Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 29 references

Transcriptional Response of SK-N-AS Cells to Methamidophos

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Methamidophos exposure in SK-N-AS neuroblastoma cells triggers unfolded protein response, cAMP response, calcium ion processes, and cell-cell signaling, and the data confirm the expected acetylcholine buildup.

desk verdict A useful exploratory dataset and a first look at time-warp causal inference, but the process-level claims rest on technical triplicates and ad hoc filters—worth a serious referee, not a headline. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03841 v1 pith:GFUGGP2B submitted 2019-08-11 q-bio.GN cs.LGq-bio.CBstat.ML

Akos Vertes , Albert-Baskar Arul , Peter Avar , Andrew R. Korte , Lida Parvin , Ziad J. Sahab , Deborah I. Bunin , Merrill Knapp
show 8 more authors
Denise Nishita Andrew Poggio Mark-Oliver Stehr Carolyn L. Talcott Brian M. Davis Christine A. Morton Christopher J. Sevinsky Maria I. Zavodszky
This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-bio.GNcs.LGq-bio.CBstat.ML
keywords transcriptomicsmethamidophosmechanismofactionunfoldedproteinresponsecAMPcalciumsignalingcausalinferenceanomalydetection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that a largely data-driven analysis of time-series transcriptomics, without a pre-existing interaction network, can generate candidate components of a toxin's mechanism of action. In SK-N-AS neuroblastoma cells exposed to methamidophos, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, the analysis points to four candidate processes: unfolded protein response, cAMP response, calcium-ion-related processes, and cell-cell signaling. It also finds the expected downstream signature of acetylcholine buildup, including downregulation of acetylcholine receptors after 18 hours and a DAG/PMA-type response. The authors present these as candidate MoA elements, not confirmed pathways, and use two independent causality-inference methods to propose transcript relations, one of which (DDIT3 to GDF15) matches known biology.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is a multi-stage analysis pipeline built on Gaussian-process time profiles. Transcripts are represented by smoothed log2 ratio profiles sampled at 100 time points, clustered by k-means after PCA compression, and ranked by PCA loadings, autoencoder reconstruction quality, and GAN discriminator confidence (atypical vs typical). A 194-transcript working set, Top20X, is defined as transcripts ranked in the top 20 by at least one ranking function that also show significant change, meaning at least 1 log2 fold change or 1 SD separation at 15 sampled times. This set feeds process-annotation scanning and two causality-inference tools: Siamese convolutional networks for undirected causality plus lag direction, and time-warp causal inference that aligns high/low/nominal event sequences with a Needleman-Wunsch-style dynamic program and bootstrap fold-change confidence. The convergence of the ranking filters and the two causality methods on overlapping transcripts is what supports the process-level conclusions.

