Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 56 references

Valley notch filter in a graphene strain superlattice: Green's function and machine learning approach

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Periodic Gaussian strain bumps turn a graphene nanoribbon into a valley notch filter that fully polarizes one valley.

desk verdict Physics of the valley notch filter is solid and novel; the DNN generalization claim is inflated by a random-row split, but that is fixable and the paper deserves refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.04604 v2 pith:F2MTNQUS submitted 2019-08-13 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.dis-nn

V. Torres , P. Silva , E. A. T. de Souza , L. A. Silva , D. A. Bahamon This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.dis-nn PACS 73.23.-b73.63.-b81.05.ue07.05.Mh
keywords valleytronicsgraphenenanoribbonstrainsuperlatticepseudo-magneticfieldvalleyfilterGreen'sfunctiondeepneuralnetworkmini-stopbands
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that arranging Gaussian out-of-plane bumps into a periodic chain turns a strained graphene ribbon into a much stronger valley filter than a single bump. The periodicity folds the ribbon's transverse-mode bands and couples modes travelling in opposite directions; at the Bragg energies of Eq. (6) this opens mini-stopbands that reject one valley, producing fully valley-polarized conductance plateaus over wider energy ranges and at lower strain than single-bubble devices. The paper also claims that the same physics is learnable: a deep neural network trained on Green's-function results predicts the valley polarization almost as accurately as the full calculation while costing far less computation, and a design search with the network identifies a six-bump, low-strain chain as an optimal valley filter. If these claims hold, valleytronic devices would not need perfect zigzag edges, high strain, or carefully tuned energies.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Bragg condition for counter-propagating transverse modes, Eq. (6): $$E^l_{mm} = (3 t_0 a_c/2)\sqrt{(l\pi/d)^2 + (\pi(m+1/2)/W_0)^2}.$$ It fixes the energies at which mode $m$ is reflected by the superlattice period $d$; the resulting anticrossings open mini-stopbands, and those stopbands are the notch filter. The transport calculation uses the lattice Green's function with wave-function matching to resolve transmission by valley, and the machine-learning component is a seven-hidden-layer feedforward network that maps seven design inputs to the valley polarization.

What would settle it

Train the same network on a split that keeps all 500 energy samples of each of the 117 device layouts together in either the training or the test set, and measure $R^2$ on the held-out layouts; a large drop from the reported 0.970 would show the network has not generalized to unseen superlattices. On the physics side, the stated mechanism would be contradicted if a band-structure calculation of the infinite Gaussian chain showed no mini-stopband anticrossing at the Bragg energies of Eq. (6).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

