Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 40 references

Spectral and orbital survey of medium-sized meteoroids

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Centimeter- to decimeter-sized meteoroids show higher sodium and a far lower iron fraction than millimeter-sized meteoroids.

desk verdict First cm-dm meteor spectral survey worth serious attention, but the headline Na/Mg size trend is an inference across an uncalibrated instrument/size gap, not a direct observation. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01565 v2 pith:DOUYOTBL submitted 2019-08-05 astro-ph.EP

Pavol Matlovič , Juraj Tóth , Regina Rudawska , Leonard Kornoš , Adriana Pisarčíková This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords meteorspectroscopymeteoroidcompositionsodiumdepletionspaceweatheringironmeteoroidsstreamsNa/MgratioAMOSnetwork
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that meteoroid size controls how much volatile material survives in the body before it enters Earth's atmosphere. From 202 meteor spectra of mm- to dm-sized bodies observed by the AMOS network, it reports an overall increase in the Na/Mg intensity ratio compared with earlier surveys of mm-sized meteoroids, which it attributes to weaker space weathering and better preservation of sodium in larger bodies. It also reports that only about 0.5% of these medium-sized meteoroids are pure iron, in contrast to roughly 14% among mm-sized bodies, and concludes that most asteroidal meteoroids at these sizes are chondritic. If correct, the result would resolve the apparent dominance of iron meteoroids among small asteroidal meteoroids and would mean that surveys of different meteoroid sizes cannot be merged without accounting for a size-dependent composition shift. The same data set ties spectral classes to orbital families and stream heterogeneity, connecting composition to thermal history and parent-body structure.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the low-resolution spectral classification of meteor emission lines, which places each meteor on a ternary diagram according to the relative intensities of the Mg I-2, Na I-1, and Fe I-15 multiplets, with the expected chondritic position modelled as a function of meteor speed through a thermal equilibrium plasma model. Applying this classification, originally developed for fainter meteors, to brighter and larger meteoroids and comparing the two populations in the same Na/Mg/Fe space is what produces the size-dependence claim. The supporting apparatus includes the AMOS-Spec all-sky video spectrograph, Gaussian synthetic-spectrum fitting with atmospheric-line subtraction, empirical strength parameters $K_B$ and $P_E$ derived from beginning and terminal heights, and Tisserand-parameter grouping of orbits into asteroidal, Jupiter-family, and Halley-type classes.

What would settle it

Cross-calibrate the two surveys by observing the same meteor simultaneously with AMOS-Spec and the instrument used in the Borovička et al. (2005) survey and reducing both through one pipeline; if the Na/Mg offset between size populations disappears, the size trend is instrumental rather than compositional. In the laboratory, ablating chondritic and iron meteorite samples at controlled grain sizes under simulated meteor conditions could test whether larger bodies reproduce the observed sodium increase without invoking space weathering.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery claimed is a size-dependent compositional difference between mm-sized and cm- to dm-sized meteoroids, read from emission-line ratios. Comparing the AMOS-Spec sample of brighter meteors (-1 to -14 mag) with the fainter sample of Borovička et al. (2005), the paper finds an overall increase in the Na/Mg intensity ratio and a drop in Na-poor and Na-free meteoroids from about 34% to 11.5%, which it interprets as weaker space weathering and better volatile preservation in larger bodies. It reports only one pure iron meteoroid in 202 spectra, about 0.5%, versus roughly 14% in the mm-sized survey, and introduces a new Fe-rich spectral class between normal chondritic and iron compositions. On these grounds the paper concludes that most cm- to dm-sized meteoroids on asteroidal orbits are chondritic, consistent with main-belt transport models; the abundant mm-sized iron meteoroids must then be a size-specific phenomenon tied to the formation or ablation of small iron–nickel grains. Orbital and material-strength data for 146 meteoroids further show that Na-depleted bodies are among the strongest materials and that individual meteoroid streams such as Perseids, α-Capricornids, and δ-Aquarids are compositionally heterogeneous.

