Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 40 references

Symmetry breakdown in franckeite: spontaneous strain, rippling and interlayer moir\'e

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Franckeite's spontaneous ripples are not just out-of-plane buckling but a periodic in-plane strain wave, driven by moiré-modulated van der Waals adhesion between its two incommensurate layer types.

desk verdict Solid experimental strain-anisotropy story in franckeite, but the theory's quantitative agreement claim fails on a period-counting inconsistency the authors missed. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03922 v2 pith:2SOFGV6H submitted 2019-08-11 cond-mat.mes-hall

Riccardo Frisenda , Gabriel Sanchez-Santolino , Nikos Papadopoulos , Joanna Urban , Michal Baranowski , Alessandro Surrente , Duncan K. Maude , Mar Garcia-Hernandez
show 4 more authors
Herre S. J. van der Zant Paulina Plochocka Pablo San-Jose Andres Castellanos-Gomez
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords franckeitevanderWaalsheterostructuresmoirépatternin-planestrainripplinglineardichroismanisotropicconductivitynaturalsuperlattice
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to explain the spontaneous structural anisotropy of franckeite, a natural stack of SnS2-like (H) and PbS-like (Q) layers that are individually isotropic. It shows that the material's periodic ~4.8 nm rippling is accompanied by a periodic in-plane strain wave of ~4% peak-to-peak amplitude, and that this strain pattern makes electrical, vibrational, and optical properties anisotropic: conductance is about twice as high along the stripes, and absorption and Raman intensities depend on polarization. The paper argues that the origin is not an intrinsic anisotropy of the constituent layers, but a spatial modulation of the van der Waals adhesion set by the moiré pattern between the two incommensurate lattices. A continuum elasticity model with a registry-dependent adhesion energy reproduces the ripple, the strain, and the halved strain period relative to the ripple period.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a continuum elasticity model in which the van der Waals adhesion energy between the H and Q layers is a periodic function of local interlayer registry—that is, it follows the moiré pattern—while a shear modulus $G$ and a two-dimensional Young modulus $E$ penalize in-plane and out-of-plane deformations. Minimizing the total energy yields an equilibrium with ripple profile $h(y)$, in-plane displacement $u_y(y)$, and strain $\epsilon_c = du_y/dy$ that are all modulated along the armchair direction, with the strain period half the ripple period. The model's quantitative results use $G V/(L E_S)=128$ and $E V/(L E_S)=45$, both stated as chosen values, so the mechanism is the qualitative moiré-adhesion pattern and the specific quantitative agreement is parameter dependent.

