Tunable Electronic Structure in Gallium Chalcogenide van der Waals Compounds

Aaron Bostwick; Alex Zettl; Brian Shevitski; Chris Jozwiak; Eli Rotenberg; Hui Cai; Luca Moreschini; Roland J. Koch; Sefaattin Tongay; Shaul Aloni

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 45 references

Tunable Electronic Structure in Gallium Chalcogenide van der Waals Compounds

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Potassium dosing reshapes bulk GaSe's valence band into a monolayer-like dispersion.

desk verdict Solid ARPES measurements of GaSe and GaS_xSe_1-x alloys, with a credible alloy gap-shift result, but the headline K-decoupling claim is inferred rather than pinned down and the HRSTEM stacking assignment is internally inconsistent. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01003 v2 pith:D6V3L25T submitted 2019-08-02 cond-mat.mes-hall

Brian Shevitski , S{o}ren Ulstrup , Roland J. Koch , Hui Cai , Sefaattin Tongay , Luca Moreschini , Chris Jozwiak , Aaron Bostwick

show 3 more authors

Alex Zettl Eli Rotenberg Shaul Aloni

This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mes-hall PACS 79.60.-i71.20.-b73.20.At

keywords galliumselenidevanderWaalsmaterialsangle-resolvedphotoemissionspectroscopypotassiumintercalationmonolayerdecouplingbandgapengineeringGaSxSe1-xalloysstackingpolytypes

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the electronic structure of the layered semiconductor GaSe can be tuned by two knobs: alkali-metal dosing and sulfur alloying. Using angle-resolved photoemission, it argues that depositing potassium on a bulk crystal changes the dispersion around the valence band maximum from the bulk's single parabolic lobe into an inverted-sombrero shape, which is the signature of a single GaSe tetralayer. The authors read this as evidence that potassium decouples the top-most tetralayer from the bulk, so the surface behaves electronically like a monolayer even though the crystal is thick. The same paper shows that alloying with sulfur shifts the valence band rigidly downward and switches the stacking from AB to AA′, which tracks a blue shift in photoluminescence, implying that the gap can be engineered without disturbing the band shape.

What carries the argument

The machinery is angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy combined with photon-energy scans that map the out-of-plane momentum $k_z$, giving the full three-dimensional valence band structure and letting the authors isolate tetralayer-related dispersion. The load-bearing comparison is the inverted-sombrero band inversion at the top of the valence band: its magnitude on K-dosed GaSe, $(48 \pm 12)$ meV, is benchmarked against a calculated value of 80 meV for the monolayer and a measured value of 120 meV for monolayer GaSe on a substrate. Supporting machinery includes high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy to identify stacking phases by atomic-column intensity, core-level photoemission to track potassium-induced chemical changes and alloy composition, and photoluminescence to connect valence-band shifts to the optical gap.

