Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 91 references

Is the brain relativistic?

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the brain is a curved four-dimensional spacetime, with node activity playing the role of mass in curving it.

desk verdict A clearly written, openly analogical essay applying relativity to the brain; the synthesis is novel but the equations are imported or ad hoc, so it works as a hypothesis generator, not as a derived theory. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.04290 v2 pith:N4BAULNP submitted 2019-08-10 q-bio.NC

Denis Le Bihan This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-bio.NC
keywords brainspacetimerelativityneuralactivitypseudo-diffusionfunctionalconnectivityconsciousnessconnectomeneuroimaging
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that the brain is not best described as a static three-dimensional connectome with an external time axis, but as a four-dimensional 'brain spacetime' in which space and time are mixed. The mixing is governed by $c^*$, the finite maximum speed of action potentials along myelinated axons, which plays the role that the speed of light plays in relativity. Within this spacetime, neural activity is claimed to follow geodesics—locally straight paths—and to spread by a relativistic pseudo-diffusion, so that the mean squared displacement becomes $\langle r^2\rangle=6\gamma D^*t$ instead of the classical $6D^*t$. The spacetime is then curved by node activity through a field equation of the same algebraic form as general relativity, $R_{\mu\nu}-\frac12 R g_{\mu\nu}=-k T_{\mu\nu}$, which lets functional integration, consciousness states, and several neuropsychiatric phenotypes be reinterpreted as geometric effects. If the framework holds, upcoming ultra-high-field MRI could test predictions that ordinary network models do not make.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the pseudo-Riemannian metric $ds^2=c^{*2}dt^2-dx^2-dy^2-dz^2$ on a four-dimensional brain spacetime, where $c^*$ is the maximum conduction speed of nerve impulses. That metric converts the connectome's structural edges into dynamical 'brainlines', defined as geodesics of the curved spacetime; it also defines lightcone-like causal cones that partition each brain event's past, future, and present. Two further pieces carry the quantitative claims: a relativistic random-walk propagator (taken from ref. [65]) that replaces the classical diffusion law by $\langle r^2\rangle=6\gamma D^*t$ with $\gamma\le1$, and a field equation $R_{\mu\nu}-\frac12 Rg_{\mu\nu}=-kT_{\mu\nu}$ that makes node activity—quantified locally through the pseudo-diffusion coefficient $D^*$—generate curvature and thereby steer the brainlines.

What would settle it

Measure the spatial spread of evoked neural activity at several observation times $t$ and under conditions that change $c^*$ (focal demyelination, anesthesia, or targeted stimulation): the paper's law predicts $\langle r^2\rangle=6\gamma D^*t$ with $\gamma<1$ at small $c^{*2}t/D^*$, whereas the classical law predicts $\langle r^2\rangle=6D^*t$; if the data track the classical line with no reduction, the central claim is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is that a finite conduction speed for action potentials makes simultaneity between brain nodes ill-defined, so events in the brain should be located by the interval $ds^2=c^{*2}dt^2-dx^2-dy^2-dz^2$ rather than by independent space and time coordinates. From that premise it derives a phenomenological law for the spread of neural activity: the pseudo-diffusion distance is reduced by a factor $\gamma\le1$ that depends on $c^{*2}t/D^*$, giving $\langle r^2\rangle=6\gamma D^*t$. The paper then elevates node activity to the source of curvature: writing $T_{\mu\nu}$ for the flow of activity and $R_{\mu\nu}-\frac12 Rg_{\mu\nu}$ for the geometry, activity curves the brain spacetime and the resulting geodesics ('brainlines') redirect subsequent activity. The claimed payoff is a single geometric vocabulary for phenomena usually described separately: resting-state integration, conscious versus vegetative states, priming, attention, déjà vu, schizophrenia, and even social coupling between brains.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that neural activity propagates through the connectome according to the same relativistic random-walk law that particle physicists derived for massive particles, with the axon speed limit $c^*$ acting as an invariant maximum speed; the paper adopts this law from ref. [65] by analogy and does not derive it from the biology of axons, synapses, or network dynamics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the framework is right, functional connectivity is dynamic geometry, not just fixed anatomy: the same structural connectome can shift between integrated and segregated states because node activity changes the curvature, and hence the geodesics, in real time.
  • The relativistic term $\gamma\le1$ predicts that the spatial spread of activity grows more slowly than classical diffusion when $c^{*2}t/D^*$ is small, so experiments that vary observation time or alter conduction speed (by demyelination, anesthetics, or stimulation) should see a measurable deficit relative to $\langle r^2\rangle=6D^*t$.
  • Because the cones narrow when $c^*$ decreases, the model predicts a continuum of consciousness states: wide cones for global coupling, narrow cones for the isolated nodes of vegetative states, and intermediate cone widths for minimally conscious states and anesthesia.
  • Supraliminal conduction along faulty connections would reverse the order in which a given action potential encounters nodes, giving a concrete mechanistic account of phenomena such as auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia and déjà vu.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension the paper leaves implicit is to treat the metric in Eq. (6) as an empirical ansatz rather than a derived object; its time-dependent $g_{00}\sim 1/t$ implies an effective speed limit that shrinks with observation time, which could be measured directly with ultrafast imaging or high-density electrophysiology.
  • The field equations are formally identical to general relativity, so known approximation techniques from that theory could be imported: linearized perturbations around a resting-state background would predict 'activity lensing' around hubs, and closed timelike curves would become a testable claim about memory replay rather than a metaphor.
  • The multi-brain interaction term suggests that social coupling between two subjects should obey a metric-distance law: the influence of one brain on another's spacetime should fall off with a geodesic-like distance in an interpersonal configuration space, a prediction hyperscanning experiments could check against plain correlation measures.
  • The model's psychopathology claims could be tested by combining diffusion MRI estimates of local conduction speed with magnetoencephalography measures of event-order reversal in hallucinating patients; the paper makes the qualitative prediction but does not specify the required temporal resolution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a 'relativistic' framework for brain function, in which neural activity flows along geodesics of a 4-dimensional brain spacetime with metric ds² = c*²dt² - dx² - dy² - dz² (Eq. 1). The author argues that the finite conduction speed of action potentials, c*, makes simultaneity ill-defined in the brain, introduces Minkowski-style light cones ('brainlines'), and motivates a 'relativistic pseudo-diffusion' correction to Einstein's diffusion relation, yielding <r²> = 6γD*t (Eq. 5). The paper further suggests that brain-node activity curves this spacetime via field equations analogous to general relativity (Eq. 8), and it applies the framework to schizophrenia, disorders of consciousness, autism, and social interaction, including a 'social interaction tensor' (Eq. 11). The manuscript is written as an essay rather than a technical derivation, and it explicitly states that the extension of relativistic diffusion to the brain 'must remain at the analogy level at this stage' (Sec. 5.2).

