Transport across a topoelectrical Weyl semimetal heterojunction

Mansoor B.A. Jalil; S M Rafi-Ul-Islam; Zhuo Bin Siu

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 48 references

Transport across a topoelectrical Weyl semimetal heterojunction

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A capacitor-inductor network mimics a Weyl heterojunction and shows 'anti-Klein' tunneling: some valleys are totally blocked at normal incidence, the reverse of Klein tunneling.

desk verdict A useful circuit-platform proposal whose anti-Klein tunneling argument is clear and plausible, but whose quantitative 3D transmission results need to be written out before the claims are fully checkable. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03642 v1 pith:EHTZ3KR2 submitted 2019-08-09 cond-mat.mes-hall

S M Rafi-Ul-Islam , Zhuo Bin Siu , Mansoor B.A. Jalil This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mes-hall PACS 72.10.-d73.23.-b

keywords topoelectricalcircuitsWeylsemimetalheterojunctionanti-KleintunnelingTypeIIIphaseenergyfluxvalley-selectivetransmissiontight-bindinganalogue

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a lattice of capacitors and inductors — a 'topoelectrical' circuit network — can stand in for a Weyl semimetal, a quantum material whose electrons disperse like massless particles, and can join two different Weyl phases at a clean interface that real materials cannot easily form. The authors show that the energy flux flowing through such a circuit is the exact analogue of the probability flux of electrons in a tight-binding model, so a transmission coefficient computed from circuit voltages is a genuine transport prediction. They then predict that transmission across a Weyl heterojunction is controlled by the angle between the transport direction and the tilt of the Weyl cones: perpendicular alignment transmits all valleys equally, while parallel alignment forces inter-valley scattering and valley-dependent transmission. The paper's headline result is an 'anti-Klein' tunneling effect at a Type I to Type III interface, where transmission is completely suppressed for some valleys at normal incidence — the precise opposite of the perfect transmission of Klein tunneling. If the predictions hold, cheap tabletop circuits become a testing ground for heterojunction physics that is virtually impossible to realize in actual Weyl materials.

What carries the argument

The machine that carries the argument is the topoelectrical analogue: a voltage node in an LC network maps to a tight-binding lattice site, a coupling capacitor maps to a hopping integral, the common grounding capacitance $C$ maps to the eigenenergy, and the energy flux $j_{E;n} = \frac{1}{\omega}\operatorname{Im}(C_{n+1;n}V_{n+1}^*V_n)$ maps to probability flux. The Type III phase is engineered by the condition $|C_{Az}+C_{Bz}| = |C_{Az}-C_{Bz}|$, which in the explicit model means $C_{Bz} = 0$; the Weyl cone then has one flat branch along the tilt direction, so the drain supports only one pseudospin species. The anti-Klein suppression follows from pseudospin orthogonality: at normal incidence the source mode from the negative-$k_z$ valley has $\langle\sigma_z\rangle = -1$ while every forward-propagating drain mode has $\langle\sigma_z\rangle = +1$, so the overlap vanishes. The transmission calculation is made finite and tractable by truncating the infinite leads to a few nodes with voltage supplies at the ends, justified through an analogy with lead self-energies.