This paper's central claim is that a one-dimensional chain of out-of-plane Gaussian deformations in a zigzag graphene nanoribbon acts as a valley notch filter: the conductance develops quantized plateaus with full valley polarization in the $K'$ valley ($P_{K'}=1$) while the $K$ valley is blocked. The mechanism is the periodic folding of the transverse-mode spectrum combined with strain-induced pseudo-magnetic fields; counter-propagating modes in the same valley couple at the Bragg energies of Eq. (6), opening mini-stopbands that selectively reject one valley. The paper argues this is a genuine improvement over a single Gaussian bump, where valley imbalance comes only from the extra edge-state mode, requires fine-tuned energy, and demands high strain; the superlattice produces the filter from low-energy bulk modes, works at lower strain and over wider energy windows, and is robust to moderate disorder in bump height, width, and spacing. The paper further claims that a deep feedforward network trained on Green's-function data predicts $P_{K'}$ with reported $R^2=0.970$ and mean squared error $0.001$ on the test split, at much lower computational cost, and uses the network to propose a six-bump, $\alpha=15\%$ chain as the best low-strain compact valley filter in the scanned design space.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the network's reported test accuracy, measured on energy values drawn from the same device layouts that were used in training, also holds for device layouts it has never seen; if that generalization fails, the fast design-tool claim collapses even though the Green's-function physics may stand.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A periodic Gaussian chain fully valley-polarizes the conductance in quantized plateaus ($P_{K'}=1$), in contrast to a single bump's weak polarization confined to the edge-state mode.
  • The plateau energies are controlled by the Bragg condition of Eq. (6), so the filter's operating windows can be positioned by choosing the bump spacing $d$ and ribbon width $W_0$.
  • Higher-energy plateaus are carried by low-energy bulk transverse modes, making the filter less vulnerable to edge roughness than single-bubble devices.
  • The filter remains effective under roughly 10% disorder in bump height, width, and spacing; the reported valley-filter capability changes from 22.5% to between 20.7% and 22.7% for the tested disorder.
  • The trained DNN reproduces $P_{K'}$ with $R^2=0.970$ on the reported test split at much lower cost than the Green's-function solve, and the resulting design search identifies a compact $N_G=6$, $\alpha=15\%$ chain as optimal among the scanned parameters.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: Because the Bragg condition in Eq. (6) depends only on period, ribbon width, and transverse-mode index, not on the Gaussian profile, the same notch-filter mechanism should appear for other periodic out-of-plane profiles, such as sinusoidal ripples or folded geometries; a Green's-function calculation for those profiles would test that.
  • Inference: The reported tendency of the neural network to locate plateaus but underestimate their widths suggests the design-tool value would improve with a loss function that weights the plateau edges more heavily, or with a two-stage model that first classifies plateau regions and then regresses their widths.
  • Inference: The DNN result that a few bumps mimic an infinite chain implies the practical device could be short, and an experimental signature to look for is the emergence of quantized plateaus as the number of nanopillars is increased from one to about six.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies valley-polarized electron transport through a zigzag graphene nanoribbon containing a one-dimensional superlattice of out-of-plane Gaussian deformations. Using a lattice Green's function / wave-function-matching method, the authors show that periodicity produces fully valley-polarized conductance plateaus (PK' = 1) and attribute this to the coupling of counter-propagating transverse modes that opens mini-stopbands, with Bragg energies given by Eq. (6). They also train a deep neural network on data generated by the same Green's-function method to predict valley polarization as a function of six design parameters, report R2 = 0.970 on a test set, and use the DNN to search for an optimal superlattice, which they identify as NG = 6 and α = 15%. The DNN predictions are evaluated against the same Green's-function technique that generated the training data.

