Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 39 references

Entropic curvature and convergence to equilibrium for mean-field dynamics on discrete spaces

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Positive entropic Ricci curvature forces exponential convergence to a unique equilibrium for mean-field dynamics on finite discrete state spaces.

desk verdict A serious and mostly right paper, but the bridge from the Bochner check to geodesic convexity rests on a Lemma 3.8 that does not parse as written; fix that and this becomes the standard reference for nonlinear discrete entropic curvature. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03397 v1 pith:NS5X3V7C submitted 2019-08-09 math.PR math-phmath.MP

Matthias Erbar , Max Fathi , André Schlichting This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath-phmath.MP MSC 60J2760K3549Q22
keywords entropicRiccicurvaturemean-fielddynamicsdiscretestatespacesgradientflowmodifiedlogarithmicSobolevinequalitytransport-entropyCurie-Weissmodelzero-rangeprocess
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a curvature-based route to quantitative long-time behavior for mean-field dynamics on finite discrete state spaces. The central claim is that a lower bound $\mathrm{Ric}(X,Q,\pi) \ge \lambda > 0$ on the entropic Ricci curvature—defined as geodesic convexity of the free energy in a specially adapted discrete transport distance—has strong consequences: the system has a unique stationary state, it satisfies a modified logarithmic Sobolev inequality, and every solution decays exponentially to equilibrium in free energy. The result matters because it transfers the successful gradient-flow strategy via quadratic transport distances for continuous mean-field equations to the discrete setting, where the usual Wasserstein distance degenerates. The paper backs the abstract theorem with explicit curvature computations for the Curie–Weiss model and for separable zero-range/misanthrope-type rates, showing the hypotheses are satisfied by classical statistical-mechanics examples.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing structure is the non-linear Markov triple of Assumption 2.1: for every probability measure $\mu$ on the finite state space $X$, the rate matrix $Q(\mu)$ is reversible with respect to a Gibbs measure $\pi(\mu) = Z(\mu)^{-1}\exp(-H(\mu))$, where $H_x(\mu) = \partial_{\mu_x} U(\mu)$ and $U(\mu)=\sum_x \mu_x K_x(\mu)$. This detailed-balance condition produces the Onsager operator built from the logarithmic mean $\Lambda(a,b)=(a-b)/(\log a-\log b)$, and hence the discrete transport distance $W$ defined through the continuity equation $\partial_t\mu + \nabla\cdot(\Lambda(\mu)\nabla\psi)=0$ with action $A(\mu,\psi)=\langle\nabla\psi,\Lambda(\mu)\nabla\psi\rangle$. The free energy $F(\mu)=\sum_x \mu_x\log\mu_x+U(\mu)$ is then the driving functional of the gradient flow, and the paper defines Ricci curvature $\mathrm{Ric}(X,Q,\pi)\ge\kappa$ by geodesic convexity of $F$: $F(\mu_t) \le (1-t)F(\mu_0)+tF(\mu_1) - (\kappa/2)t(1-t)W(\mu_0,\mu_1)^2$. The central technical engine is Theorem 3.7, which equates this geodesic-convexity condition with the Bochner-type Hessian inequality $B(\mu,\psi) \ge \kappa A(\mu,\psi)$ and with the evolution-variational inequality $\mathrm{EVI}_\kappa$; all subsequent functional inequalities flow from that equivalence.

What would settle it

Directly compute the infimum defining the optimal curvature, $\kappa_{\mathrm{opt}} = \inf_{\mu,\psi} B(\mu,\psi)/A(\mu,\psi)$, for a candidate non-linear Markov triple; the theorem's key condition is exactly that this infimum is positive. The claim would be falsified by a positive-infimum example that nonetheless has two stationary points or a trajectory whose free energy decays slower than $e^{-2\kappa_{\mathrm{opt}}t}$; such an example could be sought among separable zero-range kernels by solving the two-point system, where the formula in Lemma 3.9 gives $\kappa_{\mathrm{opt}}$ explicitly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's own claim, stated as Theorem 4.3 (and announced in Theorem 1.2), is that every non-linear Markov triple $(X,Q,\pi)$ satisfying Assumption 2.1 with $\mathrm{Ric}(X,Q,\pi) \ge \lambda > 0$ has exactly one stationary point $\pi_*$, which is the unique minimizer of the free energy, and the following quantitative controls hold: the modified logarithmic Sobolev inequality $F_*(\mu) \le I(\mu)/(2\lambda)$ for all $\mu$; exponential free-energy decay $F_*(\mu_t) \le e^{-2\lambda t}F_*(\mu_0)$ along every solution of the mean-field equation; and the transport-entropy inequality $W(\mu,\pi_*) \le \sqrt{2/\lambda}\,F_*(\mu)$. These are the discrete, non-linear analogues of the functional-inequality route that works for continuous mean-field equations and for linear reversible Markov chains, and they are derived by a short chain: curvature gives an evolution-variational inequality, which gives a free-energy–Fisher-information–distance inequality, which gives the modified log-Sobolev bound and then the decay and transport bounds. The paper also computes curvature for representative models, obtaining $\kappa = 2(1-\beta)$ for the Curie–Weiss model with Glauber rates (positive curvature on the entire high-temperature phase $\beta < 1$) and a perturbative positive bound for separable zero-range and misanthrope kernels on the complete graph.