What would settle it

Build or numerically simulate the paper's Type I–Type III junction with the stated parameters (e.g., $C_1 = 0.716$ mF, $C_y = 0.167$ mF, $C_{Az} = 0.5$ mF, $C_{Bz} = 0$) and measure or compute the transmitted energy flux at normal incidence for the negative-$k_z$ valley; the anti-Klein claim requires this transmission to be exactly zero. A decisive control is to add extra buffer nodes beyond the three used on each side of the interface — if the zero transmission shifts or becomes nonzero, the effect is an artifact of the finite-circuit truncation. A physical measurement only requires voltmeters on adjacent nodes plus the flux formula $j_{E;n}$, so the prediction is directly checkable.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a three-dimensional LC circuit network hosts all three Weyl phases and computes their transport: writing Kirchhoff's current law at every node gives $C\mathbf{v} = H\mathbf{v}$, so the common grounding capacitance $C$ plays the role of eigenenergy, the node voltages play the wavefunction, and the conserved quantity $j_{E;n} = \frac{1}{\omega}\operatorname{Im}(C_{n+1;n}V_{n+1}^*V_n)$ is the analogue of probability flux. For a Type I source and Type II drain, the authors find that transmission is valley-independent when the tilt is perpendicular to the transport direction, and strongly valley-dependent when they are parallel, because the latter case requires large inter-valley momentum transfer. They identify a Type III phase at the Type I–II boundary, $|C_{Az}+C_{Bz}| = |C_{Az}-C_{Bz}|$, where one pseudospin branch has zero group velocity along the tilt direction and is flat in $k_z$. At a Type I–Type III junction, normally incident modes from the negative-$k_z$ valleys are completely blocked because the source and drain pseudospin states are orthogonal — the 'anti-Klein' tunneling that inverts the usual Klein result.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that cutting the infinite or semi-infinite leads down to a small finite circuit — with voltage supplies at the ends supplying the missing currents — reproduces the transmission of the true infinite system; the paper argues this via a buffering argument in Section II.C (Eqs. 16–23) but does not prove the absence of spurious reflections from the finite boundaries.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A Type I–Type II heterojunction in a TE circuit is a tunable valley filter: transmission is valley-selective when transport is parallel to the tilt direction and valley-blind when perpendicular.
The Type III phase should appear in a real circuit as a distinctive signature — equal-capacitance contours forming only two curves and a flat dispersion along the tilt direction — measurable with simple voltage probes.
The anti-Klein zero at normal incidence gives a transport fingerprint that experimentally distinguishes a Type III drain from a Type II drain without band-structure measurements.
Since the circuit is built from off-the-shelf capacitors and inductors, the entire predicted transmission map, including the anti-Klein suppression, is directly testable on a printed circuit board.
The single-mode population achieved by setting terminal voltages isolates one incident channel, so the predicted valley-dependent transmission can be measured channel by channel, which is difficult in real Weyl materials.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same tilt-plus-flat-branch band structure exists in photonic and mechanical metamaterials, so the anti-Klein mechanism should transfer there; if it does, it is a generic feature of Type I–Type III interfaces rather than a circuit-specific quirk.
A numerical stress test is cheap: recompute the transmission with four, five, or more buffer nodes on each side of the interface; if the normal-incidence zero moves or disappears, the finite-circuit truncation, not physics, produced the anti-Klein effect.
A real conductance measurement would sum over all Fermi-surface channels, not a single mode; the authors' focus on one incident mode (at $k_x = \pi$) leaves open whether the anti-Klein suppression survives an angular average over the source Fermi surface.
If the effect survives, a Type I–Type III junction is effectively a normally-off valve controlled by the valley polarization of injected modes, a possible element for valleytronic logic.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: the paper is worth taking seriously, but the numerical transmission curves currently rest on a 3D mode-matching calculation that is described by analogy rather than written down. The anti-Klein zero at normal incidence is the best part; it follows from a transparent pseudospin-overlap argument at delta kx = delta ky = 0 and would survive a re-derivation. I do not think the central physics is wrong.

What is genuinely new: applying the established TE-TB analogy to WSM heterojunctions, and the orientation-dependent valley transmission plus the Type I to Type III anti-Klein effect. The 1D derivation (Eqs. 16-23) is explicit, including the finite-circuit buffering argument and the KCL-based energy-flux analogue. The authors clearly signal the difference between the finite circuit and the semi-infinite leads, and the current-source boundary treatment is a reasonable way to set incoming and outgoing amplitudes. The pseudospin explanation of why some valleys transmit at normal incidence and others do not is also convincing.

