Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 45 references

Sustained coherent spin wave emission using frequency combs

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A 1 GHz femtosecond pulse train drives sustained, coherent spin-wave emission in a NiFe film.

desk verdict Comb-driven spin waves in a metal, with real spatial BLS maps; the phase-locking claim is plausible but not directly measured. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03388 v2 pith:STPSUCXJ submitted 2019-08-09 cond-mat.mes-hall physics.app-ph

A. A. Awad , S. Muralidhar , A. Alemán , R. Khymyn , M. Dvornik , D. Hanstorp , J. {AA}kerman This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.app-ph
keywords spinwavesmagnonicsBrillouinlightscatteringrapiddemagnetizationfrequencycombsfemtosecondlaserpermalloythinfilmscoherentamplification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that a train of femtosecond laser pulses, arriving once every nanosecond, can keep a metallic ferromagnet precessing in a sustained, coherent way. Because each pulse arrives before the previous spin-wave excitation has decayed, only magnons whose frequencies are exact multiples of the 1 GHz repetition rate receive a kick in the same phase on every pulse, so they grow into sharp spectral lines. The experiment uses a scanning micro-Brillouin light scattering microscope to observe these harmonic lines, map which modes stay local and which propagate, and show that the propagation direction follows the in-plane applied field. If the claim holds, it turns a standard metal-film sample into a light-driven continuous spin-wave source and gives time-averaged BLS a quantitative role in ultrafast demagnetization studies.

What carries the argument

The central object is the frequency comb, an evenly spaced train of femtosecond pulses at 1 GHz, acting as a periodic phase-locked kick to the magnetization. Each pulse produces a rapid demagnetization step delta M_s followed by a recovery, and because the 1 ns pulse spacing is shorter than the magnon decay time, the precession at harmonics f_n = n times 1 GHz is reinforced while off-harmonic modes are not. The quantitative model uses the Bloch-law form delta M_s = A(t_r^(3/2) - (t_r + F)^(3/2)) together with the BLS signal scaling as the square of the magnetodynamic amplitude. In the simulations, the same physics is represented by an instantaneous Gaussian reduction of the saturation magnetization at the pump spot, repeated at 1 GHz.

