Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 40 references

Origin of Stripe and Quasi-Stripe CDW Structures in Monolayer MX$ _2$ compounds: Multivalley Free Energy Landscape

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Stripe and quasi-stripe CDW phases in monolayer MX2 compounds can arise from an isotropic free-energy landscape alone, with no anisotropic interactions assumed.

desk verdict Worth a serious referee, but the central 'natural minima' claim needs an unconstrained 4D check before I believe it. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03655 v1 pith:OOIBJFBA submitted 2019-08-10 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Keiji Nakatsugawa , Satoshi Tanda , Tatsuhiko N. Ikeda This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords chargedensitywavestripephasequasi-stripeMcMillan-Nakanishi-Shibamodelmultivalleyfreeenergylandscape1T-TaS22H-TaSe2topologicaldefects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to explain why stripe-shaped and quasi-stripe (triclinic) charge-density-wave (CDW) patterns appear in monolayers of the transition-metal dichalcogenides 1T-TaS2 and 2H-TaSe2. It argues that these anisotropic domain-wall structures do not require anisotropic interactions, such as Coulomb repulsion between domain walls or inter-layer stacking. Instead, they emerge as local minima of an isotropic Ginzburg-Landau free-energy landscape, the McMillan-Nakanishi-Shiba model, once the search over CDW wave vectors is broadened beyond the usual symmetry-constrained paths. If correct, the long-standing puzzle of anisotropic CDW phases in ultrathin crystals becomes a problem of topological defect formation and harmonic interference, and the model predicts new CDW phases that experiments could look for.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the McMillan-Nakanishi-Shiba free energy, a Ginzburg-Landau functional with three complex CDW order parameters $\psi_i(\mathbf{r})$ whose wave vectors $\mathbf{Q}^{(i)}$ obey the triple-Q condition $\mathbf{Q}^{(1)}+\mathbf{Q}^{(2)}+\mathbf{Q}^{(3)}=0$. The paper searches this free energy over the full two-dimensional $\mathbf{Q}^{(1)}$ plane, including higher harmonics of the order parameter (indexed by $N$), which are essential for creating the multivalley structure: with $N=0$ the landscape is flat, while $N=1,2,3$ develop many local minima. After removing the 120° separation constraint, the local minima of the three $\mathbf{Q}^{(i)}$ form regular triangles, and that geometric condition selects anisotropic domain-wall phases (stripe vs. quasi-stripe) depending on the commensurability indices $(\mu,\nu)$ of the material.