What would settle it

Repeat the exposure with independent biological replicates (for example, six per time point) and check whether the 18–48 h upregulation of HSPA5, DDIT3, FOS, JUN, NR4A1, and VGF and the 18 h downregulation of CHRM3, CHRNA3, CHRNB2, GNA11, and GNA12 reappear with the same sign and timing; a failure to replicate would collapse the central process claims. Directly measuring acetylcholine accumulation in the culture medium would independently test the buildup assumption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the transcriptomic response of SK-N-AS cells to methamidophos is organized around late upregulation of unfolded-protein-response and cAMP-responsive genes, coordinated calcium-ion expression changes, and a cell-cell signaling signature, alongside the expected consequence of acetylcholine accumulation. UPR transcripts such as HSPA5, DDIT3, PPP1R15A, and DNAJB1 rise mostly from 24–32 h onward; forskolin-defined cAMP-responsive genes (FOS, JUN, NR4A1, GDF15, VGF, PER1, ZFP36, and others) also turn upward around 24 h; calcium-related transcripts split into an upregulated group (DDIT3, FOS, HSP90B1, HSPA5, JUN, ITPKB, and others) and a downregulated group (EEF2K, HSPH1, RGS4, RIMS3, S1PR3, and others). Acetylcholine receptors CHRM3, CHRNA3, CHRNB2, and GPCR partners GNA11 and GNA12 are downregulated from about 18 h, and cyclin profiles indicate G2 arrest from 32 h. The paper claims its causal-inference algorithms recover a known DDIT3-to-GDF15 relation and propose additional edges that remain unverified.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that three technical replicates per condition and time point are sufficient to estimate separation and fold-change significance; if biological variability between independent cultures is comparable to or larger than this technical noise, some called expression changes and inferred causal edges could be noise.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claims hold, UPR, cAMP response, calcium ion handling, and cell-cell signaling become the prioritized hypotheses for methamidophos' broader mechanism of action in neuronal cells, guiding targeted protein and metabolite measurements.
  • The 18 h onset of receptor downregulation and the 32 h G2 arrest give temporal landmarks for designing follow-up experiments: the early window (0.5–8 h) is relatively quiet, while the key process signals accumulate by 24–48 h.
  • The recovered DDIT3-to-GDF15 edge, if confirmed as causal, links ER stress to the secreted stress signal GDF15 in this cell type, connecting the UPR and cell-cell signaling candidate processes.
  • The two causality algorithms produce complementary network structures (short clustered chains vs longer sparser chains), so jointly used they can prioritize transcript pairs for experimental validation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension would be to run the same pipeline on a positive control (for example, tunicamycin for UPR or forskolin for cAMP) in SK-N-AS cells; the false-positive rate of the anomaly and causality rankings under known perturbations would calibrate how much of the methamidophos signal is specific.
  • The suspected 1 h spike in the raw profiles implies that the choice between raw and GP-smoothed profiles can flip biological conclusions; comparing both views on the same transcript sets is a cheap robustness check that the paper only partially explores.
  • Because the cell-cell signaling candidates (CCL7, CCL13, CCR5, IFNA2, and others) rest almost entirely on the possibly artifactual 1 h spike, direct measurement of secreted factors would be the decisive test of whether cell-cell signaling is a genuine response.
  • The inferred causal edges could be sharpened by promoter binding-site analysis, such as checking whether BHLHE40 and FOS binding sites overlie the UPR and cAMP responders, turning the network predictions into sequence-level hypotheses.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper describes a data-analysis workflow for time-series transcriptomics and applies it to SK-N-AS human neuroblastoma cells exposed to the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor methamidophos. The workflow combines Gaussian-process (GP) modeling of expression profiles, PCA and k-means clustering, autoencoder and GAN-based anomaly rankings, a transcript-selection predicate called Top20X, and two causality-inference methods (Siamese convolutional networks and time-warp alignment). On the basis of 10 time points (0.5-48 h) with three technical replicates per condition, the authors report candidate mechanism-of-action processes: unfolded protein response (UPR), cAMP response, calcium-ion-related processes, and cell-cell signaling. They also report downregulation of acetylcholine receptors after 18 h, which they interpret as a consequence of acetylcholine buildup, and they present inferred causal edges among selected transcripts, including a known DDIT3-GDF15 relation. The paper is framed as both a biological application and a demonstration of novel analysis algorithms.

