Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 57 references

Phonon traps reduce the quasiparticle density in superconducting circuits

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Surrounding superconducting resonators with lower-gap aluminum islands cuts quasiparticle noise tenfold and triples quality factors.

desk verdict A plausible and useful phonon-trap demonstration on grAl resonators, but the central causal claim is undercut by a wafer resistivity gradient that is perfectly correlated with trap filling factor. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.04257 v3 pith:W27Q22QS submitted 2019-08-12 cond-mat.supr-con

Fabio Henriques , Francesco Valenti , Thibault Charpentier , Marc Lagoin , Clement Gouriou , Maria Martínez , Laura Cardani , Marco Vignati
show 9 more authors
Lukas Grünhaupt Daria Gusenkova Julian Ferrero Sebastian T. Skacel Wolfgang Wernsdorfer Alexey V. Ustinov Gianluigi Catelani Oliver Sander Ioan M. Pop
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords quasiparticlesphonontrapsgranularaluminumsuperconductingresonatorskineticinductanceinternalqualityfactorlow-frequencynoisequasiparticlebursts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that the density of broken Cooper pairs (quasiparticles) that limit superconducting circuits can be lowered by coating part of the chip with a different superconductor that absorbs high-frequency phonons. The test devices are high-impedance resonators made of granular aluminum, which are unusually sensitive to quasiparticles. Surrounding them with thin-film aluminum islands, whose superconducting gap is smaller, improves single-photon internal quality factors by up to a factor of three, reduces low-frequency noise by an order of magnitude, and halves the rate of quasiparticle bursts. The authors attribute these gains to phonon trapping: energetic phonons in the sapphire substrate are downconverted by the aluminum islands before they can break Cooper pairs in the resonators. If the mechanism holds, it offers a materials-based route to quieter superconducting qubits and detectors.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is the phonon trap: a lattice of thin-film aluminum islands with a superconducting gap smaller than that of the granular-aluminum resonator. High-energy phonons in the sapphire substrate break Cooper pairs in the aluminum, and the resulting quasiparticles relax by emitting lower-energy phonons that cannot break pairs in the higher-gap grAl; the trap thus downconverts pair-breaking phonons into harmless ones. The quantitative argument is a Rothwarf-Taylor rate-equation model for hot phonons and quasiparticles in the resonator and the traps, which yields the filling-factor scalings $1/Q_i = (1/Q_{i,0})\sqrt{1+(\beta F)^2 - \sqrt{2(\beta F)^2+(\beta F)^4}}$ and $\Gamma_B = \Gamma_0 \Lambda/(F+\Lambda)$, with $\beta = 9$ and $\Lambda = 0.18$ fitted across all resonators.

