Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 15 references

Properties of the Interstellar Medium along Sight Lines to Nearby Planet Hosting Stars

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that three nearby planet-hosting stars show no astrospheric hydrogen-wall absorption, so their stellar wind mass-loss rates cannot be measured with the astrosphere technique.

desk verdict Solid new LISM data and a useful catalog, but the abstract oversells both the cloud assignments and the ionized-gas inference. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.05375 v1 pith:5B4TAFXF submitted 2019-08-15 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.EPastro-ph.GA

Eric Edelman , Seth Redfield , Jeffrey L. Linsky , Brian E. Wood , Hans Müller This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.EPastro-ph.GA
keywords localinterstellarmediumastrosphereshydrogenwallLyman-alphastellarwindmasslossexoplanethoststarscloudsHST/STISspectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to characterize the interstellar medium toward three nearby exoplanet-hosting stars and to search for astrospheres, the stellar analogues of the Sun's heliosphere. It finds three distinct interstellar absorption components toward each star, reliably matches eight of the nine components to known local clouds, and finds no blue-shifted Lyman-alpha absorption of the kind a hydrogen wall would produce. The authors conclude that these stars are likely embedded in ionized interstellar gas, so the astrosphere technique cannot measure their stellar winds. The practical payoff is a table of predicted interstellar velocities and hydrogen column densities for all known exoplanet hosts within 20 parsecs, useful for planning and interpreting ultraviolet observations of these systems.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the hydrogen wall, a region of decelerated and heated neutral hydrogen created by charge exchange between the stellar wind and interstellar neutrals; it imprints broad Lyman-alpha absorption blueshifted relative to the surrounding gas as seen from outside the star. The analysis machinery is multi-component Voigt-profile fitting of Mg II, Fe II, D I, and H I absorption, with D I providing a hydrogen column estimate through the fixed local D/H ratio, and the intrinsic stellar Lyman-alpha core reconstructed by assuming it resembles the self-reversed Mg II line shape. The no-astrosphere conclusion follows from examining residuals after subtracting the interstellar-only model, supplemented by H I versus D I velocity comparisons and by hydrodynamic model predictions for where hydrogen-wall absorption would appear.

What would settle it

A higher signal-to-noise Lyman-alpha spectrum of any one of these stars, analyzed with an independently reconstructed stellar line shape, that shows a residual blueshifted absorption feature at the hydrogen-wall velocity (around -90 km/s for HD 192310 and -50 km/s for HD 9826) would overturn the no-astrosphere conclusion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Lyman-alpha line profiles of HD 192310, HD 9826, and HD 206860 are fully explained by the reconstructed stellar emission line plus interstellar H I and D I absorption in three velocity components; no additional blueshifted absorption from a stellar hydrogen wall is present. Consequently, none of these planet hosts has a detectable astrosphere, and their stellar wind mass-loss rates cannot be measured by the astrosphere technique. The authors infer that the stars are likely surrounded by fully ionized interstellar gas rather than embedded in the partially neutral clouds detected along their sight lines.

Load-bearing premise

The whole search for astrospheres relies on the assumption that the unseen core of each star's Lyman-alpha emission line has the same self-reversed shape as its Mg II lines; if the true core differs, the interstellar-only fit could hide a real blue-shifted hydrogen-wall feature.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the paper's conclusion is right, these three host stars' winds are invisible to the only observationally based technique that currently measures mass-loss rates for solar-like stars.
  • The likely ionized surroundings imply that the astrospheres of these stars, if present at all, are structured differently from the Sun's, so wind ram pressure cannot be inferred from hydrogen-wall absorption.
  • The measured LISM component velocities for these three systems anchor the removal of interstellar contamination in any future Lyman-alpha transit observations of their planets.
  • The catalogue of all known exoplanet hosts within 20 parsecs gives predicted cloud velocities and H I columns, allowing observers to identify sight lines where interstellar absorption is well separated from planet-induced features.
  • For stars with no measured interstellar properties, the predicted dominant clouds and their velocities indicate how blended the interstellar absorption is likely to be in low-resolution spectra.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The non-detections should not be read as weak winds; a stellar wind can exist without producing detectable hydrogen-wall absorption when the surrounding medium is ionized.
  • HD 192310's measured H I minus D I velocity offset of about +3 km/s leans toward heliospheric absorption, so a dedicated observation of that sight line could test whether the Sun's own hydrogen wall contaminates the profile.
  • The catalogue's predicted velocities could guide a targeted survey: choose transit-hosting stars within 20 parsecs whose predicted LISM velocities are cleanly separated from planet-induced absorption, maximizing the chance of detecting exoplanet atmospheric features.
  • If future higher signal-to-noise spectra reveal a weak residual blueshifted feature in any of these stars, the conclusion would shift from no astrosphere to a weak astrosphere, immediately providing a mass-loss estimate for a planet host.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents HST/STIS ultraviolet spectra of three nearby exoplanet host stars (HD 192310, HD 9826, HD 206860) and analyzes interstellar absorption in Lyman-alpha, Mg II, Fe II, and D I. The authors identify three interstellar velocity components per sight line, match most of them to clouds in the Redfield & Linsky (2008) 15-cloud model, measure temperatures, turbulence, and depletions, and search for astrospheric Lyman-alpha absorption. They report no blue-shifted absorption indicative of an astrosphere and conclude that the stars are probably embedded in fully ionized interstellar gas. They also compile a table of measured and predicted LISM properties for all known exoplanet host stars within 20 pc.