Load-bearing premise

Everything depends on Assumption 2.1: for every possible state $\mu$ of the system, the jump rates $Q(\mu)$ must be reversible with respect to the Gibbs measure $\pi(\mu)$ whose Hamiltonian is derived from the potential $U$, so the dynamics has a detailed-balance structure; if a mean-field dynamics lacks this structure, the transport distance, the free energy, and the curvature criterion are not defined.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A positive curvature bound $\lambda > 0$ rules out multiple equilibria: $\pi_*$ is the unique stationary state and the unique minimizer of the free energy.
  • The modified logarithmic Sobolev inequality $F_*(\mu) \le I(\mu)/(2\lambda)$ holds, so entropy dissipation controls free energy uniformly over the state space.
  • Every solution of the mean-field equation satisfies $F_*(\mu_t) \le e^{-2\lambda t}F_*(\mu_0)$, so convergence to equilibrium is exponential with explicit rate $2\lambda$.
  • The transport-entropy inequality $W(\mu,\pi_*) \le \sqrt{2/\lambda}\,F_*(\mu)$ holds, linking the discrete transport distance to free energy; in particular $W(\mu_t,\pi_*)$ decays at rate $\lambda$.
  • Two solutions starting from different initial data contract exponentially in $W$: $W(\mu^1_t,\mu^2_t) \le e^{-\kappa t}W(\mu^1_0,\mu^2_0)$, and the Curie–Weiss example shows the whole high-temperature regime $\beta<1$ is covered, with $\kappa = 2(1-\beta)$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the paper leaves implicit: because the Bochner-type inequality $B(\mu,\psi)\ge\kappa A(\mu,\psi)$ is a finite-dimensional condition in $(\mu,\psi)$ for each fixed state space, the optimal curvature of any detailed-balance mean-field model can be computed or bounded by a finite-dimensional infimum problem, giving a direct recipe for other models.
  • The zero-range/misanthrope result is perturbative in the size of the rate perturbation; a natural extension is to ask whether positivity of the same curvature functional, rather than smallness of the perturbation, is the actual threshold for exponential decay in those models.
  • The framework is restricted to reversible, Gibbs-structured mean-field dynamics by Assumption 2.1; for non-reversible mean-field limits the Onsager operator and the distance $W$ are not available, so a different metric or curvature notion would be needed to obtain analogous quantitative rates.
  • Because the consequences are derived from convexity in $W$ rather than from spectral data, the method could yield transport-entropy inequalities for models whose equilibrium measure is not known explicitly, as long as the Hessian functional can be bounded.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a notion of entropic Ricci curvature lower bounds for nonlinear mean-field Markov dynamics on finite discrete state spaces, based on geodesic convexity of a free energy F with respect to a discrete transportation distance W coming from the authors' earlier gradient-flow work. Under a positive curvature bound, it derives uniqueness of the stationary state and three quantitative consequences: a modified logarithmic Sobolev inequality, exponential decay of the free energy along solutions, and a transport-entropy inequality. The technical core is a Hessian formula B(mu,psi) for F along W-geodesics, with curvature characterized by a Bochner-type inequality B >= kappa A. Explicit curvature bounds are given for the Curie-Weiss model with Glauber rates (kappa = 2(1-beta) for beta in [0,1]) and, perturbatively, for separable zero-range and misanthrope rates.