What would settle it

Fabricate $F = 0$ and $F = 34\%$ chips from adjacent wafer regions with matched grAl resistivity, or remove the aluminum islands after the first measurement and remeasure the same resonators; if the quality-factor gain, noise drop, and halved burst rate disappear, the effect is a wafer-gradient artifact rather than phonon trapping.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that non-equilibrium phonons in the substrate, not just stray radiation or direct drives, are a major source of quasiparticles in high-kinetic-inductance circuits, and that these phonons can be removed by lower-gapped superconducting islands placed nearby. The paper demonstrates that increasing the surface coverage $F$ of 10 µm aluminum islands around granular-aluminum resonators monotonically improves all measured figures of merit, with the data following the phonon-trapping model of Eq. (1) using $\beta = 9$ and Eq. (2) using $\Lambda = 0.18$. Specifically, the single-photon internal quality factor rises by up to a factor of three, the $1/f$ noise amplitude drops by an order of magnitude, and the quasiparticle burst rate falls by about a factor of two. The islands are electromagnetically decoupled from the resonators, so the observed improvements are attributed to phonon frequency downconversion at the aluminum gap, well below the granular-aluminum gap.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes the monotonic improvements come from phonon trapping, but the trapped chips were also made from lower-resistivity granular aluminum due to a wafer-position gradient, so material differences could account for part of the effect.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The fitted model extrapolates that a filling factor approaching $F = 1$ could raise single-photon internal quality factors by up to an order of magnitude, not just the factor of three demonstrated at $F = 34\%$.
  • Because the burst rate follows $\Gamma_B = \Gamma_0 \Lambda/(F+\Lambda)$, complete trap coverage could in principle cut quasiparticle burst rates by $(1+\Lambda)/\Lambda \approx 6$ relative to the untrapped chip.
  • The result identifies non-thermal substrate phonons as a controllable source of quasiparticle loss and noise in high-kinetic-inductance devices, pointing to phonon engineering as a complement to radiation shielding and quasiparticle trapping.
  • The same phonon-trapping strategy should transfer to other high-impedance elements, including protected qubits and kinetic-inductance detectors, where quasiparticles are especially damaging.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension would be to etch away the aluminum islands after measurement on the same chip; if quality factor, noise, and burst rate revert to the $F = 0$ values, that would isolate the trap geometry from wafer-level material drift.
  • The reported wafer-scale gradient in grAl resistivity (6 to 4 mΩ cm) is a competing explanation for part of the trend, since lower resistivity changes kinetic inductance and quasiparticle sensitivity; an experiment with randomized trap placement across the wafer would settle how much of the gain is genuinely phononic.
  • The model's two fitted parameters, $\beta$ and $\Lambda$, could be extracted independently by varying trap thickness or material (for example, using an even lower-gap superconductor), which would test the predicted dependence of trapping efficiency on the gap difference.
  • One implication the authors do not develop is that phonon-trap lattices could be optimized as a phononic crystal, potentially engineering the substrate dispersion to further suppress the phonon energies that break pairs.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental study of granular aluminum (grAl) superconducting resonators surrounded by lithographically patterned thin-film aluminum islands intended to act as phonon traps. Four chips with filling factors F = 0, 8.5, 19, and 34% are measured in a reflection geometry at millikelvin temperatures. The authors report that as F increases, the single-photon internal quality factor Qi increases by up to a factor of three, the low-frequency noise amplitude decreases by about an order of magnitude, and the observed quasiparticle burst rate decreases by roughly a factor of two. They fit the Qi and burst-rate trends with a rate-equation model from their prior work, obtaining global parameters beta = 9 and Lambda = 0.18, and attribute the improvements to downconversion of pair-breaking substrate phonons by the lower-gap aluminum islands.

Significance. If the causal interpretation is correct, the work introduces a practical and scalable phonon-trapping strategy for improving high-kinetic-inductance superconducting circuits, complementing existing quasiparticle-mitigation approaches. The raw monotonic trends in Qi, noise, and burst rate are encouraging, and the model is physically motivated and visibly connected to prior work (Refs. 38 and 43). However, the central claim is weakened by a wafer-scale material gradient disclosed in the supplementary material: the chips with higher F also have lower grAl DC resistivity, which independently affects kinetic inductance and therefore the resonator's sensitivity to quasiparticles. Because the filling factor is perfectly correlated with wafer position, the data as presented do not uniquely establish the phonon-trap mechanism. The paper is significant as a demonstration of a promising technique, but the causal attribution needs additional support.

