Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 56 references

Geometry of weighted Lorentz-Finsler manifolds I: Singularity theorems

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper extends the classical singularity theorems of general relativity to weighted Lorentz-Finsler spacetimes, proving that under weighted Ricci curvature bounds $\mathrm{Ric}_N\ge 0$ and genericity, causal geodesics are necessarily…

desk verdict Strong framework and genuinely new weighted Finsler singularity machinery, but a load-bearing gap in Lemma 7.8 (unproved limit D(t)) undermines the singularity theorems as stated; likely fixable. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03832 v3 pith:OPAYUA7O submitted 2019-08-11 math.DG math-phmath.MP

Yufeng Lu , Ettore Minguzzi , Shin-ichi Ohta This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DGmath-phmath.MP MSC 53C5053C6083C75
keywords weightedRiccicurvatureLorentz-FinslermanifoldssingularitytheoremsRaychaudhuriequationepsilon-completenessBakry-EmeryBonnet-Myerstheoremcausalgeodesics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper develops a weighted Ricci curvature $\mathrm{Ric}_N$ for Lorentz-Finsler spacetimes, where the metric may depend on direction and the weight $\psi$ is defined on causal vectors, and proves that the main singularity theorems of general relativity hold in that setting. The central claim is that, under the causal $N$-convergence condition $\mathrm{Ric}_N\ge 0$ and the standard genericity condition, every timelike or lightlike geodesic either develops conjugate points or fails to be complete with respect to an $\varepsilon$-proper time. The parameter $\varepsilon$ interpolates between ordinary proper time ($\varepsilon=1$) and the $\psi$-completeness used in earlier weighted Lorentzian work ($\varepsilon=0$), and the paper identifies precisely for which $N$-dependent $\varepsilon$-range the incompleteness conclusion follows. A weighted Bishop inequality additionally yields a Bonnet-Myers bound on the timelike diameter. A sympathetic reader should see this as a substantial unification: previous Finsler and weighted Lorentzian singularity theorems become special cases of one framework.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the weighted Ricci curvature $\mathrm{Ric}_N$ with effective dimension $N$, the $\varepsilon$-proper time $\tau_\varepsilon=\int e^{2(\varepsilon-1)\psi_\eta/n}\,dt$, and the associated $\varepsilon$-expansion $\theta_\varepsilon$. The key identity is the weighted Raychaudhuri inequality $\theta'_\varepsilon \le -\mathrm{Ric}_N(\eta_*)-\mathrm{tr}(\sigma_\varepsilon^2)-c\theta_\varepsilon^2$, whose coefficient $c=\frac1n(1-\varepsilon^2\frac{N-n}{N})$ in the timelike case selects the admissible $\varepsilon$-range; positivity of $c$ is what makes the expansion blow up and produce conjugate points. Step III of the singularity theorems is supplied by causality core statements, such as existence of future lightlike $S$-rays from compact sets over a non-compact Cauchy hypersurface and non-existence of compact future null araying sets in chronological spacetimes without causal lines, which the paper imports from Lorentzian causality theory.

What would settle it

Find a weighted Lorentz-Finsler spacetime satisfying $\mathrm{Ric}_N\ge 0$ in causal directions, the genericity condition, and future/past $\varepsilon$-completeness for some admissible $\varepsilon$, but with no conjugate points along some causal geodesic; this would directly contradict Propositions 7.6 and 7.9. Alternatively, exhibit a Finsler spacetime with a non-compact Cauchy hypersurface and a compact set with no future lightlike $S$-ray, or a chronological Finsler spacetime without causal lines but with a compact future null araying set, which would break Theorems 8.3 or 8.8 and hence the singularity theorems built on them.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On a weighted Lorentz-Finsler manifold $(M,L,\psi)$, the paper defines the weighted Ricci curvature $\mathrm{Ric}_N(v)=\mathrm{Ric}(v)+\psi''_\eta(0)-\psi'_\eta(0)^2/(N-n)$ for $N\ne n$, with suitable limiting cases, and proves weighted versions of the Jacobi, Riccati and Raychaudhuri equations for the $\varepsilon$-expansion associated with the reparametrized time $\tau_\varepsilon=\int e^{2(\varepsilon-1)\psi_\eta/n}\,dt$. From these equations it derives a convergence criterion, the $\varepsilon$-range (5.20) in the timelike case and (6.6) in the null case, under which $\mathrm{Ric}_N\ge 0$ forces the expansion to blow up in finite $\varepsilon$-time, producing conjugate points. Combining this mechanism with causality core statements imported from Lorentzian causality theory, the paper obtains weighted Lorentz-Finsler versions of the Penrose, Hawking, and Hawking-Penrose singularity theorems: under causal $N$-convergence and genericity, the spacetime must contain causal geodesics that are $\varepsilon$-incomplete for every admissible $\varepsilon$. It also proves a weighted Bonnet-Myers theorem, $\mathrm{diam}(M)\le \pi\sqrt{N/K}$, via the weighted Bishop inequality.

