Towards low-temperature peculiarities of thermodynamic quantities for decorated spin chains

Oleg Derzhko; Onofre Rojas; Sergio Martins de Souza; Taras Hutak; Taras Krokhmalskii

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Towards low-temperature peculiarities of thermodynamic quantities for decorated spin chains

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The sharp low-temperature peaks in decorated spin chains—the pseudo-transition—are finite-temperature remnants of the standard Ising chain's critical point at $H=0$, $T=0$, reached because the effective parameters of the chain are…

desk verdict A clean derivation of pseudo-critical exponents from the Ising-chain critical point, with the caveat that the 'universal' exponents assume a linear zero of the effective field. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06419 v1 pith:J7Q45M2N submitted 2019-08-18 cond-mat.stat-mech

Taras Krokhmalskii , Taras Hutak , Onofre Rojas , Sergio Martins de Souza , Oleg Derzhko This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.stat-mech MSC 82B2082B2382B2682B27 PACS 05.70.Fh75.10.-b75.10.Jm75.10.Pq

keywords pseudo-transitiondecoratedspinchainsIsingchaintemperature-dependenteffectiveparameterscriticalpointspecificheatsusceptibilitycorrelationlength

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper explains why certain decorated one-dimensional spin chains show sharp low-temperature peaks in specific heat, susceptibility, and correlation length—the "pseudo-transition"—without undergoing a true phase transition. The authors show that after integrating out the decorated units, each model becomes a standard Ising chain whose exchange and field are temperature-dependent. As temperature rises, the effective field crosses zero at $T_p$, and if this crossing happens at low enough temperature, the system passes close to the $H=0$, $T=0$ critical point of the plain Ising chain, producing large but finite peaks. They derive the universal exponents $\alpha=\gamma=3$, $\nu=1$ from the linear vanishing of the effective field. This gives a criterion for finding new decorated models with the same behavior and clarifies when the specific-heat peak can be suppressed.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the mapping of a decorated spin chain to the effective Ising Hamiltonian (2.1), $H_{\rm eff}=C(T)-J_{\rm eff}(T)\sum_n\sigma_n\sigma_{n+1}-H_{\rm eff}(T)\sum_n\sigma_n$, with $J_{\rm eff}>0$ and $H_{\rm eff}$ changing sign at $T_p$. The transfer-matrix eigenvalues of this temperature-dependent Ising chain (2.5) yield all thermodynamic quantities; the decisive feature is the trajectory in the $H/J$–$T/J$ plane, which crosses $H=0$ at low temperature. Near $T_p$, the correlation length and susceptibility scale as $\xi\propto |H_{\rm eff}|^{-1}$ and $\chi\propto |H_{\rm eff}|^{-3}$, and the specific heat inherits the susceptibility peak through $c^{(8)}=T\chi(H'_{\rm eff})^2$. The linear form $H_{\rm eff}\approx A(T-T_p)$, Eq. (4.1), is what turns those power laws into the universal exponents.

What would settle it

For any candidate decorated chain, compute $J_{\rm eff}(T)$ and $H_{\rm eff}(T)$ from the exact decimation and test whether $H_{\rm eff}(T_p)=0$ with $2J_{\rm eff}(T_p)/T_p\gg1$; if a sharp peak in $\chi(T)$ or $c(T)$ still appears when the crossing occurs at high temperature or with $2J_{\rm eff}(T_p)/T_p$ of order one, the claimed sufficient condition is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the pseudo-transition—the sharp low-temperature peaks in thermodynamic quantities of certain decorated spin chains—is a finite-temperature echo of the critical point of the standard ferromagnetic Ising chain at $H=0$, $T=0$. After the decorated degrees of freedom are traced out, each model reduces exactly to an Ising chain with temperature-dependent parameters (2.1); the pseudo-critical temperature $T_p$ is where the effective field vanishes, $H_{\rm eff}(T_p)=0$. When $2J_{\rm eff}(T_p)/T_p\gg1$, the system's trajectory in the $H/J$–$T/J$ plane passes close to that critical point, producing a large correlation length, a near-saturated magnetization jump, and peaks in susceptibility and specific heat. Because $H_{\rm eff}(T)\approx A(T-T_p)$ near $T_p$, the peak widths are controlled by a single slope $A$, and the universal pseudo-critical exponents $\alpha=\gamma=3$, $\nu=1$ follow directly. The same mechanism explains why the specific-heat peak can be quenched when the slope $A$ is tiny.