Significance. The Green's-function part of the paper is careful and the proposed mechanism—mini-stopbands opened by periodicity-induced mode coupling—is supported by the band-structure analysis and by the quantitative agreement between the Bragg energies of Eq. (6) and the positions of the valley-filter plateaus. The demonstration that a periodic array of Gaussian bumps yields valley filtering at lower strain and in wider energy windows than a single bump is a valuable result for the valleytronics literature. The DNN surrogate is an interesting and potentially useful tool, but the reported generalization metric is compromised by the data-splitting procedure. Because the design-tool claim in Section III B rests on generalization to unseen superlattice configurations, the machine-learning part of the paper requires re-validation. If a configuration-level holdout test confirms good accuracy, the paper will be a solid contribution; as it stands, the machine-learning claims are overstated.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III A] The reported test accuracy R2 = 0.970 is obtained by randomly splitting the 58,500 energy samples into 80% training and 20% testing. Because each of the 117 configurations contributes 500 energy points, this row-wise split places energies from the same superlattice geometry in both the training and test sets. The reported R2 therefore measures interpolation in energy for geometries already seen during training, not prediction for a new (Nx, Ny, NG, b, d, α) configuration. The design-tool claims in §III B require the latter. Please repeat the evaluation with a configuration-level split (for example, hold out whole configurations or use leave-one-configuration-out cross-validation) and report the resulting R2 and MSE. It would also be informative to state whether the selected optimum (NG = 6, α = 15%) was present in the training set under the original split.
  2. [§III B] The text contains a direct internal contradiction about the DNN's accuracy on plateau width. It states that "The DNN accurately predicts the energy location of the valley plate but fails to estimate its width" and, in the discussion of Fig. 9a, that DNN-predicted QK' values are "smaller than the true values calculated by the Green's functions." Yet the caption of Fig. 9b says the DNN predicts "all the energy position and width of the valley plateaus with acceptable accuracy." Since QK' is a width-based figure of merit (Eq. (7)), a systematic underestimation of plateau width means the design-search result is not protected by the high R2. Please quantify the DNN error in QK' on configurations not used in training and reconcile the two statements.
  3. [§III B] The design-search paragraph does not specify the objective used to trade off QK', α, and NG. The claim that NG = 6 and α = 15% is "optimal" depends on an unstated ranking criterion. Please define the criterion (for example, a scalarized objective or a Pareto-front definition) so that the search is reproducible and the result is interpretable.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract / Title] The term "valley notch filter" is used throughout, but the described effect is a fully valley-polarized passband (a plateau where PK' = 1), not a narrow notch of rejection. Please clarify the terminology or justify the use of "notch filter" in the abstract and introduction.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase "a sequence by valley filter plateaus" is ungrammatical; it should read "a sequence of valley filter plateaus." Similar grammar issues appear elsewhere (for example, "the firsts valley filter plateaus" in §II B).
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption of Fig. 2 lists transmission probabilities for panels (d) and (e), but the body text refers to Fig. 2(e)-(f) for the same quantities. Please make the panel references consistent.
  4. [Table II] The dataset summary includes configurations with NG = 0, b = 0, d = 0, and α = 0. The physical meaning of these boundary cases (presumably pristine ribbons) should be stated explicitly, as they may affect the DNN training and the reported statistics.
  5. [§III A] The phrase "hyperparameter tunning" should be "hyperparameter tuning".
  6. [Various] The word "supperlattice" is misspelled as "superlattice" in several places, including §II B and the caption of Fig. 5.
  7. [§IV] The computational-complexity statement "inverting a matrix is O(Ny^γ) where 2.3 ≤ γ ≤ 3" is vague; please specify which matrix is inverted and which algorithm the bound refers to.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the Green's-function valley-filter result is self-contained, and the DNN is an explicit empirical surrogate; the row-wise train/test split is a generalization risk, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's first-principles claim—that periodicity of Gaussian bumps produces a valley notch filter via coupling of counter-propagating modes—is built from a standard tight-binding Hamiltonian, Landauer-Büttiker mode matching, band-structure calculations, and the independent Bragg condition E^l_mm = ... . The plateau positions are compared with computed band anticrossings; nothing is fitted in a way that forces the agreement. The ML section trains a DNN on Green's-function outputs; this is supervised surrogate modeling, not a derivation, and the paper explicitly reports that the DNN underestimates Q_K' and fails to reproduce oscillations for PK' < 0.8. The main caveat is that the 58,500 rows come from 117 configurations and the random row-wise 80/20 split allows the same geometry to appear in both training and test sets, so R2 = 0.970 likely measures energy interpolation within seen configurations rather than generalization to new superlattices. That is a validation and overclaim concern, which should be recorded as a correctness risk rather than circularity. Self-citations (refs. 9-10) appear as contextual examples and are not load-bearing for the paper's central derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's physics relies on the standard tight-binding strain model and a mode-matching transport formalism; these are domain assumptions, not new entities. The free parameters are the ad hoc Q_K' threshold, the hand-selected DNN hyperparameters, and the disorder amplitudes chosen for the robustness test. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Valley filter capability threshold = P_K' > 0.98; E_T = 0.2 t0
    The definition of Q_K' in Eq. (7) uses an arbitrary polarization threshold and energy window; changing these changes the reported capability percentages and the DNN-based optimization outcome.
  • DNN architecture hyperparameters = 7 hidden layers, 175 neurons per layer, 385 epochs
    The network depth, width, and early-stopping epoch were selected by trial and error using training error as the criterion; the reported predictions depend on these choices.
  • Disorder perturbation amplitudes = Delta A = 0.1 A0, Delta b = 0.091 b0, Delta d = 0.067 d0
    Chosen to avoid overlapping deformations and to keep deformations narrower than the ribbon; the disorder-robustness claim depends on these specific amplitudes.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Nearest-neighbor tight-binding with modified hopping tij = t0 exp[-beta(lij/ac - 1)] captures the electronic effect of out-of-plane strain.
    The paper uses beta = 3 and maps strain to a pseudo-magnetic gauge field (Eq. 3), neglecting scalar potentials, curvature-induced effects, and lattice relaxation. This is standard in the field but remains an unvalidated modeling assumption.
  • domain assumption Wave function matching and Green's function formalism (Eq. 4) correctly decomposes transport into valley-conserved transmission channels, with no intervalley scattering in the leads.
    Valley polarization in Eq. (5) is defined from transmissions of incoming modes in K or K' to outgoing modes in the same valley; intervalley scattering is not included. This is appropriate for smooth deformations but is an assumption.
  • ad hoc to paper The deep neural network can represent valley polarization as a smooth function of the six input parameters with the chosen architecture.
    The architecture and universal-approximation assumption were chosen empirically; the paper provides no proof that the selected function class covers the true dependence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Valley notch filter in a graphene strain superlattice: Green's function and machine learning approach." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/F2MTNQUS