Significance. If the non-detection holds, the paper rules out detectable hydrogen walls for these three planet hosts, implying that the astrosphere technique cannot be used to measure their mass-loss rates and supporting the picture that many nearby stars lie in ionized Local Bubble gas. The fitting methodology is standard, the component selection uses F-tests, and the non-detection is directly supported by the displayed residuals. The compiled table of 96 exoplanet host systems within 20 pc is a useful community resource, and the predicted velocities are explicitly labeled as model-dependent. The main weakness is that the strongest physical conclusion rests on the reconstructed stellar Lyman-alpha profile rather than on an unambiguous spectral feature.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Section 3; Section 6] The abstract and conclusions claim that 'eight of the nine components' are reliably assigned to Redfield & Linsky (2008) clouds, but Section 3 states that component 1 toward HD 206860 has two plausible identifications (Vel or Mic, both outside their known boundaries) and that component 1 toward HD 9826 has no known cloud match. These two statements together leave only seven unambiguous matches, or eight only if the ambiguous HD 206860 component is counted as a match. The text is internally inconsistent and should be corrected in the abstract, Section 3, and Section 6.
  2. [Section 2.3; Section 5] The claim that 'None of the stars show blue-shifted absorption indicative of an astrosphere' rests on the assumption that the intrinsic stellar Lyman-alpha core is similar to the Mg II lines including a self-reversal. The blue wing, where astrospheric absorption would appear, is reconstructed by subtracting interstellar absorption from this assumed intrinsic profile; a broader or more asymmetric true core could absorb a broad, shallow astrospheric feature into the reconstruction rather than leave a residual. The paper's own delta-v(HI-DI) test shows HD 192310 at +2.93 km/s, which the authors interpret as possible heliospheric absorption, demonstrating that an additional absorption component can shift the HI centroid at the ~3 km/s level. The result should therefore be phrased as a non-detection at the model-dependent sensitivity of the reconstruction, not as proof that no hydrogen wall exists; the abstract's wording 'implying that the stars are in regions of ionized interstellar gas' is too strong.
  3. [Section 5; Figures 10 and 11; Table 5] The statement that 'If hydrogen walls are present, they should have been detected' depends on the assumed stellar mass-loss rates of 5.9 and 5.1 Mdot_sun, taken from an X-ray luminosity correlation. Figures 10 and 11 therefore demonstrate only that walls at those assumed mass-loss rates would be detectable, not that all plausible hydrogen walls are excluded. The paper should specify a detection threshold in terms of astrospheric column density or mass-loss rate, or otherwise state the sensitivity of the search in units that do not rely on the assumed wind strengths.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 1 caption] The caption mentions 'the ⊕ symbol' but does not define it; please spell out the symbol and its meaning explicitly.
  2. [Table 6] Several entries in Table 6 contain apparent formatting errors or missing separators (e.g., '0.1 3', '(35 .42)', '(16.73)'), and the distinction between measured and predicted values is sometimes unclear despite the parenthetical convention; please clean the table and mark measured and predicted entries consistently.
  3. [Section 2.2] The F-test used to justify the number of absorption components is mentioned but no significance threshold or procedural detail is given; please provide the threshold or a reference describing the test.
  4. [References] The reference entry for Wood et al. 2001 contains a duplicated year ('2001. 2001, ApJL, 547, L49') and should be corrected.
