Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 51 references

Carbon-related Bilayers: Nanoscale Building Blocks for Self-Assembly Nanomanufacturing

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that boron- and nitrogen-doped carbon bilayers are stable two-dimensional building blocks that can self-assemble into bulk crystals, one hard and covalent, the other graphite-like and layered.

desk verdict A competent DFT paper with new stable bilayer predictions, but the self-assembly framing oversells and the 3D crystals lack a phonon check. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06218 v2 pith:3NLVBV43 submitted 2019-08-17 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

B. Ipaves , J. F. Justo , L. V. C. Assali This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords self-assembly2Dbuildingblocksdopedgraphenebilayerscarbonnitrideborondensityfunctionaltheoryphononstabilitybulkmodulus
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to find nanoscale two-dimensional building blocks that could assemble themselves into macroscopic structures, and argues that boron- and nitrogen-containing carbon bilayers fill that role. It reports that a graphene-like bilayer labeled NCCB, formed by stacking a carbon-nitrogen layer on a carbon-boron layer, is dynamically stable and can be stacked in two distinct ways to form energetically stable bulk crystals. One stacking gives a covalent hard solid with a bulk modulus of 328.9 GPa and an indirect gap of 0.65 eV; the other gives a graphite-like layered solid with a binding energy near 70 meV/atom and a gap of 1.246 eV. If correct, these are new synthesizable materials, and the NCCB bilayer becomes a concrete candidate for self-assembled nanostructures.

What carries the argument

The central object is the NCCB bilayer, a graphene-like two-layer sheet in which one layer is a 1:1 carbon-nitrogen network and the other is a 1:1 carbon-boron network, stacked so that interlayer carbon-carbon bonds of about 1.44 to 1.67 Å form. It carries the argument because its mixed faces give it both a strong covalent interior and complementary donor-acceptor faces: nitrogen-rich faces can bind to boron-rich faces of neighboring bilayers, providing the inter-bilayer driving force that pure graphene or homogeneous bilayers lack. The paper uses phonon spectra with no imaginary frequencies as the criterion for dynamical stability, and validates its total-energy methods by reproducing the known lattice parameters and exfoliation energy of graphene and graphite.

What would settle it

Compute the full phonon spectrum and the energy-versus-interlayer-separation curve for the two proposed NCCB bulk crystals using a method that treats covalent and dispersion bonding without relying on the same functional approximation; if either crystal shows imaginary phonon modes at its reported lattice parameters, or if the interlayer minimum disappears, the central stability claim is falsified. An experimental route would be to search for the predicted interlayer carbon-carbon distance of 1.44 to 1.66 Å and the boron-nitrogen distance of 1.645 Å in a synthesized sample using diffraction or spectroscopy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using first-principles density functional calculations with van der Waals corrections, the paper finds that 50% nitrogen-doped graphene monolayers and 50% boron-doped monolayers are dynamically unstable, but stacking such monolayers into bilayers stabilizes them. Among the stable bilayers, NCCB is singled out because its two layers are bonded by short carbon-carbon links, about 1.66 to 1.67 Å, which the paper interprets as covalent, and because its two faces are chemically complementary: nitrogen on one face acts as an electron donor and boron on the other as an acceptor. This pairing provides a natural driving force between neighboring NCCB bilayers, so the bilayer can serve as a self-assembling nanoscale building block. Stacking NCCB bilayers in two different registries yields two distinct 3D crystals: a rigid covalent solid and a weakly bound layered solid. The paper claims both are energetically stable and that their properties make the NCCB bilayer a promising building block for self-assembly nanomanufacturing.