What would settle it

A $k_z$-resolved ARPES scan of the K-dosed surface would settle it: if the top layer is truly decoupled, the inverted-sombrero band should show negligible dispersion along $k_z$, whereas band bending or an inner-potential shift would leave the out-of-plane dispersion essentially intact and only move the bands in energy. Alternatively, cross-sectional scanning transmission electron microscopy of the dosed crystal should reveal potassium atoms sitting in the van der Waals gap or an increased interlayer spacing; if neither is present, the decoupling claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the valence band maximum of K-dosed bulk GaSe has a dispersion inconsistent with the bulk and consistent with a single tetralayer: instead of one maximum at $\Gamma$ with effective mass $(1.1 \pm 0.2)m_0$, the dosed surface has two maxima at $\pm 0.3$ Å$^{-1}$ with effective mass $(1.7 \pm 0.2)m_0$ and a local minimum at $\Gamma$ that sits $(48 \pm 12)$ meV below them. That inverted-bow dispersion is the shape expected for monolayer GaSe, so the gap should switch from direct in the bulk to indirect in the dosed surface layer. The paper further claims that this change is caused by a strong modification of the top-most GaSe tetralayer, likely through potassium entering the van der Waals gap or reacting with the surface, leading to weaker coupling to the underlying bulk. For the alloys, the paper claims that increasing sulfur content shifts the valence band maximum to higher binding energy while leaving the dispersion and effective mass essentially unchanged, and that the alloy stacking switches from the AB (ε) sequence to the AA′ (β) sequence above roughly 30 percent sulfur.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the new dispersion seen after potassium dosing is caused by the top-most GaSe tetralayer becoming electronically decoupled from the bulk, rather than by the alternative mechanisms the paper itself lists, such as surface band bending, chemical reaction, a shift of the inner potential, or altered final-state effects.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Potassium dosing offers a route to monolayer-like electronic structure, including a likely direct-to-indirect gap transition, on a bulk crystal without exfoliating or growing a monolayer.
Sulfur alloying tunes the valence-band edge and the optical gap over a wide compositional range while leaving the dispersion and effective mass around the valence band maximum essentially unchanged.
The stacking phase of GaS$_x$Se$_{1-x}$ alloys can be selected by composition, with the AB-to-AA′ transition occurring near $x \approx 0.3$.
K-dosed GaSe degrades under prolonged synchrotron exposure, so studies of the dosed surface require gentler probes or lower photon flux than the full photon-energy scans used on pristine GaSe.
The same ARPES strategy can be applied to other layered monochalcogenides to test whether alkali dosing generically produces a decoupled top tetralayer.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If potassium decouples only the top-most tetralayer, the dosed crystal becomes a platform for studying monolayer physics on a robust bulk substrate, without transfer or encapsulation.
A direct structural test is available: imaging the K-dosed surface with scanning tunneling microscopy or cross-sectional electron microscopy should reveal potassium atoms in the van der Waals gap or an enlarged interlayer spacing, which would confirm the decoupling mechanism the paper infers from the band shape.
The inverted-sombrero criterion could be applied to other alkali metals and other III-VI chalcogenides; if the measured band-inversion energy tracks ionic radius or intercalation propensity, that would independently strengthen the decoupling interpretation.
Because potassium dosing shifts the valence band by only about 0.1 eV without populating the conduction band, an electron-doping strategy that fills the conduction band would be needed to verify the indirect-gap conclusion by directly imaging the conduction-band minimum.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

The thing to know: this paper has two genuinely useful measurements. First, the ARPES data on the kz-dependent band structure of bulk GaSe, and second, the K-dosing evolution showing the VBM dispersion changing from a parabolic bulk-like shape to an inverted sombrero. The alloy part, with a rigid VBM shift tracked against PL, is straightforward and consistent with earlier optical work. The composition analysis from core-level fits is careful, and the comparison of the 48 meV inversion against DFT (80 meV) and a prior monolayer measurement (120–150 meV) is the right way to frame it.

The soft spots are real but not fatal. The most concrete is in Sec. III A: the text assigns the trigonal (ε-phase) HRSTEM image to the high-sulfur alloy and the honeycomb (β-phase) image to pure GaSe, while the abstract and introduction assert the opposite stacking trend. That is an internal contradiction. It reads like a swapped figure or a typo, but as printed the stacking-phase claim cannot be evaluated. A referee should catch this.

The bigger conceptual issue is the causal claim about K “decoupling” the topmost tetralayer. The paper’s own Sec. III C lists alternative mechanisms: band bending, chemical reaction, inner-potential shift, final-state effects. The observed dispersion change is consistent with decoupling, and the gradual dosing evolution is suggestive, but there is no direct structural or chemical evidence of where K sits or whether the interlayer distance changes. The stress-test worry about a kz re-sampling artifact is worth stating but I think it is weaker than it sounds: the clean 94 eV data probe a zone center far from the kz=3.15 slice that shows the 150 meV bow, and shifting inner potential by enough to jump between those zones would require an implausibly large V0 change. The 48 meV vs 150 meV difference also argues against a simple re-selection. Still, the authors themselves admit the K-dosed sample prohibited photon-energy scans, so the final-state ambiguity is untested. The conclusion should be softened to match the “consistent with” language used in the results.

Who is this for? Anyone working on III-VI layered chalcogenides, ARPES of 2D materials, or alkali-metal surface doping. The alloy data alone would make it worth a cite. It deserves a real peer review; the HRSTEM error and the over-reach in the conclusion are fixable with revision, but the underlying measurements are valuable.

My read: conditional accept after revisions. Send it to review.

