Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 52 references

An in-plane hexagonal antiferromagnet in the Cu-Mn-As system, Cu$_{0.82}$Mn$_{1.18}$As

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A new hexagonal Cu-Mn-As phase orders its manganese spins in triangles at 270 K, and the ordering does not break the crystal's in-plane symmetry.

desk verdict A real new phase with solid characterization, but the control-compound claim about a/b degeneracy is not yet nailed down. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01758 v2 pith:W5HWLU7G submitted 2019-08-05 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Manohar H. Karigerasi , Kisung Kang , Arun Ramanathan , Danielle L. Gray , Matthias D. Frontzek , Huibo Cao , André Schleife , Daniel P. Shoemaker This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 75.25.-m75.50.Ee
keywords hexagonalCu-Mn-AsphaseantiferromagneticorderingtriangularspinarrangementneutrondiffractionP6structuretypeNéelswitchingcontroldensityfunctionaltheorynon-centrosymmetriccrystal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a previously unknown hexagonal phase, Cu0.82Mn1.18As, in the copper–manganese–arsenic system. The authors show it crystallizes in a new non-centrosymmetric structure type (space group P6) built from the same square-pyramidal MnAs5 units found in tetragonal and orthorhombic CuMnAs. Magnetometry, calorimetry, and neutron diffraction place an antiferromagnetic transition at about 270 K, with manganese spins arranged in a triangular pattern in the ab plane. Because this ordering does not break the symmetry between the a and b directions, the authors argue the compound is a clean control for experiments on current-driven Néel switching in metallic antiferromagnets, where tetragonal CuMnAs is the established switching material.

What carries the argument

The central object is the MnAs5 square-pyramidal coordination unit arranged on a hexagonal P6 lattice, giving three inequivalent Mn sites per cell; the argument runs on comparing the magnetic structure refined from single-crystal neutron diffraction (magnetic space group P6', moments constrained equal across the three Mn sites) against the known 120° triangular patterns in Mn3Sn. The key evidence for the claim that ordering is commensurate is the absence of new magnetic diffraction peaks below TN, so the magnetic propagation vector is taken to be k = 0 and the order is described by an intensity change of allowed nuclear reflections such as (020). The same triangular-in-plane order is also evaluated with density-functional theory, which places the refined configuration close in energy to the DFT minimum and confirms the high-resistivity metallic transport behavior.