major comments (3)
  1. [Supplementary Material III] The causal claim is confounded by the wafer resistivity gradient reported in Suppl. III. The text states that the DC resistivity varies from 6 mOhm cm at label 0 (F = 0) to 4 mOhm cm at label 3 (F = 34%), and that the resonant frequency increases monotonically along the same direction. For a grAl film, lower normal-state resistivity implies lower kinetic inductance and a smaller kinetic-inductance fraction; the quasiparticle-induced loss rate and the frequency shift per quasiparticle both depend on this fraction. Thus higher-F chips would show higher Qi, lower 1/f noise, and fewer bursts crossing a fixed detection threshold even with an identical quasiparticle density. Since F is set by the lattice design and the chips come from one wafer with this gradient, the observed trends are consistent with, but do not uniquely establish, the phonon-trapping mechanism. The authors should either measure interleaved fill factors on the same wafer, or provide a quantitative correction for the kinetic-inductance difference and show that the phonon-trap model is still required.
  2. [Eqs. (1)-(2) and Supplementary Material II] The fits to Eqs. (1) and (2) are not an independent test of the phonon-trap model. The functional forms and the underlying Rothwarf-Taylor rate equations are taken from the authors' prior paper (Ref. 43), and the parameters beta and Lambda are fitted to the very same data that the model is used to explain. A monotonic improvement with F from any cause, including the resistivity gradient, can be absorbed by these two-parameter forms. The paper reports beta = 9 and Lambda = 0.18 but does not report the fit uncertainties, the covariance, or a comparison against simpler alternative models (e.g., a linear or power-law dependence on F). Without such diagnostics, the agreement with Eqs. (1) and (2) does not provide mechanistic evidence for phonon trapping.
  3. [Fig. 2 and Fig. 3] The experimental design has only one chip per filling factor and no repeated fabrication or cooldown for a given F. The missing B resonator at F = 34% further reduces the already small sample. The noise improvement by an order of magnitude is illustrated for a single pair of resonators (A, F = 0 vs. F = 19%), and the burst-rate reduction is based on ten-hour averages from single chips. The paper should address chip-to-chip and cooldown-to-cooldown variability, for instance by reporting multiple nominally identical chips or by explicitly bounding the systematic wafer-gradient contribution. This is necessary to support the claim that the filling factor, rather than wafer position, is the controlling variable.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title (header)] The arXiv title page contains a typo: 'supercond ucting' should be 'superconducting'.
  2. [Eq. (1)] The square-root expression in Eq. (1) is easy to misread; adding a clear definition of the positive branch and its limiting behavior for F -> 0 and F -> 1 would improve readability.
  3. [Main text, Fig. 1 caption] The filling factor F is described as the fraction of substrate covered by traps, but later the text says 'traps covering as little as a third of one side of the substrate.' Please clarify whether F refers to one side only or to the total chip area, since the traps are patterned on one side.
  4. [Supplementary Material II] In the derivation of Eq. (II.25), the order-of-magnitude estimate leading to the neglect of unity could be stated more explicitly; the notation tilde and the definition of the area AP are introduced in the preceding paragraphs, but a brief summary of the physical meaning of Lambda would help the reader.
  5. [Fig. 2b and Fig. 3b] The fit curves in Figs. 2b and 3b are shown without confidence bands or parameter uncertainties; since the model is fitted to the same data, reporting the uncertainties of Qi0, beta, Gamma0, and Lambda is important for assessing the strength of the fit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the observed trends are empirical; the fitted model and self-citation to Ref. 43 do not force the conclusion, though the reported resistivity gradient is a confound.

full rationale

The paper's claimed derivation is an empirical demonstration plus a phenomenological fit, not a first-principles derivation. The F-dependence in Eqs. (1)-(2) is taken from the authors' prior model (Ref. 43), but Supplement II re-derives the rate equations and defines beta and Lambda; these are then explicitly fitted to the measured Qi(F) and Gamma_B(F) data (beta=9, Lambda=0.18). Because the fit parameters are free, the success of Eqs. (1)-(2) is not an independent confirmation of the phonon-trap mechanism, but it is also not a circular reduction: the monotonic improvements in Qi, noise amplitude, and burst rate are present in the raw data (Figs. 2b, 2d, 3b) before any model is applied. The self-citation to Ref. 43 is not load-bearing in the sense that the model is restated in the supplement and the experimental observation would stand without it. The paper itself reports a wafer-scale DC resistivity gradient correlated with F (Supp. III: 6 mOhm cm at label 0 to 4 mOhm cm at label 3), which is a genuine alternative explanation for the trends and should be weighed as a causal-identification risk, but it does not make the derivation circular. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input by construction; the fitted parameters are not relabeled as predictions. Hence no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on phenomenological rate equations from the authors' prior work (Ref. 43), with two shared free parameters fitted to the data (beta, Lambda) and per-resonator normalization constants (Qi0, Gamma0). No new entities are postulated. The main unproven background assumptions are QP-dominated loss and electromagnetic decoupling of the traps.