Load-bearing premise

The size-dependence conclusion collapses if the thermal-equilibrium plasma model calibrated on fainter meteors does not transfer to these brighter meteors, or if the AMOS-Spec intensity ratios are not directly comparable with those of the earlier millimeter-sized survey.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Spectral surveys across different magnitude ranges are not directly comparable without a size-dependent sodium correction.
  • The near-absence of iron meteoroids at cm-dm sizes means the abundant small iron meteoroids must be produced or delivered by a size-specific mechanism, probably tied to iron–nickel grain sizes, rather than being representative of the asteroid belt.
  • Sodium depletion at small perihelion distances and the high material strength of Na-free and Na-poor meteoroids indicate that thermal desorption hardens meteoroid material, giving a measurable record of thermal history.
  • Compositional heterogeneity within streams such as Perseids and α-Capricornids implies that single-meteor spectra are weak evidence about a parent body; characterizing a stream requires samples of about ten or more meteors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the proposed size trend predicts a smooth gradient across the mm-cm boundary; re-binning existing faint-meteor and fireball spectral surveys by photometric mass could locate the transition and separate a genuine size effect from instrumental offsets.
  • If the iron fraction truly falls from about 14% at 1-10 mm to 0.5% at cm-dm sizes, a survey at intermediate magnitudes should find the transition size; measuring it would constrain how small iron meteoroids are formed or fragmented.
  • Beyond the paper, the reported spectral similarity between κ-Cygnids and Taurids predicts that high-resolution spectra of κ-Cygnid meteors should match the refractory-element pattern of Taurids, and that a reflectance spectrum of the large remnant 2008 ED69, if obtained, should resemble primitive C- or D-type material.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a spectral and orbital survey of 202 bright meteors (-1 to -14 mag, interpreted as millimeter- to decimeter-sized meteoroids) observed by the AMOS-Spec system between 2013 and 2017, with multi-station trajectory and orbit data for 146 events. The authors measure Na I/Mg I/Fe I intensity ratios, classify the meteors into the spectral classes of Borovička et al. (2005) plus a new Fe-rich class, and combine the classifications with orbital parameters and empirical material-strength indicators K_B and P_E. The central claims are (i) an overall increase in Na/Mg relative to the mm-sized population of Borovička et al. (2005), interpreted as better volatile preservation in larger meteoroids due to weaker space weathering; (ii) a very low fraction of pure iron meteoroids (1/202, 0.5%), implying that cm-dm asteroidal meteoroids are mostly chondritic; and (iii) significant spectral heterogeneity within several meteoroid streams, including Taurids, Perseids, alpha-Capricornids, and delta-Aquarids.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a valuable first large-spectral-sample bridge between the well-studied mm-sized video meteor population and bright fireballs, with implications for space weathering and for the apparent overabundance of iron meteoroids among small asteroidal meteoroids. The paper's strengths include a detailed description of the reduction pipeline, S/N-based line-intensity uncertainties, explicit checks of the instrumental response curve, exclusion of saturated and self-absorbed frames, and the delivery of orbital and atmospheric parameters for a large sample. The authors also candidly state limitations in Section 3, including the absence of a theoretical simulation for the normal-type locus. The main concerns are that the size-trend conclusion relies on an unvalidated extrapolation of the faint-meteor plasma model and on a cross-survey comparison without formal calibration, and that the empirical definition of the normal-type locus introduces a partly circular element into the class fractions.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.2 and Fig. 8] The central claim of an increased Na/Mg ratio in larger meteoroids rests on two unvalidated transfers. The paper states in §2.2 that the thermal-equilibrium plasma model fitted to +3 to -1 mag meteors 'can also be assumed' for -1 to -14 mag events, but no evidence is given that mean plasma temperature, optical depth, and self-absorption behavior are invariant over this range; the low excitation potential of Na I (2.1 eV) versus Mg I (5.1 eV) makes Na/Mg strongly temperature sensitive. The comparison with Borovička et al. (2005) in Fig. 8 is likewise made without a formal cross-calibration of the two instruments and reduction chains; the response-curve check and frame-saturation check are necessary but not sufficient. Please add a quantitative validation, for example a comparison in an overlapping magnitude interval, a model calculation of the expected Na/Mg versus magnitude shift at fixed composition, or a cross-calibration against an independent bright-meteor spectral dataset. Without such a test, the statement that volatile preservation is 'directly observed' overstates the evidence; the size trend is currently a conditional inference.