Significance. If this framework were made quantitatively precise and testable, it could offer a novel unifying perspective on diffusion MRI, structural connectivity, and functional dynamics. The paper brings together a broad range of neuroimaging literature and makes an explicit appeal to falsifiability, which is commendable. The qualitative simulations in Fig. 8, showing connectivity patterns for different values of c*²t/D*, are evocative. However, as it stands, the central quantitative claims are not derived from either physics or neurobiology, the parameters are unconstrained, and the clinical applications are post-hoc reinterpretations. The framework is therefore best viewed as a speculative analogy rather than a scientific theory with testable predictions.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 5.2, Eqs. (4)-(5)] The central quantitative relation <r²> = 6γD*t is asserted by direct analogy with Dunkel et al.'s relativistic Wiener process for point particles, but no derivation is given for neural activity, and the paper itself concedes that the extension 'must remain at the analogy level at this stage.' No argument establishes that the axonal conduction speed c* behaves as a Lorentz-invariant speed: a biological maximum speed in a preferred frame (the head) does not by itself produce time dilation or a Minkowski metric, and the special-relativistic γ factor has no defined analogue in 'brain frames.' Consequently, Eq. (5) is not supported as a quantitative prediction of any brain mechanism.
  2. [Sec. 5.2, Eq. (6)] The proposed metric update g_μν = diag((6D*)^{1/2}/t, -1, -1, -1) is dimensionally inconsistent. If x⁰ = c*t, then the 00 component must be dimensionless to reproduce ds² = c*²dt² - dr²; if x⁰ = t, then g₀₀ should have dimensions of speed². The entry (6D*)^{1/2}/t has dimensions of m/s^{3/2}, so Eq. (6) cannot define a metric in either convention. In addition, γ in Eq. (5) is never explicitly defined; the statement that it 'depends on (c*²t/D*)' is not a checkable formula.
  3. [Sec. 6.2, Eq. (8)] The field equations R_μν - (1/2)R g_μν = -k T_μν are introduced purely by analogy with general relativity, but the constant k is left undetermined, the stress-energy tensor T_μν is only qualitatively linked to the pseudo-diffusion parameters (T₀₀ ~ ρσ, T_ii ~ ω), and no solution or even a toy-model consistency check is provided. This makes the claim that node activity 'curves' brain spacetime unfalsifiable as stated, since there is no way to compute the metric or geodesics from measurable quantities.
  4. [Sec. 5.3 and 6.3] The applications to consciousness and neuropsychiatric disorders are post-hoc: the model 'explains' normal, minimally conscious, and vegetative states by choosing different values of c*²t/D* (Fig. 8), and schizophrenia, déjà vu, and autism are interpreted by freely invoking 'supraliminal' segments or reduced speed limits. Because c*, D*, γ, and the curvature parameters are free and unconstrained by independent measurements, these are parameterized illustrations rather than predictions. The paper provides no protocol for estimating or fixing these parameters from neuroimaging or electrophysiological data, so the framework cannot currently be tested.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 5.2] The statement that Einstein's 1905 papers on diffusion and special relativity are 'in fact, in conflict' is historically and conceptually imprecise; Brownian motion in the nonrelativistic limit is simply a limiting case of a relativistic theory, not a contradiction.
  2. [References] Several references are incomplete or mismatched: ref. 24 appears to be a garbled citation for a paper on brain networks ('J. Neurosis.'), and the reference for the cortical/cerebral volume ratio cited as [43] in the text appears to correspond to a different study in the reference list.
  3. [Global] The manuscript contains numerous typographical and language errors (e.g., 'Minskowski' in Sec. 4.2, 'humain brain', 'tacks' for 'tracts', 'may fecund models') and would benefit from careful copyediting before any resubmission.
  4. [Fig. 8] The caption of Fig. 8 lists values of c*²t/D* without specifying the units or the precise simulation parameters; since D* and c* are model parameters, this makes the figure difficult to reproduce.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the quantitative core is imported from independent relativistic-diffusion work and the brain-specific extensions are explicitly analogical, not derived from the model's own outputs.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative relation, Eq. (5), is taken from Dunkel et al.'s independently derived relativistic Wiener process, and the paper explicitly states that the extension to the brain 'must remain at the analogy level at this stage.' Eq. (3) is Einstein's classical diffusion relation, and the field equations (8)-(11) are proposed by analogy with general relativity rather than deduced from brain data. Parameters c*, D*, and gamma are not fitted to any subset of data and then used to 'predict' the same quantity; rather, they define simulations whose outputs are qualitatively compared with published fMRI/DTI findings. The main weakness is underdetermination and a missing derivation for the brain-spacetime translation, not circularity. Self-citations such as IVIM and diffusion MRI provide independent experimental or methodological background, and none functions as an unverified premise that forces the conclusion. The metric update in Eq. (6) is dimensionally inconsistent and unjustified, but this is a correctness or derivation gap rather than circularity: it is not claimed to be derived from Eq. (5) and then used to recover Eq. (5).

