Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 50 references

Electronic specific heat coefficient and magnetic properties of Y(Fe$_{1-x}$Co$_x$)$_2$ Laves phases: a combined experimental and first-principles study

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The maximum in the electronic specific-heat coefficient of Y(Fe,Co)2 Laves phases is traced to a sharp density-of-states peak crossing the Fermi level as cobalt concentration changes.

desk verdict Solid combined experimental/DFT study of the gamma(x) maximum in Y(FeCo)2; the DOS-peak explanation is plausible but the coincidence of the measured peak with the calculated magnetic transition leaves spin fluctuations unresolved. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02649 v2 pith:6MSLTZFQ submitted 2019-08-07 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Bartosz Wasilewski , Zbigniew Śniadecki , Miros{l}aw Werwiński , Natalia Pierunek , Ján Rusz , Olle Eriksson This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords LavesphaseselectronicspecificheatcoefficientSommerfelddensityofstatesattheFermilevelvirtualcrystalapproximationitinerantmagnetismY(FeCo)2ferromagnetic-paramagnetictransition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that the measured maximum in the electronic specific-heat coefficient $\gamma(x)$ (the linear-$T$ electronic term) of the intermetallic Laves-phase alloys Y(Fe$_{1-x}$Co$_x$)$_2$ has a band-structure origin. Within the local-density approximation combined with the virtual crystal approximation, the calculated $\gamma(x)$ peaks at $x_{\mathrm{max}}=0.91$, in good agreement with the measured value $x_{\mathrm{max-expt}}\approx 0.925$. The authors trace this maximum to a sharp density-of-states peak that lies about 0.1 eV below the Fermi level in YCo$_2$; as cobalt concentration changes, the Fermi level sweeps across this peak, and on the ferromagnetic side the minority-spin peak sits at the Fermi level. The result matters because it converts an anomalous thermodynamic peak near a magnetic phase transition into a specific, testable electronic-structure mechanism.

What carries the argument

The moving object is a narrow, sharp DOS peak located about 0.1 eV below $E_F$ in YCo$_2$; its position relative to the Fermi level is the variable that controls $\gamma$. In the LDA-VCA picture, decreasing cobalt concentration depopulates the valence band and moves $E_F$ toward the centre of the peak, while below the critical concentration exchange splitting separates the spin channels and leaves the minority-spin component on $E_F$. Two auxiliary tools support the interpretation: fixed-spin-moment (FSM) calculations, which map magnetic energy and DOS($E_F$) as functions of a constrained moment and show that ground-state moments sit at DOS($E_F$) maxima, and Fermi-surface calculations, which show the evolution of the sheets as the peak is scanned. The coherent potential approximation (CPA) is used as a cross-check and produces a smoother $\gamma(x)$ maximum because chemical disorder broadens the sharp peak.

What would settle it

Measure the band structure of Y(Fe$_{1-x}$Co$_x$)$_2$ with angle-resolved photoemission for $x$ between 0.85 and 1.0: the mechanism predicts a sharp band crossing the electron-occupation level at $x\approx0.91$–0.925, whereas a broadened or absent crossing would support the disorder-broadening alternative. A complementary bulk test is to compare $\gamma(x)$ on rapidly quenched and annealed samples; if disorder-induced magnetic clusters are responsible for the extra specific heat above $x_{\mathrm{crit}}$, annealing should change the peak, while the intrinsic DOS-peak mechanism should leave it largely intact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the concentration-induced maximum of $\gamma$ in the Co-rich region is caused by a sharp peak in the density of states (DOS) near the Fermi level, not primarily by spin fluctuations or many-body renormalization. The paper supports this with LDA-VCA calculations: computing $\gamma$ from DOS($E_F$) and applying a single enhancement factor $\tilde{\gamma}=6.87$ gives a maximum at $x=0.91$, close to the measured maximum of $62.8$ mJ mol$^{-1}$ K$^{-2}$ at $x=0.925$. In the nonmagnetic range the Fermi level scans the sharp peak, while in the ferromagnetic range exchange splitting pushes the minority-spin peak to the Fermi level, increasing DOS($E_F$). Fixed-spin-moment calculations reinforce the argument by showing that the minima of magnetic energy correspond to the highest ground-state DOS($E_F$), and Fermi-surface plots show the largest surface area at the same concentration. The authors conclude that the maximum in $\gamma(x)$ results from this sharp DOS peak crossing the Fermi level.

