On the stability of laminar flows between plates

Bernard Helffer; Yaniv Almog

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 50 references

On the stability of laminar flows between plates

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Steady laminar shear flows with strictly monotone velocity profiles between parallel plates are linearly stable in the high-Reynolds limit, with explicitly quantified exponential decay.

desk verdict Genuinely new Orr-Sommerfeld resolvent and semigroup estimates for monotone shear flows beyond Couette, honest about scope, but skipped proof details in load-bearing lemmas make a conditional verdict the right call. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06328 v2 pith:QAF23X2Y submitted 2019-08-17 math-ph math.MP

Yaniv Almog , Bernard Helffer This is my paper · ORCID

classification math-phmath.MP MSC 76E0535Q3076D0547A10 PACS 47.20.Ft47.15.-x

keywords linearstabilitylaminarflowOrr-SommerfeldoperatorRayleighhighReynoldsnumberCouettesemigroupestimatesAiryfunctions

topics Navier-Stokes Regularity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that a broad family of steady laminar flows between parallel plates remains linearly stable as viscosity tends to zero. The flows are horizontal shear flows $(U(x_2),0)$ whose velocity profile $U$ is strictly monotone, and either nearly linear or strictly convex/concave. For both no-slip and fixed-traction boundary conditions, and for longitudinal periods $L$ satisfying $L\varepsilon \ll 1$, the linearized semigroup decays exponentially in time, with decay rate governed by $\varepsilon (L\varepsilon)^{-2/3}$. The proof reduces stability to uniform resolvent estimates for the Orr-Sommerfeld operator and its inviscid Rayleigh limit, with viscous boundary layers described by complex Airy functions. This supplies the linear input needed for nonlinear stability arguments and sharpens previously known transition thresholds for channel flows.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the Orr-Sommerfeld operator $B^\#_{\lambda,\alpha,\beta}=(L_\beta-\beta\lambda)(d^2/dx^2-\alpha^2)-i\beta U''$ on $L^2(-1,1)$, where $L_\beta=-d^2/dx^2+i\beta U$, together with its inviscid limit, the Rayleigh operator $A_{\lambda,\alpha}=(U+i\lambda)(-d^2/dx^2+\alpha^2)+U''$. After a Hodge decomposition and a stream-function Fourier reduction, stability is reduced to uniform bounds on $(B^\#_{\lambda,\alpha,\beta})^{-1}$ over all Fourier modes. Those bounds are assembled from Hardy-inequality and turning-point estimates for $A^{-1}$, resolvent estimates for Schr\"odinger operators with purely imaginary potentials, and viscous boundary layers built from complex Airy functions and the generalized Airy function $A_0$.

