Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 66 references

Beyond the mini-solar maximum of solar cycle 24: Declining solar magnetic fields and the response of the terrestrial magnetosphere

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Earth's magnetopause has expanded by about 15 percent since the mid-1990s, and this paper ties that expansion to a two-decade decline in solar magnetic fields.

desk verdict The ~15% magnetopause expansion is a model-output trend that is plausible but not validated, and its magnitude is weaker than claimed once you account for the pressure scaling; the paper is still a useful update with some new comparative material. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02576 v1 pith:I2ZV2AWS submitted 2019-08-06 astro-ph.SR physics.space-ph

M. Ingale , P. Janardhan , S. K. Bisoi This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRphysics.space-ph
keywords magnetopausestand-offdistancesolarcycle24magneticfielddeclinewindmicro-turbulenceinterplanetaryscintillationbowshockspaceweathergeostationaryorbit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that the long-term decline in solar high-latitude magnetic fields that began in the mid-1990s has physically reached Earth: the solar wind has become weaker and less turbulent, and the terrestrial magnetosphere has responded by inflating. By feeding four decades of solar wind measurements through both empirical and numerical models, the authors find that the subsolar stand-off distance of the magnetopause has risen steadily by about 15 percent, from roughly $9.7$ to $10.7$ Earth radii, with a similar expansion of the bow shock and of the magnetopause shape. The claim matters because it connects a solar-cycle-scale change at the Sun to the size of Earth's protective magnetic bubble, implying that satellite exposure and space-weather conditions are changing on decadal timescales.

What carries the argument

The central quantity is the subsolar stand-off distance of the magnetopause, $r_{mp}$, the distance from Earth's center to the dayside boundary of the magnetosphere along the Sun-Earth line. The paper computes it with two independent tools: an empirical model in which $r_{mp}$ is a fitted function of solar wind dynamic plus magnetic pressure and IMF $B_z$, and a global MHD simulation-based model with a similar power-law dependence on dynamic pressure. Pressure balance with Earth's dipole field is the physical mechanism: weaker solar wind dynamic pressure lets the boundary sit farther out. The same daily pressure and IMF inputs drive bow shock stand-off distances through an empirical power law and an MHD-based model that also includes Alfvén Mach number, and the magnetopause shape is traced through a flaring-angle formula parametrized by pressure and $B_z$.

What would settle it

Compile actual magnetopause crossing distances from 1995–2017 and check whether their subsolar distances cluster around the model-computed $10.7\,R_E$ average rather than the $9.7\,R_E$ baseline; a flat or declining observed trend would disprove the claimed 15 percent expansion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the terrestrial magnetopause has been inflating for more than two decades: using daily solar wind measurements from 1975–2017 as input to an empirical magnetopause model and to a global MHD-based numerical model, the paper finds a steady increase of about 15 percent in the subsolar stand-off distance beginning in the mid-1990s, with the 1974–1994 average at $9.7\,R_E$ and the 1995–2017 average at $10.7\,R_E$. The same inputs drive a corresponding expansion of the bow shock stand-off distance and of the dayside magnetopause shape, and the paper reports a more than 40 percent increase after 1995 in days when the bow shock stands well beyond its average position. These changes are interpreted as the magnetosphere's response to a sustained decline in solar high-latitude photospheric fields, solar wind micro-turbulence, and 1 AU solar wind parameters such as IMF strength and dynamic pressure. The paper also forecasts the 2020 solar-minimum magnetopause shape as larger than in 1996 but smaller than in 2008, and it highlights three events when the computed magnetopause distance fell close to geostationary orbit at $6.6\,R_E$, warning that such compressions threaten satellites.

