author J.-S. Wang , journal AIP Adv. volume 5 , pages 053204 ( year 2015 ), doi:10.1063/1.4917017

    2015 doi

  10. [18]

    author D. G. Cahill , author K. Goodson , and author A. Majumdar , journal J. Heat Transfer volume 124 , pages 223 ( year 2002 )

    2002

  11. [19]

    author D. G. Cahill , author W. K. Ford , author K. E. Goodson , author G. D. Mahan , author A. Majumdar , author H. J. Maris , author R. Merlin , and author S. R. Phillpot , journal J. Appl. Phys. volume 93 , pages 793 ( year 2003 ), doi:10.1063/1.1524305

    2003 doi

  12. [20]

    author D. M. Leitner , journal Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. volume 59 , pages 233 ( year 2008 ), doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.59.032607.093606

    2008 arXiv

  13. [21]

    author D. M. Leitner , journal J. Phys. Chem. B volume 117 , pages 12820 ( year 2013 ), doi:10.1021/jp402012z

    2013 doi

  14. [22]

    author D. M. Leitner , journal Adv. Phys. volume 64 , pages 445 ( year 2015 ), doi:10.1080/00018732.2015.1109817

    2015

  15. [23]

    Li , author J

    author N. Li , author J. Ren , author L. Wang , author G. Zhang , author P. H\"anggi , and author B. Li , journal Rev. Mod. Phys. volume 84 , pages 1045 ( year 2012 ), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1045

    2012 doi

  16. [24]

    Dhar , journal Adv

    author A. Dhar , journal Adv. Phys. volume 57 , pages 457 ( year 2008 ), doi:10.1080/00018730802538522

    2008 doi

  17. [25]

    Luo and author G

    author T. Luo and author G. Chen , journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. volume 15 , pages 3389 ( year 2013 ), doi:10.1039/C2CP43771F

    2013 doi

  18. [26]

    author N. I. Rubtsova , author L. N. Qasim , author A. A. Kurnosov , author A. L. Burin , and author I. V. Rubtsov , journal Acc. Chem. Res. volume 48 , pages 2547 ( year 2015 a ), doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00299

    2015 doi

  19. [27]

    author N. I. Rubtsova , author C. M. Nyby , author H. Zhang , author B. Zhang , author X. Zhou , author J. Jayawickramarajah , author A. L. Burin , and author I. V. Rubtsov , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 142 , pages 212412 ( year 2015 b ), doi:10.1063/1.4916326

    2015 doi

  20. [28]

    Chen , author M

    author Y.-C. Chen , author M. Zwolak , and author M. Di Ventra , journal Nano Lett. volume 3 , pages 1691 ( year 2003 ), doi:10.1021/nl0348544

    2003 doi

  21. [29]

    Pecchia , author G

    author A. Pecchia , author G. Romano , and author A. Di Carlo , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 75 , pages 035401 ( year 2007 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.75.035401

    2007 doi

  22. [30]

    Yang , author X

    author N. Yang , author X. Xu , author G. Zhang , and author B. Li , journal AIP Adv. volume 2 , pages 041410 ( year 2012 ), doi:10.1063/1.4773462

    2012 doi

  23. [31]

    author N. A. Zimbovskaya , journal J. Phys.: Condens. Matter volume 28 , pages 183002 ( year 2016 ), http://stacks.iop.org/0953-8984/28/i=18/a=183002

    2016

  24. [32]

    Li , author L

    author B. Li , author L. Wang , and author G. Casati , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 93 , pages 184301 ( year 2004 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.184301

    2004 doi

  25. [33]

    Segal and author A

    author D. Segal and author A. Nitzan , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 122 , pages 194704 ( year 2005 ), doi:10.1063/1.1900063

    2005 doi

  26. [34]

    author C. W. Chang , author D. Okawa , author A. Majumdar , and author A. Zettl , journal Science volume 314 , pages 1121 ( year 2006 ), doi:10.1126/science.1132898

    2006 doi

  27. [35]

    Segal , journal Phys

    author D. Segal , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 100 , pages 105901 ( year 2008 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.105901

    2008 doi

  28. [36]

    Wu and author D

    author L.-A. Wu and author D. Segal , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 102 , pages 095503 ( year 2009 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.095503

    2009 doi

  29. [37]

    Zhong , author P

    author W.-R. Zhong , author P. Yang , author B.-Q. Ai , author Z.-G. Shao , and author B. Hu , journal Phys. Rev. E volume 79 , pages 050103 ( year 2009 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.79.050103

    2009 doi

  30. [38]

    Ren and author J.-X

    author J. Ren and author J.-X. Zhu , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 87 , pages 241412 ( year 2013 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.87.241412

    2013 doi

  31. [39]

    Ming , author H.-M

    author Y. Ming , author H.-M. Li , and author Z.-J. Ding , journal Phys. Rev. E volume 93 , pages 032127 ( year 2016 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.93.032127