@misc{pith2026190804604,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Valley notch filter in a graphene strain superlattice: Green's function and machine learning approach},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/F2MTNQUS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.04604}
}
read the original abstract

The valley transport properties of a superlattice of out-of-plane Gaussians deformations are calculated using a Green's function and a Machine Learning approach. Our results show that periodicity significantly improves the valley filter capabilities of a single Gaussian deformation, these manifest themselves in the conductance as a sequence by valley filter plateaus. We establish that the physical effect behind the observed valley notch filter is the coupling between counter-propagating transverse modes; the complex relationship between the design parameters of the superlattice and the valley filter effect make difficult to estimate in advance the valley filter potentialities of a given superlattice. With this in mind, we show that a Deep Neural Network can be trained to predict valley polarization with a precision similar to the Green's function but with much less computational effort.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.04604 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (a) Schematic representation of the two-terminal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Band structure for a zigzag graphene nanoribbon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: (a) Conductance for a zigzag graphene nanoribbon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Average Valley polarization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Feedforward fully connected deep neural network ar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Variation of the MSE versus number of epochs for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Predicted valley polarization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author J. R. \ Schaibley , author H. Yu , author G. Clark , author P. Rivera , author J. S. \ Ross , author K. L. \ Seyler , author W. Yao ,\ and\ author X. Xu ,\ title title Valleytronics in 2 D materials ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Reviews Materials \ volume 1 ,\ pages 16055 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    author author L. J. \ Sham , author S. J. \ Allen , author A. Kamgar ,\ and\ author D. C. \ Tsui ,\ title title Valley-valley splitting in inversion layers on a high-index surface of silicon ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.472 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 40 ,\ pages 472 ( year 1978 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.40.472

  3. [3]

    author author S. E. \ Thompson , author M. Armstrong , author C. Auth , author M. Alavi , author M. Buehler , author R. Chau , author S. Cea , author T. Ghani , author G. Glass , author T. Hoffman , author C. H. \ Jan , author C. Kenyon , author J. Klaus , author K. Kuhn , author Z. Ma , et al. ,\ title title A 90-nm logic technology featuring strained-si...

    arXiv

  4. [4]

    Gunawan , author B

    author author O. Gunawan , author B. Habib , author E. P. \ De Poortere ,\ and\ author M. Shayegan ,\ title title Quantized conductance in an A l A s two-dimensional electron system quantum point contact ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.155436 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 74 ,\ pages 155436 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.155436

