Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 62 references

Extended symmetry analysis of two-dimensional degenerate Burgers equation

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The two-dimensional degenerate Burgers equation has no generalized symmetries beyond its Lie symmetries.

desk verdict The generalized-symmetry theorem rests on a false lemma; the rest of the paper is largely solid, but Theorem 5 needs a corrected proof. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01877 v2 pith:DEV6IGUK submitted 2019-08-05 math.AP math-phmath.MP

Olena O. Vaneeva , Roman O. Popovych , Christodoulos Sophocleous This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath-phmath.MP MSC 35A3035K65
keywords degenerateBurgersequationgeneralizedsymmetriesLieconservationlawscosymmetriesbackwardheatreductionshidden
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's core claim is that the two-dimensional degenerate Burgers equation $u_t+uu_x-u_{yy}=0$, a nonlinear equation used in finance and lattice-gas models, has no genuinely generalized symmetries: every generalized symmetry is equivalent to a Lie symmetry. This matters because it closes a classification question and shows that, unlike the classical Burgers equation, this equation has no higher-order local symmetry structure to exploit. The paper also establishes an infinite-dimensional space of local conservation laws, canonically parameterized by solutions of the (1+1)-dimensional backward heat equation $\gamma_t+\gamma_{yy}=0$, with explicit conserved currents. Along the way it computes the complete point-symmetry group, classifies Lie reductions optimally, constructs new exact solutions related to the heat equation, and describes hidden symmetries and hidden conservation laws. A by-product is a complete local-symmetry and conservation-law description of the transport equation.

What carries the argument

The argument runs on two main mechanisms. For symmetries, reduced generalized symmetries are written in evolutionary form with characteristic $\eta$, which must satisfy the determining equation (6); the proof differentiates this equation to obtain the system (8), uses a polynomiality theorem from the standard theory to conclude that $\eta$ is polynomial in the jet variables $u_{kl}$, then applies a monomial-splitting lemma (Lemma 6) that forces all monomial coefficients beyond those of Lie-symmetry characteristics to vanish. For conservation laws, cosymmetries are shown by an order argument to have order $-\infty$, so they reduce to functions $\gamma(t,y)$ satisfying $\gamma_t+\gamma_{yy}=0$; the adjoint equation $v_t+uv_x+v_{yy}=0$ and the variational principle tie these to canonical conserved currents. The heat equation is therefore the hidden linear object governing both the exact solutions and the conservation laws.

What would settle it

Compute a single generalized-symmetry characteristic $\eta$ satisfying (6) that is not equivalent to a Lie-symmetry characteristic—for example, a non-polynomial or higher-order $\eta$—and Theorem 5 falls; a direct symbolic substitution of such an ansatz into (6) is a concrete test. Similarly, a conservation-law characteristic not of the form $\gamma(t,y)$ with $\gamma_t+\gamma_{yy}=0$ (for instance, one depending on $x$ or on derivatives of $u$) would refute Proposition 8.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is a pair of rigidity results. Theorem 5 states that the quotient algebra of generalized symmetries of (1) by trivial generalized symmetries is naturally isomorphic to its maximal Lie invariance algebra $\mathfrak{g}=\langle D_t,D_x,P_t,G_x,P_y,P_x\rangle$, so each generalized-symmetry class contains exactly one Lie symmetry. Proposition 8 states that the quotient spaces of cosymmetries and of conservation-law characteristics are naturally isomorphic to the solution space of the backward heat equation $\gamma_t+\gamma_{yy}=0$, and every conservation law is represented by a conserved current $(\gamma u, \frac12\gamma u^2, \gamma_y u-\gamma u_y)$. The paper also determines the complete point-symmetry group and classifies Lie reductions, yielding new exact solutions including families parameterized by arbitrary solutions of the linear heat equation.