What would settle it

Compute the same free-energy landscape with parameters obtained directly from monolayer 1T-TaS2 or 2H-TaSe2, for example from first-principles phonon calculations or measured monolayer CDW wave vectors, and check whether the regular-triangle local minima for the stripe and T phases survive when the 120° constraint is removed. A free-standing monolayer 1T-TaS2 that shows no quasi-stripe phase on heating would also contradict the central prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that anisotropic stripe and quasi-stripe CDW domain walls appear naturally, not accidentally: they are local minima of the isotropic McMillan-Nakanishi-Shiba free energy for monolayer 1T-TaS2 and 2H-TaSe2. For CDW wave vectors separated by 120°, the free-energy landscape already contains many metastable minima beyond the known incommensurate, nearly commensurate, and commensurate states. When the 120° constraint is removed, triplets of these minima form regular triangles in wave-vector space; the corresponding real-space domain walls have the angles and quasi-stripe character of the experimentally observed T phase in 1T-TaS2 and stripe phase in 2H-TaSe2. The paper therefore concludes that Coulomb domain-wall repulsion and inter-layer coupling are secondary factors that adjust domain sizes, not the origin of the anisotropic phase, and that the same mechanism predicts additional CDW states.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the free-energy coefficients fitted to bulk 1T-TaS2 and 2H-TaSe2 transfer unchanged to a single free-standing monolayer; the paper uses the bulk parameters without monolayer-specific validation and relies on them in Section 1.1 and the Methods.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Monolayer 1T-TaS2 and 2H-TaSe2 should show stripe or quasi-stripe CDW phases even in the complete absence of inter-layer stacking, consistent with observed monolayer CDW textures.
  • Coulomb interaction between domain walls and inter-layer interaction are demoted to secondary factors that change domain size but are not needed to create anisotropic domain walls.
  • The domain-wall angle is set by the commensurability indices $(\mu,\nu)$ through $\phi_C = \cos^{-1}((\mu+\nu/2)/\sqrt{\mu^2+\mu\nu+\nu^2})$: both $\mu$ and $\nu$ nonzero gives quasi-stripe T walls, while $\nu=0$ gives stripe walls.
  • The multivalley landscape predicts new CDW phases and offers a route to explaining 'hidden' CDW states as metastable local minima.
  • On heating, anisotropic domain walls can form one by one, breaking the threefold rotational symmetry and increasing entropy, which explains why stripe and T phases appear only on heating from the commensurate state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the same mechanism should operate in any van der Waals material with three coexisting CDW wave vectors satisfying the triple-Q condition, so the model's predictions could be tested in other MX2 compounds with different $(\mu,\nu)$.
  • Beyond the paper: if hidden CDW states are metastable minima of this landscape, then the path taken in wave-vector space during a quench should determine which minimum is reached; momentum-resolved pump-probe experiments could test this by mapping the transient wave vectors.
  • Beyond the paper: the analogy with Abrikosov vortex formation suggests a quantitative prediction, namely that the density of domain walls should grow continuously with temperature in a single monolayer, and the heating/cooling asymmetry of domain size should be measurable in transport or scanning tunneling microscopy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper claims to explain the origin of stripe and quasi-stripe (T) CDW domain-wall phases in monolayer 1T-TaS2 and 2H-TaSe2 within the isotropic McMillan-Nakanishi-Shiba Ginzburg-Landau free energy, without invoking anisotropic Coulomb interactions or interlayer coupling. The authors first map the free energy over wave-vector space under a 120° constraint, finding a multivalley landscape with many local minima. Removing the 120° constraint, they report free-energy minima whose wave-vector triples form regular triangles and identify these with the experimentally observed T and stripe phases. They conclude that anisotropic domain walls can appear naturally from isotropic interactions, with Coulomb and interlayer effects demoted to secondary factors.

Significance. If fully established, the claim would be significant: it would provide an alternative explanation for stripe and T phases in monolayers, predict new CDW phases (e.g., √7×√7 TaSe2 with T domain walls), and reframe prior Coulomb/interlayer explanations as secondary. The paper's strength is the extension of Nakanishi-Shiba to a full two-dimensional wave-vector landscape, with two parameter sets giving qualitatively similar multivalley structures. The central difficulty is that the key unconstrained claim is not actually demonstrated by the reported constrained minimizations, so the significance is currently conditional on additional numerical evidence.