Load-bearing premise

The whole explanation depends on the assumption that replacing the random mixture of iron and cobalt atoms by a smooth averaged crystal still puts the narrow band of electron states at the correct energy relative to the electron-occupation level as the composition changes; if the real atomic disorder broadens or moves that band, the predicted location of the maximum is an artifact.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The maximum in $\gamma(x)$ is not primarily a spin-fluctuation anomaly; a one-electron band-structure calculation already places it at the observed concentration.
  • Any substitution or pressure that shifts the Fermi level relative to the sharp YCo$_2$ peak should move the $\gamma$ maximum in a predictable direction.
  • The single enhancement factor $\tilde{\gamma}=6.87$ suffices to bring the calculated $\gamma$ close to experiment, implying the many-body correction is roughly concentration-independent across the Co-rich range.
  • The same scanning-peak mechanism should produce a similar specific-heat maximum in other Co-based Laves phases with a comparable DOS peak near $E_F$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the sharp peak is artificially sharp in the VCA, a real disordered alloy may show a broader, slightly shifted maximum; the paper's own CPA result already hints at this, so the precise $x_{\mathrm{max}}=0.91$ should be read as a clean-limit prediction rather than a precision statement for disordered samples.
  • The larger separation between $x_{\mathrm{max}}$ and $x_{\mathrm{crit}}$ noted for the Zr(Fe,Co)$_2$ analogue suggests the same Fermi-level-scanning picture could be tested there, where the peak-crossing concentration and the magnetic transition are more widely spaced.
  • Because the paper attributes low-temperature upturns in $C_p/T$ above $x_{\mathrm{crit}}$ to magnetic clusters, a comparison of rapidly quenched and annealed samples could separate the intrinsic DOS-peak contribution to $\gamma$ from the disorder-driven cluster contribution.
  • Fixed-spin-moment curves suggest that applying hydrostatic pressure or epitaxial strain, which moves both the Fermi level and the peak, could tune the specific-heat maximum without changing composition; this is a testable prediction the paper does not make.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper reports low-temperature specific-heat measurements on melt-spun Y(Fe1-xCox)2 for x = 0.85, 0.90, 0.925, 0.95, and 0.985, combined with first-principles LDA calculations using the virtual crystal approximation (VCA), the coherent potential approximation (CPA), and ordered-compound models. The measured electronic specific-heat coefficient gamma(x) shows a broad maximum of 62.8 mJ mol^-1 K^-2 near x = 0.925, close to the ferromagnetic-paramagnetic transition. The calculated LDA-VCA DOS at the Fermi level, multiplied by a literature enhancement factor of 6.87, gives a maximum at xmax-LDA-VCA = 0.91, which the authors interpret as support for their conclusion that the observed gamma maximum arises from a sharp DOS peak near the Fermi level. The paper also presents fixed-spin-moment calculations, Fermi-surface evolution, and CPA/ordered-compound magnetic moments for the full concentration range.

