REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 87 references
Interaction-driven plateau transition between integer and fractional Chern Insulators
T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read Numerical evidence points to a direct transition from a C=4 Chern insulator to a 1/3 Laughlin state as repulsion grows.
desk verdict Credible new transition with a strong TEE method, but the directness claim rests on Ly=6 and may not survive larger cylinders. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The central object is the Harper-Hofstadter model at rational flux density $n_\phi = p/q$: a tight-binding model with Aharonov-Bohm phases and nearest-neighbor repulsion $V$. At $p/q$, the lowest Landau level splits into $p$ magnetic sub-bands, which lets integer sub-band filling and fractional LLL filling compete at the same particle density when $p = t$. The computational engine is infinite DMRG on a cylinder, and the decisive diagnostics are flux insertion for the Hall conductance, the entanglement spectrum and gap, the fidelity susceptibility, and the scaling of entanglement entropy with cylinder circumference measured in units of the magnetic length $\ell_B = a\sqrt{q/2\pi p}$. The methodological trick is to vary $n_\phi$ and $L_y$ together so that entropy data from several flux densities collapse onto one curve, yielding a precise topological entanglement entropy.
What would settle it
A calculation on a wider cylinder (for example $L_y = 12$ or larger) or with higher bond dimension that resolves an intermediate phase between the $C=4$ insulator and the Laughlin state, or a torus exact-diagonalization showing that the ground-state degeneracy changes through an intermediate region, would refute the direct-transition claim. Likewise, observing Hall conductance values other than 4 and 1/3 during flux insertion near $V_c$ would show the transition is not direct.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central claim is that repulsive interactions alone can induce a direct transition between an integer Chern insulator and a fractional quantum Hall state at the same particle density. At $n_\phi = 3/11$, the lowest Landau level splits into three magnetic sub-bands; the lowest band has Chern number 4, so weakly interacting fermions form a $C = +4$ integer Chern insulator. For strong repulsion, the ground state is a $\nu = 1/3$ Laughlin state, identified by a flux-pumped Hall response of 1/3 and a topological entanglement entropy of $-\ln \sqrt{3}$. The numerical signatures, including correlation-length divergence with bond dimension, a sudden opening of the entanglement gap, a restructuring of the single-particle density matrix, a fidelity-susceptibility peak, and a discontinuous jump in Hall conductance, all point to a direct transition at a critical interaction strength $V_c$, at least on a cylinder of circumference $L_y = 6$. The paper is careful to note that iDMRG on cylinders cannot unambiguously determine whether the transition is continuous or weakly first order in two dimensions.
Load-bearing premise
The simulations must faithfully represent the two-dimensional phases and the directness of the transition at the cylinder circumferences and bond dimensions used; the paper itself notes convergence difficulties near the critical point and for larger cylinders.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- Interaction strength becomes a control parameter for quantum Hall plateau transitions, complementing the usual tuning of filling factor or magnetic field.
- The transition falls outside existing composite-fermion Chern-number-changing critical theories, so new effective field theories are needed to describe it.
- Laughlin physics survives when the lowest Landau level is fragmented into several bands, broadening the class of lattice models that can host fractional Chern insulators.
- The magnetic-length scaling method reduces the computational cost of extracting topological entanglement entropy and can be applied to other flux densities.
- The indications of an intermediate phase at $n_\phi = 3/10$ suggest that the phase diagram near such transitions is richer than a single direct transition.
Reading between the lines
- If the direct transition survives in the thermodynamic limit, cold-atom or moir\'e platforms realizing the Hofstadter model could tune between integer and fractional Hall plateaus by adjusting interaction strength, a knob that is difficult to access in conventional two-dimensional electron gases.
- The observed growth of the inferred central charge with cylinder circumference hints at a critical point with a two-dimensional Fermi surface; a testable consequence would be entanglement scaling that depends on circumference and saturates only at large $L_y$.
- The joint scaling of $n_\phi$ and $L_y$ suggests a systematic route to map the Hofstadter phase diagram across many $p/q$ values, potentially revealing other direct Chern-insulator-to-Laughlin transitions whenever $p = t$.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper studies interacting fermions in the Harper-Hofstadter model at flux density n_φ = 3/11, where the lowest Landau level splits into three magnetic sub-bands. Using iDMRG on cylinders, the authors present evidence for a direct interaction-driven transition between a C = +4 integer Chern insulator and a ν = 1/3 Laughlin state. The evidence includes correlation-length growth with bond dimension, a discontinuous entanglement-gap opening, restructuring of the single-particle density matrix, a fidelity-susceptibility peak, and a jump in the pumped Hall charge from 4 to 1/3. The Laughlin phase is identified through a multi-flux-density topological entanglement entropy fit giving S_top = −0.551(15), momentum-resolved entanglement spectra with the expected counting, density correlations, and flux-pumping response. The paper also discusses the relation to composite-fermion theories and argues that the transition differs from previously studied plateau transitions because the two states belong to different Jain series.