major comments (4)
  1. [§1.3, Figure 4(a)] The claimed T-phase minima are found on a codimension-2 slice of Q-space. The text states that 'from the triple-Q condition there are four independent degrees of freedom. Here, we fix two degrees of freedom, namely, the angles between domain walls, to visualize the free energy. The angles between domain walls are known from experiments [14].' Fixing δφ2 and δφ3 to the experimental values means the displayed minima are not necessarily stationary points of the full free energy: the gradient along the two fixed directions is not checked. Since the abstract claims the stripe and T phases appear 'naturally' as local minima of the isotropic free energy, the experimentally known angles cannot be used as inputs at this stage. The authors should perform an unconstrained minimization over all four independent wave-vector components (with a Hessian verification) and report whether the previously found points are genuine stationary points. The same concern applies to the stripe phase, where Q(1)=Q_C(1) is imposed from ref [11] without checking full 4D stationarity.
  2. [§1.3, Figure 4(a)] The agreement with experiment for the T phase is partly circular. Because the domain-wall angles δφ2 and δφ3 are fixed to the values from ref [14] before minimization, the observed agreement in those angles is built in; the only nontrivial comparison is the domain size, and the paper states that 'the domain size in our calculation is smaller than bulk crystal.' The central claim that the T phase appears naturally from isotropic interactions would require the minimization to reproduce the experimental angles without imposing them.
  3. [§1.1 and Methods] The free-energy coefficients a0, a1, b, c, d and the gradient operator e(-i∇) are taken from fits to bulk 1T-TaS2 and 2H-TaSe2 (refs [30,31,32]) and used without modification for free-standing monolayers. The paper provides no monolayer-specific validation, sensitivity analysis, or error estimates for these parameters. Because the multivalley landscape and the positions of the T/stripe minima are quantitative outputs, the possibility that these minima are artifacts of bulk-derived parameters is a load-bearing uncertainty. The authors should either provide monolayer-specific parameter estimates, show that the qualitative conclusions are robust to parameter variations, or clearly state this as a limitation.
  4. [Numerical results, Figures 2-4] Numerical results are reported without convergence analysis, error bars, or a description of the numerical tolerances used to identify local minima. The claim that type-1 and type-2 free energies give 'almost identical local minima' is not quantified, and no code or data repository is provided. To make the multivalley landscape reproducible, the authors should specify the grid, the convergence criteria for solving ∂F/∂Δ=0, and the criterion for when a point is called a local minimum.
minor comments (6)
  1. [References] Reference [33] is listed as 'To be published'; this is not an accessible citation and should be replaced or removed.
  2. [Introduction and §1.3] The statement that 'the only input from experimental data is the incommensurate wave vectors Q_IC' is contradicted by §1.3, where experimental domain-wall angles from ref [14] are used as inputs; the text should be revised to acknowledge this.
  3. [Methods] The distinction between type-1 and type-2 free energies is described only as 'different forms of e(-i∇)'; the explicit forms or equations should be given.
  4. [Figure 4] Figure 4 shows free-energy landscapes without contour levels or a color scale, making it difficult to judge the depth and sharpness of the claimed minima; adding contours and marking the constrained slice would improve clarity.
  5. [Figure 6 caption] The caption states 'in this article we focus on |q(1)|=|q(2)|=|q(3)| and each |q(i)| are separated by a 120°,' which is inconsistent with §1.3 where the 120° constraint is removed; the scope should be clarified.
  6. [Discussion] The entropy/Kosterlitz-Thouless analogy in the Discussion is qualitative and not developed; no entropy contribution is computed. The paragraph should be framed as speculation or supported by a quantitative estimate.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

T- and stripe-phase 'natural emergence' claims are partially circular: the experimental domain-wall angles/constraints are fixed as inputs, and the reported minima are only on that constrained slice.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 1.3 (Anisotropic CDW Phases), T-phase calculation for 1T-TaS2]
    "From the triple-Q condition there are four independent degrees of freedom. Here, we fix two degrees of freedom, namely, the angles between domain walls, to visualize the free energy. The angles between domain walls are known from experiments [14]. Here, we consider the angles 𝛿𝜙1 = 360° − 𝛿𝜙2 − 𝛿𝜙3 , 𝛿𝜙2 = 180° − 𝜙C , 𝛿𝜙3 = 150° , where 𝜙C ≈ 13.9° is the angle between 𝐐C(𝑖)and 𝐐IC(𝑖)."

    The central claim is that the T phase appears naturally as a local minimum of the isotropic free energy without anisotropic interactions. The calculation, however, reduces the four independent wave-vector degrees of freedom to two by fixing the domain-wall angles δφ2 and δφ3 to the experimental values from Ref. [14]. A minimum of F on this constrained two-dimensional slice is not a stationary point of the full 4D problem unless the gradient along the fixed directions vanishes; the paper provides no unconstrained 4D minimization and no Hessian check. The subsequent 'good agreement' with the experimental T-phase triangle [14] is therefore partly constructed from the same experimental angles that were inserted as inputs. The anisotropic domain-wall structure is assumed, not derived.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 1.3 (Anisotropic CDW Phases), stripe-phase calculation for 2H-TaSe2]
    "According to experimental results [11], the stripe phase is obtained by minimizing the free energy with the constraint 𝐐(1) = 𝐐C(1). Figure 4 (b) is the free energy (N = 1) visualized with 𝐐(2) and 𝐐(3). Clearly, these local minima form a regular triangle with 𝐐C(1). These domain walls correspond to the stripe phase."