  2. [§3 and Fig. 6] The normal-type/chondritic locus used for classification is partly empirical and sample-dependent. The paper states that the Borovička et al. (2005) chondritic curve 'might not accurately represent the characteristic chondritic area within our sample' and that 'no theoretical simulation was performed'; the normal-type position was 'simply inferred from the densest part of the distribution.' Because the fractions of Na-poor, Na-free, Na-enhanced, and Na-rich meteors are defined relative to this locus, the reported 11.5% versus 34% Na-depleted comparison is not fully independent of the classification choice. Please demonstrate the robustness of the class fractions and of the size-trend conclusion to plausible alternative normal-type loci defined from an independent model or from a fixed reference.
  3. [§7.2 and Fig. 7] The iron-fraction claim (0.5% versus ~14%) and the Na/Mg offset lack a selection-function and statistical treatment. The sample is magnitude-selected, not size-selected, and iron meteoroids have atypical ablation and luminous behavior; without a discussion of how cm-dm iron bodies would appear in AMOS-Spec, the low iron fraction could partly reflect detectability rather than abundance. In addition, the class fractions are reported without confidence intervals: 1/202 has a 95% Poisson interval of roughly [0.01%, 2.8%], and the offset between the running-average fits in Fig. 8 is not accompanied by a formal test that controls for meteor speed. Please provide confidence intervals for the class fractions, a quantitative speed-controlled comparison of Na/Mg between the two size populations, and a discussion of selection effects for iron bodies at these magnitudes.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and §3] The abstract says the sample contains 202 meteors of -1 to -14 mag, while §3 states the sample is -1 to -11 mag with the lower end possibly reaching -14; please harmonize the stated magnitude range.
  2. [§7.1 and Table 2] The text says the Kasuga et al. (2006) q >= 0.14 au limit 'is satisfied by three Na-free meteors', but only M20150829_015634 (q = 0.207 au) has q >= 0.14 au among the four Na-free meteors in Table 2; please correct or clarify.
  3. [§2.3] The phrase 'not well adapted to exceptionally bright fireballs (< -8 mag)' is ambiguous; it should be phrased as 'brighter than -8 mag' to avoid sign confusion.
  4. [Fig. 5] The histogram x-axis extends only to -12 mag even though the text and abstract mention -14; please indicate how the estimated -14 events are represented or note that only multi-station measured magnitudes are displayed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central Na/Mg size trend and iron fraction are measured ratios and counts compared with an external survey, not quantities forced by fitted parameters or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's main results are empirical comparisons. Na/Mg and Fe/Mg intensity ratios are measured from synthetic-spectrum fits (§2.2, Fig. 4) and the size-dependent Na/Mg increase is read directly from Fig. 8 against the data of Borovička et al. (2005), an independently published external survey; the iron fraction (0.5%) is a count of classified spectra, not a fitted output. Classification follows definitions and the chondritic curve imported from Borovička et al. (2005), and although Section 3 admits that the normal-type locus was 'simply inferred from the densest part of the distribution' rather than modeled, this limits class-label accuracy; it does not generate the raw ratio shift or the iron count, so the central claims do not reduce to those boundary choices. Self-citations (Matlovič et al. 2017; Matlovič et al. 2019, in preparation; Tóth et al. 2015, 2019; Kornoš et al. 2015, 2018) describe instrumentation, reduction software, or previously published Taurid data; none is used as an authority to force the conclusions. The unvalidated transfer of the thermal-equilibrium plasma model to brighter meteors (§2.2) and the lack of cross-calibration with Borovička et al. (2005) are substantive correctness risks, but they are assumptions about transferability, not circular reductions of the results to their inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper reaches its conclusions through observational comparisons. The key premises are that the plasma excitation model transfers from faint to bright meteors, that the AMOS-Spec line ratios are comparable to earlier surveys after sensitivity corrections, and that the empirical K_B and P_E strength parameters capture material properties. These are domain assumptions rather than fitted parameters; none are formalized or machine-checked.