What would settle it

Replace the coherent 1 GHz pulse train with pulses of the same fluence arriving at random intervals, or with continuous illumination of the same average power: if the sharp 1 GHz-spaced peaks persist, the emission is thermal rather than coherent; if they disappear, the periodic phase-locked kicks are necessary.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In a 20 nm Ni80Fe20 film on sapphire, a diffraction-limited 816 nm pulse train at 1 GHz repetition rate, with roughly 120 fs pulses and about 1.8 mJ/$cm^{2}$ fluence, produces BLS spectra dominated by sharp peaks at every integer multiple of 1 GHz. The peaks rise about an order of magnitude above the thermal spin-wave background, with the strongest peak near the ferromagnetic resonance frequency, about 8 GHz at 600 mT. The paper interprets this as coherent amplification: each pulse rapidly demagnetizes the film, and because the pulse period is shorter than the magnon decay time, magnons whose frequency matches a comb harmonic are repeatedly driven in phase. Spatial scans show that the 8 and 9 GHz modes propagate away from the pump spot perpendicular to the in-plane field, with a measured decay length near 1.85 micrometers for 8 GHz, while lower harmonics stay localized at the pump spot. The BLS counts grow faster than quadratically with laser fluence and are accounted for by a Bloch T^(3/2) law for the demagnetization step, delta M_s = A(t_r^(3/2) - (t_r + F)^(3/2)). Micromagnetic simulations that model each pulse as an instantaneous Gaussian reduction of the saturation magnetization reproduce the harmonic spectra, the difference between pump-spot and one-micron-away spectra, and the phase fronts of the propagating modes.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim hinges on the assumption that each pulse acts as an instantaneous, phase-locked reduction of the magnetization, so spin waves at harmonics of the 1 GHz repetition rate are coherently amplified; the paper infers this phase locking from the harmonic spectrum and from simulations, not from a direct measurement of the magnetization's phase.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A metallic ferromagnet can be driven into sustained coherent precession by light alone, without a microwave antenna, as long as the pulse repetition rate exceeds the spin-wave damping rate.
  • The emission frequency is selected by the comb: only integer multiples of the 1 GHz repetition rate are amplified, and the applied field tunes which harmonic dominates and which wave vector is selected.
  • Micro-focused Brillouin light scattering can map both localized and propagating spin waves generated by rapid demagnetization, with the propagation direction set by the in-plane component of the applied magnetic field.
  • The super-parabolic power dependence gives a time-averaged, quantitative readout of the demagnetization step, making BLS a practical tool for rapid-demagnetization studies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The harmonic structure alone does not strictly prove phase locking; a time-resolved measurement of the precession phase just before each pulse would distinguish coherent comb driving from a thermal intensity modulation and would measure the phase accumulated between kicks.
  • If the comb mechanism is generic, it should transfer to higher-damping metallic devices and to low-damping insulating garnets, where much lower repetition rates should already sustain emission; varying the repetition rate would be a direct experimental check.
  • Structuring the pump into multiple spots or spatially shaped light could create interference patterns in the propagating spin waves, effectively writing reconfigurable magnonic circuits; the paper notes multi-spot excitation as straightforward but does not work out the interference consequences.
  • The Bloch-law fit suggests BLS could serve as a non-contact probe of magnon temperature, since the power dependence of a fixed harmonic encodes the exponent and amplitude of the demagnetization step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports experiments in which a 1 GHz femtosecond laser pulse train irradiates a 20 nm NiFe film under an oblique magnetic field, and scanning micro-Brillouin light scattering (BLS) detects spin-wave spectra showing peaks at harmonics of the 1 GHz repetition rate. The authors interpret this as coherent amplification of spin waves whose frequencies are multiples of the repetition rate, because the pulse separation is shorter than the magnon decay time. They present power-dependent spectra, spatial maps showing both localized modes and propagating modes at 8 and 9 GHz, and Mumax3 simulations that reproduce the main spectral and spatial features. They also model the BLS counts versus laser fluence using a Bloch-law demagnetization amplitude with two free parameters and claim a stronger-than-quadratic dependence.

Significance. If the central mechanism is validated, this work demonstrates a new platform for photo-magnonics: sustained, optically driven coherent spin-wave emission in a metallic ferromagnet, with control of the propagation direction via the applied field, and it shows that time-averaged BLS can be used for rapid-demagnetization studies. The observation of 1 GHz harmonic peaks is supported by spectra at multiple powers, by spatial mapping, and by micromagnetic simulations; the separation of localized and propagating modes and the field-direction control are substantive advances. However, the load-bearing claim that the harmonics arise from phase-locked, coherent accumulation of spin-wave amplitude between pulses is not directly measured, since time-averaged BLS cannot distinguish phase-locked precession from periodic modulation of the scattering efficiency. The paper's value as a platform depends on this mechanism, so the missing phase evidence is a significant gap that should be addressed before publication.