Load-bearing premise

The sharp pseudo-transition peaks require that the effective exchange $J_{\rm eff}(T)$ stay ferromagnetic and slowly varying while the effective field $H_{\rm eff}(T)$ crosses zero at a low temperature with a finite nonzero slope; if the crossing temperature is not low or the slope is extremely small, the peaks broaden or are quenched.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The universal exponents $\alpha=\gamma=3$, $\nu=1$ are a direct consequence of the linear vanishing of $H_{\rm eff}$ at $T_p$, so they should appear in every decorated chain whose effective parameters obey (2.2) and (3.10).
The specific-heat peak can disappear even when the susceptibility peak remains large, controlled by the factor $T_p A^2$; thermodynamic measurements that see only $c(T)$ may miss the pseudo-transition.
The magnetization jump at $T_p$ forces jumps in internal energy and entropy through the temperature derivatives of the effective parameters, linking magnetic and thermal anomalies.
The mapping gives a search criterion: new decorated spin chains with pseudo-transitions can be found by looking for effective Ising parameters whose zero-field crossing lies at low temperature.
The same logic suggests extensions to higher-spin effective Ising chains and to two-dimensional decorated lattices whose trajectories pass near the square-lattice Ising critical point.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the mechanism is generic, then measuring $\chi(T)$ and $c(T)$ simultaneously in a candidate material provides a direct estimate of the slope $A=dH_{\rm eff}/dT|_{T_p}$, which is not otherwise experimentally accessible.
The explanation implies that pseudo-transitions are smoother in systems where the effective-field crossing temperature cannot be made small; for instance, the higher of the two zero-crossings in the coupled spin-electron double-tetrahedral chain should show no sharp anomalies, which could be checked numerically.
The same trajectory picture might be applied to quasi-one-dimensional compounds with slow parameter variation, where the sharp peaks would appear as finite-size or impurity-broadened remnants rather than true transitions.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here is my take. The paper does something real: it gives a mechanism for pseudo-transitions in decorated spin chains, reducing them to the standard Ising chain with temperature-dependent parameters. The key new step is the explicit derivation of the pseudo-critical exponents α=α′=γ=γ′=3, ν=ν′=1 from the Ising chain's field dependence plus a linear zero of Heff. That derivation is exact and parameter-free for the three models considered, and the chain-rule formulas for e, s, c are correct. The paper also states a sufficient condition (3.10) for a sharp pseudo-transition and, commendably, shows in Fig 10 that the specific-heat peak can be quenched when the slope A is tiny.

The stress-test note raises a fair point: the universal exponents are not inherited from the Ising critical point alone; they require Heff to cross zero linearly with a nonzero, not-too-small slope. The paper recognizes this in Section IV and in the discussion of Fig 10, but it doesn't fold it into the headline condition. Equation (3.10) plus (2.2) do not guarantee a specific-heat pseudo-peak; they guarantee a large correlation length and susceptibility. So the abstract's "can be tracked down to the critical point" is the right mechanism, but the specific-heat universality is conditional. The paper would be tighter if it stated a combined condition involving TpA^2, or at least separated the conditions for ξ, χ, and c.

The soft spots are modest. The correlation-length part leans partly on Ref [10]'s numerics, but the scaling argument stands. The assumption that Jeff stays ferromagnetic and slowly varying is checked for chosen parameters, not proven generally, which is fine for an explanatory paper. The authors are honest about the finite peak at Tp and about the thermodynamic sum rule.

