Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 33 references

Geometry-assisted topological transitions in spin interferometry

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Square-shaped Rashba loops switch spin interference patterns under weak in-plane magnetic fields, at about 1.5 T, whereas rings need about 6.7 T.

desk verdict Square Rashba loops show a weak-field WAL-to-WL crossover with a plausible but not airtight topological story; deserves peer review with a request for more gate-voltage data. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01825 v2 pith:IQFVSGEX submitted 2019-08-05 cond-mat.mes-hall

M. Wang , H. Saarikoski , A. A. Reynoso , J. P. Baltanás , D. Frustaglia , J. Nitta This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords Rashbaspin-orbitcouplingspininterferometryweakantilocalizationlocalizationtopologicaltransitionwindingnumberAltshuler-Aronov-Spivakoscillationsmesoscopicsquareloop
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the shape of a spin-orbit interferometer controls how easily its spin interference pattern changes topology under a magnetic field. In a square loop, the corners make the spin dynamics strongly non-adiabatic, so a weak in-plane Zeeman field of about $B_Z\approx1.5$ T reverses the sign of the flux-periodic conductance oscillations, switching from weak antilocalization to weak localization. In a ring, the same transition would require about $B_Z\approx6.7$ T and a topological change of the Rashba/Zeeman field texture itself. The reversal is interpreted as a change in the winding number of the spin texture around the Bloch sphere while the field texture keeps its topology. Transport measurements on an array of 700-nm InGaAs square loops, backed by 1D semiclassical and 2D numerical simulations, support the claim.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the pair of integer winding numbers $\omega_s$ and $\omega_B$, computed from the normalized planar projections of the spin texture and the effective field around the loop, together with the time-reversal-path spin evolution operators built from segment-by-segment spin rotations. These winding numbers classify the topology of spin modes on the Bloch sphere; weak antilocalization appears only when $\omega_s=\omega_B$ and the accumulated spin phases are large. In squares, the corners create field discontinuities that make spin evolution non-adiabatic, so a weak Zeeman field changes $\omega_s$ without changing $\omega_B$, producing the checkerboard conductance pattern and the observed weak-antilocalization to weak-localization transition. A fully quantum 2D tight-binding simulation of a disordered square loop reproduces the experimental reversal at about 1.25 T.

