Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 59 references

Polar and phase domain walls with conducting interfacial states in a Weyl semimetal MoTe2

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read MoTe2 domain walls move under an electron beam and carry conducting states.

desk verdict First real-space images of 1T'/Td domain walls and e-beam-switchable domains in MoTe2, with the polar-domain assignment an honest inference rather than a direct measurement. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03082 v1 pith:2FATSEA2 submitted 2019-08-08 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Fei-Ting Huang , Seong Joon Lim , Sobhit Singh , Jinwoong Kim , Lunyong Zhang , Jae-Wook Kim , Ming-Wen Chu , Karin M. Rabe
show 2 more authors
David Vanderbilt Sang-Wook Cheong
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords MoTe2Weylsemimetalpolardomainwallsphasetransmissionelectronmicroscopyscanningtunnelinghigher-ordertopologyin-situcryo-TEM
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the layered semimetal MoTe2, in its low-temperature polar Td phase, forms two opposite-polarization variants—Td↑ and Td↓—separated by domain walls, and that these walls coexist with abundant 1T'/Td phase boundaries that stack into nanoscale superlattice-like arrays along the c axis. It further claims that focused electron-beam irradiation at 80 K reversibly drives the polar walls, and that scanning tunneling spectroscopy sees enhanced conductance at the phase walls, a possible signature of conducting hinge states. If true, the significance is that domain walls in a polar Weyl semimetal become self-assembled, addressable interfaces for topological electronic states rather than unwanted defects.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a compact stacking notation: each Te–Mo–Te layer is marked P or M for the two orientations of the Te octahedral distortion around the Mo zigzag chains, and each interlayer shear is marked + or − for the direction of Te–Te displacement. The 1T' and Td polymorphs are then just different sequences—1T'-I = +M+P+, 1T'-II = −M−P−, Td↑ = +M−P+, Td↓ = −M+P−—and a domain wall is a place where the sequence changes. This notation makes the microscopic relationship between the phases explicit, and together with the DFT potential-energy landscape (a high-symmetry T0 parent with two instabilities) it explains why polar switching prefers to pass through the nonpolar 1T' phase and why 1T' twin walls carry Td layers.

What would settle it

Atomic-resolution HAADF-STEM across one of the sharp bright/dark boundaries would settle the matter: if the Mo zigzag chains and Te environment do not reverse their ±c displacement direction across the wall, the Td↑/Td↓ assignment is wrong. Alternatively, if a free-standing, uncapped crystal shows no 1T'/Td coexistence on cooling, the superlattice interpretation of the capped cross-section images would be an artifact of mechanical constraint.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is the real-space coexistence and control of three kinds of interfaces in one crystal: polar domain walls between Td↑ and Td↓, phase domain walls between Td and the nonpolar higher-order topological 1T' phase, and twin walls of the 1T' phase that themselves contain Td-character layers. In cross-section dark-field TEM, the 1T' twins appear as micrometer-scale stripes, but on cooling the 1T' phase nucleates thin Td platelets that arrange quasi-periodically—the smallest observed period is about 4 nm, six layers—so the crystal becomes a natural superlattice of topological and non-topological units. In the ab-plane view, bright and dark domains at 80 K are assigned to Td↑ and Td↓, and the same walls move reversibly when the electron beam is focused on them. First-principles calculations show all four phases descend from a common centrosymmetric orthorhombic parent T0, with double-well instabilities in the interlayer shear coordinate and the monoclinic angle, and the lowest-energy path between the two polar states runs through the 1T' phase. STM on Fe-doped crystals finds that 1T'/Td walls show orientation-dependent enhanced conductance, which the authors interpret as a possible conducting hinge state.