  5. [5]

    Yao , author D

    author author W. Yao , author D. Xiao ,\ and\ author Q. Niu ,\ title title Valley-dependent optoelectronics from inversion symmetry breaking ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.235406 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 77 ,\ pages 235406 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.235406

  6. [6]

    Cao , author G

    author author T. Cao , author G. Wang , author W. Han , author H. Ye , author C. Zhu , author J. Shi , author Q. Niu , author P. Tan , author E. Wang , author B. Liu ,\ and\ author J. Feng ,\ title title Valley-selective circular dichroism of monolayer molybdenum disulphide ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 3 ,\ pages 887 ( year 2012...

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Li , author J

    author author Y. Li , author J. Ludwig , author T. Low , author A. Chernikov , author X. Cui , author G. Arefe , author Y. D. \ Kim , author A. M. \ van der Zande , author A. Rigosi , author H. M. \ Hill , author S. H. \ Kim , author J. Hone , author Z. Li , author D. Smirnov ,\ and\ author T. F. \ Heinz ,\ title title Valley splitting and polarization by...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.266804

  8. [8]

    MacNeill , author C

    author author D. MacNeill , author C. Heikes , author K. F. \ Mak , author Z. Anderson , author A. Korm\'anyos , author V. Z\'olyomi , author J. Park ,\ and\ author D. C. \ Ralph ,\ title title Breaking of valley degeneracy by magnetic field in monolayer M o S e_ 2 ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.037401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume...

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.037401

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Qi , author D

    author author Z. Qi , author D. A. \ Bahamon , author V. M. \ Pereira , author H. S. \ Park , author D. K. \ Campbell ,\ and\ author A. H. C. \ Neto ,\ title title Resonant tunneling in graphene pseudomagnetic quantum dots ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/nl400872q journal journal N...

    doi

  2. [10]

    author author G. W. \ Jones , author D. A. \ Bahamon , author A. H. \ Castro Neto ,\ and\ author V. M. \ Pereira ,\ title title Quantized transport, strain-induced perfectly conducting modes, and valley filtering on shape-optimized graphene corbino devices ,\ https://doi.org/1...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Carrillo-Bastos , author C

    author author R. Carrillo-Bastos , author C. Le \'o n , author D. Faria , author A. Latg \'e , author E. Y. \ Andrei ,\ and\ author N. Sandler ,\ title title Strained fold-assisted transport in graphene systems ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 94 ,\ pages 125422 ...

    2016

  4. [12]

    author author D. R. \ da Costa , author A. Chaves , author G. A. \ Farias ,\ and\ author F. M. \ Peeters ,\ title title Valley filtering in graphene due to substrate-induced mass potential ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648x/aa6b24 journal journal Journal of Physics: Condense...

    doi

  5. [13]

    author author R. V. \ Gorbachev , author J. C. W. \ Song , author G. L. \ Yu , author A. V. \ Kretinin , author F. Withers , author Y. Cao , author A. Mishchenko , author I. V. \ Grigorieva , author K. S. \ Novoselov , author L. S. \ Levitov ,\ and\ author A. K. \ Geim ,\ titl...

    doi

  6. [14]

    Lee , author K

    author author J. Lee , author K. F. \ Mak ,\ and\ author J. Shan ,\ title title Electrical control of the valley hall effect in bilayer M o S _ 2 transistors ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Nanotechnology \ volume 11 ,\ pages 421 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  7. [15]

    Levy , author S

    author author N. Levy , author S. A. \ Burke , author K. L. \ Meaker , author M. Panlasigui , author A. Zettl , author F. Guinea , author A. H. C. \ Neto ,\ and\ author M. F. \ Crommie ,\ title title Strain-induced pseudo magnetic fields greater than 300 tesla in graphene nano...

    doi

  8. [16]

    Settnes , author S

    author author M. Settnes , author S. R. \ Power , author M. Brandbyge ,\ and\ author A.-P. \ Jauho ,\ title title Graphene nanobubbles as valley filters and beam splitters ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.276801 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 117 ,\ pages ...

    doi

  9. [17]

    Carrillo-Bastos , author M

    author author R. Carrillo-Bastos , author M. Ochoa , author S. A. \ Zavala ,\ and\ author F. Mireles ,\ title title Enhanced asymmetric valley scattering by scalar fields in nonuniform out-of-plane deformations in graphene ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 98 ,\ p...