Significance. If the methodological pipeline is robust, the paper offers a useful data-driven approach for generating mechanism-of-action hypotheses from time-series omics data without requiring a prior interaction network. The strengths of the manuscript include the explicit predicate definitions in Appendix 6.1, the use of multiple independent ranking and inference methods, the reporting of validation accuracy on synthetic data for the Siamese causality models, and an honest discussion of the uncertainty of inferred causal edges. The authors also make a Top20X summary spreadsheet available. However, the biological conclusions are only as strong as the transcript-level significance calls, and those calls rest entirely on three technical replicates per condition and time point. The paper would be more convincing if the process-level and causal claims were either supported by biological replication or explicitly reframed as hypothesis-generating results requiring independent validation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sections 2.1, 2.2, 2.5, and 6.1] The statistical significance machinery is built exclusively on three technical replicates per condition and time point. The GP confidence bands in Section 2.2 and the bootstrap fold-change distributions in Section 2.5 resample those same three readings, so the sep(d,n), o-significant, upby, and dnby predicates quantify only measurement noise, not biological variability. Because Top20X and the subsequent Panther overrepresentation results (Appendix 6.2) and process lists (Section 3.2) all depend on these transcript-level significance calls, the process-level claims in the abstract are not protected against biological noise. The authors should either add biological replication or a variance-component estimate, or explicitly reclassify all process-level and network-level conclusions as hypotheses requiring independent confirmation.
  2. [Abstract and Section 3.3] The abstract states that the data 'confirmed the expected consequence of acetylcholine buildup,' but Section 3.3 is titled 'Conjectured acetylcholine build up' and the evidence is indirect: expression profiles of PMA-responsive genes, downregulation of CHRM3/CHRNA3/CHRNB2 and GNA11/GNA12, and a curated pathway model. No direct measurement of acetylcholine or receptor activation is reported. The word 'confirmed' overstates the strength of the evidence; 'consistent with' would be more accurate, and the claim should be labeled as a candidate consequence.
  3. [Sections 2.4 and 3.5] The causal networks inferred in Section 3.5 are produced by models trained on synthetic data generated from GP templates with mixin parameter m=4; the reported accuracy (0.75 for edge existence, 0.72 for direction) is validated on synthetic data only, not on the experimental methamidophos data. The paper does acknowledge this in the discussion ('We have not yet found evidence supporting or disagreeing with the other hypothesized relations'), but the presentation of 'causal relations' in the abstract and Section 3.5 could easily be read as established biological causality. Please add an explicit caveat at the point of presentation that these are computational hypotheses whose biological interpretation requires experimental follow-up.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.2] The text 'see Appendix 15 for details' should refer to Appendix 6.3 (cell-cell signaling), not 'Appendix 15'.
  2. [Section 6.1] The sentence 'We use three models parameterized by the feature window size (Section ??).' contains an unresolved cross-reference; it should point to Section 2.3.
  3. [Throughout] The spelling of the database name is inconsistent: 'PatherDB' appears in Section 2 and the abstract/Introduction, while 'PantherDB' is used elsewhere; please unify.
  4. [References] Reference [5] contains a typo: 'a wroldwide hub' should be 'a worldwide hub'.
  5. [Data availability] No raw microarray data accession number or repository deposit is provided; for reproducibility, the authors should deposit the raw data in an appropriate public repository (e.g., GEO or ArrayExpress).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the analysis applies prior methods and external annotations to a new dataset, and no central claim is equivalent to its inputs by construction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained in the sense required for a circularity finding. The GP profiles, anomaly rankings, and causal edges are computed from the new methamidophos transcriptomic data, while the candidate biological processes (UPR, cAMP, calcium, cell-cell signaling) are identified by mapping the selected transcripts to external annotations from UniProt, PantherDB, Pathway Logic, and published drug-response gene lists. The method citations [19] and [24] are prior work by overlapping author groups, but they are applied here as tools developed and validated on different cell types, drugs, and synthetic data; they are not invoked as the source of the biological conclusion. The Siamese network is trained on synthetic pairs generated from GP templates and then applied to the real GP profiles, and the timewarp algorithm uses fixed bootstrap thresholds; neither algorithm is fitted to the target result, and the inferred causal edges are explicitly presented as hypotheses requiring further work. The only notable weakness is statistical rather than circular: significance filters rest on three technical replicates per condition and time point, so biological variability is not quantified. That is a correctness-risk concern, not a reduction of the conclusion to its input by construction, and the paper itself labels the replicates as technical. No step was found in which a prediction is equivalent to a fitted parameter, a cited uniqueness theorem is doing the argumentative work, or a known result is merely renamed.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analysis depends on many hand-chosen thresholds (top-20 ranks, 1sd15/udby1 filters, 128 clusters, GAN window sizes, m=4, 85% confidence, 2.0 fold change) and on the assumption that technical triplicates characterize expression variability. No new physical entities are introduced; the causal edges are derived quantities.

