Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

What's Wrong with Hebrew NLP? And How to Make it Right

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1908.05453 v1 pith:6IUQJHPL submitted 2019-08-15 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords hebrewindustryjointlanguageslimitsmorphologyonlpperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

For languages with simple morphology, such as English, automatic annotation pipelines such as spaCy or Stanford's CoreNLP successfully serve projects in academia and the industry. For many morphologically-rich languages (MRLs), similar pipelines show sub-optimal performance that limits their applicability for text analysis in research and the industry.The sub-optimal performance is mainly due to errors in early morphological disambiguation decisions, which cannot be recovered later in the pipeline, yielding incoherent annotations on the whole. In this paper we describe the design and use of the Onlp suite, a joint morpho-syntactic parsing framework for processing Modern Hebrew texts. The joint inference over morphology and syntax substantially limits error propagation, and leads to high accuracy. Onlp provides rich and expressive output which already serves diverse academic and commercial needs. Its accompanying online demo further serves educational activities, introducing Hebrew NLP intricacies to researchers and non-researchers alike.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond N-Grams: Rethinking Evaluation Metrics and Strategies for Multilingual Abstractive Summarization

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across eight languages, n-gram metrics such as ROUGE correlate less with human ratings in fusional languages than in isolating and agglutinative ones, while the neural metric COMET correlates better, especially in low...

Pith tools