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The model's central quantitative content rests on free parameters (c*, D*, gamma, k, Lambda) that are not measured or constrained by data, and on the unproven analogy that physics of relativistic diffusion and general relativity apply to neural activity. The 'predictions' about consciousness and disorders are qualitative illustrations that use these parameters to mimic observed states, so the framework does not currently provide falsifiable, quantitative predictions.

free parameters (5)
  • c*
    Brain speed limit for action potentials; varies with myelination and pathology; treated as the analog of light speed but never measured or fixed for any prediction.
  • D*
    Pseudo-diffusion coefficient for neural activity; defined via Eq [7] using node density, cross-section, and firing rate, but those quantities are not measured; central to connectivity predictions.
  • gamma
    Relativistic factor in Eq [5]; claimed to be less than 1 and depend on c*^2 t / D*, but no explicit formula is given.
  • k
    Coupling constant in the brain field equations Eq [8]; the paper states it is 'to be determined'.
  • Lambda
    Cosmological-constant-like term introduced in Eq [9] to model social interactions via T'_mu_nu; no constraint or measurement is proposed.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The brain can be described as a 4D pseudo-Riemannian manifold with a Minkowski metric ds^2 = c*^2 dt^2 - dx^2 - dy^2 - dz^2.
    Introduced in Sec 4.1, Eq [1]-[2]; this is the foundational geometric premise for the entire framework.
  • domain assumption There exists a finite maximum speed c* for neural activity, analogous to the speed of light.
    Argued in Sec 3.2 from myelinated axon conduction; used to define causal cones and the brain spacetime structure.
  • domain assumption Dunkel et al.'s relativistic diffusion propagator, developed for physical particles, applies to neural activity in the brain.
    Invoked in Sec 5.2, Eq [4]; the author concedes the extension 'must remain at the analogy level at this stage', but the model's key result Eq [5] depends on this transfer.
  • ad hoc to paper Einstein's field equations apply by analogy to brain spacetime, so that node activity sources curvature.
    Stated in Sec 6.2, Eq [8]; no derivation or scaling argument connects neural activity to a stress-energy tensor beyond the analogy.
invented entities (3)
  • Brain spacetime (4D pseudo-Riemannian manifold)
    purpose: Unifies brain space (anatomy) and time (conduction delays) into a single geometric framework for neural activity.
    A mathematical abstraction; the paper provides no falsifiable handle that distinguishes this entity from ordinary space-time-separated network models.
  • Social interaction tensor T'_mu_nu
    purpose: Models how other brains curve an individual's brain spacetime through communication.
    Introduced in Sec 6.3.3, Eqs [9]-[11]; it is defined formally but has no measurable content or independent confirmation.
  • Neural mass (virtual mass associated with node activity)
    purpose: Serves as the source of brain spacetime curvature, analogous to gravitational mass.
    The paper explicitly says one 'may virtually associate' node activity with neural mass (Sec 6.2); it is a rhetorical device, not an observable.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Is the brain relativistic?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N4BAULNP