    The stripe-phase result imposes the experimental constraint Q(1)=Q_C(1) from Ref. [11] and then searches over Q(2) and Q(3) only. This is a conditional minimization, not evidence that the isotropic McMillan-Nakanishi-Shiba free energy has a stripe-phase minimum in the full four-dimensional wave-vector space. Because the defining experimental condition of the stripe phase is an input constraint rather than an output of the calculation, the conclusion that stripe domain walls 'can be formed naturally' is contingent on the imported experimental data, making the prediction partially circular.

full rationale

Most of the paper's machinery is self-contained: the 120°-constrained multivalley free-energy landscapes in Sections 1.1 and 1.2 are genuine numerical computations using the standard McMillan-Nakanishi-Shiba phenomenological free energy, and the higher-harmonic expansion is a well-defined algorithm rather than a redescribed experimental result. The circularity is concentrated in Section 1.3, where the paper's headline conclusion is drawn. For the T phase, two of the four independent wave-vector degrees of freedom are fixed to the experimentally measured domain-wall angles from Ref. [14]; for the stripe phase, the experimental condition Q(1)=Q_C(1) from Ref. [11] is imposed. In both cases the paper then reports local minima in the remaining two-dimensional slice and concludes that the anisotropic phases 'appear naturally.' Minima on a constrained slice are not free-energy local minima of the unconstrained problem unless the omitted gradients vanish, and no such verification is reported. The 'agreement' with the experimental T and stripe phases is therefore partly built in by construction. The self-citation to the authors' own monolayer experiment [22] is supporting evidence rather than a load-bearing derivation step, so it does not independently raise the circularity score. Overall, the central 'natural appearance' claim partially reduces to fitted inputs, giving a score of 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a phenomenological free energy whose coefficients are fitted to bulk experimental data, on the specific experimental wave vectors Q_IC, and partly on the experimental domain-wall angles for the T phase. No new physical entities are introduced. The robustness to parameter choice is supported only by comparing two existing parameter sets.

free parameters (4)
  • McMillan free-energy coefficients a0, a1, b, c, d = not stated in text; taken from refs [30,31,32]
    The landscape shape and the existence of local minima depend on these bulk-fitted coefficients. Type-1 and type-2 sets give similar minima, which supports robustness, but the values themselves are experimental fits.
  • Incommensurate wave vectors Q_IC = |Q_IC|/|G_i| = 0.283 (1T-TaS2), 0.325 (2H-TaSe2)
    Input from electron diffraction experiments; sets the IC reference point in the free-energy landscape.
  • Domain-wall angles for T phase (delta_phi_2, delta_phi_3) = delta_phi_2 = 180 deg - phi_C ~ 166.1 deg, delta_phi_3 = 150 deg
    Fixed from experiment [14] before minimization, so the T-phase result is partly constrained by the target data.
  • Temperature values = T=225 K (1T-TaS2), T=100 K (2H-TaSe2)
    Chosen to match the experimental phase regimes; the free-energy coefficients are temperature dependent.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The McMillan-Nakanishi-Shiba Ginzburg-Landau free energy is a valid description of CDW order in monolayer MX2 compounds.
    The paper applies a bulk phenomenological model to monolayers without re-derivation or first-principles justification (Methods).
  • ad hoc to paper Order-parameter harmonics can be truncated at finite N with real amplitudes Delta_lmn.
    The reality assumption and N=3 truncation are not fully justified; the authors show N-dependence but not convergence to N to infinity (Methods, Section 1.1).
  • domain assumption The triple-Q condition Q1 + Q2 + Q3 = 0 holds for all considered CDW states.
    Standard for these materials and consistent with experimental CDW structures, stated in the introduction.
  • domain assumption The free-energy coefficients have the periodicity of the crystal lattice with the six shortest reciprocal lattice vectors, and only symmetry-compatible terms are kept.
    Standard Ginzburg-Landau construction for the commensurate CDW problem (Methods).
  • ad hoc to paper Entropy increases from symmetry-breaking domain walls stabilize stripe and T phases, analogous to vortices in the Kosterlitz-Thouless transition.
    Qualitative, not derived; used to explain the heating asymmetry and the order of phase transitions (Discussion).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Origin of Stripe and Quasi-Stripe CDW Structures in Monolayer MX$ _2$ compounds: Multivalley Free Energy Landscape." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OOIBJFBA

@misc{pith2026190803655,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Origin of Stripe and Quasi-Stripe CDW Structures in Monolayer MX$ _2$ compounds: Multivalley Free Energy Landscape},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OOIBJFBA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03655}
}
abstract