Load-bearing premise

The entire proof that no generalized symmetries exist beyond Lie symmetries rests on the imported theorem that each generalized-symmetry characteristic can be treated as a polynomial in the derivatives of the unknown function; if that theorem does not apply to this equation, the monomial-splitting argument cannot begin and Theorem 5 loses its support.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The complete point-symmetry group of (1) consists of translations in $t,x,y$, scalings, one Galilean boost, and the two sign-flip involutions; every point symmetry is a composition of these.
  • All generalized symmetries of (1) are equivalent to Lie symmetries, so the symmetry quotient is the six-dimensional algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ and no higher-order local symmetry exists.
  • The space of local conservation laws is infinite-dimensional and canonically parameterized by solutions of $\gamma_t+\gamma_{yy}=0$ via conserved currents $(\gamma u,\frac12\gamma u^2,\gamma_y u-\gamma u_y)$.
  • The Lie reductions of codimension one and two are classified up to equivalence, yielding invariant solutions expressed through arbitrary solutions of the (1+1)-dimensional linear heat equation and through standard special functions.
  • The transport equation's generalized symmetries, cosymmetries, and conservation laws are described completely, and hidden symmetries and hidden conservation laws of (1) associated with reductions to the heat, Burgers, and transport equations are identified.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the collapse of generalized symmetries rules out nontrivial recursion-operator or master-symmetry hierarchies for (1); a natural next target is the variable-coefficient analogue $u_t+uu_x+A(t)u_{xx}+B(t)u_{yy}=0$, where coefficient freedom may restore higher-order symmetries.
  • Because all conservation laws are encoded by solutions of a linear backward heat equation, they inherit the heat equation's superposition principle; one could in principle generate new conserved currents by adding or scaling heat solutions.
  • The proof of Theorem 5 depends on the polynomiality import; a direct computer search for non-polynomial or high-order characteristics satisfying (6) would be a cheap check of that load-bearing step.
  • The common-solution construction in Section 7 suggests a broader question: classify all solutions of (1) that also satisfy the nondegenerate Burgers equation; the paper's ansatz $u=w_1(t,y)x+w_0(t,y)$ reduces this to the system (15)-(16), which may admit a complete explicit integration.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper carries out the extended symmetry analysis of the (1+2)-dimensional degenerate Burgers equation u_t + u u_x - u_yy = 0. The main results are: the complete point-symmetry group is computed via the algebraic method; one- and two-dimensional subalgebras are classified and used for Lie reductions, producing new exact solutions; Theorem 5 claims that every generalized symmetry is equivalent to a Lie symmetry; Proposition 8 claims that cosymmetries and conservation-law characteristics are naturally parameterized by solutions of the backward heat equation gamma_t + gamma_yy = 0, with conserved currents (gamma u, 1/2 gamma u^2, gamma_y u - gamma u_y). The paper also studies common solutions with the nondegenerate Burgers equation and gives new solutions of related nonlinear diffusion and diffusion-convection equations.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper makes a substantial contribution to the symmetry analysis of a physically relevant equation: it settles the point-symmetry group, proves the absence of genuinely generalized symmetries, and gives an infinite-dimensional conservation-law space parameterized by the backward heat equation. The algebraic method for the point-symmetry group and the explicit computations (with computer-algebra checks by DESOLV and Jets) are strengths, and the solution families are useful. However, the proof of Theorem 5 rests on a lemma that is false as stated. Since Theorem 5 is one of the two central structural claims, the manuscript cannot be accepted in its current form; the proof of that theorem must be corrected or replaced.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 5, Lemma 6 and Eq. (9)] Lemma 6 is false as stated. The function theta = u_10^2 (i.e., u_x^2) satisfies Eq. (9) with V identically zero: theta_{u_10} = 2u_10, the only nonzero second derivative is theta_{u_10 u_10} = 2, and the sum in Eq. (9) reduces to 2 * binom(1,1) * binom(0,0) * u_{1-1+1,0} = 2u_10, so V = 0. For p = 2, however, the monomial u_10^2 is not of the form u_01 u_00 or u_10 u_00, contradicting the lemma's conclusion. Moreover, the proof's statement that all monomials in V have degree p+1 is incorrect: for homogeneous theta of degree p, both summands in V have degree p-1. Consequently, the asserted leading monomial u_iota* u_10 cannot arise, and the coefficient-splitting argument collapses. Since Lemma 6 is used to split Eq. (7) and to reduce eta to the form displayed after Eq. (9), the proof of Theorem 5 does not establish the theorem as written.
  2. [Section 5, polynomiality step after Eq. (8)] The step claiming that eta is polynomial in the jet variables u_kl is highly compressed: it invokes Theorem 5.104 and formula (5.151) of Olver [41] for Eq. (8), but the hypotheses of that theorem are not verified for the system being integrated. In particular, the conclusion that solutions eta_{kappa lambda} of equations of the form 2 D_2 eta_{kappa lambda} = f_{kappa lambda} are polynomial whenever f_{kappa lambda} is polynomial is not generally automatic and needs a detailed justification. This is load-bearing because the monomial-splitting argument and Lemma 6 presuppose polynomiality. Please either provide a complete verification of the quoted theorem's applicability or give an independent proof of polynomiality.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 3 and 4] The classifications of one- and two-dimensional subalgebras are presented as lists without derivation; a sentence explaining the adjoint-action computation and any normalization conventions would improve reproducibility.
  2. [Section 6, Proposition 8 proof] The sentence 'Separating terms with the first and zeroth degrees of u in the equations (11), we derive gamma_x = 0 and gamma_t + gamma_yy = 0' would be easier to verify if the splitting into coefficients of u and of u_yy were shown explicitly.
  3. [Throughout] Several formulas contain encoding artifacts (for example, 'beta/greaterorequalslant0' in the lists of subalgebras and table headers); these should be cleaned up in the final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central theorems are proved by direct computation; the few self-citations are methodological or supporting, not load-bearing.