Load-bearing premise

The entire inference hangs on the assumption that the empirical and numerical magnetopause models, calibrated on spacecraft crossings from various eras, stay unbiased under the unusually weak solar wind conditions after 1995; a systematic bias at low dynamic pressure would manufacture the 15 percent expansion from nothing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the magnetopause stand-off distance really has risen about 15 percent since the mid-1990s, the average protective boundary now sits roughly $1\,R_E$ farther out during ordinary solar wind conditions than it did during cycles 21–22.
  • The decline in solar wind dynamic pressure and IMF strength shifts the statistics of extreme compressions: events pushing the magnetopause down to geostationary orbit at $6.6\,R_E$ become less frequent, though the 2005 event shows they still occur.
  • The forecast magnetopause shape at the 2020 minimum, larger than in 1996 but smaller than in 2008, implies the expansion is not monotonic and will track the strength of the upcoming cycle.
  • If the decline in high-latitude photospheric fields continues through 2020 and beyond, the paper expects a weaker cycle 25 and, eventually, a prolonged low-activity state reminiscent of a grand solar minimum.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test the paper leaves open is to compare the model-computed daily stand-off distances against actual magnetopause crossings from 1995–2017; if observed crossings do not track the $10.7\,R_E$ average, the expansion is a modeling artifact rather than a physical change.
  • The same solar-wind pressure decline should have inflated the magnetospheres of other magnetized planets and the heliosphere itself; this is a neighboring prediction that follows from the paper's pressure-based mechanism but is not tested here.
  • The 2020 shape forecast rests mainly on dynamic pressure because the paper finds IMF $B_z$ essentially stochastic; re-running the forecast with $B_z$ fixed to zero would quantify how much of the predicted shape change is pressure-driven.
  • The paper's argument implies that satellite operators' radiation-belt and surface-charging risk assessments should incorporate the decadal drift in magnetopause location, not just solar-cycle phase; that application is not developed in the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses public OMNI solar wind data (1975–2017), NSO/KP and SOLIS synoptic magnetograms, and ISEE IPS scintillation measurements to document long-term declines in solar high-latitude photospheric fields, inner-heliospheric microturbulence, and 1 AU solar wind parameters. It passes daily dynamic pressure and IMF-Bz through two magnetopause stand-off models (Lin et al. 2010, Eq. 2; Lu et al. 2011, Eq. 6), two bow shock models (Jelinek et al. 2012, Eq. 9; Chapman and Cairns 2003, Eq. 10), computes magnetopause shapes at solar minima, and reports that the subsolar stand-off distance has increased by about 15% since the mid-1990s irrespective of model, with more than 40% more bow-shock 'events' after 1995 and an expanded magnetopause shape between 1996 and 2008. It identifies three 1978/1991/2005 events with stand-off distances near 6.6 Earth radii and forecasts an expanded magnetopause shape for 2020 using ARIMA extrapolation of Bz and Pd.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a coherent end-to-end picture from declining solar polar fields to a statistically measurable expansion of the terrestrial magnetosphere over four solar cycles, with practical implications for geostationary satellite exposure. The analysis is transparent and largely reproducible: the formulas are published, the OMNI/NSO/IPS data are public, and the computed trends are deterministic functions of the input time series. The reported increase is also qualitatively consistent with McComas et al. (2013) and Samsonov et al. (2019). However, the specific 15% magnitude and the claim of model-independence are not yet established, because the two magnetopause models are not independent and neither is validated against in-situ boundary crossings in the low-pressure post-1995 regime. The manuscript currently supports a weaker statement: model-predicted stand-off distance has increased.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.1 (Eqs. 2 and 6)] The central claim of a ~15% secular increase in subsolar stand-off distance is never checked against direct observations of the magnetopause or bow shock during 1975–2017. Equations (2) and (6) are both pressure-driven fits whose calibration data are concentrated at ordinary solar-wind conditions; the post-1995 interval is dominated by low dynamic pressures, where the fits are least constrained. Because every trend line in Fig. 6 is obtained by feeding the same OMNI pressure series through these monotone formulas, a systematic low-pressure bias in either model would masquerade as an expansion. I ask the authors to validate the predicted stand-off distances against spacecraft crossings (e.g., THEMIS, Geotail, Cluster, or MMS) in the post-1995 interval, or at least to tabulate model residuals versus Pd in bins covering the low-pressure regime.
  2. [§5.1 and §6] The reported magnitude of the trend is not internally consistent. Section 6 states the 1974–1994 and 1995–2017 epoch-mean stand-off distances as 9.7 and 10.7 Earth radii, which is a ~10% increase, while §5.1 reports '~15%' from the 11-year moving average. The mean Pd decline from ~2.9 to ~2.0 nPa, inserted into the Pd^{-1/5.2} law of Eq. (6), yields only ~7% expansion, so the remaining ~8 percentage points of the 15% claim (or ~3 percentage points of the epoch-mean claim) must come from Bz and magnetic-pressure terms plus endpoint effects of the 11-year smoother. The paper should state explicitly which quantity the 15% refers to and should report the trend with a standard error obtained from a well-defined detrending procedure.
  3. [§3.1.2 and §5.1] The agreement between L10 and L11 is presented as evidence that the trend is model-independent, but Eq. (6) is not a numerical simulation of the 1975–2017 interval; it is an analytic power-law fit to SWMF runs, with the same Shue-type functional dependence on Pd and Bz as the empirical L10 formula. The two models are therefore strongly correlated by construction, and their agreement cannot confirm the low-pressure behavior. An independent check, such as a non-pressure-based magnetopause model, a machine-learning model with different inputs, or direct boundary crossings, is needed before the claim 'irrespective of the empirical or numerical model used' can be supported.
  4. [§5.2 and Appendix A] The 2020 magnetopause-shape forecast relies on an ARIMA forecast of Bz that the authors themselves describe as 'a simple linear extrapolation curve without any variations' (Appendix A). The 95% confidence band in Fig. 8 is propagated from the ARIMA fit and does not include the acknowledged failure of the Bz model or the uncertainty of the linear extrapolation of photospheric fields and scintillation index beyond 2017. Please reframe this as an illustrative scenario and provide a sensitivity check on the assumed Bz and on the continued linear decline.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract; Table 1] The abstract says 'two instances between 1968 and 1991,' while Table 1 lists 1978-06-02 and 1991-06-05 and the text says 'between the year 1968 and 1995'; these date ranges should be made consistent.
  2. [§5.1, Fig. 7] The sentence describing 'a significant increase in the number of events with the BS stand-off distance exceeding well below the average value' is self-contradictory; clarify whether the events exceed or fall below the average stand-off distance.
  3. [§6, Figs. 3–4] The word 'causal' is used for correlations between B, Pd, and solar polar fields; because the 27-day averaged data are serially correlated, the effective degrees of freedom are much lower than n = 571, so the 99% significance levels should be evaluated with autocorrelation-aware tests or at least stated with this caveat.
  4. [§2.3; §6] The data period is Feb. 1975 through Dec. 2017, but the text repeatedly refers to 1974–1994 epoch averages; clarify whether pre-1975 data are used or whether 1974 is a calendar-year indexing convention.
  5. [Appendix A] The ARIMA orders are reported for Bz and Pd but not for rmp; state the rmp model orders or explain explicitly why only Bz and Pd are modeled.
  6. [§5.1, Fig. 6] The 11-year moving average is applied to daily values, but the paper does not specify whether the window is centered or trailing; this matters because the reported 15% increase is read from that smoothed curve.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the magnetopause stand-off increase is a forward-model consequence of independently observed OMNI pressure/IMF inputs, and the solar-field decline is re-derived from external magnetogram and IPS data, so no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central trend is obtained by inserting daily OMNI dynamic pressure and IMF-Bz into four externally calibrated models: L10 eq. (2), L11 eq. (6), J12 eq. (9), and CC03 eq. (10). None of these models is fitted in the present paper, and none is fitted to the 1975-2017 stand-off distance time series that constitutes the target quantity. The reported ~15% increase in rmp is therefore a forward-model implication of the independently observed decline in Pd and Bz, not a parameter fit to the target data and then relabeled as a prediction. The solar high-latitude field decline, which is the external correlate, is re-derived in Fig. 1 from NSO/KP and SOLIS synoptic magnetograms and ISEE IPS scintillation data; the self-citations to Janardhan et al. and Bisoi et al. are pointers to earlier analyses of the same or related data, not the sole evidence. The 2020 forecast is an ARIMA extrapolation of OMNI Pd/Bz fed through the same published models; its validation against 2018-2019 observed OMNI Pd is legitimate, and comparing predicted rmp with model-estimated rmp is a self-consistency check rather than the basis of the main claim. Correlations between Pd/B and polar fields are statistical associations, not circular derivations. Concerns about the non-independence of the L10 and L11 functional forms and about extrapolation into low-dynamic-pressure regimes are correctness and validation risks, which the circularity rules exclude unless a specific reduction to fitted inputs is exhibited; no such reduction appears in the text.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on publicly available solar wind data and externally calibrated models. No new physical entities are introduced. The main free parameters are the ARIMA orders and the linear extrapolations used for the 2020 forecast; these do not affect the historical trend result, which is a deterministic function of the observed Pd and Bz through the model equations.