@misc{pith2026190804290,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Is the brain relativistic?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N4BAULNP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.04290}
}
read the original abstract

Considering the very large body of knowledge which neuroimaging has put at our fingertips over the last three decades we looked at the brain with a fresh view which could unveil those 'old' things in new ways, in a framework which could help us making predictions tailored made for a scrutiny with the outstanding imaging instruments to come, such as ultra high field MRI. By doing so, switching back and forth between physics and neurobiology, we came across the view that time and space in the brain, as in the Universe, were, indeed, tightly mingled, and could fade away to be unified through a brain 'spacetime'. Considering that there is a speed limit for action potentials flowing along myelinated axons further thinking led us to envision that this 4-dimensional brain spacetime would obey a kind of relativistic pseudo-diffusion principle and present a functional curvature governed by brain activity, in a similar way gravitational masses give our 4-dimensional Universe spacetime its curvature. We then looked at how this whole-brain framework may shed light on brain dysfunction phenotypes (clinical expression of diseases) observed in some neuropsychiatric and consciousness disorders.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.04290 by the authors.

Figure 10
Figure 10. Curved brain spacetime and related geodesics Schematic view of 2 brains figuring how brain activity issued by nodes from one brain curved spacetime could interact with nodes from another brain, curving its spacetime, and reciprocally, through body interactions in space or time (dotted orange straight lines). 7. Conclusion Even the best of physical theories are only an approximation of the truth. Such theories, syste… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Akiyama K. et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole. The Astrophysics Journal Letters, 875:L1 (17pp), 2019

    2019

  2. [2]

    Feldgleichungen der Gravitation

    Einstein A. Feldgleichungen der Gravitation. Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Sitzungsberichte, 1915 (part 2), 844–847

    1915

  3. [3]

    Human brain MRI at 500MHz, scientific perspectives and technological challenges

    Le Bihan D, Schild T. Human brain MRI at 500MHz, scientific perspectives and technological challenges. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 2017, 30:033003 (20pp)

    2017

  4. [4]

    Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging

    Ogawa, S, Tank DW, Menon R, Ellerman JM, Kim SG, Merkle H, Ugurbil K. Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1992; 89, 5951–5955

    1992

  5. [5]

    Imagerie de diffusion in vivo par résonance magnétique nucléaire

    Le Bihan D, Breton E. Imagerie de diffusion in vivo par résonance magnétique nucléaire. C R Acad Sci (Paris) 1985; 301(15): 1109-1112

    1985

  6. [6]

    Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen Annalen der Physik (ser

    Einstein A (a). Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen Annalen der Physik (ser. 4), 1905, 17 : 549–560

    1905

  7. [7]

    Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI

    Le Bihan D. Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2003 ; 4: 469–480

    2003

  8. [8]

    MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging

    Basser PJ, Matiello J, Le Bihan D. MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys J. 1994 Jan;66(1):259-67

    1994

Show all 91 references
  1. [9]

    Diffusion MRI: what water tells us about the brain

    Le Bihan, D. Diffusion MRI: what water tells us about the brain. EMBO Mol. Med. 2014; 6 : 569-573

    2014

  2. [10]

    Greicius, Ben Krasnow, Allan L

    Michael D. Greicius, Ben Krasnow, Allan L. Reiss, and Vinod Menon. Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. PNAS January 7, 2003 100 (1) 253-258

    2003

  3. [11]

    Sur le principe des localisations cérébrales

    Broca P. Sur le principe des localisations cérébrales. Bulletin de la Société d’Anthropologie. 1861 ; tome II: 190-204

  4. [12]

    Histologie du système nerveux de l’homme et des vertébrés

    Y Cajal RS. Histologie du système nerveux de l’homme et des vertébrés. 1909, Maloine, Paris

    1909

  5. [13]

    Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde

    Brodmann K. Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde. 1909; Johan Ambrosius Barth, Meipzig

    1909

  6. [14]

    Centenary of Brodmann's map—conception and fate

    Zilles K, Amunts K. Centenary of Brodmann's map—conception and fate. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2010;11(2):139-45

    2010

  7. [15]

    A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex

    Glasser MF, Coalson TS, Robinson EC, Hacker CD, Harwell J, Yacoub E, Ugurbil K, Andresson J, Beckmann CF, Jenkinson M, Smith SM, Van Essen DC. A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex. Nature 2016; 536: 171-178

    2016

  8. [16]

    The network architecture of the human brain is modularly encoded in the genome (arXiv preprint 1905.07606)

    Bertolero MA, Blevins AS, Baum GL, Gur RC, Gur, RE, Roalf DR, Satterthwaite TD, Basset DS. The network architecture of the human brain is modularly encoded in the genome (arXiv preprint 1905.07606)