What would settle it

Measure the AAS sign reversal line in the plane of gate voltage (Rashba strength $k_{SO}P$) and in-plane field ($k_Z P$): the winding-number mechanism predicts the reversal follows the checkerboard boundaries of the 1D model, with periodicity in both parameters, whereas an orbital or dephasing explanation would give a monotonic amplitude suppression with no periodic dependence on $k_{SO}P$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that geometry-assisted topological transitions in spin textures are experimentally accessible at weak in-plane fields. In Rashba square loops, the discontinuities of the effective spin-guiding field at the corners prevent adiabatic spin tracking, so a small Zeeman field flips the spin winding number $\omega_s$ while the field winding number $\omega_B$ remains unchanged. The conductance then follows a checkerboard pattern in the Rashba and Zeeman strengths: weak antilocalization occurs where $\omega_s=\omega_B$, and weak localization is restored where the spin and field textures decorrelate. The measured sign reversal of the AAS conductance oscillations in a 40$\times$40 array of 700-nm squares at $B_Z\approx1.5$ T is identified with this transition, much weaker than the $B_Z\approx6.7$ T expected for a ring with the same parameters.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the sign reversal of the AAS oscillations at about 1.5 T is produced by a change in the spin texture's winding number, rather than by field-dependent orbital effects or dephasing; the experiment directly measures only the conductance reversal, while the winding-number correlation is established inside the model.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The transition field in a square loop is set by the spin-precession scale $k_Z P \sim k_{SO}P/\sqrt{2}$ (for a diagonal field), so it can be reduced by lowering the Rashba strength or by designing sharper corner scattering.
  • Arrays of polygonal spin-interference loops can act as gate-tunable spin-interference switches: the gate voltage sets the Rashba strength, and a field of about 1.5 T toggles the sign of the interference pattern.
  • The critical field depends on the mean free path, so controlled disorder can be used to engineer the transition rather than only to suppress spin interference.
  • Ring-shaped interferometers should not show the reversal at weak fields; the measured contrast between the square and ring arrays is a direct check of the geometry-assisted mechanism.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the winding-number mechanism is correct, the transition field should depend on the direction of the in-plane field relative to the square: the $1/\sqrt{2}$ factor in the checkerboard formula comes from applying the field along a diagonal, so a side-aligned field would shift the boundaries in a testable way.
  • The checkerboard periodicity suggests a band-like structure for spin-texture topology in the Rashba–Zeeman parameter plane; assigning a Chern number to these zones (flagged in the paper as future work) could connect the single-loop transition to quantized response in periodic arrays.
  • The same geometry assistance should appear in other spin-orbit materials whenever the spin precession length is comparable to the segment length; since the transition scales with $k_{SO}P$, stronger Rashba coupling would move the transition to proportionally larger Zeeman fields.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports theory, simulations, and experiments on spin transport through Rashba square-shaped and ring-shaped interferometers in the presence of an in-plane Zeeman field. A 1D semiclassical TR-path model yields a checkerboard-like conductance pattern for squares (in contrast to the striped pattern for rings), with WAL/WL zones correlated with the spin-texture winding number. 2D tight-binding Kwant simulations reproduce an AAS oscillation sign reversal around B_Z ≈ 1.25 T, and an experiment on a 40×40 array of square loops (side 700 nm) shows a reversal of the AAS oscillations between about 1 T and 1.5 T. The authors interpret this reversal as a topological transition of the spin texture that occurs at weaker fields in squares than in rings, assisted by the square corners acting as spin-scattering centers.

Significance. If the topological interpretation is upheld, the work would demonstrate that geometric shaping of Rashba interferometers can lower the field scale for spin-texture topological transitions by a factor of about four compared with rings, and would connect experimentally observed AAS sign reversals to spin-winding-number changes. Strengths include the analytic 1D result in Eq. (S14), the fact that 2D disorder simulations with parameters close to the experiment reproduce the reversal field, and the explicit experimental observation of an AAS sign change in square loops. These elements make the core phenomenon—field-induced reversal of spin interference in square loops—credible. However, the topological interpretation is currently inferred from the same spin evolution operators that generate the conductance, and the experiment measures only the conductance reversal, so the topological claim needs additional support.