major comments (3)
  1. [III.A, Figs. 3-6] The central claim of phase-locked coherent amplification is inferred from the harmonic structure of time-averaged BLS spectra, but such a measurement cannot distinguish between phase-locked spin-wave precession and any periodic modulation of the BLS scattering process at the 1 GHz repetition rate (for example, pump-induced reflectivity changes, surface displacement, or magnon-temperature modulation). The spatial propagation of the 8 and 9 GHz modes demonstrates that real propagating spin waves are excited at those harmonics, but it does not establish the phase-accumulation mechanism; nor does it rule out a non-magnetic or thermal artifact for the localized low-frequency modes. A direct phase measurement of the magnetization relative to the pulse train (e.g., time-resolved MOKE or phase-resolved BLS) is required to support the abstract's claim that magnons are 'coherently amplified.'
  2. [III.A, Fig. 4(c,d)] The Bloch-law model is fit to the same fluence data it is used to explain, with A and tr as free parameters, and no fitted values, uncertainties, number of data points, or goodness-of-fit statistics are reported. The agreement is therefore a two-parameter fit rather than a parameter-free prediction, and the 'stronger than parabolic' dependence is not quantitatively established. Please report the fitted parameters with error bars and compare the model with a simple power law or other alternatives.
  3. [III.C, Fig. 7] The micromagnetic simulations are presented as strong corroboration of the experiment, but the demagnetization pulse parameters are not specified: the text does not give the pulse amplitude (delta M_s / M_s) or the recovery time constant used in Mumax3. Without these parameters the reader cannot assess whether the simulated harmonic amplitudes and spatial profiles follow from a realistic pulse or from tuning. Please specify all pulse parameters and, ideally, show the sensitivity of the simulated spectra to their variation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [IV, Conclusions] In the Conclusions section, 'play a key roled' should be 'play a key role'.
  2. [III.C] The simulation description ('in form of subtracting or adding the demagnetization tensor corresponding to the magnetization state at both the demagnetized and recovered states') is unclear and should be rewritten to explain precisely how the pulse is implemented in Mumax3.
  3. [Fig. 3] The text reports sizable BLS counts below the spin-wave band at the harmonics; please clarify whether these are interpreted as evanescent/localized modes or whether any non-magnetic background contribution is subtracted.
  4. [III.B, Fig. 4(c,d)] The power-dependence measurements are averaged over five spots, but no error bars are shown; please add error bars or state the scatter explicitly.
  5. [II.B] Please state the timing jitter or repetition-rate stability of the 1 GHz mode-locked laser, since pulse-to-pulse phase stability is essential for coherent accumulation.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Central harmonic-comb observation is independent; the Bloch-law fluence model is fit to the data it explains.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section III.A, Fig. 4(c,d), paragraph beginning 'Our theoretical model assumes...']
    "In the low temperature limit, the temperature dependence of the magnetization should follow a Bloch T 3/2 law and consequently δ Ms = A ( t 3/2 r − (tr + F)3/2 ), where F is the laser fluence, and A are tr are coefficients defined by the magnetization Ms(T = 0), the Curie and room temperatures, and the heating efficiency of the laser. One can fit BLS counts as δM2 s = A2 ( t3/2 r − (tr + F)3/2 )2. The model is found to fit both curves exceptionally well."

    The model's parameters A and t_r are not independently measured or predicted from first principles; they are free parameters fitted to the same BLS-counts-versus-fluence data that the model is then said to 'fully account for'. The agreement between the fitted curve and the data is therefore a two-parameter interpolation, not an independent test. The observation of a super-parabolic power dependence is genuine, but the attribution to a Bloch-law demagnetization step remains a curve-fit conclusion: the same data set determines both the free constants and the claimed validity of the functional form.