What would settle it

Run a high-resolution spectral computation of the linearized operator (the Orr-Sommerfeld problem) for a monotone profile with $U''\neq 0$ and small $\varepsilon$, at the edge of the claimed stability region: if any eigenvalue of $T^\#_P$ crosses into the right half-plane for some $L$ with $L\varepsilon \ll 1$, the theorem fails. Equivalently, check numerically whether the semigroup norm ever exceeds the stated $C L^{1/3-\hat\delta}\varepsilon^{-7/6-\hat\delta} e^{-\varepsilon\Upsilon (L\varepsilon)^{-2/3} t}$ bound; existing data for Poiseuille flow lie outside the theorem because $U'(0)=0$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for profiles $U$ in a suitable compact class $S_r$, with either $\inf |U''| \ge 1/r$ or $\delta_2(U)$ sufficiently small, the semigroup $e^{-t T^\#_P(U,\varepsilon,L)}$ acting on perturbations with zero longitudinal average satisfies an exponential decay bound. For the strictly convex/concave case the theorem gives $\|e^{-t T^\#_P}(I-\Pi)\| \le C L^{1/3-\hat\delta}\varepsilon^{-7/6-\hat\delta} e^{-\varepsilon\Upsilon (L\varepsilon)^{-2/3} t}$, and for nearly Couette flows the stronger $C L^{2/3}\varepsilon^{-5/6} e^{-\varepsilon\Upsilon (L\varepsilon)^{-2/3} t}$. The same statement holds for both fixed-traction and no-slip boundary conditions. Together with the explicit decay of the longitudinal average, this establishes linear stability of the base flow in the limit $\varepsilon \to 0$.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the flow profile being strictly monotone across the channel, meaning its derivative never vanishes, so the proof does not cover profiles like Poiseuille flow that have a stationary point in the middle.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For every profile covered by the theorem, perturbations with zero longitudinal average decay exponentially, while the longitudinal average decays only at the diffusion rate; the combination gives a stable semigroup.
The exponential rates are explicit: in the nearly Couette case they are controlled by the leftmost eigenvalue $\nu_1$ of a complex Airy operator for fixed traction, and by the optimized constant $\hat\mu_m$ for no-slip conditions.
The result extends rigorous stability of Couette flow to a whole open class of nearby profiles and to profiles with nonzero curvature, under both boundary conditions.
The resolvent bounds are uniform in the longitudinal Fourier mode, which is exactly what permits the long period $L\ll \varepsilon^{-1}$ in the statement.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper, a natural next step is nonlinear stability: with these linear semigroup bounds, a bootstrap argument should show that sufficiently small perturbations of these profiles remain close to the laminar flow for a time of order $\varepsilon^{-1}(L\varepsilon)^{2/3}$ or longer.
The monotonicity assumption is probably close to sharp: the Poiseuille profile, which violates it because $U'(0)=0$, is numerically unstable at Reynolds number near 5772, so any extension to non-monotone profiles would need to engage Tollmien-Schlichting mechanisms that this proof does not touch.
A direct numerical test is available: measure the decay rate of small perturbations of Couette and of a strictly convex profile and compare the predicted exponent $2/3$ in $(L\varepsilon)^{-2/3}$; deviations would signal a missing spectral mechanism.
The improved prefactor in the nearly Couette case suggests that curvature of the profile is what forces the slower $L^{1/3-\hat\delta}\varepsilon^{-7/6-\hat\delta}$ decay, and the same pattern should appear in resolvent bounds for intermediate curvature strengths.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know. First, this is the first rigorous resolvent and semigroup estimate for the Orr-Sommerfeld operator for a general class of monotone shear profiles, not just Couette flow. Second, the paper is honest about what it does not cover: strict monotonicity (inf |U'| > 0) is assumed in the abstract and in Assumption 2.14, and the known Poiseuille instability is acknowledged in the introduction. The reader's conditional verdict is right.

What is actually new: Section 4's inverse estimates for the inviscid Rayleigh operator, Section 5's refinements of the Schrodinger resolvent estimates, and the Airy boundary-layer constructions for the no-slip problem in Sections 6 and 8. The main theorems (2.15 and 2.16) give explicit semigroup decay at the enhanced dissipation rate (L eps)^{-2/3} with matching powers of L and eps, for both traction and no-slip boundary conditions. The Hodge decomposition and zero-flux projection setup is careful, and the split into Pi and I-Pi components is clean. The reliance on earlier published work by the same authors, for Schrodinger resolvents and completeness of eigenfunctions, is legitimate: those results have their own independent proofs, and I see no circularity.

Soft spots, in proportion. The main one is that several load-bearing lemmas have proofs that are skipped or described only as 'similar': Proposition 5.1 ends with 'the remaining details are skipped', Lemma 5.7 is skipped as similar to Lemma 5.6, and Lemma A.5, the asymptotic for the generalized Airy function, is dismissed as a standard steepest descent argument. For a paper whose entire claim is rigor, these are not cosmetic gaps: they sit inside the resolvent chain the main theorems depend on. They are probably fillable, but a referee should demand the details. Second, the title overpromises slightly. The U'' != 0 family generally requires a body force to be a stationary solution of Navier-Stokes, which the abstract does not say, and the stability claim is for monotone profiles only. The monotonicity is load-bearing, not a technicality: the Hardy inequalities, the turning-point estimates, and the Airy layers all use m > 0. The Poiseuille counterexample shows the restriction is natural rather than an oversight, and the paper says so clearly.