Load-bearing premise

The theorems rely on the unproved assumption that the causality core statements of Step III, such as existence of future lightlike $S$-rays from compact sets in spacetimes with non-compact Cauchy hypersurfaces and absence of compact future null araying sets in chronological spacetimes without causal lines, carry over word-for-word from Lorentzian to weighted Lorentz-Finsler spacetimes because they only use the cone distribution.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every timelike geodesic in a spacetime satisfying the timelike $N$-convergence condition and timelike genericity is either conjugate-point-bearing or $\varepsilon$-incomplete for every $\varepsilon$ in the range (5.20).
  • The null analogue holds for $N\in(-\infty,1]\cup[n,\infty]$ under null genericity and null $N$-convergence, with $\varepsilon$-range (6.6).
  • A $\psi$-trapped surface in a spacetime with a non-compact Cauchy hypersurface forces a future lightlike geodesic issued from it to be future $\varepsilon$-incomplete for every admissible $\varepsilon$, generalizing Penrose's theorem.
  • A compact $\psi$-contracting spacelike hypersurface forces a future $\varepsilon$-incomplete timelike geodesic issued normally from it, generalizing Hawking's theorem.
  • The Hawking-Penrose theorem holds in chronological Finsler spacetimes under causal genericity and causal $N$-convergence: a compact achronal set without edge, a $\psi$-trapped surface, or a reconverging point yields either a timelike or lightlike $\varepsilon$-incomplete geodesic.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the imported causality core statements hold, the same three-step strategy should yield further singularity theorems not listed here, such as Gannon's or Borde's theorems, by replacing Step III, as the paper itself notes.
  • The $\varepsilon$-range reveals a qualitative boundary: for $N\in[n,\infty)$ both ordinary and $\psi$-completeness fail, while for negative $N$ only $\psi$-incompleteness can be inferred, suggesting that the weight's growth controls how far the singularity is visible in proper time.
  • Because $\mathrm{Ric}_N$ is defined through a direction-dependent weight on causal vectors rather than a fixed measure, the comparison inequalities proved here are natural candidates for testing in synthetic Lorentzian curvature-dimension limits.
  • A companion splitting theorem, announced by the authors, is the natural next test: if the splitting analogue fails at the extremal $N=0$ or $N=1$ values, the same extremal phenomenon observed here for genericity will likely reappear.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a weighted Lorentz-Finsler framework by introducing a positively 0-homogeneous weight function ψ on causal vectors and the associated weighted Ricci curvature Ric_N. It derives weighted Jacobi, Riccati, and Raychaudhuri equations in both the timelike and null cases, introduces an ǫ-proper time and associated ǫ-completeness conditions, and proves conjugate-point criteria with N-dependent ǫ-ranges. A weighted Bishop inequality and a weighted Bonnet-Myers theorem are established. The final section uses the standard three-step singularity-theorem strategy, together with imported causality-core statements from [Min6, Min7], to obtain weighted Lorentz-Finsler versions of the Penrose, Hawking-Penrose, and Hawking singularity theorems.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper provides a substantial and broadly useful unification: it extends Finsler singularity theory to a weighted setting with a dimensional parameter N, gives precise N-dependent ǫ-ranges for which incompleteness can be inferred, and supplies the first weighted Lorentz-Finsler Bonnet-Myers theorem. The algebraic derivation of the weighted Jacobi, Riccati, and Raychaudhuri equations is explicit and checkable, and the ǫ-range conditions in (5.20) and (6.6) are concrete and falsifiable statements rather than heuristic conditions. The paper's reliance on prior causality-core results is legitimate because those statements are topological and do not use the weight; however, the proof of the main conjugate-point generation step has a genuine gap that must be addressed before the singularity theorems can be regarded as established.