full rationale

Theorem 5 is derived by reducing generalized symmetries to evolutionary form, deriving the determining equation (7), importing polynomiality from the external Olver reference [41], and then splitting by monomial degree and x/y order; the conclusion that the quotient algebra is g follows from the resulting finite coefficient system. Proposition 8 directly analyzes the cosymmetry equation (11); the highest-order term forces ord gamma = -infty, and the residual equations give gamma_x=0 and gamma_t+gamma_yy=0, after which the conserved currents (10) are computed from these data. Neither step is a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction nor a definitional identity. The citation of [37] in the proof of Proposition 8 is a proof-strategy attribution, while [46] and [54] are used for remarks and auxiliary statements about reduced equations or potential conservation laws; none of these citations supplies the central isomorphism. A possible mathematical flaw in Lemma 6 would be a correctness issue, not circularity. Score 2 reflects only the presence of minor self-citations that are not load-bearing.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; parameters such as kappa, beta, delta and delta' appearing in subalgebra lists are classification labels for G-inequivalent cases. No invented entities are introduced. The central claims rest on standard theorems of symmetry analysis, listed below; none of these theorems assumes the results being proved.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Every generalized symmetry of an evolution equation is equivalent to a reduced generalized symmetry whose characteristic is independent of t-derivatives.
    Used at the start of Section 5 to reduce the determining equation to Eq. (6); standard theory in Olver [41, Section 5.1].
  • standard math The polynomiality theorem for solutions of the determining equations: if the right-hand sides are polynomial in jet variables, then the characteristics are polynomial.
    Invoked after Eq. (8) via Theorem 5.104 and formula (5.151) of Olver [41]; this is the premise that makes the monomial-splitting argument in Lemma 6 possible.
  • standard math For evolution equations, cosymmetries and conservation-law characteristics are equivalent, and order -infinity cosymmetries are necessarily conservation-law characteristics.
    Used in Section 6 and Proposition 8 to pass from the cosymmetry equation (11) to the conserved currents (10); standard results of Vinogradov [61] and Olver [41].
  • domain assumption The algebraic method for point-symmetry groups: pushforwards of point symmetries induce automorphisms of the maximal Lie invariance algebra, and factoring out inner automorphisms together with direct constraints recovers the whole group.
    Methodological basis for Lemma 1 and Theorem 3; follows Hydon [30] and Bihlo-Popovych [9].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Extended symmetry analysis of two-dimensional degenerate Burgers equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DEV6IGUK