free parameters (3)
  • ARIMA model orders for Bz and Pd = Bz: (1,0,1)x(0,0,1,12); Pd: (1,1,1)x(0,0,1,12)
    Selected by AIC grid search over the monthly Bz and Pd time series; used to forecast 2020 conditions.
  • 2020 high-latitude field extrapolation = 2.2 ± 0.08 G
    Extrapolation of the linear best fit to 1995-2017 annual mean Bp values to 2020.
  • 2020 scintillation index extrapolation = 0.44
    Extrapolation of the linear best fit to 1983-2017 annual mean IPS scintillation values to 2020.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The empirical and numerical magnetopause and bow shock models (L10, L11, J12, CC03) are valid for the solar wind conditions encountered since the mid-1990s.
    The paper assumes these externally calibrated models accurately predict stand-off distances from Pd and Bz over 1975-2017, without direct validation in this period (Section 3).
  • domain assumption The declining trend in solar high-latitude photospheric fields will continue at least until 2020.
    Used to extrapolate Bp and to justify the 2020 MP shape forecast (Sections 2.1 and 5.2).
  • domain assumption The effect of Earth's dipole tilt and secular dipole decay on MP shape is negligible for this study.
    Quantified as about 0.3 R_E per century and neglected (Section 4).
  • domain assumption The IMF orientation angle is fixed at 90 degrees for the CC03 bow shock model.
    Simplifies the bow shock calculation but may introduce bias for varying IMF orientations (Section 3.2.2).
  • domain assumption Correlations between Bp and B/Pd indicate a causal connection between polar field decline and solar wind weakening.
    The paper uses correlation coefficients (r=0.40-0.95) to assert a causal link, but correlation does not establish cause (Sections 2.3, 6).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Beyond the mini-solar maximum of solar cycle 24: Declining solar magnetic fields and the response of the terrestrial magnetosphere." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I2ZV2AWS

@misc{pith2026190802576,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Beyond the mini-solar maximum of solar cycle 24: Declining solar magnetic fields and the response of the terrestrial magnetosphere},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I2ZV2AWS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02576}
}
abstract