    1905 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid

    Watson JD, Crick FHC. Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid. Nature 1953; 171: 737-738

    1953

  10. [18]

    Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex

    Hubel, D. H.; Wiesel, T. N."Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex". The Journal of Physiology. 1962; 160 (45): 106–154

    1962

  11. [19]

    A transcriptional signature of hub connectivity in the mouse connectome

    Fulcher BD and Fornito A. A transcriptional signature of hub connectivity in the mouse connectome. PNAS 2016 ; 113 (5) : 1435-1440

    2016

  12. [20]

    Network hubs in the human brain

    van den Heuvel MP, Sporns O. Network hubs in the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013; 17(12):683-96

    2013

  13. [21]

    Structural and Functional Brain Netwoks: From Connections to Cognition

    Park HJ, Friston F. Structural and Functional Brain Netwoks: From Connections to Cognition. Science 2013; 342: 579-587

    2013

  14. [22]

    A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve

    Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J. Physiology 1952; 117(4): 500- 544

    1952

  15. [23]

    Scaling brain size, keeping timing: evolutionary preservation of brain rhythms

    Buzsáki G, Logothetis N, Singer W. Scaling brain size, keeping timing: evolutionary preservation of brain rhythms. Neuron. 2013, 80(3):751-64

    2013

  16. [24]

    Chard S, Salvador R, Witcher B, Suckling J, Bulllmore Ed. J. Neurosis. 2663-72, 2006

    2006

  17. [25]

    The Dynamic Brain: From Spiking Neurons to Neural Masses and Cortical Fields

    Deco G, Jirsa VK, Robinson PA, Breakspear M, Friston K. The Dynamic Brain: From Spiking Neurons to Neural Masses and Cortical Fields. PLoS Comput. 2008: Biol. 4(8): e1000092

    2008

  18. [26]

    Rethinking segregation and integration: contributions of whole-brain modelling

    Deco G, Tononi G, Boly M, Kringelbach ML. Rethinking segregation and integration: contributions of whole-brain modelling. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2015; 16: 430- 438

    2015

  19. [27]

    Towards a Neuronal Gauge Theory

    Sengupta B, Tozzi, A, Cooray GK, Douglas PK, Friston KJ. Towards a Neuronal Gauge Theory. PloS Biology 2016; 14(3): e1002400

    2016

  20. [28]

    Dynamic models of large-scale brain activity

    Breakspear M. Dynamic models of large-scale brain activity. Nature Neuroscience. 2017; 20(3): 340-352

    2017

  21. [29]

    On the nature and use of models in network neuroscience

    Bassett DS, Zurn P, Gold JI. On the nature and use of models in network neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2018; 19(9): 566-578

    2018

  22. [30]

    Buonomano D, Your Brain is a Time Machine, WW Norton & Company, New York 2017

    2017

  23. [31]

    Relative Conduction Velocities of Small Myelinated and Non-myelinated Fibres in the Central Nervous System

    Waxman SG, Bennett MVL. Relative Conduction Velocities of Small Myelinated and Non-myelinated Fibres in the Central Nervous System. Nature New Biology 1972 ; 238 : 217–219

    1972

  24. [32]

    Annual Review of Biophysics and Bioengineering, 9: 143-179, 1980

    Swallow HA, Kocsis JD, Waxman SG, Modulation of impulse conduction along the axonal tree. Annual Review of Biophysics and Bioengineering, 9: 143-179, 1980

    1980

  25. [33]

    Wiring Optimization in Cortical Circuits

    Chklovskii DB, Schikorski T, Stevens CF. Wiring Optimization in Cortical Circuits. Neuron, 2002 ; 34 : 341-347

    2002

  26. [34]

    Spatial Embedding and Wiring Cost Constrain the Functional Layout of the Cortical Network of Rodents and Primates

    Horvat S, Gamanut R, Ercsey-Ravasz M, Magrou L, Gamanut B, Van Essen DC, Burkhalter A, Knoblauch K, Torockkai Z, Kennedy H. Spatial Embedding and Wiring Cost Constrain the Functional Layout of the Cortical Network of Rodents and Primates. PLoS Bio. 2016; 14(7): e1002512

    2016

  27. [35]

    Vision Res., 1999; 39 : 3673-3680

    McCulloch D, Orbach H, Skarf B, Maturation of the pattern-reversal vep in human infants: a theoretical framework. Vision Res., 1999; 39 : 3673-3680

    1999

  28. [36]

    Dubois J, Hertz-Pannier L, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Cointepas Y, Le Bihan D. Assessment of the early organization and maturation of infants' cerebral white matter fiber bundles: A feasibility study using quantitative diffusion tensor imaging and tractography. Neuroimage. 2006 May 1...