Significance. If the bridge theorem (Theorem 3.7) is fully established, this is a valuable extension of the Erbar-Maas curvature theory to nonlinear mean-field systems on discrete spaces. The proofs of the functional-inequality consequences (Theorems 4.2 and 4.3) are clean and self-contained conditional on that bridge, and the Curie-Weiss computation is internally consistent: the regime beta in [0,1] is exactly where the estimate 1/(1-x^2) >= beta validates the lower bound. The perturbative zero-range/misanthrope result provides explicit, parameter-free curvature constants and goes beyond the linear Markov-chain setting. These strengths make the paper potentially publishable, but the central implication currently rests on an unproven and internally inconsistent lemma.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3, Lemma 3.8] The statement of Lemma 3.8 is internally inconsistent in a way that affects the central implication. The lemma says that mu^s_t is the solution 'at time s+t' starting from mu^s, but the proof begins by asserting that partial_t mu^s_t = s * hat{L}_{mu^s_t} mu^s_t and uses this factor s in equation (3.9). For the standard (unscaled) nonlinear semigroup the time derivative is hat{L}_{mu^s_t} mu^s_t with no factor s; the factor s is correct for the rescaled curve mu^s_t = Phi_{s t}(mu^s). Since Theorem 3.7 is the bridge between the geodesic-convexity definition of curvature (Definition 3.1) and the Bochner inequality B(mu,psi) >= kappa A(mu,psi) that is verified in all examples, and since its proof is delegated to [21, Thm. 4.5] with Lemma 3.8 as the replacement for [21, Lem. 4.6], the main results of Section 4 and the example bounds of Section 5 are not currently supported as written. Please correct the time rescaling in the statement and supply the full argument, or an explicit dictionary that verifies the nonlinear adaptation.
  2. [Section 3, Theorem 3.7] The proof of Theorem 3.7 is not supplied; the text says to follow verbatim the proof of [21, Thm. 4.5] with Lemma 3.8 replacing [21, Lem. 4.6]. The nonlinear setting is not a notational variant of the linear one: the geodesic equation (3.1) contains the extra derivative term partial_{mu(z)} of Lambda, the Hessian B in (3.7) contains the new terms R_Lambda and M, and the text itself notes that the equivalence of (1) and (2) is nontrivial because the metric degenerates at the boundary. Without a proof that the Daneri-Savare argument goes through with these modifications, the example computations in Section 5 only verify the Bochner inequality, not the geodesic convexity that Definition 3.1 requires. Please include a complete proof or a detailed step-by-step reduction to the linear case.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.1] The set P*(X) is used in (2.9), Lemma 3.6, and Theorem 3.7 but is never defined; please define it explicitly as the interior of the simplex, i.e. the set of strictly positive probability measures.
  2. [Section 5.2] The text calls d = |X| the constant degree of the complete graph; with p(x,y) = 1 for x != y the degree is |X|-1. Please clarify the normalization, since the numerical constants in Theorem 5.3 depend on this convention.
  3. [Section 5.3 / Theorem 5.3] The symbol lambda is used both for the bound defined in (5.5) and for the splitting parameter in the proof's conclusion; please use different notation for the splitting parameter to avoid the appearance of a circular definition.
  4. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including 'analize' in Section 1.1, 'orrepsond' in Section 1.1, 'correponds' in Remark 3.3, and 'F WI' in Theorem 4.2; a careful proofreading pass is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derived functional inequalities are consequences of the curvature lower bound, and the example curvature bounds are direct estimates with no fitted constants.