free parameters (7)
  • Top20X rank threshold (top 20) = 20
    Transcripts are selected for further analysis if ranked in the top 20 of any PCA, autoencoder, or GAN ranking function; this cut is arbitrary (Section 3.1).
  • Minimum signal filter for Top20X (1sd15/udby1) = 1 SD separation at 15 of 100 GP time points, or log2 fold change >= 1
    Hand-chosen significance criteria used to require a minimum response for inclusion in Top20X (Appendix 6.1).
  • Number of k-means clusters = 128
    Chosen based on cluster size and distribution, not by an objective criterion (Section 2.2).
  • GAN hyperparameters = window sizes 21, 41, 61; feature dims 20/50; 100000 epochs
    Architecture and training choices for the anomaly discriminators; selected by hand and not benchmarked externally (Section 2.3).
  • mixin parameter m for synthetic causality training = 4
    Limits complexity of synthetic training pairs for Siamese networks; authors estimate m=4 is sufficient (Section 2.4).
  • Time warp confidence level and fold-change threshold = 85% confidence; linear fold change 2.0
    Thresholds for labeling high/low/nominal in bootstrap fold-change distributions (Section 2.5).
  • Causality graph cutoff probability and lag direction threshold = not reported numerically
    Used to synthesize directed causal graphs from Siamese outputs; exact values are not given (Section 2.4).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Technical triplicates are sufficient to estimate expression variability for significance testing
    Section 2.1 defines 3 technical replicates per condition/time point; GP SD bands and bootstrap distributions in Sections 2.2 and 2.5 are computed from these readings, with no biological replicates.
  • domain assumption Gaussian process models yield reliable confidence bands for treated and control profiles
    Section 2.2 uses GP sampling at 100 time points to define sep(d,n) predicates; this assumes the GP prior and its variance capture true expression noise.
  • domain assumption Synthetic time series generated from GP templates are representative of real causal relations
    Section 2.4 trains the Siamese causality and lag detectors on synthetic pairs sampled from the GP model with mixin parameter m=4, then applies them to real transcript profiles.
  • domain assumption GO annotations and pathway databases correctly associate transcripts with biological processes
    Section 3.2 identifies UPR, cAMP, calcium, and cell-cell signaling processes using PantherDB, UniProt GO terms, Reactome, and Pathway Logic data.
  • domain assumption The 1h upregulation spike is a possible experimental artifact
    Section 3.1 says volcano plots suggest an artifact at 1h, yet 1h transcripts are partly retained in Top20X; this informal judgment affects interpretation.
  • domain assumption Bootstrap resampling with replacement from three readings produces a meaningful fold-change distribution
    Section 2.5 uses 500 bootstrap samples from 3 treated and 3 control readings to label transcripts high, low, nominal, or unknown.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Transcriptional Response of SK-N-AS Cells to Methamidophos." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GFUGGP2B

@misc{pith2026190803841,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Transcriptional Response of SK-N-AS Cells to Methamidophos},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GFUGGP2B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03841}
}
read the original abstract

Transcriptomics response of SK-N-AS cells to methamidophos (an acetylcholine esterase inhibitor) exposure was measured at 10 time points between 0.5 and 48 h. The data was analyzed using a combination of traditional statistical methods and novel machine learning algorithms for detecting anomalous behavior and infer causal relations between time profiles. We identified several processes that appeared to be upregulated in cells treated with methamidophos including: unfolded protein response, response to cAMP, calcium ion response, and cell-cell signaling. The data confirmed the expected consequence of acetylcholine buildup. In addition, transcripts with potentially key roles were identified and causal networks relating these transcripts were inferred using two different computational methods: Siamese convolutional networks and time warp causal inference. Two types of anomaly detection algorithms, one based on Autoencoders and the other one based on Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), were applied to narrow down the set of relevant transcripts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.03841 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Data analysis schematic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. GP profiles for CYP1B1, TXNIP, EGR1, and CCNB2. The dots with whiskers are the input data. The black/green dotted line is the control/treated mean value (all log2), sampled at 100 time points between 0 and 48 h. The blue dotted line is the (log2) ratio (the difference between the green and black). The grey/green bands around the control/treated lines depict the 2 SD bands. ratio time profile was computed as another … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. In the first distribution, the central 85% of the distribution all lies below the low threshold of 0.5, so the distribution is labeled low. In the second distribution, the central 85% is between the low threshold and the high threshold of 2.0, so this distribution is labeled nominal (treated and control are same). In the third distribution, the central 85% all lies above the high threshold, so the distribution is la… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Timewarp illustration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Up/Down By Charts showing the percent of transcripts up/down by (first crossing the 1 log2 fold threshold) at each measured time point. (Left) computed using the basic time profiles. (Right) computed using the GP time profiles. The results are summarized in [PITH_FULL…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Cell-cycle state: Basic time profiles for Cyclins any of 3 principal components positive or negative; GAN fake (atypical, anoma￾lous) or real (typical), according to one of the three GAN models; or one of the autoencoders-based ranks. Furthermore transcripts in Top20X …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Time profiles of UPR transcripts. From six clusters annotated with UPR related terms, nine transcripts were annotated with UPR related terms: BHLHE40, DNAJC2, HIST2H2BE, HSP90B1, HSPA4L, HSPA5, HSPH1, JUN, and XBP1. Five additional Top20X transcripts are annotated with…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Time profiles of cAMP transcripts [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Profiles of calcium ion related transcripts. Thirteen are upregulated (HTR2B up by 18h; DDIT3, FOS, ITPKB, LDLR, RASA4, THBS2, WNK1 down by 32 h; and HSP90B1, HSPA5, JUN, SYT11, VCAN up by 48 h) and eight are down regulated (RGS4, TGM2 down by 18 h; RASEF, RIMS3, S1PR3…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Response to acetylcholine buildup The result of acetylcholine esterase inhibition in cultured cells is that acetyl￾choline builds up and binds and activates muscarinic and nicotinic acetylcholine [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Down regulation of Acetylcholine receptors The acetylcholine receptors CHRM3, CHRNA3, and CHRNB2, and GPCR bind￾ing partners components GNA11, GNA12 are downregulated starting around 18 h (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Multirole transcripts. PMA, UPR, cAMP, and Ca++ refer to the process groups discussed in section 3.2. UPR includes unfolded protein response; ER stress, protein folding Ca++ includes calcium ion release, sequestering and transport. The P in PC,PR,PM indicate annotatio…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Sample Edges from the Siamese Network The algorithm is more confident about the existence of an edge than about the direction. Thus the fact that we see cycles such as NR1D1-[ZFP36,ARRDC3]- CD68-NR1D1 is not totally surprising. What it says is that more information is…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Comparing transcript sets [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Basic time profiles of cell-cell signaling annotated transcripts [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_15.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    al.: Tensorflow: A system for large-scale machine learning