    2006

  29. [37]

    Nonoptimal Component Placement, but Short Processing Paths, due to Long-Distance Projections in Neural Systems

    Kaiser M, Hilgetag CC. Nonoptimal Component Placement, but Short Processing Paths, due to Long-Distance Projections in Neural Systems. Plos Compt. Biol. 2006 ; 2(7): e95 : doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020095

    2006 doi

  30. [38]

    The Wiring Economy Principle: Connectivity Determines Anatomy in the Human Brain

    Raj A, Chen Y. The Wiring Economy Principle: Connectivity Determines Anatomy in the Human Brain. PLoS ONE 2011; 6(9): e14832

    2011

  31. [39]

    Language discrimination by newborns

    Ramus F. Language discrimination by newborns. Annual Review of Language Acquisition. 2002; 2: 85-115

    2002

  32. [40]

    Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing- dependent synaptic plasticity

    Song S, Miller KD, Abbott LF. Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing- dependent synaptic plasticity. Nat Neurosci 1996: 16; 1936-1947

    1996

  33. [41]

    Memory capacity in neural network models: Rigorous lower bounds

    Newman CM. Memory capacity in neural network models: Rigorous lower bounds. Neural Netw. 1988: 1; 223-238

    1988

  34. [42]

    Training induces changes in white-matter architecture

    School J, Klein MC, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H. Training induces changes in white-matter architecture. Nat Neurosci. 2009: 12; 1370-1371.\

    2009

  35. [43]

    A 3D population-based brain atlas of the mouse lemur primate with examples of applications in aging studies and comparative anatomy

    Nadkarni NA, Bougacha S, Garin C, Dhenain M, Picq JL. A 3D population-based brain atlas of the mouse lemur primate with examples of applications in aging studies and comparative anatomy. NeuroImage 2019 : 185(15) :85-95

    2019

  36. [44]

    Noise during Rest Enables the Exploration of the Brain’s Dynamic Repertoire

    Ghosh A, Rho Y, McIntosh AR, Kotter R, Jirsa VK. Noise during Rest Enables the Exploration of the Brain’s Dynamic Repertoire. PloS Comput. Biol. 2008; 4(10): e1000196

    2008

  37. [45]

    Spatial Embedding Imposes Constraints on Neuronal Network Architectures

    Stiso J, Bassett DS. Spatial Embedding Imposes Constraints on Neuronal Network Architectures. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2018; 22(12): 1127-1141

    2018

  38. [46]

    Critical geometry of a thermal big bang

    Afshordi N, Magueijo. Critical geometry of a thermal big bang. Phys. Rev. D 2016; 94, 101301(R)

    2016

  39. [47]

    Cosmological model with variable light velocity: the interpretation of red shifts

    Petit JP. Cosmological model with variable light velocity: the interpretation of red shifts. Modern Physics Letters A 1988; 3(18): 1733-1744

    1988

  40. [48]

    Raum und Zeit

    Minkowski, H. Raum und Zeit. J Physikalische Zeitschrift. 1909; 10 :75–88

    1909

  41. [49]

    Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper

    Einstein A. Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper. Annalen der Physik (ser. 4), 1905 : 17, 891–921

    1905

  42. [50]

    The disconnection hypothesis

    Friston K, Brown HR, Siemerkus J, Stephan KE. The disconnection hypothesis. Schizophrenia Research 2016: 176: 83-94

    2016

  43. [51]

    Functional Connectivity and Brain Networks in Schizophrenia

    Lynall ME, Bassett DS, Kerwin D, McKenna PJ, Kitzbichler M, Muller U, Bullmore ED. Functional Connectivity and Brain Networks in Schizophrenia. Journal of Neuroscience 2010; 30 (28): 9477-9487

    2010

  44. [52]

    Widespread white matter microstructural differences in schizophrenia across 4322 individuals: results from the ENIGMA Schizophrenia DTI Working Group

    Kelly S et al. Widespread white matter microstructural differences in schizophrenia across 4322 individuals: results from the ENIGMA Schizophrenia DTI Working Group. Molecular Psychiatry 2018; 23: 1261-1269

    2018

  45. [53]

    The anatomical distance of functional connections predicts brain network topology in health and schizophrenia

    Alexander-Bloch AF, Vértes PE, Stidd R, Lalonde F, Clasen L, Rapoport J, Giedd J, Bullmore ET, Gogtay N. The anatomical distance of functional connections predicts brain network topology in health and schizophrenia. Cereb Cortex. 2013; 23(1):127- 38

    2013

  46. [54]

    Neuroimaging Auditory Hallucinations in Schizophrenia: From Neuroanatomy to Neurochemistry and Beyond

    Allen P, Modinos G, Hubl D, Schields G, Cachia A, Jardi R, Thomas P, Woodward T, Shotbolt P, Plaze M, Hoffman R. Neuroimaging Auditory Hallucinations in Schizophrenia: From Neuroanatomy to Neurochemistry and Beyond. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2012; 38(4) : 695-703