full rationale

The paper's central observation — harmonic peaks at multiples of the 1 GHz repetition rate, their field dependence, and their spatial propagation profiles — is an independent experimental result, not derived from the model. The MuMax3 simulation assumes a periodic δMs kick at the 1 GHz clock frequency, so the harmonic comb in the simulated spectra is partly an input; nevertheless, the simulation also reproduces non-trivial features such as the amplitude envelope near FMR, the suppression away from the pump, and the propagation directions, which are not built in by the drive. That makes the simulation a useful consistency check rather than a circular derivation. The one genuinely circular element is the Bloch-law power-dependence analysis: the functional form δM_s^2 = A^2(t_r^{3/2} − (t_r+F)^{3/2})^2 has two free parameters fitted to the same fluence-BLS-counts data it is then said to explain, so the 'agreement' demonstrates curve-fitting ability, not an independent confirmation that demagnetization follows a Bloch law. The phase-locking interpretation of the harmonic comb is an inference that could be challenged by alternative periodic-modulation mechanisms, but that is an evidence/completeness concern rather than a circular derivation. Overall, the central claim of sustained coherent spin wave emission rests on independent measurements, and the circularity is confined to a secondary power-dependence analysis.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central demonstration rests on standard magnonics and BLS physics. The main added assumptions are the linear fluence-to-temperature relation, the Bloch-law form of the demagnetization step, and the instantaneous pulse approximation in simulations. Two fit coefficients A and tr are used in the power-dependence model. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • A (Bloch-law coefficient) = not stated (fit)
    In the model δMs = A(tr^{3/2} - (tr+F)^{3/2}), A scales the demagnetization step; the paper says it is defined by magnetization, Curie and room temperatures, and heating efficiency, but the values are obtained by fitting the BLS counts vs fluence curves in Fig. 4(c,d).
  • tr (temperature-related offset in Bloch-law fit) = not stated (fit)
    Together with A, tr sets the curvature of the BLS counts vs fluence; it is fit to the same data and is not independently measured.
  • Simulation demagnetization pulse amplitude and recovery time = not stated in text
    The MuMax3 simulations apply an instantaneous reduction of Ms followed by slower recovery, but the magnitude and recovery time constant of the demagnetization pulse are not listed; these inputs affect the simulated harmonic spectra and spatial maps.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Bloch T^{3/2} law describes the low-temperature magnetization temperature dependence and is applied to the demagnetization step δMs.
    Invoked in Section III.A to model the power dependence.
  • domain assumption Each optical pulse raises the magnetic subsystem temperature in linear proportion to laser fluence, so the demagnetization magnitude follows tr^{3/2} - (tr+F)^{3/2}.
    Assumed in Section III.A; no separate thermal transport measurement is provided.
  • domain assumption BLS counts are proportional to the square of the dynamic magnetization amplitude and hence to the magnon population.
    Used throughout to interpret BLS counts as spin wave intensity; standard for BLS, but not calibrated in this experiment.
  • domain assumption The magnetization dynamics follows the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation as implemented in MuMax3, with parameters Ms=781.75 kA/m, Aex=11.3 pJ/m, and damping 0.01.
    Used in Section III.C for micromagnetic simulations; parameters come from prior literature or separate FMR measurement.
  • domain assumption The magnon decay time in the NiFe film exceeds the 1 ns pulse period, allowing coherent accumulation.
    Required by the model and supported by the observed harmonic peaks, but not directly measured.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sustained coherent spin wave emission using frequency combs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/STPSUCXJ

@misc{pith2026190803388,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sustained coherent spin wave emission using frequency combs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/STPSUCXJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03388}
}
read the original abstract

We demonstrate sustained coherent emission of spin waves in NiFe films using rapid demagnetization from high repetition rate femtosecond laser pulse trains. As the pulse separation is shorter than the magnon decay time, magnons having a frequency equal to a multiple of the 1 GHz repetition-rate are coherently amplified. Using scanning micro-Brillouin Light Scattering (BLS) we observe this coherent amplification as strong peaks spaced 1 GHz apart. The BLS counts vs. laser power exhibit a stronger than parabolic dependence consistent with counts being proportional to the square of the magnetodynamic amplitude, and the demagnetization pulse strength being described by a Bloch law. Spatial spin wave mapping demonstrates how both localized and propagating spin waves can be excited, and how the propagation direction can be directly controlled. Our results demonstrate the versatility of BLS spectroscopy for rapid demagnetization studies and enable a new platform for photo-magnonics where sustained coherent spin waves can be utilized.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.03388 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. a: The pump beam was produced by a commercial Ti:Sa mode-locked laser with a 1 GHz repetition rate at a wavelength of 816 nm, a 30 fs Fourier-limited pulse duration and pulse energies up to 1nJ. The laser pulse stretches during propagation in the optical system ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author V. V. \ Kruglyak , author S. O. \ Demokritov , \ and\ author D. Grundler ,\ title title Magnonics , \ 10.1088/0022-3727/43/26/264001 journal journal J. Phys. D \ volume 43 ,\ pages 264001 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1088/0022-3727/43/26/264001 2010

