Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 106 references

Three-dimensional Electro-convective Vortices in Cross-flow

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Strong cross-flow turns 3D electro-convection into 2D rolls via a hysteretic transition controlled by the force ratio Y.

desk verdict A credible 3D extension of electroconvection with cross-flow, but the sharp reported hysteresis thresholds rest on a single-resolution simulation with no convergence data in the main text. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03861 v1 pith:5N7YN44M submitted 2019-08-11 physics.flu-dyn physics.comp-phphysics.plasm-ph

classification physics.flu-dynphysics.comp-phphysics.plasm-ph
keywords electro-convectionelectrohydrodynamicinstabilityunipolarchargeinjectioncross-flowhysteresisdynamicmodedecompositionlatticeBoltzmannmethodelectricNusseltnumber
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that a cross-flow imposed on three-dimensional electro-convection—electrically driven motion in a dielectric liquid with ions of one sign injected from an electrode—acts as a pattern filter: strong enough Couette or Poiseuille shear destroys the vortex components lying across the flow, while vortex rolls aligned with the flow survive unchanged. The surviving state is a two-dimensional rolling pattern, and the 3D-to-2D transition is hysteretic, controlled by a single non-dimensional parameter $Y$, the ratio of the electrical (Coulomb) force to the viscous force. The result matters because it identifies a simple control knob, shear strength, for switching a convection state and sharply increasing charge transport. The paper reports thresholds of $Y_c=772.73$ and $Y_f=438.14$ for Couette flow and $Y_c=300.75$ and $Y_f=213.90$ for Poiseuille flow.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the dimensionless group $Y = \mathrm{Re}\,X$, the product of the Reynolds number of the cross-flow and the ratio of electric to inertial force, i.e., the ratio of the Coulomb force to the viscous force in the streamwise momentum equation. It collapses the effect of cross-flow geometry and strength into one number, and the paper locates the bifurcations by sweeping $Y$ while holding other parameters fixed. The second piece is dynamic mode decomposition (DMD), a data-driven method that extracts growth rates and spatial modes from transient velocity snapshots; the presence of extra unstable modes in weak-cross-flow cases marks the oblique 3D state, and their absence in strong-cross-flow cases marks the pure rolling state. Together, $Y$ provides the control parameter and DMD provides the marker for which side of the bifurcation the system is on.

What would settle it

Repeat the two bifurcation cases (applying shear to an existing square pattern) on a grid with doubled resolution in all directions and compare the $Y$ values at which the oblique 3D state gives way to 2D rolls; if either $Y_c$ or $Y_f$ moves by more than a few percent, the reported thresholds are numerical artifacts rather than fixed physical transition points.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Electro-convection between parallel plates with unipolar injection can settle into three-dimensional square, oval, hexagonal, or mixed vortex patterns. The central discovery is that a sufficiently strong streamwise cross-flow selectively suppresses the transverse vortex component while leaving streamwise rolls untouched, so the system reorganizes into purely two-dimensional longitudinal rolls. The mechanism is the interaction of the vortex's streamwise velocity component with the bulk shear, strongest near the walls; once only $y$-$z$ rolls remain, the cross-flow no longer couples to them, which is why the streamwise pattern survives at any cross-flow strength. The transition is not reversible: destroying an existing 3D state requires a stronger shear than preventing one from forming, and this hysteresis is visible in the electric Nusselt number, which jumps when the moving pattern becomes two-dimensional.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the single-resolution numerical grid is fine enough to pin down the reported hysteresis thresholds, since the main text reports a second-order method but defers grid-convergence and error analysis to supplementary material.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A shear strong enough that $Y < Y_f$ converts every three-dimensional electro-convective pattern tested—square, oval, hexagonal, and mixed—into the same two-dimensional streamwise rolling state.
  • Because streamwise rolls simply superimpose on the cross-flow, their saturated amplitude and charge transport are independent of the cross-flow strength and profile once the transition is complete ($Ne = 1.41$).
  • The 3D-to-2D transition is hysteretic: the shear needed to destroy an existing 3D state is larger than the shear needed to prevent one from forming, so the final state depends on the system's history.
  • DMD can identify the bifurcation threshold from simulation snapshots, because the oblique 3D state has extra unstable modes that the rolling state lacks.
  • The electric Nusselt number rises sharply when transverse structures are suppressed, meaning the 2D rolling state transports charge more efficiently than the 3D oblique state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If $Y$ is truly the controlling group, the same hysteresis should be measurable experimentally by sweeping the applied voltage or the cross-flow velocity while recording current: the $Ne$ versus $Y$ curve should trace different branches depending on sweep direction, with the gap equal to $Y_c - Y_f$.
  • By analogy with shear-affected buoyancy-driven convection, the threshold ratio $Y_c$ might be expressible through a buoyancy-to-inertia ratio, which would let the thresholds be predicted for other body-force convection systems.
  • DMD's ability to flag the extra unstable modes before the nonlinear transition suggests a data-driven early-warning method: monitoring a few velocity snapshots while ramping the cross-flow could indicate approach to $Y_f$ before the pattern visibly changes.
  • The independence of the saturated rolling state from cross-flow strength suggests a superposition principle: the streamwise vortex solution plus the base shear flow may be an exact or near-exact nonlinear solution, which a reduced two-amplitude model could test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper presents three-dimensional lattice Boltzmann (TRT-LBM) simulations of electro-convection between parallel plates with unipolar charge injection, with and without Couette or Poiseuille cross-flow. Using rolling, square, hexagon, and mixed initial perturbations, the authors characterize equilibrium patterns and use dynamic mode decomposition (DMD) of transient velocity fields to extract growth rates and unstable modes. They report that sufficiently strong cross-flow suppresses spanwise (transverse) vortex structures while leaving streamwise (longitudinal) rolls essentially unaffected, leading to a hysteretic 3D-to-2D transition. The hysteresis is parameterized by the dimensionless quantity Y, a ratio of electrical to viscous forces, with reported thresholds Yc=772.73 and Yf=438.14 for Couette flow and Yc=300.75 and Yf=213.90 for Poiseuille flow. The linear growth rate of about 0.896 is compared with prior linear stability analysis [42] and SRT-LBM simulations [49], and the DMD modes are used to interpret the transition.