major comments (4)
  1. [Semiclassical theory, Eqs. (S9)–(S11) and Fig. 1] The correlation between the WAL/WL zones in Fig. 1(b) and the spin winding number |ω_s| in Fig. 1(d) is internal to the same calculation: both quantities are obtained from the spin evolution operators U_± defined by Eqs. (S9)–(S11). Thus this correlation is a consistency check of the model, not an independent derivation of the topological origin of the conductance pattern. This is load-bearing because the paper's central interpretation rests on that correlation. A concrete test would be to modify the model so that the spin phase accumulation is decoupled from the texture winding (for example, by adding a random spin-phase contribution while preserving ω_s) and to show that the WAL/WL pattern follows the phase magnitude rather than the winding, or conversely to derive the conductance sign directly from a winding-number invariant without invoking the same evolution operators.
  2. [Experiment and discussion, Fig. 4(a)] The AAS sign reversal observed around B_Z ≈ 1.5 T is interpreted as a WAL-to-WL transition caused by a spin-texture topological change, but the experimental data alone are also consistent with two competing field-dependent amplitudes crossing zero: the text notes that the interference amplitudes weaken due to spin-induced dephasing before the reversal, and a vanishing amplitude near B_Z ≈ 1 T followed by reappearance with opposite sign is exactly a zero-crossing of an amplitude. To discriminate, the manuscript should provide a falsifiable prediction that distinguishes a topological transition from a nontopological amplitude crossover. A natural test is the gate-voltage dependence of the reversal field: the topological scenario predicts a specific scaling with the Rashba strength (through k_SO P and k_Z P), whereas a dephasing-based crossover would show a different, monotonic dependence. This test is not reported.
  3. [Experiment and discussion, Fig. 4(b)] The ring comparison in Fig. 4(b) is not a controlled experiment. The ring array has a different radius (600 nm vs. 700 nm side), is measured at a different gate voltage (V_g = -4.6 V vs. -3.6 V), and is the same sample as in Ref. [4], not a companion sample fabricated under identical conditions. Moreover, the predicted ring transition at B_Z ≈ 6.7 T was not experimentally reached, since measurements only extend to 2.5 T. Therefore the statement that the square transition at about 1.5 T is 'much weaker than the expected in the ring-shaped interferometer' compares an experimental field to a theoretical estimate for the ring, not to a measured ring transition. The authors should either measure a ring array under comparable conditions up to higher in-plane fields, or present 2D simulations with the same disorder, dimensions, and gate parameters showing that a ring does not reverse up to the field range studied.
  4. [Experiment and discussion, paragraph on AAS amplitude] The claim that the AAS amplitude at B_perp = 0 'reflects exclusively the phase contribution from the spin part of the wave function' is only established within the 1D semiclassical model (Eqs. (S16)–(S17)). In the experiment, B_Z is applied in-plane but the finite thickness and possible misalignment of the field, as well as field-dependent changes in the carrier density or the disorder configuration, can introduce orbital or visibility effects that affect the zero-flux amplitude. The manuscript does not present control measurements or estimates of these contributions. At minimum, the authors should quantify the expected orbital magnetoresistance induced by B_Z and show that it is negligible on the field scale of the observed reversal.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption contains an apparent typo: it states the winding number |ω_s| is shown for 'ring (c) and square (b) loops', but the square winding number is in panel (d), not (b). The sentence should read 'ring (c) and square (d)'.
  2. [Fig. S5 and main text] The main text refers to Figs. S4 and S5 but the sentence 'A full period is not covered...' appears both in the main text (Section Experiment and discussion) and in the Supplementary Material; please unify the presentation and ensure the figure labels in the supplementary text match the actual panels.
  3. [Units in main text] The Rashba parameter is quoted as 'peVm' throughout; please use a consistent typesetting such as 'peV·m' or 'peV m' to avoid ambiguity with the abbreviation for meter times volt.
  4. [Supplementary Material, Eq. (S14)] Equation (S14) is very long and would benefit from a brief derivation sketch in the main text or a reference to the exact steps, since it is one of the key analytic results supporting the checkerboard pattern.
  5. [Conclusions] The final paragraph suggests characterizing the transitions with Chern numbers as 'work in progress'; this is fine as a forward-looking remark, but it should be clarified that the present manuscript does not compute a Chern number, to avoid implying it is already established.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Partial circularity: the 'much weaker than expected' ring comparison is imported from the authors' own prior theory via self-citation, but the square-loop transition itself is supported by experiment and parameter-based 2D simulation.

  1. self citation load bearing [Main text, 'Experiment and discussion' (last paragraph, around Fig. 4)]
    "In a previous work, we demonstrated [17] that the topological transition in a ring happens when the in-plane Zeeman field equals the Rashba SO field (namely, a topological transition in the spin texture requires a topological transition in field texture), which is given by B_SO = 2αk_F/gμ_B. The corresponding in-plane Zeeman field is estimated to be B_Z=6.7 T with α=-2.5 peVm, N_s=1.6 x 10^12 cm^-2, and g=4."