@misc{pith2026190801877,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Extended symmetry analysis of two-dimensional degenerate Burgers equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DEV6IGUK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01877}
}
read the original abstract

We carry out the extended symmetry analysis of a two-dimensional degenerate Burgers equation. Its complete point-symmetry group is found using the algebraic method, and all its generalized symmetries are proved equivalent to its Lie symmetries. We also prove that the space of conservation laws of this equation is infinite-dimensional and is naturally isomorphic to the solution space of the (1+1)-dimensional backward linear heat equation. Lie reductions of the two-dimensional degenerate Burgers equation are comprehensively studied in the optimal way and new Lie invariant solutions are constructed. We additionally consider solutions that also satisfy an analogous nondegenerate Burgers equation. In total, we construct four families of solutions of two-dimensional degenerate Burgers equation that are expressed in terms of arbitrary (nonzero) solutions of the (1+1)-dimensional linear heat equation. Various kinds of hidden symmetries and hidden conservation laws (local and potential ones) are discussed as well. As a by-product, we exhaustively describe generalized symmetries, cosymmetries and conservation laws of the transport equation, also called the inviscid Burgers equation, and construct new invariant solutions of the nonlinear diffusion and diffusion-convection equations with power nonlinearities of degree -1/2.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [41]

    107, Springer–Verlag, New York, 1993

    Olver P.J., Applications of Lie groups to differential equations , second edition, Graduate Texts in Mathe- matics, vol. 107, Springer–Verlag, New York, 1993

    work page 1993

  2. [1]

    and Svir- shchevskii S.R., CRC handbook of Lie group analysis of differential equations

    Ames W.F., Anderson R.L., Dorodnitsyn V.A., Ferapontov E.V., Gazizov R.K., Ibragimov N.H. and Svir- shchevskii S.R., CRC handbook of Lie group analysis of differential equations. Vol. 1. Symmetries, exact solutions and conservation laws , CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1994

    work page 1994

  3. [2]

    and Govinder K.S., Master partial d ifferential equations for a type II hidden symme- try, J

    Abraham-Shrauner B. and Govinder K.S., Master partial d ifferential equations for a type II hidden symme- try, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 343 (2008), 525–530

    work page 2008

  4. [3]

    and Stegun I., Handbook on mathematical functions, National Bureau of Standards Appl

    Abramowitz M.J. and Stegun I., Handbook on mathematical functions, National Bureau of Standards Appl. Math. Series, vol. 55, U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington , D.C., 1970

    work page 1970

  5. [4]

    and Lebowitz J.L., On the drift and diffusi on of a rod in a lattice fluid, J

    Alexander F.J. and Lebowitz J.L., On the drift and diffusi on of a rod in a lattice fluid, J. Phys. A 27 (1994), 683–696

    work page 1994

  6. [5]

    of Mathematics, Kyiv, 1990, pp

    Amerov T.K., On conditional invariance of nonlinear hea t equation, in: Algebra-theoretic analysis of equa- tions in mathematical physics , Inst. of Mathematics, Kyiv, 1990, pp. 12–14 (in Russian)

    work page 1990

  7. [6]

    and Ibragimov N.Kh., Perturba tion methods in group analysis, in Itogi Nauki i Tekhniki, Current problems in mathematics

    Baikov V.A., Gazizov R.K. and Ibragimov N.Kh., Perturba tion methods in group analysis, in Itogi Nauki i Tekhniki, Current problems in mathematics. Newest result s, vol. 34, Akad. Nauk SSSR, Vsesoyuz. Inst. Nauchn. i Tekhn. Inform., Moscow, 1989, pp. 85–147 (in Russi an); translated in J. Soviet Math. 55 (1991), 1450–1490

    work page 1991

  8. [7]

    and Marvan M., Jets

    Baran H. and Marvan M., Jets. A software for differential c alculus on jet spaces and diffieties. http://jets.math.slu.cz

    work page

Show all 62 references
  1. [8]