The present study examines the response of the terrestrial magnetosphere to the long-term steady declining trends observed in solar magnetic fields and solar wind micro-turbulence levels since mid-1990's that has been continuing beyond the mini-solar maximum of cycle 24. A detailed analysis of the response of the terrestrial magnetosphere has been carried out by studying the extent and shape of the Earth's magnetopause and bow shock over the past four solar cycles. We estimate sub-solar stand-off distance of the magnetopause and bow shock, and the shape of the magnetopause using numerical as well as empirical models. The computed magnetopause and bow shock stand-off distances have been found to be increasing steadily since around mid-1990's, consistent with the steady declining trend seen in solar magnetic fields and solar wind micro-turbulence levels. Similarly, we find an expansion in the shape of the magnetopause since 1996. The implications of the increasing trend seen in the magnetopause and bow shock stand-off distances are discussed and a forecast of the shape of the magnetopause in 2020, the minimum of cycle 24, has been made. Importantly, we also find two instances between 1968 and 1991 when the magnetopause stand-off distance dropped to values close to 6.6 earth radii, the geostationary orbit, for duration ranging from 9$-$11 hours and one event in 2005, post 1995 when the decline in photospheric fields began. Though there have been no such events since 2005, it represents a clear and present danger to our satellite systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.02576 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Solar high-latitude photospheric magnetic fields in the latitude range 45◦ − −78◦ for the period Feb. 1975−Dec. 2017 (upper panel) and solar wind micro-turbulence levels from 327 MHz IPS observations in the period 1983−2017 and in the distance range 0.2−0.8 AU (lower panel). The filled grey dots in both panels are actual measurements of magnetic fields (top) and solar wind micro-turbulence (bottom), while the open b… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Carrington rotation-averaged insitu measurements of solar wind parameters at 1 AU (first to eighth panels) Bz, B, v, Np, Tp, Pd, He++/H+, and R, respectively, for the period Feb. 1975–Dec. 2017, covering solar cycles 21–24. The vertical gray bars demarcate 1 year inter￾vals during the minima of solar cycles 20–23. The solid horizontal lines in third and fourth panels are drawn to indicate the average values of v and… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Fig.2. While the average decline in P [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: B (left panel) and Pd (right panel) as function of Bp for the period Feb. 1975–Dec. 2017. The respective Pearson’s correlation coefficients of r = 0.40 and 0.43 with confidence inter￾vals of 99% are indicated in the top right corners of the panels. The filled black and…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: B (left panel) and Pd (right panel) as function of Bp for one year interval period during the minima of cycles 20–23. The respective Pearsons correlation coefficients, r = 0.50 and 0.62, with confidence intervals are indicated in the top right corner of each panel, res…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows a schematic representation (not to scale) of the position and shape of the MP and BS in the GSM coordinate system wherein, the earth is considered to be at the origin. The x-axis is along the sun-earth line, the z-axis is perpendicular to the plane of the earth’s…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Carrington-rotation averages of MP stand-off distance for the period Feb. 1975−Dec. 2017 (grey filled circles) derived using Lin et al. (2010) (L10) (upper panel) and Lu et al. (2011) (L11) (lower panel). The blue circles represent annual averages shown with 1σ error b…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: shows the BS stand-off distances obtained by using the empirical model (J12, §3.2.1) (left panels) and the numerical model (CC03, §3.2.2) (right panels). The upper panel of Fig.7 shows the daily averaged value of the normalized BS stand-off distances from Feb. 1975 to …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The one year averaged MP shape at solar minima for cycles 20-24 shown by a plot of transverse radial distance of MP, Rs against the extent of the MP along the sun-earth line, Xs. The upper panel uses Lin et al. (2010) (L10) (§3.1.1) and the lower panel uses Lu et al. (…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , Balasubramanian , V

    ABJ95 APACrefauthors Ananthakrishnan , S. , Balasubramanian , V. \ Janardhan , P. APACrefauthors \ 1995 04 . Latitudinal Variation of Solar Wind Velocity Latitudinal Variation of Solar Wind Velocity . 72 229-232 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/BF00768784 APACrefDOI

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00768784 1995

  2. [2]

    , Coles , W A

    ACK80 APACrefauthors Ananthakrishnan , S. , Coles , W A. \ Kaufman , J J. APACrefauthors \ 1980 11 . Microturbulence in solar wind streams Microturbulence in solar wind streams . 85 6025-6030 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/JA085iA11p06025 APACrefDOI

    doi:10.1029/ja085ia11p06025 1980

  3. [3]

    , Janardhan , P

    BaJ03 APACrefauthors Balasubramanian , V. , Janardhan , P. , Srinivasan , S. \ Ananthakrishnan , S. APACrefauthors \ 2003 03 . Interplanetary scintillation observations of the solar wind disappearance event of May 1999 Interplanetary scintillation observations of the solar wind disappearance event of May 1999 . 108 1121-+ . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/2002JA00...

    work page doi:10.1029/2002ja009516 2003

  4. [4]

    APACrefauthors \ 1960

    Bea60 APACrefauthors Beard , D B. APACrefauthors \ 1960 . 65 3559-3568 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/JZ065i011p03559 APACrefDOI

    work page doi:10.1029/jz065i011p03559 1960

  5. [5]

    \ Nandy , D

    BNa18 APACrefauthors Bhowmik , P. \ Nandy , D. APACrefauthors \ 2018 12 . Prediction of the strength and timing of sunspot cycle 25 reveal decadal-scale space environmental conditions Prediction of the strength and timing of sunspot cycle 25 reveal decadal-scale space environmental conditions . Nature Communications . APACrefDOI doi:10.1038/s41467-018-076...

    doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07690-0 2018

  6. [6]

    , Janardhan , P

    BiJ14 APACrefauthors Bisoi , S K. , Janardhan , P. , Chakrabarty , D. , Ananthakrishnan , S. \ Divekar , A. APACrefauthors \ 2014 01 . Changes in Quasi-periodic Variations of Solar Photospheric Fields: Precursor to the Deep Solar Minimum in Cycle 23? Changes in Quasi-periodic Variations of Solar Photospheric Fields: Precursor to the Deep Solar Minimum in ...

    doi:10.1007/s11207-013-0335-3 2014

  7. [7]

    , Janardhan , P

    BiJ14b APACrefauthors Bisoi , S K. , Janardhan , P. , Ingale , M. , Subramanian , P. , Ananthakrishnan , S. , Tokumaru , M. \ Fujiki , K. APACrefauthors \ 2014 08 . A study of density modulation index in the inner heliospheric solar wind during solar cycle 23 A study of density modulation index in the inner heliospheric solar wind during solar cycle 23 . 793 8-15

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    , Eastman , T E

    BoE00 APACrefauthors Boardsen , S A. , Eastman , T E. , Sotirelis , T. \ Green, J L. APACrefauthors \ 2000 . 105 23,193–23,219 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/1998JA000143 APACrefDOI

    work page doi:10.1029/1998ja000143 2000

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    APACrefauthors \ 2017

    Bro17 APACrefauthors Brownlee, J. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Introduction to Time Series Forecasting with Python: How to Prepare Data and Develop Models to Predict the Future Introduction to time series forecasting with python: How to prepare data and develop models to predict th...