    2018

  10. [18]

    Stegmann \ and\ author N

    author author T. Stegmann \ and\ author N. Szpak ,\ title title Current splitting and valley polarization in elastically deformed graphene ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/aaea8d journal journal 2D Materials \ volume 6 ,\ pages 015024 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi

  11. [19]

    author author S. P. \ Milovanovi \'c \ and\ author F. M. \ Peeters ,\ title title Strained graphene structures: From valleytronics to pressure sensing ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Nanostructured Materials for the Detection of CBRN ,\ editor edited by\ editor J. Bon c a \ and\ editor...

    2018

  12. [20]

    Myoung , author H

    author author N. Myoung , author H. Choi ,\ and\ author H. C. \ Park ,\ title title Manipulation of valley isospins in strained graphene for valleytronics ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.09079 \ ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    1907 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Milovanovi \'c \ and\ author F

    author author S. Milovanovi \'c \ and\ author F. Peeters ,\ title title Strain controlled valley filtering in multi-terminal graphene structures ,\ @noop journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 109 ,\ pages 203108 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  14. [22]

    author author S. P. \ Milovanovi \' c \ and\ author F. M. \ Peeters ,\ title title Strained graphene hall bar ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648x/aa50d3 journal journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter \ volume 29 ,\ pages 075601 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi

  15. [23]

    Zhai \ and\ author N

    author author D. Zhai \ and\ author N. Sandler ,\ title title Local versus extended deformed graphene geometries for valley filtering ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.165437 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 98 ,\ pages 165437 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi

  16. [24]

    \ Park , author L

    author author C.-H. \ Park , author L. Yang , author Y.-W. \ Son , author M. L. \ Cohen ,\ and\ author S. G. \ Louie ,\ title title Anisotropic behaviours of massless dirac fermions in graphene under periodic potentials ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 4 ,\ pag...

    2008

  17. [25]

    Brey \ and\ author H

    author author L. Brey \ and\ author H. A. \ Fertig ,\ title title Emerging zero modes for graphene in a periodic potential ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.046809 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 103 ,\ pages 046809 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    doi

  18. [26]

    \ Wang \ and\ author S.-Y

    author author L.-G. \ Wang \ and\ author S.-Y. \ Zhu ,\ title title Electronic band gaps and transport properties in graphene superlattices with one-dimensional periodic potentials of square barriers ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 81 ,\ pages 205444 ( year 2010...

    2010

  19. [27]

    Andrade , author R

    author author E. Andrade , author R. Carrillo-Bastos ,\ and\ author G. G. \ Naumis ,\ title title Valley engineering by strain in K ekul \'e -distorted graphene ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 99 ,\ pages 035411 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  20. [28]

    Benisty ,\ title title Graphene nanoribbons: Photonic crystal waveguide analogy and minigap stripes ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.155409 journal journal Phys

    author author H. Benisty ,\ title title Graphene nanoribbons: Photonic crystal waveguide analogy and minigap stripes ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.155409 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 79 ,\ pages 155409 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    doi

  21. [29]

    Jiang , author J

    author author Y. Jiang , author J. Mao , author J. Duan , author X. Lai , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi ,\ and\ author E. Y. \ Andrei ,\ title title Visualizing strain-induced pseudomagnetic fields in graphene through an h BN magnifying glass ,\ https://doi.org/10.1...