    Symmetry in N onlinear Mathematical Physics

    Barannyk T., Symmetry and exact solutions for systems of nonlinear reaction–diffusion equations, in Pro- ceedings of Fourth International Conference “Symmetry in N onlinear Mathematical Physics” (9–15 July, 2001, Kyiv) , Proceedings of Institute of Mathematics of NAS of Ukraine...

    2002

  2. [9]

    and Popovych R.O., Algebraic method for finding equivalence groups, J

    Bihlo A., Dos Santos Cardoso-Bihlo E. and Popovych R.O., Algebraic method for finding equivalence groups, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 621 (2015) 012001, arXiv:1503.06487

    2015 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Group Analysis of Differential Equations & Inte grable Systems

    Bihlo A. and Popovych R.O., Point symmetry group of the b arotropic vorticity equation, in Proceedings of 5th Workshop “Group Analysis of Differential Equations & Inte grable Systems” (June 6–10, 2010, Protaras, Cyprus), University of Cyprus, Nicosia, 2011, pp. 15–27, arXiv:100...

    2010 arXiv

  4. [11]

    and Anco S.C., Applications of symmetry methods to partial differential equations, Applied Mathematical Sciences 168, Springer, New York, 2010

    Bluman G.W., Cheviakov A.F. and Anco S.C., Applications of symmetry methods to partial differential equations, Applied Mathematical Sciences 168, Springer, New York, 2010

    2010

  5. [12]

    and Cole J.D., The general similarity solut ion of the heat equation, J

    Bluman G.W. and Cole J.D., The general similarity solut ion of the heat equation, J. Math. Mech. 18 (1969), 1025–1042

    1969

  6. [13]

    and Kumei S., Symmetries and differential equations , Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989

    Bluman G.W. and Kumei S., Symmetries and differential equations , Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989

    1989

  7. [14]

    and Vinogradov A.M., Symmetries and conservation laws for differen- tial equations of mathematical physics , American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1999

    Bocharov A.V., Chetverikov V.N., Duzhin S.V., Khor’ko va N.G., Krasil’shchik I.S., Samokhin A.V., Torkhov Y.N., Verbovetsky A.M. and Vinogradov A.M., Symmetries and conservation laws for differen- tial equations of mathematical physics , American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1999

    1999

  8. [15]

    and Popovych R.O., Singular re duction modules of differential equations, J

    Boyko V.M., Kunzinger M. and Popovych R.O., Singular re duction modules of differential equations, J. Math. Phys. 57 (2016), 101503, arXiv:1201.3223

    2016 arXiv

  9. [16]

    and Pliukhin O., Nonlinear reaction-diffusion-convection equations, Monographs and Research Notes in Mathematics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 20 18

    Cherniha R., Serov M. and Pliukhin O., Nonlinear reaction-diffusion-convection equations, Monographs and Research Notes in Mathematics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 20 18

  10. [17]

    and Vu K., Symbolic computation and differe ntial equations: Lie symmetries, J

    Carminati J. and Vu K., Symbolic computation and differe ntial equations: Lie symmetries, J. Symbolic Comput. 29 (2000), 95–116

    2000

  11. [18]

    and Polidoro S., On the regularity of solutions to a nonlinear ultraparabolic equation arising in mathematical finance, Differential Integral Equations 14 (2001), 701–738

    Citti G., Pascucci A. and Polidoro S., On the regularity of solutions to a nonlinear ultraparabolic equation arising in mathematical finance, Differential Integral Equations 14 (2001), 701–738

    2001

  12. [19]

    and Sophocleous C., On the c lassification of similarity solutions of a two- dimensional diffusion–advection equation, Appl