    Abadi, M., et. al.: Tensorflow: A system for large-scale machine learning. In: Pro- ceedings of the 12th USENIX Conference on Operating Systems Design and Im- plementation. pp. 265–283. OSDI’16, USENIX Association (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    al.: Essential cell biology (2nd ed.)

    Alberts, B., et. al.: Essential cell biology (2nd ed.). Garland Science, New York (2004)

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    In: Cowan, J.D., Tesauro, G., Alspec- tor, J

    Bromley, J., Guyon, I., LeCun, Y., S¨ ackinger, E., Shah, R.: Signature verification using a ”siamese” time delay neural network. In: Cowan, J.D., Tesauro, G., Alspec- tor, J. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 6, pp. 737–744. Morgan-Kaufmann (1994)

    work page 1994

  4. [4]

    Curr Neuropharmacol 11(3), 315–335 (May 2013)

    Colovi, M.B., Krsti, D.Z., Lazarevi-Pati, T.D., Bondi, A.M., Vasi, V.M.: Acetyl- cholinesterase inhibitors: pharmacology and toxicology. Curr Neuropharmacol 11(3), 315–335 (May 2013)

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Nucleic Acids Research 47, D506–D515 (2019)

    Consortium, U.: Uniprot: a wroldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Research 47, D506–D515 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    al.: Generative adversarial nets

    Goodfellow, I.J., et. al.: Generative adversarial nets. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems - Volume 2. pp. 2672–2680. NIPS’14, MIT Press (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 289(3), 1402–14 (2014)

    J.N., R., E., G.J.: Binding of human nucleotide exchange factors to heat shock protein 70 (hsp70) generates functionally distinct complexes in vitro. Journal of Biological Chemistry 289(3), 1402–14 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Knapp, M.: Pla datums (2019), pl.csl.sri.com/datumkb.html, last accessed 2019 March 14

    work page 2019

Show all 29 references
  1. [9]

    Knapp, M.: STM8: A pathway logic model of intracellular signal transduction (2019), pl.csl.sri.com/online.html, last accessed 2019 March 14

    2019

  2. [10]

    Bioinformatics 30(4), 523–530 (2014)

    Kramer, A., Green, J., Pollard, J., Tugendreich, S.: Causal analysis approaches in ingenuity pathway analysis. Bioinformatics 30(4), 523–530 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 498, 388–394 (2018)

    Li, D., Zhang, H., Zhong, Y.: Hepatic gdf15 is regulated by chop of the unfolded protein response and alleviates nafld progression in obese mice. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 498, 388–394 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Experimental Biology and Medicine 237, 14131423 (2012)

    Li, T., Zhao, H., Hung, G.C., Han, J., Tsai, S., Li, B., Zhang, J., Puri, R.K., Lo, S.C.: Differentially expressed genes and pathways induced by organophosphates in human neuroblastoma cells. Experimental Biology and Medicine 237, 14131423 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    al.: Panther version 11: expanded annotation data from gene ontol- ogy and reactome pathways, and data analysis tool enhancements

    Mi, H., et. al.: Panther version 11: expanded annotation data from gene ontol- ogy and reactome pathways, and data analysis tool enhancements. Nucleic Acids Research 45(D1), D183–D189 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    Journal of Molecular Biology 48(3), 443–453 (1970)