What would settle it

Search the single-crystal or powder neutron diffraction pattern below 270 K for magnetic peaks at wavevectors other than allowed nuclear Bragg positions: any superlattice reflection at a general position would falsify the k = 0 assumption and the published triangular spin structure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Hexagonal Cu0.82Mn1.18As is a new phase with a new structure type: space group P6, non-centrosymmetric, with a flat cell (c ≈ 3.8 Å) and three inequivalent MnAs5 square pyramids plus three tetrahedral Cu sites. Single-crystal and powder diffraction refinements give the composition with Mn substituting on Cu sites, and variable-temperature neutron data show the magnetic transition near 270 K is commensurate, k = 0, inferred from the absence of new diffraction peaks. The refined magnetic structure, in magnetic space group P6', has equal moments of 3.02(8) μB/atom on the three Mn sites arranged as 120° triangles in the ab plane; three distinct triangle configurations are possible, and unpolarized neutrons cannot uniquely fix the spin directions. This in-plane triangular order does not break degeneracy along a and b, in contrast to tetragonal CuMnAs, which is the basis for the claim that the hexagonal phase is a useful control for disentangling current-driven Néel switching effects. Transport is weakly temperature dependent and much higher in resistivity than tetragonal CuMnAs, and density-functional calculations show a metallic band structure with low density of states at the Fermi energy, with the neutron-refined magnetic ground state close to the computed energy minimum.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the magnetic order is commensurate with the crystal lattice (k = 0), which is inferred only from the absence of new neutron diffraction peaks; if the true propagation vector were incommensurate, the refined triangular arrangement and the claim that ordering preserves a/b degeneracy would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, the phase adds a hexagonal, non-centrosymmetric member to the Cu–Mn–As family with the same MnAs5 building block as the tetragonal and orthorhombic polymorphs.
  • Because its magnetic order preserves a/b symmetry while keeping spins in-plane, Cu0.82Mn1.18As offers a direct control sample for experiments that attribute current-driven switching in tetragonal CuMnAs to symmetry-breaking staggered order.
  • The refined 120° triangular structure with equal moments on three inequivalent Mn sites becomes a benchmark for first-principles predictions of magnetic ground states in this arsenide family.
  • The weakly temperature-dependent, high resistivity indicates strong disorder scattering and multiple-band transport, so transport signatures alone cannot be used to locate TN.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If a future polarized-neutron or resonant X-ray experiment fixes the in-plane spin directions uniquely, the three triangle variants predicted by the symmetry analysis could be distinguished and the magnetic space group assignment refined.
  • The k = 0 assumption is the load-bearing step: an incommensurate propagation vector would change the published spin arrangement and remove the a/b-degeneracy preservation, so a dedicated search for weak superlattice reflections below TN would settle the structure.
  • The same P6 framework with triangular Mn planes may support other compositions, allowing chemical tuning of TN and of the strength of in-plane anisotropy within this structure type.
  • If the a/b degeneracy preservation is confirmed dynamically, the compound could serve as a testbed for whether spin-orbit torques can still switch antiferromagnetic domains without an anisotropy axis in the plane.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the growth and characterization of a new hexagonal phase, Cu0.82Mn1.18As, in the Cu-Mn-As system. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction, synchrotron powder diffraction, and neutron powder diffraction establish a new P6 structure type built from square-pyramidal MnAs5 units, with appreciable Cu/Mn disorder on Cu sites. Differential scanning calorimetry, aligned magnetometry, and single-crystal neutron diffraction show an antiferromagnetic transition at approximately 270 K with a triangular arrangement of in-plane Mn moments refined in the P6' magnetic space group. Transport measurements show high, weakly temperature-dependent resistivity, and DFT calculations provide a metallic band structure and a comparison of candidate magnetic orderings. The paper proposes this compound as a control for antiferromagnetic spintronics experiments because, unlike tetragonal CuMnAs, its magnetic ordering reportedly preserves the degeneracy of the a and b axes.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a valuable contribution: a previously unreported ternary phase with a new structure type, characterized by multiple independent experimental probes, and a potentially useful comparison compound for current-driven Neel switching studies. The paper is commendably self-contained and does not hide the discrepancy between the DFT lowest-energy ordering and the neutron-refined ordering; the openly reported disagreement is a strength rather than a circularity. The most consequential scientific claim, however, is the proposed a/b-degeneracy-preserving magnetic structure, and that claim is not uniquely determined by the reported data. Because this degeneracy claim is the advertised basis for using the compound as a control, the magnetic structure determination needs strengthening or the claim needs to be correspondingly qualified before the paper can be accepted as is.