    2012

  47. [55]

    Théorie de la spéculation

    Bachelier L. Théorie de la spéculation. Annales Scientifiques de l’Ecole Normale Supérieure 1900; 3(17): 21-86

    1900

  48. [56]

    Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging

    Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology. 1988; 168(2):497-505

    1988

  49. [57]

    IVIM MRI: Principles and Applications

    Le Bihan D, Iima M., Federau C., Sigmund E.E Coeds. IVIM MRI: Principles and Applications. Pan Stanford Publishing, Singapore, 2019

    2019

  50. [58]

    On the evolution of random graphs

    Erdos R & Rényi A. On the evolution of random graphs. Pub. Math. Inset. Hug. Acad. Sci 5, 17-60, 1990

    1990

  51. [59]

    Collective dynamics of ‘small -world’ networks

    Watt DJ, Strogatz SH. Collective dynamics of ‘small -world’ networks. Nature 1998; 393, pages440–442 (1998)

    1998

  52. [60]

    Random geometric graphs, Phys

    Dall J, Christensen M. Random geometric graphs, Phys. Rev. E 2002: 66; 016121

    2002

  53. [61]

    Clique topology reveals intrinsic geometric structure in neural correlations

    Giusti C, Pastalkova E, Curto C and Itskov V. Clique topology reveals intrinsic geometric structure in neural correlations. PNAS 2015 : 112 (44) : 13455-13460

    2015

  54. [62]

    On Diffusion by Discontinuous Movements, and on the Telegraph Equation

    Goldstein S. On Diffusion by Discontinuous Movements, and on the Telegraph Equation. The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, Volume 4, Issue 2, 1951, Pages 129–156

    1951

  55. [63]

    Relativistic diffusions: A unifying approach

    Chevalier C, Debbasch F, J. Relativistic diffusions: A unifying approach. Journal of Mathematical Physics 2008; 49, 043303

    2008

  56. [64]

    Cosmology with matter diffusion

    Calogero S, Velten H. Cosmology with matter diffusion. JCAP 2013; 11: 025

    2013

  57. [65]

    Relativistic diffusion processes and random walk models

    Dunkel J., Talkner P, Hanggi P. Relativistic diffusion processes and random walk models. Physical Review D 2007; 75: 043001

    2007

  58. [66]

    Relativistic diffusion with friction on a pseudo-Riemannian manifold

    Haba Z. Relativistic diffusion with friction on a pseudo-Riemannian manifold. Classical and Quantum Gravity, IOP Publishing, 2010, 27 (9), pp.95021

    2010

  59. [67]

    Homological scaffolds of brain functional networks

    Petri G, Expert P, Turkheimer F, Carhart-Harris R, Nutt D, Hellyer PJ, Vaccarino F. Homological scaffolds of brain functional networks. J. R. Soc. Interface 2014; 11: 20140873

    2014

  60. [68]

    Human consciousness is supported by dynamic complex patterns of brain signal coordination

    Demertzi A, Tagliazucchi E, Dehaene S, Deco G, Barttfeld P, Raimondo F, Martial C, Fernadez-Espejo D, Rohaut B, Voss HU, Schiff ND, Owen AM, Laureys S, Naccache L, Sitt JD. Human consciousness is supported by dynamic complex patterns of brain signal coordination. Sciences Adva...

    2019

  61. [69]

    Signature of consciousness in the dynamics of resting-state brain activity

    Barttfeld P, Uhrig L, Sitt JD, Sigman M, Jarraya B, Dehaene S. Signature of consciousness in the dynamics of resting-state brain activity. PNAS 2015; 112(3): 887-892

    2015

  62. [70]

    Dynamic repertoire of intrinsic brain states is reduced in propofol-induced unconsciousness

    Hudetz AG, Liu X, Pillay S. Dynamic repertoire of intrinsic brain states is reduced in propofol-induced unconsciousness. Brain Connect. 2015 Feb;5(1):10-22

    2015

  63. [71]

    Efficient physical embedding of topologically complex information processing in btains and computer circuits

    Bassett DS, Greenfield DL, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Weinberger DR, Moore SW, Bullmore ET. Efficient physical embedding of topologically complex information processing in btains and computer circuits. Plos Comput Biol 2010; 6: e1000748

    2010

  64. [72]

    Ist die Trägheit eines Körpers von seinem Energieinhalt abhängig? Annalen der Physik (ser

    Einstein A (c). Ist die Trägheit eines Körpers von seinem Energieinhalt abhängig? Annalen der Physik (ser. 4), 1905 : 18, 639–641

    1905

  65. [73]

    Water diffusion closely reveals neural activity status in rat brain loci affected by anesthesia

    Abe Y, Tsurugizawa T, Le Bihan D. Water diffusion closely reveals neural activity status in rat brain loci affected by anesthesia. PLoS Biol. 2017 Apr 13; 15(4): e2001494