Best.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper combines HRSTEM, ARPES, and PL to study GaSe and GaS_xSe_{1-x} alloys. The authors report that in-situ potassium deposition on bulk GaSe transforms the valence-band dispersion from a bulk-like parabola into a bow-shaped ('inverted sombrero') dispersion reminiscent of single-layer GaSe, which they interpret as potassium decoupling the topmost GaSe tetralayer and changing the gap from direct to indirect. They also report, from HRSTEM, a sulfur-concentration-dependent phase transition from AB (ε) stacking in GaSe to AA′ (β) stacking in sulfur-rich alloys, and show from ARPES and PL that alloying rigidly shifts the VBM to higher binding energy with a corresponding blue shift of the photoluminescence, while leaving the dispersion around the VBM largely unchanged.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work is significant in two respects: it suggests a controllable, surface-based route to monolayer-like electronic structure on a bulk crystal, and it demonstrates that the electronic gap of gallium chalcogenides can be tuned by alloying without substantially altering the VBM dispersion. The paper's strengths include the systematic mapping of the kz-dependent band structure of bulk GaSe, the explicit comparison of measured band inversions against independent DFT and prior ARPES values, and the use of core-level spectroscopy to determine alloy composition. The data are presented with stated energy and momentum resolutions and with error bars on the fitted quantities. However, the causal interpretation of the potassium experiment and the internal consistency of the stacking-phase assignment need attention before the conclusions can be accepted.

major comments (3)

[Section III A and Fig. 1] The HRSTEM phase assignments are internally contradictory. The text states that Fig. 1(c) is an image of a high-sulfur alloy (x = 0.75) that shows a trigonal lattice with alternating bright and dim columns, 'consistent with the stacking geometry of the ε phase' (i.e., AB stacking). It also states that Fig. 1(g) is pure GaSe, showing a honeycomb mesh with uniform column intensity, 'consistent with AA′ stacking exhibited by the β phase.' These assignments are opposite to the phase boundary stated earlier in the same section, where the ε phase is assigned to x ≤ 0.3 and the β phase to x > 0.3. Pure GaSe should be ε, and a high-sulfur alloy should be β. As written, the evidence contradicts the claimed ε-to-β transition with increasing sulfur content, and this contradiction propagates to the abstract and conclusion. The authors must correct either the sample labels or the phase assignments, and reconcile the interpretation with the known literature phase diagram.
[Section III C and Fig. 4] The central claim that potassium 'decouples the top-most tetra-layer' is not uniquely supported by the data. The K-dosed dispersion is measured at a single photon energy (94 eV), and the paper explicitly notes in Section II that the fully K-dosed sample could not be scanned in photon energy because of beam-induced degradation. Figure 3(c) shows that bulk GaSe already displays a bow-shaped dispersion with a band inversion of (150 ± 10) meV at kz = 3.15 Å^-1, whereas a different kz slice (Fig. 3(d)) is bulk-like. If potassium deposition changes the inner potential V0 (as the authors themselves list in Section III C), the same 94 eV photon energy would probe a different kz after dosing, and the observed bow shape could be a kz re-sampling of the bulk band structure rather than true top-layer decoupling. The alternative mechanisms mentioned in Section III C — surface band bending, chemical reaction, inner-potential shift, and final-state effects — are not excluded. The measured (48 ± 12) meV inversion differs from the bulk kz-slice value, but final-state broadening or a mixture of kz states could still mimic the observation. To support the causal 'decouples' language in the abstract and conclusion, either a kz-resolved measurement of the K-dosed sample or direct structural evidence of potassium intercalation and interlayer separation is needed.
[Section III C, paragraph on band inversion] The statement that the measured (48 ± 12) meV band inversion 'compares well with a value of 80 meV obtained from recent DFT calculations' is an overstatement: the two values differ by approximately 2.7 times the stated experimental uncertainty. The disagreement may be physically meaningful (e.g., due to incomplete decoupling at the surface), but the manuscript should either quantify the comparison more carefully or discuss possible reasons for the discrepancy rather than describing it as good agreement.

minor comments (4)