Soft spots, in order of importance. First, every quantitative result in Sec. IV comes from a 3D mode-matching solve that is only sketched as 'similar to what we did in Eqs. 21 to 23'. No 3D equations, no statement about evanescent modes in the leads, no normalization or finite-circuit KCL count for the 3D case. The stress-test note is right: the clean 1D argument does not by itself certify the 3D numerics, especially at the Type III transition where the flat band introduces a degenerate branch. This is a reproducibility gap, not necessarily an error, but it needs to be filled. Second, the Type III phase is presented as new but it already exists in the condensed-matter literature as a type-III WSM with a flat band along the tilt direction; the citation list misses that. Third, the valley-equality claim for perpendicular transport is demonstrated for a single kx = pi slice; that is a minor limitation given the symmetry argument, but it should be stated. Fourth, the finite-circuit truncation proof is explicitly 1D; the 2D and 3D extension is asserted by analogy and deserves a more careful counting argument, though the per-node KCL logic in Sec. II.D is plausibly correct.

Who this is for: anyone working on circuit metamaterials or topological analog simulators; it is a subfield contribution, not a breakthrough. I would send it to a serious referee. The fixes are concrete: write out the 3D mode-matching, address evanescent modes, cite the type-III literature, and show at least one consistency check against a known limit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a topoelectrical (TE) circuit realization of Weyl semimetal heterojunctions. It establishes an analogy between LC circuit KCL equations and tight-binding Hamiltonians, defines a conserved energy flux as the TE analogue of probability flux, and proposes a finite-circuit construction to model semi-infinite leads. Using a two-band lattice model with tunable tilt, it classifies Type I, II, and III WSM phases and computes transmission through Type I-Type II and Type I-Type III heterojunctions, reporting valley-dependent transmission, valley-independent transmission for perpendicular tilt/transport geometry, and a new 'anti-Klein' total suppression at normal incidence for Type III drains. The 1D and 2D mode-matching derivations are explicit; the 3D transmission calculations used for the main quantitative figures are only sketched.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper offers an experimentally practical platform for WSM heterojunction transport and identifies a qualitative effect, anti-Klein tunneling, that is distinct from conventional Klein tunneling. The strengths are the explicit derivation of the energy-flux analogue (Section II.E), the careful 1D buffering argument for replacing infinite leads by finite circuits (Section II.C), and the pseudospin-overlap argument at normal incidence (Section IV, Fig. 8), which makes the anti-Klein zero plausible and testable. However, the quantitative valley-dependent and valley-equal transmission claims in Figs. 6 and 7 rest on a 3D mode-matching calculation that is not presented, and the extension of the finite-circuit equivalence to 2D/3D is asserted rather than proved.

major comments (3)

[Section IV (Figs. 6 and 7)] The transmitted energy flux is said to be calculated 'similar to what we did in Eqs. 21 to 23' (Section IV), but the 3D mode-matching equations are never written out. The paper does not provide the 3D KCL equations, the lead eigenmode expansions in all three dimensions, the interface boundary conditions, or an explicit definition of the transmission probability as a ratio of outgoing to incoming energy fluxes. Equations (26)-(27) contain only the two propagating ±κ modes, and no statement is made about whether evanescent modes are included in solving the interface problem. The quantitative results in Figs. 6 and 7, including the valley-independent transmission in Fig. 6b and the anti-Klein zeros in Fig. 7c, therefore cannot be checked by the reader. Please add the full mode-matching derivation for the WSM heterojunction, or a well-defined reduction of the 3D problem to effective 1D chains, with the transmission probability explicitly defined and normalized.
[Section II.D] The buffering argument that a finite circuit with voltage supplies at the ends reproduces the transmission of the infinite system is explicitly demonstrated only for the one-dimensional chain in Section II.C. The extension to two and three dimensions is asserted by analogy, including the sufficiency of five transverse nodes and the selection of perimeter nodes with voltage supplies in Fig. 3b. Since the 3D transmission calculations of Section IV rely on the same equivalence, the paper should either prove the equivalence for multidimensional leads or provide a numerical convergence check showing that the computed fluxes are insensitive to the transverse/truncation buffer size. Without this, spurious reflections from the finite boundaries cannot be excluded.
[Section IV and Abstract] The main results are stated without the kx=π caveat: the abstract says that for a Type I source and Type II drain all valleys transmit equally when tilt and transport are perpendicular, and the anti-Klein effect is described as a property of the heterojunction. However, Section IV states 'We therefore focus exclusively on the set of source modes with kx=π in the rest of the paper.' No argument is given that this restriction is without loss of generality for either the valley-equality claim or the anti-Klein suppression. The authors should either extend the calculation away from kx=π or explicitly qualify all conclusions as applying to the kx=π sector that the TE circuit can be prepared to excite.