  5. [Section 4] The sentence 'The first component is likely the strongest absorber' is ambiguous; please clarify whether 'first' refers to the first-listed cloud, the component with the highest column density, or the LIC.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the astrosphere non-detection and LISM measurements rest on new STIS data; the only self-citations are minor and non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The central results do not reduce to their inputs by construction. The three interstellar velocity components per sight line are obtained from independent Voigt-profile fits to newly obtained STIS Mg II and Fe II spectra (Table 2), and the Lyman-alpha H I and D I fits (Table 3) are compared against the observed profiles rather than being forced by the Redfield & Linsky cloud model. The astrospheric search in Section 5 is a residual analysis with an explicit sensitivity test: the authors inject astrosphere models with assumed mass-loss rates and show that these would produce large residuals (Figures 10 and 11), so the non-detection is falsifiable rather than an identity. The assumption that the Lyman-alpha core is similar to Mg II including self-reversal is stated openly in Section 2.3 as an assumption; it limits the sensitivity of the search but does not constitute a hidden circular derivation. The self-citations to Redfield & Linsky (2000, 2008) are used for cloud identifications (Table 4) and for the predicted values in Table 6. Those table entries are explicitly labeled as predicted, and the cloud identification step is not used to prove the astrospheric non-detection. The paper also acknowledges that the HD 192310 velocity difference near 3 km/s may indicate heliospheric absorption, which is a stated caveat rather than a circular step. Overall, this is a minor self-citation case rather than a derivational circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central non-detection and column density measurements rest mainly on the intrinsic Lyman-alpha shape assumption, the D/H ratio, and the astrosphere model. The cloud assignments and Table 6 predictions rest on the R&L model. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • Intrinsic Lyman-alpha emission line shape adjustments = not tabulated, varied to optimize fit
    Section 2.3 allows 'small changes in the intrinsic emission line shape' when fitting the observed Lyman-alpha profile; these degrees of freedom can absorb or create residual features and are not independently constrained.
  • Assumed stellar mass-loss rates for astrosphere models = 5.9 Mdot (HD 192310), 5.1 Mdot (HD 9826)
    Taken from the Wood et al. (2005b/2014b) X-ray luminosity correlation used in Table 5 and Figures 10-11; the claim that a hydrogen wall should have been detected if present depends on these assumed rates.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Redfield & Linsky (2008) 15-cloud model correctly describes the local cloud velocity field and boundaries.
    Used in Section 3 to assign eight of nine velocity components and to compute predicted velocities in Table 6; if the model is incomplete, the component assignments and catalog predictions are less reliable.
  • ad hoc to paper The intrinsic Lyman-alpha line core has a shape similar to the Mg II lines, including self-reversal.
    Stated in Section 2.3; this is a paper-specific assumption required to reconstruct the stellar Lyman-alpha profile before searching for astrospheric absorption.
  • domain assumption The D/H ratio in the LISM is 1.56e-5 (Linsky et al. 2006).
    Used in Section 2.3 to estimate N(H I) from D I and to set the intrinsic Lyman-alpha wings; a different local D/H would shift the derived H I column densities.
  • domain assumption The astrosphere/hydrogen-wall model correctly predicts detectable Lyman-alpha absorption for the assumed wind parameters.
    Section 5 uses multi-fluid hydrodynamic models of Zank et al. and Muller et al. to predict expected absorption; the conclusion that non-detection implies ionized surroundings rests on this model being physically correct.
  • domain assumption Metals in the LISM are fully in their first ionization state when computing depletions.
    Section 3 says 'assuming that they are completely in their first ionization state, which is a reasonable assumption (Slavin & Frisch 2008)'; affects the depletion values in Table 4.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Properties of the Interstellar Medium along Sight Lines to Nearby Planet Hosting Stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5B4TAFXF