major comments (3)
  1. [III.B, Abstract, Conclusions] The claim that the magnetic ordering does not break the degeneracy of the a and b axes is not established by the reported refinement. Section III.B states that "the spin directions in the ab plane could not be uniquely determined by unpolarized neutron diffraction," and the paper does not report a symmetry analysis of all magnetic configurations that fit the single-crystal data equally well. Different 120-degree spin orientations can correspond to different magnetic point groups, some of which distinguish a from b. The refinement in P6' demonstrates one possible model, not uniqueness. Please provide a systematic comparison of the magnetic space groups of all data-compatible configurations, or revise the abstract and conclusions to state that the degeneracy-preserving character is one possible interpretation rather than an established property.
  2. [III.B] The commensurate k = 0 propagation vector is inferred only from the absence of new powder neutron peaks, as stated in "no new peaks, indicating likely k = 0 ordering." This is not a systematic search for incommensurate satellites; an incommensurate ordering with weak or overlapping satellites could be missed in powder data. The refined triangular spin arrangement and the a/b-degeneracy claim both assume commensurate k = 0 ordering. Please report a dedicated search for incommensurate reflections in the single-crystal HB-3A data, or explicitly qualify the magnetic structure and the degeneracy claim as conditional on k = 0.
  3. [III.C, Abstract, Conclusions] The abstract says the neutron-refined magnetic ground state is "close to" the computationally determined minimum-energy configuration, but Section III.C states that DFT arrives at "different lowest-energy orderings" than the neutron refinement, and Fig. 5(b) shows a worse fit for the DFT model (RF2 = 7.98 versus 7.77). Table III gives an energy penalty of about 9.92 meV/atom for fixing the neutron-refined magnetic structure relative to the DFT ground state in stoichiometric CuMnAs. Please clarify in what quantitative sense the neutron-refined state is close to the DFT minimum, and adjust the conclusions so that they do not overstate the level of agreement.
minor comments (5)
  1. [III.B] The text states that "three different types of 120° spin structures" are observed, but these configurations are not defined or shown. Please add a figure or describe the three configurations explicitly.
  2. [III.B] The statement "No improvement in the fit was observed when the moments were allowed to freely vary" would be more informative if accompanied by the refined separate moment values or the corresponding R-factors, so the reader can judge the sensitivity of the fit to the equal-moment constraint.
  3. [III.B] The phrase "full triple-axis data collection" appears inconsistent with the four-circle diffractometer described in Section II; please verify the instrument mode and correct the terminology.
  4. [Methods, III.A] The chemical formula is written with inconsistent spacing as Cu0.82Mn1.18As, Cu 0.82Mn1.18As, and Cu0.82Mn1.18As; please standardize the formula notation throughout the text, tables, and figures.
  5. [Fig. 5(a)] The intensity of the (020) peak is described as an order parameter, but since (020) is an allowed nuclear reflection, the magnetic contribution should be separated from the nuclear baseline or the excess intensity should be plotted, so that the order-parameter behavior below TN is clearer.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the magnetic structure is refined from independent neutron diffraction data, and the DFT comparison is an external, openly discrepant check.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are experimental: single-crystal X-ray diffraction establishes the new P6 structure type, and neutron powder and single-crystal diffraction determine the antiferromagnetic ordering and TN. The magnetic structure is refined directly from measured structure factors, not derived from a fitted parameter that is later called a prediction. The DFT calculations are an independent check with stated approximations (PBE, PAW, non-collinear magnetism plus spin-orbit coupling), and the paper openly reports that the DFT lowest-energy configuration differs from the neutron-refined result, with worse agreement factors (R_F2 = 7.98/23.0 versus 7.77/17.1). No load-bearing step reduces to self-citation; the cited works by overlapping authors are contextual comparisons to other arsenides and do not supply the central result. The admitted underdetermination of in-plane spin directions and the inference of k = 0 ordering from the absence of new diffraction peaks are data limitations, not circularity, so the derivation chain is self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is primarily experimental, introducing no ad hoc free parameters. The structural and magnetic refinements rely on the listed assumptions, which are stated in the text and are standard practice but not independently verified beyond the reported data.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Magnetic ordering is commensurate with k = 0
    Inferred from the absence of new peaks in powder neutron data, then used as the basis for the single-crystal refinement in P6'. An incommensurate ordering would alter the spin structure.
  • domain assumption The three inequivalent Mn sites are constrained to have equal magnetic moments
    The refinement constrained all Mn moments to be equal; no improvement was seen when allowed to vary, but this constraint affects the spin arrangement determined.
  • domain assumption No ordered magnetic moment on the Cu-majority sites
    No local moment was stably refined on the mixed Cu/Mn sites, and Cu is assumed not to carry a moment in arsenides, so the magnetic structure attributes all order to the full Mn sites.
  • domain assumption DFT with PBE-GGA accurately captures the qualitative electronic and magnetic structure
    DFT is used to confirm metallicity and compare magnetic energies, but known limitations in strongly correlated systems mean the magnetic ordering could differ from the true ground state.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An in-plane hexagonal antiferromagnet in the Cu-Mn-As system, Cu$_{0.82}$Mn$_{1.18}$As." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W5HWLU7G

@misc{pith2026190801758,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An in-plane hexagonal antiferromagnet in the Cu-Mn-As system, Cu$_0.82$Mn$_1.18$As},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W5HWLU7G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01758}
}
abstract