minor comments (5)

[Section II.C, Eqs. (18)-(19)] Equation (18) uses Ci in the second term on the right-hand side, where the source coupling capacitance CS should appear; Eq. (19) similarly appears to use Ci instead of CD. This looks like a transcription error.
[Fig. 5 and Fig. 7] The Type II parameters are inconsistent: the main text gives CBz=0.2 mF, while the caption of Fig. 5 gives CBz=0.5 mF, and the caption of Fig. 7b refers to 'parameters in panel a' for a Type II drain, although panel a is the Type III case. Please reconcile these values and captions.
[Section IV] The term 'anti-Klein tunneling' is potentially misleading, since the effect at normal incidence is a total reflection due to the absence of a propagating pseudospin-matched drain state rather than tunneling through a classically forbidden region; a short clarifying remark would help.
[Section II.E, Eq. (38)] The phrase 'half the sum of ... and its complex conjugate' is a verbose way of saying the real part of the expression; the presentation could be simplified to improve readability.
[Figs. 6 and 7] The color scales and some axis labels in Figs. 6 and 7 are not fully identified in the captions; making the units and the boundary between source and drain regions explicit would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the anti-Klein suppression is derived from the model Hamiltonian and pseudospin overlap, not from fitted inputs or self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. It starts from KCL for an LC circuit, obtains the TE analogue C v = H v, and constructs the WSM Hamiltonian H(k) in Eq. 41 from the circuit topology. The phase classification in Eqs. 46-48 follows from expanding H around the Weyl points (Eq. 45), and the transmission is then obtained by mode matching with the conserved transverse momentum, as described after Eqs. 21-23. The anti-Klein zero at normal incidence is computed explicitly in Sec. IV: at δkx = δky = 0 and CBz = 0, Eq. 45 reduces to H = -CAz ηz δkz (I + σz), so the Type III drain has only the +σz branch, while normally incident source states from the negative kz valley have opposite pseudospin; orthogonality gives zero transmission. This is a consequence of the model, not an input. The circuit parameters (C1, Cy, CAz, CBz) are chosen, not fitted to any transmission data, and no fitted quantity is later renamed as a prediction. Self-citations to prior TE-circuit and WSM-transport work appear only as background and do not carry the derivation. The finite-circuit truncation argument in Sec. II.C is an explicit modeling assumption; even if it were incomplete in 3D, that is a verifiability/correctness concern, not a circular reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on the TE-TB analogy, the finite-chain model of leads, the specific WSM circuit construction, and the kx=pi restriction. The free parameters are chosen capacitance values that set the model, and the Type III phase is introduced without external confirmation.

free parameters (3)