@misc{pith2026190805375,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Properties of the Interstellar Medium along Sight Lines to Nearby Planet Hosting Stars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5B4TAFXF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.05375}
}
read the original abstract

We analyze high-resolution ultraviolet spectra of three nearby exoplanet host stars (HD 192310, HD 9826, and HD 206860) to study interstellar properties along their lines of sight and to search for the presence of astrospheric absorption. Using HST/STIS spectra of the Lyman-alpha, Mg II, and Fe II lines, we identify three interstellar velocity components in the lines of sight to each star. We can reliably assign eight of the nine components to partially ionized clouds found by Redfield & Linsky (2008) on the basis of the star's location in Galactic coordinates and agreement of measured radial velocities with velocities predicted from the cloud velocity vectors. None of the stars show blue-shifted absorption indicative of an astrosphere, implying that the stars are in regions of ionized interstellar gas. Coupling astrospheric and local interstellar medium measurements is necessary to evaluate the host star electromagnetic and particle flux, which have profound impacts on the atmospheres of their orbiting planets. We present a table of all known exoplanets located within 20 pc of the Sun listing their interstellar properties and velocities predicted from the local cloud velocity vectors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.05375 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: STIS Spectrum of HD 192310 showing the stellar Lyman-α emission line of H I and interstellar absorption by H I and D I. Vertical lines mark the center of interstellar absorption by velocity component 1 and the ⊕ symbol marks the wavelength of the feature dominated by geocoronal emission, but which also includes a weaker contribution from the solar wind backscattered emission inseparable from the geocoronal emi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Reconstructed stellar emission lines and interstellar Mg II, Fe II, and D I absorption profiles for the line of sight to HD 192310. The blue (component 1), green (component 2), and orange (component 3) lines represent the individual interstellar absorption, while the red line represents the cumulative absorption by all components convolved with the instrumental line spread function. D I is comprised of two closely s… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Reconstructed stellar H I Lyman-α emission line (black line) for HD 192310 and interstellar absorption by component 1 (blue line), component 2 (green line), and component 3 (orange line). For each of the three interstellar components there are four absorption lines as …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Temperature and turbulent velocity fits for component 3 (≈16.5 km s−1 for ions listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Neutral hydrogen number density distributions surrounding HD 9826 (left) and HD192310 (right), each located at x = y = 0 AU. The LISM flow is coming in from the right. Left: density of hot H I surrounding HD 9826, with the line of sight from the Sun to HD 9826 at 39.6◦…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Expanded version of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

15 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., & Sauval, A. J. 2005, Cosmic Abundances as Records of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis, 336, 25 Ayres, T. R. 2010, ApJS, 187, 149 Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., Williams, E., Hauser, H., & Shirts, P. 1997, ApJL, 474, L115 Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., Fischer, D. A., et al. 1999, ApJ, 526, 916 Curiel, S., Cant´ o, J., Georgiev...

    work page 2005

  2. [8]

    (12.66) 8 a Data in parentheses are predicted from models. The velociti es from Redfield & Linsky (2008): http://lism.wesleyan.edu/LISMdynamics.html and column densities from Redfield & Linsky (2000): http://lism.wesleyan.edu/ColoradoLIC.html. b Distances are from GAIA DR2 ( Gaia Collaboration et al. 2016 ,

    work page 2008

  3. [9]

    Redfield, S., & Linsky, J. L. 2000, ApJ, 534, 825 Redfield, S., & Linsky, J. L. 2001, ApJ, 551, 413 Redfield, S., & Linsky, J. L. 2002, ApJS, 139, 439 Redfield, S., & Linsky, J. L. 2004a, ApJ, 602, 776 Redfield, S., & Linsky, J. L. 2004b, ApJ, 613, 1004 Redfield, S., & Linsky, J. L. 2008, ApJ, 673, 283-314 Redfield, S., & Linsky, J. L. 2015, ApJ, 812, 125 Rodrig...

    work page 2000

  4. [17]

    78 12.14 17.55 16.45 17.34 1 γ Cep GJ 903 13.54 118.99 +15.32 3.22 LIC (8.33) (18.04) 8 Ross 1020 GJ 3779 13.75 14.12 +82.43 13.01 NGP (-8.29) 8 47 UMa GJ 407 13.80 175.78 +63.37 5.04 LIC,NGP (5.31) (17.23) (12.91) 8 GJ 1214 h 14.65 26.16 +23.61 14.67 Mic,G,Oph –26.4 g 18.06g (–27.76) (–28.78) 6,8 HIP 79431 14.54 355.20 +22.97 11.37 G,Gem (–29.24) (–28.63...

    work page

  5. [25]

    D., & Frisch, P

    Slavin, J. D., & Frisch, P. C. 2008, A&A, 491, 53 Stassun, K. G., Collins, K. A., & Gaudi, B. S. 2017, AJ, 153, 136 Stone, E. C., Cummings, A. C., McDonald, F. B., et al. 2005, Science, 309, 2017 Stone, E. C., Cummings, A. C., McDonald, F. B., et al. 2008, Nature, 454, 71 van Belle, G. T., & von Braun, K. 2009, ApJ, 694,

    work page 2008

  6. [43]