free parameters (1)
  • Spectral class boundaries (normal, Na-enhanced, Na-poor, Fe-rich) = undefined, set by inspection of ternary diagrams
    The boundaries for spectral classes are established relative to the densest region of the observed distribution and to the chondritic curve of Borovička et al. (2005), and the new Fe-rich class is defined by eye. These choices affect the reported percentages of classes, but the main claims on the Na/Mg increase and iron fraction are less sensitive to precise boundaries.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The thermal equilibrium plasma model used for fainter meteors also holds for the brighter, larger meteoroids in this sample.
    Invoked in Section 2.2 where the authors state 'We expect that the same physical conditions fitted by the thermal equilibrium model... can also be assumed for the meteoroid population observed.' This is load-bearing because the Na/Mg/Fe line ratios are interpreted as compositional under this model.
  • domain assumption Line intensity ratios measured by AMOS-Spec are directly comparable to those of Borovička et al. (2005) after sensitivity correction.
    The central size-dependent Na/Mg increase is established by comparing the AMOS-Spec sample to the earlier survey. The authors check the response curve error and atmospheric transmittance, but no cross-instrument calibration is performed. Section 2.2 and Section 3.
  • domain assumption Sodium depletion is primarily caused by space weathering, and Na/Mg ratio is a proxy for volatile content once speed effects are removed.
    Used throughout Sections 7.1 and 7.3 to interpret Na-poor/Na-free and Na-rich spectra; the speed dependence is corrected empirically using fits, and alternative physical explanations are considered but not fully modeled.
  • domain assumption The Tisserand parameter classification (TJ > 3 asteroidal, 2 < TJ < 3 Jupiter-family, TJ < 2 Halley-type) separates source regions for these meteoroids.
    Standard dynamical classification (Kresak 1979), used in Section 4 and Figure 9 to assign asteroidal or cometary origin.
  • domain assumption Meteor beginning and terminal heights, and the empirical K_B and P_E parameters, reliably indicate relative material strength for these meteoroids.
    Used in Section 6 and Figure 20; the K_B/P_E classification is empirical from Ceplecha (1968) and Ceplecha & McCrosky (1976) and may be sensitive to photometry errors, which the authors note for fireballs brighter than -8 mag in Section 2.3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectral and orbital survey of medium-sized meteoroids." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DOUYOTBL

@misc{pith2026190801565,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectral and orbital survey of medium-sized meteoroids},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DOUYOTBL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01565}
}
abstract