Significance. If the direct CI-to-Laughlin transition at n_φ = 3/11 is confirmed, it would be a genuinely new type of interaction-driven plateau transition, one that cannot be described as a Chern-number change in the composite-fermion band within a single Jain sequence. This would broaden the theoretical landscape of quantum Hall plateau transitions and motivate new field-theoretic descriptions. The paper's technical contributions are also notable: the simultaneous scaling of cylinder circumference and flux density to extract topological entanglement entropy is a useful methodology, and the Laughlin-state identification is checked against external exact values (S_top = −ln√3, σ_H = 1/3) rather than fitted. At the same time, the central directness claim rests on Ly = 6 data, while the authors themselves report increasingly poor convergence for Ly = 8 and Ly = 10 and explicitly acknowledge that iDMRG cannot unambiguously determine the nature of a 2D quantum phase transition. The claim is therefore plausible but not fully secured.
major comments (3)
- [Fig. 2 and Appendix C] The direct nature of the transition between the C = +4 CI and the Laughlin state is inferred almost entirely from Ly = 6 iDMRG data. As the authors note in the Discussion and Appendix C, iDMRG on cylinders cannot unambiguously distinguish a direct transition from a sequence of transitions in 2D, convergence becomes progressively worse for Ly = 8 and Ly = 10, and at the nearby flux density n_φ = 3/10 the transition occurs via an uncharacterized intermediate phase. Because any intermediate phase whose width in V is smaller than ∼1/Ly would be missed at Ly = 6, the presented data do not secure the load-bearing claim of directness. The authors should either provide a quantitative finite-size analysis that bounds the width of a possible intermediate phase at n_φ = 3/11, or explicitly reword the central claim to state that the data are consistent with a direct transition without asserting that intermediate phases are excluded.
- [Fig. 2(f) and flux-pumping discussion] The Hall response is measured on the two sides of the transition, but near V_c the authors state that the flux-insertion procedure violates adiabaticity and cannot be reliably performed. A discontinuous jump between σ_H = 4 and σ_H = 1/3 therefore does not by itself exclude a narrow intermediate phase or a region where the Hall response is ill-defined. The claim of a direct transition requires either a treatment of the near-critical flux-pumping data or an explicit statement that the transition region is narrower than the resolution of the flux-pumping diagnostic.
- [Fig. 3 and footnote [70]] The topological entanglement entropy estimate combines data across several flux densities and excludes the p/q = 2/7, Ly = 5 outlier and all p/q ≥ 3/10. This analysis supports the existence of a Laughlin phase at n_φ = 3/11, but it does not constrain the directness of the specific transition at that flux density. The text should state this limitation explicitly wherever the TEE result is invoked in support of the transition claim, rather than presenting it as evidence for the directness of the transition.
minor comments (5)
- [Abstract and Sec. I] The phrase 'direct transition' is used in the abstract and conclusion, while the Discussion acknowledges that the data could reflect either a continuous or a weakly first-order transition; please define what 'direct' means in terms of the absence of any intermediate phase, and consistently distinguish it from the order of the transition.
- [Fig. 2 caption] Panel (a) uses bond dimensions 600–1000 while panels (b)–(f) use χ = 500; the text should state the bond dimension used for each panel at first mention to avoid ambiguity about which data are converged.
- [Fig. 2(b) and text] The definition of the entanglement gap Δξ refers to 'the same quantum number and momentum sector', but the quantum number sectors in Fig. 2(b) are labeled q = −4, …, 2; clarifying the convention for q (e.g., total particle-number sector relative to a reference filling) would improve reproducibility.
- [Discussion, last paragraph] The speculation about a 2D Fermi surface at the critical point, motivated by the growing inferred central charge, should be labeled explicitly as a speculative interpretation, especially given the non-asymptotic finite-entanglement-scaling caveats stated in Appendix C.