What would settle it

Measure franckeite's shear modulus, Young's modulus, and interlayer adhesion energy independently—for example by nanoindentation, phonon spectroscopy, and peeling or computed van der Waals energy—then compute the dimensionless ratios $G V/(L E_S)$ and $E V/(L E_S)$; if they differ substantially from 128 and 45, the model's quantitative reproduction of the ripple and strain amplitudes is not predictive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that franckeite's rippling and its electrical and optical anisotropy share one cause: as the crystal relaxes to minimize the sum of interlayer van der Waals adhesion and elastic deformation energy, the periodically varying atomic registry of the incommensurate H and Q layers generates both an out-of-plane ripple $h(y)$ and an in-plane displacement $u_y(y)$ whose strain $\epsilon_c = du_y/dy$ is modulated with half the ripple period. The paper reports direct GPA strain maps showing alternating compressive and expansive regions with a 4.77 nm period, matches this with a model using chosen dimensionless ratios $G V/(L E_S)=128$ and $E V/(L E_S)=45$, and then shows the resulting anisotropy: conductance along the stripes is about twice that across them, the flake absorbs light more strongly when the polarization is parallel to the stripes, and Raman modes have two-fold polarization patterns. The conclusion is that franckeite is a natural superlattice in which properties absent from the individual layers—structural, electrical, and optical anisotropy—emerge purely from interlayer moiré physics.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative agreement of the model rests on two elastic-to-adhesion ratios being chosen rather than measured; if independent determinations of franckeite's elastic constants and adhesion energy give different values, the claimed match is a fit, not a prediction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 4.8 nm periodic strain wave is an intrinsic, built-in superlattice potential for electrons and excitons in franckeite, so the material's response cannot be understood from its average structure alone.
  • Polarized Raman intensities provide a quick orientation marker: specific modes peak perpendicular to the ripple direction, allowing crystal axes to be read from an optical measurement.
  • The factor-of-two conductance anisotropy means franckeite devices behave like a natural direction-selective conductor, with higher conductivity along the stripes.
  • Because strain amplitudes near 4% can strongly shift band gaps in Sn- and Pb-based semiconductors, the periodic strain is expected to imprint a corresponding periodic modulation of the band edges.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same moiré-adhesion mechanism should apply to other natural misfit-layer sulfosalts, so the paper implicitly predicts that cylindrite and similar minerals show the same trio of ripple, periodic strain, and in-plane anisotropy.
  • Artificially stacking SnS2-like and PbS-like layers at a controlled twist angle would let the ripple period and strain amplitude be tuned, turning the observed effect into a design parameter.
  • The wire-grid-polarizer picture for the linear dichroism implies a test: the optical anisotropy should track the stripe direction quantitatively in every flake, and flakes or regions without visible ripples should show much weaker dichroism.
  • A clean way to separate mechanism from fit is to re-measure the strain amplitude and ripple amplitude as functions of flake thickness; the adhesion-driven model makes definite thickness-dependent predictions that the present single-thickness data do not yet test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a combined experimental and theoretical study of franckeite, a natural van der Waals superlattice of alternating SnS2-like (H) and PbS-like (Q) layers. Using HRTEM with geometric phase analysis, the authors observe a periodic in-plane strain modulation with a period of about 4.77 nm, accompanying the previously reported out-of-plane ripples of similar period. They also report anisotropic electrical transport (conductance roughly twice as large parallel to the stripes), linear dichroism, and polarization-dependent Raman intensities. A continuum elasticity model is proposed in which the incommensurate H-Q lattices produce a moiré-modulated van der Waals adhesion that drives both rippling and in-plane strain. The authors claim quantitative agreement between the model and the experiments and conclude that the observed structural and electronic anisotropy originates from this moiré-induced symmetry breaking.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a valuable demonstration that a naturally occurring van der Waals superlattice can acquire anisotropy from interlayer moiré adhesion, rather than from intrinsic in-plane asymmetry of the constituent monolayers. The combination of TEM/GPA strain mapping, transport, optical reflectance, and polarized Raman on the same material is a strength, as is the explicit continuum model. However, the quantitative agreement claim is undercut by an internal inconsistency between the model's predicted period relationship and the experimental periodicity, and by the fact that key dimensionless model parameters are chosen rather than independently determined. The experimental anisotropy evidence also rests on very few devices and flakes. These issues are load-bearing for the paper's main conclusion and need to be resolved before the manuscript can be recommended for acceptance.