We investigate the spectra, material properties, and orbital distribution of millimeter- to decimeter-sized meteoroids. Our study aims to distinguish the characteristics of populations of differently sized meteoroids and reveal the heterogeneity of identified meteoroid streams. We verify the surprisingly large ratio of pure iron meteoroids on asteroidal orbits detected among mm-sized bodies. Emission spectra and multi-station meteor trajectories were collected within the AMOS network observations. The sample is based on 202 meteors of -1 to -14 magnitude, corresponding to meteoroids of mm to dm sizes. Meteoroid composition is studied by relative intensity ratios of Na, Mg, and Fe. Heliocentric orbits, trajectory parameters, and material strengths inferred from empirical $K_B$ and $P_E$ parameters were determined for 146 meteoroids. An overall increase of Na content compared to the population of mm-sized meteoroids was detected, reflecting weaker effects of space weathering processes on larger meteoroids. We report a very low ratio of pure iron meteoroids and the discovery of a new spectral group of Fe-rich meteors. The majority of meteoroids on asteroidal orbits were found to be chondritic. Thermal processes causing Na depletion and physical processes resulting in Na-rich spectra are described and linked to characteristically increased material strengths. Numerous major and minor shower meteors were identified in our sample, revealing various degrees of heterogeneity within Halley-type, ecliptical, and sungrazing meteoroid streams. Our results imply a scattered composition of the fragments of comet 2P/Encke and 109P/Swift-Tuttle. The largest disparities were detected within the $\alpha$-Capricornids and $\delta$-Aquarids. We also find a spectral similarity between $\kappa$-Cygnids and Taurids, which could imply a similar composition of the parent objects of the two streams.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.01565 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Slovak part of the global AMOS network. Observations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Example of the zero-order image of meteor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Fit of the synthetic spectrum (yellow) on measured cal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (18 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Histogram of absolute magnitudes of meteors in our sam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Normal-type spectra form the largest group of our sample [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Ternary diagram displaying the spectral classification of 202 meteors of -1 to -14 mag (corresponding to meteoroids of mm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Observed Na/Mg intensity ratio as a function of meteor speed. The solid line represents a cubic fit to the running average with standard error of the mean for meteors classified as normal. The dashed line represents the fit of normal-type meteors from Borovicka et al. …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Inclination vs. Tisserand parameter plot for measured me [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Observed Fe/Mg intensity ratio (upper) and Na/Mg in￾tensity ratio (lower) as a function of the Tisserand parameter rel￾ative to Jupiter. A cubic fit to the running average of all data points and the standard error of the mean are plotted. The colored areas represent a…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Perihelion vs. aphelion plot in logarithmic scale for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Spectral classification for identified meteors from established meteoroid streams. Separately plotted are meteoroid streams [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_12.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Mean spectral classification (mean Na I/ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Spectral classification for identified meteors from unconfirmed (working list) meteoroid streams. Separately plotted are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Meteor beginning height as a function of entry speed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_16.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Dependence of Na/Mg intensity ratio on meteor begin￾ning height for different spectral types of meteors. The vertical columns represent the range of detected beginning heights for each spectral class positioned at mean Na/Mg value. ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● …
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Dependence of Fe/ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Material strength classification of all meteoroids ob [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Perihelion distance vs. measured Na/Mg intensity ratio for meteoroids of different spectral classes. with the results of Borovicka et al. (2005) suggesting that Na ˇ loss by thermal desorption occurs at q ≤ 0.2 au. According to Kasuga et al. (2006), sodium abundance i…
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Spectra of two δ-Aquarid meteors. The difference be￾tween Na-free (upper) and normal-type (lower) spectra shows the aging effect among meteoroids in a Sun-approaching stream. ence between the Na-free and normal δ-Aquarid spectra is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/f…
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Selected stream meteoroids with detected Na depletion. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_24.png]
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: Monochromatic light curves of Fe-rich meteors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_26.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    L., Lallement, R., Ferron, S., Boonne, C., & Bodichon, R

    Bertaux, J. L., Lallement, R., Ferron, S., Boonne, C., & Bodichon, R. 2014, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 564, A46

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    & Campbell-Brown, M

    Bloxam, K. & Campbell-Brown, M. 2017, Planet. Space Sci., 143, 28 Boroviˇcka, J. 1993, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 279, 627 Boroviˇcka, J. 2001, in ESA Special Publication, V ol. 495, Meteoroids 2001 Con- ference, ed. B. Warmbein, 203–208 Boroviˇcka, J. 2010, in Proceedings of the International Meteor Conference, 26th

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    IMC, Bareges, France, 2007, ed. J. Rendtel & J. Vaubaillon, 42–51 Boroviˇcka, J., Koten, P., Spurný, P., Boˇcek, J., & Štork, R. 2005, Icarus, 174, 15 Boroviˇcka, J., Spurný, P., & Brown, P. 2015, Small Near-Earth Asteroids as a Source of Meteorites, ed. P. Michel, F. E. DeMeo, & W. F. Bottke, 257–280 Boroviˇcka, J., Spurný, P., & Keclikova, J. 1995, Astr...