Load-bearing premise

The bright/dark contrast in the in-plane images is assigned to Td↑ versus Td↓ domains, but the absolute polarization direction is never measured; if the contrast came from some other structural difference, the central polar-domain claim would weaken.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Polar walls in Td-MoTe2 are switchable at 80 K with a focused electron beam, with no apparent Te loss or damage, so the domains can be written and erased in a semimetal.
  • Because Td↑ and Td↓ are related by inversion, their Weyl points sit at the same momenta with opposite chirality; a Td↑/Td↓ wall projects opposite Fermi arcs and is a natural platform for studying Fermi-arc reconstruction.
  • Phase walls between the Weyl Td phase and the higher-order topological 1T' phase show enhanced, orientation-dependent tunneling conductance, consistent with conducting hinge states at the walls.
  • The quasi-periodic 1T'/Td stacking at low temperature is a natural superlattice whose period (as small as 4 nm) can be read directly from TEM contrast, giving a real-space handle on topological phase coexistence.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the e-beam switching works by the DFT-identified low-energy path through the intermediate 1T' phase, then ultrafast optical or electrical excitation that transiently stabilizes the 1T' shear should also toggle the polar state—an extension the paper does not demonstrate.
  • The same P/M and +/− stacking logic should apply to other layered polar Weyl semimetals such as WTe2, where analogous polar walls and phase walls may exist and could be searched for with the same dark-field TEM contrast.
  • The assignment of Td↑/Td↓ from bright/dark contrast could be tested directly by atomic-resolution STEM across a single wall; if confirmed, the same contrast could serve as a quick nondestructive readout of polarization in other van der Waals polar metals.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports an experimental and theoretical study of domain walls in semimetallic MoTe2. Using in-situ cryogenic dark-field TEM in cross-section and ab-plane geometries, HAADF-STEM, and low-temperature STM, together with DFT calculations, the authors claim the first observation of polar domains of the low-temperature Td Weyl phase (Td↑ and Td↓), abundant nanoscale 1T'/Td phase domain walls forming superlattice-like arrays along the c axis, reversible electron-beam manipulation of polar domains, and distinct local conductance at polar and phase domain walls. The DFT part identifies a centrosymmetric T0 reference structure with two instabilities, maps out an energy landscape with four minima (Td↑, Td↓, 1T'-I, 1T'-II), and proposes a low-energy path for Td↑↔Td↓ switching through a 1T' intermediate. The paper explicitly notes that the absolute polarization direction is not determined in the ab-plane TEM view and that the Td↑/Td↓ assignment needs further confirmation.

Significance. The topic is timely and the potential payoff is high: if the polar and phase domain structures are confirmed, MoTe2 becomes a controllable platform for engineering topological interfacial states, with implications for polar metals and Weyl semimetals. The paper has notable strengths: the DFT calculations are genuinely first-principles, with the Hubbard U and exchange J taken from prior literature rather than fitted to the observed domain patterns; the energy landscape is internally consistent; and the combination of DF-TEM, atomic-resolution HAADF-STEM, and STM provides multiple complementary observations. The group-theoretical family tree linking T0, 1T', and Td phases is elegant and gives testable structural predictions. The main weakness is that the central polar-domain assignment rests on DF-TEM contrast alone, with the absolute polarization direction unmeasured and an explicit admission in the Supplementary Material that atomic-resolution confirmation is still required.