    doi

  22. [30]

    author author S. T. \ Gill , author J. H. \ Hinnefeld , author S. Zhu , author W. J. \ Swanson , author T. Li ,\ and\ author N. Mason ,\ title title Mechanical control of graphene on engineered pyramidal strain arrays ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b00335 journal journal ...

    doi

  23. [31]

    author author J. H. \ Hinnefeld , author S. T. \ Gill ,\ and\ author N. Mason ,\ title title Graphene transport mediated by micropatterned substrates ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5027577 journal journal Appl. Phys. Lett. \ volume 112 ,\ pages 173504 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi

  24. [32]

    Banerjee , author V.-H

    author author R. Banerjee , author V.-H. \ Nguyen , author T. Granzier-Nakajima , author L. Pabbi , author A. Lherbier , author A. Binion , author J.-C. \ Charlier , author M. Terrones ,\ and\ author E. Hudson ,\ title title Strain modulated superlattices in graphene ,\ @noop ...

    1903 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Zdeborov \'a ,\ title title New tool in the box ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 13 ,\ pages 420 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    author author L. Zdeborov \'a ,\ title title New tool in the box ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 13 ,\ pages 420 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  26. [34]

    Seko , author A

    author author A. Seko , author A. Togo , author H. Hayashi , author K. Tsuda , author L. Chaput ,\ and\ author I. Tanaka ,\ title title Prediction of low-thermal-conductivity compounds with first-principles anharmonic lattice-dynamics calculations and bayesian optimization ,\ ...

    doi

  27. [35]

    author author P. Z. \ Hanakata , author E. D. \ Cubuk , author D. K. \ Campbell ,\ and\ author H. S. \ Park ,\ title title Accelerated search and design of stretchable graphene kirigami using machine learning ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.255304 journal journal Ph...

    doi

  28. [36]

    author author E. D. \ Cubuk , author R. J. S. \ Ivancic , author S. S. \ Schoenholz , author D. J. \ Strickland , author A. Basu , author Z. S. \ Davidson , author J. Fontaine , author J. L. \ Hor , author Y. R. \ Huang , author Y. Jiang , author N. C. \ Keim , author K. D. \ ...

    doi

  29. [37]

    Carvalho , author N

    author author D. Carvalho , author N. A. \ Garc\' a-Mart\' nez , author J. L. \ Lado ,\ and\ author J. Fern\'andez-Rossier ,\ title title Real-space mapping of topological invariants using artificial neural networks ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.115453 journal journal...

    doi

  30. [38]

    author author M. A. \ Vozmediano , author M. Katsnelson ,\ and\ author F. Guinea ,\ title title Gauge fields in graphene ,\ @noop journal journal Physics Reports \ volume 496 ,\ pages 109 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010

  31. [39]

    Ando ,\ title title Quantum point contacts in magnetic fields ,\ @noop journal journal Phys

    author author T. Ando ,\ title title Quantum point contacts in magnetic fields ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 44 ,\ pages 8017 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    1991

  32. [40]

    Khomyakov , author G

    author author P. Khomyakov , author G. Brocks , author V. Karpan , author M. Zwierzycki ,\ and\ author P. J. \ Kelly ,\ title title Conductance calculations for quantum wires and interfaces: Mode matching and G reen's functions ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 72...

    2005

  33. [41]

    Carrillo-Bastos , author D

    author author R. Carrillo-Bastos , author D. Faria , author A. Latg \'e , author F. Mireles ,\ and\ author N. Sandler ,\ title title Gaussian deformations in graphene ribbons: Flowers and confinement ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 90 ,\ pages 041411 ( year 2014...