major comments (1)
  1. [§7, Lemma 7.8 and Proposition 7.6] Lemma 7.8 is stated for an arbitrary timelike geodesic η:(a,b)→M without conjugate points, with no completeness or b=+∞ assumption. Its proof says to argue as in [BEE, Lemma 12.13], but that lemma assumes future completeness in the affine parameter. This hypothesis is not supplied and is not implied by ǫ-completeness: Definition 5.10 explicitly allows b<+∞ with τ_ǫ(t)→+∞ as t→b. The missing hypothesis is essential. At the ODE level, for the scalar Jacobi equation J''+J=0 on (a,b)=(-π/2,π) with t1=0, the field J(t)=sin t satisfies J(t1)=0, J'(t1)=1 and has no zero in (t1,b), yet D_s(t)=sin t∫_t^s csc^2 r dr = sin t(cot t - cot s) has no finite limit as s→b. Hence Lemma 7.8 is false as stated. Since Proposition 7.6 uses the limiting field D to obtain θ1(t1)>0, and Theorems 7.11, 7.12 and all of Section 8 depend on Proposition 7.6, this gap is load-bearing. A repair could plausibly be made by reformulating the limit in the τ_ǫ parameter using the weighted tensor J_ψ and the ǫ-completeness hypothesis, but such an argument is not present in the manuscript.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains a typographical artifact in 'weight ed Lorentz-Finsler'; it should read 'weighted Lorentz-Finsler'.
  2. [§5.3, Definition 5.10] The term 'future ǫ-complete' may mislead because it is defined by divergence of τ_ǫ rather than by b=+∞; one sentence explicitly noting that b may be finite would help the reader.
  3. [§7, Theorems 7.11 and 7.12] The phrase 'including a pair of conjugate points' should read 'containing a pair of conjugate points' or 'having a pair of conjugate points'.
  4. [§8, Theorem 8.9] In item (iii), the phrase 'the lightlike geodesic is reconverging' is informal; the precise condition involving θ1 becoming negative is clear from the statement, but the wording could be tightened.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the weighted Raychaudhuri/conjugate-point chain is derived from explicit definitions, and the imported causality cores are independent prior results.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. Ric_N is introduced in Definition 4.1 as Ric(v) + psi'' - psi'^2/(N-n), and the epsilon-proper time is defined in (5.6)/(6.2). From these definitions and the unweighted Jacobi equation, Lemmas 5.4-5.5 and Theorems 5.6/6.1 derive the weighted Jacobi, Riccati, and Raychaudhuri equations by explicit differentiation and tracing. Proposition 5.8/6.3 obtains the epsilon-range (5.20)/(6.6) as the algebraic condition c(N,epsilon)>0, not as a fitted or predicted parameter. Corollaries 5.11/6.5 and Propositions 7.6/7.9 then propagate the Ric_N >= 0 assumption to conjugate-point existence, and Theorems 7.11/7.12 state the resulting dichotomy 'conjugate pair or epsilon-incomplete'. These are genuine consequences of the definitions rather than equivalences imposed by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; N and ǫ are theorem parameters. No new physical entities (particles, forces, dimensions) are postulated. The main external inputs are standard Finsler geometry and prior causality theorems by Minguzzi and others, which are used as black boxes. The structural assumption on ψ is explicit.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Chern connection and standard Finsler curvature machinery (Jacobi equation, symmetry of R_v, geodesic spray) behave as in [Sh, BCS, Min4].
    Sections 2-3 build on these standard results; no alternative is developed.
  • standard math Reversible Lorentz-Finsler manifolds of dimension n+1>=3 have two-component timelike cones (Theorem 2.5, cited from [Min3]).
    Used to justify a well-defined future/past causal structure for the spacetime model.
  • domain assumption The causality core statements from [Min6, Min7] (Avez-Seifert, S-ray existence, stable causality, Hawking-Penrose causality, Hawking causality) apply to weighted Lorentz-Finsler spacetimes.
    Step III of the singularity theorems (Section 8) imports these topological results without reproof; the paper states they pass word-for-word from closed cone structures.
  • domain assumption The weight ψ is C∞ and positively 0-homogeneous on causal vectors, and is not necessarily derived from a measure.
    Definition in Section 4 generalizes the Lorentz-Finsler measure space approach; all weighted quantities depend on this.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Geometry of weighted Lorentz-Finsler manifolds I: Singularity theorems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OPAYUA7O