  2. [2]

    author author S. O. \ Demokritov \ and\ author A. N. \ Slavin ,\ @noop title Magnonics: From fundamentals to applications ,\ Topics in Applied Physics\ ( publisher Springer Nature ,\ year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Neusser \ and\ author D

    author author S. Neusser \ and\ author D. Grundler ,\ title title Magnonics: Spin Waves on the Nanoscale , \ 10.1002/adma.200900809 journal journal Adv. Mat. \ volume 21 ,\ pages 2927--2932 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1002/adma.200900809 2009

  4. [4]

    author author A. V. \ Chumak , author V. Vasyuchka , author A. Serga , \ and\ author B. Hillebrands ,\ title title Magnon spintronics , \ 10.1038/nphys3347 journal journal Nat. Phys. \ volume 11 ,\ pages 453--461 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/nphys3347 2015

  5. [5]

    Yu , author O

    author author H. Yu , author O. d' Allivy Kelly , author V. Cros , author R. Bernard , author P. Bortolotti , author A. Anane , author F. Brandl , author F. Heimbach , \ and\ author D. Grundler ,\ title title Approaching soft X-ray wavelengths in nanomagnet-based microwave technology , \ 10.1038/ncomms11255 journal journal Nat. Comm. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 1...

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms11255

  6. [6]

    Wolf ,\ title title Free Oscillations of the Magnetization in Permalloy Films , \ 10.1063/1.2000514 journal journal J

    author author P. Wolf ,\ title title Free Oscillations of the Magnetization in Permalloy Films , \ 10.1063/1.2000514 journal journal J. Appl. Phys. \ volume 32 ,\ pages S95--S96 ( year 1961 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2000514 1961

  7. [7]

    author author A. K. \ Ganguly \ and\ author D. C. \ Webb ,\ title title Microstrip excitation of magnetostatic surface waves: Theory and experiment , \ 10.1109/TMTT.1975.1128733 journal journal IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory. Tech. \ volume 23 ,\ pages 998--1006 ( year 1975 ) NoStop

    work page arXiv 1975

  8. [8]

    author author V. E. \ Demidov , author S. O. \ Demokritov , author K. Rott , author P. Krzysteczko , \ and\ author G. Reiss ,\ title title Nano-optics with spin waves at microwave frequencies , \ 10.1063/1.2945000 journal journal Appl. Phys. Lett. \ volume 92 ,\ pages 232503 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2945000

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    author author V. E. \ Demidov , author S. Urazhdin , \ and\ author S. O. \ Demokritov ,\ title title Direct observation and mapping of spin waves emitted by spin-torque nano-oscillators , \ 10.1038/nmat2882 journal journal Nat. Mat. \ volume 9 ,\ pages 984--988 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    doi

  2. [10]

    Bonetti , author V

    author author S. Bonetti , author V. Tiberkevich , author G. Consolo , author G. Finocchio , author P. Muduli , author F. Mancoff , author A. Slavin , \ and\ author J. kerman ,\ title title Experimental evidence of self-localized and propagating spin wave modes in obliquely ma...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Madami , author S

    author author M. Madami , author S. Bonetti , author G. Consolo , author S. Tacchi , author G. Carlotti , author G. Gubbiotti , author F. B. \ Mancoff , author Y. M. \ A. , \ and\ author J. kerman ,\ title title Direct observation of a propagating spin wave induced by spin-tra...

    doi

  4. [12]

    Chen , author R

    author author T. Chen , author R. K. \ Dumas , author A. Eklund , author P. K. \ Muduli , author A. Houshang , author A. A. \ Awad , author P. Dürrenfeld , author B. G. \ Malm , author A. Rusu , \ and\ author J. Åkerman ,\ title title Spin-Torque and Spin-Hall Nano-Oscillators...