Who this is for: specialists in rigorous hydrodynamic stability, transition thresholds, and enhanced dissipation. It is not a paper to skim; it rewards a patient reader. It deserves a serious referee. My recommendation is conditional acceptance: the skipped proofs need to be completed or precisely cited, and the abstract should state the body-force caveat for non-quadratic profiles. If the gaps close, this is a cite-worthy result.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the linearized Navier–Stokes equations around a shear flow (U(x_2),0) in a two-dimensional periodic channel, under either no-slip or fixed-traction boundary conditions. Under the standing assumption that U' does not vanish (Assumption 2.14), the authors prove high-Reynolds-number linear stability for two classes: nearly Couette flows, where the second and third derivatives of U are small relative to |U'|, and flows with U'' of fixed sign. The main theorems (Theorems 2.15 and 2.16) give exponential semigroup decay bounds on (I - Pi)e^{-t T^#_P} with rates of order e^{-εΥ(Lε)^{-2/3}t} times explicit powers of L and ε, for both boundary conditions. The proof proceeds through a Hodge decomposition, reduction to the Orr–Sommerfeld operator, resolvent estimates for the inviscid Rayleigh operator, Schr"odinger resolvent estimates with Airy-function boundary layers, and a final semigroup argument.

Significance. If correct, the paper would be a substantial rigorous contribution to the linear stability theory of shear flows at high Reynolds number, going well beyond the explicitly solvable Couette case. Its strengths include the precise statement of parameter-uniform resolvent and semigroup estimates, the simultaneous treatment of no-slip and fixed-traction boundary conditions, and the careful reduction of the problem to a collection of one-dimensional spectral estimates. The decay rates are stated in terms of computable Airy spectral constants, and the comparison with the Couette results of [15] in Remark 2.17 is informative. I regard the central outline as sound. However, the scope is narrower than the title might suggest: the theorems cover only strictly monotone profiles U'≠0, which excludes the Poiseuille profile U=1-x^2, a case known to be linearly unstable for sufficiently large Reynolds number. Moreover, several load-bearing technical lemmas are stated without complete proofs, and these gaps need to be closed before the paper can be accepted.

major comments (4)

[Section 5.1, Proposition 5.1]
[Section 5.3, Lemma 5.7]
[Appendix A.2, Lemma A.5]
[Assumption 2.14 and Theorem 2.15/2.16]

minor comments (5)

[Abstract]
[Section 4.4, after Proposition 4.13]
[Section 2.4, proof of Proposition 2.13]
[Introduction, paragraph on [15]]
[Throughout]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the stability theorem is derived from independent resolvent estimates and standard Airy-function results; the monotonicity assumption is an explicit scope restriction, not a circular input.