free parameters (4)
  • beta (phonon trap efficiency coefficient) = 9 (shared across all resonators)
    Appears in Eq. (1) and Eq. (II.15); fitted to the Qi vs F data. It absorbs rates of phonon generation, scattering, and thermalization.
  • Lambda (phonon relaxation ratio) = 0.18 (shared across all resonators)
    Appears in Eq. (2) and Eq. (II.25); fitted to the burst rate vs F data. It is the ratio of high-energy phonon escape rate to pair-breaking rate in aluminum.
  • Qi0 (zero-filling internal quality factor) = 8.3e4 (A), 1.9e4 (B), 2.0e4 (C)
    Overall dissipation rate at F=0 fitted per resonator in Eq. (II.17).
  • Gamma0 (zero-filling burst rate) = 7.7e-2/s (A), 5.6e-2/s (B), 2.3e-2/s (C)
    Burst rate at F=0 fitted per resonator in Eq. (II.25).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Quasiparticles are the dominating source of internal loss in the grAl resonators (Eq. II.1)
    The quality factor analysis starts from 1/Qi = c N_G/A_G, absorbing all other parameters into c. If other loss mechanisms dominate, the link between Qi and phonon trapping is indirect.
  • domain assumption Aluminum islands are electromagnetically decoupled from the resonators and only affect phonons
    The paper states island spacing is large enough to avoid changing resonant frequency or loading; if the islands also alter the microwave environment, the attribution of improvements to phonons is weakened.
  • domain assumption Substrate phonon propagation is unhindered by the trap lattice, since island size and spacing exceed phonon wavelengths
    Main text: island size and lattice parameter are two orders of magnitude larger than phonon wavelengths of 50-100 nm, so no phononic band-gap effects.
  • ad hoc to paper The Rothwarf-Taylor rate equation model with weak scattering conditions (Eq. II.10) describes the phonon-QP dynamics
    The functional forms of Eqs. (1) and (2) follow from these rate equations and approximations; the parameters beta and Lambda are not independently measured.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Phonon traps reduce the quasiparticle density in superconducting circuits." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W27Q22QS

@misc{pith2026190804257,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Phonon traps reduce the quasiparticle density in superconducting circuits},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W27Q22QS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.04257}
}
read the original abstract

Out of equilibrium quasiparticles (QPs) are one of the main sources of decoherence in superconducting quantum circuits, and are particularly detrimental in devices with high kinetic inductance, such as high impedance resonators, qubits, and detectors. Despite significant progress in the understanding of QP dynamics, pinpointing their origin and decreasing their density remain outstanding tasks. The cyclic process of recombination and generation of QPs implies the exchange of phonons between the superconducting thin film and the underlying substrate. Reducing the number of substrate phonons with frequencies exceeding the spectral gap of the superconductor should result in a reduction of QPs. Indeed, we demonstrate that surrounding high impedance resonators made of granular aluminum (grAl) with lower gapped thin film aluminum islands increases the internal quality factors of the resonators in the single photon regime, suppresses the noise, and reduces the rate of observed QP bursts. The aluminum islands are positioned far enough from the resonators to be electromagnetically decoupled, thus not changing the resonator frequency, nor the loading. We therefore attribute the improvements observed in grAl resonators to phonon trapping at frequencies close to the spectral gap of aluminum, well below the grAl gap.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.04257 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Photograph of a Cu waveguide housing a 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Effect of phonon trapping on resonator dissipation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Effect of phonon trapping on QP bursts. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Gu , author A

    author author X. Gu , author A. F. \ Kockum , author A. Miranowicz , author Y. xi Liu , \ and\ author F. Nori ,\ @noop journal journal Physics Reports \ volume 718-719 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Taylor \ and\ author T

    author author B. Taylor \ and\ author T. Witt ,\ @noop journal journal Metrologia \ volume 26 ,\ pages 47 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

    work page 1989

  3. [3]

    author author J. P. \ Pekola , author O.-P. \ Saira , author V. F. \ Maisi , author A. Kemppinen , author M. M\"ott\"onen , author Y. A. \ Pashkin , \ and\ author D. V. \ Averin ,\ @noop journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 85 ,\ pages 1421 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    author author P. K. \ Day , author H. G. \ LeDuc , author B. A. \ Mazin , author A. Vayonakis , \ and\ author J. Zmuidzinas ,\ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 425 ,\ pages 817 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    Zmuidzinas ,\ @noop journal journal Annu

    author author J. Zmuidzinas ,\ @noop journal journal Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. \ volume 3 ,\ pages 169 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    author author J. M. \ Gambetta , author J. M. \ Chow , \ and\ author M. Steffen ,\ @noop journal journal npj Quantum Information \ volume 3 ,\ pages 2 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Krantz , author M

    author author P. Krantz , author M. Kjaergaard , author F. Yan , author T. P. \ Orlando , author S. Gustavsson , \ and\ author W. D. \ Oliver ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv e-prints \ ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Yan , author S

    author author F. Yan , author S. Gustavsson , author A. Kamal , author J. Birenbaum , author A. P. \ Sears , author D. Hover , author T. J. \ Gudmundsen , author D. Rosenberg , author G. Samach , author S. Weber , author J. L. \ Yoder , author T. P. \ Orlando , author J. Clarke , author A. J. \ Kerman , \ and\ author W. D. \ Oliver ,\ @noop journal journa...

    work page 2016

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    author author M. A. \ Rol , author C. C. \ Bultink , author T. E. \ O'Brien , author S. R. \ de Jong , author L. S. \ Theis , author X. Fu , author F. Luthi , author R. F. L. \ Vermeulen , author J. C. \ de Sterke , author A. Bruno , author D. Deurloo , author R. N. \ Schouten...