    (20.21) 8 55 Cnc h GJ 324A 12.59 196.79 +37.70 5.95 LIC,Gem (14.75) (17.78) (27 .78) 8 GJ 1132 h 12.62 277.26 +7.76 13.52 G,Cet (-2.73) (8.82) 8 VHS J1256-1257 12.7 j 304.67 +49.90 17.76 Leo (-8.71) 8 HD 147513 GJ 9559 12.91 341.62 +7.21 5.38 G,Gem (–26.63) (–25 .30) 8 HD 40307 GJ 2046 12.94 268.81 –30.34 7.15 Blue,G,Vel 9.4 18.6 0 (7.63) (18.38) 6,8 HD 9...

    work page

  7. [96]

    G., Zank, G

    Gayley, K. G., Zank, G. P., Pauls, H. L., Frisch, P. C., & Welty, D. E. 1997, ApJ, 487, 259 Gr¨ unwaldt, H., Neugebauer, M., Hilchenbach, M., et al. 1997, Geophysical Research Letters, 24,

    work page 1997

  8. [146]

    G., Gloeckler, G., et al

    Izmodenov, V., Malama, Y. G., Gloeckler, G., et al. 2003, ApJ, 594, L59. Lammer, H., Chassefi` ere, E., Karatekin, ¨O., et al. 2013, SSRv, 174, 113 Lindler, D. 1999, CALSTIS Reference Guide (Greenbelt: NASA/LASP) Linsky, J. L., Draine, B. T., Moos, H. W., et al. 2006, ApJ, 647, 1106 Linsky, J. L., Bushinsky, R., Ayres, T., & France, K. 2012, ApJ, 757, 69 L...

    work page 2003

Show all 15 references
  1. [501]

    V., Heerikhuisen, J., Roytershteyn, V., et al

    Pogorelov, N. V., Heerikhuisen, J., Roytershteyn, V., et al . 2017, ApJ, 845,

    2017

  2. [679]

    STIS Instrument Handbook

    Hernandez, S., et al. 2011, “STIS Instrument Handbook” Version 13.0, (Baltimore: STScI) Howard, A. W., Johnson, J. A., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2011, ApJ, 730, 10 Jakosky, B. M., Brain, D., Chaffin, M., et al. 2018, Icarus, 315,

    2011

  3. [1085]

    Vidal-Madjar, A., Lecavelier des Etangs, A., D´ esert, J.-M ., et al

    18 Edelman et al. Vidal-Madjar, A., Lecavelier des Etangs, A., D´ esert, J.-M ., et al. 2003, Nature, 422, 143 Wood, B. E., Alexander, W. R., & Linsky, J. L. 1996, ApJ, 470, 1157 Wood, B. E., M¨ uller, H.-R., Zank, G. P., & Linsky, J. L. 2002, ApJ, 574, 412 Wood, B. E. 2004, L...

    2003

  4. [1163]

    Gry, C., & Jenkins, E. B. 2014, A&A, 567, A58 Gurnett, D. A., Kurth, W. S., Burlaga, L. F., & Ness, N. F. 2013, Science, 341, 1489 Heerikhuisen, J., Pogorelov, N. V., Florinski, V., et al. 2008, ApJ, 682,

    2014

  5. [1492]

    Echim, M. M. and Lemaire, J. and Lie-Svendsen, Ø. 2011, Surveys in Geophysics, 32, 1 Ehrenreich, D., Bourrier, V., Wheatley, P. J., et al. 2015, Nature, 522, 459 Fossati, L., Haswell, C. A., Froning, C. S., et al. 2010, ApJL, 714, L222 France, K., Linsky, J. L., Tian, F., Fron...

    2011

  6. [2001]

    E., Linsky, J

    2001, ApJL, 547, L49 Wood, B. E., Linsky, J. L., H´ ebrard, G., Williger, G. M., Moos, H. W., & Blair, W. P. 2004, ApJ, 609, 838 Wood, B. E., Redfield, S., Linsky, J. L., M¨ uller, H.-R., & Zank, G. P. 2005, 13th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems and the Sun, 56...

    2001

  7. [2018]

    c Interstellar partially ionized clouds in the line of sight t o the star

    unless otherwise noted. c Interstellar partially ionized clouds in the line of sight t o the star. For lines of sight with predicted interstellar ve locities, the first listed cloud is predicted to be the dominant absorber. d (1) This paper, (2) Redfield & Linsky (2008), (3) W...

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.