Significance. If the quantitative thresholds are reliable, this is a useful extension of shear-affected convection studies to three-dimensional electro-convection, with potential connections to Rayleigh-Benard convection and cloud-street formation. The paper's main strengths are its use of multiple initial perturbation patterns, the independent validation of the linear growth rate against established results (Section V.2, Figs. 4-6), and the fact that DMD is applied to simulation data rather than used to fit parameters. The hysteresis characterization through Y is physically appealing and could be practically useful for predicting when transverse rolls are suppressed. However, the central quantitative claims—the Yc and Yf values—rest on a single-resolution numerical campaign, and the manuscript itself defers error analysis to supplementary materials, so the thresholds are not yet fully supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section V, first paragraph; Section V.4, Figs. 17-18] The manuscript never states the grid resolution (grid points, lattice spacing, or dx/H) used for the simulations. It only says the method is second-order accurate in space [87] and that 'Error analysis is provided in supplementary materials.' This is load-bearing because the reported thresholds Yc=772.73 and Yf=438.14 (Couette) and Yc=300.75 and Yf=213.90 (Poiseuille) are extracted from bifurcation brackets only 0.04 in u* wide (3.84 vs. 3.88 for Couette; 3.92 vs. 3.96 for Poiseuille). At such a sharp transition, numerical diffusion at a single resolution could shift the 3D/2D classification by more than the bracket width. Please report the resolution used, provide a grid-convergence study (ideally with at least two refined grids), and give an uncertainty estimate for each of the four Y values.
  2. [Section V.4 and Section VI (Conclusion)] The conclusion states that the transition to 2D rolling vortices is 'observed for all initial perturbation schemes and independent of the domain configurations considered in this work,' but the quantitative threshold analysis is performed for a single configuration: square initial perturbation, Lx=Ly=1.22 m, H=1 m, T=170, C=10, M=10, Fe=3500. The oval, hexagonal, harmonic, and mixed cases shown in Fig. 2 are not used to determine Yc or Yf. The generalization should either be explicitly restricted to the tested configuration or supported by threshold determinations for at least one other pattern and domain size.
  3. [Section II, Eq. (12)] The definition of Y is not developed with enough algebraic detail for the reader to reproduce the reported values. Equation (12) introduces Y as the product Re*X and relates it to shear stress, but the displayed equations do not explicitly show how the dimensionless ratio follows from the dimensional parameters, and the Poiseuille case uses half-height H/2 while the Couette case uses H. Please state the explicit formula for Y in terms of rho0, phi0, mu, u_ext, and the relevant length scale, and report how u*_wall and u*_center were converted into the Y values quoted in Figs. 17-18.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typos and OCR-style artifacts that should be corrected, including 'spanwis' after Eq. (23), 'cro ss-flow' in the abstract and introduction, and 'it’s' in the conclusion.
  2. [Section V.3 vs. Section V.4] The paper should label the two scenarios consistently: cross-flow applied before the perturbation (thresholds u*wall=2.20 and u*center=2.80) versus cross-flow applied after the vortices are established (thresholds u*wall=3.88 and u*center=3.96). As written, the juxtaposition of u*wall=4 and u*wall=3.84 in nearby paragraphs can be misread as contradictory.
  3. [Section VI] The conclusion uses 'u*max=2.20' for the Couette threshold, while the body text uses 'u*wall=2.20'. Please unify the notation for the characteristic cross-flow velocity.
  4. [Fig. 8 and Fig. 15 captions] The captions contain notation errors such as 'z= /2H' and use 't=7.5' with units; since the time is non-dimensionalized, it should be written as t*=7.5.
  5. [Section V.4, Figs. 17-18] The thresholds are quoted to five significant figures (e.g., Yc=772.73). Given that the underlying brackets are only 0.04 in u* wide and no uncertainty analysis is provided, this precision is unsupported; please report fewer digits or provide error bars.
  6. [Section V.3, DMD analysis] The DMD window is described as covering the linear growth region (t*=0-7 for Couette, t*=0-6.25 for Poiseuille), but the text earlier states that the linear growth region ends near t*=5. Please justify why the interval extends into the nonlinear regime, or restrict the DMD analysis to the genuinely linear portion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Y thresholds are observed simulation outputs, DMD is a diagnostic tool, and the key validation uses independent external benchmarks.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that a sufficiently strong Couette or Poiseuille cross-flow suppresses spanwise electro-convective structures while leaving streamwise vortices intact, with hysteresis thresholds reported in terms of the dimensionless parameter Y. Tracing the derivation chain, I find no step in which a prediction is equivalent to an input by construction. The parameter Y is derived from dimensional analysis in Eq. (12) as the product of the Reynolds number and the ratio of electrical to inertial force; it is not fitted from the data. The thresholds Yc=772.73 and Yf=438.14 (Couette) and Yc=300.75 and Yf=213.90 (Poiseuille) are read off from the simulated Ne-versus-Y hysteresis loops in FIGS. 17 and 18, i.e., they are observed outputs of the simulations rather than parameters used to generate the simulations. DMD is applied to the transient simulation data as a post-processing diagnostic; the growth rate (~0.896) is compared with independent linear stability analysis [42] and with a prior SRT-LBM simulation [49], so the validation does not reduce to the paper's own model. The two self-citations, [87] for solver accuracy and [88] for the 2D interpretation of Y and for the hysteresis-closing mechanism, are auxiliary rather than load-bearing: the 3D thresholds and the 3D-to-2D transition dynamics are established by the present simulations, not derived from those references. A genuine limitation, correctly noted by the readers, is that the main text does not report grid resolution and defers error analysis to supplementary material; however, that is a resolution/convergence concern about numerical accuracy, not a circularity in the logical derivation. In summary, the derivation is self-contained with respect to its main conclusions, and no specific equation or fitted parameter is being renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities; Y is a derived dimensionless group. The simulations rely on standard governing equations and idealized boundary conditions. The main uncontrolled freedom is the numerical resolution and the single-domain size, which are not varied in the main text.