[Introduction] There is a typo in Section I: 'mobilities on the order of of 0.1 cm2V−1s−1' has a duplicated 'of.'
[Fig. 6 caption and text] The alloy labels in Fig. 6(a)-(c) are given as 'GaS0.3Se0.7' and 'GaS0.7Se0.3', while the text and Fig. 5 quote compositions of x = 0.27 ± 0.05 and x = 0.61 ± 0.05. The notation should be made consistent, for example by using the fitted values in the figure labels or stating that the labels are nominal values.
[Fig. 6 panel (c)] The vertical-axis label 'E_nib' in Fig. 6(c) appears to be a typo for 'E_bin' (or 'Binding energy').
[Section III A] The sentence 'The β and ε phases are thought to co-exist for intermediate sulfur content (0.15 < x < 0.35)' is followed by 'our samples do not show experimental evidence for this theory'; the latter phrase is vague and would be more informative if the authors stated, for example, that all measured intermediate-composition samples fell into a single phase or that no phase coexistence was observed within the resolution of the measurements.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the K-dosing and alloying conclusions are benchmarked against independent DFT, prior ARPES, PL and HRSTEM data; the few self-citations are background, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are measurements compared with external benchmarks. The K-dosed band inversion of (48 ± 12) meV is compared with 80 meV from independent DFT (Ref. 40) and with 120–150 meV from prior monolayer ARPES, none of which are outputs of the present fit. The inner potential V0 = 10.2 eV is fitted to the kz periodicity, but it is used only to label bulk kz slices and does not enter the K-dosing or alloying conclusions. The alloy VBM shifts and PL blueshift are correlated independently, and the ε-to-β stacking assignment rests on HRSTEM images interpreted via known stacking geometry. The self-citations (Refs. 36, 42, 44, 45, involving Bostwick/Rotenberg) are used only as background examples of kz intensity suppression, alkali intercalation, and graphene multilayer decoupling; they are not used to prove the GaSe decoupling claim. The paper explicitly acknowledges in Sec. II that beam damage led to 'broadening and significant deterioration of the quality of the spectral features, preventing detailed photon energy or angle scans for the K-dosed samples,' and Sec. III C lists alternative mechanisms such as surface band bending, chemical reaction, inner-potential shift, and final-state effects. Those caveats make the causal 'decouples' interpretation less than uniquely established, but that is an experimental-completeness concern, not a circular derivation. No equation or fitted parameter is reused as a predicted output.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central interpretation rests on standard ARPES assumptions (free-electron final state, constant inner potential) and on external DFT and ARPES benchmarks for monolayer GaSe. The stacking-phase identification relies on a Z-contrast interpretation of HRSTEM that is not calibrated with simulations. The alloy compositions are measured by core-level fitting rather than independent elemental analysis. One fitted parameter, the inner potential V0 = 10.2 eV, enters the kz mapping. No invented entities are required.

free parameters (1)

Inner potential V0 = 10.2 eV
Fitted to make the measured kz periodicity (2π/c with c = 15.96 Å) match the bulk Brillouin zone. It sets the kz scale in Fig. 3 and is used for all photon-energy-dependent ARPES maps; it is a fit, not an independent measurement.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Free-electron final-state approximation with constant inner potential V0 relates photoelectron kinetic energy to out-of-plane momentum kz.
Invoked in Sec. II for all kz assignments. Standard in ARPES but an approximation that can shift kz positions and alter intensity interpretations, including the kz = 3.15 Å⁻¹ slice used for comparison with the K-dosed dispersion.
domain assumption The monolayer GaSe valence band has the 'inverted sombrero' shape with inversion energy around 80 meV from DFT and 120 to 150 meV from ARPES on supported monolayers.
Used in Sec. III C to identify the K-dosed dispersion as monolayer-like. The paper does not compute the band structure itself; it relies on Refs. 13, 40, and 41.
domain assumption HRSTEM intensity of atomic columns is directly proportional to the number of atoms in the column (Z-contrast), so alternating bright and dim columns identify AB stacking and uniform columns identify AA' stacking.
Used in Sec. III A to assign ε vs β phases in Fig. 1. No multislice image simulation or contrast calibration is presented, and the text assigns the images in a way that contradicts the stated phase trend.
domain assumption Alloy composition x is obtained from the ratio of Se 3p and S 2p core-level spectral weights with Doniach-Sunjic fits.
Used in Sec. III D to determine x = 0.27 ± 0.05 and x = 0.61 ± 0.05. Assumes similar cross sections and no differential attenuation; independent verification is only mentioned for Se 3d, not shown.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tunable Electronic Structure in Gallium Chalcogenide van der Waals Compounds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/D6V3L25T