major comments (4)
  1. [Results, paragraph describing Figure 3] The text states that the in-plane strain ε_c(y)=du_y/dy 'exhibits a period that is halved respect to the ripple profile, in agreement with our observations.' The experimental section, however, reports that 'The periodicity of the spatially modulated in plane strain is 4.77 nm which is in good agreement with the period of the ripple pattern found by direct inspection on the HRTEM image in Fig. 1c,' and the preceding paragraph cites previous work giving a ripple period of ~4.7 nm. As written, the experiment shows equal strain and ripple periods, so the model's predicted factor-of-two difference is not observed. If the strain period is actually half of the ripple period, then the implied ripple period would be ~9.5 nm, contradicting the cited ~4.7 nm value and the direct inspection. This contradiction is central to the claimed quantitative agreement and must be resolved by reanalyzing the GPA profile, the ripple profile, or by explicitly restating what the model is claimed to agree with.
  2. [Figure 3 caption] The caption says that the shear modulus G and 2D Young modulus E are 'chosen so that GV/LES=128 and EV/LES=45.' If these dimensionless ratios are free parameters tuned to reproduce the observed ripple and strain amplitudes, then the amplitude agreement is a fit rather than an independent prediction. The manuscript should either derive these ratios from known franckeite elastic constants and adhesion energies, or explicitly delineate which model outputs (period ratio, stripe orientation, pattern symmetry, amplitudes) are predictions and which are fitted, including a sensitivity analysis over the parameter values.
  3. [Figure 5 and electrical transport] The factor-of-two electrical conductance anisotropy is reported for a single device, and the linear dichroism in Figure 4 is presented for one flake, with no error bars or statistics across devices or flakes. Since anisotropic transport and optical absorption are central to the claim that the symmetry breakdown affects electronic properties, the manuscript should provide at least a few independent devices/flakes and quantitative uncertainty estimates, or explicitly state the limited statistical basis of these conclusions.
  4. [Figure 2 and Methods: GPA] The strain analysis uses the whole field of view of a single HRTEM image as the reference lattice, so the reported strain values are relative to the mean lattice spacing of that region and the mean strain is zero by construction. The manuscript should discuss the precision and possible artifacts of the GPA analysis (e.g., reference choice, noise, finite image size) and justify that the ~4.77 nm periodic modulation is a genuine material property rather than a processing artifact.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figure 3 caption] There is a typo: 'Frankeite' should be 'franckeite'.
  2. [Results, paragraph before Figure 3] The sentence 'The latter exhibits a period that is halved respect to the ripple profile' is ambiguous because 'the latter' could refer to the strain ε_c or to the in-plane deformation u_y. Please spell out that it is the in-plane strain ε_c that is claimed to have a halved period.
  3. [Figure 6 and Raman analysis] The Raman peak intensities are extracted from Lorentzian fits, but no fit parameters, peak widths, or uncertainties are reported. Adding representative fit residuals or error bars in Figure 6b would strengthen the polarization dependence claims.
  4. [Introduction, citation [26]] The reference to 'Ref. [26]' for micro-reflectance measurements in the Methods appears to be a cross-reference to reference [29] in the reference list; please check the numbering consistency.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Quantitative model agreement is partly fitted through chosen dimensionless ratios, while the experimental anisotropy data remain independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Figure 3 caption and theory paragraph, Results (p. 5-6)]
    "The shear modulus G and the 2D Young modulus E are chosen so that GV/LES=128 and EV/LES=45, where ES = - ES' is the maximal adhesion, V is the sample volume and L is the ripple period ... The theoretical results are in quantitative agreement with the experimental observations."

    The two dimensionless ratios are not fixed by independent, stated material inputs in the main text; the caption says they are 'chosen' at the values used in the calculation. These ratios control the computed ripple and strain amplitudes, and L is defined as the measured ripple period. The paper then presents the resulting amplitudes and periodicities as 'quantitative agreement.' That agreement is therefore partly constructed from the chosen parameters rather than independently predicted; the model output is not a free test of the target quantities unless the referenced Supplementary Information supplies independent determinations, which the main text does not show.

full rationale

The central quantitative claim—that the moiré-modulated van der Waals model reproduces the observed rippling and strain—is partially circular because the model parameters that set the amplitudes are chosen rather than derived, and the ripple period itself enters through L. As presented, the 'quantitative agreement' is at least in part a fit. However, this is not a fully circular paper: the strain modulation is measured by GPA, the anisotropy is measured by electrical, optical, and Raman experiments, and these data are independent of the theoretical model. There is no load-bearing self-citation chain; the model is developed and described within the paper and its Supplementary Information. The most serious non-circular problem is an internal inconsistency: the theory text says the computed strain period is half the ripple period 'in agreement with our observations,' while the experimental section reports an in-plane strain period of 4.77 nm in good agreement with the ripple period of ~4.7 nm. That inconsistency undermines the validation claim but is a correctness issue rather than a circular reduction. Overall score 5 reflects partial circularity from the fitted dimensionless ratios, with substantial independent experimental content and no fully forced derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The quantitative model rests on two chosen dimensionless ratios and on the assumption that adhesion follows the moiré pattern; the experimental claims rest on TEM/GPA, transport, optics, and Raman measurements with no deposited raw data or error bars. No invented entities appear.