full rationale

The paper's central claim (Theorems 2.15 and 2.16) is a semigroup decay bound for the linearized operator e^{-t T#_P(U,epsilon,L)}(I-Pi). The proof chain goes through resolvent estimates for the Orr-Sommerfeld operator (Propositions 7.1, 7.3, 8.3, 8.4, 8.7, 8.9) and for auxiliary Schroedinger/Airy operators, then converts resolvent bounds into semigroup bounds via an external Gearhart-Pruess-type result (Proposition 9.2, from Helffer-Sjostrand's published work [27]). The hypotheses of the resolvent estimates match the theorem assumptions, but the conclusions (uniform inverse norms) are independent nontrivial bounds, not restatements of the desired semigroup decay. The constants appearing in the decay rates, such as Re nu_1, theta_1^r, J_m, and hat mu_m, are spectral parameters of auxiliary Airy-type operators and are not fitted to the target quantity. Self-citations appear in the paper (e.g., Section 5 cites [29, 4] for Schroedinger resolvent estimates; Proposition 6.9 says 'We take a similar approach to the one in [5]'), but these are independent published results with their own proofs, and they are not used to assume the theorem being proved. The monotonicity condition m = inf |U'| > 0 in Assumption 2.14 is an explicit scope restriction: the introduction states that Poiseuille flow U = 1 - x^2 'falls outside the scope of this work.' Excluding non-monotone profiles narrows the claim but does not make it circular. No equation is defined in terms of the conclusion, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Therefore the derivation is self-contained modulo standard and external analytic facts, and no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters and no new physical entities. It relies on standard mathematical tools plus domain assumptions: C^4 monotone profiles, body-force-stationary flows for non-quadratic U, periodic length L << epsilon^{-1}, and the two boundary conditions. The constants ν1, mu_m, and theta1^r are derived from auxiliary one-dimensional operators, not fitted to data.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption U in C^4([-1,1]) and U' > 0 after WLOG transformation (Assumption 2.14).
The quantity m = inf |U'| > 0 is used in Hardy inequalities, turning point analysis, and Airy boundary layer constructions. Poiseuille flow, where U'(0)=0, is known unstable, so this assumption sets the scope of the theorem.
domain assumption For non-quadratic U, the base flow is a stationary solution of Navier-Stokes with an added body force b(x2) i2.
Unforced stationary shear flows require U'' to be constant. The paper explicitly extends to forced flows in Section 1, but the abstract does not mention this caveat.
domain assumption The flow is periodic in x1 with period L satisfying (L epsilon)^{-1} >= beta0/(2 pi), so L << epsilon^{-1}.
This ensures the lowest admissible Fourier frequency beta1 = 2 pi / (L epsilon) is large, which is the asymptotic regime in which the resolvent estimates are valid.
standard math Airy function asymptotics and positivity properties of the generalized Airy function A0, following Wasow 1953 and Appendix A.
Used to construct and normalize the boundary layer functions psi± and to prove that the spectral constant mu_m > 0, which controls the exponential decay rate.
standard math Fredholm theory, Hardy inequalities, semigroup theory, and resolvent estimates for Schrödinger operators from [29] and [4].
Background results invoked throughout Sections 4 to 9 for invertibility, a priori estimates, and semigroup bounds.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the stability of laminar flows between plates." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QAF23X2Y

@misc{pith2026190806328,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the stability of laminar flows between plates},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QAF23X2Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06328}
}

abstract

Consider a two-dimensional laminar flow between two plates, so that $(x_1,x_2)\in {\mathbb R} \times[-1,1]$, given by ${\mathbf v}(x_1,x_2)=(U(x_2),0)$, where $U\in C^4([-1,1])$ satisfies $U^\prime\neq0$ in $[-1,1]$. We prove that the flow is linearly stable in the large Reynolds number limit, in two different cases: $\bullet$ $\sup_{x\in[-1,1]} |U"(x)| + \sup_{x\in[-1,1]} |U"(x)| \ll \min_{x\in[-1,1]}|U^\prime(x)|$ (nearly Couette flows), $\bullet$ $U^{\prime\prime}\neq0$ in $[-1,1]$. We assume either no-slip or fixed traction force conditions on the plates, and an arbitrary large (but much smaller than the Reynolds number) period in the $x_1$ direction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

[15]

Q. Chen, T. Li, D. Wei, and Z. Zhang , Transition threshold for the 2-d Couette ﬂow in a ﬁnite channel . ArXiv:1808.08736, (2018)

arXiv 2018
[1]

Abramowitz and I

M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun , Handbook of Mathematical Functions . Dover, 1972

work page 1972
[2]

Agmon , Lectures on Elliptic Boundary Value Problems , prepared for publi- cation by B

S. Agmon , Lectures on Elliptic Boundary Value Problems , prepared for publi- cation by B. Frank Jones, Jr. with the assistance of George W. Bat ten, Jr. Van Nostrand Mathematical Studies, No. 2, D. Van Nostrand Co., Inc., Princeton, N.J.-Toronto-London, 1965

work page 1965
[3]

Almog , The Stability of the Normal State of Superconductors in the P res- ence of Electric Currents

Y. Almog , The Stability of the Normal State of Superconductors in the P res- ence of Electric Currents . SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 40 (2008), pp. 824–850. 116

work page 2008
[4]

Almog, D

Y. Almog, D. Grebenkov, and B. Helffer. On a Schr¨ odinger operator with a purely imaginary potential in the semiclassical limi t. Comm. Partial Dif- ferential Equations. Volume 44, 2019 - Issue 12

work page 2019
[5]