Load-bearing premise

The predictions stand or fall on whether the approximate quantum-mechanical treatment of electrons, including its van der Waals correction, correctly describes the short bonds between stacked layers; if it overbinds the layers, the predicted stability and the 328.9 GPa bulk modulus would not survive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The same NCCB building block can assemble into two thermodynamically distinct solids, so the stacking registry alone switches the material between hard, covalent behavior and soft, layered behavior.
  • A stable 1:1 carbon-nitride bilayer would exceed the previously claimed 37.5% nitrogen stability limit for hexagonal carbon nitride monolayers, opening a new stoichiometry for carbon nitride materials.
  • The hard NCCB crystal has a bulk modulus of 328.9 GPa, placing it in the range of hard materials and suggesting possible use in wear-resistant or protective applications if synthesis is achieved.
  • The graphite-like NCCB crystal has weak inter-bilayer binding near 70 meV/atom, comparable to graphite, so it could plausibly be exfoliated or intercalated while retaining a semiconducting gap of 1.246 eV.
  • The fact that stable bilayers exist where monolayers are unstable suggests that other multilayer stacks, such as trilayers or sandwich heterostructures, may also serve as viable self-assembly building blocks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The donor-acceptor B-N face pairing suggests a broader design rule for two-dimensional building blocks: bilayers with chemically complementary faces should stack more strongly than homogeneous pairs, a rule that could be tested with other donor-acceptor substitutions such as phosphorus or oxygen.
  • Because density functional theory typically underestimates band gaps, the true gaps of the two NCCB crystals are likely larger than the reported 0.65 eV and 1.246 eV; if so, the practical utility of the small-gap crystal as a semiconductor could be better or worse depending on the actual value.
  • The predicted interlayer boron-nitrogen distance of 1.645 Å is much longer than the covalent B-N bond in hexagonal boron nitride, so measuring vibrational modes or pair distribution functions in a synthesized sample would directly test whether this is a genuine dative bond or an artifact of the computational functional.
  • The two stackings differ only by registry, suggesting a twist-angle engineering route not explored in the paper: controlled rotation between NCCB bilayers could continuously tune electronic and mechanical properties beyond the two computed cases.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports DFT calculations (optB88-vdW) on nitrogen- and boron-functionalized graphene-like monolayers and bilayers. It finds that h-CN and h-CB monolayers are dynamically unstable, while among the bilayers the NCCN, NCNC, and NCCB configurations in AA and AB stackings are dynamically stable and BCCB is not. The authors then stack the NCCB bilayer to construct two hexagonal 3D crystals: a covalent crystal with lattice parameters a=2.590 Å and c=8.417 Å, an interlayer C–C distance of 1.439 Å, a B–N inter-bilayer distance of 1.645 Å, binding energy 0.16 eV/atom, bulk modulus 328.9 GPa, and an indirect gap of 0.65 eV; and a graphite-like crystal with a=2.563 Å and c=5.090 Å, an inter-bilayer distance of 2.685 Å, bulk modulus 79.3 GPa, binding energy 70 meV/atom, and an indirect gap of 1.246 eV. On this basis the paper concludes that the NCCB bilayer is the best 2D building block for self-assembly nanomanufacturing.

Significance. If the central predictions hold, the paper offers a conceptually interesting route to 2D building blocks with covalent interlayer bonding, and the two predicted NCCB crystals are new candidate materials with potentially useful mechanical and electronic properties. The authors do several things well: they state convergence criteria, benchmark the methodology against graphene and graphite, perform phonon calculations for the bilayers, and reproduce the independent structural data of ref 39 for the NCCN/NCNC systems. The value of the paper lies in concrete, falsifiable predictions of specific structures and properties. However, the significance is currently capped by the lack of validation of the exchange–correlation functional in the short-interlayer-bond regime, which is precisely the regime that determines whether the proposed materials exist at all.