free parameters (3)
  • Simulation parameter set (T, C, M, Fe) = T=170, C=10, M=10, Fe=3500 (validation at Fe=4000)
    Chosen from prior electroconvection studies to operate in the strongly supercritical regime; not fitted to the new 3D results, but the specific thresholds may depend on these choices.
  • Perturbation amplitude epsilon = 1e-3
    Set to match previous 2D analyses [87,88]; used for all initial perturbations. The threshold values may depend on this amplitude.
  • Domain size Lx, Ly, H = Lx=Ly=1.22 m, H=1 m
    Chosen so the fundamental wavenumber k=2*pi/L approximately 5.15 1/m matches prior linear stability analyses [42,49]. Restricts admissible modes; a larger domain could contain additional unstable 3D modes.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Incompressible Navier-Stokes with Coulomb force source term
    Governing equation (Eq. 2) in Section II.
  • domain assumption Unipolar charge injection with constant injected charge density at the anode
    Used in the base state and boundary conditions; charge density at the anode is rho0.
  • domain assumption Charge transport includes drift, diffusion, and convection with constant ion mobility and diffusivity
    Eqs. (3) and (7) in Section II; Fe is the reciprocal charge diffusivity.
  • domain assumption Periodic boundary conditions in x and y, no-slip walls in z
    Section II: 'The flow is assumed to be periodic in the x- and y-directions, and wall-bounded z-direction.'
  • domain assumption DMD on a finite time window correctly represents the dominant linearized dynamics
    Section IV, Eqs. (32)-(35); the approximation assumes the data is well described by a low-rank linear system, which is plausible in the linear growth region but is also used in nonlinear transition windows.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Three-dimensional Electro-convective Vortices in Cross-flow." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5N7YN44M

@misc{pith2026190803861,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Three-dimensional Electro-convective Vortices in Cross-flow},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5N7YN44M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03861}
}
read the original abstract