    2017

  2. [10]

    author author P. V. \ Klimov , author J. Kelly , author Z. Chen , author M. Neeley , author A. Megrant , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 121 ,\ pages 090502 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  3. [11]

    author author N. T. \ Bronn , author V. P. \ Adiga , author S. B. \ Olivadese , author X. Wu , author J. M. \ Chow , \ and\ author D. P. \ Pappas ,\ @noop journal journal Quantum Science and Technology \ volume 3 ,\ pages 024007 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  4. [12]

    author author A. G. \ Fowler , author A. C. \ Whiteside , \ and\ author L. C. L. \ Hollenberg ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 108 ,\ pages 180501 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012

  5. [13]

    Ofek , author A

    author author N. Ofek , author A. Petrenko , author R. Heeres , author P. Reinhold , author Z. Leghtas , author B. Vlastakis , author Y. Liu , author L. Frunzio , author S. M. \ Girvin , author L. Jiang , author M. Mirrahimi , author M. H. \ Devoret , \ and\ author R. J. \ Sch...

    2016

  6. [14]

    Aumentado , author M

    author author J. Aumentado , author M. W. \ Keller , author J. M. \ Martinis , \ and\ author M. H. \ Devoret ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 92 ,\ pages 066802 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004

  7. [15]

    Barends , author J

    author author R. Barends , author J. Baselmans , author S. Yates , author J. Gao , author J. Hovenier , \ and\ author T. Klapwijk ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 100 ,\ pages 257002 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008

  8. [16]

    Shaw , author R

    author author M. Shaw , author R. Lutchyn , author P. Delsing , \ and\ author P. Echternach ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 78 ,\ pages 024503 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008

  9. [17]

    Catelani , author J

    author author G. Catelani , author J. Koch , author L. Frunzio , author R. Schoelkopf , author M. H. \ Devoret , \ and\ author L. Glazman ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 106 ,\ pages 077002 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  10. [18]

    De Visser , author J

    author author P. De Visser , author J. Baselmans , author P. Diener , author S. Yates , author A. Endo , \ and\ author T. Klapwijk ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 106 ,\ pages 167004 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  11. [19]

    Rist \`e , author C

    author author D. Rist \`e , author C. C. \ Bultink , author M. J. \ Tiggelman , author R. N. \ Schouten , author K. W. \ Lehnert , \ and\ author L. DiCarlo ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Communications \ ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  12. [20]

    Wang , author Y

    author author C. Wang , author Y. Y. \ Gao , author I. M. \ Pop , author U. Vool , author C. Axline , author T. Brecht , author R. W. \ Heeres , author L. Frunzio , author M. H. \ Devoret , author G. Catelani , author L. I. \ Glazman , \ and\ author R. J. \ Schoelkopf ,\ @noop...

    2014

  13. [21]

    Nsanzineza \ and\ author B

    author author I. Nsanzineza \ and\ author B. L. T. \ Plourde ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 113 ,\ pages 117002 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014

  14. [22]

    Serniak , author M

    author author K. Serniak , author M. Hays , author G. de Lange , author S. Diamond , author S. Shankar , author L. D. \ Burkhart , author L. Frunzio , author M. Houzet , \ and\ author M. H. \ Devoret ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 121 ,\ pages 157701 ( year...

    2018

  15. [23]

    Vool , author I

    author author U. Vool , author I. M. \ Pop , author K. Sliwa , author B. Abdo , author C. Wang , author T. Brecht , author Y. Y. \ Gao , author S. Shankar , author M. Hatridge , author G. Catelani , author M. Mirrahimi , author L. Frunzio , author R. J. \ Schoelkopf , author L...

    2014

  16. [24]

    Janvier , author L

    author author C. Janvier , author L. Tosi , author L. Bretheau , author C . \"O . \ Girit , author M. Stern , author P. Bertet , author P. Joyez , author D. Vion , author D. Esteve , author M. F. \ Goffman , author H. Pothier , \ and\ author C. Urbina ,\ @noop journal journal ...