major comments (3)
  1. [Computational Details; Functionalized graphene-like bilayer crystals] The principal claims of the paper—dynamically stable NCCB bilayers, two energetically stable 3D crystals, the bulk modulus of 328.9 GPa, and the viability of NCCB as a self-assembly building block—are computed with the optB88-vdW functional at interlayer C–C distances of 1.439–1.672 Å and a B–N interlayer distance of 1.645 Å. These distances are in the covalent/dative bonding regime, not the van der Waals regime for which optB88-vdW is normally validated. The only benchmarks presented (graphene and graphite, with interlayer spacings near 3.3 Å) do not exercise this regime, and the agreement with ref 39 concerns in-plane structural parameters and gaps, not interlayer bonding. Please provide a cross-check of the binding energetics and equilibrium interlayer distances of at least one central structure (for example, AB-NCCB or the covalent NCCB crystal) with an independent method, such as SCAN/rVV10, RPA, or a CCSD(T) cluster model. Without this, the load-bearing predictions are conditional on an unvalidated functional extrapolation.
  2. [Results, Table 1; Discussion] The suitability of the NCCB bilayer as a building block is argued from its small energy of formation, but the paper reports only formation energies relative to AB-NCCN (ΔEf = 0.486 eV for AB-NCCB and 0.687 eV for AA-NCCB in Table 1), not the absolute values from Eq. (1). Since Eq. (1) references elemental C, N2, and β-B, the absolute formation energies are presumably positive; the reader therefore cannot assess whether 'small' means thermodynamically accessible, especially in comparison with competing bulk phases. Please report the absolute Ef values and, if necessary, a brief discussion of kinetic accessibility or of why a positive formation energy does not preclude synthesis.
  3. [Functionalized graphene-like bilayer crystals] The two 3D crystals are characterized as energetically stable based on geometry optimization from one stacking arrangement per crystal. No phonon spectra, elastic-constant calculation, or search over stacking variants (for example, translations or rotations of adjacent bilayers) is reported. Given the abstract's broader claim that these crystals are stable and that NCCB could guarantee stability and rigidity, the stability assessment should be strengthened with at least a vibrational analysis of the 3D structures, or the paper should explicitly state that only local energetic stability under the chosen stacking is being claimed.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Computational Details] The k-point grid for the 3D crystal calculations is not specified; the stated 16×16×1 grid applies to the 2D systems. Please provide the 3D sampling and the details of the Birch–Murnaghan fits (for example, whether all ionic positions were relaxed at each volume).
  2. [Computational Details, Eq. (2)] The binding energy is defined as a total-energy difference but is quoted per atom (70 meV/atom and 0.16 eV/atom). Please state explicitly how the per-atom normalization is applied, including for the bilayer building-block unit.
  3. [Figure 5 caption] The caption calls h the 'intra-bilayer distance,' while in Figure 1 h is defined as the inter-layer distance within the bilayer. Please use one consistent notation throughout.
  4. [Throughout] The text contains several typographical errors: 'iteractions' (Computational Details), 'Monkhorst-Packk' (Computational Details), 'struture' (Table 1 header), 'rigth' (Figure 1 caption), and 'caried' (Discussion).
  5. [Functionalized graphene-like bilayer crystals] The assignment of the B–N interlayer contact as 'dative' is interpretive. A Bader charge or electron-localization-function analysis, or at least an explicit computational criterion for dative bonding, would make the assignment more transparent.
  6. [Reproducibility] Please provide the atomic coordinates of the six stable bilayers and the two 3D crystals, or deposit them in an open repository, since the structures are not fully recoverable from the schematic figures alone.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular steps: central claims are computed first-principles results benchmarked against external data, and the paper's self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. Bilayer stability, phonon spectra, formation energies, and the stabilities of the two stacked NCCB crystals are computed by DFT/vdW total-energy minimizations rather than constructed from the quantities they predict. The only numerical fit, the Birch-Murnaghan equation of state used to obtain K0 = 328.9 GPa, is a standard reduction of independently computed energy-versus-volume data and is not an input to the physics. The paper benchmarks its methodology against external graphene/graphite data and against an independent GGA calculation (ref 39) for NCCN/NCNC; these are external comparison points, not outputs of the present fit. The self-citations (refs 6, 14, 32, 33) concern the general building-block concept, dative-bond examples, and formation-energy methodology; none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the justification that NCCB stacking forms stable crystals. The choice of NCCB as a building block is justified by computed energies of formation and interaction character, and the 3D stability is then recomputed from scratch. The skeptic's concern about optB88-vdW accuracy at short interlayer distances is a physical and functional-validity risk, not a circularity, because the paper's predictions do not reduce by construction to its inputs. Accordingly, no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters are needed for the central stability predictions; the only numerical fits are the Birch-Murnaghan equation-of-state parameters, which are outputs rather than inputs. The paper introduces no ad hoc entities such as new particles or forces. The main burden rests on the DFT functional choice and the limited set of stacking geometries explored; these are captured in the axioms above.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The optB88-vdW functional adequately describes the electronic structure and interlayer interactions of B/N-doped carbon bilayers.
    Used throughout; the paper validates on graphene and graphite, but the short interlayer distances in NCCN/NCCB (1.44-1.66 Å) are outside that validation range and are interpreted as covalent rather than van der Waals.
  • domain assumption A structure is dynamically stable if its phonon dispersion has no imaginary frequencies.
    This criterion is applied in the Results section to accept NCCN, NCNC, NCCB and to reject h-CN, h-CB, and BCCB; it assumes harmonic phonons at zero temperature are sufficient for stability.
  • domain assumption The energy of formation reference states (C in graphene, N in N2, B in beta-boron) provide a valid basis for comparing stability.
    Defined by Eq. (1) and used for relative stability; the ranking could change with different references, though the structural stability conclusions do not depend on it.
  • domain assumption The two NCCB stacking arrangements considered are representative of self-assembled products.
    The building-block and self-assembly conclusion in the Discussion is based only on these two optimized stackings; other registries or defects could alter the conclusion.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Carbon-related Bilayers: Nanoscale Building Blocks for Self-Assembly Nanomanufacturing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3NLVBV43