The study focuses on the 3D electro-hydrodynamic (EHD) instability for flow between to parallel electrodes with unipolar charge injection with and without cross-flow. Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) with two-relaxation time (TRT) model is used to study flow pattern. In the absence of cross-flow, the base-state solution is hydrostatic, and the electric field is one-dimensional. With strong charge injection and high electrical Rayleigh number, the system exhibits electro-convective vortices. Disturbed by different perturbation patterns, such as rolling pattern, square pattern, and hexagon pattern, the flow patterns develop according to the most unstable modes. The growth rate and the unstable modes are examined using dynamic mode decomposition (DMD) of the transient numerical solutions. The interactions between the applied Couette and Poiseuille cross-flows and electroconvective vortices lead to the flow patterns change. When the cross-flow velocity is greater than a threshold value, the spanwise structures are suppressed; however, the cross-flow does not affect the streamwise patterns. The dynamics of the transition is analyzed by DMD. Hysteresis in the 3D to 2D transition is characterized by the non-dimensional parameter Y, a ratio of the coulombic force to viscous term in the momentum equation. The change from 3D to 2D structures enhances the convection marked by a significant increase in the electric Nusselt number.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [42]

    Traoré and A

    P. Traoré and A. Pé rez, Two-dimensional numerical analysis of electroconvection in a dielectric liquid subjected to strong unipolar injection, Physics of Fluids 24, 037102 (2012)

  2. [49]

    J. Wu, A. T. Perez, P. Traore, and P. A. Vazquez, Complex flow patterns at the onset of annular electroconvection in a dielectric liquid subjected to an arbitrary unipolar injection, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation 22, 2637 (2015)

  3. [87]

    Kato and K

    Y. Kato and K. Fujimura, Prediction of pattern selection due to an interaction between longitudinal rolls and transverse modes in a flow through a rectangular channel heated from below, Physical Review E 62, 601 (2000)

  4. [1]

    The resulting patterns depend on the non - dimensional parameter T and the domain size ; the latter determines the wavelengths of the 8 vortices

    Electro-convection vortices and transition to rolls: General patterns The equilibrium patterns of EC flow fields without cross-flow were obtained using the initial perturbations described in section III. The resulting patterns depend on the non - dimensional parameter T and the domain size ; the latter determines the wavelengths of the 8 vortices. FIG. 2(...

  5. [2]

    Square and rolling patterns Perturbation of the hydrostatic base state An initial perturbation was applied to the hydrostatic base state after the one - dimensional electrical property profiles were established as shown in FIG. 1. FIG. 3 shows that 9 for cTT , the 2D perturbation (Eq. (21)-(23)) leads to the development of a rolling pattern with flow onl...

  6. [3]

    Cases for two cross-flows are studied

    Perturbation of the hydrostatic base state solution including a cross-flow In this second case, we investigate the EC problem with an initial perturbation applied to the hydrostatic base state after a cross-flow field in the x-direction is developed. Cases for two cross-flows are studied. Only the square initial perturbation (Eq. (24) - Eq. (26)) is consi...

  7. [4]

    Pattern transition after cross-flow application This section studies the transitions of 3D to 2D patterns by applying the cross-flow to already developed square vortex structures, as shown in FIG. 3(a). With weak cross-flow, the systems transitions to oblique 3D vortex structures (oblique transverse and regular longitudinal structures coexist). The increa...

  8. [5]

    Chandrasekhar, Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability (Courier Corporation, 2013)

    S. Chandrasekhar, Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability (Courier Corporation, 2013)

Show all 106 references
  1. [6]

    P. G. Drazin and W. H. Reid, Hydrodynamic stability (Cambridge university press, 2004)

  2. [7]

    E. L. Koschmieder, Bé nard cells and Taylor vortices (Cambridge University Press, 1993)

  3. [8]

    Bergé and M

    P. Bergé and M. Dubois, Rayleigh-bé nard convection, Contemporary Physics 25, 535 (1984)

  4. [9]

    Krishnan, V

    M. Krishnan, V. M. Ugaz, and M. A. Burns, PCR in a Rayleigh-Benard convection cell, Science 298, 793 (2002)

  5. [10]

    A. V. Getling, Rayleigh-B nard Convection: Structures and Dynamics (World Scientific, 1998), Vol. 11

  6. [11]

    Luo, T.-F

    K. Luo, T.-F. Li, J. Wu, H.-L. Yi, and H.-P. Tan, Mesoscopic simulation of electrohydrodynamic effects on laminar natural convection of a dielectric liquid in a cubic cavity, Physics of Fluids 30, 103601 (2018)

  7. [12]

    Marangoni, Sull'espansione delle goccie d'un liquido galleggianti sulla superfice di altro liquido 1865)

    C. Marangoni, Sull'espansione delle goccie d'un liquido galleggianti sulla superfice di altro liquido 1865)

  8. [13]

    J. W. Gibbs, On the equilibrium of heterogeneous substances, (1879)

  9. [14]

    M. G. Velarde and R. K. Zeytounian, Interfacial phenomena and the Marangoni effect (Springer, 2002)

  10. [15]

    Hu and R

    H. Hu and R. G. Larson, Marangoni effect reverses coffee-ring depositions, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 110, 7090 (2006)

  11. [16]

    Girard, M

    F. Girard, M. Antoni, and K. Sefiane, On the effect of Marangoni flow on evaporation rates of heated water drops, Langmuir 24, 9207 (2008)