Capacitance values C1, Cy, CAz for the WSM circuit = C1=0.716 mF, Cy=0.167 mF, CAz=0.5 mF (chosen)
These values are chosen to realize Type I, II, III phases and set the scale; transmission magnitudes and the precise valley dependence depend on them, though the qualitative claims are generic.
Common grounding capacitance C = C=0.1 mF in Figs. 6 and 8; scanned in Fig. 7
C is the analogue of eigenenergy and is the scan variable; transmission is plotted as a function of C, so it is not fitted but it is a chosen operating point.
Interface on-site capacitance C0I = Not specified for the WSM heterojunction
The heterojunction transmission depends on the relative on-site potentials, but the interface equation for the 3D WSM case is not given, leaving this parameter undefined.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption KCL at circuit nodes yields an eigenvalue equation for the common grounding capacitance C, making C the analogue of the TB eigenenergy
This is the central TE-TB analogy established in Section II.A and used throughout.
domain assumption A finite chain with voltage supplies at the ends models a semi-infinite lead, with the currents through the supplies acting as lead self-energies
Used in Section II.B/C to justify the truncation to three nodes on each side of the interface.
domain assumption The specific LC circuit of Fig. 4 hosts a Weyl semimetal Hamiltonian (Eq. 41) with four Weyl nodes
The circuit is designed to produce the desired WSM band structure; this is a construction, not an external fact.
standard math The reduction of higher-dimensional circuits to 1D via ky-dependent on-site terms is exact for eigenmodes
Eqs. 28-29 rely on Bloch's theorem for the transverse direction.
ad hoc to paper Transmission can be restricted to source modes with kx=pi without loss of generality for the conclusions
The valley-transmission claims are demonstrated only at kx=pi, C=0.1 mF; no general proof that other kx or C values behave the same.

invented entities (1)

Type III WSM phase
purpose: Intermediate phase between Type I and II with one flat band; used to predict anti-Klein tunneling
Defined by Eq. 48 as the critical point |CAz+CBz|=|CAz-CBz|; no comparison to prior type-III WSM literature, and no experimental evidence in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Transport across a topoelectrical Weyl semimetal heterojunction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EHTZ3KR2

@misc{pith2026190803642,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Transport across a topoelectrical Weyl semimetal heterojunction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EHTZ3KR2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03642}
}

abstract

We propose a general method to realize and calculate the transmission in a Weyl semimetal (WSM) heterostructure by employing a periodic three-dimensional topoelectrical (TE) circuit network. By drawing the analogy between inductor-capacitor circuit lattices and quantum mechanical tight-binding (TB) models, we show that the energy flux in a TE network is analogous to the probability flux in a TB Hamiltonian. TE systems offer a key advantage in that they can be easily tuned to achieve different topological WSM phases simply by varying the capacitances and inductances. The above analogy opens the way to the study of tunneling across heterojunctions separating different types of WSMs in TE circuits, a situation which is virtually impossible to realize in physical WSM materials. We show that the energy flux transmission in a WSM heterostructure depends highly on the relative orientation of the transport direction and the $k$-space tilt direction. For the transmission from a Type I WSM source lead to a Type II WSM drain lead, all valleys transmit equally when the tilt and transmission directions are perpendicular to each other. In contrast, large inter-valley scattering is required for transmission when the tilt and transport directions are parallel to each other, leading to valley-dependent transmission. We describe a Type III WSM phase intermediate between the Type I and Type II phases. An `anti-Klein' tunneling occurs between a Type I source and Type III drain where the transmission is totally suppressed for some valleys at normal incidence. This is in direct contrast to the usual Klein tunneling in Dirac materials where normally incident flux is perfectly transmitted. Owing to the ease of fabrication and experimental accessibility, TE circuits offer an excellent testbed to study the extraordinary transport phenomena in WSM based heterostructures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.03642 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** a. Schematic of a two-node circuit consisting of two voltage nodes connected to the ground via identical capacitances [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** a. Schematic of a heterojunction between a semi-infinite source lead consisting of nodes coupled to their left and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** a. A two-dimensional heterojunction between a semi-infinite source lead consisting of nodes coupled to their left and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (6 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: a. Schematic of the xy plane of a TE circuit hosting the WSM state. b. Schematic of the xz plane of the same TE circuit. The red and orange filled circles denote the A and B sublattice sites; each filled circle consists of a voltage node connected to the ground with an…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: The equal-capacitance contours of a TE circuit of Fig. 4 consisting of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The top row shows the three-dimensional schematic diagrams of the TE WSM circuits for energy flux propagation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: a. The ECCs for a C1 = 0.716 mF, Cy = 0.167 mF, CAz = 0.5 mF and CBz = 0 mF Type III WSM at kx = π (main plot), the C-dispersion relation with ky at kz = π/2 (upper right plot) and C-dispersion relation with kz at ky = π/2. The kz = π/2 and ky = π/2 planes are denoted …