@misc{pith2026190803832,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Geometry of weighted Lorentz-Finsler manifolds I: Singularity theorems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OPAYUA7O}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03832}
}
read the original abstract

We develop the theory of weighted Ricci curvature in a weighted Lorentz-Finsler framework and extend the classical singularity theorems of general relativity. In order to reach this result, we generalize the Jacobi, Riccati and Raychaudhuri equations to weighted Finsler spacetimes and study their implications for the existence of conjugate points along causal geodesics. We also show a weighted Lorentz-Finsler version of the Bonnet-Myers theorem based on a generalized Bishop inequality.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. B. Aazami and M. A. Javaloyes, Penrose's singularity theorem in a Finsler spacetime. Classical Quantum Gravity 33 (2016), no. 2, 025003, 22 pp

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    S. B. Alexander and R. L. Bishop, Lorentz and semi-Riemannian spaces with Alexandrov curvature bounds. Comm.\ Anal.\ Geom.\ 16 (2008), 251--282

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    G. S. Asanov, Finsler geometry, relativity and gauge theories. D.\ Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, 1985

    work page 1985

  4. [4]

    Bakry and M

    D. Bakry and M. \'Emery, Diffusions hypercontractives. (French) S\'eminaire de probabilit\'es, XIX, 1983/84, 177--206, Lecture Notes in Math., 1123 , Springer, Berlin, 1985

    work page 1983

  5. [5]

    Bakry, I

    D. Bakry, I. Gentil and M. Ledoux, Analysis and geometry of Markov diffusion operators. Springer, Cham, 2014

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Bao, S.-S

    D. Bao, S.-S. Chern and Z. Shen, An introduction to Riemann--Finsler geometry. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    J. K. Beem, Indefinite Finsler spaces and timelike spaces. Can.\ J.\ Math.\ 22 (1970), 1035--1039

    work page 1970

  8. [8]

    J. K. Beem, P. E. Ehrlich and K. L. Easley, Global Lorentzian Geometry. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 1996

    work page 1996

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Bernard and S

    P. Bernard and S. Suhr, Lyapounov functions of closed cone fields: From Conley theory to time functions. Comm.\ Math.\ Phys.\ 359 (2018), 467--498

    2018

  2. [10]

    Bertrand and M

    J. Bertrand and M. Puel, The optimal transport problem for relativistic costs. Calc.\ Var.\ Partial Differential Equations 46 (2013), 353--374

    2013

  3. [11]

    Borde, Singularities in closed spacetimes

    A. Borde, Singularities in closed spacetimes. Classical Quantum Gravity 2 (1985), 589--596

    1985

  4. [12]

    Brenier, Extended Monge--Kantorovich Theory

    Y. Brenier, Extended Monge--Kantorovich Theory. Optimal Transportation and Applications (Martina Franca, 2001). Lecture Notes in Math., 1813 , 91--121. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    2003

  5. [13]

    J. S. Case, Singularity theorems and the Lorentzian splitting theorem for the Bakry--Emery--Ricci tensor. J.\ Geom.\ Phys.\ 60 (2010), 477--490

    2010

  6. [14]

    Chavel, Riemannian geometry

    I. Chavel, Riemannian geometry. A modern introduction. Second edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006

    2006

  7. [15]

    Cordero-Erausquin, R

    D. Cordero-Erausquin, R. J. McCann and M. Schmuckenschl\"ager, A Riemannian interpolation inequality \`a la Borell, Brascamp and Lieb. Invent.\ Math.\ 146 (2001), 219--257

    2001

  8. [16]

    P. T. Chru\' s ciel, J. Grant, M. Kunzinger and E. Minguzzi, Preface [Non-regular spacetime geometry]. J.\ Phys.\ Conf.\ Ser.\ 968 (2018), 011001, 3pp

    2018

  9. [17]

    Eckstein and T

    M. Eckstein and T. Miller, Causality for nonlocal phenomena. Ann.\ Henri Poincar\'e 18 (2017), 3049--3096

    2017

  10. [18]