    Demetriou E., Christou M.A. and Sophocleous C., On the c lassification of similarity solutions of a two- dimensional diffusion–advection equation, Appl. Math. Comput. 187 (2007), 1333–1350

    2007

  13. [20]

    and Sophocleous C., Group an alysis of (2+1)- and (3+1)-dimensional diffusion– convection equations, J

    Demetriou E., Ivanova N.M. and Sophocleous C., Group an alysis of (2+1)- and (3+1)-dimensional diffusion– convection equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 348 (2008), 55–65

    2008

  14. [21]

    Dorodnitsyn V.A., On invariant solutions of non-linea r heat equation with a source, Zhurn. Vych. Matemat. Matemat. Fiziki 22 (1982), 1393–1400 (in Russian)

    1982

  15. [22]

    and Popovych R.O., Compl ete point symmetry group of the barotropic vorticity equation on a rotating sphere, J

    Dos Santos Cardoso-Bihlo E.M. and Popovych R.O., Compl ete point symmetry group of the barotropic vorticity equation on a rotating sphere, J. Engrg. Math. 82 (2013), 31–38, arXiv:1206.6919

    2013 arXiv

  16. [23]

    and Broadbridge P., Exceptional symmetry reductions of Burgers’ equation in two and three spatial dimensions, Z

    Edwards M.P. and Broadbridge P., Exceptional symmetry reductions of Burgers’ equation in two and three spatial dimensions, Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 46 (1995), 595–622

    1995

  17. [24]

    and El-Shewy E.K., N ew travelling wave solutions for an asymmetric model of a rod in a lattice fluid with nonlinear advection, Z

    Elwakil S.A., Zahran M.A., Sabry R. and El-Shewy E.K., N ew travelling wave solutions for an asymmetric model of a rod in a lattice fluid with nonlinear advection, Z. Naturforsch. 61a (2006), 430–438

    2006

  18. [25]

    and Zuazua E., Entropy soluti ons for diffusion-convection equations with partial diffusivity, Trans

    Escobedo M., Vazquez J.L. and Zuazua E., Entropy soluti ons for diffusion-convection equations with partial diffusivity, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 343 (1994), 829–842

    1994

  19. [26]

    and Nikitin A.G., Symmetries of equations of quantum mechanics , Allerton Press, Inc., New York, 1994

    Fushchich W.I. and Nikitin A.G., Symmetries of equations of quantum mechanics , Allerton Press, Inc., New York, 1994

    1994

  20. [28]

    and Popovych R.O., Symmetry reduction a nd exact solutions of the Navier–Stokes equa- tions

    Fushchych W.I. and Popovych R.O., Symmetry reduction a nd exact solutions of the Navier–Stokes equa- tions. II, J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. 1 (1994), 158–188, arXiv:math-ph/0207016

    1994 arXiv

  21. [29]

    and Neeb K.H., Structure and geometry of Lie groups , Springer Science & Business Media, 2011

    Hilgert J. and Neeb K.H., Structure and geometry of Lie groups , Springer Science & Business Media, 2011

    2011

  22. [30]

    Hydon P.E., How to construct the discrete symmetries of partial differential equations, Eur. J. Appl. Math. 11 (2000), 515–527

    2000

  23. [31]

    Ibragimov N.H., A new conservation theorem, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 333 (2007), 311–328

    2007

  24. [32]

    Partial Differ

    Ivanova N.M., Exact solutions of diffusion-convection equations, Dyn. Partial Differ. Equ. 5 (2008), 139–171, arXiv:0710.4000

    2008 arXiv

  25. [33]

    and Tracin` a R., Lie group analysis of two-dimensional variable-coefficient Burgers equation, Z

    Ivanova N.M., Sophocleous C. and Tracin` a R., Lie group analysis of two-dimensional variable-coefficient Burgers equation, Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 61 (2010), 793–809

    2010

  26. [34]

    King J.R., Some non-self-similar solutions to a nonlin ear diffusion equation, J. Phys. A 25 (1992), 4861–4868

    1992

  27. [35]

    and Sophocleous C., On form-preserving p oint transformations of partial differential equa- tions, J