I would send this to a serious referee. It is a clean, honest explanation that belongs in the literature, and the exact calculations back the central claim. The main revision I would ask for is to make the slope condition explicit in the sufficient condition and to soften "universal" so it does not suggest the exponents follow from the Ising critical point alone.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an explanation for the low-temperature pseudo-transitions observed in one-dimensional decorated spin chains. It shows that after exactly tracing out the decorated degrees of freedom, the models reduce to a standard ferromagnetic Ising chain with temperature-dependent effective exchange Jeff(T) and effective field Heff(T). The pseudo-critical temperature Tp is defined by Heff(Tp)=0, and the authors argue that when Tp is low enough that 2Jeff(Tp)/Tp is large, the decorrelated chain inherits remnants of the Ising critical point at H=0, T=0. They derive explicit formulas for internal energy, entropy, and specific heat that include derivatives of the effective parameters, and they identify the term c(8)=Tχ(H'_eff)^2 as the dominant contribution to the specific-heat peak. Under the assumption Heff(T)≈A(T−Tp), they recover the pseudo-critical exponents α=γ=3ν=3 reported earlier. The argument is illustrated for the spin-1/2 Ising-XYZ diamond chain, the coupled spin-electron double-tetrahedral chain, and the spin-1/2 Ising-Heisenberg double-tetrahedral chain. The paper also documents a case in which a small slope A suppresses the specific-heat peak even though the susceptibility still peaks.

Significance. If the claims are accepted, the paper provides a useful conceptual unification: the mysterious pseudo-transitions of several decorated spin chains are attributed to trajectories in the H/J−T/J plane passing near the critical point of the standard Ising chain. The reduction for each of the three examples is exact and parameter-free, and the resulting expressions for e, s, and c in terms of Jeff and Heff are internally consistent and clearly stated. The paper also gives a falsifiable criterion—Eq. (3.10) plus the slope condition—for identifying decorated models that should display sharp low-temperature features, and it explicitly connects the earlier numerical exponents of Ref. [10] to a simple analytic mechanism. The main weakness is that the stated sufficient condition for a pseudo-transition is too strong when applied to the specific heat, and the claimed universality of exponents is conditional on a linear zero of Heff. These issues are significant but can be addressed by clarifying the conditions and the scope of the universality statement.

major comments (2)

[Section V and Eq. (3.10)] The paper calls Eq. (3.10), together with Eq. (2.2), a sufficient condition for occurrence of the pseudo-transition. However, the example in Fig. 10 (γ=0.82, h=7.916228) satisfies Heff(Tp)=0 and has Tp/J_eff≈0.0999, so 2Jeff(Tp)/Tp≈20, yet the specific heat shows no peak because TpA^2 is about 10^-15. Thus Eq. (2.2) plus Eq. (3.10) is not sufficient for the specific-heat signature. The authors themselves note this in the text around Fig. 10, but the conclusion in Section V still states the two conditions as sufficient without qualification. Please either define the pseudo-transition by the correlation-length, susceptibility, and magnetization signatures—for which Eq. (3.10) is indeed controlling—and state separately that a specific-heat peak additionally requires TpA^2 not to be too small, or include the slope condition explicitly in the sufficiency statement.
[Section IV, Eq. (4.1)] The derivation of the universal exponents α=γ=3ν=3 uses the assumption Heff(T)≈A(T−Tp) with finite nonzero A. This is an additional property of the decorated model and is not a consequence of the Ising critical point alone. If Heff has a quadratic zero, Heff≈B(T−Tp)^2, then Eqs. (3.14) and (3.16) give ν=2 and γ=6, and the c(8) term behaves as |T−Tp|^{-4} (or is modified by the Jacobian). The paper does acknowledge the role of A in suppressing the specific-heat peak, but Section IV would be clearer if it stated explicitly that the universal exponent set applies only to linear crossings and, ideally, if it verified the linear-crossing condition for the three models under discussion.

minor comments (5)