    Fathi and A

    A. Fathi and A. Siconolfi, On smooth time functions. Math.\ Proc.\ Camb.\ Phil.\ Soc.\ 152 (2012), 303--339

    2012

  11. [19]

    J. L. Friedman, K. Schleich and D. M. Witt, Topological censorship. Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ 71 (1993), 1486--1489

    1993

  12. [20]

    G. J. Galloway and E. Woolgar, Cosmological singularities in Bakry--\'Emery spacetimes. J.\ Geom.\ Phys.\ 86 (2014), 359--369

    2014

  13. [21]

    Gannon, Singularities in nonsimply connected space-times

    D. Gannon, Singularities in nonsimply connected space-times. J.\ Mathematical Phys.\ 16 (1975), 2364--2367

    1975

  14. [22]

    J. D. E. Grant, M. Kunzinger and C. S\"amann, Inextendibility of spacetimes and Lorentzian length spaces. Ann.\ Global Anal.\ Geom.\ 55 (2019), 133--147

    2019

  15. [23]

    S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The large scale structure of space-time. Cambridge University Press, London-New York, 1973

    1973

  16. [24]

    S. W. Hawking and R. Penrose, The singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology. Proc.\ Roy.\ Soc.\ London Ser.\ A 314 (1970), 529--548

    1970

  17. [25]

    Kell and S

    M. Kell and S. Suhr, On the existence of dual solutions for Lorentzian cost functions. Ann.\ Inst.\ H.\ Poincar\'e Anal.\ Non Lin\'eaire 37 (2020), 343--372

    2020

  18. [26]

    A. V. Kolesnikov and E. Milman, Brascamp--Lieb-type inequalities on weighted Riemannian manifolds with boundary. J.\ Geom.\ Anal.\ 27 (2017), 1680--1702

    2017

  19. [27]

    Kunzinger and C

    M. Kunzinger and C. S\"amann, Lorentzian length spaces. Ann.\ Global Anal.\ Geom.\ 54 (2018), 399--447

    2018

  20. [28]

    Lott and C

    J. Lott and C. Villani, Ricci curvature for metric-measure spaces via optimal transport. Ann.\ of Math.\ 169 (2009), 903--991

    2009

  21. [29]

    R. J. McCann, Displacement convexity of Boltzmann's entropy characterizes the strong energy condition from general relativity. Camb.\ J.\ Math.\ 8 (2020), 609--681

    2020

  22. [30]

    Milman, Beyond traditional curvature-dimension I: new model spaces for isoperimetric and concentration inequalities in negative dimension

    E. Milman, Beyond traditional curvature-dimension I: new model spaces for isoperimetric and concentration inequalities in negative dimension. Trans.\ Amer.\ Math.\ Soc.\ 369 (2017), 3605--3637

    2017

  23. [31]

    Minguzzi, Chronological spacetimes without lightlike lines are stably causal

    E. Minguzzi, Chronological spacetimes without lightlike lines are stably causal. Comm.\ Math.\ Phys.\ 288 (2009), 801--819

    2009

  24. [32]

    Minguzzi, Convex neighborhoods for Lipschitz connections and sprays

    E. Minguzzi, Convex neighborhoods for Lipschitz connections and sprays. Monatsh.\ Math.\ 177 (2015), 569--625

    2015

  25. [33]

    Minguzzi, Light cones in Finsler spacetimes

    E. Minguzzi, Light cones in Finsler spacetimes. Comm.\ Math.\ Phys.\ 334 (2015), 1529--1551

    2015

  26. [34]

    Minguzzi, Raychaudhuri equation and singularity theorems in Finsler spacetimes

    E. Minguzzi, Raychaudhuri equation and singularity theorems in Finsler spacetimes. Classical Quantum Gravity 32 (2015), 185008, 26pp

    2015

  27. [35]

    Minguzzi, An equivalence of Finslerian relativistic theories

    E. Minguzzi, An equivalence of Finslerian relativistic theories. Rep.\ Math.\ Phys.\ 77 (2016), 45--55

    2016

  28. [36]

    Minguzzi, Causality theory for closed cone structures with applications

    E. Minguzzi, Causality theory for closed cone structures with applications. Rev.\ Math.\ Phys.\ 31 (2019), 1930001, 139pp

    2019

  29. [37]