@misc{pith2026190801003,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tunable Electronic Structure in Gallium Chalcogenide van der Waals Compounds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/D6V3L25T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01003}
}

abstract

Transition metal monochalcogenides comprise a class of two-dimensional materials with electronic band gaps that are highly sensitive to material thickness and chemical composition. Here, we explore the tunability of the electronic excitation spectrum in GaSe using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. The electronic structure of the material is modified by $\textit{in-situ}$ potassium deposition as well as by forming GaS$_{x}$Se$_{1-x}$ alloy compounds. We find that potassium decouples the top-most tetra-layer of the GaSe unit cell, leading to a substantial change of the dispersion around the valence band maximum (VBM). The observed band dispersion of a single tetralayer is consistent with a transition from the direct gap character of the bulk to the indirect gap character expected for monolayer GaSe. Upon alloying with sulfur, we observe a phase transition from AB to $\text{AA}^{\prime}$ stacking. Alloying also results in a rigid energy shift of the VBM towards higher binding energies which correlates with a blue shift in the luminescence. The increase of the band gap upon sulfur alloying does not appear to change the dispersion or character of the VBM appreciably, implying that it is possible to engineer the gap of these materials while maintaining their salient electronic properties.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.01003 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. (color online) ARPES measurements at a photon energy of 94 eV of the electronic structure of pristine GaSe around [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. (color online) ARPES measurements of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (color online) Effect of K dosing on the GaSe elec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. (color online) VBM and PL peaks positions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

[1]

Wasala , author H

author author M. Wasala , author H. I. \ Sirikumara , author Y. Raj Sapkota , author S. Hofer , author D. Mazumdar , author T. Jayasekera , \ and\ author S. Talapatra ,\ 10.1039/C7TC02866K journal journal J. Mater. Chem. C \ volume 5 ,\ pages 11214 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1039/c7tc02866k
[2]

author author K. S. \ Novoselov , author A. K. \ Geim , author S. V. \ Morozov , author D. Jiang , author Y. Zhang , author S. V. \ Dubonos , author I. V. \ Grigorieva , \ and\ author A. A. \ Firsov ,\ 10.1126/science.1102896 journal journal Science \ volume 306 ,\ pages 666 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

doi:10.1126/science.1102896
[3]

Feng , author X

author author J. Feng , author X. Sun , author C. Wu , author L. Peng , author C. Lin , author S. Hu , author J. Yang , \ and\ author Y. Xie ,\ 10.1021/ja207176c journal journal Journal of the American Chemical Society \ volume 133 ,\ pages 17832 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1021/ja207176c
[4]

author author K. F. \ Mak , author C. Lee , author J. Hone , author J. Shan , \ and\ author T. F. \ Heinz ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 105 ,\ pages 136805 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

work page 2010
[5]

Splendiani , author L

author author A. Splendiani , author L. Sun , author Y. Zhang , author T. Li , author J. Kim , author C.-Y. \ Chim , author G. Galli , \ and\ author F. Wang ,\ @noop journal journal Nano Lett. \ volume 10 ,\ pages 1271 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

work page 2010
[6]

Watanabe , author T

author author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , \ and\ author H. Kanda ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Mater. \ volume 3 ,\ pages 404 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

work page 2004
[7]

Guillam \'o n , author H

author author I. Guillam \'o n , author H. Suderow , author S. Vieira , author L. Cario , author P. Diener , \ and\ author P. Rodi \`e re ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 101 ,\ pages 166407 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

work page 2008
[8]

Navarro-Moratalla , author J

author author E. Navarro-Moratalla , author J. O. \ Island , author S. Ma \ n as-Valero , author E. Pinilla-Cienfuegos , author A. Castellanos-Gomez , author J. Quereda , author G. Rubio-Bollinger , author L. Chirolli , author J. A. \ Silva-Guill \'e n , author N. Agra \" t , author G. A. \ Steele , author F. Guinea , author H. S. J. \ van der Zant , \ an...

work page 2016

Show all 45 references

[9]

author author M. M. \ Ugeda , author A. J. \ Bradley , author Y. Zhang , author S. Onishi , author Y. Chen , author W. Ruan , author C. Ojeda-Aristizabal , author H. Ryu , author M. T. \ Edmonds , author H.-Z. \ Tsai , author A. Riss , author S.-K. \ Mo , author D. Lee , autho...