Almog and B

Y. Almog and B. Helffer , On the spectrum of non-selfadjoint Schr¨ odinger operators with compact resolvent . Comm. Partial Diﬀerential Equations, 40 (2015), pp. 1441–1466

work page 2015
[6]

Almog, B

Y. Almog, B. Helffer and X. B. Pan , Superconductivity near the normal state in a half-plane under the action of a perpendicular ele ctric current and an induced magnetic ﬁeld . Trans. AMS 365 (2013), 1183-1217

work page 2013
[7]

Bedrossian, P

J. Bedrossian, P. Germain, and N. Masmoudi, Stability of the Couette ﬂow at high Reynolds numbers in 2D and 3D. Bulletin of the American Mathe- matical Society 56 (2019), pp. 373-414

work page 2019

Show all 50 references

[8]

Bedrossian, P

J. Bedrossian, P. Germain, and N. Masmoudi, On the stability threshold for the 3D Couette ﬂow in Sobolev regularity. Annals of Mathematics 185 (2017) pp. 541-608

2017
[9]

Bedrossian, P

J. Bedrossian, P. Germain, and N. Masmoudi , Dynamics near the subcrit- ical transition of the 3d Couette ﬂow i: Below threshold case . ArXiv:1506.03720, (2015)

2015 arXiv
[10]

Bedrossian, N

J. Bedrossian, N. Masmoudi, and V. Vicol , Enhanced dissipation and inviscid damping in the inviscid limit of the Navier–Stokes equations near the two dimensional Couette ﬂow . Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 219 (2016), pp. 1087–1159

2016
[11]

Bedrossian and S

J. Bedrossian and S. He , Inviscid damping and enhanced dissipation of the boundary layer for 2d Navier-Stokes linearized around Coue tte ﬂow in a channel . ArXiv:1909.07230, (2019)

2019 arXiv
[12]

Bolley and J

P. Bolley and J. Camus, Quelques r´ esultats sur les espaces de Sobolev avec poids. Publication des s´ eminaires de math´ ematiques et informatique de Rennes, 1968-69, fascicule 1. <http://www.numdam.org/item?id=PSMIR 1968-1969 1 A1 0>

1968
[13]

Bolley and J

P. Bolley and J. Camus, Sur une classe d’op´ erateurs elliptiques et d´ eg´ en´ er´ es ` a une variable.Publication des s´ eminaires de math´ ematiques et in- formatique de Rennes, 1972, fascicule 1. < http://www.numdam.org/item?id=PSMIR 1972 1 A1 0>

1972
[14]

S. J. Chapman , Subcritical transition in channel ﬂows . Journal of Fluid Me- chanics, 451 (2002), pp. 35–97

2002
[16]

Q. Chen, D. Wei, and Z. Zhang , Linear stability of pipe Poiseuille ﬂow at high Reynolds number regime . ArXiv:1910.14245, (2019). 117

2019 arXiv
[17]

P. G. Drazin and W. H. Reid , Hydrodynamic stability. Cambridge Math- ematical Library, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, second ed., (2004). With a foreword by John Miles

2004
[18]

Dunford and J

N. Dunford and J. T. Schwartz , Linear operators. Part 2: Spectral theory. Self adjoint operators in Hilbert space . New York, (1963)

1963
[19]

G ´ erard-V aret, Ph´ enom` ene d’amortissement dans les ´ equations d’Euler (d’apr` es J

D. G ´ erard-V aret, Ph´ enom` ene d’amortissement dans les ´ equations d’Euler (d’apr` es J. Bedrossian et N. Masmoudi). S´ eminaire Bourbaki, 2014-2015, n0 1091

2014
[20]

Girault and P.-A

V. Girault and P.-A. Raviart, Finite element approximation of the Navier- Stokes equations . Vol. 749 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (1979)

1979
[21]

Gohberg, S

I. Gohberg, S. Goldberg, and M. A. Kaashoek , Classes of linear opera- tors. Vol. I , vol. 49 of Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, Birkh¨ au ser Verlag, Basel, (1990)

1990
[22]

Grenier, Y

E. Grenier, Y. Guo, and T. T. Nguyen , Spectral instability of general symmetric shear ﬂows in a two-dimensional channel . Advances in Mathematics, 292 (2016), pp. 52–110

2016
[23]

Grenier and T

E. Grenier and T. T. Nguyen , Green function for linearized Navier-Stokes around a boundary layer proﬁle: near critical layers . ArXiv:1705.05323, (2017). [24] , Green function of Orr–Sommerfeld equations away from criti cal layers . SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 51 (...