    Kingston J.G. and Sophocleous C., On form-preserving p oint transformations of partial differential equa- tions, J. Phys. A 31 (1998), 1597–1619

    1998

  28. [36]

    Kapitanskii L.V., Group analysis of the Navier–Stokes and Euler equations in the presence of rotation symmetry and new exact solutions to these equations, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 243 (1978), 901–904

    1978

  29. [37]

    and Sophocleous C., Enh anced symmetry analysis of two-dimensional Burg- ers system, Acta Appl

    Kontogiorgis S., Popovych R.O. and Sophocleous C., Enh anced symmetry analysis of two-dimensional Burg- ers system, Acta Appl. Math. 163 (2019), 91–128, arXiv:1709.02708

    2019 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Nonlinear Sci

    Kudryashov N.A., Seven common errors in finding exact so lutions of nonlinear differential equations, Com- mun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. , 2009, 14, 3507–3529. 25

    2009

  31. [39]

    Lanconelli E., Pascucci A. and Polidoro S., Linear and n onlinear ultraparabolic equations of Kolmogorov type arising in diffusion theory and in finance, in Nonlinear problems in mathematical physics and related topics, II , Int. Math. Ser. (N. Y.), vol. 2, Kluwer/Plenum, New Yo...

  32. [40]

    Marvan M., Sufficient set of integrability conditions of an orthonomic system, Found. Comp. Math. 9 (2009), 651–674, arXiv:nlin/0605009

    2009 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Ovsiannikov L.V., Group properties of nonlinear heat e quation, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 125 (1959), 492–495 (in Russian)

    1959

  34. [43]

    Ovsiannikov L.V., Group analysis of differential equations , Academic Press, New York, 1982

    1982

  35. [44]

    and Polidoro S., On the Cauchy problem for a n onlinear Kolmogorov equation, SIAM J

    Pascucci A. and Polidoro S., On the Cauchy problem for a n onlinear Kolmogorov equation, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 35 (2003), 579–595

    2003

  36. [45]

    and Popovych R.O., Reduction operators and exact solutions of generalized Burgers equa- tions, Phys

    Pocheketa O.A. and Popovych R.O., Reduction operators and exact solutions of generalized Burgers equa- tions, Phys. Lett. A 376 (2012), 2847–2850, arXiv:1112.6394

    2012 arXiv

  37. [46]

    and Popovych R.O., Extended symmetry an alysis of generalized Burgers equations, J

    Pocheketa O.A. and Popovych R.O., Extended symmetry an alysis of generalized Burgers equations, J. Math. Phys. 58 (2017), 101501, arXiv:1603.09377

    2017 arXiv

  38. [47]

    and Vaneeva O.O., Group c lassification and exact solutions of variable- coefficient generalized Burgers equations with linear dampi ng, Appl

    Pocheketa O.A., Popovych R.O. and Vaneeva O.O., Group c lassification and exact solutions of variable- coefficient generalized Burgers equations with linear dampi ng, Appl. Math. Comput. 243 (2014), 232–244, arXiv:1308.4265

    2014 arXiv

  39. [48]

    and Zaitsev V.F., Handbook of nonlinear partial differential equations , second edition, Chap- man & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2012

    Polyanin A.D. and Zaitsev V.F., Handbook of nonlinear partial differential equations , second edition, Chap- man & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2012

    2012

  40. [49]

    Nonlinear Math

    Popovych R.O., On Lie reduction of the Navier–Stokes eq uations, J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. 2 (1995), 301– 311

    1995

  41. [50]

    and Bihlo A., Symmetry preserving parame terization schemes, J

    Popovych R.O. and Bihlo A., Symmetry preserving parame terization schemes, J. Math. Phys. 53 (2012), 073102, arXiv:1010.3010

    2012 arXiv

  42. [51]

    and Bihlo A., Inverse problem on conserva tion laws, Phys

    Popovych R.O. and Bihlo A., Inverse problem on conserva tion laws, Phys. D 401 (2020), 132175, arXiv:1705.03547