  5. [13]

    Houshang , author E

    author author A. Houshang , author E. Iacocca , author P. D \" u rrenfeld , author S. R. \ Sani , author J. kerman , \ and\ author R. K. \ Dumas ,\ title title Spin-wave-beam driven synchronization of nanocontact spin-torque oscillators , \ 10.1038/nnano.2015.280 journal journ...

    doi

  6. [14]

    Dürrenfeld , author A

    author author P. Dürrenfeld , author A. A. \ Awad , author A. Houshang , author R. K. \ Dumas , \ and\ author J. kerman ,\ title title A 20 nm spin hall nano-oscillator , \ 10.1039/C6NR07903B journal journal Nanoscale \ volume 9 ,\ pages 1285--1291 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi

  7. [15]

    Houshang , author R

    author author A. Houshang , author R. Khymyn , author H. Fulara , author A. Gangwar , author M. Haidar , author S. R. \ Etesami , author R. Ferreira , author P. P. \ Freitas , author M. Dvornik , author R. K. \ Dumas , \ and\ author J. kerman ,\ title title Spin transfer torqu...

    doi

  8. [16]

    Divinskiy , author V

    author author B. Divinskiy , author V. E. \ Demidov , author S. Urazhdin , author R. Freeman , author A. B. \ Rinkevich , \ and\ author S. O. \ Demokritov ,\ title title Excitation and Amplification of Spin Waves by Spin–Orbit Torque , \ 10.1002/adma.201802837 journal journal ...

    doi

  9. [17]

    Fulara , author M

    author author H. Fulara , author M. Zahedinejad , author R. Khymyn , author A. A. \ Awad , author S. Muralidhar , author M. Dvornik , \ and\ author J. A kerman ,\ title title Spin-orbit torque driven propagating spin waves , \ https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/5/9/eaax84...

    2019

  10. [18]

    Beaurepaire , author J.-C

    author author E. Beaurepaire , author J.-C. \ Merle , author A. Daunois , \ and\ author J.-Y. \ Bigot ,\ title title Ultrafast spin dynamics in ferromagnetic nickel , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4250 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 76 ,\ pages 4250--4253 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    doi

  11. [19]

    Koopmans , author G

    author author B. Koopmans , author G. Malinowski , author F. Dalla Longa , author D. Steiauf , author M. F \" a hnle , author T. Roth , author M. Cinchetti , \ and\ author M. Aeschlimann ,\ title title Explaining the paradoxical diversity of ultrafast laser-induced demagnetiza...

    doi

  12. [20]

    Rudolf , author C

    author author D. Rudolf , author C. La-O-Vorakiat , author M. Battiato , author R. Adam , author J. M. \ Shaw , author E. Turgut , author P. Maldonado , author S. Mathias , author P. Grychtol , author H. T. \ Nembach , author T. J. \ Silva , author M. Aeschlimann , author H. C...

    doi

  13. [21]

    \ Lambert , author S

    author author C.-H. \ Lambert , author S. Mangin , author B. S. D. C. S. \ Varaprasad , author Y. K. \ Takahashi , author M. Hehn , author M. Cinchetti , author G. Malinowski , author K. Hono , author Y. Fainman , author M. Aeschlimann , \ and\ author E. E. \ Fullerton ,\ titl...

    doi

  14. [22]

    Mangin , author M

    author author S. Mangin , author M. Gottwald , author C.-H. \ Lambert , author D. Steil , author V. Uhl \' i ř , author L. Pang , author M. Hehn , author S. Alebrand , author M. Cinchetti , author G. Malinowski , author Y. Fainman , author M. Aeschlimann , \ and\ author E. E. ...

    doi

  15. [23]

    Ju , author A

    author author G. Ju , author A. V. \ Nurmikko , author R. F. C. \ Farrow , author R. F. \ Marks , author M. J. \ Carey , \ and\ author B. A. \ Gurney ,\ title title Ultrafast time resolved photoinduced magnetization rotation in a ferromagnetic/antiferromagnetic exchange couple...