Significance. If the DOS-peak interpretation is correct, the paper provides a concrete one-electron mechanism for a long-standing anomaly in the specific heat of Y(Fe,Co)2 Laves phases, and it offers several falsifiable predictions: the evolution of the Fermi surface, the critical concentration xcrit ~ 0.925, and the fixed-spin-moment energy surfaces. The experimental measurements are standard and are reported with uncertainties, and the calculations are transparent: the peak position in gamma(x) is not a fitted quantity, because the only external parameter is the x-independent enhancement factor taken from Tanaka and Harima. The paper is also commendable for explicitly acknowledging its limitations, including VCA sharpness, LDA overbinding, and the neglect of spin fluctuations, and for cross-checking magnetic moments with CPA and ordered compounds. The main weakness is that the causal attribution of the measured maximum remains underdetermined, as discussed below.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.B.1 and Sec. IV] The central claim that the observed gamma(x) maximum 'results from' the sharp DOS peak is not uniquely supported by the evidence presented. The measured maximum is at xmax-expt = 0.925, which coincides with the experimental and calculated critical concentration xcrit ~ 0.925, whereas the calculated DOS-peak maximum is at xmax-LDA-VCA = 0.91. The authors themselves state that the measurements are not accurate enough to confirm this offset. Because the enhancement factor 6.87 is x-independent and spin fluctuations are not included in the calculation, a spin-fluctuation mass enhancement centered at the magnetic transition would also produce a gamma maximum at x ~ 0.925. To make the causal claim load-bearing, the authors should either provide a quantitative estimate of the spin-fluctuation contribution (for example, through a self-consistent renormalization treatment or a comparison with field-dependent specific heat) or soften the conclusion to say that the measured maximum is 'consistent with' the DOS-peak mechanism rather than uniquely 'resulting from' it.
  2. [Sec. II and Sec. III.B.1, Fig. 5] The comparison shown in Fig. 5 uses a single enhancement factor of 6.87 derived for YCo2. This factor is not fitted to the present data, which correctly avoids circularity in the peak position, but it implicitly assumes the same many-body renormalization at every concentration and cannot describe any concentration-dependent enhancement near the transition. Consequently, the shape of gamma_calc-enh(x) in Fig. 5 is entirely inherited from the bare LDA DOS(EF)(x), and the agreement in peak position is a statement about the one-electron density of states, not about the measured quasiparticle mass. This distinction should be stated explicitly, and the authors should not use the overall scale or the closeness of gamma_max-enh to gamma_max-expt as evidence for the physical mechanism.
  3. [Sec. III.B.1 (Fig. 4) and Sec. III.B.4] The quantitative prediction xmax-LDA-VCA = 0.91 rests on LDA lattice parameters linearly interpolated between 7.05 A (YFe2) and 6.95 A (YCo2) and on the VCA, which the authors acknowledge lacks chemical-disorder broadening. The paper also reports that the CPA calculation gives a smoother gamma(x) maximum, so the precise value 0.91 and especially its offset from xcrit ~ 0.925 may be artifacts of the VCA rather than a robust physical prediction. This does not invalidate the existence of a DOS-related peak, but it weakens the quantitative comparison with xmax-expt. The authors should either display the CPA gamma(x) curve together with the VCA curve in Fig. 5 or provide a clear estimate of the uncertainty in xmax arising from the different disorder treatments.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II, after Eq. (2)] The word 'obtainded' should be 'obtained'.
  2. [Sec. III.A and Fig. 5] The units mJ mol^-1 K^-2 are used without specifying whether 'mol' refers to one mole of formula units or one mole of atoms; the text and Table II should be made internally consistent.
  3. [Sec. III.B.3] The sentence 'One of them is nested and thus not visible in the figure' should be clarified, because a nested Fermi-surface sheet is not necessarily invisible; the authors likely mean that it is hidden by other sheets or has zero area in the plotted representation.
  4. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption would be clearer if the two columns were explicitly labeled 'FM' and 'NM' and if the solid/dashed line convention were described as majority- and minority-spin channels rather than only as 'spin'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the predicted gamma(x) maximum is a direct DFT output, and the uniform enhancement factor cannot create it.

full rationale

The paper's central prediction is the Co concentration xmax where gamma(x) peaks. That location is determined by the LDA-VCA density of states at the Fermi level as a function of x, computed from first principles with fixed stoichiometry, optimized lattice parameters, and linear interpolation between the endpoints. The measured gamma values are not used in the calculation, and no parameter is fitted to the measured gamma(x) curve. The only calibrated input is the enhancement factor gamma-tilde = 6.87 taken from Tanaka and Harima for YCo2; because it is a single x-independent multiplier, it scales all gamma values uniformly and cannot shift or create the maximum in x. Thus Eq. (1) plus the DOS(EF)(x) calculation is not equivalent by construction to the experimental maximum. The self-citations in the paper are to previous structural, magnetic, and computational studies of the same materials family; they supply method provenance and background facts, not a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or the gamma-maximum result. The skeptical concern that the measured maximum may be caused by spin fluctuations at the magnetic transition, rather than by the one-electron DOS peak, is a scientific alternative explanation and a correctness risk; it is not a circularity because the paper's own equations do not reduce the predicted xmax to the measured gamma(x). The paper even acknowledges the offset between xmax-LDA-VCA = 0.91 and xcrit = 0.925, showing that the calculation is not forced to match the measurement. All main quantitative claims stand on independent DFT output compared with new experimental data, so no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is built on standard electronic structure theory plus one external fitted enhancement factor and an interpolation for lattice parameters. No new physical entities are introduced. The enhancement factor is the only fitted quantity, and it is uniform across x, so it cannot create the concentration-dependent maximum.