  12. [17]

    Proctor and N

    M. Proctor and N. Weiss, Magnetoconvection, Reports on Progress in Physics 45, 1317 (1982)

  13. [18]

    Vö gler, Effects of non-grey radiative transfer on 3D simulations of solar magneto- convection, Astronomy & Astrophysics 421, 755 (2004)

    A. Vö gler, Effects of non-grey radiative transfer on 3D simulations of solar magneto- convection, Astronomy & Astrophysics 421, 755 (2004)

  14. [19]

    Shelyag, M

    S. Shelyag, M. Schü ssler, S. K. Solanki, and A. Vö gler, Stokes diagnostics of simulated solar magneto-convection, Astronomy & Astrophysics 469, 731 (2007). 24

  15. [20]

    Borrero, S

    J. Borrero, S. Jafarzadeh, M. Schü ssler, and S. Solanki, Solar magnetoconvection and small-scale dynamo, Space Science Reviews 210, 275 (2017)

  16. [21]

    Cossette, P

    J.-F. Cossette, P. Charbonneau, P. K. Smolarkiewicz, and M. P. Rast, Magnetically modulated heat transport in a global simulation of solar magneto-convection, The Astrophysical Journal 841, 65 (2017)

  17. [22]

    Khomenko, N

    E. Khomenko, N. Vitas, M. Collados, and A. de Vicente, Three-dimensional simulations of solar magneto-convection including effects of partial ionization, Astronomy & Astrophysics 618, A87 (2018)

  18. [23]

    A. Y. Gelfgat and O. Zikanov, Computational modeling of magnetoconvection: effects of discretization method, grid refinement and grid stretching, Computers & Fluids 175, 66 (2018)

  19. [24]

    M. S. Alam, M. S. H. Mollah, M. A. Alim, and M. N. Uddin, Effect of Hartmann number on magneto-convection in a lid driven square cavity with wavy side wall, in AIP Conference Proceedings (AIP Publishing, 2018), p. 050013

  20. [25]

    Zhang and M

    J. Zhang and M. Zhang, On the infinite Prandtl number limit in two-dimensional magneto-convection, Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications 46, 313 (2019)

  21. [26]

    Riley, Magnetohydrodynamic free convection, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 18, 577 (1964)

    N. Riley, Magnetohydrodynamic free convection, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 18, 577 (1964)

  22. [27]

    Pradhan and A

    K. Pradhan and A. Guha, CFD solutions for magnetohydrodynamic natural convection over horizontal and vertical surfaces, Journal of Molecular Liquids 236, 465 (2017)

  23. [28]

    Shankar and I

    B. Shankar and I. Shivakumara, Magnetohydrodynamic stability of pressure-driven flow in an anisotropic porous channel: Accurate solution, Applied Mathematics and Computation 321, 752 (2018)

  24. [29]

    Kuang and J

    W. Kuang and J. Bloxham, Numerical modeling of magnetohydrodynamic convection in a rapidly rotating spherical shell: weak and strong field dynamo action, Journal of Computational Physics 153, 51 (1999)

  25. [30]

    Mahmud and R

    S. Mahmud and R. A. Fraser, Magnetohydrodynamic free convection and entropy generation in a square porous cavity, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 47, 3245 (2004)

  26. [31]

    Sheikholeslami and D

    M. Sheikholeslami and D. D. Ganji, Ferrohydrodynamic and magnetohydrodynamic effects on ferrofluid flow and convective heat transfer, Energy 75, 400 (2014)

  27. [32]

    Waqas, M

    M. Waqas, M. Farooq, M. I. Khan, A. Alsaedi, T. Hayat, and T. Yasmeen, Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) mixed convection flow of micropolar liquid due to nonlinear stretched sheet with convective condition, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 102, 766 (2016)

  28. [33]

    Sheikholeslami and S

    M. Sheikholeslami and S. Shehzad, Magnetohydrodynamic nanofluid convection in a porous enclosure considering heat flux boundary condition, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 106, 1261 (2017)

  29. [34]

    G. I. Taylor, Studies in electrohydrodynamics. I. The circulation produced in a drop by an electric field, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 291, 159 (1966)

  30. [35]

    D. C. Jolly and J. R. Melcher, Electroconvective instability in a fluid layer, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 314, 269 (1970)

  31. [36]

    Malraison and P

    B. Malraison and P. Atten, Chaotic behavior of instability due to unipolar ion injection in a dielectric liquid, Physical Review Letters 49, 723 (1982)

  32. [37]

    Castellanos and P

    A. Castellanos and P. Atten, Numerical modeling of finite amplitude convection of liquids subjected to unipolar injection, IEEE transactions on industry applications, 825 (1987). 25

  33. [38]

    Z. A. Daya, V. B. Deyirmenjian, and S. W. Morris, Bifurcations in annular electroconvection with an imposed shear, Physical Review E 64, 036212 (2001)