- [Throughout] There are minor typographical and formatting inconsistencies, including ligature-based spelling variants such as 'effect' and inconsistent use of 'density profile' versus 'density profile'; a careful proofreading pass would be helpful.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the claimed direct CI-to-Laughlin transition is an independent numerical finding benchmarked against exact Laughlin topological and Hall predictions, with prior-work CF theory used only as motivation.
full rationale
The paper's central claim is numerical evidence for a direct interaction-driven transition between a C=+4 integer Chern insulator and a nu=1/3 Laughlin state at n_phi=3/11. The load-bearing identifications are checked against external benchmarks: the topological entanglement entropy is extracted as S_topo = -0.551(15) and compared with the exact Laughlin value -ln(sqrt(3)) ≈ -0.549 (Fig. 3); the Hall response under flux insertion yields sigma_H = 1/3, compared with the Laughlin prediction (Fig. 5); and the momentum-resolved entanglement spectrum is compared with Laughlin edge counting (Fig. 4). None of these benchmarks is a fitted output used to force agreement. The composite-fermion theory cited from the authors' prior work is used as heuristic motivation for which candidate states may compete, but the iDMRG calculation is not conditioned on that theory, and no parameter is fitted to the transition location or to the Hall plateau values. The paper's own caveats, such as the Ly=6 focus, convergence difficulties at larger Ly, and the statement that iDMRG on cylinders cannot unambiguously determine the 2D transition order, are limitations on evidence strength rather than circular reductions. Self-citations to Möller & Cooper (2009, 2015) and related works appear, but they are not load-bearing in the numerical demonstration. No step of the derivation reduces by construction to its own inputs, so no circularity is found.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (1)
- Topological entanglement entropy intercept S_top =
-0.551(15)
assumptions (5)
- domain assumption Infinite-cylinder iDMRG with Ly up to 10 and χ up to 1000 approximates the 2D thermodynamic limit; missing orders and phases become visible at larger width.
- standard math The lowest Landau level manifold at nφ=p/q comprises p magnetic sub-bands with Chern numbers given by Diophantine equations.
- domain assumption The entanglement spectrum reflects the edge-mode counting of the Laughlin state via bulk-boundary correspondence.
- domain assumption CF theory predicts candidate FCI fillings ν=r/(kCr+1) in the multi-band LLL.
- ad hoc to paper Data exclusions for TEE: p/q=2/7 Ly=5 outlier and p/q≥3/10 are justified by stated deviations and cited destabilization.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Interaction-driven plateau transition between integer and fractional Chern Insulators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DQOV5A5K
@misc{pith2026190800988,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Interaction-driven plateau transition between integer and fractional Chern Insulators},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DQOV5A5K}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.00988}
}
abstract
We present numerical evidence of an interaction-driven quantum Hall plateau transition between a $|C|>1$ Chern Insulator (CI) and a $\nu = 1/3$ Laughlin state in the Harper-Hofstadter model. We study the model at flux densities $p/q$, where the lowest Landau level (LLL) manifold comprises $p$ magnetic sub-bands. For weak interactions, the model realises integer CIs corresponding to filled sub-bands, while strongly interacting candidate states include fractional quantum Hall (FQH) states at LLL filling fractions $\nu=r/t$. These phases may compete at the same particle density when $p=t$. As a concrete example, we numerically explore the physics at flux density $n_{\phi} = 3/11$, where we show evidence that a direct transition occurs between a CI and a $\nu = 1/3$ Laughlin state, which we characterise in terms of its critical, topological and entanglement properties. We also show that strong interactions generically stabilise a $\nu = 1/3$ Laughlin state even when the LLL is split into multiple bands, and introduce a powerful methodology to extract its topological entanglement entropy by exploiting the scaling of magnetic length with $n_\phi$.
Figures
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Synthetic magnetic fields for ultracold neutral atoms,