free parameters (2)
  • GV/(LES) ratio = 128 (dimensionless)
    Figure 3 caption: G and E chosen so that GV/LES=128; this controls the balance of elastic and adhesion energy and sets the theoretical strain and ripple amplitudes. Details are in the SI, which is not included.
  • EV/(LES) ratio = 45 (dimensionless)
    Figure 3 caption: E chosen so that EV/LES=45; together with the shear ratio it fixes the relative strength of in-plane and out-of-plane deformation, so amplitude agreement is fitted rather than independently predicted.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Adhesion energy between H and Q layers is position dependent and follows the interlayer moiré pattern.
    Used in the Results section as the starting point of the continuum model; the local-stacking dependence of the van der Waals interaction is assumed rather than measured here.
  • domain assumption Ripples and strain can be described by a continuum elasticity energy with a single adhesion scale and elastic moduli.
    The model in Figure 3 and the SI minimizes total adhesion plus elastic energy; validity for a 4.7 nm period natural superlattice is assumed.
  • domain assumption The H and Q constituent layers are individually in-plane isotropic.
    The abstract and conclusions rely on this to argue that anisotropy is emergent; the paper does not measure isolated H or Q layers.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Symmetry breakdown in franckeite: spontaneous strain, rippling and interlayer moir\'e." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2SOFGV6H

@misc{pith2026190803922,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Symmetry breakdown in franckeite: spontaneous strain, rippling and interlayer moir\'e},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2SOFGV6H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03922}
}
read the original abstract

Franckeite is a naturally occurring layered mineral with a structure composed of alternating stacks of SnS2-like and PbS-like layers. Although this superlattice is composed of a sequence of isotropic two-dimensional layers, it exhibits a spontaneous rippling that makes the material structurally anisotropic. We demonstrate that this rippling comes hand in hand with an inhomogeneous in-plane strain profile and anisotropic electrical, vibrational and optical properties. We argue that this symmetry breakdown results from a spatial modulation of the van der Waals interaction between layers due to the SnS2-like and PbS-like lattices incommensurability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.03922 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. TEM characterization of the structure of fr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Strain profile analysis of franckeite superlattice. (A) HRTEM image of a franckeite flake down the (100) direction. (B) In-plane strain map along the rippling direction (εc component of the strain tensor) obtained from the HRTEM image in (A) by geometric phase analysis (GPA). (C) Averaged in-plane strain εc profile, calculated by integrating the strain map of panel (B) along the vertical direction, depicting the per… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Theoretical model to explain the symmetry breakdown in frankeite. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Linear dichroism of frankeite. (A) Differential reflectance spectrum recorded as a function of the rotation angle of the linear polarizer. Inset: optical image of the franckeite flake over a Gel-film substrate prior to its transfer to the TEM grid. (B) Differential ref…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: In-plane anisotropy of electrical properties of franckeite. (A)-(B) Optical image (A) and AFM to￾pography (B) of a franckeite flake over a SiO2/Si substrate contacted with Au electrodes. (C) Conductance recorded between different pairs of electrodes. (D) Conductance (l…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Anisotropic Raman spectra. (A) Polarized Raman spectra with characteristic Raman modes from the Q and H phases. Inset: optical micrograph of the flake used for Raman measurements. The black dashed line marks the direction θ = 0º, parallel to the ripples. Arrows indicat…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Science, 2004

    Novoselov, K.S., et al., Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science, 2004. 306(5696): p. 666-669

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005

    Novoselov, K., et al., Two-dimensional atomic crystals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005. 102(30): p. 10451-10453

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    Nature Reviews Materials, 2016

    Liu, Y., et al., Van der Waals heterostructures and devices. Nature Reviews Materials, 2016. 1: p. 16042