2015
[10]

Liu , author S

author author G. Liu , author S. Rumyantsev , author M. A. \ Bloodgood , author T. T. \ Salguero , \ and\ author A. A. \ Balandin ,\ @noop journal journal Nano Lett. \ ( year 2018 ) NoStop

2018
[11]

Xi , author L

author author X. Xi , author L. Zhao , author Z. Wang , author H. Berger , author L. Forr \'o , author J. Shan , \ and\ author K. F. \ Mak ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Nanotechnol. \ volume 10 ,\ pages 765 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

2015
[12]

Choi , author N

author author W. Choi , author N. Choudhary , author G. H. \ Han , author J. Park , author D. Akinwande , \ and\ author Y. H. \ Lee ,\ @noop journal journal Materials Today \ volume 20 ,\ pages 116 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

2017
[13]

author author D. V. \ Rybkovskiy , author A. V. \ Osadchy , \ and\ author E. D. \ Obraztsova ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter \ volume 90 ,\ pages 235302 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

2014
[14]

Cai , author E

author author H. Cai , author E. Soignard , author C. Ataca , author B. Chen , author C. Ko , author T. Aoki , author A. Pant , author X. Meng , author S. Yang , author J. Grossman , author F. D. \ Ogletree , \ and\ author S. Tongay ,\ @noop journal journal Advanced Materials ...

2016
[15]

Robertson ,\ @noop journal journal J

author author J. Robertson ,\ @noop journal journal J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. \ volume 12 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

2001
[16]

Lei , author L

author author S. Lei , author L. Ge , author Z. Liu , author S. Najmaei , author G. Shi , author G. You , author J. Lou , author R. Vajtai , \ and\ author P. M. \ Ajayan ,\ @noop journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 13 ,\ pages 2777 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

2013
[17]

Ben Aziza , author D

author author Z. Ben Aziza , author D. Pierucci , author H. Henck , author M. G. \ Silly , author C. David , author M. Yoon , author F. Sirotti , author K. Xiao , author M. Eddrief , author J.-C. \ Girard , \ and\ author A. Ouerghi ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volum...

2017
[18]

Hu , author Z

author author P. Hu , author Z. Wen , author L. Wang , author P. Tan , \ and\ author K. Xiao ,\ @noop journal journal ACS Nano \ volume 6 ,\ pages 5988 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

2012
[19]

Zhou , author Y

author author Y. Zhou , author Y. Nie , author Y. Liu , author K. Yan , author J. Hong , author C. Jin , author Y. Zhou , author J. Yin , author Z. Liu , \ and\ author H. Peng ,\ @noop journal journal ACS Nano \ volume 8 ,\ pages 1485 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

2014
[20]

author author D. J. \ Late , author B. Liu , author J. Luo , author A. Yan , author H. S. S. R. \ Matte , author M. Grayson , author C. N. R. \ Rao , \ and\ author V. P. \ Dravid ,\ @noop journal journal Advanced Materials \ volume 24 ,\ pages 3549 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

2012
[21]

Serizawa , author Y

author author H. Serizawa , author Y. Sasaki , \ and\ author Y. Nishina ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of the Physical Society of Japan \ volume 48 ,\ pages 490 ( year 1980 ) NoStop

1980
[22]

author author C. S. \ Jung , author F. Shojaei , author K. Park , author J. Y. \ Oh , author H. S. \ Im , author D. M. \ Jang , author J. Park , \ and\ author H. S. \ Kang ,\ 10.1021/acsnano.5b04876 journal journal ACS Nano \ ( year 2015 ),\ 10.1021/acsnano.5b04876 NoStop

doi
[23]

Chen , author Y

author author H. Chen , author Y. Li , author L. Huang , \ and\ author J. Li ,\ 10.1039/C5RA08329J journal journal Rsc Adv \ volume 5 ,\ pages 50883 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

2015 doi
[24]

Del Pozo-Zamudio , author S

author author O. Del Pozo-Zamudio , author S. Schwarz , author M. Sich , author I. A. \ Akimov , author M. Bayer , author R. C. \ Schofield , author E. A. \ Chekhovich , author B. J. \ Robinson , author N. D. \ Kay , author O. V. \ Kolosov , author A. I. \ Dmitriev , author G....