free parameters (3)
  • Enhancement factor (gamma_tilde) = 6.87
    Taken from Tanaka and Harima (1998), who adjusted it so the LDA gamma of YCo2 matches experiment (Udd=1.8 eV). Applied uniformly to all compositions to rescale gamma values; it does not affect the position of the maximum.
  • Coulomb interaction Udd = 1.8 eV
    Parameter in the external Tanaka-Harima model used to derive gamma_tilde; inherited here as an input rather than fitted in this paper.
  • Lattice parameters a(x) = Linear interpolation between 7.05 A (YFe2) and 6.95 A (YCo2)
    Intermediate concentrations use linearly interpolated LDA-optimized lattice parameters rather than relaxed values, stated in Section II. This affects densities of states and magnetic moments.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption LSDA (PW92) describes the relative electronic structure and DOS near the Fermi level well enough to track the gamma(x) maximum.
    All DFT results use this functional; the paper notes LDA underestimates lattice parameters and magnetic moments and that GGA fails to give the transition, so LSDA is load-bearing.
  • domain assumption The virtual crystal approximation is a valid representation of chemical disorder for the concentration dependence of gamma near x=0.9.
    VCA is chosen in Sections II and III despite known neglect of disorder broadening; the authors state CPA gives a smoother maximum, indicating VCA sharpness may be partly artificial.
  • standard math The Sommerfeld relation gamma = (1/3) pi^2 kB^2 DOS(EF) holds for these alloys.
    Eq. 1, a standard free-electron/Fermi liquid result.
  • domain assumption Scalar-relativistic approximation (no spin-orbit coupling) is adequate.
    Used for consistency with CPA calculations, stated in Section II; assumed not to shift the gamma(x) maximum materially.
  • domain assumption Fixed spin moment calculations constrain the total moment and provide meaningful DOS(EF)(m) curves.
    Section III.B.2; a standard DFT technique used to interpret the maximum, assuming constrained moment states are representative.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electronic specific heat coefficient and magnetic properties of Y(Fe$_{1-x}$Co$_x$)$_2$ Laves phases: a combined experimental and first-principles study." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6MSLTZFQ

@misc{pith2026190802649,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electronic specific heat coefficient and magnetic properties of Y(Fe$_1-x$Co$_x$)$_2$ Laves phases: a combined experimental and first-principles study},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6MSLTZFQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02649}
}
abstract

We investigated experimentally and computationally the concentration dependence of electronic specific heat coefficient $\gamma$ in Y(Fe$_{1-x}$Co$_x$)$_2$ pseudobinary Laves phase system. The experimentally observed maximum in $\gamma$($x$) around the magnetic phase transition was interpreted within the local density approximation (LDA) combined with the virtual crystal approximation (VCA). To explain the formation of the observed maximum, we analyzed theoretically the dependence of the magnetic energy, magnetic moments, densities of states, and Fermi surfaces on the Co concentration. Furthermore, we carried out the calculations of density of states at the Fermi level as a function of fixed spin moment. The calculated Co concentration at which $\gamma$ takes the maximum value ($x_{\mathrm{max-LDA-VCA}}=0.91$) stays in good agreement with the measured value ($x_{\mathrm{max-expt}} = 0.925$). We conclude that the observed maximum in $\gamma(x)$ results from the presence of the sharp DOS peak in the vicinity of the Fermi level.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.02649 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Crystal structure of the cubic MgCu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The experimental electronic specific heat coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. To analyze the formation of maximum in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The calculated (with LDA-VCA) en [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The calculated (with LDA-VCA method) mag [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The spin magnetic moments [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author F Stein , author M Palm , \ and\ author G Sauthoff ,\ title title Structure and stability of Laves phases. Part I . Critical assessment of factors controlling Laves phase stability , \ 10.1016/j.intermet.2004.02.010 journal journal Intermetallics \ volume 12 ,\ pages 713--720 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2004.02.010 2004

  2. [2]

    author author Adil \ Murtaza , author Sen \ Yang , author Tieyan \ Chang , author Awais \ Ghani , author Muhammad Tahir \ Khan , author Rui \ Zhang , author Chao \ Zhou , author Xiaoping \ Song , author Matthew \ Suchomel , \ and\ author Yang \ Ren ,\ title title Spin reorientation and magnetoelastic properties of ferromagnetic Tb 1-x Nd x Co 2 systems wi...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.104410