full rationale

The paper's claimed derivation chain is: Assumption 2.1 plus the gradient-flow structure from [19] define a distance W and free energy F; Definition 3.1 defines Ric >= kappa as geodesic convexity of F; Lemma 3.6 computes the second variation as B; Theorem 3.7 (intended as the discrete Daneri-Savare argument) connects the Bochner inequality B >= kappa A and EVI to Ric; Section 4 then derives FWI, MLSI, exponential decay, and ET as one-way consequences. None of these outputs is used as an input in the proofs: the mLSI constant is the same kappa or lambda from the curvature bound, and the example bounds in Proposition 5.1 and Theorem 5.3 are explicit lower bounds on B/A computed from the rates, not parameters fitted to the target inequalities. The self-citations [19] and [21] are to published, checkable prior work; the linear-chain theorem [21, Thm. 4.5] does not assume the nonlinear target result, so invoking it is legitimate evidence rather than circularity. One correctness caveat should be recorded separately: the proof of Theorem 3.7 is delegated to [21] with Lemma 3.8 replacing [21, Lem. 4.6], and Lemma 3.8 contains the identity partial_t mu^s_t = s times L-hat_{mu^s_t} mu^s_t without stating the time rescaling that would make the factor s correct. If that identity is wrong as printed, the bridge from B >= kappa A to Ric >= kappa is not yet established; however, that is a possible mathematical gap, not a circular reduction of outputs to inputs, and it does not increase the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on (i) the Gibbs/detailed-balance structure of Assumption 2.1 inherited from [19], (ii) the regularity and geodesic theory of the discrete transport distance W imported from [21] and [15], and (iii) the logarithmic-mean inequality from [22, Lemma A.2]. No constants are fitted to data; every curvature bound is derived from the explicit model rates. The ledger is small and standard for this research program.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.1: Q(µ) is reversible with respect to π(µ) = Z(µ)^{-1} exp(-H(µ)) with Hx(µ) = ∂µ_x U(µ) and U(µ) = Σ µx Kx(µ); K twice continuously differentiable and Q Lipschitz.
    Section 2.1 states this is 'assumed to hold throughout the article'; it guarantees the Onsager operator K[µ], the distance W, and the gradient flow structure from [19], hence the curvature definition in Section 3 has content.
  • standard math Smoothness of W-geodesics in the interior P*(X), with boundary-degeneracy handled by the Daneri-Savare argument as adapted in [21, Thm. 4.5].
    Lemmas 3.2 and 3.6 compute the geodesic equation and Hessian only in P*(X); Theorem 3.7 extends to the closed simplex by citing [21, Thm. 4.5] 'verbatim', which is an unproved import in this preprint.
  • standard math Logarithmic-mean estimate (5.12): r(∂1Λ(s,t) + ∂2Λ(s,t)) + Λ(s,t) ≥ Λ(r,s) + Λ(r,t), taken from [22, Lemma A.2].
    Used in Section 5.2 to estimate term I in the curvature bound for separable kernels; the direction of the inequality is load-bearing for the lower bound on B(µ,ψ).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Entropic curvature and convergence to equilibrium for mean-field dynamics on discrete spaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NS5X3V7C

@misc{pith2026190803397,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Entropic curvature and convergence to equilibrium for mean-field dynamics on discrete spaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NS5X3V7C}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03397}
}
read the original abstract

We consider non-linear evolution equations arising from mean-field limits of particle systems on discrete spaces. We investigate a notion of curvature bounds for these dynamics based on convexity of the free energy along interpolations in a discrete transportation distance related to the gradient flow structure of the dynamics. This notion extends the one for linear Markov chain dynamics studied by Erbar and Maas. We show that positive curvature bounds entail several functional inequalities controlling the convergence to equilibrium of the dynamics. We establish explicit curvature bounds for several examples of mean-field limits of various classical models from statistical mechanics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [21]

    Ricci Curvature of Finite M arkov Chains via Convexity of the Entropy

    Matthias Erbar and Jan Maas. Ricci Curvature of Finite M arkov Chains via Convexity of the Entropy. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , 206(3):997–1038, August 2012

    work page 2012

  2. [22]

    Entropic Ricci curvature bounds for discrete interacting systems

    Max Fathi and Jan Maas. Entropic Ricci curvature bounds for discrete interacting systems. Ann. Appl. Probab., 26(3):1774–1806, 2016

    work page 2016

  3. [25]

    Entropy dissipation estimates for inhomogeneous zero-range processes

    Jonathan Hermon and Justin Salez. Entropy dissipation estimates for inhomogeneous zero-range processes. arxiv preprint, 2019

    work page 2019

  4. [26]

    A large deviation perspective on exponential decay of entropy and lower bounds on the Ricci-curvature

    Richard Kraaij. A large deviation perspective on expon ential decay of entropy and lower bounds on the ricci-curvature. arXiv:1609.09637, 2016

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  5. [39]

    Lower bound for the coarse Ricci curvature of continuous-time pure jump processes

    Denis Villemonais. Lower bound for the coarse Ricci cur vature of continuous-time pure jump pro- cesses. arXiv:1705.06642, 2017. Insitut f ¨ur Angew ande Mathematik, Endenicher Allee 60, Universit ¨at Bonn E-mail address : erbar@iam.uni-bonn.de CNRS & Institut de Math ´ematiques de Toulouse, Universit ´e de Toulouse, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse,...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  6. [1]

    Diffusions hypercontractives

    Dominique Bakry and Michel ´Emery. Diffusions hypercontractives. In S´ eminaire de probabilit´ es, XIX, 1983/84 , volume 1123 of Lecture Notes in Math. , pages 177–206. Springer, Berlin, 1985

    work page 1983

  7. [2]