    2014

  34. [42]

    Chaves , author L

    author author A. Chaves , author L. Covaci , author K. Y. \ Rakhimov , author G. A. \ Farias ,\ and\ author F. M. \ Peeters ,\ title title Wave-packet dynamics and valley filter in strained graphene ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.205430 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ v...

    doi

  35. [43]

    Leng \ and\ author C

    author author M. Leng \ and\ author C. S. \ Lent ,\ title title Recovery of quantized ballistic conductance in a periodically modulated channel ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.137 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 71 ,\ pages 137 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    doi

  36. [44]

    Haykin ,\ @noop title Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation \ ( publisher Prentice Hall ,\ year 1994 ) NoStop

    author author S. Haykin ,\ @noop title Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation \ ( publisher Prentice Hall ,\ year 1994 ) NoStop

    1994

  37. [45]

    author author C. C. \ Aggarwal ,\ @noop title Neural networks and deep learning \ ( publisher Springer ,\ year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  38. [46]

    author author I. A. \ Basheer \ and\ author M. Hajmeer ,\ title title Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of microbiological methods \ volume 43 ,\ pages 3 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    2000

  39. [47]

    Swingler ,\ @noop title Applying neural networks: a practical guide \ ( publisher Morgan Kaufmann ,\ year 1996 ) NoStop

    author author K. Swingler ,\ @noop title Applying neural networks: a practical guide \ ( publisher Morgan Kaufmann ,\ year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996

  40. [48]

    Boger \ and\ author H

    author author Z. Boger \ and\ author H. Guterman ,\ title title Knowledge extraction from artificial neural network models ,\ in\ https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.1997.633051 booktitle 1997 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Computational Cybernetics ...

    1997

  41. [49]

    author author M. J. \ Berry \ and\ author G. S. \ Linoff ,\ @noop title Data mining techniques: for marketing, sales, and customer relationship management \ ( publisher John Wiley & Sons ,\ year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004

  42. [50]

    Abadi , author P

    author author M. Abadi , author P. Barham , author J. Chen , author Z. Chen , author A. Davis , author J. Dean , author M. Devin , author S. Ghemawat , author G. Irving , author M. Isard , author M. Kudlur , author J. Levenberg , author R. Monga , author S. Moore , author D. G...

    2016

  43. [51]

    author author H. H. \ Thodberg ,\ title title A review of bayesian neural networks with an application to near infrared spectroscopy ,\ https://doi.org/10.1109/72.478392 journal journal IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks \ volume 7 ,\ pages 56 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    doi

  44. [52]

    Zhang , author Y

    author author Y. Zhang , author Y. Kim , author M. J. \ Gilbert ,\ and\ author N. Mason ,\ title title Electronic transport in a two-dimensional superlattice engineered via self-assembled nanostructures ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41699-018-0076-0 journal journal npj 2D Materi...

    doi

  45. [53]

    Xu , author A

    author author T. Xu , author A. D \' az \'A lvarez , author W. Wei , author D. Eschimese , author S. Eliet , author O. Lancry , author E. Galopin , author F. Vaurette , author M. Berthe , author D. Desremes , author B. Wei , author J. Xu , author J. F. \ Lampin , author E. Pal...

    doi

  46. [54]

    Neek-Amal , author L

    author author M. Neek-Amal , author L. Covaci ,\ and\ author F. M. \ Peeters ,\ title title Nanoengineered nonuniform strain in graphene using nanopillars ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.041405 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 86 ,\ pages 041405 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi

  47. [55]

    Nemes-Incze , author G

    author author P. Nemes-Incze , author G. Kukucska , author J. Koltai , author J. K \"u rti , author C. Hwang , author L. Tapaszt \'o ,\ and\ author L. Bir \'o ,\ title title Preparing local strain patterns in graphene by atomic force microscope based indentation ,\ https://doi...

    doi

  48. [56]

    Jia , author W

    author author P. Jia , author W. Chen , author J. Qiao , author M. Zhang , author X. Zheng , author Z. Xue , author R. Liang , author C. Tian , author L. He , author Z. Di ,\ and\ author X. Wang ,\ title title Programmable graphene nanobubbles with three-fold symmetric pseudo-...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.