Pith. sign in

REVIEW 43 references

High-dimensional quantum teleportation under noisy environments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1908.01097 v4 pith:DZZ3MYON submitted 2019-08-03 quant-ph

Alejandro Fonseca This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords noiseteleportationfidelityarbitraryaveragederivedifferentfour
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We study the protocol of qudit teleportation using quantum systems subjected to several kinds of noise for arbitrary dimensionality $d$. We consider four classes of noise: dit-flip, $d$-phase-flip, dit-phase-flip and depolarizing, each of them corresponding to a family of Weyl operators, introduced via Kraus formalism. We derive a general expression for the average fidelity of teleportation in arbitrary dimension $d$ for any combination of noise on the involved qudits. Under a different approach we derive the average fidelity of teleportation for a more general scenario involving the $d$-dimensional generalization of amplitude damping noise as well. We show that all possible scenarios may be classified in four different behaviours and discuss the cases in which it is possible to improve the fidelity by increasing the associated noise fractions. All our results are in agreement with previous analysis by Fortes and Rigolin for the case of qubits (Phys. Rev. A, 92 012338, 2015).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    In this way, the squared noise coefficient reads a2 jk =a2 0δj,0δk,0 +a2 fδj,0 d−1∑ n=1 δk,n + +a2 pδk,0 d−1∑ m=1 δj,m +a2 c d−1∑ m,n=1 δj,mδk,n

    Weyl-like noises The noise coefficient associated to the input qudit ajk may be expressed as a superposition of the contributions of each region in figure 3: a0, noiseless region (green);af, flip region (blue);ap, phase flip region (yellow) andac for the region of combination of flip and phase-flip (red). In this way, the squared noise coefficient reads a2 jk =a2 ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Substituting Eq

    Kraus operators in the standard computational basis Let us calculate the fidelity of teleportation. Substituting Eq. 10 in Eq. 3, we have F = ∑ jkmnµν n1n2p1p2 k1k2k3 αmα∗ nαn1α∗ p1βjµβ∗ kµγn2γ∗ p2ωµ(n−m) d a(k1) k,n1 b(k2) k⊕ν,n2 c(k3) n⊕ν,n2a(k1)∗ j,p1 b(k2)∗ j⊕ν,p2c(k3)∗ m⊕ν,p2. Analogously to the previous treatment, using the results of Appendix B and ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Banaszek, Phys

    K. Banaszek, Phys. Rev. A 62, 024301 (2000)

    work page 2000

  4. [4]

    C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Cr´ epeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993)

    1993

  5. [5]

    Pirandola, J

    S. Pirandola, J. Eisert, C. Weedbrook, A. Furusawa, and S. L. Braunstein, Nature photonics 9, 641 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Fortes and G

    R. Fortes and G. Rigolin, Phys. Rev. A 92, 012338 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Furthermore it was possible to note that it is possible to partially correct errors by a basis change, for a very specific case ( P, ∅, ∅)

    And iv) the corresponding to any kind of noise in the input and Amplitude damping in the channel, depicted in Figure 8. Furthermore it was possible to note that it is possible to partially correct errors by a basis change, for a very specific case ( P, ∅, ∅). It is left as an open question whether considering special scenarios in which the nature of the in...

    work page

  8. [8]

    B. G. Taketani, F. de Melo, and R. L. de Matos Filho, Phys. Rev. A 85, 020301 (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    S. Oh, S. Lee, and H.-w. Lee, Physical Review A 66, 022316 (2002)

    2002

  2. [10]

    L. T. Knoll, C. T. Schmiegelow, and M. A. Larotonda, Phys. Rev. A 90, 042332 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    X. Hu, Y. Gu, Q. Gong, and G. Guo, Phys. Rev. A 81, 054302 (2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    M. M. Cunha, E. A. Fonseca, M. Moreno, and F. Parisio, Quantum Information Processing 16, 254 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    M. G. M. Moreno, A. Fonseca, and M. M. Cunha, Quantum Information Processing 17, 191 (2018), arXiv:arXiv:1805.06517v1

    2018 arXiv

  6. [14]

    N. J. Cerf, M. Bourennane, A. Karlsson, and N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 127902 (2002)

    2002

  7. [15]

    T. Durt, D. Kaszlikowski, J.-L. Chen, and L. C. Kwek, Phys. Rev. A 69, 032313 (2004)

    2004

  8. [16]

    V´ ertesi, S

    T. V´ ertesi, S. Pironio, and N. Brunner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 060401 (2010)

    2010

  9. [17]

    N. T. Islam, C. C. W. Lim, C. Cahall, J. Kim, and D. J. Gauthier, Science advances 3, e1701491 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    Skrzypczyk and D