@misc{pith2026190806218,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Carbon-related Bilayers: Nanoscale Building Blocks for Self-Assembly Nanomanufacturing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3NLVBV43}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06218}
}
read the original abstract

Using a first-principles total energy methodology, we investigated the properties of graphene-like carbon mono and bilayers, functionalized with nitrogen and boron atoms. The resulting stable structures were explored in terms of their potential use as nanoscale two-dimensional building blocks for self-assembly of macroscopic structures. We initially considered graphene monolayers functionalized with nitrogen and boron, but none of them was dynamically stable, in terms of the respective layer phonon spectra. Then, we considered the functionalized graphene-like bilayers (labeled as NCCN, NCNC, BCCB, and NCCB), analyzing their stability, electronic and mechanical properties, and chemical reactivity. We found that while the NCCN, NCNC, and NCCB bilayers were stable, the BCCB one was not. Additionally, the NCCN and NCCB bilayers were explored as potential two-dimensional building blocks for nanostructure self-assembly, which could form stable bulk structures. Particularly, the NCCB bilayer seemed the best choice as a building block, since the resulting 3D crystals, formed by stacking NCCB bilayers, were energetically stable.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.06218 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of (a) the top view of the monolayers 50% doped graphene [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Phonon dispersion of (a) AB-NCCN, (b) AA-NCCN, (c) AB-NCNC, (d) AA￾NCNC, (e) AB-NCCB, and (f) AA-NCCB along the main high symmetry directions of the BZ of the hexagonal lattice. reference value. Then, this configuration was followed by the AA-NCCN one, whose energy of formation was only 35 meV higher than that with the AB-stacking. In the AB-NCCN bilayer, the C-N interatomic distances, d and d 0 , were 1.471 ˚A, clo… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Electronic band structures of (a) AB-NCCN, (b) AA-NCCN, (c) AB-NCNC, (d) AA-NCNC, (e) AB-NCCB, and (f) AA-NCCB configurations, along the main high-symmetry directions of the BZ. The figure also shows the total (black) and projected density of states on the s orbitals of C (purple) and N (blue) atoms, and on the p orbitals of C (red), N (green), and B (pink) atoms, in units of number of states/eV. Ev represents the v… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Electronic charge density distributions of the NCCN and NCCB bilayers in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic representation of (a) the NCCB covalent crystal and (b) the NCCB [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nanostructures and nanotechnology; Cambridge University Press, 2015

    Natelson, D. Nanostructures and nanotechnology; Cambridge University Press, 2015

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Springer handbook of nanotechnology; Springer, 2017

    Bhushan, B. Springer handbook of nanotechnology; Springer, 2017

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Graphene-based materials: synthesis, characterization, properties, and applications

    Huang, X.; Yin, Z.; Wu, S.; Qi, X.; He, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Yan, Q.; Boey, F.; Zhang, H. Graphene-based materials: synthesis, characterization, properties, and applications. Small 2011, 7, 1876--1902

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    Merkle, R. C. Molecular building blocks and development strategies for molecular nanotechnology. Nanotechnology 2000, 11, 89--99

    work page 2000

  5. [5]

    J.; Mearns, F.; Yang, W.; Liu, J

    Gooding, J. J.; Mearns, F.; Yang, W.; Liu, J. Self-assembled monolayers into the 21st century: recent advances and applications. Electroanalysis 2003, 15, 81--96