We report the single-crystal growth and characterization of a new hexagonal phase, Cu$_{0.82}$Mn$_{1.18}$As, in the Cu-Mn-As system. This compound contains the same square-pyramidal MnAs$_5$ units as the tetragonal and orthorhombic polymorphs of CuMnAs. Calorimetry, magnetometry, and neutron diffraction measurements reveal antiferromagnetic ordering at 270 K. The magnetic structure consists of a triangular arrangement of spins in the $ab$ plane. Hexagonal Cu$_{0.82}$Mn$_{1.18}$As shows resistivity that varies only weakly from 5 K to 300 K, and is many times higher than tetragonal CuMnAs, indicative of a strongly-scattering metal. First-principles calculations confirm the metallic band structure with a small density of states at the Fermi energy. The neutron-refined magnetic ground state is close to the computationally-determined minimum energy configuration. This compound should serve as a clear control when disentangling the effects of current-driven N\'{e}el switching of metallic antiferromagnets since it exhibits in-plane spins but the magnetic ordering does not break degeneracy along the $a$ and $b$ directions, unlike tetragonal CuMnAs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.01758 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (Color online.) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (Color online.) Unit cell of Cu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (Color online.) DSC data (a) show a clear kink in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (Color online.) Measured single-crystal neutron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (Color online.) Structure and magnetic configuration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (Color online.) (a) Resistivity of Cu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (Color online.) Electronic band structure of (a) stoi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Wadley , author B

    author author P. Wadley , author B. Howells , author J. Zelezny , author C. Andrews , author V. Hills , author R. P. \ Campion , author V. Novak , author K. Olejnik , author F. Maccherozzi , author S. S. \ Dhesi , author S. Y. \ Martin , author T. Wagner , author J. Wunderlich , author F. Freimuth , author Y. Mokrousov , author J. Kunes , author J. S. \ C...

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    author author M. J. \ Grzybowski , author P. Wadley , author K. W. \ Edmonds , author R. Beardsley , author V. Hills , author R. P. \ Campion , author B. L. \ Gallagher , author J. S. \ Chauhan , author V. Novak , author T. Jungwirth , author F. Maccherozzi , \ and\ author S. S. \ Dhesi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.057701 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ ...

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.057701

  3. [3]

    Wadley , author S

    author author P. Wadley , author S. Reimers , author M. J. \ Grzybowski , author C. Andrews , author M. Wang , author J. S. \ Chauhan , author B. L. \ Gallagher , author R. P. \ Campion , author K. W. \ Edmonds , author S. S. \ Dhesi , author F. Maccherozzi , author V. Novak , author J. Wunderlich , \ and\ author T. Jungwirth ,\ 10.1038/s41565-018-0079-1 ...

    doi:10.1038/s41565-018-0079-1

  4. [4]

    Electrical N\'eel-order switching in magnetron-sputtered CuMnAs thin films

    author author T. Matalla-Wagner , author M.-F. \ Rath , author D. Graulich , author J.-M. \ Schmalhorst , author G. Reiss , \ and\ author M. Meinert ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.12387 journal journal arxiv \ ( year 2019 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.12387 arXiv:1903.12387 NoStop

    work page Pith review arXiv 1903

  5. [5]

    Wadley , author V

    author author P. Wadley , author V. Hills , author M. R. \ Shahedkhah , author K. W. \ Edmonds , author R. P. \ Campion , author V. Nov \' a k , author B. Ouladdiaf , author D. Khalyavin , author S. Langridge , author V. Saidl , author P. Nemec , author A. W. \ Rushforth , author B. L. \ Gallagher , author S. S. \ Dhesi , author F. MacCherozzi , author J....

    work page doi:10.1038/srep17079

  6. [6]

    Hills , author P

    author author V. Hills , author P. Wadley , author R. P. \ Campion , author V. Novak , author R. Beardsley , author K. W. \ Edmonds , author B. L. \ Gallagher , author B. Ouladdiaf , \ and\ author T. Jungwirth ,\ http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4914119 journal journal J. Appl. Phys. \ volume 117 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4914119

  7. [7]

    Uhlirova , author R

    author author K. Uhlirova , author R. Tarasenko , author F. J. \ Martinez-Casado , author B. Vondrackova , \ and\ author Z. Matej ,\ 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.07.208 journal journal J. Alloy Compd. \ volume 650 ,\ pages 224 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.07.208 2015