    A kinetic equation for granular media

    Dario Benedetto, Emanuele Caglioti, and Mario Pulviren ti. A kinetic equation for granular media. RAIRO Mod´ el. Math. Anal. Num´ er., 31(5):615–641, 1997

    work page 1997

  8. [3]

    Unif orm convergence to equilibrium for granular media

    Fran¸ cois Bolley, Ivan Gentil, and Arnaud Guillin. Unif orm convergence to equilibrium for granular media. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 208(2):429–445, 2013

    work page 2013

Show all 39 references
  1. [4]

    Limits of relative entropies associated with weakly interacting particle systems

    Amarjit Budhiraja, Paul Dupuis, Markus Fischer, and Kav ita Ramanan. Limits of relative entropies associated with weakly interacting particle systems. Electron. J. Probab. , 20:no. 80, 22, 2015. CUR V ATURE FOR DISCRETE MEAN-FIELD DYNAMICS 25

    2015

  2. [5]

    Local stability of Kol- mogorov forward equations for finite state nonlinear Markov processes

    Amarjit Budhiraja, Paul Dupuis, Markus Fischer, and Kav ita Ramanan. Local stability of Kol- mogorov forward equations for finite state nonlinear Markov processes. Electron. J. Probab. , 20:no. 81, 30, 2015

    2015

  3. [6]

    Convex e ntropy decay via the Bochner-Bakry- Emery approach

    Pietro Caputo, Paolo Dai Pra, and Gustavo Posta. Convex e ntropy decay via the Bochner-Bakry- Emery approach. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat. , 45(3):734–753, 2009

    2009

  4. [7]

    Entropy dissipation es timates in a zero-range dynamics

    Pietro Caputo and Gustavo Posta. Entropy dissipation es timates in a zero-range dynamics. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 139(1-2):65–87, 2007

    2007

  5. [8]

    J. A. Carrillo, R. S. Gvalani, G. A. Pavliotis, and A. Schl ichting. Long-time behaviour and phase transitions for the mckean–vlasov equation on the torus. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Anal- ysis, Jul 2019

    2019

  6. [9]

    Carrillo, Robert J

    Jos´ e A. Carrillo, Robert J. McCann, and C´ edric Villani . Kinetic equilibration rates for granular media and related equations: entropy dissipation and mass t ransportation estimates. Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana, 19(3):971–1018, 2003

    2003

  7. [10]

    Carrillo, Robert J

    Jos´ e A. Carrillo, Robert J. McCann, and C´ edric Villan i. Contractions in the 2-Wasserstein length space and thermalization of granular media. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 179(2):217–263, 2006

    2006

  8. [11]

    Stochastic Cucker–Smale models: Old and new

    Patrick Cattiaux, Fanny Delebecque, and Laure P´ ed` ec hes. Stochastic Cucker–Smale models: Old and new. Ann. Appl. Probab. , 28(5):3239–3286, 2018

    2018

  9. [12]

    Probabilistic approach for granular media equations in the non-uniformly convex case

    Patrick Cattiaux, Arnaud Guillin, and Florent Malrieu . Probabilistic approach for granular media equations in the non-uniformly convex case. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 140(1-2):19–40, 2008

    2008

  10. [13]

    Fokke r-Planck equations for a free energy functional or Markov process on a graph

    Shui-Nee Chow, Wen Huang, Yao Li, and Haomin Zhou. Fokke r-Planck equations for a free energy functional or Markov process on a graph. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 203(3):969–1008, 2012

    2012

  11. [14]

    Processus des misanthro pes

    Christiane Cocozza-Thivent. Processus des misanthro pes. Zeitschrift f¨ ur Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete , 70(4):509–523, 1985

    1985

  12. [15]

    Eulerian calculus fo r the displacement convexity in the Wasser- stein distance

    Sara Daneri and Giuseppe Savar´ e. Eulerian calculus fo r the displacement convexity in the Wasser- stein distance. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 40(3):1104–1122, 2008

    2008

  13. [16]

    Macroscopic models of collective motion and self-organization

    Pierre Degond, Amic Frouvelle, Jian-Guo Liu, Sebastie n Motsch, and Laurent Navoret. Macroscopic models of collective motion and self-organization. In S´ eminaire Laurent Schwartz— ´Equations aux d´ eriv´ ees partielles et applications. Ann´ ee 2012–2013, S´ emin. ´Equ. D´ eri...