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    C.; Justo, J

    Garcia, J. C.; Justo, J. F.; Machado, W. V. M.; Assali, L. V. C. Functionalized adamantane: building blocks for nanostructure self-assembly. Physical Review B 2009, 80, 125421

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Lu, W.; Lieber, C. M. Nanoelectronics from the bottom up. Nature Materials 2007, 6, 841--850

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    P.; Qiao, S

    Liu, J.; Wickramaratne, N. P.; Qiao, S. Z.; Jaroniec, M. Molecular-based design and emerging applications of nanoporous carbon spheres. Nature Materials 2015, 14, 763--774

    work page 2015

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Self-assembly: from surfactants to nanoparticles, 1st ed.; Wiley: New Jersey, 2019

    Nagarajan, R., Ed. Self-assembly: from surfactants to nanoparticles, 1st ed.; Wiley: New Jersey, 2019

    2019

  2. [10]

    M.; Liz-Marzan, L

    Grzelczak, M.; Vermant, J.; Furst, E. M.; Liz-Marzan, L. M. Directed self-assembly of nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3591--3605

    2010

  3. [11]

    J.; Werner, P.; Zacharias, M

    Fan, H. J.; Werner, P.; Zacharias, M. Semiconductor nanowires: from self-organization to patterned growth. Small 2006, 2, 700--717

    2006

  4. [12]

    M.; Park, M.-S.; Jiang, L.; Kim, J

    Sun, Z.; Liao, T.; Dou, Y.; Hwang, S. M.; Park, M.-S.; Jiang, L.; Kim, J. H.; Dou, S. X. Generalized self-assembly of scalable two-dimensional transition metal oxide nanosheets. Nature Communications 2014, 5, 3813

    2014

  5. [13]

    An atlas of two-dimensional materials

    Mir \'o , P.; Audiffred, M.; Heine, T. An atlas of two-dimensional materials. Chemical Society Reviews 2014, 43, 6537--6554

    2014

  6. [14]

    C.; de Lima, D

    Garcia, J. C.; de Lima, D. B.; Assali, L. V. C.; Justo, J. F. Group IV graphene- and graphane-like nanosheets. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2011, 115, 13242--13246

    2011

  7. [15]

    J.; Bunch, J

    Akinwande, D.; Brennan, C. J.; Bunch, J. S.; Egberts, P.; Felts, J. R.; Gao, H.; Huang, R.; Kim, J.-S.; Li, T.; Li, Y. et al. A review on mechanics and mechanical properties of 2D materials - graphene and beyond. Extreme Mechanics Letters 2017, 13, 42--77

    2017

  8. [16]

    S.; Bechtel, H

    Fang, H.; Battaglia, C.; Carraro, C.; Nemsak, S.; Ozdol, B.; Kang, J. S.; Bechtel, H. A.; Desai, S. B.; Kronast, F.; Unal, A. A. et al. Strong interlayer coupling in van der Waals heterostructures built from single-layer chalcogenides. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sc...

    2014

  9. [17]

    S.; Mishchenko, A.; Carvalho, A.; Castro Neto, A

    Novoselov, K. S.; Mishchenko, A.; Carvalho, A.; Castro Neto, A. H. 2D materials and van der Waals heterostructures. Science 2016, 353, aac9439

    2016

  10. [18]

    K.; Grigorieva, I

    Geim, A. K.; Grigorieva, I. V. Van der Waals heterostructures. Nature 2013, 499, 419--425

    2013

  11. [19]

    V.; Jalil, R.; Belle, B

    Britnell, L.; Gorbachev, R. V.; Jalil, R.; Belle, B. D.; Schedin, F.; Mishchenko, A.; Georgiou, T.; Katsnelson, M. I.; Eaves, L.; Morozov, S. V. et al. Field-effect tunneling transistor based on vertical graphene heterostructures. Science 2012, 335, 947--950

    2012

  12. [20]

    J.; Gholinia, A.; Jalil, R.; Romani, S.; Britnell, L.; Elias, D

    Haigh, S. J.; Gholinia, A.; Jalil, R.; Romani, S.; Britnell, L.; Elias, D. C.; Novoselov, K. S.; Ponomarenko, L. A.; Geim, A. K.; Gorbachev, R. Cross-sectional imaging of individual layers and buried interfaces of graphene-based heterostructures and superlattices . Nature Mate...