Y.-J. Lin, R. L. Compton, K. Jim´ enez-Garc´ ıa, J. V. Porto, and I. B. Spielman, “Synthetic magnetic fields for ultracold neutral atoms,” Nature 462, 628–632 (2009)
2009
-
[2]
Realization of the Hofstadter Hamil- tonian with Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices,
M Aidelsburger, M Atala, M Lohse, J T Barreiro, B Pare- des, and I Bloch, “Realization of the Hofstadter Hamil- tonian with Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 185301 (2013)
2013
-
[3]
Realizing the Harper Hamiltonian with Laser-Assisted Tunneling in Optical Lattices,
Hirokazu Miyake, Georgios A Siviloglou, Colin J Kennedy, William Cody Burton, and Wolfgang Ketterle, “Realizing the Harper Hamiltonian with Laser-Assisted Tunneling in Optical Lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 185302 (2013)
2013
-
[4]
Measuring the Chern number of Hofstadter bands with ultracold bosonic atoms,
M Aidelsburger, M Lohse, C Schweizer, M Atala, J T Barreiro, S Nascimb` ene, N R Cooper, I Bloch, and N Goldman, “Measuring the Chern number of Hofstadter bands with ultracold bosonic atoms,” Nat. Phys.11, 162– 166 (2014)
2014
-
[5]
Experimental realization of the topological Haldane model with ultracold fermions,
Gregor Jotzu, Michael Messer, R´ emi Desbuquois, Martin Lebrat, Thomas Uehlinger, Daniel Greif, and Tilman Esslinger, “Experimental realization of the topological Haldane model with ultracold fermions,” Nature 515, 237–240 (2014)
2014
-
[6]
Rapidly rotating atomic gases,
N.R. Cooper, “Rapidly rotating atomic gases,” Adv. Phys. 57, 539–616 (2008)
2008
-
[7]
Colloquium : Artificial gauge poten- tials for neutral atoms,
Jean Dalibard, Fabrice Gerbier, Gediminas Juzeli¯ unas, and Patrik ¨Ohberg, “Colloquium : Artificial gauge poten- tials for neutral atoms,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1523–1543 (2011)
work page 2011
-
[8]
Light-induced gauge fields for ultracold atoms,
N Goldman, G Juzeli¯ unas, P¨Ohberg, and I B Spielman, “Light-induced gauge fields for ultracold atoms,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 126401 (2014)
work page 2014
Show all 87 references
-
[9]
Hofstadter’s butterfly and the fractal quantum Hall effect in moir´ e superlattices,
C. R. Dean, L. Wang, P. Maher, C. Forsythe, F. Ghahari, Y. Gao, J. Katoch, M. Ishigami, P. Moon, M. Koshino, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, K. L. Shepard, J. Hone, and P. Kim, “Hofstadter’s butterfly and the fractal quantum Hall effect in moir´ e superlattices,” Nature497, 598–602 (2013)
2013
-
[10]
Observation of fractional Chern insulators in a van der Waals heterostructure,
Eric M. Spanton, Alexander A. Zibrov, Haoxin Zhou, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Michael P. Zaletel, and Andrea F. Young, “Observation of fractional Chern insulators in a van der Waals heterostructure,” Science 360, 62–66 (2018)
2018
-
[11]
A capacitance spectroscopy-based plat- form for realizing gate-defined electronic lattices,
T. Hensgens, U. Mukhopadhyay, P. Barthelemy, R. F. L. Vermeulen, R. N. Schouten, S. Fallahi, G. C. Gardner, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, M. J. Manfra, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, “A capacitance spectroscopy-based plat- form for realizing gate-defined electronic lattices,” J. Appl. ...
2018
-
[12]
Band structure engineering of 2D materials using patterned dielectric superlattices,
Carlos Forsythe, Xiaodong Zhou, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Abhay Pasupathy, Pilkyung Moon, Mikito Koshino, Philip Kim, and Cory R. Dean, “Band structure engineering of 2D materials using patterned dielectric superlattices,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 566–571 (2018)
2018
-
[13]
Fractional Chern insulator edges and layer-resolved lattice con- tacts,
Christina Knapp, Eric M. Spanton, Andrea F. Young, Chetan Nayak, and Michael P. Zaletel, “Fractional Chern insulator edges and layer-resolved lattice con- tacts,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 081114(R) (2019)
2019
-
[14]
High- Temperature Fractional Quantum Hall States,
Evelyn Tang, Jia-Wei Mei, and Xiao-Gang Wen, “High- Temperature Fractional Quantum Hall States,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 236802 (2011)
2011
-
[15]
Fractional quantum hall states at zero magnetic field,
Titus Neupert, Luiz Santos, Claudio Chamon, and Christopher Mudry, “Fractional quantum hall states at zero magnetic field,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 236804 (2011)
2011
-
[16]
Nearly flatbands with nontrivial topol- ogy,
Kai Sun, Zhengcheng Gu, Hosho Katsura, and S Das Sarma, “Nearly flatbands with nontrivial topol- ogy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 236803 (2011)