  8. [8]

    Uhlirova , author E

    author author K. Uhlirova , author E. Duverger-Nedellec , author R. H. \ Colman , author J. Volny , author B. Vondrackova , \ and\ author K. Carva ,\ 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.08.199 journal journal J. Alloy Compd. \ volume 771 ,\ pages 680 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.08.199 2018

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    author author A. N. \ Nateprov , author V. C. \ Kravtsov , author V. Fritsch , \ and\ author H. von L \" o hneysen ,\ 10.3103/S1068375511060147 journal journal Surf. Eng. Appl. Elect. \ volume 47 ,\ pages 540 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  2. [10]

    M \' a ca , author J

    author author F. M \' a ca , author J. Ma s ek , author O. Stelmakhovych , author X. Mart \' i , author H. Reichlov \' a , author K. Uhl \' i řov \' a , author P. Beran , author P. Wadley , author V. Nov \' a k , \ and\ author T. Jungwirth ,\ 10.1016/j.jmmm.2011.12.017 journal...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Tang , author Q

    author author P. Tang , author Q. Zhou , author G. Xu , \ and\ author S. C. \ Zhang ,\ 10.1038/nphys3839 journal journal Nat. Phys. \ volume 12 ,\ pages 1100 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  4. [12]

    Kim , author K

    author author Y. Kim , author K. Kang , author A. Schleife , \ and\ author M. J. \ Gilbert ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.134415 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 97 ,\ pages 134415 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  5. [13]

    Emmanouilidou , author H

    author author E. Emmanouilidou , author H. Cao , author P. Tang , author X. Gui , author C. Hu , author B. Shen , author J. Wu , author S.-C. \ Zhang , author W. Xie , \ and\ author N. Ni ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.224405 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 96 ,\ pages 224405 ( ...

    doi

  6. [14]

    Pytlik \ and\ author A

    author author L. Pytlik \ and\ author A. Zi e ba ,\ 10.1016/0304-8853(85)90018-6 journal journal J. Magn. Magn. Mater. \ volume 51 ,\ pages 199 ( year 1985 ) NoStop

    1985 doi

  7. [15]

    author author L. H. \ Schwartz , author E. L. \ Hall , \ and\ author G. P. \ Felcher ,\ 10.1063/1.1660367 journal journal J. Appl. Phys. \ volume 42 ,\ pages 1621 ( year 1971 ) NoStop

    1971 doi

  8. [16]

    author author V. P. \ Glazkov , author D. P. \ Kozlenko , author K. M. \ Podurets , author B. N. \ Savenko , \ and\ author V. A. \ Somenkov ,\ 10.1134/1.1541743 journal journal Crystallogr. Rep. \ volume 48 ,\ pages 59 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    doi

  9. [17]

    author author L. H. \ Dietrich , author W. Jeitschko , \ and\ author M. H. \ M\"oller ,\ http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/zkri.1990.190.issue-1-4/zkri.1990.190.14.259/zkri.1990.190.14.259.xml journal journal Z. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater. \ volume 190 ,\ pages 259 ( year 1990 ) NoStop

    1990

  10. [18]

    author author M. H. \ M\"oller \ and\ author W. Jeitschko ,\ http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/zkri.1993.204.issue-1-2/zkri.1993.204.12.77/zkri.1993.204.12.77.xml journal journal Z. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater. \ volume 204 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    1993

  11. [19]

    author author M. F. \ Hagedorn \ and\ author W. Jeitschko ,\ 10.1006/jssc.1994.1369 journal journal J. Solid State Chem. \ volume 113 ,\ pages 257 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    1994

  12. [20]

    author author M. F. \ Hagedorn \ and\ author W. Jeitschko ,\ 10.1016/0022-4596(95)80051-P journal journal J. Solid State Chem. \ volume 119 ,\ pages 344 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    1995 doi

  13. [21]

    Nowotny , author R

    author author H. Nowotny , author R. Funk , \ and\ author J. Pesl ,\ 10.1007/BF00900849 journal journal Monatsh. Chem. \ volume 82 ,\ pages 513 ( year 1951 ) NoStop