    2012

  13. [21]

    Tunable band structures of heterostructured bilayers with transition-metal dichalcogenide and MXene monolayer

    Ma, Z.; Hu, Z.; Zhao, X.; Tang, Q.; Wu, D.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, L. Tunable band structures of heterostructured bilayers with transition-metal dichalcogenide and MXene monolayer. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2014, 118, 5593--5599

    2014

  14. [22]

    Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2009, 21, 395502

    Giannozzi, P.; et al., QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials . Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2009, 21, 395502

    2009

  15. [23]

    C.; Lundqvist, B

    Dion, M.; Rydberg, H.; Schr \"o der, E.; Langreth, D. C.; Lundqvist, B. I. Van der Waals density functional for general geometries. Physical Review Letters 2004, 92, 246401

    2004

  16. [24]

    R.; Michaelides, A

    Klime s , J.; Bowler, D. R.; Michaelides, A. Chemical accuracy for the van der Waals density functional. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2009, 22, 022201

    2009

  17. [25]

    From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method

    Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Physical Review B 1999, 59, 1758--1775

    1999

  18. [26]

    J.; Pack, J

    Monkhorst, H. J.; Pack, J. D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Physical Review B 1976, 13, 5188--5192

    1976

  19. [27]

    Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory

    Baroni, S.; De Gironcoli, S.; Dal Corso, A.; Giannozzi, P. Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory. Reviews of Modern Physics 2001, 73, 515--562

    2001

  20. [28]

    R.; Michaelides, A

    Klime s , J.; Bowler, D. R.; Michaelides, A. Van der Waals density functionals applied to solids. Physical Review B 2011, 83, 195131

    2011

  21. [29]

    Structure of graphite by neutron-diffraction

    Trucano, P.; Chen, R. Structure of graphite by neutron-diffraction. Nature 1975, 258, 136--137

    1975

  22. [30]

    Tight-binding description of graphene

    Reich, S.; Maultzsch, J.; Thomsen, C.; Ordej\'on, P. Tight-binding description of graphene. Physical Review B 2002, 66, 035412

    2002

  23. [31]

    H.; Guinea, F.; Peres, N

    Castro Neto, A. H.; Guinea, F.; Peres, N. M. R.; Novoselov, K. S.; Geim, A. K. The electronic properties of graphene. Reviews of Modern Physics 2009, 81, 109--162

    2009

  24. [32]

    Ayres, F.; Assali, L. V. C.; Machado, W. V. M.; Justo, J. F. Role of intrinsic defects in the electronic and optical properties of - HgI2 . Applied Physics Letters 2006, 88, 011918

    2006

  25. [33]

    F.; Machado, W

    Larico, R.; Justo, J. F.; Machado, W. V. M.; Assali, L. V. C. Electronic properties and hyperfine fields of nickel-related complexes in diamond. Physical Review B 2009, 79, 115202

    2009

  26. [34]

    V.; Knizhnik, A

    Lebedeva, I. V.; Knizhnik, A. A.; Popov, A. M.; Lozovik, Y. E.; Potapkin, B. V. Interlayer interaction and relative vibrations of bilayer graphene. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2011, 13, 5687--5695

    2011

  27. [35]

    Shi, Z.; Kutana, A.; Yakobson, B. I. How much N-doping can graphene sustain? Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2015, 6, 106--112

    2015

  28. [36]

    High-temperature superconductivity in heavily N- or B-doped graphene

    Zhou, J.; Sun, Q.; Wang, Q.; Jena, P. High-temperature superconductivity in heavily N- or B-doped graphene. Physical Review B 2015, 92, 064505

    2015

  29. [37]

    First-principles determination of the structural, vibrational and thermodynamic properties of diamond, graphite, and derivatives

    Mounet, N.; Marzari, N. First-principles determination of the structural, vibrational and thermodynamic properties of diamond, graphite, and derivatives. Physical Review B 2005, 71, 205214

    2005

  30. [38]