  34. [39]

    Adamiak and P

    K. Adamiak and P. Atten, Simulation of corona discharge in point–plane configuration, Journal of electrostatics 61, 85 (2004)

  35. [40]

    P. Tsai, Z. A. Daya, and S. W. Morris, Aspect-ratio dependence of charge transport in turbulent electroconvection, Physical review letters 92, 084503 (2004)

  36. [41]

    P. Tsai, Z. A. Daya, and S. W. Morris, Charge transport scaling in turbulent electroconvection, Physical Review E 72, 046311 (2005)

  37. [43]

    Traoré and J

    P. Traoré and J. Wu, On the limitation of imposed velocity field strategy for Coulomb-driven electroconvection flow simulations, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 727 (2013)

  38. [44]

    J. Wu, P. Traoré , P. A. Vá zquez, and A. T. Pé rez, Onset of convection in a finite two- dimensional container due to unipolar injection of ions, Physical Review E 88, 053018 (2013)

  39. [45]

    Pé rez, P

    A. Pé rez, P. Vá zquez, J. Wu, and P. Traoré , Electrohydrodynamic linear stability analysis of dielectric liquids subjected to unipolar injection in a rectangular enclosure with rigid sidewalls, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 758, 586 (2014)

  40. [46]

    Zhang, F

    M. Zhang, F. Martinelli, J. Wu, P. J. Schmid, and M. Quadrio, Modal and non-modal stability analysis of electrohydrodynamic flow with and without cross-flow, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 770, 319 (2015)

  41. [47]

    Traore, J

    P. Traore, J. Wu, C. Louste, P. A. Vazquez, and A. T. Perez, Numerical study of a plane poiseuille channel flow of a dielectric liquid subjected to unipolar injection, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation 22, 2779 (2015)

  42. [48]

    Wu and P

    J. Wu and P. Traoré , A finite-volume method for electro-thermoconvective phenomena in a plane layer of dielectric liquid, Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications 68, 471 (2015)

  43. [50]

    J. Wu, P. Traoré , A. T. Pé rez, and P. A. Vá zquez, On two-dimensional finite amplitude electro-convection in a dielectric liquid induced by a strong unipolar injection, Journal of Electrostatics 74, 85 (2015)

  44. [51]

    Zhang, Weakly nonlinear stability analysis of subcritical electrohydrodynamic flow subject to strong unipolar injection, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 792, 328 (2016)

    M. Zhang, Weakly nonlinear stability analysis of subcritical electrohydrodynamic flow subject to strong unipolar injection, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 792, 328 (2016)

  45. [52]

    K. Luo, J. Wu, H.-L. Yi, and H.-P. Tan, Lattice Boltzmann model for Coulomb- driven flows in dielectric liquids, Physical Review E 93, 023309 (2016)

  46. [53]

    K. Luo, J. Wu, H.-L. Yi, and H.-P. Tan, Three-dimensional finite amplitude electroconvection in dielectric liquids, Physics of Fluids 30, 023602 (2018)

  47. [54]

    K. Luo, J. Wu, H.-L. Yi, L.-H. Liu, and H.-P. Tan, Hexagonal convection patterns and their evolutionary scenarios in electroconvection induced by a strong unipolar injection, Physical Review Fluids 3, 053702 (2018)

  48. [55]

    Rubinstein and B

    I. Rubinstein and B. Zaltzman, Electro-osmotically induced convection at a permselective membrane, Physical Review E 62, 2238 (2000)

  49. [56]

    Rubinstein and B

    I. Rubinstein and B. Zaltzman, Electro-osmotic slip of the second kind and instability in concentration polarization at electrodialysis membranes, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 11, 263 (2001)

  50. [57]

    Zaltzman and I

    B. Zaltzman and I. Rubinstein, Electro-osmotic slip and electroconvective instability, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 579, 173 (2007). 26

  51. [58]

    S. M. Rubinstein, G. Manukyan, A. Staicu, I. Rubinstein, B. Zaltzman, R. G. Lammertink, F. Mugele, and M. Wessling, Direct observation of a nonequilibrium electro- osmotic instability, Physical review letters 101, 236101 (2008)

  52. [59]

    V. S. Pham, Z. Li, K. M. Lim, J. K. White, and J. Han, Direct numerical simulation of electroconvective instability and hysteretic current-voltage response of a permselective membrane, Physical Review E 86, 046310 (2012)

  53. [60]

    R. Kwak, V. S. Pham, K. M. Lim, and J. Han, Shear flow of an electrically charged fluid by ion concentration polarization: scaling laws for electroconvective vortices, Physical review letters 110, 114501 (2013)

  54. [61]

    R. Kwak, V. S. Pham, and J. Han, Sheltering the perturbed vortical layer of electroconvection under shear flow, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 813, 799 (2017)

  55. [62]