    doi

  16. [24]

    van Kampen , author C

    author author M. van Kampen , author C. Jozsa , author J. T. \ Kohlhepp , author P. LeClair , author L. Lagae , author W. J. M. \ de Jonge , \ and\ author B. Koopmans ,\ title title All-optical probe of coherent spin waves , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.227201 journal journal Phys...

    doi

  17. [25]

    Zhang , author A

    author author Q. Zhang , author A. V. \ Nurmikko , author A. Anguelouch , author G. Xiao , \ and\ author A. Gupta ,\ title title Coherent magnetization rotation and phase control by ultrashort optical pulses in cro _ 2 thin films , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.177402 journal journ...

    doi

  18. [26]

    Vomir , author L

    author author M. Vomir , author L. H. F. \ Andrade , author L. Guidoni , author E. Beaurepaire , \ and\ author J.-Y. \ Bigot ,\ title title Real space trajectory of the ultrafast magnetization dynamics in ferromagnetic metals , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.237601 journal journal P...

    doi

  19. [27]

    author author V. V. \ Kruglyak , author A. Barman , author R. J. \ Hicken , author J. R. \ Childress , \ and\ author J. A. \ Katine ,\ title title Picosecond magnetization dynamics in nanomagnets: Crossover to nonuniform precession , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.220409 journal journa...

    doi

  20. [28]

    author author A. V. \ Kimel , author C. D. \ Stanciu , author P. A. \ Usachev , author R. V. \ Pisarev , author V. N. \ Gridnev , author A. Kirilyuk , \ and\ author T. Rasing ,\ title title Optical excitation of antiferromagnetic resonance in tmfeo _3 , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.0...

    doi

  21. [29]

    Au , author M

    author author Y. Au , author M. Dvornik , author T. Davison , author E. Ahmad , author P. S. \ Keatley , author A. Vansteenkiste , author B. Van Waeyenberge , \ and\ author V. V. \ Kruglyak ,\ title title Direct excitation of propagating spin waves by focused ultrashort optica...

    doi

  22. [30]

    \ Yun , author C.-G

    author author S.-J. \ Yun , author C.-G. \ Cho , \ and\ author S.-B. \ Choe ,\ title title Simultaneous excitation of two different spinwave modes by optical ultrafast demagnetization , \ 10.7567/APEX.8.063009 journal journal App. Phys. Exp. \ volume 8 ,\ pages 063009 ( year 2...

    doi

  23. [31]

    Iihama , author Y

    author author S. Iihama , author Y. Sasaki , author A. Sugihara , author A. Kamimaki , author Y. Ando , \ and\ author S. Mizukami ,\ title title Quantification of a propagating spin-wave-packet created by an ultrashort laser pulse in a thin film of magnetic metal , \ 10.1103/P...

    doi

  24. [32]

    Kamimaki , author S

    author author A. Kamimaki , author S. Iihama , author Y. Sasaki , author Y. Ando , \ and\ author S. Mizukami ,\ title title Reciprocal excitation of propagating spin waves by a laser pulse and their reciprocal mapping in magnetic metal films , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.014438 jour...

    doi

  25. [33]

    author author A. V. \ Kimel , author A. Kirilyuk , author P. A. \ Usachev , author R. V. \ Pisarev , author A. M. \ Balbashov , \ and\ author T. Rasing ,\ title title Ultrafast non-thermal control of magnetization by instantaneous photomagnetic pulses. \ 10.1038/nature03564 jo...

    doi

  26. [34]

    Satoh , author Y

    author author T. Satoh , author Y. Terui , author R. Moriya , author B. A. \ Ivanov , author K. Ando , author E. Saitoh , author T. Shimura , \ and\ author K. Kuroda ,\ title title Directional control of spin-wave emission by spatially shaped light , \ 10.1038/nphoton.2012.218...