    2015

  17. [25]

    Gustavsson , author F

    author author S. Gustavsson , author F. Yan , author G. Catelani , author J. Bylander , author A. Kamal , author J. Birenbaum , author D. Hover , author D. Rosenberg , author G. Samach , author A. P. \ Sears , author S. J. \ Weber , author J. L. \ Yoder , author J. Clarke , au...

    2016

  18. [26]

    Gr \"u nhaupt , author N

    author author L. Gr \"u nhaupt , author N. Maleeva , author S. T. \ Skacel , author M. Calvo , author F. Levy-Bertrand , author A. V. \ Ustinov , author H. Rotzinger , author A. Monfardini , author G. Catelani , \ and\ author I. M. \ Pop ,\ @noop journal journal Physical revie...

    2018

  19. [27]

    Gr \"u nhaupt , author M

    author author L. Gr \"u nhaupt , author M. Spiecker , author D. Gusenkova , author N. Maleeva , author S. T. \ Skacel , author I. Takmakov , author F. Valenti , author P. Winkel , author H. Rotzinger , author W. Wernsdorfer , author A. V. \ Ustinov , \ and\ author I. M. \ Pop ...

    2019

  20. [28]

    Groszkowski , author A

    author author P. Groszkowski , author A. D. \ Paolo , author A. L. \ Grimsmo , author A. Blais , author D. I. \ Schuster , author A. A. \ Houck , \ and\ author J. Koch ,\ @noop journal journal New Journal of Physics \ volume 20 ,\ pages 043053 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  21. [29]

    author author J. J. \ Viennot , author M. C. \ Dartiailh , author A. Cottet , \ and\ author T. Kontos ,\ @noop journal journal Science \ volume 349 ,\ pages 408 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  22. [30]

    Mi , author J

    author author X. Mi , author J. V. \ Cady , author D. M. \ Zajac , author P. W. \ Deelman , \ and\ author J. R. \ Petta ,\ @noop \ volume 355 ,\ pages 156 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  23. [31]

    author author A. J. \ Landig , author J. V. \ Koski , author P. Scarlino , author U. C. \ Mendes , author A. Blais , author C. Reichl , author W. Wegscheider , author A. Wallraff , author K. Ensslin , \ and\ author T. Ihn ,\ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 560 ,\ pages 1...

    2018

  24. [32]

    Barends , author J

    author author R. Barends , author J. Wenner , author M. Lenander , author Y. Chen , author R. C. \ Bialczak , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 99 ,\ pages 113507 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  25. [33]

    Houzet , author K

    author author M. Houzet , author K. Serniak , author G. Catelani , author M. Devoret , \ and\ author L. Glazman ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.06290 \ ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    1904 arXiv

  26. [34]

    De Visser , author D

    author author P. De Visser , author D. Goldie , author P. Diener , author S. Withington , author J. Baselmans , \ and\ author T. Klapwijk ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 112 ,\ pages 047004 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014

  27. [35]

    Patel , author I

    author author U. Patel , author I. V. \ Pechenezhskiy , author B. L. T. \ Plourde , author M. G. \ Vavilov , \ and\ author R. McDermott ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 96 ,\ pages 220501 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  28. [36]

    Swenson , author A

    author author L. Swenson , author A. Cruciani , author A. Benoit , author M. Roesch , author C. Yung , author A. Bideaud , \ and\ author A. Monfardini ,\ @noop journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 96 ,\ pages 263511 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010

  29. [37]

    Bespalov , author M

    author author A. Bespalov , author M. Houzet , author J. S. \ Meyer , \ and\ author Y. V. \ Nazarov ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 117 ,\ pages 117002 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  30. [38]

    Karatsu , author A

    author author K. Karatsu , author A. Endo , author J. Bueno , author P. J. \ de Visser , author R. Barends , author D. J. \ Thoen , author V. Murugesan , author N. Tomita , \ and\ author J. J. A. \ Baselmans ,\ @noop journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 114 ,\ page...