    Druzgalski, M

    C. Druzgalski, M. Andersen, and A. Mani, Direct numerical simulation of electroconvective instability and hydrodynamic chaos near an ion-selective surface, Physics of Fluids 25, 110804 (2013)

  56. [63]

    S. M. Davidson, M. B. Andersen, and A. Mani, Chaotic induced-charge electro- osmosis, Physical review letters 112, 128302 (2014)

  57. [64]

    S. M. Davidson, M. Wessling, and A. Mani, On the dynamical regimes of pattern- accelerated electroconvection, Scientific reports 6, 22505 (2016)

  58. [65]

    Rubinstein and B

    I. Rubinstein and B. Zaltzman, Convective diffusive mixing in concentration polarization: from Taylor dispersion to surface convection, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 728, 239 (2013)

  59. [66]

    Rubinstein and B

    I. Rubinstein and B. Zaltzman, Equilibrium electroconvective instability, Physical review letters 114, 114502 (2015)

  60. [67]

    Taylor, Analytical methods in planetary boundary-layer modelling, Boundary- Layer Meteorology 8, 125 (1975)

    P. Taylor, Analytical methods in planetary boundary-layer modelling, Boundary- Layer Meteorology 8, 125 (1975)

  61. [68]

    Etling and R

    D. Etling and R. Brown, Roll vortices in the planetary boundary layer: A review, Boundary-Layer Meteorology 65, 215 (1993)

  62. [69]

    Kuo, Perturbations of plane Couette flow in stratified fluid and origin of cloud streets, The Physics of Fluids 6, 195 (1963)

    H. Kuo, Perturbations of plane Couette flow in stratified fluid and origin of cloud streets, The Physics of Fluids 6, 195 (1963)

  63. [70]

    Mü ller, M

    H. Mü ller, M. Lü cke, and M. Kamps, Convective patterns in horizontal flow, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 10, 451 (1989)

  64. [71]

    Mü ller, M

    H. Mü ller, M. Lü cke, and M. Kamps, Transversal convection patterns in horizontal shear flow, Physical Review A 45, 3714 (1992)

  65. [72]

    Mü ller, M

    H. Mü ller, M. Tveitereid, and S. Trainoff, Rayleigh-Bé nard problem with imposed weak through-flow: two coupled Ginzburg-Landau equations, Physical Review E 48, 263 (1993)

  66. [73]

    Tveitereid and H

    M. Tveitereid and H. W. Mü ller, Pattern selection at the onset of Rayleigh-Bé nard convection in a horizontal shear flow, Physical Review E 50, 1219 (1994)

  67. [74]

    Mohamad and R

    A. Mohamad and R. Viskanta, Laminar flow and heat transfer in Rayleigh–Benard convection with shear, Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics 4, 2131 (1992)

  68. [75]

    K. Luo, A. T. Pé rez, J. Wu, H.-L. Yi, and H.-P. Tan, Efficient lattice Boltzmann method for electrohydrodynamic solid-liquid phase change, Physical Review E 100, 013306 (2019)

  69. [76]

    Felici, Phé nomenes hydro et aé rodynamiques dans la conduction des dié lectriques fluides, Rev

    N. Felici, Phé nomenes hydro et aé rodynamiques dans la conduction des dié lectriques fluides, Rev. Gé n. Electr. 78, 717 (1969)

  70. [77]

    Felici and J

    N. Felici and J. Lacroix, Electroconvection in insulating liquids with special reference to uni-and bi-polar injection: a review of the research work at the CNRS Laboratory for Electrostatics, Grenoble 1969–1976, Journal of Electrostatics 5, 135 (1978). 27

  71. [78]

    Schneider and P

    J. Schneider and P. Watson, Electrohydrodynamic Stability of Space‐Charge‐ Limited Currents in Dielectric Liquids. I. Theoretical Study, The Physics of Fluids 13, 1948 (1970)

  72. [79]

    Watson, J

    P. Watson, J. Schneider, and H. Till, Electrohydrodynamic Stability of Space‐ Charge‐Limited Currents in Dielectric Liquids. II. Experimental Study, The Physics of Fluids 13, 1955 (1970)

  73. [80]

    Atten and R

    P. Atten and R. Moreau, Stabilité é lectrohydrodynamique des liquides isolants soumis à une injection unipolaire, J. Mé canique 11, 471 (1972)

  74. [81]

    Lacroix, P

    J. Lacroix, P. Atten, and E. Hopfinger, Electro-convection in a dielectric liquid layer subjected to unipolar injection, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 69, 539 (1975)

  75. [82]

    Atten and J

    P. Atten and J. Lacroix, Non-linear hydrodynamic stability of liquids subjected to unipolar injection, Journal de Mé canique 18, 469 (1979)

  76. [83]

    Atten, Rôle de la diffusion dans le problème de la stabilité hydrodynamique d’un liquide diè lectrique soumis à une injection unipolaire forte, CR Acad