2011
-
[17]
Fractional quantum Hall effect in a periodic potential,
A. Kol and N. Read, “Fractional quantum Hall effect in a periodic potential,” Phys. Rev. B 48, 8890–8898 (1993)
1993
-
[18]
Composite fermion theory for bosonic quantum hall states on lattices,
Gunnar M¨ oller and N R Cooper, “Composite fermion theory for bosonic quantum hall states on lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 105303 (2009)
2009
-
[19]
Fractional Chern In- sulators in Harper-Hofstadter Bands with Higher Chern Number,
Gunnar M¨ oller and N. R. Cooper, “Fractional Chern In- sulators in Harper-Hofstadter Bands with Higher Chern Number,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 126401 (2015)
2015
-
[20]
Fractional Chern Insulator,
N Regnault and B. Andrei Bernevig, “Fractional Chern Insulator,” Phys. Rev. X 1, 021014 (2011)
2011
-
[21]
Topological flat band models and fractional Chern insulators,
Emil J Bergholtz and Zhao Liu, “Topological flat band models and fractional Chern insulators,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 27, 1330017 (2013)
2013
-
[22]
Fractional quantum Hall physics in topologi- cal flat bands,
Siddharth A Parameswaran, Rahul Roy, and Shivaji L Sondhi, “Fractional quantum Hall physics in topologi- cal flat bands,” Comptes Rendus Physique 14, 816–839 (2013)
2013
-
[23]
Composite-fermion approach for the fractional quantum Hall effect,
Jainendra K Jain, “Composite-fermion approach for the fractional quantum Hall effect,” Phys Rev Lett 63, 199– 202 (1989)
1989
-
[24]
Fractional quantum Hall effect and Chern-Simons gauge theories,
Ana Lopez and Eduardo Fradkin, “Fractional quantum Hall effect and Chern-Simons gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. B 44, 5246–5262 (1991)
1991
-
[25]
Nonabelions in the fractional quantum hall effect,
Gregory Moore and Nicholas Read, “Nonabelions in the fractional quantum hall effect,” Nucl. Phys. B 360, 362– 396 (1991)
1991
-
[26]
Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation,
Chetan Nayak, Steven H. Simon, Ady Stern, Michael Freedman, and Sankar Das Sarma, “Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 6 80, 1083–1159 (2008)
2008
-
[27]
Experiments on Delocalization and University in the Integral Quantum Hall Effect,
H. P. Wei, D. C. Tsui, M. A. Paalanen, and A. M. M. Pruisken, “Experiments on Delocalization and University in the Integral Quantum Hall Effect,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1294–1296 (1988)
1988
-
[28]
Crit- ical exponent in the fractional quantum Hall effect,
L. Engel, H. P. Wei, D. C. Tsui, and M. Shayegan, “Crit- ical exponent in the fractional quantum Hall effect,” Surf. Sci. 229, 13–15 (1990)
1990
-
[29]
Scaling theory of the integer quantum Hall effect,
Bodo Huckestein, “Scaling theory of the integer quantum Hall effect,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 67, 357–396 (1995)
1995
-
[30]
Continuous quantum phase transitions,
S. L. Sondhi, S. M. Girvin, J. P. Carini, and D. Sha- har, “Continuous quantum phase transitions,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 315–333 (1997)
1997
-
[31]
Percolation, quantum tunnelling and the integer Hall effect,
J T Chalker and P D Coddington, “Percolation, quantum tunnelling and the integer Hall effect,” J. Phys. C 21, 2665–2679 (1988)
1988
-
[32]
Quantization of Hall conductivity,
D.E. Khmelnitskii, “Quantization of Hall conductivity,” JETP Lett. 38, 552–556 (1983)
1983
-
[33]
Global phase diagram in the quantum Hall effect,
Steven Kivelson, Dung-Hai Lee, and Shou-Cheng Zhang, “Global phase diagram in the quantum Hall effect,” Phys. Rev. B 46, 2223–2238 (1992)
1992
-
[34]
Transitions between the quantum Hall states and insulators induced by peri- odic potentials,
Xiao-Gang Wen and Yong-Shi Wu, “Transitions between the quantum Hall states and insulators induced by peri- odic potentials,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1501–1504 (1993)
1993
-
[35]
Mott transition in an anyon gas,
Wei Chen, Matthew P. A. Fisher, and Yong-Shi Wu, “Mott transition in an anyon gas,” Phys. Rev. B 48, 13749–13761 (1993)
1993
-
[36]
Coulomb Interactions at Quantum Hall Critical Points of Systems in a Periodic Potential,
Jinwu Ye and Subir Sachdev, “Coulomb Interactions at Quantum Hall Critical Points of Systems in a Periodic Potential,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5409–5412 (1998)
1998
-
[37]
Quantum phase transition between integer quantum Hall states of bosons,
Tarun Grover and Ashvin Vishwanath, “Quantum phase transition between integer quantum Hall states of bosons,” Phys. Rev. B 87, 045129 (2013)