    Minguzzi, Lorentzian causality theory

    E. Minguzzi, Lorentzian causality theory. Living Reviews in Relativity 22 , 3 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/s41114-019-0019-x

    2019 doi

  30. [38]

    Suhr, An optimal transport formulation of the Einstein equations of general relativity

    A, Mondino and S. Suhr, An optimal transport formulation of the Einstein equations of general relativity. Preprint (2018). Available at arXiv:1810.13309

    2018 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Ohta, Finsler interpolation inequalities

    S. Ohta, Finsler interpolation inequalities. Calc.\ Var.\ Partial Differential Equations 36 (2009), 211--249

    2009

  32. [40]

    Ohta, Vanishing S-curvature of Randers spaces

    S. Ohta, Vanishing S-curvature of Randers spaces. Differential Geom.\ Appl.\ 29 (2011), 174--178

    2011

  33. [41]

    Ohta, Splitting theorems for Finsler manifolds of nonnegative Ricci curvature

    S. Ohta, Splitting theorems for Finsler manifolds of nonnegative Ricci curvature. J.\ Reine Angew.\ Math.\ 700 (2015), 155--174

    2015

  34. [42]

    Ohta, (K,N) -convexity and the curvature-dimension condition for negative N

    S. Ohta, (K,N) -convexity and the curvature-dimension condition for negative N . J.\ Geom.\ Anal.\ 26 (2016), 2067--2096

    2016

  35. [43]

    Ohta, Nonlinear geometric analysis on Finsler manifolds

    S. Ohta, Nonlinear geometric analysis on Finsler manifolds. Eur.\ J.\ Math.\ 3 (2017), 916--952

    2017

  36. [44]

    Ohta and K.-T

    S. Ohta and K.-T. Sturm, Bochner--Weitzenb\"ock formula and Li--Yau estimates on Finsler manifolds. Adv.\ Math.\ 252 (2014), 429--448

    2014

  37. [45]

    O'Neill, Semi-Riemannian geometry: With applications to relativity

    B. O'Neill, Semi-Riemannian geometry: With applications to relativity. Academic Press, Inc., New York, 1983

    1983

  38. [46]

    Penrose, Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities

    R. Penrose, Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities. Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ 14 (1965), 57--59

    1965

  39. [47]

    Perlick, Fermat principle in Finsler spacetimes

    V. Perlick, Fermat principle in Finsler spacetimes. Gen.\ Relativ.\ Gravit.\ 38 (2006), 365--380

    2006

  40. [48]

    von Renesse and K.-T

    M.-K. von Renesse and K.-T. Sturm, Transport inequalities, gradient estimates, entropy and Ricci curvature. Comm.\ Pure Appl.\ Math.\ 58 (2005), 923--940

    2005

  41. [49]

    Shen, Lectures on Finsler geometry

    Z. Shen, Lectures on Finsler geometry. World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore, 2001

    2001

  42. [50]

    Sturm, On the geometry of metric measure spaces

    K.-T. Sturm, On the geometry of metric measure spaces. I. Acta Math.\ 196 (2006), 65--131

    2006

  43. [51]

    Sturm, On the geometry of metric measure spaces

    K.-T. Sturm, On the geometry of metric measure spaces. II. Acta Math.\ 196 (2006), 133--177

    2006

  44. [52]

    Suhr, Theory of optimal transport for Lorentzian cost functions

    S. Suhr, Theory of optimal transport for Lorentzian cost functions. M\"unster J.\ Math.\ 11 (2018), 13--47

    2018

  45. [53]

    Villani, Optimal transport, old and new

    C. Villani, Optimal transport, old and new. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009

    2009

  46. [54]

    Woolgar and W

    E. Woolgar and W. Wylie, Cosmological singularity theorems and splitting theorems for N -Bakry--\'Emery spacetimes. J.\ Math.\ Phys.\ 57 (2016), 022504, 1--12

    2016

  47. [55]

    Woolgar and W

    E. Woolgar and W. Wylie, Curvature-dimension bounds for Lorentzian splitting theorems. J.\ Geom.\ Phys.\ 132 (2018), 131--145

    2018

  48. [56]

    Wylie, A warped product version of the Cheeger--Gromoll splitting theorem

    W. Wylie, A warped product version of the Cheeger--Gromoll splitting theorem. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 369 (2017), 6661--6681

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.