[Eqs. (3.14) and (3.16)] The notation "T≈Tp, (3.12)" used in Eqs. (3.14) and (3.16) is confusing, because the asymptotic formulas diverge at Tp while the exact expressions at Tp are finite. Please rephrase to say that these hold in the range where inequality (3.12) is satisfied but not exactly at Tp.
[Fig. 10] The red dashed curves with up-triangles and down-triangles are hard to distinguish in grayscale print; please use more clearly distinct line styles or colors and ensure the caption identifies which curve is (H'_eff)^2 and which is Tχ.
[Abstract] The abstract contains a spurious space in "q uantities"; similar typographical artifacts appear elsewhere and should be cleaned up.
[Introduction, Ref. [13]] The parenthetical footnote [13] lists several unrelated examples of extra low-temperature peaks in other spin systems; the connection to the pseudo-transition discussed here is not developed and the list may be trimmed or made more specific.
[Section III, discussion after Eq. (3.11)] The statement that ξ(Tp) tends to infinity only for 2Jeff(Tp)/Tp→∞ is correct, but the subsequent phrase "under this assumption Eq. (3.9) gives the estimate" could be clarified: Eq. (3.11) is an asymptotic estimate valid for large 2Jeff(Tp)/Tp, not an exact identity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the pseudo-critical exponents are derived from the exact effective-Ising mapping and the textbook Ising transfer matrix, not fitted or self-cited into existence.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. The reduction of each decorated model to the effective Ising chain (2.1) is carried out explicitly in Appendices A-C, yielding closed forms for C(T), J_eff(T), and H_eff(T). The subsequent analysis uses the standard Ising-chain transfer-matrix solution (Baxter, an external textbook result) and differentiates the resulting free energy with respect to T, with Eqs. (3.5)-(3.7) following from the chain rule, not from any fitted target quantity. The pseudo-critical temperature is defined, not fitted, by H_eff(T_p)=0 in Eq. (2.2), and the correlation-length, susceptibility, and specific-heat peaks are obtained from the exact eigenvalues under the stated asymptotic condition (3.12). The universal exponents alpha=gamma=3, nu=1 follow from H_eff(T) approximately A(T-T_p), Eq. (4.1), which is exhibited for the specific models rather than imposed as the desired result. Self-citations to Refs. [5,8,9,10] occur for model definitions and for previously observed numerical exponents, but those citations are not load-bearing: the explanation in Sections III-IV is analytic and would stand even without them. The Fig. 10 caveat, where a very small slope A quenches the specific-heat peak despite Eqs. (2.2) and (3.10), is an acknowledged limitation of the sufficient condition and concerns the scope of the claim, not a circular reduction of the derivation to its inputs. There is therefore no step in which a prediction reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, a self-citation chain, or a definitional equivalence.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters or entities. Its contribution rests on the standard Ising solution plus three model-specific exact mappings; the only non-derived inputs are the analytic linear-crossing behavior of Heff(T), which is the main condition for the sharp peaks, and the transfer of the correlation-length statement to the original decorated spins.

assumptions (4)

standard math Transfer-matrix solution of the one-dimensional Ising chain, including eigenvalues (2.5) and the H=0, T=0 critical point structure.
Invoked throughout Section II and used for all thermodynamic quantities.
domain assumption The reduction of the three decorated models to the effective Ising model (2.1) with C(T), Jeff(T), Heff(T) is exact.
Presented in Appendices A-C using Boltzmann weights taken from Refs [1], [8], [9]; the paper does not re-derive these weights from the microscopic Hamiltonians, it uses established exact results.
domain assumption Heff(T) is analytic at Tp and crosses zero with finite nonzero slope A, so Heff(T) approximately equals A(T-Tp).
Used in Section IV (Eq 4.1) to get the exponents; verified on selected parameter sets in Figs 1-3 but not proven in general.
domain assumption Long-distance correlation decay of the original decorated spins is governed by the same ratio lambda-/lambda+ as the effective Ising spins.
The abstract claims correlations of decorated chains; Section III derives only the effective correlation length (Eq 3.2), and the decorated-spin correlators are cited to Ref [8].

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Towards low-temperature peculiarities of thermodynamic quantities for decorated spin chains." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J7Q45M2N

@misc{pith2026190806419,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Towards low-temperature peculiarities of thermodynamic quantities for decorated spin chains},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J7Q45M2N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06419}
}

abstract

We discuss the origin of an enigmatic low-temperature behavior of one-dimensional decorated spin systems which was coined the pseudo-transition. Tracing out the decorated parts results in the standard Ising-chain model with temperature-dependent parameters and the unexpected low-temperature behavior of thermodynamic quantities and correlations of the decorated spin chains can be tracked down to the critical point of the standard Ising-chain model at ${\sf H}=0$ and ${\sf T}=0$. We illustrate this perspective using as examples the spin-1/2 Ising-XYZ diamond chain, the coupled spin-electron double-tetrahedral chain, and the spin-1/2 Ising-Heisenberg double-tetrahedral chain.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.06419 by the authors.