2013
-
[38]
Continuous transition between fractional quantum Hall and super- fluid states,
Maissam Barkeshli and John McGreevy, “Continuous transition between fractional quantum Hall and super- fluid states,” Phys. Rev. B 89, 235116 (2014)
2014
-
[39]
Contin- uous Preparation of a Fractional Chern Insulator,
M. Barkeshli, N. Y. Yao, and C. R. Laumann, “Contin- uous Preparation of a Fractional Chern Insulator,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 026802 (2015)
2015
-
[40]
Emergent Multi-Flavor QED 3 at the Plateau Transition between Fractional Chern Insulators: Applications to Graphene Heterostruc- tures,
Jong Yeon Lee, Chong Wang, Michael P. Zaletel, Ashvin Vishwanath, and Yin-Chen He, “Emergent Multi-Flavor QED 3 at the Plateau Transition between Fractional Chern Insulators: Applications to Graphene Heterostruc- tures,” Phys. Rev. X 8, 031015 (2018)
2018
-
[41]
Quantum phase tran- sitions between bosonic symmetry-protected topological phases in two dimensions: Emergent QED 3 and anyon superfluid,
Yuan-Ming Lu and Dung-Hai Lee, “Quantum phase tran- sitions between bosonic symmetry-protected topological phases in two dimensions: Emergent QED 3 and anyon superfluid,” Phys. Rev. B 89, 195143 (2014)
2014
-
[42]
Single Band Motion of Conduction Elec- trons in a Uniform Magnetic Field,
P G Harper, “Single Band Motion of Conduction Elec- trons in a Uniform Magnetic Field,” Proc. Phys. Soc. Sect. A 68, 874–878 (1955)
1955
-
[43]
Energy spectrum of a conduction electron in a magnetic field,
M Ya Azbel, “Energy spectrum of a conduction electron in a magnetic field,” Sov Phys Jetp-Ussr 19, 634–645 (1964)
1964
-
[44]
The model is described by the tight-binding Hamiltonian ˆHHof =−t ∑ ⟨ij⟩ [ eiφij ˆa† i ˆaj + H.c
[51]. The model is described by the tight-binding Hamiltonian ˆHHof =−t ∑ ⟨ij⟩ [ eiφij ˆa† i ˆaj + H.c. ] +V ∑ ⟨ij⟩ ˆniˆnj, (1) where t is the hopping amplitude. We consider fermions with nearest-neighbour repulsion V , so ˆa (ˆa†) denote fermionic annihilation (creation) oper...
1908 arXiv
-
[45]
Anomalous quantum Hall effect: An incompressible quantum fluid with fractionally charged excitations,
R. B. Laughlin, “Anomalous quantum Hall effect: An incompressible quantum fluid with fractionally charged excitations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1395–1398 (1983)
1983
-
[46]
Energy levels and wave func- tions of Bloch electrons in rational and irrational mag- netic fields,
Douglas R. Hofstadter, “Energy levels and wave func- tions of Bloch electrons in rational and irrational mag- netic fields,” Phys. Rev. B 14, 2239–2249 (1976)
1976
-
[47]
Quantum geometry and stability of the fractional quantum Hall effect in the Hofstadter model,
David Bauer, T. S. Jackson, and Rahul Roy, “Quantum geometry and stability of the fractional quantum Hall effect in the Hofstadter model,” Phys. Rev. B 93, 235133 (2016)
2016
-
[48]
Band geometry of fractional topological in- sulators,
Rahul Roy, “Band geometry of fractional topological in- sulators,” Phys. Rev. B 90, 165139 (2014)
2014
-
[49]
Adiabatic Contin- uation of Fractional Chern Insulators to Fractional Quan- tum Hall States,
Thomas Scaffidi and Gunnar M¨ oller, “Adiabatic Contin- uation of Fractional Chern Insulators to Fractional Quan- tum Hall States,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 246805 (2012)
2012
-
[50]
Stability of fractional Chern insulators in the effective continuum limit of Harper-Hofstadter bands with Chern number |C|> 1,
Bartholomew Andrews and Gunnar M¨ oller, “Stability of fractional Chern insulators in the effective continuum limit of Harper-Hofstadter bands with Chern number |C|> 1,” Phys. Rev. B 97, 035159 (2018)
2018
-
[51]
Care would have to be taken to ensure that the resulting sub-bands do not overlap and gaps open fully
Similarly, a parent Chern band could be split into mul- tiple sub-bands by applying periodic superlattice poten- tials. Care would have to be taken to ensure that the resulting sub-bands do not overlap and gaps open fully
-
[52]
Geomet- ric stability of topological lattice phases,
T S Jackson, Gunnar M¨ oller, and Rahul Roy, “Geomet- ric stability of topological lattice phases,” Nat Comm 6, 8629 (2015)
2015
-
[53]
Theory of quantised Hall conductivity in two dimensions,
P Streda, “Theory of quantised Hall conductivity in two dimensions,” J. Phys. C 15, L717 (1982)
1982
-
[54]
A Result Not Dependent on Rationality for Bloch Electrons in a Magnetic Field,
G.H. Wannier, “A Result Not Dependent on Rationality for Bloch Electrons in a Magnetic Field,” Phys. Stat. Sol. B 88, 757–765 (1978)
1978
-
[55]