    2017

  2. [10]

    \ Grabbe , C L

    CGr94 APACrefauthors Cairns , I H. \ Grabbe , C L. APACrefauthors \ 1994 12 . Towards an MHD theory for the standoff distance of Earth's bow shock Towards an MHD theory for the standoff distance of Earth's bow shock . 21 2781-2784 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/94GL02551 APACrefDOI

    1994 doi

  3. [11]

    \ Lyon , J G

    CLy95 APACrefauthors Cairns , I H. \ Lyon , J G. APACrefauthors \ 1995 09 . MHD simulations of Earth's bow shock at low Mach numbers: Standoff distances MHD simulations of Earth's bow shock at low Mach numbers: Standoff distances . 100 17173-17180 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/95JA...

    1995 doi

  4. [12]

    \ Lyon , J G

    CLy96 APACrefauthors Cairns , I H. \ Lyon , J G. APACrefauthors \ 1996 . Magnetic field orientation effects on the standoff distance of Earth's bow shock Magnetic field orientation effects on the standoff distance of Earth's bow shock . 23 2883-2886 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/96...

    1996 doi

  5. [13]

    , Jiang , J

    CJS16 APACrefauthors Cameron , R H. , Jiang , J. \ Sch \"u ssler , M. APACrefauthors \ 2016 06 . Solar Cycle 25: Another Moderate Cycle? Solar Cycle 25: Another Moderate Cycle? 823 L22 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3847/2041-8205/823/2/L22 APACrefDOI

    2016 doi

  6. [14]

    \ Cairns , I H

    CCa03 APACrefauthors Chapman , J F. \ Cairns , I H. APACrefauthors \ 2003 05 . Three-dimensional modeling of Earth's bow shock: Shock shape as a function of Alfv \'e n Mach number Three-dimensional modeling of Earth's bow shock: Shock shape as a function of Alfv \'e n Mach num...

    2003 doi

  7. [15]

    \ Ferraro , V C A

    CFe31 APACrefauthors Chapman , S. \ Ferraro , V C A. APACrefauthors \ 1931 . A new theory of magnetic storms. Terrestrial Magnetism and Atmospheric Electricity A new theory of magnetic storms. Terrestrial Magnetism and Atmospheric Electricity . Terr. Magn. Atmos. Electr. 36 77...

    1931 doi

  8. [16]

    APACrefauthors \ 2011 12

    Tom11 APACrefauthors de Toma , G. APACrefauthors \ 2011 12 . Evolution of Coronal Holes and Implications for High-Speed Solar Wind During the Minimum Between Cycles 23 and 24 Evolution of Coronal Holes and Implications for High-Speed Solar Wind During the Minimum Between Cycle...

    2011 doi

  9. [17]

    \ Choudhuri , A R

    DCh93 APACrefauthors D'Silva , S. \ Choudhuri , A R. APACrefauthors \ 1993 05 . A theoretical model for tilts of bipolar magnetic regions A theoretical model for tilts of bipolar magnetic regions . 272 621

    1993

  10. [18]

    \ Winglee , R M

    EWi97 APACrefauthors Elsen , R K. \ Winglee , R M. APACrefauthors \ 1997 03 . The average shape of the Magnetopause: A comparison of three-dimensional global MHD and empirical models The average shape of the Magnetopause: A comparison of three-dimensional global MHD and empiri...

    1997 doi

  11. [19]

    APACrefauthors \ 1971

    Fai71 APACrefauthors Fairfield , D H. APACrefauthors \ 1971 . Average and unusual locations of the Earth's magnetopause and bow shock Average and unusual locations of the Earth's magnetopause and bow shock . 76 6700 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/JA076i028p06700 APACrefDOI

    1971 doi

  12. [20]

    , Cairns , I H

    FaC01 APACrefauthors Fairfield , D H. , Cairns , I H. , Desch , M D. , Szabo , A. , Lazarus , A J. \ Aellig , M R. APACrefauthors \ 2001 11 . The location of low Mach number bow shocks at Earth The location of low Mach number bow shocks at Earth . 106 25361-25376 . APACrefDOI ...

    2001 doi

  13. [21]

    \ Russell , C T

    FRu94 APACrefauthors Farris , M H. \ Russell , C T. APACrefauthors \ 1994 09 . Determining the standoff distance of the bow shock: Mach number dependence and use of models Determining the standoff distance of the bow shock: Mach number dependence and use of models . 99 17 . AP...

    1994 doi

  14. [22]

    APACrefauthors \ 1979 12

    For79 APACrefauthors Formisano , V. APACrefauthors \ 1979 12 . The three-dimensional shape of the bow shock The three-dimensional shape of the bow shock . Nuovo Cimento C Geophysics Space Physics C 2 681-692 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/BF02558125 APACrefDOI

    1979 doi

  15. [23]

    , Tokumaru , M

    FuT16 APACrefauthors Fujiki , K. , Tokumaru , M. , Hayashi , K. , Satonaka , D. \ Hakamada , K. APACrefauthors \ 2016 08 . Long-term Trend of Solar Coronal Hole Distribution from 1975 to 2014 Long-term Trend of Solar Coronal Hole Distribution from 1975 to 2014 . 827 L41 . APAC...