major comments (3)
  1. [In-plane view of polar domains and domain walls / Methods / Supplementary Fig. 4] The central claim that the bright and dark ab-plane DF-TEM contrasts correspond to opposite polar variants Td↑ and Td↓ is underdetermined. The main text states that 'the absolute polarization direction cannot be identified in the ab-plane TEM view' and the assignment is made 'for the sake of simplicity'; Supplementary Fig. 4 explicitly says the assignment 'needs further confirmation by measurements such as atomic-resolved STEM imaging.' Because the DF-TEM contrast was obtained with g1± = ±(1,2,1bar) spots (Methods), it is sensitive not only to polarity but also to specimen thickness, bending, and the local 1T'/Td phase fraction; the manuscript itself invokes mechanical constraints to explain retained 1T' phase in the capped cross-section specimens (Supplementary Note 2). No atomic-resolution image of a nominal polar DW is provided. The authors should provide an independent structural probe—for example, atomic-scale STEM across a bright/dark boundary or a direct measurement of the polarization direction—before the existence of polar domains can be considered established.
  2. [Phase domain wall conductance / Fig. 5] The STM evidence for 'conducting interfacial states' does not yet support the hinge-state interpretation. The measurements were performed on Fe-doped MoTe2 with ~1.06% Fe impurities, and the manuscript notes that the quasiparticle interference patterns are dominated by Fe-dopant scattering (Supplementary Fig. 6). The first-type DWs show enhanced conductance in the empty state, but this is a local spectroscopic feature that could arise from topography, tip effects, or strain; no transport measurement or direct edge/hinge-state signature is presented. The text appropriately hedges this as a 'possible signature,' but the abstract and title elevate the conducting interfacial states to a headline result. The authors should either present direct evidence for a conducting hinge mode (e.g., spatially resolved spectroscopy with polarization dependence and comparison to theory) or clearly relegate the hinge-state assignment to a conjecture.
  3. [Cross-sectional view of abundant phase domain walls / Fig. 3] The identification of the superlattice-like modulations as −(Td)m(1T')n− stackings is plausible but not uniquely determined by the data. The thinnest periodicity of ~4 nm is interpreted as six layers, but Fig. 3c lists three possible six-layer configurations; the choice of −(Td)4(1T')2− as 'most likely' is based on energetic and lattice-mismatch reasoning rather than direct atomic-resolution imaging of the modulation. The paper also notes that the periodicity changes within a single twin domain, which is taken as evidence for opposite Td domains, but this inference relies on the same unconfirmed Td↑/Td↓ assignment. An atomic-resolution cross-section image that resolves the stacking sequence across one short-period modulation would remove the ambiguity.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'low-temperature(T)' should read 'low-temperature Td' or 'low-temperature (Td)' for clarity.
  2. [Results] 'combing first-principle calculations' should be 'combining first-principles calculations'.
  3. [Throughout] The manuscript uses inconsistent spacing in 'e- beam' and 'e-beam'; please standardize.
  4. [Methods] The sentence 'JEOL-2010F field-emission TEM quipped with a low-T sample stage' contains a typo; 'equipped' is intended.
  5. [Supplementary Fig. 4] The note that the Td↑/Td↓ assignments are 'only for simplicity and needs further confirmation' is important enough to be stated in the main text rather than only in the Supplementary Material.
  6. [Fig. 4c caption] 'Figures 4c show four TEM snapshots' should be 'Figure 4c shows four TEM snapshots'.
  7. [Discussion] The statement that Weyl points in Td↑ and Td↓ are 'topologically identical' is imprecise; the authors should clarify that the Weyl points have the same locations but opposite chirality.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation found; the DFT energy landscape is first-principles and the polar-domain labeling is an explicitly provisional operational assignment, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are experimental observations of DF-TEM domain contrast and phase coexistence, supplemented by first-principles DFT calculations. The DFT calculations use PBEsol + DFT+U with U = 2.4 eV and J = 0.4 eV taken from prior literature (ref. 54), not fitted to the observed domain patterns, and the potential energy surface is computed from structural relaxations and phonon instabilities of a high-symmetry T0 reference. No target quantity is defined in terms of a fitted parameter. The polar-domain assignment is explicitly provisional: the paper states 'the absolute polarization direction cannot be identified in the ab-plane TEM view. Thus, for the sake of simplicity, we assign bright-contrast domains as Td↑ and dark-contrast domain as Td↓', and Supplementary Fig. 4 concedes the assignment 'needs further confirmation by measurements such as atomic-resolved STEM imaging.' This is an acknowledged limitation or underdetermination, not a circular derivation, because the existence of two contrast domains and their reversible e-beam manipulation are direct observations independent of the provisional labels. The STM claim of a conducting hinge state is also hedged ('indicates a possible signature' and 'can be promising candidates'), and no load-bearing argument reduces to a self-citation. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks and its derivation chain is not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particle, force, or conserved quantity is postulated. The T0 reference structure is a hypothetical high-symmetry phase used only for the energy landscape, not claimed to exist as a real phase.