    The quantitative 'expected' ring transition at 6.7 T is not measured in this paper; it is imported from the authors' own prior theoretical work [17] (same group and same model framework). The experimental ring comparison in Fig. 4(b) only shows no AAS reversal up to 2.5 T, so the claim that the square transition is 'much weaker than the expected' ring transition is carried by a self-citation rather than by an independent benchmark. This makes the geometry-assisted contrast partly a comparison to the authors' own earlier calculation.

full rationale

The derivation of the square-loop WAL-to-WL transition is not circular in the strict sense: the conductance and the spin winding numbers are both computed from the same spin-evolution operators (Eqs. S9-S11), but neither quantity is defined in terms of the other. The statement that WAL occurs when the spin and field textures share the same winding is a correlation exposed by the model, not an input assumption, and the experiment independently measures the AAS sign reversal. The main circularity concern is the load-bearing use of the authors' own prior result [17] to set the 'expected' ring transition at 6.7 T; without that self-citation, the ring comparison reduces to a single uncontrolled sample that did not reverse up to 2.5 T. Because the square transition is still supported by direct transport data and a separately implemented 2D simulation with measured material parameters, the paper retains independent content and the circularity is partial rather than total.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum-transport modeling augmented by domain-specific assumptions about time-reversed path dominance, the spin-only origin of the AAS sign reversal, and the material parameters of the InGaAs quantum well. The main adjustable element is the disorder mean free path in the 2D simulations, which controls the predicted critical field. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Mean free path in 2D simulations = 1.2 μm
    Controls the critical B_Z for the AAS sign reversal (Fig. S6b); the paper does not cite an independent measurement, so the value may be tuned to reproduce the experimental transition near 1.25 to 1.5 T.
  • Rashba strength in 2D simulations = α = -2.0 peVm
    Chosen to represent the experimental InGaAs quantum well; the simulated AAS reversal around 1.25 T depends on this input, and the paper notes the critical field also depends on mean free path.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Landauer-Büttiker identification of conductance with transmission and the semiclassical path sum over classical trajectories.
    Used throughout the theory section as the standard mesoscopic transport formalism.
  • domain assumption Ensemble averaging leaves only equal-length time-reversed path pairs, and single-winding paths suffice for loop conductance.
    Basis for Eqs. (S5)-(S7) and the analytic conductances (S12)-(S14); could fail in strongly disordered or multi-winding regimes.
  • domain assumption Spin dynamics does not alter orbital motion; the spin energy is much smaller than kinetic energy.
    Invoked in the semiclassical approximation (Supplementary Ref. [S2]) so that spin and orbital phases factor.
  • ad hoc to paper The winding number omega_s around the z-axis is well defined for square loops, with corner discontinuities smoothed by rounded corners or piecewise integration.
    Footnote [24] introduces a regularization to handle corner discontinuities in the field and spin textures.
  • domain assumption The AAS oscillation sign encodes WAL/WL purely through the spin phase, with no competing orbital mechanism at B_Z up to 2.5 T.
    Needed to read the topological transition out of Fig. 4(a); the paper does not separately characterize orbital magnetoresistance.
  • domain assumption The InGaAs quantum well g-factor is 4.
    Used to convert B_Z to k_Z and to estimate the ring critical field at 6.7 T; not independently measured in this study.
  • domain assumption Disorder in the 2D model, represented by a mean free path of 1.2 μm, faithfully represents the experimental sample.
    The critical B_Z depends on mean free path (Fig. S6b), and no independent measurement of this value is cited.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Geometry-assisted topological transitions in spin interferometry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IQFVSGEX

@misc{pith2026190801825,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Geometry-assisted topological transitions in spin interferometry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IQFVSGEX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01825}
}
read the original abstract