    doi

  27. [35]

    Deb , author M

    author author M. Deb , author M. Vomir , author J. L. \ Rehspringer , \ and\ author J. Y. \ Bigot ,\ title title Ultrafast optical control of magnetization dynamics in polycrystalline bismuth doped iron garnet thin films , \ 10.1063/1.4938538 journal journal App. Phys. Lett. \...

    doi

  28. [36]

    Bossini , author S

    author author D. Bossini , author S. Dal Conte , author Y. Hashimoto , author A. Secchi , author R. V. \ Pisarev , author T. Rasing , author G. Cerullo , \ and\ author A. V. \ Kimel ,\ title title Macrospin dynamics in antiferromagnets triggered by sub-20 femtosecond injection...

    doi

  29. [37]

    Hansteen , author A

    author author F. Hansteen , author A. Kimel , author A. Kirilyuk , \ and\ author T. Rasing ,\ title title Nonthermal ultrafast optical control of the magnetization in garnet films , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.014421 journal journal Phys. Rev. B. \ volume 73 ,\ pages 014421 ( year 2...

    doi

  30. [38]

    Berk , author F

    author author C. Berk , author F. Ganss , author M. Jaris , author M. Albrecht , \ and\ author H. Schmidt ,\ title title All-optical multi-pulse pump-probe method for selective control of magnetization precessions in magnetic multilayers , \ 10.1109/JSTQE.2019.2899779 journal ...

  31. [39]

    J \" a ckl , author V

    author author M. J \" a ckl , author V. Belotelov , author I. Akimov , author I. Savochkin , author D. Yakovlev , author A. Zvezdin , \ and\ author M. Bayer ,\ title title Magnon Accumulation by Clocked Laser Excitation as Source of Long-Range Spin Waves in Transparent Magneti...

    doi

  32. [40]

    author author I. V. \ Savochkin , author M. J \" a ckl , author V. I. \ Belotelov , author I. A. \ Akimov , author M. A. \ Kozhaev , author D. A. \ Sylgacheva , author A. I. \ Chernov , author A. N. \ Shaposhnikov , author A. R. \ Prokopov , author V. N. \ Berzhansky , author ...

    doi

  33. [41]

    Atxitia , author O

    author author U. Atxitia , author O. Chubykalo-Fesenko , author J. Walowski , author A. Mann , \ and\ author M. M \" u nzenberg ,\ title title Evidence for thermal mechanisms in laser-induced femtosecond spin dynamics , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.174401 journal journal Phys. Rev. B...

    doi

  34. [42]

    Mendil , author P

    author author J. Mendil , author P. Nieves , author O. Chubykalo-Fesenko , author J. Walowski , author T. Santos , author S. Pisana , \ and\ author M. M \" u nzenberg ,\ title title Resolving the role of femtosecond heated electrons in ultrafast spin dynamics , \ 10.1038/srep0...

    doi

  35. [43]

    Sebastian , author K

    author author T. Sebastian , author K. Schultheiss , author B. Obry , author B. Hillebrands , \ and\ author H. Schultheiss ,\ title title Micro-focused Brillouin light scattering: imaging spin waves at the nanoscale , \ 10.3389/fphy.2015.00035 journal journal Frontiers in Phys...

  36. [44]

    V ansteenkiste , author J

    author author A. V ansteenkiste , author J. L eliaert , author M. D vornik , author M. H elsen , author F. G arcia S anchez , \ and\ author B. V an W aeyenberge ,\ title title T he design and verification of M u M ax3 , \ http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4899186 journal journal AIP...

    doi

  37. [45]

    Dzyapko , author I

    author author O. Dzyapko , author I. Lisenkov , author P. Nowik-Boltyk , author V. E. \ Demidov , author S. O. \ Demokritov , author B. Koene , author A. Kirilyuk , author T. Rasing , author V. Tiberkevich , \ and\ author A. Slavin ,\ title title Magnon-magnon interactions in ...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.