  3. [3]

    author author Hongbo \ Xie , author Hucheng \ Pan , author Yuping \ Ren , author Liqing \ Wang , author Yufeng \ He , author Xixi \ Qi , \ and\ author Gaowu \ Qin ,\ title title New Structured Laves Phase in the Mg - In - Ca System with Nontranslational Symmetry and Two Unit Cells , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.085701 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volum...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.085701

  4. [4]

    Yan , author Xing-Qiu \ Chen , author H

    author author X. Yan , author Xing-Qiu \ Chen , author H. Michor , author W. Wolf , author V. T. \ Witusiewicz , author E. Bauer , author R. Podloucky , \ and\ author P. Rogl ,\ title title Structural, thermodynamic, and electronic properties of Laves -phase NbMn 2 from first principles, x-ray diffraction, and calorimetric experiments , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.125110

  5. [5]

    Steiner \ and\ author H

    author author W. Steiner \ and\ author H. Ortbauer ,\ title title Magnetische Messungen an Y ( Fe x Co 1-x ) 2 im Bereich kleiner Fe - Konzentrationen , \ 10.1002/pssa.2210260207 journal journal phys. stat. sol. (a) \ volume 26 ,\ pages 451--457 ( year 1974 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1002/pssa.2210260207

  6. [6]

    author author A. R. \ Piercy \ and\ author K. N. R. \ Taylor ,\ title title Evidence for an itinerant electron moment in cubic Laves -phase rare-earth - transition-metal compounds , \ 10.1088/0022-3719/1/4/330 journal journal J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. \ volume 1 ,\ pages 1112 ( year 1968 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3719/1/4/330

  7. [7]

    Guzdek , author J

    author author P. Guzdek , author J. Pszczo a , author J. Chmist , author P. Stoch , author A. Stoch , \ and\ author J. Suwalski ,\ title title Electrical resistivity and M \"o ssbauer effect studies of Y ( Fe 1-x Co x ) 2 intermetallics , \ 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.12.081 journal journal J. Alloys Compd. \ volume 520 ,\ pages 72--76 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.12.081

  8. [8]

    author author Yoshihiro \ Yamada \ and\ author Hideo \ Ohmae ,\ title title NMR Study of Y ( Fe 1-x Co x ) 2 and Zr ( Fe 1-x Co x ) 2 , \ 10.1143/JPSJ.48.1513 journal journal J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. \ volume 48 ,\ pages 1513--1518 ( year 1980 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.48.1513

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Schwarz \ and\ author P

    author author K. Schwarz \ and\ author P. Mohn ,\ title title Itinerant metamagnetism in YCo 2 , \ 10.1088/0305-4608/14/7/008 journal journal J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. \ volume 14 ,\ pages L129 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

    1984 doi

  2. [10]

    Goto , author T

    author author T. Goto , author T. Sakakibara , author K. Murata , author H. Komatsu , \ and\ author K. Fukamichi ,\ title title Itinerant electron metamagnetism in YCo 2 and LuCo 2 , \ 10.1016/S0304-8853(10)80256-2 journal journal J. Magn. Magn. Mater. \ volume 90-91 ,\ pages ...

    doi

  3. [11]

    author author S. H. \ Kilcoyne ,\ title title The evolution of magnetic correlations and onset of magnetic order in Y ( Co 1-x Fe x ) 2 , \ 10.1016/S0921-4526(99)01731-7 journal journal Phys. B Condens. Matter \ volume 276 278 ,\ pages 660--661 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    doi

  4. [12]

    Balamurugan , author R

    author author B. Balamurugan , author R. Skomski , author X. Z. \ Li , author V. R. \ Shah , author G. C. \ Hadjipanayis , author J. E. \ Shield , \ and\ author D. J. \ Sellmyer ,\ title title Magnetism of cluster-deposited Y Co nanoparticles , \ 10.1063/1.3549602 journal jour...

    doi

  5. [13]

    \ Pecharsky , author Karl A

    author author Claudia Marcela \ Bonilla , author Durga \ Paudyal , author Julia \ Herrero-Albillos , author Vitalij K. \ Pecharsky , author Karl A. \ Gschneidner , author Luis Miguel \ Garcia , \ and\ author Fernando \ Bartolome ,\ title title Formation of Co Moment in the Par...