    Needleman, S.B., Wunsch, C.D.: A general method applicable to the search for sim- ilarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology 48(3), 443–453 (1970)

    1970

  7. [15]

    Nucleic Acids Research 46(6), e34 (2018)

    Noh, H., Shoemaker, J.E., Gunawan, R.: Network perturbation analysis of gene transcriptional profiles reveals protein targets and mechanism of action of drugs and influenza a viral infection. Nucleic Acids Research 46(6), e34 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    al.: Identification of potential stroke targets by lentiviral vector mediated overexpression of HIF-1 alpha and HIF-2 alpha in a primary neuronal model of hypoxia

    Ralph, G.S., et. al.: Identification of potential stroke targets by lentiviral vector mediated overexpression of HIF-1 alpha and HIF-2 alpha in a primary neuronal model of hypoxia. J. Cerebral Blood Flow Metabolism 24(2), 245–58 (2004)

    2004

  9. [17]

    al.: Uncovering a macrophage transcriptional program by in- tegrating evidence from motif scanning and expression dynamics

    Ramsey, S.A., et. al.: Uncovering a macrophage transcriptional program by in- tegrating evidence from motif scanning and expression dynamics. PLOS Com- putational Biology 4(3), 1–25 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi. 1000021 24

    2008 doi

  10. [18]

    Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 77(4), 729–35 (2013)

    Shinjo, S., Mizotani, Y., Tashiro, E., Imoto, M.: Comparative analysis of the expres- sion patterns of upr-target genes caused by upr-inducing compounds. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 77(4), 729–35 (2013)

    2013

  11. [19]

    CoRR abs/1905.02291 (2019), http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.02291

    Stehr, M.O., Avar, P., Korte, A.R., Parvin, L., Sahab, Z.J., Bunin, D.I., Knapp, M., Nishita, D., Poggio, A., Talcott, C.L., Davis, B.M., Morton, C.A., Sevinsky, C.J., Zavodszky, M.I., Vertes, A.: Learning causality: Synthesis of large-scale causal networks from high-dimension...

    2019 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Talcott, C.: Summary of top20x transcripts in response to methamidophos (2019), http://www.csl.sri.com/users/clt/XYZ/sumG-top20ud1s1x-u6.xlsx

    2019

  13. [21]

    TensorFlow Probability: A library for probabilistic reasoning and statistical anal- ysis: https://www.tensorflow.org/probability

  14. [22]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representa- tions (2017)

    Tran, D., Hoffman, M.D., Saurous, R.A., Brevdo, E., Murphy, K., Blei, D.M.: Deep probabilistic programming. In: International Conference on Learning Representa- tions (2017)

    2017

  15. [23]

    al.: Integrative systems biology approach to identify mechanisms of action (2016), abstract and poster US HUPO 2016 Conference

    Vertes, A., et. al.: Integrative systems biology approach to identify mechanisms of action (2016), abstract and poster US HUPO 2016 Conference

    2016

  16. [24]

    al.: Inferring mechanism of action of an unknown compound from time series omics data

    Vertes, A., et. al.: Inferring mechanism of action of an unknown compound from time series omics data. In: Ceska, M., Safranek, D. (eds.) Computational Methods in Systems Biology. LNBI, vol. 11095. Springer (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    Physiolical Reviews 87(3), 965–1010 (2007)

    Willoughby, D., Cooper, D.M.F.: Organization and Ca++ regulation of adenylyl cyclases in camp microdomains. Physiolical Reviews 87(3), 965–1010 (2007)

    2007

  18. [26]

    al.: Elucidating compound mechanism of action by network pertur- bation analysis

    Woo, J.H., et. al.: Elucidating compound mechanism of action by network pertur- bation analysis. Cell 162(2), 441–451 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    F1000Research (2014)

    Wright, D., Angus, T., Enright, A., Freeman, T.: Visualisation of biopax networks using biolayout express3d. F1000Research (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    Xu, C., Bailly-Maitre, B., Reed, J.C.: Endoplasmic reticulum stress: cell life and death decisions. J. Clinical Investigation 115(10), 2656–64 (2005)

    2005

  21. [29]

    kmr27” identifiesk-means ratio cluster 27. “(+32:*)

    Zak, D.E., Aderem, A.: Systems biology of innate immunity. Immunology Review. 227(1), 264282 (2009) 25 6 Appendix 6.1 Predicate details We define a number of predicates used to select subsets of transcripts and com- pare them. Roughly they concern qualitative measures of signifi...

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.