    2016 doi

  32. [40]

    Arrachea , author N

    author L. Arrachea , author N. Bode , and author F. von Oppen , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 90 , pages 125450 ( year 2014 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.90.125450

    2014 doi

  33. [41]

    Li , author I

    author Q. Li , author I. Duchemin , author S. Xiong , author G. C. Solomon , and author D. Donadio , journal J. Phys. Chem. C volume 119 , pages 24636 ( year 2015 ), doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b07429

    2015 doi

  34. [42]

    Delor , author P

    author M. Delor , author P. A. Scattergood , author I. V. Sazanovich , author A. W. Parker , author G. M. Greetham , author A. J. H. M. Meijer , author M. Towrie , and author J. A. Weinstein , journal Science volume 346 , pages 1492 ( year 2014 ), doi:10.1126/science.1259995

    2014 doi

  35. [43]

    Vl c ek Jr

    author A. Vl c ek Jr. , author H. Kvapilov\' a , author M. Towrie , and author S. Z\' a li s , journal Acc. Chem. Res. volume 48 , pages 868 ( year 2015 ), doi:10.1021/ar5004048

    2015 doi

  36. [44]

    author A. A. Bakulin , author R. Lovrincic , author X. Yu , author O. Selig , author H. J. Bakker , author Y. L. Rezus , author P. K. Nayak , author A. Fonari , author V. Coropceanu , author J.-L. Br \'e das , et al. , journal Nat. Commun. volume 6 , pages 7880 ( year 2015 ), ...

    2015 doi

  37. [45]

    Ren , author J.-X

    author J. Ren , author J.-X. Zhu , author J. E. Gubernatis , author C. Wang , and author B. Li , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 85 , pages 155443 ( year 2012 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.85.155443

    2012 doi

  38. [46]

    Walczak , journal Physica B volume 392 , pages 173 ( year 2007 ), ISSN issn 0921-4526 , doi:10.1016/j.physb.2006.11.013

    author K. Walczak , journal Physica B volume 392 , pages 173 ( year 2007 ), ISSN issn 0921-4526 , doi:10.1016/j.physb.2006.11.013

    2007 doi

  39. [47]

    Koch , author J

    author T. Koch , author J. Loos , and author H. Fehske , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 89 , pages 155133 ( year 2014 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.89.155133

    2014 doi

  40. [48]

    author C. A. Perroni , author D. Ninno , and author V. Cataudella , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 90 , pages 125421 ( year 2014 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.90.125421

    2014 doi

  41. [49]

    author N. A. Zimbovskaya , journal J. Phys.: Condens. Matter volume 26 , pages 275303 ( year 2014 )

    2014

  42. [50]

    Migliore and author A

    author A. Migliore and author A. Nitzan , journal J. Am. Chem. Soc. volume 135 , pages 9420 ( year 2013 ), doi:10.1021/ja401336u

    2013 doi

  43. [51]

    author R. A. Marcus , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 24 , pages 966 ( year 1956 ), doi:10.1063/1.1742723

    1956 doi

  44. [52]

    author R. A. Marcus , journal Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. volume 15 , pages 155 ( year 1964 ), doi:10.1146/annurev.pc.15.100164.001103

    1964

  45. [53]

    author R. A. Marcus and author N. Sutin , journal Biochim. Biophys. Acta volume 811 , pages 265 ( year 1985 ), doi:10.1016/0304-4173(85)90014-X

    1985 doi

  46. [54]

    author R. A. Marcus , journal Rev. Mod. Phys. volume 65 , pages 599 ( year 1993 ), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.65.599

    1993 doi

  47. [55]

    Peters , journal J

    author B. Peters , journal J. Phys. Chem. B volume 119 , pages 6349 ( year 2015 ), doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b02547

    2015 doi

  48. [56]

    author G. T. Craven and author A. Nitzan , journal Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. volume 113 , pages 9421 ( year 2016 ), doi:10.1073/pnas.1609141113

    2016 doi

  49. [57]

    author G. T. Craven and author A. Nitzan , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 118 , pages 207201 ( year 2017 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.207201

    2017 doi

  50. [58]

    Nitzan , title Chemical Dynamics in Condensed Phases: Relaxation, Transfer, and Reactions in Condensed Molecular Systems ( publisher Oxford University Press , year 2006 )

    author A. Nitzan , title Chemical Dynamics in Condensed Phases: Relaxation, Transfer, and Reactions in Condensed Molecular Systems ( publisher Oxford University Press , year 2006 )

    2006

  51. [59]

    author R. A. Marcus , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 43 , pages 679 ( year 1965 ), doi:10.1063/1.1696792

    1965 doi

  52. [60]

    St \"a hler , author M

    author J. St \"a hler , author M. Meyer , author X. Y. Zhu , author U. Bovensiepen , and author M. Wolf , journal ‎New J. Phys. volume 9 , pages 394 ( year 2007 ), doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/10/394