Ultrathin sheets of transition metal dichalcogenides (MX$ _2$) with charge density waves (CDWs) is increasingly gaining interest as a promising candidate for graphene-like devices. Although experimental data including stripe/quasi-stripe structure and hidden states have been reported, the ground state of ultrathin MX$ _2$ compounds and, in particular, the origin of anisotropic (stripe and quasi-stripe) CDW phases is a long-standing problem. Anisotropic CDW phases have been explained by Coulomb interaction between domain walls and inter-layer interaction. However, these models assume that anisotropic domain walls can exist in the first place. Here, we report that anisotropic CDW domain walls can appear naturally without assuming anisotropic interactions: We explain the origin of these phases by topological defect theory (line defects in a two-dimensional plane) and interference between harmonics of macroscopic CDW wave functions. We revisit the McMillan-Nakanishi-Shiba model for monolayer 1$T$-TaS$ _2$ and 2$H$-TaSe$ _2$ and show that CDWs with wave vectors that are separated by $120^\circ$ (i.e. the three-fold rotation symmetry of the underlying lattice) contain a free-energy landscape with many local minima. Then, we remove this $120^\circ$ constraint and show that free energy local minima corresponding to the stripe and quasi-stripe phase appear. Our results imply that Coulomb interaction between domain walls and inter-layer interaction may be secondary factors for the appearance of these phases. Furthermore, this model can predict new CDW phases, hence it may become the basis to study CDW further. We anticipate our results to be a starting point for further study in two-dimensional physics, such as explanation of "Hidden CDW states", study the interplay between supersolid symmetry and lattice symmetry, and application to other van der Waals structures.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [14]

    X-ray study of the new charge-density-wave phase in 1T-TaS2,

    S. Tanda and T. Sambongi, "X-ray study of the new charge-density-wave phase in 1T-TaS2," Synthetic Metals, vol. 11, p. 85–100, 1985

    work page 1985

  2. [30]

    Domain-like Incommensurate Charge-Density-Wave States and the First- Order Incommensurate-Commensurate Transitions in Layered Tantalum Dichalcogenides. I. 1T- Polytype,

    K. Nakanishi and H. Shiba, "Domain-like Incommensurate Charge-Density-Wave States and the First- Order Incommensurate-Commensurate Transitions in Layered Tantalum Dichalcogenides. I. 1T- Polytype," Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 43, p. 1839–1847, 1977

    work page 1977

  3. [11]

    Broken Hexagonal Symmetry in the Incommensurate Charge-Density Wave Structure of 2H-TaSe2,

    R. M. Fleming, D. E. Moncton, D. B. McWhan and F. J. DiSalvo, "Broken Hexagonal Symmetry in the Incommensurate Charge-Density Wave Structure of 2H-TaSe2," Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 576--579, 1980

    work page 1980

  4. [1]

    Colloquium: Theory of intertwined orders in high temperature superconductors,

    E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson and J. M. Tranquada, "Colloquium: Theory of intertwined orders in high temperature superconductors," Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 87, no. 2, p. 457, 2015

    work page 2015

  5. [2]

    Theory of discommensurations and the commensurate-incommensurate charge- density-wave phase transition,

    W. L. McMillan, "Theory of discommensurations and the commensurate-incommensurate charge- density-wave phase transition," Phys. Rev. B, vol. 14, p. 1496–1502, 1976

    work page 1976

  6. [3]

    Commensurate-incommensurate transitions in rare- gas monolayers adsorbed on graphite and in layered charge-density-wave systems,

    P. Bak, D. Mukamel, J. Villain and K. Wentowska, "Commensurate-incommensurate transitions in rare- gas monolayers adsorbed on graphite and in layered charge-density-wave systems," Phys. Rev. B, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 1610, 1979

    work page 1979

  7. [4]

    Theory of Three-Dimensional Orderings of Charge-Density Waves in 1T- TaX2 (X: S, Se),

    K. Nakanishi and H. Shiba, "Theory of Three-Dimensional Orderings of Charge-Density Waves in 1T- TaX2 (X: S, Se)," Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 53, p. 1103–1113, 1984

    work page 1984

  8. [5]

    Spontaneous Breaking of Isotropy Observed in the Electronic Transport of Rare-Earth Tritellurides,