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Geim, A.K. and I.V. Grigorieva, Van der Waals heterostructures. Nature, 2013. 499(7459): p. 419-25

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Science, 2016

    Novoselov, K., et al., 2D materials and van der Waals heterostructures. Science, 2016. 353(6298): p. aac9439

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Marks, and M.C

    Jariwala, D., T.J. Marks, and M.C. Hersam, Mixed-dimensional van der Waals heterostructures. Nature materials, 2016. 16: p. 170-181

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Caldwell, J.D. and K.S. Novoselov, Van der Waals heterostructures: mid-infrared nanophotonics. Nature materials, 2015. 14(4): p. 364

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Wang, X. and F. Xia, Van der Waals heterostructures: Stacked 2D materials shed light. Nature materials,

    work page

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Nature nanotechnology,

    Dean, C.R., et al., Boron nitride substrates for high-quality graphene electronics. Nature nanotechnology,

  2. [10]

    Chemical Society Reviews, 2018

    Frisenda, R., et al., Recent progress in the assembly of nanodevices and van der Waals heterostructures by deterministic placement of 2D materials. Chemical Society Reviews, 2018. 47: p. 53-68

    2018

  3. [11]

    Frisenda, R. and A. Castellanos -Gomez, Robotic assembly of artificial nanomaterials. Nature nanotechnology, 2018. 13(6): p. 441

    2018

  4. [12]

    Nature communications, 2018

    Masubuchi, S., et al., Autonomous robotic searching and assembly of two -dimensional crystals to build van der Waals superlattices. Nature communications, 2018. 9(1): p. 1413

    2018

  5. [13]

    Nature Communications, 2017

    Molina-Mendoza, A.J., et al., Franckeite as a naturally occurring van der Waals heterostructure. Nature Communications, 2017. 8

    2017

  6. [14]

    Nature Communications, 2017

    Velický, M., et al., Exfoliation of natural van der Waals heterostructures to a single unit cell th ickness. Nature Communications, 2017. 8: p. 14410

    2017

  7. [15]

    Nature Nanotechnology, 2017

    Prando, G., Van der Waals heterostructures: The natural way. Nature Nanotechnology, 2017. 12(3): p. 191-191

    2017

  8. [16]

    2D Materials, 2019

    Niu, Y., et al., Mechanical and liquid phase exfoliation of cylindrite: a natural van der Waals superlattice with intrinsic magnetic interactions. 2D Materials, 2019. 6(3): p. 035023

    2019

  9. [17]

    Williams, T. and B. Hyde, Electron microscopy of cylindrite and franckeite. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, 1988. 15(6): p. 521-544

    1988

  10. [18]

    ACS nano, 2017

    Ray, K., et al., Photoresponse of natural van der Waals heterostructures. ACS nano, 2017. 11(6): p. 6024- 6030

    2017

  11. [19]

    Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2018

    Gusmão, R., et al., Layered franckeite and teallite intrinsic heterostructur es: shear exfoliation and electrocatalysis. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2018. 6(34): p. 16590-16599

    2018

  12. [20]

    Nanoscale, 2018

    Burzurí, E., et al., Simultaneous assembly of van der Waals heterostructures into multiple nanodevices. Nanoscale, 2018. 10(17): p. 7966-7970

    2018

  13. [21]

    Beilstein journal of nanotechnology, 2017

    Gant, P., et al., Optical contrast and refractive index of natural van der Waals heterostructure nanosheets of franckeite. Beilstein journal of nanotechnology, 2017. 8(1): p. 2357-2362. This is the authors‘ version (post peer-review) of the manuscript: R Frisenda et al. Nano L...