free parameters (1)
  • Hubbard U and exchange J for Mo 4d electrons = U = 2.4 eV, J = 0.4 eV
    Adopted from ref. 54 for MoTe2; affects the DFT energy landscape, including relative stability of Td vs 1T', but not fitted to the present data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption PBEsol + DFT+U with the chosen U/J accurately describes the relative energies of 1T', Td and T0 phases of MoTe2.
    The energy landscape in Fig. 4d, including barriers 5-17 meV/u.c., is computed with this functional; no experimental benchmark within the paper validates the barrier heights.
  • domain assumption The observed DF-TEM contrast in the ab-plane corresponds to opposite polar variants of the Td phase.
    No atomic-resolution polarization measurement; the authors flag this as an assignment needing confirmation (Supplementary Note 4).
  • domain assumption The persistence of 1T'/Td coexistence at 80 K in capped TEM specimens is due to mechanical constraints resisting layer glide.
    Proposed in Supplementary Note 2; alternative explanations such as beam effects or impurity pinning are not fully excluded.
  • domain assumption The enhanced STM conductance at phase domain walls reflects intrinsic electronic structure rather than Fe dopant segregation or topography.
    Fe doping is ~1% and defects dominate QPI patterns (Supplementary Fig. 6); no control experiment on undoped crystals at the same DWs is presented.
  • domain assumption 1T'-MoTe2 is a higher-order topological insulator and Td-MoTe2 is a type-II Weyl semimetal, as established in prior works.
    Cited from refs 16,17,35-37,40,41; the paper builds its hinge-state interpretation on these classifications.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Polar and phase domain walls with conducting interfacial states in a Weyl semimetal MoTe2." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2FATSEA2

@misc{pith2026190803082,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Polar and phase domain walls with conducting interfacial states in a Weyl semimetal MoTe2},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2FATSEA2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03082}
}
read the original abstract

Much of the dramatic growth in research on topological materials has focused on topologically protected surface states. While the domain walls of topological materials such as Weyl semimetals with broken inversion or time-reversal symmetry can provide a hunting ground for exploring topological interfacial states, such investigations have received little attention to date. Here, utilizing in-situ cryogenic transmission electron microscopy combined with first-principles calculations, we discover intriguing domain-wall structures in MoTe2, both between polar variants of the low-temperature(T) Weyl phase, and between this and the high-T high-order topological phase. We demonstrate how polar domain walls can be manipulated with electron beams and show that phase domain walls tend to form superlattice-like structures along the c axis. Scanning tunneling microscopy indicates a possible signature of a conducting hinge state at phase domain walls. Our results open avenues for investigating topological interfacial states and unveiling multifunctional aspects of domain walls in topological materials.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bradlyn, B. et al. Topological quantum chemistry. Nature 547, 298–305 (2017)

    2017

  2. [2]

    & Felser, C

    Yan, B. & Felser, C. Topological materials: Weyl semimetals. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 8, 337–354 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    P., Mele, E

    Armitage, N. P., Mele, E. J. & Vishwanath, A. Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three- dimensional solids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015001 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    Z., Xu, S.-Y., Belopolski, I

    Hasan, M. Z., Xu, S.-Y., Belopolski, I. & Huang, S.-M. Discovery of Weyl fermion semimetals and topological Fermi arc states. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 8, 289–309 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    A., Wu, S

    Zyuzin, A. A., Wu, S. & Burkov, A. A. Weyl semimetal with broken time reversal and inversion symmetries. Phys. Rev. B 85, 165110 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Xu, S.-Y. et al. Discovery of a Weyl fermion semimetal and topological Fermi arcs. Science 349, 613–617 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    & Franz, M

    Chen, A. & Franz, M. Superconducting proximity effect and Majorana flat bands at the surface of a Weyl semimetal. Phys. Rev. B 93, 201105 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    E., Diez, M

    O’Brien, T. E., Diez, M. & Beenakker, C. W. J. Magnetic breakdown and Klein tunneling in a type-II Weyl semimetal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 236401 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Grushin, A. G. & Bardarson, J. H. How to make devices with Weyl materials. Physics Today 10, 63 (2017). 20

    2017

  2. [10]

    & Gong, W.-J

    Li, X.-S., Zhang, S.-F., Sun, X.-R. & Gong, W.-J. Double Andreev reflections and double electron transmissions in a normal-superconductor-normal junction based on type-II Weyl semimetal. New J. Phys. 20, 103005 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    Edmonds, M. T. et al. Stability and surface reconstruction of topological insulator Bi2Se3 on exposure to atmosphere. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 20413–20419 (2014)

    2014

  4. [12]