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    2012, Meteoritics and Planetary Sci- ence, 47, 453

    Brownlee, D., Joswiak, D., & Matrajt, G. 2012, Meteoritics and Planetary Sci- ence, 47, 453

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    2015, Planetary and Space Science, 118, 8

    Campbell-Brown, M. 2015, Planetary and Space Science, 118, 8

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    1968, SAO Special Report, 279

    Ceplecha, Z. 1968, SAO Special Report, 279

    work page 1968

  7. [7]

    1987, Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia, 38, 222

    Ceplecha, Z. 1987, Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia, 38, 222

    1987

  8. [8]

    1988, Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia, 39, 221

    Ceplecha, Z. 1988, Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia, 39, 221

    work page 1988

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    & McCrosky, R

    Ceplecha, Z. & McCrosky, R. E. 1976, Journal of Geophysical Research, 81, 6257

    1976

  2. [10]

    1993, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 279, 615

    Ceplecha, Z., Spurny, P., Borovi ˇcka, J., & Keclikova, J. 1993, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 279, 615

    1993

  3. [11]

    2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 613, A54

    Drouard, A., Vernazza, P., Loehle, S., et al. 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 613, A54

    2018

  4. [12]

    2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 610, A73

    Ferus, M., Koukal, J., Lenža, L., et al. 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 610, A73

    2018

  5. [13]

    Girin, O. G. 2017, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 606, A63

    2017

  6. [14]

    2017, A&A, 598, A52

    Granvik, M., Morbidelli, A., V okrouhlický, D., et al. 2017, A&A, 598, A52

    2017

  7. [15]

    2006, Meteor Showers and their Parent Comets

    Jenniskens, P. 2006, Meteor Showers and their Parent Comets

    2006

  8. [16]

    2014, Meteoroids 2013, 117

    Jenniskens, P., Gural, P., & Berdeu, A. 2014, Meteoroids 2013, 117

    2014

  9. [17]

    H., Numan, D., et al

    Jenniskens, P., Shaddad, M. H., Numan, D., et al. 2009, Nature, 458, 485

    2009

  10. [18]

    & Vaubaillon, J

    Jenniskens, P. & Vaubaillon, J. 2008, AJ, 136, 725

    2008

  11. [19]

    & Vaubaillon, J

    Jenniskens, P. & Vaubaillon, J. 2010, Astronomical Journal, 139, 1822

    2010

  12. [20]

    Jopek, T. J. & Kaˇnuchová, Z. 2017, Planetary and Space Science, 143, 3

    2017

  13. [21]

    2006, Astronomy & As- trophysics, 453, L17

    Kasuga, T., Yamamoto, T., Kimura, H., & Watanabe, J. 2006, Astronomy & As- trophysics, 453, L17

    2006

  14. [22]

    2011, Icarus, 212, 697 Kornoš, L., Matloviˇc, P., Rudawska, R., et al

    Kohout, T., Kiuru, R., Montonen, M., et al. 2011, Icarus, 212, 697 Kornoš, L., Matloviˇc, P., Rudawska, R., et al. 2014, Meteoroids 2013, 225 Kornoš, L., ˇDuriš, F., & Tóth, J. 2015, in International Meteor Conference Mis- telbach, Austria, ed. J.-L. Rault & P. Roggemans, 101–...

    2011

  15. [23]

    2004, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 428, 683

    Koten, P., Boroviˇcka, J., Spurný, P., Betlem, H., & Evans, S. 2004, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 428, 683

    2004

  16. [24]

    Ralchenko, Reader, J., & and NIST ASD Team

    Kramida, A., Yu. Ralchenko, Reader, J., & and NIST ASD Team. 2018, NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 5.6.1), [Online]. Available: https://physics.nist.gov/asd [2019, March 4]. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD

    2018

  17. [25]

    1979, Dynamical interrelations among comets and asteroids, ed

    Kresak, L. 1979, Dynamical interrelations among comets and asteroids, ed. T. Gehrels, 289–309