    2020 arXiv

  43. [52]

    and Lutfull in M.W., Realizations of real low-dimensional Lie algebras, J

    Popovych R.O., Boyko V.M., Nesterenko M.O. and Lutfull in M.W., Realizations of real low-dimensional Lie algebras, J. Phys. A 36 (2003), 7337–7360, see arXiv:math-ph/0301029v7 for an extended and revised version

    2003 arXiv

  44. [53]

    and Ivanova N.M., Hierarchy of conservat ion laws of diffusion-convection equations, J

    Popovych R.O. and Ivanova N.M., Hierarchy of conservat ion laws of diffusion-convection equations, J. Math. Phys. 46 (2005), 043502, arXiv:math-ph/0407008

    2005 arXiv

  45. [54]

    and Ivanova N.M., Conserva tion laws and potential symmetries of linear parabolic equations, Acta Appl

    Popovych R.O., Kunzinger M. and Ivanova N.M., Conserva tion laws and potential symmetries of linear parabolic equations, Acta Appl. Math. 100 (2008), 113–185, arXiv:0706.0443

    2008 arXiv

  46. [55]

    and Vaneeva O.O., More common errors in fin ding exact solutions of nonlinear differential equations

    Popovych R.O. and Vaneeva O.O., More common errors in fin ding exact solutions of nonlinear differential equations. I, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 15 (2010), 3887–3899, arXiv:0911.1848

    2010 arXiv

  47. [56]

    and Popovych R.O., Multi-dimens ional quasi-simple waves in weakly dissipative flows, Phys

    Rajaee L., Eshraghi H. and Popovych R.O., Multi-dimens ional quasi-simple waves in weakly dissipative flows, Phys. D 237 (2008), 405–419

    2008

  48. [57]

    and Stogniy V., Group c lassification of a class of generalized nonlinear Kolmogorov equations and exact solutions, J

    Rassokha I., Serov M., Spichak S. and Stogniy V., Group c lassification of a class of generalized nonlinear Kolmogorov equations and exact solutions, J. Math. Phys. 596 (2018), 071514

    2018

  49. [58]

    and Abd El-Rahman R.G., Analytic solutions f or asymmetric model of a rod in a lattice fluid, J

    Saied E.A. and Abd El-Rahman R.G., Analytic solutions f or asymmetric model of a rod in a lattice fluid, J. Stat. Phys. 94 (1999), 639–652

    1999

  50. [59]

    and Leach P.G.L., Lie symm etries of generalized Burgers equations: appli- cation to boundary-value problems, J

    Vaneeva O.O., Sophocleous C. and Leach P.G.L., Lie symm etries of generalized Burgers equations: appli- cation to boundary-value problems, J. Engrg. Math. 91 (2015), 165–176, arXiv:1303.3548

    2015 arXiv

  51. [60]

    and Sophocleous C., Group ana lysis of a class of nonlinear Kolmogorov equa- tions, in: Dobrev V

    Vaneeva O., Karadzhov Yu. and Sophocleous C., Group ana lysis of a class of nonlinear Kolmogorov equa- tions, in: Dobrev V. (ed.) Lie Theory and Its Applications in Physics. LT 2015 , Springer Proc. Math. Stat., vol 191., Springer, Singapore, 2016, pp. 349–360, arXiv:1509.04481

    2015 arXiv

  52. [61]

    Vinogradov A.M., Local symmetries and conservation la ws, Acta Appl. Math. 2 (1984), 21–78

    1984

  53. [62]

    and Carminati J., Similarity soluti ons of partial differential equations using DESOL V, Comput

    Vu K.T., Butcher J. and Carminati J., Similarity soluti ons of partial differential equations using DESOL V, Comput. Phys. Comm. 176 (2007), 682–693

    2007

  54. [63]

    67, Academic Press, New York– London, 1975

    Widder D.V., The heat equation , Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 67, Academic Press, New York– London, 1975. 26

    1975

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.