    Lee, C.-H. et al. Tungsten ditelluride: a layered semimetal. Sci. Rep. 5, 10013 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    Butler, C. J. et al. Mapping polarization induced surface band bending on the Rashba semiconductor BiTeI. Nat. Commun. 5, 4066 (2014)

    2014

  6. [14]

    Ugeda, M. M. et al. Observation of topologically protected states at crystalline phase boundaries in single-layer WSe2. Nat. Commun. 9, 3401 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Yin, L.-J., Jiang, H., Qiao, J.-B. & He, L. Direct imaging of topological edge states at a bilayer graphene domain wall. Nat. Commun. 7, 11760 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    N., Felser, C

    Sun, Y., Wu, S.-C., Ali, M. N., Felser, C. & Yan, B. Prediction of Weyl semimetal in orthorhombic MoTe2. Phys. Rev. B 92, 161107 (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    Jiang, J. et al. Signature of type-II Weyl semimetal phase in MoTe2. Nat. Commun. 8, 13973 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    Autès, G., Gresch, D., Troyer, M., Soluyanov, A. A. & Yazyev, O. V. Robust type- II Weyl semimetal phase in transition metal diphosphides XP2 (X=Mo, W). Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 066402 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    Wu, L. et al. Giant anisotropic nonlinear optical response in transition metal monopnictide Weyl semimetals. Nat. Phys. 13, 350–355 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    Xu, S.-Y. et al. Discovery of Lorentz-violating type II Weyl fermions in LaAlGe. Sci Adv 3, e1603266 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    Chang, G. et al. Magnetic and noncentrosymmetric Weyl fermion semimetals in the RAlGe family of compounds (R = rare earth). Phys. Rev. B 97, 041104 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Benedek, N. A. & Birol, T. ‘Ferroelectric’ metals reexamined: fundamental mechanisms and design considerations for new materials. J. Mater. Chem. C 4, 4000–4015 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    Shi, Y. et al. A ferroelectric-like structural transition in a metal. Nat. Mater. 12, 1024–1027 (2013)

    2013

  16. [24]

    Kim, T. H. et al. Polar metals by geometric design. Nature 533, 68–72 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    Lei, S. et al. Observation of quasi-two-dimensional polar domains and ferroelastic switching in a metal, Ca3Ru2O7. Nano Lett. 18, 3088–3095 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    Stone, G. et al. Atomic and electronic structure of domains walls in a polar metal. Phys. Rev. B 99, 014105 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Nukala, P. et al. Inverting polar domains via electrical pulsing in metallic germanium telluride. Nat. Commun. 8, 15033 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    Fermi arc reconstruction at junctions between Weyl semimetals

    Dwivedi, V. Fermi arc reconstruction at junctions between Weyl semimetals. Phys. Rev. B 97, 064201 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    Iaia, D. et al. Searching for topological Fermi arcs via quasiparticle interference on a type-II Weyl semimetal MoTe2. npj Quantum Mater. 3, 38 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    Sakano, M. et al. Observation of spin-polarized bands and domain-dependent Fermi arcs in polar Weyl semimetal MoTe2. Phys. Rev. B 95, 121101 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    Sie, E. J. et al. An ultrafast symmetry switch in a Weyl semimetal. Nature 565, 61– 66 (2019). 21

    2019

  24. [32]

    Yang, J. et al. Elastic and electronic tuning of magnetoresistance in MoTe2. Sci Adv 3, eaao4949 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    Heikes, C. et al. Mechanical control of crystal symmetry and superconductivity in Weyl semimetal MoTe2. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 074202 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    Qi, Y. et al. Superconductivity in Weyl semimetal candidate MoTe2. Nat. Commun. 7, 11038 (2016)

    2016

  27. [35]

    C., Vishwanath, A

    Tang, F., Po, H. C., Vishwanath, A. & Wan, X. Efficient topological materials discovery using symmetry indicators. Nat. Phys. 15, 470-476 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    J., Li, J., Yan, B

    Wang, Z., Wieder, B. J., Li, J., Yan, B. & Bernevig, B. A. Higher-order topology, monopole nodal lines, and the origin of large fermi arcs in transition metal dichalcogenides XTe2 (X=Mo,W). arXiv 1806.11116 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Second-order topological insulators and loop-nodal semimetals in transition metal dichalcogenides XTe2 (X = Mo, W)