    1979

  18. [26]

    M., Trigo-Rodríguez, J

    Madiedo, J. M., Trigo-Rodríguez, J. M., Konovalova, N., et al. 2013, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 433, 571

    2013

  19. [27]

    M., Trigo-Rodríguez, J

    Madiedo, J. M., Trigo-Rodríguez, J. M., Ortiz, J. L., Castro-Tirado, A. J., & Cabrera-Caño, J. 2014b, Icarus, 239, 273 Matloviˇc, P., Tóth, J., & Kornoš, L. 2019, Icarus, in preparation Matloviˇc, P., Tóth, J., Rudawska, R., & Kornoš, L. 2017, Planetary and Space Science, 143, 104

    2019

  20. [28]

    Moore, C. E. 1945, Contributions from the Princeton University Observatory, 20, 1

    1945

  21. [29]

    Norton, O. R. 2002, The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Meteorites, 374

    2002

  22. [30]

    Papike, J. J. 1998, Planetary materials, V ol. 36 (Mineralogical Society of Amer- ica)

    1998

  23. [31]

    2016, Planetary and Space Science, 123, 25

    Rudawska, R., Tóth, J., Kalmanˇcok, D., Zigo, P., & Matloviˇc, P. 2016, Planetary and Space Science, 123, 25

    2016

  24. [32]

    2014, Earth Moon and Planets, 112, 45 SonotaCo

    Rudawska, R., Zender, J., Jenniskens, P., et al. 2014, Earth Moon and Planets, 112, 45 SonotaCo. 2009, WGN, Journal of the International Meteor Organization, 37, 55

    2014

  25. [33]

    Southworth, R. B. & Hawkins, G. S. 1963, Smithsonian Contributions to Astro- physics, 7, 261 Spurný, P., Haloda, J., Borovi ˇcka, J., Shrbený, L., & Halodová, P. 2014, A&A, 570, A39 Spurný, P., Oberst, J., & Heinlein, D. 2003, Nature, 423, 151 Tóth, J., Kornoš, L., Zigo, P., e...

    1963

  26. [34]

    M., Llorca, J., Boroviˇcka, J., & Fabregat, J

    Trigo-Rodriguez, J. M., Llorca, J., Boroviˇcka, J., & Fabregat, J. 2003, Meteorit- ics and Planetary Science, 38, 1283

    2003

  27. [35]

    M., Madiedo, J

    Trigo-Rodriguez, J. M., Madiedo, J. M., Williams, I. P., & Castro-Tirado, A. J. 2009, MNRAS, 392, 367

    2009

  28. [36]

    2015, Astronomy & Astro- physics, 584, A97 ˇCapek, D

    Tubiana, C., Snodgrass, C., Michelsen, R., et al. 2015, Astronomy & Astro- physics, 584, A97 ˇCapek, D. & Boroviˇcka, J. 2017, Planetary and Space Science, 143, 159

    2015

  29. [37]

    G., & Campbell-Brown, M

    Vida, D., Brown, P. G., & Campbell-Brown, M. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 4307 V ojáˇcek, V ., Boroviˇcka, J., Koten, P., Spurný, P., & Štork, R. 2015, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 580, A67 V ojáˇcek, V ., Boroviˇcka, J., Koten, P., Spurný, P., & Štork, R. 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 621, A68

    2018

  30. [38]

    Wasson, J. T. & Rubin, A. E. 1985, Nature, 318, 168

    1985

  31. [39]

    2010, Journal of Applied Crystallography, 43, 1126

    Wojdyr, M. 2010, Journal of Applied Crystallography, 43, 1126

    2010

  32. [40]

    2013, in Proceedings of the International Meteor Conference, 31st IMC, La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain, 2012, ed

    Zigo, P., Toth, J., & Kalmancok, D. 2013, in Proceedings of the International Meteor Conference, 31st IMC, La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain, 2012, ed. M. Gyssens & P. Roggemans, 18–20 Article number, page 19 of 19

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.