    A. A. Sinchenko, P. D. Grigoriev, P. Lejay and P. Monceau, "Spontaneous Breaking of Isotropy Observed in the Electronic Transport of Rare-Earth Tritellurides," Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 112, no. 3, p. 036601, 2014

    work page 2014

Show all 40 references
  1. [6]

    Charge-Density Waves in Metallic, Layered, Transition- Metal Dichalcogenides,

    J. A. Wilson, F. J. Di Salvo and S. Mahajan, "Charge-Density Waves in Metallic, Layered, Transition- Metal Dichalcogenides," Phys. Rev. Lett, vol. 32, p. 882–885, 1974

    1974

  2. [7]

    Charge-density waves and superlattices in the metallic layered transition metal dichalcogenides,

    J. A. Wilson, F. J. Di Salvo and S. Mahajan, "Charge-density waves and superlattices in the metallic layered transition metal dichalcogenides," Advances in Physics, vol. 24, p. 117–201, 1975

    1975

  3. [8]

    The dynamics of charge-density waves,

    G. Grüner, "The dynamics of charge-density waves," Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 60, p. 1129–1181, 1988

    1988

  4. [9]

    Electronic crystals: an experimental overview,

    P. Monceau, "Electronic crystals: an experimental overview," Advances in Physics, vol. 61, p. 325–581, 2012

    2012

  5. [10]

    Anomalous transport properties of a linear-chain metal:NbSe3,

    N. P. Ong and P. Monceau, "Anomalous transport properties of a linear-chain metal:NbSe3," Phys. Rev. B, vol. 16, no. 8, p. 3443, 1977

    1977

  6. [12]

    Scanning tunnelling microscopy of charge-density waves in transition metal chalcogenides,

    R. V. Coleman, B. Giambattista, P. K. Hansma, A. Johnson, W. W. McNairy and C. G. Slough, "Scanning tunnelling microscopy of charge-density waves in transition metal chalcogenides," Advances in Physics, vol. 37, no. 6, p. 559–644, 1988

    1988

  7. [13]

    X-Ray Study of Charge Density Wave Structure in 1T- TaS2,

    S. Tanda, T. Sambongi, T. Tani and S. Tanaka, "X-Ray Study of Charge Density Wave Structure in 1T- TaS2," Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 53, p. 476–479, 1984

    1984

  8. [15]

    Controlling charge-density-wave states in nano-thick crystals of 1T-TaS2,

    M. Yoshida, Y. Zhang, J. Ye, R. Zuzuki, Y. Imai, S. Kimura, A. Fujiwara and Y. Iwasa, "Controlling charge-density-wave states in nano-thick crystals of 1T-TaS2," Scientific Reports, vol. 4, p. 7302, 2014

    2014

  9. [16]

    Atomic lattice disorder in charge-density-wave phases of exfoliated dichalcogenides (1T-TaS2),

    R. Hovden, A. W. Tsen, P. Liu, B. H. Savitzky, I. E. Baggari, Y. Liu, W. Lu, Y. Sun, P. Kim, A. N. Pasupathy and L. F. Koursoutis, "Atomic lattice disorder in charge-density-wave phases of exfoliated dichalcogenides (1T-TaS2)," PNAS, vol. 113, no. 41, p. 11420, 2016

    2016

  10. [17]

    Gate-tunable phase transitions in thin flakes of 1T-TaS2,

    Y. Yu, F. Yang, X. F. Lu, Y. J. Yan, Y.-H. Cho, L. Ma, X. Niu, S. Kim, Y.-W. Son, D. Feng, S. Li, S.- W. Cheong, X. H. Chen and Y. Zhang, "Gate-tunable phase transitions in thin flakes of 1T-TaS2," Nat. Nanotechnol., vol. 10, p. 270–276, 2015

    2015

  11. [18]

    Structure and control of charge density waves in two-dimensional 1T-TaS2,

    A. W. Tsen, R. Hovden, D. Wang, Y. D. Kim, J. Okamoto, K. A. Spoth, Y. Liu, W. Lu, Y. Sun, J. C. Hone, L. F. Kourkoutis, P. Kim and A. N. Pasupathy, "Structure and control of charge density waves in two-dimensional 1T-TaS2," PNAS, vol. 112, p. 5054–15059, 2015

    2015

  12. [19]

    Zone-center phonons of bulk, few-layer, and monolayer 1T-TaS2: Detection of commensurate charge density wave phase through Raman scattering,

    O. R. Albertin, R. Zhao, R. L. McCann, S. Feng, M. T. Maldonado, J. K. Freericks, J. A. Robinson and A. Y. Liu, "Zone-center phonons of bulk, few-layer, and monolayer 1T-TaS2: Detection of commensurate charge density wave phase through Raman scattering," Phys. Rev. B, vol. 93,...