  6. [14]

    Phys.: Condens

    author author P Kumar , author A Kashyap , author B Balamurugan , author J E \ Shield , author D J \ Sellmyer , \ and\ author R Skomski ,\ title title Permanent magnetism of intermetallic compounds between light and heavy transition-metal elements , \ 10.1088/0953-8984/26/6/06...

    doi

  7. [15]

    Paul-Boncour , author O

    author author V. Paul-Boncour , author O. Isnard , author M. Guillot , \ and\ author A. Hoser ,\ title title Metamagnetic transitions in Y 0.5 Er 0.5 Fe 2 D 4.2 deuteride studied by high magnetic field and neutron diffraction experiments , \ 10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.01.056 journal ...

    doi

  8. [16]

    Isnard , author V

    author author O. Isnard , author V. Paul-Boncour , author Z. Arnold , author C. V. \ Colin , author T. Leblond , author J. Kamarad , \ and\ author H. Sugiura ,\ title title Pressure-induced changes in the structural and magnetic properties of YFe 2 D 4.2 , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.8...

    doi

  9. [17]

    Isnard , author V

    author author O. Isnard , author V. Paul-Boncour , \ and\ author Z. Arnold ,\ title title On the origin of the giant isotopic effect of hydrogen on the magnetic properties of YFe 2 A 4.2 ( A = H , D ): A high pressure study , \ 10.1063/1.4798260 journal journal Appl. Phys. Let...

    doi

  10. [18]

    Alloys Compd

    author author Ziming \ Li , author Hui \ Wang , author Liuzhang \ Ouyang , author Jiangwen \ Liu , \ and\ author Min \ Zhu ,\ title title Reversible hydriding in YFe 2-x Al x (x = 0.3, 0.5, 0.7) intermetallic compounds , \ 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.003 journal journal J. Alloy...

    doi

  11. [19]

    Paul-Boncour , author M

    author author V. Paul-Boncour , author M. Guillot , author O. Isnard , \ and\ author A. Hoser ,\ title title High field induced magnetic transitions in the Y 0.7 Er 0.3 Fe 2 D 4.2 deuteride , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.104440 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 96 ,\ pages 104440...

    doi

  12. [20]

    author author G. B. G. \ Stenning , author G. J. \ Bowden , author P. A. J. \ de Groot , author G. van der Laan , author A. I. \ Figueroa , author P. Bencok , author P. Steadman , \ and\ author T. Hesjedal ,\ title title Exchange spring switching in Er -doped DyFe 2 / YFe 2 ma...

    doi

  13. [21]

    Fu , author B

    author author X. Fu , author B. Warot-Fonrose , author R. Arras , author K. Dumesnil , \ and\ author V. Serin ,\ title title Quantitative moment study and coupling of 4f rare earth and 3d metal by transmitted electrons , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.140416 journal journal Phys. Rev. ...

    doi

  14. [22]

    author author N. V. \ Baranov , author A. V. \ Proshkin , author C. Czternasty , author M. Mei ner , author A. Podlesnyak , \ and\ author S. M. \ Podgornykh ,\ title title Butterflylike specific heat, magnetocaloric effect, and itinerant metamagnetism in ( Er , Y ) Co 2 compou...

    doi

  15. [23]

    Alloys Compd

    author author Natalia \ Pierunek , author Zbigniew \ \'S niadecki , author Miros aw \ Werwi \'n ski , author Bartosz \ Wasilewski , author Victorino \ Franco , \ and\ author Bogdan \ Idzikowski ,\ title title Normal and inverse magnetocaloric effects in structurally disordered...

    doi

  16. [24]

    Eriksson , author B

    author author O. Eriksson , author B. Johansson , \ and\ author M. S. S. \ Brooks ,\ title title Electronic structure and magnetic properties of the Y ( Fe 1-x Co x ) 2 alloys , \ 10.1051/jphyscol:19888132 journal journal J. Phys. Colloques \ volume 49 ,\ pages C8--295 ( year ...

    doi

  17. [25]

    author author Olle \ Eriksson , author B \"o rje \ Johansson , author M. S. S. \ Brooks , \ and\ author H. L. \ Skriver ,\ title title Electronic structure and magnetic properties of selected lanthanide and actinide intermetallic Laves -phase alloys , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.40.951...