    P. Skrzypczyk and D. Cavalcanti, Physical Review Let- ters 120, 260401 (2018), arXiv:1803.05199

    2018 arXiv

  11. [19]

    X.-M. Hu, C. Zhang, B.-H. Liu, Y.-F. Huang, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.12249 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Luo, H.-S

    Y.-H. Luo, H.-S. Zhong, M. Erhard, X.-L. Wang, L.- C. Peng, M. Krenn, X. Jiang, L. Li, N.-L. Liu, C.-Y. Lu, A. Zeilinger, and J.-W. Pan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 070505 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    M. Kues, C. Reimer, P. Roztocki, L. R. Cort´ es, S. Sciara, B. Wetzel, Y. Zhang, A. Cino, S. T. Chu, B. E. Little, et al., Nature 546, 622 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    R. A. Bertlmann and P. Krammer, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 41, 235303 (2008)

    2008

  15. [23]

    Horodecki, P

    M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 60, 1888 (1999), arXiv:9807091 [quant-ph]

    1999

  16. [24]

    Weinar, W

    R. Weinar, W. Laskowski, and M. Pawowski, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 46, 435301 (2013)

    2013

  17. [25]

    Note that this parametrization does not cover uniformly the space of pure states for two-qudits

    We produced random states uniformly distributed in the basis {|00⟩,|11⟩,···| d− 1,d− 1⟩}. Note that this parametrization does not cover uniformly the space of pure states for two-qudits. Nevertheless for our purposes it is enough

  18. [26]

    Cavalcanti, P

    D. Cavalcanti, P. Skrzypczyk, and I. ˇSupi´ c, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 110501 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Carvacho, F

    G. Carvacho, F. Andreoli, L. Santodonato, M. Ben- tivegna, V. D’Ambrosio, P. Skrzypczyk, I.ˇSupi´ c, D. Cav- alcanti, and F. Sciarrino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 140501 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    ˇSupi´ c, P

    I. ˇSupi´ c, P. Skrzypczyk, and D. Cavalcanti, Physical Review A 99, 032334 (2019), arXiv:1804.10612

    2019 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Horodecki, P

    M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Physical Review Letters 80, 5239 (1998)

    1998

  22. [30]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information (Cambridge university press, 2010)

    2010

  23. [31]

    Ramzan, Quantum Information Processing 12, 577 (2013)

    M. Ramzan, Quantum Information Processing 12, 577 (2013)

    2013

  24. [32]

    Chrusci´ nski and F

    D. Chrusci´ nski and F. A. Wudarski, Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 91, 012104 (2015), arXiv:1408.1792

    2015 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Imany, J

    P. Imany, J. A. Jaramillo-Villegas, M. S. Alshaykh, J. M. Lukens, O. D. Odele, A. J. Moore, D. E. Leaird, M. Qi, and A. M. Weiner, npj Quantum Information 5, 59 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Gokhale, J

    P. Gokhale, J. M. Baker, C. Duckering, N. C. Brown, K. R. Brown, and F. T. Chong, in Proceedings of the 46th International Symposium on Computer Architecture - ISCA ’19 (ACM Press, New York, New York, USA,

  27. [35]

    Here we refer to a protected qudit as one whose probabil- ity of being affected by any kind of noise is negligible in comparison with that corresponding to other components in the system

  28. [36]

    Miller, T

    D. Miller, T. Holz, H. Kampermann, and D. Bruß, Phys- ical Review A 98, 052316 (2018), arXiv:1807.06030

    2018 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Daniel Gottesman, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 10, 1749 (1999)

    1999

  30. [38]

    Dutta, J

    A. Dutta, J. Ryu, W. Laskowski, and M. ukowski, Physics Letters A 380, 2191 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    ˙Zyczkowski and H.-J

    K. ˙Zyczkowski and H.-J. Sommers, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 34, 7111 (2001)

    2001

  32. [40]

    E. M. Laine, H. P. Breuer, and J. Piilo, Scientific Reports 4, 4620 (2014)

    2014

  33. [41]

    C. M. Caves, Measures and volumes for spheres, the prob- ability simplex, projective Hilbert space, and density op- erators, Tech. Rep. (University of New Mexico, 2001)

    2001

  34. [42]

    Bengtsson and K

    I. Bengtsson and K. Zyczkowski, Geometry of quantum states: an introduction to quantum entanglement (Cam- bridge University Press, 2007)

    2007

  35. [2019]

    554–566, arXiv:1905.10481

    pp. 554–566, arXiv:1905.10481

    1905 arXiv

Pith tools