We identify a series of topological transitions occurring in electronic spin transport when manipulating spin-guiding fields controlled by the geometric shape of mesoscopic interferometers. They manifest as distinct inversions of the interference pattern in quantum conductance experiments. We establish that Rashba square loops develop weak-(anti)localization transitions (absent in other geometries as Rashba ring loops) as an in-plane Zeeman field is applied. These transitions, boosted by non-adiabatic spin scattering, prove to have a topological interpretation in terms of winding numbers characterizing the structure of spin modes in the Bloch sphere.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [4]

    Nagasawa, D

    F. Nagasawa, D. Frustaglia, H. Saarikoski, K. Richter, and J. Nitta, Control of the spin geometric phase in semiconductor quantum rings, Nature Comm. 4, 2526 (2013). 9

    work page 2013

  2. [1]

    Manchon, H

    A. Manchon, H. C. Koo, J. Nitta, S. M. Frolov and R. A. Duine, New perspectives for Rashba spin–orbit coupling Nature Mater., 14, 871-882 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [2]

    Aharonov and A

    Y . Aharonov and A. Casher, Topological quantum effects for neutral particles Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 319-321 (1984)

    work page 1984

  4. [3]

    Aharonov and D

    Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory , Phys. Rev. 115, 485-491 (1959)

    work page 1959

  5. [5]

    Lyanda-Geller, Topological Transitions in Berry’ s phase interference effects, Phys

    Y . Lyanda-Geller, Topological Transitions in Berry’ s phase interference effects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 657-661 (1993)

    work page 1993

  6. [6]

    M. Popp, D. Frustaglia, and K. Richter, Conditions for adiabatic spin transport in disordered systems, Phys. Rev. B68, 041303(R) (2003)

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 392, 45–57 (1984)

    work page 1984

  8. [8]

    Ghahari, et al

    F. Ghahari, et al. , An on/off Berry switch in circular graphene resonators, Science 356, 845 (2017)

    work page 2017

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    D. Loss, P. Goldbart, and A. V. Balatsky, Berry’s phase and persistent charge and spin currents in textured mesoscopic rings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1655–1658 (1990)

    1990

  2. [10]

    A. G. Aronov and Y . Lyanda-Geller, Spin-orbit Berry phase in conducting rings , Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 343 (1993)

    1993

  3. [11]

    Stern, Berry phase, motive forces, and mesoscopic conductivity , Phys

    A. Stern, Berry phase, motive forces, and mesoscopic conductivity , Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1022 (1992)

    1992

  4. [12]

    Qian and Z

    T.-Z. Qian and Z. -B. Su, Spin-orbit interaction and Aharonov -Anandan phase in mesoscopic rings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2311 (1994)

    1994

  5. [13]

    A. F. Morpurgo, J. P. Heida, T. M. Klapwijk, B. J. van Wees, and G. Borghs, Ensemble-average spectrum of Aharonov -Bohm conductance oscillations: Evidence for spin -orbit induced Berry’ s phase, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1050 (1998)

    1998

  6. [14]

    J.-B. Yau, E. P. De Poortere, and M. Shayegan, Aharonov-Bohm oscillations with spin: Evidence for Berry’ s phase, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 146801 (2002)

    2002

  7. [15]

    F. E. Meijer, A. F. Morpurgo, and T. M. Klapwijk, Onedimensional ring in the presence of Rashba spin -orbit interaction: Derivation of the correct Hamiltonian , Phys. Rev. B 66, 033107 (2002)

    2002

  8. [16]

    Hentschel, H

    M. Hentschel, H. Schomerus, D. Frustaglia, and K. Richter, Aharonov-Bohm physics with spin. Geometric phases in one-dimensional ballistic rings, Phys. Rev. B 69, 155326 (2004)

    2004

  9. [17]

    Saarikoski, J

    H. Saarikoski, J. E. Vázquez-Lozano, J. P. Baltanás, F. Nagasawa, J. Nitta, and D. Frustaglia, Topological transitions in spin interferometers, Phys. Rev. B 91, 241406(R) (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    F. E. Meijer, A. F. Morpurgo, T. M. Klapwijk, and J. Nitta, Universal spin -induced time reversal symmetry breaking in two -dimensional electron gases with Rashba spin -orbit interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 186805 (2005)