    2016 doi

  16. [24]

    \ Hughes , W J

    GHu07 APACrefauthors Garc \' A , K S. \ Hughes , W J. APACrefauthors \ 2007 06 . Finding the Lyon-Fedder-Mobarry magnetopause: A statistical perspective Finding the Lyon-Fedder-Mobarry magnetopause: A statistical perspective . Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) 11...

    2007 doi

  17. [25]

    , Yashiro , S

    GYa16 APACrefauthors Gopalswamy , N. , Yashiro , S. \ Akiyama , S. APACrefauthors \ 2016 05 . Unusual Polar Conditions in Solar Cycle 24 and Their Implications for Cycle 25 Unusual Polar Conditions in Solar Cycle 24 and Their Implications for Cycle 25 . 823 L15 . APACrefDOI do...

    2016 doi

  18. [26]

    , Yashiro , S

    GoY12 APACrefauthors Gopalswamy , N. , Yashiro , S. , M \"a kel \"a , P. , Michalek , G. , Shibasaki , K. \ Hathaway , D H. APACrefauthors \ 2012 05 . Behavior of Solar Cycles 23 and 24 Revealed by Microwave Observations Behavior of Solar Cycles 23 and 24 Revealed by Microwave...

    2012 doi

  19. [27]

    \ Alurkar , S K

    JAl93 APACrefauthors Janardhan , P. \ Alurkar , S K. APACrefauthors \ 1993 03 . Angular source size measurements and interstellar scattering at 103 MHz using interplanetary scintillation Angular source size measurements and interstellar scattering at 103 MHz using interplaneta...

    1993

  20. [28]

    , Bisoi , S K

    JaB11 APACrefauthors Janardhan , P. , Bisoi , S K. , Ananthakrishnan , S. , Tokumaru , M. \ Fujiki , K. APACrefauthors \ 2011 10 . The prelude to the deep minimum between solar cycles 23 and 24: Interplanetary scintillation signatures in the inner heliosphere The prelude to th...

    2011 doi

  21. [29]

    , Bisoi , S K

    JaB15 APACrefauthors Janardhan , P. , Bisoi , S K. , Ananthakrishnan , S. , Tokumaru , M. , Fujiki , K. , Jose , L. \ Sridharan , R. APACrefauthors \ 2015 07 . A 20 year decline in solar photospheric magnetic fields: Inner-heliospheric signatures and possible implications A 20...

    2015 doi

  22. [30]

    , Bisoi , S K

    JBG10 APACrefauthors Janardhan , P. , Bisoi , S K. \ Gosain , S. APACrefauthors \ 2010 12 . Solar Polar Fields During Cycles 21 - 23: Correlation with Meridional Flows Solar Polar Fields During Cycles 21 - 23: Correlation with Meridional Flows . 267 267-277 . APACrefDOI doi:10...

    2010 doi

  23. [31]

    , Fujiki , K

    JaF18 APACrefauthors Janardhan , P. , Fujiki , K. , Ingale , M. , Bisoi , S K. \ Rout , D. APACrefauthors \ 2018 10 . Solar cycle 24: An unusual polar field reversal Solar cycle 24: An unusual polar field reversal . 618 A148 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832981 APACrefDOI

    2018 doi

  24. [32]

    , Fujiki , K

    JaF05 APACrefauthors Janardhan , P. , Fujiki , K. , Kojima , M. , Tokumaru , M. \ Hakamada , K. APACrefauthors \ 2005 08 . Resolving the enigmatic solar wind disappearance event of 11 May 1999 Resolving the enigmatic solar wind disappearance event of 11 May 1999 . 110 8101-+ ....

    2005 doi

  25. [33]

    , Fujiki , K

    JaF08 APACrefauthors Janardhan , P. , Fujiki , K. , Sawant , H S. , Kojima , M. , Hakamada , K. \ Krishnan , R. APACrefauthors \ 2008 03 . Source regions of solar wind disappearance events Source regions of solar wind disappearance events . 113 3102-+ . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/...

    2008 doi

  26. [34]

    , Tripathi , D

    JDM08 APACrefauthors Janardhan , P. , Tripathi , D. \ Mason , H E. APACrefauthors \ 2008 09 . The solar wind disappearance event of 11 May 1999: source region evolution The solar wind disappearance event of 11 May 1999: source region evolution . 488 L1-L4 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1...

    2008 doi

  27. [35]

    , N e me c ek , Z

    JNS12 APACrefauthors Jel \' nek , K. , N e me c ek , Z. \ S afr \'a nkov \'a , J. APACrefauthors \ 2012 05 . A new approach to magnetopause and bow shock modeling based on automated region identification A new approach to magnetopause and bow shock modeling based on automated ...

    2012 doi

  28. [36]

    , Russell , C T

    JRL11 APACrefauthors Jian , L K. , Russell , C T. \ Luhmann , J G. APACrefauthors \ 2011 12 . Comparing Solar Minimum 23/24 with Historical Solar Wind Records at 1 AU Comparing Solar Minimum 23/24 with Historical Solar Wind Records at 1 AU . 274 321-344 . APACrefDOI doi:10.100...

    2011 doi

  29. [37]

    , Zhang , X X

    LiZ10 APACrefauthors Lin , R L. , Zhang , X X. , Liu , S Q. , Wang , Y L. \ Gong , J C. APACrefauthors \ 2010 04 . A three-dimensional asymmetric magnetopause model A three-dimensional asymmetric magnetopause model . Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) 115 A04207 ....