    2017

  66. [74]

    How do the brain’s time and space mediate consciousness and its different dimensions

    Northoff G, Hunag Z. How do the brain’s time and space mediate consciousness and its different dimensions. Temporo-spatial theory of consciousness (TTC). Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews 2017; 80: 630-645

    2017

  67. [75]

    Alex T. L. Leong, Xunda Wang, Celia M. Dong, Russell W. Chan, Ed X. Wu, ISMRM 2019, p.202

    2019

  68. [76]

    Cerebral Bases of Subliminal and Supraliminal Priming during Reading

    Kouider, S, Dehaene S, Jobert A, Le Bihan, D. Cerebral Bases of Subliminal and Supraliminal Priming during Reading. Cerebral cortex 2007; 17: 2019-2029

    2007

  69. [77]

    Thinking fast and slow

    Kahneman D. Thinking fast and slow. 2011, Farrat, Straus and Giroux, New York NY

    2011

  70. [78]

    Spontaneous local variatikons in ongoing neural activity bias perceptual decisions

    Hesselmann G, Kell CA, Eger E, Kleinschmidt A. Spontaneous local variatikons in ongoing neural activity bias perceptual decisions. PNAS 2008; 105(31): 10894-10989

    2008

  71. [79]

    Metastability, criticality and phase transitions in brain and its models, BioSystems 2007: 90:496-508

    Werner G. Metastability, criticality and phase transitions in brain and its models, BioSystems 2007: 90:496-508

    2007

  72. [80]

    A theory of cortical responses

    Friston K. A theory of cortical responses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 20015;360: 815-936

  73. [81]

    Ongoing dynamics in large-scale functional connectivity predict perception

    Sepideh Sadaghiani, Jean-Baptiste Poline, Andreas Kleinschmidt, and Mark D’Esposito. Ongoing dynamics in large-scale functional connectivity predict perception. PNAS July 7, 2015 112 (27) 8463-8468

    2015

  74. [82]

    Activations in Visual and Attention-Related Areas Predict and Correlate with the Degree of Perceptual Learning

    Mukai I, Kim D, Fukunaga M, Japee S, Marrett S and Ungerleider LG. Activations in Visual and Attention-Related Areas Predict and Correlate with the Degree of Perceptual Learning. Journal of Neuroscience 17 October 2007, 27 (42) 11401-11411

    2007

  75. [83]

    Perceptual learning induces changes in early and late visual evoked potentials

    Ahmadi M, McDevitt EA, Silver MA, Mednick SC. Perceptual learning induces changes in early and late visual evoked potentials. Vision Research 2018; 101-109

    2018

  76. [84]

    Psychiatry Res 1982 ; 7: 299-308

    Callaway E, Halliday R.The effect of attentional effort on visual evoked potential N1 latency. Psychiatry Res 1982 ; 7: 299-308

    1982

  77. [85]

    Detecting awareness in the vegetative state

    Owen AM, Coleman MR, Boly M, Davis MH, Laureys S, Pickard JD. Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Science 2006 Sep 8;313(5792):1402

    2006

  78. [86]

    Controllability of structural brain networks

    Gu S, Pasqualetti S, Cieslak M, Telesford QK, Yu AB, Kahn AE, Medaglia JD, Vettel JM, Miller MB, Grafton ST, Bassett DS. Controllability of structural brain networks. Nature Communications 2015 ; 6 : 8414

    2015

  79. [87]

    (2016) Stimulation-Based Control of Dynamic Brain Networks

    Muldoon SF, Pasqualetti F, Gu S, Cieslak M, Grafton ST, Vettel JM, et al. (2016) Stimulation-Based Control of Dynamic Brain Networks. PLoS Comput Biol 12(9): e1005076

    2016

  80. [88]

    Optimally controlling the human connectome: the role of network topology

    Betzel RF, Gu S, Medaglia, JD, Pasqualetti F, Bassett, DS. Optimally controlling the human connectome: the role of network topology. Scientific Reports 2016; 6: 30770

    2016

  81. [89]

    What Makes Eye Contact Special? Neural Substrates of On-Line Mutual Eye-Gaz: A Hyperscanninf fMRI study

    Koike T, Sumiya M, Nakagawa E, Okazaki S, Sadato N. What Makes Eye Contact Special? Neural Substrates of On-Line Mutual Eye-Gaz: A Hyperscanninf fMRI study. eNeuro 2019; ENEURO.0284-18.2019

    2019

  82. [90]

    Wolff J. et al. Differences in White Matter Fibert Tract Development Present From 6 to 24 Months in Infants With Autism. J. Psychiatry 2012; 169(6): 589-600

    2012

  83. [91]

    Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie, 1095 : Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Sitzungsberichte, 1917 (part 1), 142–152

    Einstein A. Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie, 1095 : Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Sitzungsberichte, 1917 (part 1), 142–152

    1917

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.