    2019

  31. [39]

    Moore , author S

    author author D. Moore , author S. Golwala , author B. Bumble , author B. Cornell , author P. Day , author H. LeDuc , \ and\ author J. Zmuidzinas ,\ @noop journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 100 ,\ pages 232601 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012

  32. [40]

    \ Riwar , author A

    author author R.-P. \ Riwar , author A. Hosseinkhani , author L. D. \ Burkhart , author Y. Y. \ Gao , author R. J. \ Schoelkopf , author L. I. \ Glazman , \ and\ author G. Catelani ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 94 ,\ pages 104516 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  33. [41]

    Hosseinkhani , author R.-P

    author author A. Hosseinkhani , author R.-P. \ Riwar , author R. J. \ Schoelkopf , author L. I. \ Glazman , \ and\ author G. Catelani ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Applied \ volume 8 ,\ pages 064028 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  34. [42]

    Taupin , author I

    author author M. Taupin , author I. M. \ Khaymovich , author M. Meschke , author A. S. \ Mel'nikov , \ and\ author J. P. \ Pekola ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Communications \ ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  35. [43]

    unhaupt , author U. von L\

    author author F. Valenti , author F. Henriques , author G. Catelani , author N. Maleeva , author L. Gr\"unhaupt , author U. von L\"upke , author S. T. \ Skacel , author P. Winkel , author A. Bilmes , author A. V. \ Ustinov , author J. Goupy , author M. Calvo , author A. Beno\^...

    2019

  36. [44]

    Rotzinger , author S

    author author H. Rotzinger , author S. Skacel , author M. Pfirrmann , author J. Voss , author J. M \"u nzberg , author S. Probst , author P. Bushev , author M. Weides , author A. Ustinov , \ and\ author J. Mooij ,\ @noop journal journal Superconductor Science and Technology \ ...

    2016

  37. [45]

    Zhang , author K

    author author W. Zhang , author K. Kalashnikov , author W.-S. \ Lu , author P. Kamenov , author T. DiNapoli , \ and\ author M. Gershenson ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Applied \ volume 11 ,\ pages 011003 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  38. [46]

    author author R. W. \ Cohen \ and\ author B. Abeles ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review \ volume 168 ,\ pages 444 ( year 1968 ) NoStop

    1968

  39. [47]

    Deutscher , author M

    author author G. Deutscher , author M. Gershenson , author E. Gr \"u nbaum , \ and\ author Y. Imry ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology \ volume 10 ,\ pages 697 ( year 1973 ) NoStop

    1973

  40. [48]

    author author U. S. \ Pracht , author N. Bachar , author L. Benfatto , author G. Deutscher , author E. Farber , author M. Dressel , \ and\ author M. Scheffler ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 93 ,\ pages 100503 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  41. [49]

    Levy-Bertrand , author T

    author author F. Levy-Bertrand , author T. Klein , author T. Grenet , author O. Dupr\'e , author A. Beno\^ t , author A. Bideaud , author O. Bourrion , author M. Calvo , author A. Catalano , author A. Gomez , author J. Goupy , author L. Gr\"unhaupt , author U. v. \ Luepke , au...

    2019

  42. [50]

    Winey , author Y

    author author J. Winey , author Y. Gupta , \ and\ author D. Hare ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 90 ,\ pages 3109 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001

  43. [51]

    author author Chan, Jasper and Alegre, T. P. Mayer and Safavi-Naeini, Amir H. and Hill, Jeff T. and Krause, Alex and Gr \"o blacher, Simon and Aspelmeyer, Markus and Painter, Oskar ,\ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 478 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  44. [52]

    Kou , author W

    author author A. Kou , author W. Smith , author U. Vool , author I. Pop , author K. Sliwa , author M. Hatridge , author L. Frunzio , \ and\ author M. Devoret ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review Applied \ volume 9 ,\ pages 064022 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  45. [53]

    Hunklinger , author W

    author author S. Hunklinger , author W. Arnold , author S. Stein , author R. Nava , \ and\ author K. Dransfeld ,\ @noop journal journal Physics Letters A \ volume 42 ,\ pages 253 ( year 1972 ) NoStop

    1972

  46. [54]

    Golding , author J

    author author B. Golding , author J. Graebner , author B. Halperin , \ and\ author R. Schutz ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 30 ,\ pages 223 ( year 1973 ) NoStop

    1973

  47. [55]

    Levenson-Falk , author F

    author author E. Levenson-Falk , author F. Kos , author R. Vijay , author L. Glazman , \ and\ author I. Siddiqi ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 112 ,\ pages 047002 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014

  48. [56]

    author author R. M. \ Barnett , author C. D. \ Carone , author D. E. \ Groom , author T. G. \ Trippe , author C. G. \ Wohl , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 54 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996

  49. [57]

    Shahid , author J

    author author S. Shahid , author J. A. R. \ Ball , author C. G. \ Wells , \ and\ author P. Wen ,\ @noop journal journal IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation \ volume 5 ,\ pages 426 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.