    2012

  14. [17]

    Reflection couplings and contraction r ates for diffusions

    Andreas Eberle. Reflection couplings and contraction r ates for diffusions. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 166(3-4):851–886, 2016

    2016

  15. [18]

    Qu antitative Harris type theorems for dif- fusions and McKean-Vlasov processes

    Andreas Eberle, Arnaud Guillin, and Raphael Zimmer. Qu antitative Harris type theorems for dif- fusions and McKean-Vlasov processes. To appear in Transactions AMS , 2016

    2016

  16. [19]

    Gradient flow structure for McKean-Vlasov equations on discrete spaces

    Matthias Erbar, Max Fathi, Vaios Laschos, and Andr´ e Sc hlichting. Gradient flow structure for McKean-Vlasov equations on discrete spaces. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. , 36(12):6799–6833, 2016

    2016

  17. [20]

    Ricci curvature bounds for weakly interacting Markov chains

    Matthias Erbar, Christopher Henderson, Georg Menz, an d Prasad Tetali. Ricci curvature bounds for weakly interacting Markov chains. Electron. J. Probab. , 22:Paper No. 40, 23, 2017

    2017

  18. [23]

    Derivation of mean-field equations for sto- chastic particle systems

    Stefan Grosskinsky and Watthanan Jatuviriyapornchai . Derivation of mean-field equations for sto- chastic particle systems. Stoch. Process. their Appl. , 129(4):1455–1475, 2019

    2019

  19. [24]

    Cutoff for the mean-fie ld zero-range process with bounded monotone rates

    Jonathan Hermon and Justin Salez. Cutoff for the mean-fie ld zero-range process with bounded monotone rates. to appear in Ann. Probab. , 2018

    2018

  20. [27]

    Thomas M. Liggett. Interacting Particle Systems . Springer, 2004

    2004

  21. [28]

    Ricci curvature for metr ic-measure spaces via optimal transport

    John Lott and C´ edric Villani. Ricci curvature for metr ic-measure spaces via optimal transport. Ann. of Math. (2) , 169(3):903–991, 2009. 26 MATTHIAS ERBAR, MAX F ATHI, AND ANDR ´E SCHLICHTING

    2009

  22. [29]

    Gradient flows of the entropy for finite Markov c hains

    Jan Maas. Gradient flows of the entropy for finite Markov c hains. Journal of Functional Analysis , 261(8):2250–2292, 2011

    2011

  23. [30]

    Logarithmic sobolev inequalities in d iscrete product spaces: a proof by a trans- portation cost distance

    Katalin Marton. Logarithmic sobolev inequalities in d iscrete product spaces: a proof by a trans- portation cost distance. arxiv preprint, 2015

    2015

  24. [31]

    Geodesic convexity of the relative e ntropy in reversible Markov chains

    Alexander Mielke. Geodesic convexity of the relative e ntropy in reversible Markov chains. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations , 48(1-2):1–31, 2013

    2013

  25. [32]

    The geometry of dissipative evolution equa tions: the porous medium equation

    Felix Otto. The geometry of dissipative evolution equa tions: the porous medium equation. Commu- nications in Partial Differential Equations , 26(1-2):101–174, January 2001

    2001

  26. [33]

    Generalization of an In equality by Talagrand and Links with the Logarithmic Sobolev Inequality

    Felix Otto and C´ edric Villani. Generalization of an In equality by Talagrand and Links with the Logarithmic Sobolev Inequality. Journal of Functional Analysis , 173(2):361–400, June 2000

    2000

  27. [34]

    The exchange-driven growth model : basic properties and longtime behavior

    Andr´ e Schlichting. The exchange-driven growth model : basic properties and longtime behavior. arXiv:1811.05954, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  28. [35]

    On the geometry of metric measure s paces

    Karl-Theodor Sturm. On the geometry of metric measure s paces. I and II. Acta Math. , 196(1):65– 131, 2006

    2006

  29. [36]

    Topics in propagation of chaos

    Alain-Sol Sznitman. Topics in propagation of chaos. In ´Ecole d’ ´Et´ e de Probabilit´ es de Saint-Flour XIX—1989 , volume 1464 of Lecture Notes in Math. , pages 165–251. Springer, Berlin, 1991

    1989

  30. [37]

    G. Teschl. Ordinary Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems . Graduate Studies in Mathemat- ics. American Mathematical Soc

  31. [38]

    Convergence to the equilibria for self- stabilizing processes in double-well landscape

    Julian Tugaut. Convergence to the equilibria for self- stabilizing processes in double-well landscape. Ann. Probab., 41(3A):1427–1460, 2013

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.