    2005

  11. [19]

    Gentile, C

    Zu-Jian Ying, P. Gentile, C. Ortix, and M. Cuoco, Designing electron spin textures and spin interferometers by shape deformations, Phys. Rev. B 94, 081406(R) (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Z.-J. Ying, P. Gentile, J.P. Baltanás, D. Frustaglia, C. Ortix, and M. Cuoco, Geometric driving of two-level quantum systems, arXiv:1909.04291. 10

    1909 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Bercioux, D

    D. Bercioux, D. Frustaglia, and M. Governale, Signatures of spin -related phases in transport through regular polygons, Phys. Rev. B 72, 113310 (2005)

    2005

  14. [22]

    M. J. van Veenhuizen, T. Koga, and J. Nitta, Spin-orbit induced interference of ballistic electrons in polygon structures, Phys. Rev. B 73, 235315 (2006)

    2006

  15. [23]

    The value of N necessary for the good description of a Ra shba ring must be determined by setting the side length L much smaller than the spin precession length 𝐿𝑆𝑂 = 𝜋/𝑘𝑆𝑂

  16. [24]

    Otherwise, notice that 𝜔𝑠 can always be calculated by piecewise integration along the square’s sides

    Formal problems in the definition of 𝜔𝑠/𝐵 for squares are eliminated by introducing rounded corners with radius 𝑟 ≪ 𝐿 that remove any discontinuity in the field texture and in the spin texture’s derivative without other significant consequences. Otherwise, notice that 𝜔𝑠 can a...

  17. [25]

    Frustaglia and K

    D. Frustaglia and K. Richter, Spin interference effects in ring conductors subject to Rashba coupling, Phys. Rev. B 69, 235310 (2004)

    2004

  18. [26]

    Reynoso, J.P

    A.A. Reynoso, J.P. Baltanás, H. Saarikoski, J.E. Vázquez -Lozano, J. Nitta, and D. Frustaglia, Spin resonance under topological driving fields, New J. Phys. 19, 063010 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Nitta, T

    J. Nitta, T. Akazaki, H. Takayanagi and T. Enoki, Gate control of spin -orbit interaction in an inverted InGaAs/InAlAs heterostructure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1335 (1997)

    1997

  20. [28]

    Engels, J

    G. Engels, J. Lange, Th. Schäpers, and H. Lü th, Experimental and theoretical approach to spin splitting in modulation -doped InGaAs/InP quantum wells for B →0, Phys. Rev. B 55, R1958 (R) (1997)

    1997

  21. [29]

    B. L. Al’tshuler, A. G. Aronov, and B. Z. Spivak, The Aharonov-Bohm effect in disordered conductors, JETP Lett. 33, 94-97 (1981)

    1981

  22. [30]

    Bergsten, T

    T. Bergsten, T. Kobayashi, Y. Sekine, and J. Nitta: Experimental demonstration of the time reversal Aharonov–Casher effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 196803 (2006)

    2006

  23. [31]

    Nagasawa, J

    F. Nagasawa, J. Takagi, Y. Kunihashi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, Experimental Demonstration of Spin Geometric Phase: Radius Dependence of Time -Reversal Aharonov-Casher Oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 086801 (2012)

    2012

  24. [32]

    C. W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhm erov, and X. Waintal, Kwant: a software package for quantum transport, New J. Phys 16, 063065 (2014)

    2014

  25. [33]

    freezing

    D. Frustaglia, J.P. Baltanás, A.A. Reynoso, H. Saarikoski, and J. Nitta, work in progress (2019). 11 Fig. 1. Linear conductance of ring (a) and square (b) loops by TR -path interference ( red: WL; blue: WAL) and winding number of spin textures, |𝜔𝑠|, in ring (c) and square (b)...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.