2017 arXiv
[25]

Helffer, On pseudo-spectral problems related to a time dependent mod el in superconductivity with electric current

B. Helffer, On pseudo-spectral problems related to a time dependent mod el in superconductivity with electric current. Conﬂuentes Math. 3 (2) (2011), pp. 237- 251

2011
[26]

Helffer, Spectral Theory and its Applications

B. Helffer, Spectral Theory and its Applications. Cambridge University Press (2013)

2013
[27]

Helffer and J

B. Helffer and J. Sj ¨ostrand, From resolvent bounds to semigroup bounds . ArXiv:1001.4171v1 (2010)

2010 arXiv
[28]

Henry, Spectral instability for even non-selfadjoint anharmonic oscillators

R. Henry, Spectral instability for even non-selfadjoint anharmonic oscillators. Journal of Spectral Theory, 4 (2014), pp. 349–364

2014
[29]

Henry, On the semi-classical analysis of Schr¨ odinger operators with purely imaginary electric potentials in a bounded domain

R. Henry, On the semi-classical analysis of Schr¨ odinger operators with purely imaginary electric potentials in a bounded domain. ArXiv:1405.6183 (2014)

2014 arXiv
[30]

Ibrahim, Y

S. Ibrahim, Y. Maekawa, and N. Masmoudi , On pseudospectral bound for non-selfadjoint operators and its application to stabi lity of Kolmogorov ﬂows . Annals of PDE, 5 (2019), p. 14

2019
[31]

Jia , Linear inviscid damping in Gevrey spaces

H. Jia , Linear inviscid damping in Gevrey spaces . ArXiv:1904.01188, (2019). 118

2019 arXiv
[32]

ArXiv:1902.06849, (2019)

, Linear inviscid damping near monotone shear ﬂows . ArXiv:1902.06849, (2019)

2019 arXiv
[33]

D. D. Joseph , Stability of ﬂuid motions I . Vol. 27, Springer Science & Business Media, (2013)

2013
[34]

Kufner and L.-E

A. Kufner and L.-E. Persson , Weighted inequalities of Hardy type . World Scientiﬁc Publishing Co., Inc., River Edge, NJ, (2003)

2003
[35]

Lang, Introduction to complex hyperbolic spaces

S. Lang, Introduction to complex hyperbolic spaces. Springer-Verlag, New York, (1987)

1987
[36]

T. Li, D. Wei, and Z. Zhang , Pseudospectral and spectral bounds for the oseen vortices operator . ArXiv:1701.06269, (2017)

2017 arXiv
[37]

Lin , Some recent results on instability of ideal plane ﬂows

Z. Lin , Some recent results on instability of ideal plane ﬂows . in Nonlinear partial diﬀerential equations and related analysis, vol. 371 of Cont emp. Math., Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, (2005), pp. 217–229

2005
[38]

P. D. Miller , Applied asymptotic analysis . Vol. 75 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, (2 006)
[39]

Orr , The stability or instability of the steady motions of a liqui d

W. Orr , The stability or instability of the steady motions of a liqui d. Part II, Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, A. 27: 69–138 (1907)

1907
[40]

S. A. Orszag , Accurate solution of the Orr–Sommerfeld stability equatio n. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 50 (1971), pp. 689–703

1971
[41]

Reed and B

M. Reed and B. Simon , Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, Vol. II: Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness. Academic Press (1975)

1975
[42]

V. A. Romanov , Stability of plane-parallel Couette ﬂow . Funkcional. Anal. i Priloˇ zen., 7 (1973), pp. 62–73

1973
[43]