    doi

  18. [26]

    author author Martin \ Divi s , author J \'a n \ Rusz , \ and\ author Manuel \ Richter ,\ title title Electronic Structure of RCo 2 ( R = Y , Nd , Ho , Er ) , \ 10.1023/A:1014436116284 journal journal Czech. J. Phys. \ volume 52 ,\ pages 247--252 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    doi

  19. [27]

    author author J \'a n \ Rusz , author Martin \ Divi s , \ and\ author Vladim \'r \ Sechovsk \'y ,\ title title Magnetism in RECo 2 compounds under pressure , \ 10.1016/j.jmmm.2003.12.609 journal journal J. Magn. Magn. Mater. \ volume 272-276 ,\ pages E383--E385 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2003 doi

  20. [28]

    \'S niadecki , author M

    author author Z. \'S niadecki , author M. Werwi \'n ski , author A. Szajek , author U. K. \ R \"o ler , \ and\ author B. Idzikowski ,\ title title Induced magnetic ordering in alloyed compounds based on Pauli paramagnet YCo 2 , \ 10.1063/1.4866848 journal journal J. Appl. Phys...

    doi

  21. [29]

    \'S niadecki , author M

    author author Z. \'S niadecki , author M. Kopcewicz , author N. Pierunek , \ and\ author B. Idzikowski ,\ title title Magnetic percolation and inequivalence of Fe sites in YFe x Co 2-x (x = 0.03 and 1) Laves phase compounds , \ 10.1007/s00339-014-8829-x journal journal Appl. P...

    doi

  22. [30]

    author author Bartosz \ Wasilewski , author Wojciech \ Marciniak , \ and\ author Miros aw \ Werwi \'n ski ,\ title title Curie temperature study of Y ( Fe 1-x Co x ) 2 and Zr ( Fe 1-x Co x ) 2 systems using mean field theory and Monte Carlo method , \ 10.1088/1361-6463/aab75b ...

    doi

  23. [31]

    \'S niadecki , author N

    author author Z. \'S niadecki , author N. Pierunek , author B. Idzikowski , author B. Wasilewski , author M. Werwi \'n ski , author U. K. \ R \"o ler , \ and\ author Yu. \ Ivanisenko ,\ title title Influence of structural disorder on the magnetic properties and electronic stru...

    doi

  24. [32]

    author author Klaus \ Koepernik , author B. Velick \'y , author Roland \ Hayn , \ and\ author Helmut \ Eschrig ,\ title title Self-consistent LCAO - CPA method for disordered alloys , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.5717 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 55 ,\ pages 5717--5729 ( yea...

    doi

  25. [33]

    author author Paul \ Soven ,\ title title Application of the coherent potential approximation to a system of muffin-tin potentials , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.2.4715 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 2 ,\ pages 4715 ( year 1970 ) NoStop

    1970 doi

  26. [34]

    author author Klaus \ Koepernik \ and\ author Helmut \ Eschrig ,\ title title Full-potential nonorthogonal local-orbital minimum-basis band-structure scheme , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1743 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 59 ,\ pages 1743--1757 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    doi

  27. [35]

    author author John P. \ Perdew \ and\ author Yue \ Wang ,\ title title Accurate and simple analytic representation of the electron-gas correlation energy , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.13244 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 45 ,\ pages 13244--13249 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    doi

  28. [36]

    Khmelevskyi , author P

    author author S. Khmelevskyi , author P. Mohn , author J. Redinger , \ and\ author M. Weinert ,\ title title Magnetism on the Surface of the Bulk Paramagnetic Intermetallic Compound YCo 2 , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.146403 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 94 ,\ pages 1...

    doi

  29. [37]

    author author Wenxu \ Zhang \ and\ author Wanli \ Zhang ,\ title title Collapse of the magnetic moment under pressure of AFe2 ( A = Y , Zr , Lu and Hf ) in the cubic Laves phase , \ 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.12.026 journal journal J. Magn. Magn. Mater. \ volume 404 ,\ pages 83--90 (...