    2016

  13. [20]

    Distinct surface and bulk charge density waves in ultrathin 1T-TaS2,

    R. He, J. Okamoto, Z. Ye, G. Ye, H. Anderson, X. Dai, X. Wu, J. Hu, Y. Liu, W. Lu, Y. Sun, A. N. Pasupathy and A. W. Tsen, "Distinct surface and bulk charge density waves in ultrathin 1T-TaS2," Phys. Rev. B, vol. 94, p. 201108(R), 2016

    2016

  14. [21]

    Ultrafast manipulation of mirror domain walls in a charge density wave,

    A. Zong, X. Shen, A. Kogar, L. Ye, C. Marks, D. Chowdhury, T. Rohwer, B. Freelon, S. Weathersby, R. Li, J. Yang, J. Checkelsky, X. Wang and N. Gedik, "Ultrafast manipulation of mirror domain walls in a charge density wave," Science Advances, vol. 4, p. eaau5501, 2018

    2018

  15. [22]

    Direct observation of monolayer, bi- layer, and tri-layer charge density waves in 1T-TaS2 by transmission electron microscopy without a substrate,

    D. Sakabe, Z. Liu, K. Suenaga, K. Nakatsugawa and S. Tanda, "Direct observation of monolayer, bi- layer, and tri-layer charge density waves in 1T-TaS2 by transmission electron microscopy without a substrate," npj Quantum Materials, vol. 2, p. 22, 2017

    2017

  16. [23]

    Domain-size effects on the dynamics of a charge density wave in 1T−TaS2,

    G. Lantz, C. Laulhé, S. Ravy, M. Kubli, M. Savioni, K. Tasca, E. Aberu, V. Esposito, M. Porer, A. Ciavardini, L. Cario, J. Rittmann, P. Beaud and S. L. Johnson, "Domain-size effects on the dynamics of a charge density wave in 1T−TaS2," Phys. Rev. B, vol. 96, p. 224101, 2017

    2017

  17. [24]

    Controlling the metal-to-insulator relaxation of the metastable hidden quantum state in 1T-TaS2,

    I. Vaskivskyi, J. Gospodaric, S. Brazovskii, D. Svetin, P. Sutar, E. Goreshnik, I. A. Mihailovic, T. Mertelj and D. Mihailovic, "Controlling the metal-to-insulator relaxation of the metastable hidden quantum state in 1T-TaS2," Sci. Adv, vol. 1, no. 6, p. e1500168, 2015

    2015

  18. [25]

    Intertwined chiral charge orders and topological stabilization of the light-induced state of a prototypical transition metal dichalcogenide,

    Y. A. Gerasimenko, P. Karpov, I. Vaskivkyi, S. Brazovskii and D. Mihailovic, "Intertwined chiral charge orders and topological stabilization of the light-induced state of a prototypical transition metal dichalcogenide," npj Quantum Materials, vol. 4, p. 32, 2019

    2019

  19. [26]

    Observation of charge density waves in free-standing 1T-TaSe2 monolayers by transmission electron microscopy,

    P. C. Börner, M. K. Kinyanjui, T. Björkman, T. Lehnert, A. V. Krasheninnikov and U. Kaiser, "Observation of charge density waves in free-standing 1T-TaSe2 monolayers by transmission electron microscopy," Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 113, p. 173103, 2018

    2018

  20. [27]

    Persistent Charge-Density-Wave Order in Single-Layer TaSe2,

    H. Ryu, Y. Chen, H. Kim, H.-Z. Tsai, S. Tang, J. Jiang, F. Liou, S. Kahn, C. Jia, A. A. Omrani, J. H. Shim, Z. Hussain, Z.-X. Shen, K. Kim, B. I. Min, C. Hwang, M. F. Crommie and S.-K. Mo, "Persistent Charge-Density-Wave Order in Single-Layer TaSe2," Nano Lett., vol. 18, no. 2...