Quantized Hall conductance as a topological invariant,
Qian Niu, D. J. Thouless, and Yong-Shi Wu, “Quantized Hall conductance as a topological invariant,” Phys. Rev. B 31, 3372–3377 (1985)
1985
-
[56]
Quantized hall conductance in a two- Dimensional periodic potential,
D J Thouless, Mahito Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, “Quantized hall conductance in a two- Dimensional periodic potential,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405–408 (1982)
1982
-
[57]
Density matrix formulation for quan- tum renormalization groups,
Steven R. White, “Density matrix formulation for quan- tum renormalization groups,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863– 2866 (1992)
1992
-
[58]
Hofstadter butterfly as quantum phase diagram,
D. Osadchy and J. E. Avron, “Hofstadter butterfly as quantum phase diagram,” J. Math. Phys. 42, 5665–5671 (2001)
2001
-
[59]
The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states,
Ulrich Schollw¨ ock, “The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states,” Ann. Phys. 326, 96–192 (2011)
2011
-
[60]
Infinite size density matrix renormal- ization group, revisited,
Ian P. McCulloch, “Infinite size density matrix renormal- ization group, revisited,” (2008), arXiv:0804.2509 [cond- mat.str-el]
2008 arXiv
-
[61]
Spin-Liquid Ground State of the S = 1/2 Kagome Heisenberg Antiferromagnet,
Simeng Yan, David A. Huse, and Steven R. White, “Spin-Liquid Ground State of the S = 1/2 Kagome Heisenberg Antiferromagnet,” Science 332, 1173–1176 (2011)
2011
-
[62]
Efficient nu- merical simulations with Tensor Networks: Tensor Net- work Python (TeNPy),
Johannes Hauschild and Frank Pollmann, “Efficient nu- merical simulations with Tensor Networks: Tensor Net- work Python (TeNPy),” SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 5 (2018)
2018
-
[63]
Density matrix renormalization group on a cylinder in mixed real and momentum space,
Johannes Motruk, Michael P Zaletel, Roger S K Mong, and Frank Pollmann, “Density matrix renormalization group on a cylinder in mixed real and momentum space,” Phys. Rev. B 93, 155139 (2016)
2016
-
[64]
Interaction-driven phases in the half-filled honeycomb lattice: An infinite density matrix renormalization group study,
Johannes Motruk, Adolfo G Grushin, Fernando De Juan, and Frank Pollmann, “Interaction-driven phases in the half-filled honeycomb lattice: An infinite density matrix renormalization group study,” Phys. Rev. B 92, 085147 (2015)
2015
-
[65]
Phase transi- tions and adiabatic preparation of a fractional Chern in- sulator in a boson cold-atom model,
Johannes Motruk and Frank Pollmann, “Phase transi- tions and adiabatic preparation of a fractional Chern in- sulator in a boson cold-atom model,” Phys. Rev. B 96, 7 165107 (2017)
2017
-
[66]
Fractional quan- tum Hall effect in the interacting Hofstadter model via tensor networks,
Matthias Gerster, Matteo Rizzi, Pietro Silvi, Marcello Dalmonte, and Simone Montangero, “Fractional quan- tum Hall effect in the interacting Hofstadter model via tensor networks,” Phys. Rev. B 96, 195123 (2017)
2017
-
[67]
Quantized Hall conductivity in two di- mensions,
R. B. Laughlin, “Quantized Hall conductivity in two di- mensions,” Phys. Rev. B 23, 5632–5633 (1981)
1981
-
[68]
Particle entanglement spectra for quantum Hall states on lattices,
Antoine Sterdyniak, Nicolas Regnault, and Gunnar M¨ oller, “Particle entanglement spectra for quantum Hall states on lattices,” Phys. Rev. B 86, 165314 (2012)
2012
-
[69]
Characterization and stability of a fermionic ν = 1/3 fractional Chern insulator,
Adolfo G. Grushin, Johannes Motruk, Michael P. Zaletel, and Frank Pollmann, “Characterization and stability of a fermionic ν = 1/3 fractional Chern insulator,” Phys. Rev. B 91, 035136 (2015)
2015
-
[70]
Flux insertion, entanglement, and quantized re- sponses,
Michael P Zaletel, Roger S K Mong, and Frank Poll- mann, “Flux insertion, entanglement, and quantized re- sponses,” J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2014, P10007 (2014)
2014
-
[71]
Topological Entangle- ment Entropy,
Alexei Kitaev and John Preskill, “Topological Entangle- ment Entropy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110404 (2006)
2006
-
[72]
We have also ex- cluded results for the highest flux densities,p/q≥ 3/10 as experimental results suggest the Laughlin state is desta- bilized for nφ & 0.4 [80]
We have excluded an outlier for the case of p/q = 2/7,Ly = 5, because its density profile differed signif- icantly from that of a Laughlin state. We have also ex- cluded results for the highest flux densities,p/q≥ 3/10 as experimental results suggest the Laughlin state is desta- ...