    2015 doi

  30. [38]

    author author Koichi \ Momma \ and\ author Fujio \ Izumi ,\ title title VESTA : A three-dimensional visualization system for electronic and structural analysis , \ 10.1107/S0021889808012016 journal journal J. Appl. Crystallogr. \ volume 41 ,\ pages 653--658 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    doi

  31. [39]

    author author Shingo \ Tanaka \ and\ author Hisatomo \ Harima ,\ title title Mass Enhancement Factor and Fermi Surface in YCo 2 , \ 10.1143/JPSJ.67.2594 journal journal J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. \ volume 67 ,\ pages 2594--2597 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    doi

  32. [40]

    author author Shingo \ Tanaka , author Hisatomo \ Harima , \ and\ author Akira \ Yanase ,\ title title Calculations of Fermi Surfaces and Enhanced Electronic Specific - Heat Coefficients in Cubic Laves - Phase Ce Compounds , \ 10.1143/JPSJ.67.1342 journal journal J. Phys. Soc....

    doi

  33. [41]

    author author Yoshitoshi \ Muraoka , author Masayuki \ Shiga , \ and\ author Yoji \ Nakamura ,\ title title Electronic Specific Heat of Y ( Fe 1-x Co x ) 2 , \ 10.1143/JPSJ.42.2067 journal journal J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. \ volume 42 ,\ pages 2067--2068 ( year 1977 ) NoStop

    doi

  34. [42]

    author author N. V. \ Baranov , author A. A. \ Yermakov , \ and\ author A. Podlesnyak ,\ title title Onset of magnetism in Y 1- x Gd x Co 2 : Effect on the heat capacity and electrical resistivity , \ 10.1088/0953-8984/15/31/304 journal journal J. Phys.: Condens. Matter \ volu...

    doi

  35. [43]

    author author Walter \ Steiner ,\ title title Magnetization processes caused by iron substitution in cubic laves phases , \ 10.1016/0304-8853(79)90202-6 journal journal J. Magn. Magn. Mater. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 47--79 ( year 1979 ) NoStop

    doi

  36. [44]

    author author Kiyosi \ Terao \ and\ author Masao \ Shimizu ,\ title title Spontaneous volume magnetostriction in Y ( Fe 1-x Co x ) 2 and Zr ( Fe 1-x Co x ) 2 , \ 10.1016/0375-9601(83)90153-6 journal journal Phys. Lett. A \ volume 95 ,\ pages 111--114 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

    doi

  37. [45]

    Yamada , author T

    author author H. Yamada , author T. Tohyama , \ and\ author M. Shimizu ,\ title title Magnetic properties of Y ( Fe - Co ) 2 , \ 10.1016/0304-8853(87)90180-6 journal journal J. Magn. Magn. Mater. \ volume 66 ,\ pages 409--412 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    doi

  38. [46]

    Hilscher \ and\ author E

    author author G. Hilscher \ and\ author E. Gratz ,\ title title An estimation of the density of states from magnetization and resistivity measurements in Ti ( Fe 1-x Co x ) and Zr ( Fe 1-x Co x ) 2 , \ 10.1002/pssa.2210480226 journal journal phys. stat. sol. (a) \ volume 48 ,\...

    doi

  39. [47]

    author author Miros aw \ Werwi \'n ski , author Alexander \ Edstr \"o m , author J \'a n \ Rusz , author Daniel \ Hedlund , author Klas \ Gunnarsson , author Peter \ Svedlindh , author Johan \ Cedervall , \ and\ author Martin \ Sahlberg ,\ title title Magnetocrystalline anisot...

    doi

  40. [48]

    author author C. T. \ Chen , author Y. U. \ Idzerda , author H.-J. \ Lin , author N. V. \ Smith , author G. Meigs , author E. Chaban , author G. H. \ Ho , author E. Pellegrin , \ and\ author F. Sette ,\ title title Experimental Confirmation of the X - Ray Magnetic Circular Dic...

    doi

  41. [49]

    author author R. M. \ Moon ,\ title title Distribution of Magnetic Moment in Hexagonal Cobalt , \ 10.1103/PhysRev.136.A195 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 136 ,\ pages A195--A202 ( year 1964 ) NoStop

    1964 doi

  42. [50]

    author author R. A. \ Reck \ and\ author D. L. \ Fry ,\ title title Orbital and Spin Magnetization in Fe - Co , Fe - Ni , and Ni - Co , \ 10.1103/PhysRev.184.492 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 184 ,\ pages 492--495 ( year 1969 ) NoStop

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.