2015
[25]

Kim , author C

author author W. Kim , author C. Li , author F. A. \ Chaves , author D. Jiménez , author R. D. \ Rodriguez , author J. Susoma , author M. A. \ Fenner , author H. Lipsanen , \ and\ author J. Riikonen ,\ @noop journal journal Advanced Materials \ volume 28 ,\ pages 1845 ( year 2...

2016
[26]

Ben Aziza , author H

author author Z. Ben Aziza , author H. Henck , author D. Pierucci , author M. G. \ Silly , author E. Lhuillier , author G. Patriarche , author F. Sirotti , author M. Eddrief , \ and\ author A. Ouerghi ,\ @noop journal journal ACS Nano \ ( year 2016 ) NoStop

2016
[27]

Li , author L

author author X. Li , author L. Basile , author B. Huang , author C. Ma , author J. Lee , author I. Vlassiouk , author A. Puretzky , author M. Lin , author M. Yoon , author M. Chi , author J. Idrobo , author C. Rouleau , author B. Sumpter , author D. Geohegan , \ and\ author K...

doi
[28]

Ni , author H

author author Y. Ni , author H. Wu , author C. Huang , author M. Mao , author Z. Wang , \ and\ author X. Cheng ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Crystal Growth \ volume 381 ,\ pages 10 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

2013
[29]

H\"ufner ,\ @noop title Photoelectron Spectroscopy ,\ edition 3rd \ ed.\ ( publisher Springer ,\ address Berlin ,\ year 2003 ) NoStop

author author S. H\"ufner ,\ @noop title Photoelectron Spectroscopy ,\ edition 3rd \ ed.\ ( publisher Springer ,\ address Berlin ,\ year 2003 ) NoStop

2003
[30]

Whitehouse \ and\ author A

author author C. Whitehouse \ and\ author A. Balchin ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Materials Science \ volume 13 ,\ pages 2394 ( year 1978 ) NoStop

1978
[31]

Terhell , author V

author author J. Terhell , author V. Brabers , \ and\ author G. van Egmond ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Solid State Chemistry \ volume 41 ,\ pages 97 ( year 1982 ) NoStop

1982
[32]

Arancia , author M

author author G. Arancia , author M. Grandolfo , author C. Manfredotti , \ and\ author A. Rizzo ,\ @noop journal journal physica status solidi (a) \ volume 33 ,\ pages 563 ( year 1976 ) NoStop

1976
[33]

Olgu \'i n , author A

author author D. Olgu \'i n , author A. Rubio-Ponce , \ and\ author A. Cantarero ,\ 10.1140/epjb/e2013-40141-1 journal journal Eur. Phys. J. B \ volume 86 ,\ pages 350 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

2013 doi
[34]

Plucinski , author R

author author L. Plucinski , author R. Johnson , author B. Kowalski , author K. Kopalko , author B. Orlowski , author Z. Kovalyuk , \ and\ author G. Lashkarev ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 68 ,\ pages 125304 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

2003
[35]

author author E. L. \ Shirley , author L. J. \ Terminello , author A. Santoni , \ and\ author F. J. \ Himpsel ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.13614 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 51 ,\ pages 13614 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

1995 doi
[36]

Mucha-Kruczy\'nski , author O

author author M. Mucha-Kruczy\'nski , author O. Tsyplyatyev , author A. Grishin , author E. McCann , author V. I. \ Fal'ko , author A. Bostwick , \ and\ author E. Rotenberg ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.195403 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 77 ,\ pages 195403 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

doi
[37]

Camara , author A

author author M. Camara , author A. Mauger , \ and\ author I. Devos ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 65 ,\ pages 125206 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

2002
[38]

Nagel , author A

author author S. Nagel , author A. Baldereschi , \ and\ author K. Maschke ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics \ volume 12 ,\ pages 1625 ( year 1979 ) NoStop

1979
[39]

Rybkovskiy , author N

author author D. Rybkovskiy , author N. Arutyunyan , author A. Orekhov , author I. Gromchenko , author I. Vorobiev , author A. Osadchy , author E. Y. \ Salaev , author T. Baykara , author K. Allakhverdiev , \ and\ author E. Obraztsova ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review B...