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3: The spin-1/2 Ising-Heisenberg double-tetrahedral [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2: The double-tetrahedral chain of localized Ising spi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (13 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: Correlation length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: Magnetization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7: Internal energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8: Entropy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10: Specific heat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9: Specific heat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: FIG. 11: Phase diagram [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_11.png]

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: FIG. 12: Spin-1/2 Ising-XYZ diamond chain lattice; [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_12.png]

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: FIG. 13: Ground-state phase diagram for the spin-1/2 Ising [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_13.png]

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: FIG. 14: A part of the spin-electron system on a double [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_14.png]

**Figure 15.** Figure 15: FIG. 15: The ground-state phase diagram in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_15.png]

**Figure 16.** Figure 16: FIG. 16: Schematic representation of the Ising-Heisenberg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_16.png]

**Figure 17.** Figure 17: FIG. 17: Zero-temperature phase diagram in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_17.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Peculiarities in pseudo-transitions of a mixed spin-$(1/2,1)$ Ising-Heisenberg double-tetrahedral chain in an external magnetic field
cond-mat.stat-mech 2019-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

An exactly solved 1D mixed-spin chain shows finite-temperature pseudo-transitions near five ground-state phase boundaries, including an interface between two non-degenerate ferrimagnetic phases.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[10]

I. M. Carvalho, J. Torrico, S. M. de Souza, O. Rojas, and O. Derzhko, Annals of Physics 402, 45 (2019)

work page 2019
[1]

Gálisová and J

L. Gálisová and J. Strečka, Phys. Rev. E 91, 022134 (2015)

work page 2015
[2]

As a candidate for such a decorated two-dimensional spin model we may suggest a diamond-like-decorated square lattice [16]

in the H/ J − T/ J plane should also exhibit interesting behav- ior conditioned by that critical point. As a candidate for such a decorated two-dimensional spin model we may suggest a diamond-like-decorated square lattice [16]. Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge helpful discussions with Yu. Holovatch, A. Honecker, J. Richter, A. Shvaika, I...

work page 2017
[3]

5892 and γ ≈ 0. 8314. For further details see Ref. [8]. Appendix A: Spin-1/2 Ising-XYZ diamond chain We consider the spin-1/2 Ising-XYZ diamond chain with the Hamiltonian (we use notations of Ref. [8]): H = N∑ i=1 Hi, Hi = −J(1+ γ)Sx a,i Sx b,i − J(1−γ)Sy a,i Sy b,i − JzSz a,i Sz b,i −J0(Sz a,i + Sz b,i )(σi + σi+1) −hz(Sz a,i + Sz b,i ) − h 2 (σi + σi+1)...

work page
[4]

Torrico, M

J. Torrico, M. Rojas, S. M. de Souza, and O. Rojas, Phys. Lett. A 380, 3655 (2016)

work page 2016
[5]

Rojas, J

O. Rojas, J. Strečka, and S. M. de Souza, Solid State Communications 246, 68 (2016)

work page 2016
[6]

Strečka, R

J. Strečka, R. C. Alécio, M. L. Lyra, and O. Rojas, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 409, 124 (2016)

work page 2016
[7]

S. M. de Souza and O. Rojas, Solid State Communica- tions 269, 131 (2018)

work page 2018

Show all 24 references

[8]

See also P. N. Timonin, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 113, 251 (2011); X. Ma, S. Cambré, W. Wenseleers, S. K. Doorn, and H. Htoon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 027402 (2017); R. A. Stancioli and L. A. S. Mól, Phys. Rev. B 100, 024432 (2019)

2011
[9]

I. M. Carvalho, J. Torrico, S. M. de Souza, M. Rojas, and O. Rojas, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 465, 323 (2018)

2018
[11]

Rojas, arXiv:1810.07817

O. Rojas, arXiv:1810.07817

arXiv
[12]