-
[73]
Entanglement scaling of fractional quantum Hall states through geometric deformations,
Andreas M. L¨ auchli, Emil J. Bergholtz, and Masudul Haque, “Entanglement scaling of fractional quantum Hall states through geometric deformations,” New J. Phys. 12, 075004 (2010)
2010
-
[74]
Entanglement entropy in fermionic laughlin states,
Masudul Haque, Oleksandr Zozulya, and Kareljan Schoutens, “Entanglement entropy in fermionic laughlin states,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 060401 (2007)
2007
-
[75]
Detection of symmetry-protected topological phases in one dimen- sion,
Frank Pollmann and Ari M Turner, “Detection of symmetry-protected topological phases in one dimen- sion,” Phys. Rev. B 86, 125441 (2012)
2012
-
[76]
Topological characterization of fractional quan- tum hall ground states from microscopic hamiltonians,
Michael P Zaletel, Roger S K Mong, and Frank Poll- mann, “Topological characterization of fractional quan- tum hall ground states from microscopic hamiltonians,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 236801 (2013)
2013
-
[77]
Entanglement Spectrum as a Generalization of Entanglement Entropy: Identifi- cation of Topological Order in Non-Abelian Fractional Quantum Hall Effect States,
Hui Li and F. D. M. Haldane, “Entanglement Spectrum as a Generalization of Entanglement Entropy: Identifi- cation of Topological Order in Non-Abelian Fractional Quantum Hall Effect States,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 010504, 1–4 (2008)
2008
-
[78]
Characterizing topological order by studying the ground states on an infinite cylin- der,
L Cincio and Guifr´ e Vidal, “Characterizing topological order by studying the ground states on an infinite cylin- der,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 067208 (2013)
2013
-
[79]
Gapless Chiral Spin Liquid Phase in Spin-1 /2 Triangular Heisenberg Model,
Shou-Shu Gong, Wayne Zheng, Mac Lee, Yuan-Ming Lu, and D. N. Sheng, “Gapless Chiral Spin Liquid Phase in Spin-1 /2 Triangular Heisenberg Model,” (2019), arXiv:1905.11560 [cond-mat.str-el]
2019 arXiv
-
[80]
General Relationship between the Entanglement Spectrum and the Edge State Spectrum of Topological Quantum States,
Xiao-Liang Qi, Hosho Katsura, and Andreas W. W. Lud- wig, “General Relationship between the Entanglement Spectrum and the Edge State Spectrum of Topological Quantum States,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 196402 (2012)
2012
-
[81]
Entanglement En- tropy and Quantum Field Theory,
Pasquale Calabrese and John Cardy, “Entanglement En- tropy and Quantum Field Theory,” J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 06002, 33 (2004)
2004
-
[82]
Fractional quantum Hall effect in optical lattices,
M. Hafezi, A. S. Sørensen, E. Demler, and M. D. Lukin, “Fractional quantum Hall effect in optical lattices,” Phys. Rev. A 76, 023613 (2007)
2007
-
[83]
Theory of finite-entanglement scaling at one-dimensional quantum critical points,
Frank Pollmann, Subroto Mukerjee, Ari M Turner, and Joel E Moore, “Theory of finite-entanglement scaling at one-dimensional quantum critical points,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 255701 (2009)
2009
-
[84]
Scaling of entanglement support for matrix product states,
L Tagliacozzo, Thiago R De Oliveira, S Iblisdir, and J I Latorre, “Scaling of entanglement support for matrix product states,” Phys. Rev. B 78, 024410 (2008)
2008
-
[85]
Dynamics of the Kitaev- Heisenberg Model,
Matthias Gohlke, Ruben Verresen, Roderich Moess- ner, and Frank Pollmann, “Dynamics of the Kitaev- Heisenberg Model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 1–7 (2017). 8 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 φext[2π] −1.0 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0.0 ⟨qR⟩ nφ 2/7 2/9 2/11 3/10 3/11 3/13 3/14 4/13 4/15 4/17 F...
2017
-
[86]
The half-filled Landau level: The case for Dirac composite fermions,
S. D. Geraedts, M. P. Zaletel, R. S. K. Mong, M. A. Metlitski, A. Vishwanath, and O. I. Motrunich, “The half-filled Landau level: The case for Dirac composite fermions,” Science 352, 197–201 (2016)
2016
-
[600]
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 (k − k0)/π 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 − log λi (a) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 (k − k0)/π (b) q −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 Figure 4
Results for cylinders of various 4 ≤ Ly≤ 10 and flux densities nφ =p/q are combined. 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 (k − k0)/π 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 − log λi (a) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 (k − k0)/π (b) q −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 Figure 4. Momentum-resolved entanglement spectrum for a bisected cylinder wit...
Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.