    P. Atten, Rôle de la diffusion dans le problème de la stabilité hydrodynamique d’un liquide diè lectrique soumis à une injection unipolaire forte, CR Acad. Sci. Paris 283, 29 (1976)

  77. [84]

    Li, B.-F

    F. Li, B.-F. Wang, Z.-H. Wan, J. Wu, and M. Zhang, Absolute and convective instabilities in electrohydrodynamic flow subjected to a Poiseuille flow: a linear analysis, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 862, 816 (2019)

  78. [85]

    Nicolas, A

    X. Nicolas, A. Mojtabi, and J. K. Platten, Two-dimensional numerical analysis of the Poiseuille–Bé nard flow in a rectangular channel heated from below, Physics of Fluids 9, 337 (1997)

  79. [86]

    Carriere and P

    P. Carriere and P. A. Monkewitz, Convective versus absolute instability in mixed Rayleigh–Bé nard–Poiseuille convection, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 384, 243 (1999)

  80. [88]

    Zhang, X

    H. Zhang, X. Huang, H. Li, and L. Chua, Flow patterns and heat transfer enhancement in low-Reynolds–Rayleigh-number channel flow, Applied thermal engineering 22, 1277 (2002)

  81. [89]

    Chicó n, A

    R. Chicó n, A. Castellanos, and E. Martin, Numerical modelling of Coulomb-driven convection in insulating liquids, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 344, 43 (1997)

  82. [90]

    Vazquez, G

    P. Vazquez, G. Georghiou, and A. Castellanos, Characterization of injection instabilities in electrohydrodynamics by numerical modelling: comparison of particle in cell and flux corrected transport methods for electroconvection between two plates, Journal of Physics D: Applied...

  83. [91]

    Guan and I

    Y. Guan and I. Novosselov, Two Relaxation Time Lattice Boltzmann Method Coupled to Fast Fourier Transform Poisson Solver: Application to Electroconvective Flow, Journal of Computational Physics (accepted for publication) (2019)

  84. [92]

    Guan and I

    Y. Guan and I. Novosselov, Numerical Analysis of Electroconvection Phenomena in Cross-flow, arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.10899 (2018)

  85. [93]

    J. N. Kutz, S. L. Brunton, B. W. Brunton, and J. L. Proctor, Dynamic mode decomposition: data-driven modeling of complex systems (SIAM, 2016), Vol. 149

  86. [94]

    P. J. Schmid, Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data, Journal of fluid mechanics 656, 5 (2010)

  87. [95]

    P. J. Schmid, L. Li, M. P. Juniper, and O. Pust, Applications of the dynamic mode decomposition, Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 25, 249 (2011)

  88. [96]

    P. J. Schmid, K. E. Meyer, and O. Pust, Dynamic mode decomposition and proper orthogonal decomposition of flow in a lid-driven cylindrical cavity, in 8th International Symposium on Particle Image Velocimetry2009), pp. 25. 28

  89. [97]

    Z. Bai, E. Kaiser, J. L. Proctor, J. N. Kutz, and S. L. Brunton, Dynamic mode decomposition for compressive system identification, AIAA Journal, 1 (2019)

  90. [98]

    M. R. Jovanović, P. J. Schmid, and J. W. Nichols, Sparsity-promoting dynamic mode decomposition, Physics of Fluids 26, 024103 (2014)

  91. [99]

    J. L. Proctor, S. L. Brunton, and J. N. Kutz, Dynamic mode decomposition with control, SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems 15, 142 (2016)

  92. [100]

    Zhang, L

    Y. Zhang, L. Liu, Y. Chen, and J. Ouyang, Characteristics of ionic wind in needle-to- ring corona discharge, Journal of Electrostatics 74, 15 (2015)

  93. [101]

    Y. Guan, R. S. Vaddi, A. Aliseda, and I. Novosselov, Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Electro-Hydrodynamic Flow in a Point-to-Ring Corona Discharge Physical Review Fluids 3, 14 (2018)

  94. [102]

    Y. Guan, R. S. Vaddi, A. Aliseda, and I. Novosselov, Analytical model of electro- hydrodynamic flow in corona discharge, Physics of plasmas 25, 083507 (2018)

  95. [103]

    Goodnight, CUDA/OpenGL fluid simulation, NVIDIA Corporation (2007)

    N. Goodnight, CUDA/OpenGL fluid simulation, NVIDIA Corporation (2007)

  96. [104]

    Cheng, M

    J. Cheng, M. Grossman, and T. McKercher, Professional Cuda C Programming (John Wiley & Sons, 2014)

  97. [105]

    Storti and M

    D. Storti and M. Yurtoglu, CUDA for engineers: an introduction to high-performance parallel computing (Addison-Wesley Professional, 2015)

  98. [106]

    J. A. Domaradzki and R. W. Metcalfe, Direct numerical simulations of the effects of shear on turbulent Rayleigh-Bé nard convection, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 193, 499 (1988)

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.