    1951 doi

  14. [22]

    Yuzuri \ and\ author M

    author author M. Yuzuri \ and\ author M. Yamada ,\ 10.1143/JPSJ.15.1845 journal journal J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. \ volume 15 ,\ pages 1845 ( year 1960 ) NoStop

    1960 doi

  15. [23]

    author author A. E. \ Austin , author E. Adelson , \ and\ author W. H. \ Cloud ,\ 10.1063/1.1728729 journal journal J. Appl. Phys. \ volume 33 ,\ pages 1356 ( year 1962 ) NoStop

    1962 doi

  16. [24]

    Wang , author B

    author author J. Wang , author B. H. \ Toby , author P. L. \ Lee , author L. Ribaud , author S. M. \ Antao , author C. Kurtz , author M. Ramanathan , author R. B. \ Von Dreele , \ and\ author M. A. \ Beno ,\ 10.1063/1.2969260 journal journal Rev. Sci. Instrum. \ volume 79 ,\ p...

    doi

  17. [25]

    author author M. D. \ Frontzek , author R. Whitfield , author K. M. \ Andrews , author A. B. \ Jones , author M. Bobrek , author K. Vodopivec , author B. C. \ Chakoumakos , \ and\ author J. A. \ Fernandez-Baca ,\ @noop journal journal Rev. Sci. Instrum. \ volume 89 ,\ pages 09...

    2018

  18. [26]

    Perez-Mato , author S

    author author J. Perez-Mato , author S. Gallego , author E. Tasci , author L. Elcoro , author G. de la Flor , \ and\ author M. Aroyo ,\ 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070214-021008 journal journal Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. \ volume 45 ,\ pages 217 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi

  19. [27]

    Rodríguez-Carvajal ,\ 10.1016/0921-4526(93)90108-I journal journal Physica B \ volume 192 ,\ pages 55 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    author author J. Rodríguez-Carvajal ,\ 10.1016/0921-4526(93)90108-I journal journal Physica B \ volume 192 ,\ pages 55 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    1993 doi

  20. [28]

    Kresse \ and\ author J

    author author G. Kresse \ and\ author J. Furthm \"u ller ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 54 ,\ pages 11169 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996 doi

  21. [29]

    Kresse \ and\ author D

    author author G. Kresse \ and\ author D. Joubert ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 59 ,\ pages 1758 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    1999 doi

  22. [30]

    author author P. E. \ Bl\"ochl ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 50 ,\ pages 17953 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    1994 doi

  23. [31]

    author author J. P. \ Perdew , author K. Burke , \ and\ author M. Ernzerhof ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 77 ,\ pages 3865 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996 doi

  24. [32]

    author author H. J. \ Monkhorst \ and\ author J. D. \ Pack ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 13 ,\ pages 5188 ( year 1976 ) NoStop

    1976 doi

  25. [33]

    Steiner , author S

    author author S. Steiner , author S. Khmelevskyi , author M. Marsmann , \ and\ author G. Kresse ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.224425 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 93 ,\ pages 224425 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  26. [34]

    author author V. F. \ Sears ,\ 10.1080/10448639208218770 journal journal Neutron News \ volume 3 ,\ pages 26 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    1992 doi

  27. [35]

    Nozue , author H

    author author T. Nozue , author H. Kobayashi , author M. Sato , author A. Uesawa , author T. Suzuki , \ and\ author T. Kamimura ,\ 10.1016/S0921-4526(97)00088-4 journal journal Physica B \ volume 237-238 ,\ pages 174 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    doi

  28. [36]

    author author Z. M. \ Stadnik , author P. Wang , author N. Jansen , author D. Walcher , author P. Gütlich , \ and\ author T. Kanomata ,\ 10.1088/0953-8984/20/32/325230 journal journal J. Phys. Cond. Mat. \ volume 20 ,\ pages 325230 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    doi

  29. [37]

    author author P. J. \ Brown , author V. Nunez , author F. Tasset , author J. B. \ Forsyth , \ and\ author P. Radhakrishna ,\ @noop journal journal J. Phys.: Condens. Matter \ volume 2 ,\ pages 9409 ( year 1990 ) NoStop