    Phonon dispersion of graphite by inelastic x-ray scattering

    Mohr, M.; Maultzsch, J.; Dobard z i \'c , E.; Reich, S.; Milo s evi \'c , I.; Damnjanovi \'c , M.; Bosak, A.; Krisch, M.; Thomsen, C. Phonon dispersion of graphite by inelastic x-ray scattering. Physical Review B 2007, 76, 035439

    2007

  31. [39]

    V.; Minaev, B

    Bondarchuk, S. V.; Minaev, B. F. Two isomeric solid carbon nitrides with 1:1 stoichiometry which exhibit strong mechanical anisotropy. New Journal of Chemistry 2017, 41, 13140--13148

    2017

  32. [40]

    First-principle calculation study of tri-s-triazine-based g- C3N4 : a review

    Zhu, B.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, B.; Yu, J. First-principle calculation study of tri-s-triazine-based g- C3N4 : a review. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2018, 224, 983--999

    2018

  33. [41]

    Covalently coupled hybrid of graphitic carbon nitride with reduced graphene oxide as a superior performance lithium-ion battery anode

    Fu, Y.; Zhu, J.; Hu, C.; Wu, X.; Wang, X. Covalently coupled hybrid of graphitic carbon nitride with reduced graphene oxide as a superior performance lithium-ion battery anode. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 12555--12564

    2014

  34. [42]

    Reddy, A. L. M.; Srivastava, A.; Gowda, S. R.; Gullapalli, H.; Dubey, M.; Ajayan, P. M. Synthesis of nitrogen-doped graphene films for lithium battery application. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 6337--6342

    2010

  35. [43]

    M.; Lee, J

    Jeong, H. M.; Lee, J. W.; Shin, W. H.; Choi, Y. J.; Shin, H. J.; Kang, J. K.; Choi, J. W. Nitrogen-doped graphene for high-performance ultracapacitors and the importance of nitrogen-doped sites at basal planes. Nano Letters 2011, 11, 2472--2477

    2011

  36. [44]

    K.; Wang, H.; Guo, J.; Dai, H

    Wang, X.; Li, X.; Zhang, L.; Yoon, Y.; Weber, P. K.; Wang, H.; Guo, J.; Dai, H. N-doping of graphene through electrothermal reactions with ammonia. Science 2009, 324, 768--771

    2009

  37. [45]

    Metal-free catalysis of ammonia--borane dehydrogenation/regeneration for a highly efficient and facilely recyclable hydrogen-storage material

    Tang, Z.; Chen, X.; Chen, H.; Wu, L.; Yu, X. Metal-free catalysis of ammonia--borane dehydrogenation/regeneration for a highly efficient and facilely recyclable hydrogen-storage material. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2013, 52, 5832--5835

    2013

  38. [46]

    Graphene, hexagonal boron nitride, and their heterostructures: properties and applications

    Wang, J.; Ma, F.; Sun, M. Graphene, hexagonal boron nitride, and their heterostructures: properties and applications. RSC Advances 2017, 7, 16801--16822

    2017

  39. [47]

    L.; Louie, S

    Sun, H.; Jhi, S.-H.; Roundy, D.; Cohen, M. L.; Louie, S. G. Structural forms of cubic BC2N . Physical Review B 2001, 64, 094108

    2001

  40. [48]

    Hexagonal BC2N with remarkably high hardness

    Liu, L.; Zhao, Z.; Yu, T.; Zhang, S.; Lin, J.; Yang, G. Hexagonal BC2N with remarkably high hardness. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 6801--6807

    2018

  41. [49]

    S.; Politzer, P

    Brinck, T.; Murray, J. S.; Politzer, P. A computational analysis of the bonding in boron trifluoride and boron trichloride and their complexes with ammonia. Inorganic Chemistry 1993, 32, 2622--2625

    1993

  42. [50]

    Finite elastic strain of cubic crystals

    Birch, F. Finite elastic strain of cubic crystals. Physical Review 1947, 71, 809

    1947

  43. [51]

    Elastic constants of boron nitride

    Grimsditch, M.; Zouboulis, E.; Polian, A. Elastic constants of boron nitride. Journal of Applied Physics 1994, 76, 832--834 mcitethebibliography document methodology.tex0000664000000000000000000001225313525576130012644 0ustar rootroot Computational Details The calculations wer...

    1994

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.