    2010 doi

  30. [38]

    , Liu , Z Q

    LuL11 APACrefauthors Lu , J Y. , Liu , Z Q. , Kabin , K. , Zhao , M X. , Liu , D D. , Zhou , Q. \ Xiao , Y. APACrefauthors \ 2011 09 . Three dimensional shape of the magnetopause: Global MHD results Three dimensional shape of the magnetopause: Global MHD results . Journal of G...

    2011 doi

  31. [39]

    , Angold , N

    McA13 APACrefauthors McComas , D J. , Angold , N. , Elliott , H A. , Livadiotis , G. , Schwadron , N A. , Skoug , R M. \ Smith , C W. APACrefauthors \ 2013 12 . Weakest Solar Wind of the Space Age and the Current ''Mini'' Solar Maximum Weakest Solar Wind of the Space Age and t...

    2013 doi

  32. [40]

    , Elliott , H A

    McE03 APACrefauthors McComas , D J. , Elliott , H A. , Schwadron , N A. , Gosling , J T. , Skoug , R M. \ Goldstein , B E. APACrefauthors \ 2003 05 . The three-dimensional solar wind around solar maximum The three-dimensional solar wind around solar maximum . 30 10 1517 . APAC...

    2003 doi

  33. [41]

    \ Beard , D B

    MBe64 APACrefauthors Mead , G D. \ Beard , D B. APACrefauthors \ 1964 . Shape of the Geomagnetic Field Solar Wind Boundary Shape of the Geomagnetic Field Solar Wind Boundary . 69 1169–1179 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/JZ069i007p01169 APACrefDOI

    1964 doi

  34. [42]

    , Sheeley , N R

    MuS12 APACrefauthors Mu \ n oz-Jaramillo , A. , Sheeley , N R. , Zhang , J. \ DeLuca , E E. APACrefauthors \ 2012 07 . Calibrating 100 Years of Polar Faculae Measurements: Implications for the Evolution of the Heliospheric Magnetic Field Calibrating 100 Years of Polar Faculae ...

    2012 doi

  35. [43]

    \ Safrankova , J

    NSa91 APACrefauthors Nemecek , Z. \ Safrankova , J. APACrefauthors \ 1991 12 . The earth's bow shock and magnetopause position as a result of the solar wind-magnetosphere interaction The earth's bow shock and magnetopause position as a result of the solar wind-magnetosphere in...

    1991 doi

  36. [44]

    APACrefauthors \ 1969

    Ols69 APACrefauthors Olson , W P. APACrefauthors \ 1969 . The shape of the tilted magnetopause The shape of the tilted magnetopause . 74 5642 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/JA074i024p05642 APACrefDOI

    1969 doi

  37. [45]

    , Slavin , J A

    PeS95 APACrefauthors Peredo , M. , Slavin , J A. , Mazur , E. \ Curtis , S A. APACrefauthors \ 1995 05 . Three-dimensional position and shape of the bow shock and their variation with Alfvenic, sonic and magnetosonic Mach numbers and interplanetary magnetic field orientation T...

    1995 doi

  38. [46]

    \ Russell , C T

    PRu96 APACrefauthors Petrinec , S M. \ Russell , C T. APACrefauthors \ 1996 01 . Near-Earth magnetotail shape and size as determined from the magnetopause flaring angle Near-Earth magnetotail shape and size as determined from the magnetopause flaring angle . 101 137-152 . APAC...

    1996 doi

  39. [47]

    \ Hewish , A

    RHe72 APACrefauthors Readhead , A C S. \ Hewish , A. APACrefauthors \ 1972 04 . Galactic Structure and the Apparent Size of Radio Sources Galactic Structure and the Apparent Size of Radio Sources . 236 440-443 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1038/236440a0 APACrefDOI

    1972 doi

  40. [48]

    , Wang , C

    RWP01 APACrefauthors Richardson , J D. , Wang , C. \ Paularena , K I. APACrefauthors \ 2001 . The solar wind: from solar minimum to solar maximum The solar wind: from solar minimum to solar maximum . Advances in Space Research 27 471-479 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1016/S0273-1177(01)...

    2001 doi

  41. [49]

    , Lionello , R

    RiL15 APACrefauthors Riley , P. , Lionello , R. , Linker , J A. , Cliver , E. , Balogh , A. , Beer , J. Koutchmy , S. APACrefauthors \ 2015 04 . Inferring the Structure of the Solar Corona and Inner Heliosphere During the Maunder Minimum Using Global Thermodynamic Magnetohydro...

    2015 doi

  42. [50]

    , Bogdanova, Y V

    SaB19 APACrefauthors Samsonov, A A. , Bogdanova, Y V. , Branduardi-Raymont, G. , Safrankova, J. , Nemecek, Z. \ Park, J S. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Long-Term Variations in Solar Wind Parameters, Magnetopause Location, and Geomagnetic Activity Over the Last Five Solar Cycles Lon...

    2019 doi

  43. [51]

    APACrefauthors \ 2016 07

    San16 APACrefauthors S \'a nchez-Sesma , J. APACrefauthors \ 2016 07 . Evidence of cosmic recurrent and lagged millennia-scale patterns and consequent forecasts: multi-scale responses of solar activity (SA) to planetary gravitational forcing (PGF) Evidence of cosmic recurrent ...