    2018

  21. [28]

    Laudau Theory of charge-density waves in transition-metal dichalcogenides,

    W. L. McMillan, "Laudau Theory of charge-density waves in transition-metal dichalcogenides," Phys. Rev. B, vol. 12, pp. 1187-1196, 1975

    1975

  22. [29]

    Theory of phonon dynamics near a charge-density-wave instability,

    R. N. Bhatt and W. L. McMillan, "Theory of phonon dynamics near a charge-density-wave instability," Phys. Rev. B, vol. 12, p. 2042–2044, 1975

    1975

  23. [31]

    Domain-like Incommensurate Charge-Density-Wave States and the First- Order Incommensurate-Commensurate Transitions in Layered Tantalum Dichalcogenides. II. 2H- Polytype,

    K. Nakanishi and H. Shiba, "Domain-like Incommensurate Charge-Density-Wave States and the First- Order Incommensurate-Commensurate Transitions in Layered Tantalum Dichalcogenides. II. 2H- Polytype," Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 44, p. 1465–1473, 1978

    1978

  24. [32]

    ORIGIN OF THE STABILIZATION OF THE NEARLY COMMENSURATE PHASE IN 1T-TaS2,

    Y. Yamada and H. Takatera, "ORIGIN OF THE STABILIZATION OF THE NEARLY COMMENSURATE PHASE IN 1T-TaS2," Solid State Commun, no. 21, pp. 41-44, 1977

    1977

  25. [34]

    Supercluster of Electrons in Ultrathin TaSe2 Nanocrystals,

    T. Toshima, K. Inagaki, N. Hatakenaka and S. Tanda, "Supercluster of Electrons in Ultrathin TaSe2 Nanocrystals," Journal of Physical Society of Japan, vol. 75, p. 024706, 2006

    2006

  26. [35]

    Ordering, metastability and phase transitions in two- dimensional systems,

    J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, "Ordering, metastability and phase transitions in two- dimensional systems," J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys, vol. 6, p. 1181–1203, 1973

    1973

  27. [36]

    Study of the superfluid transition in two-dimensional 4He films,

    J. D. Bishop and D. J. Reppy, "Study of the superfluid transition in two-dimensional 4He films," Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 40, p. 1727–1730, 1978

    1978

  28. [37]

    Ultrafast Switching to a Stable Hidden Quantum State in an Electronic Crystal,

    L. Stojchevska, I. Vaskivskyi, T. Mertelj, P. Kusar, D. Svetin, D. Brazovskii and D. Mihailovic, "Ultrafast Switching to a Stable Hidden Quantum State in an Electronic Crystal," Science, vol. 344, no. 6180, pp. 177-180, 2014. 17

    2014

  29. [38]

    Modeling of Evolution of a Complex Electronic System to an Ordered Hidden State: Application to Optical Quench in 1T-TaS2,

    S. Brazovskii, "Modeling of Evolution of a Complex Electronic System to an Ordered Hidden State: Application to Optical Quench in 1T-TaS2," J. Supercond. Nov. Mag., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1349-1353, 2015

    2015

  30. [39]

    Real-time observation of the coherent transition to a metastable emergent state in 1T-TaS2,

    J. Ravnik, I. Vaskivskyi, T. Mertelj and D. Mihailovic, "Real-time observation of the coherent transition to a metastable emergent state in 1T-TaS2," Phys. Rev. B, vol. 97, p. 075304, 2018

    2018

  31. [40]

    Quasicrystalline 30° twisted bilayer graphene as an incommensurate superlattice with strong interlayer coupling,

    W. Yao, E. Wang, C. Bao, Y. Zhang, K. Zhang, K. Bao, C. K. Chan, C. Chen, J. Avila, M. C. Asensio, J. Zhu and S. Zhou, "Quasicrystalline 30° twisted bilayer graphene as an incommensurate superlattice with strong interlayer coupling," PNAS, vol. 115, no. 27, pp. 6928-6933, 2018

    2018

  32. [41]

    The role of charge density waves in structural transformations of 1T TaS2,

    C. B. Scruby, P. M. Williams and G. S. Parry, "The role of charge density waves in structural transformations of 1T TaS2," Philosophical Magazine, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 255-274, 1975

    1975

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.