    2017 doi

  14. [22]

    2D Materials, 2014

    Castellanos-Gomez, A., et al., Deterministic transfer of two-dimensional materials by all-dry viscoelastic stamping. 2D Materials, 2014. 1(1): p. 011002

    2014

  15. [23]

    Wang, S. and K. Kuo, Crystal lattices and crystal chemistry of cylindrite and franckeite. Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations of Crystallography, 1991. 47(4): p. 381-392

    1991

  16. [24]

    Makovicky, E., et al., The crystal structure of franckeite, Pb21. 7Sn9. 3Fe4. 0Sb8. 1S56. 9. American Mineralogist, 2011. 96(11-12): p. 1686-1702

    2011

  17. [25]

    American Mineralogist, 2002

    Henriksen, R.B., et al., Atomic-scale observations of franckeite surf ace morphology. American Mineralogist, 2002. 87(10): p. 1273-1278

    2002

  18. [26]

    Physical Review Research, 2019

    Carr, S., et al., Exact continuum model for low -energy electronic states of twisted bilayer graphene. Physical Review Research, 2019. 1(1): p. 013001

    2019

  19. [27]

    Physical Review B, 2018

    Carr, S., et al., Relaxation and domain formation in incommensurate two -dimensional heterostructures. Physical Review B, 2018. 98(22): p. 224102

    2018

  20. [28]

    Scientific reports, 2015

    Kumar, H., et al., Elastic deformations in 2D van der Waals heterostructures and their impact on optoelectronic properties: predictions from a multiscale computational approach. Scientific reports, 2015. 5: p. 10872

    2015

  21. [29]

    Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2017

    Frisenda, R., et al., Micro-reflectance and transmittance spectroscopy: a versatile and powerful tool to characterize 2D materials. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2017. 50(7): p. 074002

    2017

  22. [30]

    Ram, B. and A.K. Singh, Strain-induced indirect-to-direct band-gap transition in bulk SnS 2. Physical Review B, 2017. 95(7): p. 075134

    2017

  23. [31]

    Physical Review B, 2015

    Li, H., et al., Strain sensitivity of band gaps of Sn -containing semiconductors. Physical Review B, 2015. 91(4): p. 045204

    2015

  24. [32]

    Physical Review, 1968

    Rabii, S., Investigation of energy -band structures and electronic properties of PbS and PbSe. Physical Review, 1968. 167(3): p. 801

    1968

  25. [33]

    Meek, and W

    Smith, A., P. Meek, and W. Liang, Raman scattering studies of SnS2 and SnSe2. Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, 1977. 10(8): p. 1321

    1977

  26. [34]

    Mead, D. and J. Irwin, Raman spectra of SnS2 and SnSe2. Solid State Communications, 1976. 20(9): p. 885-887

    1976

  27. [35]

    Libowitzky, and A

    Kharbish, S., E. Libowitzky, and A. Beran, Raman spectra of isolated and interconnected pyramidal XS3 groups (X= Sb, Bi) in stibnite, bismuthinite, kermesite, stephanite and bournonite. European Journal of Mineralogy, 2009. 21(2): p. 325-333

    2009

  28. [36]

    Buchan, and Y

    Efthimiopoulos, I., C. Buchan, and Y. Wang, Structural properties of Sb 2 S 3 under pressure: evidence of an electronic topological transition. Scientific reports, 2016. 6: p. 24246

    2016

  29. [37]

    ACS nano,

    Ribeiro, H.B., et al., Unusual angular dependence of the Raman response in black phosphorus. ACS nano,

  30. [38]

    , Titanium trisulfide (TiS3): a 2D semiconductor with quasi -1D optical and electronic properties

    Island, J.O., et al. , Titanium trisulfide (TiS3): a 2D semiconductor with quasi -1D optical and electronic properties. Scientific Reports, 2016. 6: p. 22214

    2016

  31. [39]

    Nano letters, 2015

    Chenet, D.A., et al., In-plane anisotropy in mono-and few-layer ReS2 probed by Raman spectroscopy and scanning transmission electron microscopy. Nano letters, 2015. 15(9): p. 5667-5672

    2015

  32. [40]

    Snoeck, and R

    Hÿtch, M., E. Snoeck, and R. Kilaas, Quantitative measurement of displacement and strain fields from HREM micrographs. Ultramicroscopy, 1998. 74(3): p. 131-146

    1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.