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: a. and b. The ECCs and hσzi at each mode on the ECCs in the source (left) and drain (right) at C = 0.1 for a. the Type III WSM drain and b. the Type II WSM drain of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: An infinite chain consisting of voltage nodes coupled to their left and right neighbours via a coupling capacitance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

[1]

L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos and M. Solja c i\' c , Nat. Photonics 8, 821 (2014)

work page 2014
[2]

L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos and M. Solja c i\' c , Nat. Phys. 12, 626 (2016)

work page 2016
[3]

S\" u sstrunk and S

R. S\" u sstrunk and S. D. Huber, Science 349, 47 (2015)

work page 2015
[4]

D. Z. Rocklin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 116, 135503 (2016)

work page 2016
[5]

X. Li, E. Zhao and W. V. Liu, Nat. Comm. 4, 1523 (2013)

work page 2013
[6]

Goldman, J

N. Goldman, J. C. Budich and P. Zoller, Nat. Phys. 12, 639 (2016)

work page 2016
[7]

H. N. Krishnamoorthy et al., Science 336, 205 (2012)

work page 2012
[8]

Gao et al., Phys

W. Gao et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 114, 037402 (2015)

work page 2015

Show all 48 references

[9]

C. W. Peterson et al., Nat. 555, 346 (2018)

2018
[10]

Imhof et al., Nat

S. Imhof et al., Nat. Phys. 14, 925 (2018)

2018
[11]

C. H. Lee et al., Comm. Phys. 1, 39 (2018)

2018
[12]

Burkov and L

A. Burkov and L. Balents, Phys. Rev. Lett 107, 127205 (2011)

2011
[13]

Lv et al., Phys

B. Lv et al., Phys. Rev. X 5, 031013 (2015)

2015
[14]

Xu et al., Science 349, 613 (2015)

S.-Y. Xu et al., Science 349, 613 (2015)

2015
[15]

Li et al., Frontiers of Phys

Y. Li et al., Frontiers of Phys. 12, 127205 (2017)

2017
[16]

Huang et al., Phys

X. Huang et al., Phys. Rev. X 5, 031023 (2015)

2015
[17]

Wan et al., Phys

X. Wan et al., Phys. Rev. B 83, 205101 (2011)

2011
[18]

Xu et al., Science 347, 294 (2015)

S.-Y. Xu et al., Science 347, 294 (2015)

2015
[19]

Yesilyurt et al., Sci

C. Yesilyurt et al., Sci. Rep. 7, 4030 (2017)

2017
[20]

Yesilyurt et al., Sci

C. Yesilyurt et al., Sci. Rep. 6, 38862 (2016)

2016
[21]

O’Brien, M

T. O’Brien, M. Diez and C. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. Lett 116, 236401 (2016)

2016
[22]

S. A. Yang, H. Pan and F. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett 115, 156603 (2015)

2015
[23]

Yang, Y.-M

K.-Y. Yang, Y.-M. Lu and Y. Ran, Phys. Rev. B 84, 075129 (2011)

2011
[24]

Ezawa , Phys

M. Ezawa , Phys. Rev. B 87, 155415 (2013)

2013
[25]

Xu et al., Phys

G. Xu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 107, 186806 (2011)

2011
[26]