    2016 doi

  44. [52]

    \ Pesnell , W D

    SPe93 APACrefauthors Schatten , K H. \ Pesnell , W D. APACrefauthors \ 1993 10 . An early solar dynamo prediction: Cycle 23 is approximately cycle 22 An early solar dynamo prediction: Cycle 23 is approximately cycle 22 . 20 2275-2278 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/93GL02431 APACrefDOI

    1993 doi

  45. [53]

    , Chao , J K

    ShC97 APACrefauthors Shue , J H. , Chao , J K. , Fu , H C. , Russell , C T. , Song , P. , Khurana , K K. \ Singer , H J. APACrefauthors \ 1997 05 . A new functional form to study the solar wind control of the magnetopause size and shape A new functional form to study the solar...

    1997 doi

  46. [54]

    , Song , P

    ShS98 APACrefauthors Shue , J H. , Song , P. , Russell , C T. , Steinberg , J T. , Chao , J K. , Zastenker , G. Kawano , H. APACrefauthors \ 1998 08 . Magnetopause location under extreme solar wind conditions Magnetopause location under extreme solar wind conditions . 103 1769...

    1998 doi

  47. [55]

    \ Gordeev, E

    SGo15 APACrefauthors Shukhtina, M A. \ Gordeev, E. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . In situ magnetotail magnetic flux calculation In situ magnetotail magnetic flux calculation . Annales Geophysicae 33 6 769-781 . APACrefURL http://www.ann-geophys.net/33/769/2015/ APACrefURL APACrefDOI ...

    2015 doi

  48. [56]

    , Lopez , R E

    SLR91 APACrefauthors Sibeck , D G. , Lopez , R E. \ Roelof , E C. APACrefauthors \ 1991 04 . Solar wind control of the magnetopause shape, location, and motion Solar wind control of the magnetopause shape, location, and motion . 96 5489-5495 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/90JA02464 ...

    1991 doi

  49. [57]

    \ Briggs , B R

    SBr62 APACrefauthors Spreiter , J R. \ Briggs , B R. APACrefauthors \ 1962 01 . Theoretical Determination of the Form of the Boundary of the Solar Corpuscular Strea Produced by Interaction with the Magnetic Dipole Field of the Earth Theoretical Determination of the Form of the...

    1962 doi

  50. [58]

    , Hoeksema , J T

    SuH15 APACrefauthors Sun , X. , Hoeksema , J T. , Liu , Y. \ Zhao , J. APACrefauthors \ 2015 01 . On Polar Magnetic Field Reversal and Surface Flux Transport During Solar Cycle 24 On Polar Magnetic Field Reversal and Surface Flux Transport During Solar Cycle 24 . 798 114 . APA...

    2015 doi

  51. [59]

    , Sokolov , I V

    ToS05 APACrefauthors T \'o th , G. , Sokolov , I V. , Gombosi , T I. , Chesney , D R. , Clauer , C R. , De Zeeuw , D L. K \'o ta , J. APACrefauthors \ 2005 12 . Space Weather Modeling Framework: A new tool for the space science community Space Weather Modeling Framework: A new...

    2005 doi

  52. [60]

    \ Hathaway , D H

    UHa18 APACrefauthors Upton , L A. \ Hathaway , D H. APACrefauthors \ 2018 08 . An Updated Solar Cycle 25 Prediction With AFT: The Modern Minimum An Updated Solar Cycle 25 Prediction With AFT: The Modern Minimum . 45 8091-8095 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/2018GL078387 APACrefDOI

    2018 doi

  53. [61]

    , Sibeck , D G

    WaS13 APACrefauthors Wang , Y. , Sibeck , D G. , Merka , J. , Boardsen , S A. , Karimabadi , H. , Sipes , T B. Lin , R. APACrefauthors \ 2013 05 . A new three-dimensional magnetopause model with a support vector regression machine and a large database of multiple spacecraft ob...

    2013

  54. [62]

    , Chao , J K

    YaC03 APACrefauthors Yang , Y H. , Chao , J K. , Dmitriev , A V. , Lin , C H. \ Ober , D M. APACrefauthors \ 2003 03 . Saturation of IMF B _ z influence on the position of dayside magnetopause Saturation of IMF B _ z influence on the position of dayside magnetopause . Journal ...

    2003 doi

  55. [63]

    \ Gkana , A

    ZGk15 APACrefauthors Zachilas , L. \ Gkana , A. APACrefauthors \ 2015 05 . On the Verge of a Grand Solar Minimum: A Second Maunder Minimum? On the Verge of a Grand Solar Minimum: A Second Maunder Minimum? 290 1457-1477 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/s11207-015-0684-1 APACrefDOI

    2015 doi

  56. [64]

    \ Romishevskii , E A

    ZRo59 APACrefauthors Zhigulevsk , V N. \ Romishevskii , E A. APACrefauthors \ 1959 . Soviet Phys. Doklady 5 1001-1004

    1959

  57. [65]

    , Wan , W X

    ZhW14 APACrefauthors Zhong , J. , Wan , W X. , Wei , Y. , Fu , S Y. , Jiao , W X. , Rong , Z J. Han , X H. APACrefauthors \ 2014 12 . Increasing exposure of geosynchronous orbit in solar wind due to decay of Earth's dipole field Increasing exposure of geosynchronous orbit in s...

    2014 doi

  58. [66]

    \ Ponyavin , D I

    ZPo14 APACrefauthors Zolotova , N V. \ Ponyavin , D I. APACrefauthors \ 2014 05 . Is the new Grand minimum in progress? Is the new Grand minimum in progress? Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) 119 3281-3285 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1002/2013JA019751 APACrefDOI

    2014 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.