    2007 doi

  53. [61]

    Zeng , author R

    author Y. Zeng , author R. B. Smith , author P. Bai , and author M. Z. Bazant , journal J. Electroanal. Chem. volume 735 , pages 77 ( year 2014 ), ISSN issn 1572-6657 , doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2014.09.038

    2014 doi

  54. [62]

    Zanetti-Polzi and author S

    author L. Zanetti-Polzi and author S. Corni , journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. volume 18 , pages 10538 ( year 2016 ), doi:10.1039/C6CP00044D

    2016 doi

  55. [63]

    author J. T. Hupp and author M. J. Weaver , journal J. Phys. Chem. volume 88 , pages 6128 ( year 1984 ), doi:10.1021/j150669a015

    1984 doi

  56. [64]

    Laborda , author M

    author E. Laborda , author M. C. Henstridge , and author R. G. Compton , journal J. Electroanal. Chem. volume 667 , pages 48 ( year 2012 ), ISSN issn 1572-6657 , doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2011.12.011

    2012 doi

  57. [65]

    Laborda , author M

    author E. Laborda , author M. C. Henstridge , author C. Batchelor-McAuley , and author R. G. Compton , journal Chem. Soc. Rev. volume 42 , pages 4894 ( year 2013 ), doi:10.1039/C3CS35487C

    2013 doi

  58. [66]

    Hush , journal Electrochim

    author N. Hush , journal Electrochim. Acta volume 13 , pages 1005 ( year 1968 ), doi:10.1016/0013-4686(68)80032-5

    1968 doi

  59. [67]

    author C. E. D. Chidsey , journal Science volume 251 , pages 919 ( year 1991 ), doi:10.1126/science.251.4996.919

    1991 doi

  60. [68]

    Migliore and author A

    author A. Migliore and author A. Nitzan , journal ACS Nano volume 5 , pages 6669 ( year 2011 ), doi:10.1021/nn202206e

    2011 doi

  61. [69]

    Migliore , author P

    author A. Migliore , author P. Schiff , and author A. Nitzan , journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. volume 14 , pages 13746 ( year 2012 ), doi:10.1039/C2CP41442B

    2012 doi

  62. [70]

    Reddy , author S.-Y

    author P. Reddy , author S.-Y. Jang , author R. A. Segalman , and author A. Majumdar , journal Science volume 315 , pages 1568 ( year 2007 ), doi:10.1126/science.1137149

    2007 doi

  63. [71]

    Galperin , author A

    author M. Galperin , author A. Nitzan , and author M. A. Ratner , journal Mol. Phys. volume 106 , pages 397 ( year 2008 ), doi:10.1080/00268970701837784

    2008 doi

  64. [72]

    Ke , author W

    author S.-H. Ke , author W. Yang , author S. Curtarolo , and author H. U. Baranger , journal Nano Lett. volume 9 , pages 1011 ( year 2009 ), doi:10.1021/nl8031229

    2009 doi

  65. [73]

    Liu and author Y.-C

    author Y.-S. Liu and author Y.-C. Chen , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 79 , pages 193101 ( year 2009 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.79.193101

    2009 doi

  66. [74]

    Sadat , author A

    author S. Sadat , author A. Tan , author Y. J. Chua , and author P. Reddy , journal Nano Lett. volume 10 , pages 2613 ( year 2010 ), doi:10.1021/nl101354e

    2010 doi

  67. [75]

    Tan , author J

    author A. Tan , author J. Balachandran , author S. Sadat , author V. Gavini , author B. D. Dunietz , author S.-Y. Jang , and author P. Reddy , journal J. Am. Chem. Soc. volume 133 , pages 8838 ( year 2011 ), doi:10.1021/ja202178k

    2011 doi

  68. [76]

    Kim , author W

    author Y. Kim , author W. Jeong , author K. Kim , author W. Lee , and author P. Reddy , journal Nature Nanotech. volume 9 , pages 881 ( year 2014 ), doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.209

    2014 doi

  69. [77]

    Lee , author S

    author E.-S. Lee , author S. Cho , author H.-K. Lyeo , and author Y.-H. Kim , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 112 , pages 136601 ( year 2014 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.136601

    2014 doi

  70. [78]

    Koch , author F

    author J. Koch , author F. von Oppen , author Y. Oreg , and author E. Sela , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 70 , pages 195107 ( year 2004 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.70.195107

    2004 doi

  71. [79]

    Simine , author W

    author L. Simine , author W. J. Chen , and author D. Segal , journal J. Phys. Chem. C volume 119 , pages 12097 ( year 2015 ), doi:10.1021/jp512648f

    2015 doi

  72. [80]

    We will expand on this issue in a future paper

    note It is important to note that these results depend on the protocol used to define T and . We will expand on this issue in a future paper

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.