Cortijo et al., Phys

A. Cortijo et al., Phys. Rev. B 94, 241405 (2016)

2016
[27]

Chang and M.-F

M.-C. Chang and M.-F. Yang, Phys. Rev. B 91, 115203 (2015)

2015
[28]

Burkov, Nat

A. Burkov, Nat. Mater. 15, 1145 (2016)

2016
[29]

Xu et al., (unpublished) arXiv:1604.02116 (2016)

N. Xu et al., (unpublished) arXiv:1604.02116 (2016)

2016 arXiv
[30]

Xu et al., Science advances 3, (2017)

S.-Y. Xu et al., Science advances 3, (2017)

2017
[31]

Yesilyurt et al., J

C. Yesilyurt et al., J. Appl. Phys. 112, 244303 (2017)

2017
[32]

Yesilyurt et al., Appl

C. Yesilyurt et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 063101 (2017)

2017
[33]

Yesilyurt et al., Sci

C. Yesilyurt et al., Sci. Rep. 9, 4480 (2019)

2019
[34]

A. A. Soluyanov et al., Nat. 527, 495 (2015)

2015
[35]

Deng et al., Nat

K. Deng et al., Nat. Phys. 12, 1105 (2016)

2016
[36]

Kumar et al., Nat

N. Kumar et al., Nat. Comm. 8, 1642 (2017)

2017
[37]

Jiang et al., Nat

J. Jiang et al., Nat. Comm. 8, 13973 (2017)

2017
[38]

Sharma, P

G. Sharma, P. Goswami and S. Tewari, Phys. Rev. B 96, 045112 (2017)

2017
[39]

Bialynicki-Birula, Phys

I. Bialynicki-Birula, Phys. Rev. D 49, 6920 (1994)

1994
[40]

Ezawa, Phys

M. Ezawa, Phys. Rev. B 98, 201402 (2018)

2018
[41]

K. Luo, R. Yu and H. Weng, Research 2018, 6793752 (2018)

2018
[42]

Ezawa, (unpublished) arXiv:1904.03823 (2019)

M. Ezawa, (unpublished) arXiv:1904.03823 (2019)

2019 arXiv
[43]

Helbig et al., Topological band structures in electric circuits

T. Helbig et al., Topological band structures in electric circuits. Bulletin of the American Phys. Society, 2019.CHANGE MANUALLY

2019
[44]

Ridolfi et al., J

E. Ridolfi et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 27, 365501 (2015)

2015
[45]

Lu et al., Phys

Y. Lu et al., Phys. Rev. B 99, 020302 (2019)

2019
[46]

Helbig et al., Phys

T. Helbig et al., Phys. Rev. B 99, 161114 (2019)

2019
[47]

Datta, Quantum Transport: Atom to Transistor (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005), Chap

S. Datta, Quantum Transport: Atom to Transistor (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005), Chap. 9

2005
[48]

Datta and B

S. Datta and B. Das, App. Phys. Lett. 56, 665 (1990)

1990

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos and M. Solja c i\' c , Nat. Photonics 8, 821 (2014)

work page 2014

[2] [2]

L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos and M. Solja c i\' c , Nat. Phys. 12, 626 (2016)

work page 2016

[3] [3]

S\" u sstrunk and S

R. S\" u sstrunk and S. D. Huber, Science 349, 47 (2015)

work page 2015

[4] [4]

D. Z. Rocklin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 116, 135503 (2016)

work page 2016

[5] [5]

X. Li, E. Zhao and W. V. Liu, Nat. Comm. 4, 1523 (2013)

work page 2013

[6] [6]

Goldman, J

N. Goldman, J. C. Budich and P. Zoller, Nat. Phys. 12, 639 (2016)

work page 2016

[7] [7]

H. N. Krishnamoorthy et al., Science 336, 205 (2012)

work page 2012

[8] [8]

Gao et al., Phys

W. Gao et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 114, 037402 (2015)

work page 2015