2011
[40]

Ben Aziza , author V

author author Z. Ben Aziza , author V. Zólyomi , author H. Henck , author D. Pierucci , author M. G. \ Silly , author J. Avila , author S. J. \ Magorrian , author J. Chaste , author C. Chen , author M. Yoon , author K. Xiao , author F. Sirotti , author M. C. \ Asensio , author...

doi
[41]

\ Chen , author H

author author M.-W. \ Chen , author H. Kim , author D. Ovchinnikov , author A. Kuc , author T. Heine , author O. Renault , \ and\ author A. Kis ,\ 10.1038/s41699-017-0047-x journal journal npj 2D Materials and Applications \ ,\ pages 1 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

doi
[42]

Rossnagel , author E

author author K. Rossnagel , author E. Rotenberg , author H. Koh , author N. V. \ Smith , \ and\ author L. Kipp ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 95 ,\ pages 126403 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

2005
[43]

Eknapakul , author P

author author T. Eknapakul , author P. D. C. \ King , author M. Asakawa , author P. Buaphet , author R.-H. \ He , author S.-K. \ Mo , author H. Takagi , author K. M. \ Shen , author F. Baumberger , author T. Sasagawa , author S. Jungthawan , \ and\ author W. Meevasana ,\ 10.10...

doi
[44]

Ohta , author A

author author T. Ohta , author A. Bostwick , author T. Seyller , author K. Horn , \ and\ author E. Rotenberg ,\ 10.1126/science.1130681 journal journal Science \ volume 313 ,\ pages 951 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

2006 doi
[45]

Ohta , author A

author author T. Ohta , author A. Bostwick , author J. L. \ McChesney , author T. Seyller , author K. Horn , \ and\ author E. Rotenberg ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.206802 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 98 ,\ eid 206802 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Wasala , author H

author author M. Wasala , author H. I. \ Sirikumara , author Y. Raj Sapkota , author S. Hofer , author D. Mazumdar , author T. Jayasekera , \ and\ author S. Talapatra ,\ 10.1039/C7TC02866K journal journal J. Mater. Chem. C \ volume 5 ,\ pages 11214 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1039/c7tc02866k

[2] [2]

author author K. S. \ Novoselov , author A. K. \ Geim , author S. V. \ Morozov , author D. Jiang , author Y. Zhang , author S. V. \ Dubonos , author I. V. \ Grigorieva , \ and\ author A. A. \ Firsov ,\ 10.1126/science.1102896 journal journal Science \ volume 306 ,\ pages 666 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

doi:10.1126/science.1102896

[3] [3]

Feng , author X

author author J. Feng , author X. Sun , author C. Wu , author L. Peng , author C. Lin , author S. Hu , author J. Yang , \ and\ author Y. Xie ,\ 10.1021/ja207176c journal journal Journal of the American Chemical Society \ volume 133 ,\ pages 17832 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1021/ja207176c

[4] [4]

author author K. F. \ Mak , author C. Lee , author J. Hone , author J. Shan , \ and\ author T. F. \ Heinz ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 105 ,\ pages 136805 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

work page 2010

[5] [5]

Splendiani , author L

author author A. Splendiani , author L. Sun , author Y. Zhang , author T. Li , author J. Kim , author C.-Y. \ Chim , author G. Galli , \ and\ author F. Wang ,\ @noop journal journal Nano Lett. \ volume 10 ,\ pages 1271 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

work page 2010

[6] [6]

Watanabe , author T

author author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , \ and\ author H. Kanda ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Mater. \ volume 3 ,\ pages 404 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

work page 2004

[7] [7]

Guillam \'o n , author H

author author I. Guillam \'o n , author H. Suderow , author S. Vieira , author L. Cario , author P. Diener , \ and\ author P. Rodi \`e re ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 101 ,\ pages 166407 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

work page 2008

[8] [8]

Navarro-Moratalla , author J

author author E. Navarro-Moratalla , author J. O. \ Island , author S. Ma \ n as-Valero , author E. Pinilla-Cienfuegos , author A. Castellanos-Gomez , author J. Quereda , author G. Rubio-Bollinger , author L. Chirolli , author J. A. \ Silva-Guill \'e n , author N. Agra \" t , author G. A. \ Steele , author F. Guinea , author H. S. J. \ van der Zant , \ an...

work page 2016