Rojas, J

O. Rojas, J. Strečka, M. L. Lyra, and S. M. de Souza, Phys. Rev. E 99, 042117 (2019)

2019
[13]

Strečka, arXiv:1904.10704

J. Strečka, arXiv:1904.10704

1904 arXiv
[14]

Rojas, J

O. Rojas, J. Strečka, O. Derzhko, and S. M. de Souza, Peculiarities in pseudo-transitions of a mixed spin-(1/2,
[15]

Ising-Heisenberg double-tetrahedral chain in an exter- nal magnetic ﬁeld , to be submitted (2019)

2019
[16]

Misguich and B

Interestingly, an extra low-temperature peak is obser ved in a number of spin systems and its study is a hot topic nowadays, see, for instance, G. Misguich and B. Bernu, Phys. Rev. B 71, 014417 (2005); J. Schnack, J. Schulenburg, and J. Richter, Phys. Rev. B 98, 094423 (2018);...

2005 arXiv
[17]

Van den Heuvel and L

W. Van den Heuvel and L. F. Chibotaru, Phys. Rev. B 82, 174436 (2010)

2010
[18]

R. J. Baxter, Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Me- chanics (Academic Press, 1982)

1982
[19]

Hirose, A

Y. Hirose, A. Oguchi, and Y. Fukumoto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 86, 014002 (2017)

2017
[20]

Mambrini, J

M. Mambrini, J. Trébosc, and F. Mila, Phys. Rev. B 59, 13806 (1999)

1999
[21]

Rojas and F

O. Rojas and F. C. Alcaraz, Phys. Rev. B 67, 174401 (2003)

2003
[22]

Maksymenko, O

M. Maksymenko, O. Derzhko, and J. Richter, Acta Physica Polonica A 119, 860 (2011); M. Maksymenko, O. Derzhko, and J. Richter, Eur. Phys. J. B 84, 397 (2011)

2011
[23]

Ohanyan, Condensed Matter Physics 12, 343 (2009)

V. Ohanyan, Condensed Matter Physics 12, 343 (2009)

2009
[24]

Antonosyan, S

D. Antonosyan, S. Bellucci, and V. Ohanyan, Phys. Rev. B 79, 014432 (2009)

2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [10]

I. M. Carvalho, J. Torrico, S. M. de Souza, O. Rojas, and O. Derzhko, Annals of Physics 402, 45 (2019)

work page 2019

[2] [1]

Gálisová and J

L. Gálisová and J. Strečka, Phys. Rev. E 91, 022134 (2015)

work page 2015

[3] [2]

As a candidate for such a decorated two-dimensional spin model we may suggest a diamond-like-decorated square lattice [16]

in the H/ J − T/ J plane should also exhibit interesting behav- ior conditioned by that critical point. As a candidate for such a decorated two-dimensional spin model we may suggest a diamond-like-decorated square lattice [16]. Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge helpful discussions with Yu. Holovatch, A. Honecker, J. Richter, A. Shvaika, I...

work page 2017

[4] [3]

5892 and γ ≈ 0. 8314. For further details see Ref. [8]. Appendix A: Spin-1/2 Ising-XYZ diamond chain We consider the spin-1/2 Ising-XYZ diamond chain with the Hamiltonian (we use notations of Ref. [8]): H = N∑ i=1 Hi, Hi = −J(1+ γ)Sx a,i Sx b,i − J(1−γ)Sy a,i Sy b,i − JzSz a,i Sz b,i −J0(Sz a,i + Sz b,i )(σi + σi+1) −hz(Sz a,i + Sz b,i ) − h 2 (σi + σi+1)...

work page

[5] [4]

Torrico, M

J. Torrico, M. Rojas, S. M. de Souza, and O. Rojas, Phys. Lett. A 380, 3655 (2016)

work page 2016

[6] [5]

Rojas, J

O. Rojas, J. Strečka, and S. M. de Souza, Solid State Communications 246, 68 (2016)

work page 2016

[7] [6]

Strečka, R

J. Strečka, R. C. Alécio, M. L. Lyra, and O. Rojas, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 409, 124 (2016)

work page 2016

[8] [7]

S. M. de Souza and O. Rojas, Solid State Communica- tions 269, 131 (2018)

work page 2018