Schmid and D

P. Schmid and D. Henningson , Stability and transition in shear ﬂows . Volume 142, Springer, (2001)

2001
[44]

A. A. Shkalikov , Spectral portraits of the Orr-Sommerfeld operator at large Reynolds numbers . Sovrem. Mat. Fundam. Napravl., 3 (2003), pp. 89–112

2003
[45]

Sj ¨ostrand, Non-Self-Adjoint Diﬀerential Operators, Spectral Asympt otics and Random Perturbations

J. Sj ¨ostrand, Non-Self-Adjoint Diﬀerential Operators, Spectral Asympt otics and Random Perturbations. Pseudo-Diﬀerential Operators, Theory and Appli- cations 14, Birkh¨ auser (2019)

2019
[46]

Sommerfeld , Ein Beitrag zur hydrodynamische Erkl¨ arung der turbulen- ten Fl¨ ussigkeitsbewegungen

A. Sommerfeld , Ein Beitrag zur hydrodynamische Erkl¨ arung der turbulen- ten Fl¨ ussigkeitsbewegungen. Proceedings of the 4th International Congress of Mathematicians. III. Rome. pp. 116–124 (1908)

1908
[47]

W asow, On small disturbances of plane Couette ﬂow

W. W asow, On small disturbances of plane Couette ﬂow . J. Research Nat. Bur. Standards, 51 (1953), pp. 195–202. 119

1953
[48]

Wei and Z

D. Wei and Z. Zhang , Enhanced dissipation for the Kolmogorov ﬂow via the hypocoercivity method. Science China Mathematics, 62 (2019), pp. 1219–1232

2019
[49]

D. Wei, Z. Zhang, and W. Zhao , Linear inviscid damping for a class of monotone shear ﬂow in Sobolev spaces . Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 71 (2018), pp. 617–687

2018
[50]

Yaglom, Hydrodynamic Instability and Transition to Turbulence

A. Yaglom, Hydrodynamic Instability and Transition to Turbulence . Volume
[100]

Springer, (2012). 120

2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [15]

Q. Chen, T. Li, D. Wei, and Z. Zhang , Transition threshold for the 2-d Couette ﬂow in a ﬁnite channel . ArXiv:1808.08736, (2018)

arXiv 2018

[2] [1]

Abramowitz and I

M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun , Handbook of Mathematical Functions . Dover, 1972

work page 1972

[3] [2]

Agmon , Lectures on Elliptic Boundary Value Problems , prepared for publi- cation by B

S. Agmon , Lectures on Elliptic Boundary Value Problems , prepared for publi- cation by B. Frank Jones, Jr. with the assistance of George W. Bat ten, Jr. Van Nostrand Mathematical Studies, No. 2, D. Van Nostrand Co., Inc., Princeton, N.J.-Toronto-London, 1965

work page 1965

[4] [3]

Almog , The Stability of the Normal State of Superconductors in the P res- ence of Electric Currents

Y. Almog , The Stability of the Normal State of Superconductors in the P res- ence of Electric Currents . SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 40 (2008), pp. 824–850. 116

work page 2008

[5] [4]

Almog, D

Y. Almog, D. Grebenkov, and B. Helffer. On a Schr¨ odinger operator with a purely imaginary potential in the semiclassical limi t. Comm. Partial Dif- ferential Equations. Volume 44, 2019 - Issue 12

work page 2019

[6] [5]

Almog and B

Y. Almog and B. Helffer , On the spectrum of non-selfadjoint Schr¨ odinger operators with compact resolvent . Comm. Partial Diﬀerential Equations, 40 (2015), pp. 1441–1466

work page 2015

[7] [6]

Almog, B

Y. Almog, B. Helffer and X. B. Pan , Superconductivity near the normal state in a half-plane under the action of a perpendicular ele ctric current and an induced magnetic ﬁeld . Trans. AMS 365 (2013), 1183-1217

work page 2013

[8] [7]

Bedrossian, P

J. Bedrossian, P. Germain, and N. Masmoudi, Stability of the Couette ﬂow at high Reynolds numbers in 2D and 3D. Bulletin of the American Mathe- matical Society 56 (2019), pp. 373-414

work page 2019