    Ezawa, M. Second-order topological insulators and loop-nodal semimetals in transition metal dichalcogenides XTe2 (X = Mo, W). Sci. Rep. 9, 5286 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Yuan, S. et al. Room-temperature ferroelectricity in MoTe2 down to the atomic monolayer limit. Nat. Commun. 10, 1775 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    Fei, Z. et al. Ferroelectric switching of a two-dimensional metal. Nature 560, 336– 339 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    Wang, Z. et al. MoTe2: A type-II Weyl topological metal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 551 (2016)

    2016

  33. [41]

    Tamai, A. et al. Fermi arcs and their topological character in the candidate type-II Weyl semimetal MoTe2. Phys. Rev. X 6, 031021 (2016)

    2016

  34. [42]

    Keum, D. H. et al. Bandgap opening in few-layered monoclinic MoTe2. Nat. Phys. 11, 482–486 (2015)

    2015

  35. [43]

    Yan, X.-J. et al. Investigation on the phase-transition-induced hysteresis in the thermal transport along the c-axis of MoTe2. npj Quantum Mater. 2, 31 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    Sakai, H. et al. Critical enhancement of thermopower in a chemically tuned polar semimetal MoTe2. Sci Adv 2, e1601378 (2016)

    2016

  37. [45]

    Wang, Y. et al. Structural phase transition in monolayer MoTe2 driven by electrostatic doping. Nature 550, 487–491 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    Cho, S. et al. Phase patterning for ohmic homojunction contact in MoTe₂. Science 349, 625–628 (2015)

    2015

  39. [47]

    W., Chhowalla, M

    Yang, H., Kim, S. W., Chhowalla, M. & Lee, Y. H. Structural and quantum-state phase transition in van der Waals layered materials. Nat. Phys. 13, 931–937 (2017)

    2017

  40. [48]

    O., Huang, Y.-S

    Lin, Y.-C., Dumcenco, D. O., Huang, Y.-S. & Suenaga, K. Atomic mechanism of the semiconducting-to-metallic phase transition in single-layered MoS2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 391–396 (2014)

    2014

  41. [49]

    Hart, J. L. et al. Electron-beam-induced ferroelectric domain behavior in the transmission electron microscope: Toward deterministic domain patterning. Phys. Rev. B 94, 174104 (2016)

    2016

  42. [50]

    Chen, Z., Wang, X., Ringer, S. P. & Liao, X. Manipulation of nanoscale domain switching using an electron beam with omnidirectional electric field distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 027601 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    & Furthmuller, J

    Kresse, G. & Furthmuller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996)

    1996

  44. [52]

    & Joubert, D

    Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999). 22

    1999

  45. [53]

    Perdew, J. P. et al. Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136406 (2008)

    2008

  46. [54]

    Xu, N. et al. Evidence of a coulomb-interaction-induced Lifshitz transition and robust hybrid Weyl semimetal in Td-MoTe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 136401 (2018)

    2018

  47. [55]

    & Tanaka, I

    Togo, A., Oba, F. & Tanaka, I. First-principles calculations of the ferroelastic transition between rutile-type and CaCl2-type SiO2 at high pressures. Phys. Rev. B 78, 134106 (2008)

    2008

  48. [56]

    & Hughes, H

    Clarke, R., Marseglia, E. & Hughes, H. P. A low-temperature structural phase transition in β-MoTe2. Philosophical Magazine B 38, 121–126 (1978)

    1978

  49. [57]

    Stokes, H. T. & Hatch, D. M., Isotropy Subgroups of the 230 Crystallographic Space Groups (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988)

    1988

  50. [58]

    & Kane, C

    Fu, L. & Kane, C. L. Topological insulators with inversion symmetry. Phys. Rev. B 76, 045302 (2007)

    2007

  51. [59]

    Schindler, F. et al. Higher-order topology in bismuth. Nat. Phys. 14, 918 (2018). Supplementary Information Polar and phase domain walls with conducting interfacial states in a Weyl semimetal MoTe2 Huang et al. Supplementary Note 1 The origin of the uncompensated dipole in Td-...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.