    1990

  30. [38]

    author author B. Y. \ Kotyuzhanskii \ and\ author D. V. \ Nikiforov ,\ @noop journal journal J. Phys.: Condens. matter \ volume 3 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    1991

  31. [39]

    Hirakawa , author H

    author author K. Hirakawa , author H. Ikeda , author H. Kadowaki , \ and\ author K. Ubukoshi ,\ @noop journal journal J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. \ volume 52 ,\ pages 2882 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

    1983

  32. [40]

    author author T. F. \ Duan , author W. J. \ Ren , author W. L. \ Liu , author S. J. \ Li , author W. Liu , \ and\ author Z. D. \ Zhang ,\ @noop journal journal Appl. Phys. Lett. \ volume 107 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  33. [41]

    author author L. J. \ Pauwels , author G. Maervoet , \ and\ author R. Vervaeke ,\ 10.1002/zaac.19733970310 journal journal Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. \ volume 397 ,\ pages 307 ( year 1973 ) NoStop

    1973 doi

  34. [42]

    author author E. V. \ Sampathkumaran , author K. Sengupta , author S. Rayaprol , author K. K. \ Iyer , author T. Doert , \ and\ author J. P. F. \ Jemetio ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.036603 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 91 ,\ pages 036603 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    doi

  35. [43]

    Sengupta , author P

    author author K. Sengupta , author P. L. \ Paulose , author E. V. \ Sampathkumaran , author T. Doert , \ and\ author J. P. F. \ Jemetio ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.184424 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 72 ,\ pages 184424 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    doi

  36. [44]

    Katsuraki \ and\ author N

    author author H. Katsuraki \ and\ author N. Achiwa ,\ 10.1143/JPSJ.21.2238 journal journal J. Phys. Soc. Japan \ volume 21 ,\ pages 2238 ( year 1966 ) NoStop

    1966 doi

  37. [45]

    author author P. W. \ Chapman , author O. N. \ Tufte , author J. D. \ Zook , \ and\ author D. Long ,\ 10.1063/1.1729180 journal journal J. Appl. Phys. \ volume 34 ,\ pages 3291 ( year 1963 ) NoStop

    1963 doi

  38. [46]

    Takeshita , author I

    author author N. Takeshita , author I. Akira , author S. Ishida , author H. Eisaki , \ and\ author Y. Yoshida ,\ @noop journal journal J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. \ volume 950 ,\ pages 042024 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  39. [47]

    Wadley , author V

    author author P. Wadley , author V. Nov \' a k , author R. P. \ Campion , author C. Rinaldi , author X. Mart \' i , author H. Reichlov \' a , author J. Zelezn \' y , author J. Gazquez , author M. A. \ Roldan , author M. Varela , author D. Khalyavin , author S. Langridge , auth...

    2013 arXiv

  40. [48]

    author author L. C. \ Lutz ,\ title Electronic structure, magnetic structure, and metal-atom site preferences in CrMnAs ,\ 10.31274/etd-180810-3269 type Graduate theses and dissertations ,\ school Iowa State University ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi

  41. [49]

    M\' a ca , author J

    author author F. M\' a ca , author J. Kudrnovsk' y , author V. Drchal , author K. Carva , author P. Bal\' a z , \ and\ author I. Turek ,\ https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.094406 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 96 ,\ pages 094406 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi

  42. [50]

    Yang , author K

    author author K. Yang , author K. Kang , author Z. Diao , author A. Ramanathan , author M. H. \ Karigerasi , author D. P. \ Shoemaker , author A. Schleife , \ and\ author D. G. \ Cahill ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.07810 journal journal arXiv \ ,\ pages 1 ( year 2019 ) ,\ http...

    1903 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Elk , author J

    author author K. Elk , author J. Richter , \ and\ author V. Christoph ,\ 10.1088/0305-4608/9/2/019 journal journal J. Phys. F \ volume 9 ,\ pages 307 ( year 1979 ) NoStop

    1979 doi

  44. [52]

    author author J. H. \ Mooij ,\ 10.1002/pssa.2210170217 journal journal Phys. Status Solidi A \ volume 17 ,\ pages 521 ( year 1973 ) NoStop

    1973 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.